A blueprint for Tyranny – Report from Iron Mountain

© see below (fair use)

Report report_from_iron_mountain.pdf

Report from Iron Mountain; Using fear to make people subservient to government.


© 2002 by G. Edward Griffin

Freedom Force International

This is taken from Chapter 24 of The Creature from Jekyll Island

(When added to The Freedom Manifesto, this material should be expanded to include the concept of deliberate waste. With that included, it will make an excellent chapter.)

The substance of these stratagems [for the weakening of the United States so it can be more easily merged into a global government based on the model of collectivism] can be traced to a think-tank study released in 1966 called the Report from Iron Mountain. Although the origin of the report is highly debated, the document itself hints that it was commissioned by the Department of Defense under Defense Secretary, Robert McNamara and was produced by the Hudson Institute located at the base of Iron Mountain in Croton-on-Hudson, New York. The Hudson Institute was founded and directed by Herman Kahn, formerly of the Rand Corporation. Both McNamara and Kahn were members of the CFR.

The self-proclaimed purpose of the study was to explore various ways to “stabilize society.” Praiseworthy as that may sound, a reading of the Report soon reveals that the word society is used synonymously with the word government. Furthermore, the word stabilize is used as meaning to preserve and to perpetuate. It is clear from the start that the nature of the study was to analyze the different ways a government can perpetuate itself in power, ways to control its citizens and prevent them from rebelling. It was stated at the beginning of the Report that morality was not an issue. The study did not address questions of right or wrong; nor did it deal with such concepts as freedom or human rights. Ideology was not an issue, nor patriotism, nor religious precepts. Its sole concern was how to perpetuate the existing government. The Report said: 

Previous studies have taken the desirability of peace, the importance of human life, the superiority of democratic institutions, the greatest “good” for the greatest number, the “dignity” of the individual, the desirability of maximum health and longevity, and other such wishful premises as axiomatic values necessary for the justification of a study of peace issues. We have not found them so. We have attempted to apply the standards of physical science to our thinking, the principal characteristic of which is not quantification, as is popularly believed, but that, in Whitehead’s words, “…it ignores all judgments of value; for instance, all esthetic and moral judgments.” (1)

The major conclusion of the report was that, in the past, war has been the only reliable means to achieve that goal. It contends that only during times of war or the threat of war are the masses compliant enough to carry the yoke of government without complaint. Fear of conquest and pillage by an enemy can make almost any burden seem acceptable by comparison. War can be used to arouse human passion and patriotic feelings of loyalty to the nation’s leaders. No amount of sacrifice in the name of victory will be rejected. Resistance is viewed as treason. But, in times of peace, people become resentful of high taxes, shortages, and bureaucratic intervention. When they become disrespectful of their leaders, they become dangerous. No government has long survived without enemies and armed conflict. War, therefore, has been an indispensable condition for “stabilizing society.” These are the report’s exact words:

The war system not only has been essential to the existence of nations as independent political entities, but has been equally indispensable to their stable political structure. Without it, no government has ever been able to obtain acquiescence in its “legitimacy,” or right to rule its society. The possibility of war provides the sense of external necessity without which no government can long remain in power. The historical record reveals one instance after another where the failure of a regime to maintain the credibility of a war threat led to its dissolution, by the forces of private interest, of reactions to social injustice, or of other disintegrative elements. The organization of society for the possibility of war is its principal political stabilizer…. It has enabled societies to maintain necessary class distinctions, and it has insured the subordination of the citizens to the state by virtue of the residual war powers inherent in the concept of nationhood. (2)


The report then explains that we are approaching a point in history where the old formulas may no longer work. Why? Because it may now be possible to create a world government in which all nations will be disarmed and disciplined by a world army, a condition which will be called peace. The report says: “The word peace, as we have used it in the following pages, … implies total and general disarmament.” (3)

Under that scenario, independent nations will no longer exist and governments will not have the capability to wage war. There could be military action by the world army against renegade political subdivisions, but these would be called peace-keeping operations, and soldiers would be called peace keepers. No matter how much property is destroyed or how much blood is spilled, the bullets will be “peaceful” bullets and the bombs – even atomic bombs, if necessary – will be “peaceful” bombs.

The report then raises the question of whether there can ever be a suitable substitute for war. What else could the regional governments use – and what could the world government itself use – to legitimize and perpetuate itself? To provide an answer to that question was the stated purpose of the study.

The Report from Iron Mountain concludes that there can be no substitute for war unless it possesses three properties. It must (1) be economically wasteful, (2) represent a credible threat of great magnitude, and (3) provide a logical excuse for compulsory service to the government.


On the subject of compulsory service, the Report explains that one of the advantages of standing armies is that they provide a place for the government to put antisocial and dissident elements of society. In the absence of war, these forced-labor battalions would be told they are fighting poverty or cleaning up the planet or bolstering the economy or serving the common good in some other fashion. Every teenager would be required to serve – especially during those years in which young people are most rebellious against authority. Older people, too, would be drafted as a means of working off tax payments and fines. Dissidents would face heavy fines for “hate crimes” and politically incorrect attitudes so, eventually, they would all be in the forced-labor battalions. The Report says:

We will examine … the time-honored use of military institutions to provide anti-social elements with an acceptable role in the social structure. … The current euphemistic clichés – “juvenile delinquency” and “alienation” – have had their counterparts in every age. In earlier days these conditions were dealt with directly by the military without the complications of due process, usually through press gangs or outright enslavement. …

Most proposals that address themselves, explicitly or otherwise, to the postwar problem of controlling the socially alienated turn to some variant of the Peace Corps or the so-called Job Corps for a solution. The socially disaffected, the economically unprepared, the psychologically uncomfortable, the hard-core “delinquents,” the incorrigible “subversives,” and the rest of the unemployable are seen as somehow transformed by the disciplines of a service modeled on military precedent into more or less dedicated social service workers. …

Another possible surrogate for the control of potential enemies of society is the reintroduction, in some form consistent with modern technology and political processes, of slavery. … It is entirely possible that the development of a sophisticated form of slavery may be an absolute prerequisite for socialcontrol in a world at peace. As a practical matter, conversion of the code of military discipline to a euphemized form of enslavement would entail surprisingly little revision; the logical first step would be the adoption of some form of “universal” military service. (4)


The Report considered ways in which the public could be preoccupied with non-important activities so that it would not have time to participate in political debate or resistance. Recreation, trivial game shows, pornography, and situation comedies could play an important role, but blood games were considered to be the most promising of all the options. Blood games are competitive events between individuals or teams that are sufficiently violent in nature to enable the spectators to vicariously work off their frustrations. As a minimum, these events must evoke a passionate team loyalty on the part of the fans and must include the expectation of pain and injury on the part of the players. Even better for their purpose is the spilling of blood and the possibility of death. The common man has a morbid fascination for violence and blood. Crowds gather to chant “Jump! Jump!” at the suicidal figure on a hotel roof. Cars slow to a near stop on the highway to gawk at broken bodies next to a collision.

A schoolyard fight instantly draws a circle of spectators. Boxing matches and football games and hockey games and automobile races are telecast daily, attracting millions of cheering fans who give rapt attention to each moment of danger, each angry blow to the face, each broken bone, each knockout, each carrying away of the unconscious or possibly dying contestant. In this fashion, their anger at “society” is defused and focused, instead, on the opposing team. The emperors of Rome devised the Circuses and gladiator contests and public executions by wild beasts for precisely that purpose.

Before jumping to the conclusion that such concepts are absurd in modern times, recall that during the 1985 European soccer championship in Belgium, the spectators became so emotionally involved in the contest that a bloody riot broke out in the bleachers leaving behind 38 dead and more that 400 injured. U.S. News & World Report gives this account:

The root of the trouble: A tribal loyalty to home teams that surpasses an obsession and, say some experts, has become a substitute religion for many. The worst offenders include members of gangs such as Chelsea’s Anti-Personnel Firm, made up of ill-educated young males who find in soccer rivalry an escape from boredom.

Still, the British do not have a patent on soccer violence. On May 26, eight people were killed and more than 50 injured in Mexico City,… a 1964 stadium riot in Lima, Peru, killed more than 300 – and a hotly disputed 1969 match between El Salvador and Honduras led to a week-long shooting war between the two countries, causing hundreds of casualties.

The U.S. is criticized for the gridiron violence of its favorite sport, football, but outbursts in the bleachers are rare because loyalties are spread among many sports and national pride is not at stake. Said Thomas Tutko, professor of psychology at California’s San Jose State University: “In these other countries, it used to be their armies. Now it’s their competitive teams that stir passions.” (5)

Having considered all the ramifications of blood games, The Report from Iron Mountain concluded that they were not an adequate substitute for war. It is true that violent sports are useful distracters and do, in fact, allow an outlet for boredom and fierce group loyalty, but their effect on the nation’s psyche could not match the intensity of war hysteria. Until a better alternative could be found, world government would have to be postponed so that nations could continue to wage war.


In time of war, most citizens uncomplainingly accept their low quality of life and remain fiercely loyal to their leaders. If a suitable substitute for war is to be found, then it must also elicit that same reaction. Therefore, a new enemy must be found that threatens the entire world, and the prospects of being overcome by that enemy must be just as terrifying as war itself. The Report is emphatic on that point:

Allegiance requires a cause; a cause requires an enemy. This much is obvious; the critical point is that the enemy that defines the cause must seem genuinely formidable. Roughly speaking, the presumed power of the “enemy” sufficient to warrant an individual sense of allegiance to a society must be proportionate to the size and complexity of the society. Today, of course, that power must be one of unprecedented magnitude and frightfulness. (6)

The first consideration in finding a suitable threat to serve as a global enemy was that it did not have to be real. A real one would be better, of course, but an invented one would work just as well, provided the masses could be convinced it was real. The public will more readily believe some fictions than others. Credibility would be more important than truth.

Poverty was examined as a potential global enemy but rejected as not fearful enough. Most of the world was already in poverty. Only those who had never experienced poverty would see it as a global threat. For the rest, it was simply a fact of everyday life.

An invasion by aliens from outer space was given serious consideration. The report said that experiments along those lines already may have been tried. Public reaction, however, was not sufficiently predictable, because the threat was not “credible.” Here is what the report had to say:

Credibility, in fact, lies at the heart of the problem of developing a political substitute for war. This is where the space-race proposals, in many ways so well suited as economic substitutes for war, fall short. The most ambitious and unrealistic space project cannot of itself generate a believable external menace. It has been hotly argued that such a menace would offer the “last best hope of peace,” etc., by uniting mankind against the danger of destruction by “creatures” from other planets or from outer space. Experiments have been proposed to test the credibility of an out-of-our-world invasion threat; it is possible that a few of the more difficult-to-explain “flying saucer” incidents of recent years were in fact early experiments of this kind. If so, they could hardly have been judged encouraging. (7)

This report was released in 1966 when the idea of an alien presence seemed far fetched to the average person. In the ensuing years, however, that perception has changed. A growing segment of the population now believes that intelligent life forms may exist beyond our planet and could be monitoring our own civilization. Whether that belief is right or wrong is not the issue here. The point is that a dramatic encounter with aliens shown on network television – even if it were to be entirely fabricated by high-tech computer graphics or laser shows in the sky – could be used to stampede all nations into world government supposedly to defend the Earth from invasion. On the other hand, if the aliens were perceived to have peaceful intent, an alternative scenario would be to form world government to represent a unified human species speaking with a single voice in some kind of galactic federation. Either scenario would be far more credible today than in 1966.


The final candidate for a useful global threat was pollution of the environment. This was viewed as the most likely to succeed because it could be related to observable conditions such as smog and water pollution– in other words, it would be based partly on fact and, therefore, be credible. Predictions could be made showing end-of-earth scenarios just as horrible as atomic warfare. Accuracy in these predictions would not be important. Their purpose would be to frighten, not to inform. It might even be necessary to deliberately poison the environment to make the predictions more convincing and to focus the public mind on fighting a new enemy, more fearful than any invader from another nation – or even from outer space. The masses would more willingly accept a falling standard of living, tax increases, and bureaucratic intervention in their lives as simply “the price we must pay to save Mother Earth.” A massive battle against death and destruction from global pollution possibly could replace war as justification for social control.

Did The Report from Iron Mountain really say that? It certainly did – and much more. Here are just a few of the pertinent passages:

When it comes to postulating a credible substitute for war … the “alternate enemy” must imply a more immediate, tangible, and directly felt threat of destruction. It must justify the need for taking and paying a “blood price” in wide areas of human concern. In this respect, the possible substitute enemies noted earlier would be insufficient. One exception might be the environmental-pollution model, if the danger to society it posed was genuinely imminent. The fictive models would have to carry the weight of extraordinary conviction, underscored with a not inconsiderable actual sacrifice of life. … It may be, for instance, that gross pollution of the environment can eventually replace the possibility of mass destruction by nuclear weapons as the principal apparent threat to the survival of the species. Poisoning of the air, and of the principal sources of food and water supply, is already well advanced, and at first glance would seem promising in this respect; it constitutes a threat that can be dealt with only through social organization and political power. …

It is true that the rate of pollution could be increased selectively for this purpose. … But the pollution problem has been so widely publicized in recent years that it seems highly improbable that a program of deliberate environmental poisoning could be implemented in a politically acceptable manner.

However unlikely some of the possible alternative enemies we have mentioned may seem, we must emphasize that one must be found of credible quality and magnitude, if a transition to peace is ever to come about without social disintegration. It is more probable, in our judgment, that such a threat will have to be invented. (8)


The Report from Iron Mountain states that it was produced by a Special Study Group of fifteen men whose identities were to remain secret and that it was not intended to be made public. One member of the group, however, felt the Report was too important to be kept under wraps. He was not in disagreement with its conclusions. He merely believed that more people should read it. He delivered his personal copy to Leonard Lewin, a well-known author and columnist who, in turn, negotiated its publication by Dial Press. It was then reprinted by Dell Publishing.

This was during the Johnson Administration, and the President’s Special Assistant for National Security Affairs was CFR member Walt Rostow. Rostow was quick to announce that the report was a spurious work. Herman Kahn, CFR director of the Hudson Institute, said it was not authentic. The Washington Post – which was owned and run by CFR member Katharine Graham – called it “a delightful satire.” Time magazine, founded by CFR-member Henry Luce, said it was a skillful hoax.

Then, on November 26, 1967, the Report was reviewed in the book section of the Washington Post by Herschel McLandress, which was the pen name for Harvard professor John Kenneth Galbraith. Galbraith, who also had been a member of the CFR, said that he knew firsthand of the Report’s authenticity because he had been invited to participate in it. Although he was unable to be part of the official group, he was consulted from time to time and had been asked to keep the project a secret. Furthermore, while he doubted the wisdom of letting the public know about the Report, he agreed totally with its conclusions. He wrote:

As I would put my personal repute behind the authenticity of this document, so would I testify to the validity of its conclusions. My reservations relate only to the wisdom of releasing it to an obviously unconditioned public. (9)

Six weeks later, in an Associated Press dispatch from London, Galbraith went even further and jokingly admitted that he was “a member of the conspiracy.”(10)

That, however, did not settle the issue. The following day, Galbraith backed off. When asked about his “conspiracy” statement, he replied: “For the first time since Charles II The Times has been guilty of a misquotation. … Nothing shakes my conviction that it was written by either Dean Rusk or Mrs. Clare Booth Luce.” (11)

The reporter who conducted the original interview was embarrassed by the allegation and did further research. Six days later, this is what he reported: Misquoting seems to be a hazard to which Professor Galbraith is prone. The latest edition of the Cambridge newspaper Varsity quotes the following (tape recorded) interchange:

Interviewer: “Are you aware of the identity of the author of Report from Iron Mountain?”

Galbraith: “I was in general a member of the conspiracy but I was not the author. I have always assumed that it was the man who wrote the foreword – Mr. Lewin.” (12)

So, on at least three occasions, Galbraith publicly endorsed the authenticity of the Report but denied that he wrote it. Then who did? Was it Leonard Lewin, after all? In 1967 he said he did not. In 1972 he said that he did. Writing in The New York Times Book Review Lewin explained: “I wrote the ‘Report,” all of it. … What I intended was simply to pose the issues of war and peace in a provocative way.” (13)

But wait! A few years before that, columnist William F. Buckley told the New York Times that he was the author. That statement was undoubtedly made tongue-in-cheek, but who and what are we to believe? Was it written by Herman Kahn, John Kenneth Galbraith, Dean Rusk, Clare Booth Luce, Leonard Lewin, or William F. Buckley?

In the final analysis, it makes little difference. The important point is that The Report from Iron Mountain, whether written as a think-tank study or a political satire, explains the reality that surrounds us. Regardless of its origin, the concepts presented in it are now being implemented in almost every detail. All one has to do is hold the Report in one hand and the daily newspaper in the other to realize that every major trend in American life is conforming to the blueprint. So many things that otherwise are incomprehensible suddenly become clear: foreign aid, wasteful spending, the destruction of American industry, a job corps, gun control, a national police force, the apparent demise of Soviet power, a UN army, disarmament, a world bank, a world money, the surrender of national independence through treaties, and the ecology hysteria. The Report from Iron Mountain is an accurate summary of the plan that has already created our present. It is now shaping our future.


It is beyond the scope of this study to prove that currently accepted predictions of environmental doom are based on exaggerated and fraudulent “scientific studies.” But such proof is easily found if one is willing to look at the raw data and the assumptions upon which the projections are based. More important, however, is the question of why end-of-world scenarios based on phony scientific studies – or no studies at all – are uncritically publicized by the CFR-controlled media; or why radical environmental groups advocating collectivist doctrine and anti-business programs are lavishly funded by CFR-dominated foundations, banks, and corporations, the very groups that would appear to have the most to lose. The Report from Iron Mountain answers those questions.

As the Report pointed out, truth is not important in these matters. It’s what people can be made to believe that counts. “Credibility” is the key, not reality. There is just enough truth in the fact of environmental pollution to make predictions of planetary doom in the year two-thousand-something seem believable. All that is required is media cooperation and repetition. The plan has apparently worked. People of the industrialized nations have been subjected to a barrage of documentaries, dramas, feature films, ballads, poems, bumper stickers, posters, marches, speeches, seminars, conferences, and concerts. The result has been phenomenal. Politicians are now elected to office on platforms consisting of nothing more than an expressed concern for the environment and a promise to clamp down on those nasty industries. No one questions the damage done to the economy or the nation. It makes no difference when the very planet on which we live is sick and dying. Not one in a thousand will question that underlying premise. How could it be false? Look at all the movie celebrities and rock stars who have joined the movement.

While the followers of the environmental movement are preoccupied with visions of planetary doom, let us see what the leaders are thinking. The first Earth Day was proclaimed on April 22, 1970, at a “Summit” meeting in Rio de Janeiro, attended by environmentalists and politicians from all over the world. A publication widely circulated at that meeting was entitled the Environmental Handbook. The main theme of the book was summarized by a quotation from Princeton Professor Richard A. Falk, a member of the CFR. Falk wrote that there are four interconnected threats to the planet – wars of mass destruction, overpopulation, pollution, and the depletion of resources. Then he said: “The basis of all four problems is the inadequacy of the sovereign states to manage the affairs of mankind in the twentieth century.” (14)

The Handbook continued the CFR line by asking these rhetorical questions: “Are nation-states actually feasible, now that they have power to destroy each other in a single afternoon?… What price would most people be willing to pay for a more durable kind of human organization – more taxes, giving up national flags, perhaps the sacrifice of some of our hard-won liberties?” (15)

In 1989, the CFR-owned Washington Post published an article written by CFR member George Kennan in which he said: “We must prepare instead for … an age where the great enemy is not the Soviet Union, but the rapid deterioration of our planet as a supporting structure for civilized life.” (16)

On March 27, 1990, in the CFR-controlled New York Times, CFR member Michael Oppenheimer wrote: “Global warming, ozone depletion, deforestation and overpopulation are the four horsemen of a looming 21st century apocalypse. … as the cold war recedes, the environment is becoming the No. 1 international security concern.” (17)

CFR member, Lester Brown, heads up another think tank called the Worldwatch Institute. In the Institute’s annual report, entitled State of the World 1991, Brown said that “the battle to save the planet will replace the battle over ideology as the organizing theme of the new world order.” (18)

In the official publication of the 1992 Earth Summit, we find this: “The world community now faces together greater risks to our common security through our impacts on the environment than from traditional military conflicts with one another.”

How many times does it have to be explained? The environmental movement was created by the CFR. It is a substitute for war that they hope will become the emotional and psychological foundation for world government.


The Club of Rome is a group of global planners who annually release end-of-world scenarios based on predictions of overpopulation and famine. Their membership is international, but the American roster includes such well-known CFR members as Jimmy Carter, Harlan Cleveland, Claiburne Pell, and Sol Linowitz. Their solution to overpopulation? A world government to control birth rates and, if necessary, euthanasia. That is a gentle word for the deliberate killing of the old, the weak, and of course the uncooperative. Following the same reasoning advanced at Iron Mountain, the Club of Rome has concluded that fear of environmental disaster could be used as a substitute enemy for the purpose of unifying the masses behind its program. In its 1991 book entitled The First Global Revolution, we find this:

In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. … All these dangers are caused by human intervention. … The real enemy, then, is humanity itself. (19)

Collectivist theoreticians have always been fascinated by the possibility of controlling population growth. It excites their imaginations because it is the ultimate bureaucratic plan. If the real enemy is humanity itself, as the Club of Rome says, then humanity itself must become the target. Fabian Socialist Bertrand Russell expressed it thus:

I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. … War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. …

A scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is world government. … It will be necessary to find ways of preventing an increase in world population. If this is to be done otherwise than by wars, pestilences and famines, it will demand a powerful international authority. This authority should deal out the world’s food to the various nations in proportion to their population at the time of the establishments of the authority. If any nation subsequently increased its population, it should not on that account receive any more food. The motive for not increasing population would therefore be very compelling. (21)

Very compelling, indeed. These quiet-spoken collectivists are not kidding around. For example, one of the most visible “environmentalists” and advocate of population control was Jacques Cousteau. Interviewed by the United Nations UNESCO Courier in November of 1991, Cousteau spelled it out. He said:

What should we do to eliminate suffering and disease? It is a wonderful idea but perhaps not altogether a beneficial one in the long run. If we try to implement it we may jeopardize the future of our species. It’s terrible to have to say this. World population must be stabilized, and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. This is so horrible to contemplate that we shouldn’t even say it, but it is just as bad not to say it. (22)


We can now understand how Mikhail Gorbachev, formerly the leader of one of the most repressive governments the world has known, became head of a new organization called the International Green Cross, which supposedly is dedicated to environmental issues. Gorbachev has never denounced collectivism, only the label of a particular brand of collectivism called Communism. His real interest is not ecology but world government with himself assured a major position in the collectivist power structure. In a public appearance in Fulton, Missouri, he praised the Club of Rome, of which he is a member, for its position on population control. Then he said:

One of the worst of the new dangers is ecological. … Today, global climatic shifts; the greenhouse effect; the “ozone hole”; acid rain; contamination of the atmosphere, soil and water by industrial and household waste; the destruction of the forests; etc. all threaten the stability of the planet. (23)

Gorbachev proclaimed that global government was the answer to these threats and that the use of government force was essential. He said: “I believe that the new world order will not be fully realized unless the United Nations and its Security Council create structures … authorized to impose sanctions and make use of other measures of compulsion.” (24)

Here is an arch criminal who fought his way up through the ranks of the Soviet Communist Party, became the protégé of Yuri Andropov, head of the dreaded KGB, was a member of the USSR’s ruling Politburo throughout the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and who was selected by the Politburo in 1985 as the supreme leader of world Communism. All of this was during one of the Soviet’s most dismal periods of human-rights violations and subversive activities against the free world. Furthermore, he ruled over a nation with one of the worst possible records of environmental destruction. At no time while he was in power did he ever say or do anything to show concern over planet Earth.

All that is now forgotten. Gorbachev has been transformed by the CFR-dominated media into an ecology warrior. He is calling for world government and telling us that such a government will use environmental issues as justification for sanctions and other “measures of compulsion.” We cannot say that we were not warned.


The use of compulsion is an important point in these plans. People in the industrialized nations are not expected to cooperate in their own demise. They will have to be forced. They will not like it when their food is taken for global distribution. They will not approve when they are taxed by a world authority to finance foreign political projects. They will not voluntarily give up their cars or resettle into smaller houses or communal barracks to satisfy the resource-allocation quotas of a UN agency. Club-of-Rome member Maurice Strong states the problem:

In effect, the United States is committing environmental aggression against the rest of the world. … At the military level, the United States is the custodian. At the environmental level, the United States is clearly the greatest risk. … One of the worst problems in the United States is energy prices – they’re too low. …

It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class … involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and `convenience’ foods, ownership of motor-vehicles, numerous electric household appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning … expansive suburban housing … are not sustainable. (25)

Mr. Strong’s remarks were enthusiastically received by world environmental leaders, but they prompted this angry editorial response in the Arizona Republic:

Translated from eco-speak, this means two things: (1) a reduction in the standard of living in Western nations through massive new taxes and regulations, and (2) a wholesale transfer of wealth from industrialized to under-developed countries. The dubious premise here is that if the U.S. economy could be reduced to, say, the size of Malaysia’s, the world would be a better place. … Most Americans probably would balk at the idea of the U.N. banning automobiles in the U.S. (26)

Who is this Maurice Strong who sees the United States as the environmental aggressor against the world? Does he live in poverty? Does he come from a backward country that is resentful of American prosperity? Does he himself live in modest circumstances, avoiding consumption in order to preserve our natural resources? None of the above. He is one of the wealthiest men in the world. He lives and travels in great comfort. He is a lavish entertainer. In addition to having great personal wealth derived from the oil industry in Canada – which he helped nationalize – Maurice Strong was the Secretary-General of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio; head of the 1972 UN Conference on Human Environment in Stockholm; the first Secretary-General of the UN Environment Program; president of the World Federation of United Nations; co-chairman of the World Economic Forum; member of the Club of Rome; trustee of the Aspen Institute; and a director of the World Future Society. That is probably more than you wanted to know about this man, but it is necessary in order to appreciate the importance of what follows.


Maurice Strong believes – or says that he believes – the world’s ecosystems can be preserved only if the affluent nations of the world can be disciplined into lowering their standard of living. Production and consumption must be curtailed. To bring that about, those nations must submit to rationing, taxation, and political domination by world government. They will probably not do that voluntarily, he says, so they will have to be forced. To accomplish that, it will be necessary to engineer a global monetary crisis which will destroy their economic systems. Then they will have no choice but to accept assistance and control from the UN.

This strategy was revealed in the May, 1990, issue of West magazine, published in Canada. In an article entitled “The Wizard of Baca Grande,” journalist Daniel Wood described his week-long experience at Strong’s private ranch in southern Colorado. This ranch has been visited by such CFR notables as David Rockefeller, Secretary-of-State Henry Kissinger, founder of the World Bank Robert McNamara, and the presidents of such organizations as IBM, Pan Am, and Harvard.

During Wood’s stay at the ranch, the tycoon talked freely about environmentalism and politics. To express his own world view, he said he was planning to write a novel about a group of world leaders who decided to save the planet. As the plot unfolded, it became obvious that it was based on real people and real events. Wood continues the story:

Each year, he explains as background to the telling of the novel’s plot, the World Economic Forum convenes in Davos, Switzerland. Over a thousand CEOs, prime ministers, finance ministers, and leading academics gather in February to attend meetings and set economic agendas for the year ahead. With this as a setting, he then says: “What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? … The group’s conclusion is `no.’ the rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about? …

This group of world leaders,” he continues, “form a secret society to bring about an economic collapse. It’s February. They’re all at Davos. These aren’t terrorists. They’re world leaders. They have positioned themselves in the world’s commodity and stock markets. They’ve engineered, using their access to stock exchanges and computers and gold supplies, a panic. Then, they prevent the world’s stock markets from closing. They jam the gears. They hire mercenaries who hold the rest of the world leaders at Davos as hostages. The markets can’t close. The rich countries…” And Strong makes a slight motion with his fingers as if he were flicking a cigarette butt out the window.

I sit there spellbound. This is not any storyteller talking, this is Maurice Strong. He knows these world leaders. He is, in fact, co-chairman of the Council of the World Economic Forum. He sits at the fulcrum of power. He is in a position to do it.“I probably shouldn’t be saying things like this,” he says. (27)

Maurice Strong’s fanciful plot probably shouldn’t be taken too seriously, at least in terms of a literal reading of future events. It is unlikely they will unfold in exactly that manner – although it is not impossible. For one thing, it would not be necessary to hold the leaders of the industrialized nations at gun point. They would be the ones engineering this plot. Leaders from Third-World countries do not have the means to cause a global crisis. That would have to come from the money centers in New York, London, or Tokyo. Furthermore, the masterminds behind this thrust for global government have always resided in the industrialized nations. They have come from the ranks of the CFR in America and from other branches of the International Roundtable in England, France, Belgium, Canada, Japan, and elsewhere. They are the ideological descendants of Cecil Rhodes and they are fulfilling his dream.

It is not important whether or not Maurice Strong’s plot for global economic collapse is to be taken literally. What is important is that men like him are thinking along those lines. As Wood pointed out, they are in a position to do it. Or something like it. If it is not this scenario, they will consider another one with similar consequences. If history has proven anything, it is that men with financial and political power are quite capable of heinous plots against their fellow men. They have launched wars, caused depressions, and created famines to suit their personal agendas. We have little reason to believe that the world leaders of today are more saintly than their predecessors.

Furthermore, we must not be fooled by pretended concern for Mother Earth. The call-to-arms for saving the planet is a gigantic ruse. There is just enough truth to environmental pollution to make the show “credible,” as The Report from Iron Mountain phrased it, but the end-of-earth scenarios which drive the movement forward are bogus. The real objective in all of this is world government, the ultimate doomsday mechanism from which there can be no escape. Destruction of the economic strength of the industrialized nations is merely a necessary prerequisite for ensnaring them into the global web. The thrust of the current ecology movement is directed totally to that end.


by G. Edward Griffin.

It may be obtained at www.realityzone.com.



Leonard Lewin, ed., Report from Iron Mountain on the possibility and the Desirability of Peace

(New York: Dell Publishing, 1976), pp.13-14.


Ibid. pp. 39, 81.


Ibid. p. 9. 3


Ibid., pp. 41-42,68, 70.


“British Soccer’s Day of Shame,” U.S. News & World Report, June 10, 1985, p. 11.


Lewin, Report, p. 44. 6


Ibid., p. 66. 7


Ibid., pp. 66-67, 70-71. When the Report was written, terrorism had not yet been considered as a substitute for war. Since then, it has become the most useful of them all.


“News of War and Peace You’re Not Ready For,” by Herschel McLandress, Book World, in The

Washington Post, Nov. 26, 1967, p. 5.


“The Times Diary,” London Times, Feb. 5, 1968, p.8.


“Galbraith Says He Was Misquoted, “ London Times, Feb. 6, 1968, p. 3.


“Touche, Professor,” London Times, Feb. 12, 1968, p, 8. 9


“Report from Iron Mountain,” New Your Times, March 19, 1968, p. 8. 10


Garrett de Bell, ed., The Environmental Handbook (New York: Ballantine / Friends of the Earth,

1970), p. 138.


Ibid., p. 145.


A Europe Now Free from A Confining Cold War Vision,” by George Kennan, (Washington Post

syndication, Sacramento Bee, Nov. 14, 1989, p. B7.


The New York Times has been one of the principal means by which CFR policies are inserted into

the mainstream of public opinion. The paper was purchased in 1896 by Alfred Ochs, with financial

backing from CFR pioneer J.P. Morgan, Rothchild agent August Belmont, and Jacob Schiff, a partner in Kuhn, Loeb & Co. It is now owned by CFR member Arthur Sulzberger, who is also the

publisher, and it is staffed by numerous CFR editors and columnists. See Shadows of Power by

James Perloff (Appleton, Wisconsin: Western Islands, 1988), p. 181.


Lester R. Brown, “The New World Order,” in Lester R. Brown et al., State of the World 1991; A

Worldwatch Institute Report on Progress Toward A Sustainable Society (New York: W.W. Norton,

1991), p. 3.


Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, The First Global Revolution, A Report by the Council of

the Club of Rome, (New York: Pantheon Books, 1991). P. 115.


See Martin, Rose, Fabian Freeway; High Road to Socialism in the U.S.A. (Boston: Western

Islands, 1966), pp. 171, 325, 463-69.


Bertrand Arthur William Russell, The Impact of Science on Society (New York: Simon and

Schuster, 1953), pp. 103-104, 111.


Interviewed by Bahgat Eluadi and Adel Rifaat, Courrier de l’Unesco, Nov. 1991, p. 13.


Michail Gorbachev, “The River of Time and the Necessity of Action,” 46thJohn Findley Greed

Foundation Lecture, Westminster College, Fulton, Missouri, May 6, 1992, transcript from

Westminster College Department of Press Relations, p. 6.


Ibid., p. 9. 14


“Ecology Remedy Costly,” (AP), Sacramento Bee, March 12, 1992, p. A8. Also Maurice Strong,

Introduction to Jim MacNeil, Pieter Winsemius, and Taizo Yakushiji, Beyond Interdependence,

(New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), p. ix.


“Road to Ruin,” Arizona Republic, March 26, 1992.


“The Wizard of Baca Grande.” By Daniel Wood, West magazine, May 1990, p. 35.




USA Genocide 2021-2025 |Email update from Tom on Project Zyphr, Pogo, 5G & USMCA

Please backup important videos here!

David Goldberg’s close friend and Project Zyphr whistle-blower, Tom (tom2021email@yandex.com – This email was immediately shut down once it was posted, and Tom is working on getting a new email), has provided us an email update. (His latest videos include, USA Genocide 2021-2025 A.D. – Project Zyphr & The End Game – PART 3” and “How to leave the USA Satanic Control Grid“)

Editor’s note: this article will be periodically updated as we receive new emails from Tom on various topics. The newest updates are posted last and bolded.

The following are quotes from a series of email exchanges shared between the Friends of David Goldberg and Tom over the past week:

1) “I can’t emphasize it enough: plan on getting out of the USA if you can. Nowhere in the continental U.S. is remotely safe. Alaska and Hawaii are only marginally safer due to their distance from the main hubs of control and operations. The hinterlands of Canada will offer some measure of safety due to their distance but they still fall under the control grid. They also have too much control in Mexico and if you’ve seen the news, the U.S. has made major inroads in economic and military relations with many Central American countries. Why? To expand Zyphr.”

2) “The USMCA is a total sellout, it’s worse than NAFTA. You’ll see Canada, USA and Mexico combined into one entity, ruled by an E.U.-style authority, which will happen during the economic collapse over a period of years. Now your freedom and national identity is completely gone, while right now you still have a few ounces of it left. Interestingly enough, in this scenario, Canada will still retain a certain level of sovereignty. You will see free travel between the USA and Mexico border, but it will remain very hard for Americans to immigrate to Canada. Even during the economic mess, this will remain in place and is by design.”

3) “A couple of new ops are underway, not sure their names. Watch for two things. You will see a new round of ‘predictions’ via many disinfo YouTube channels announcing dates and times, none of which are accurate. New warnings, nothing but them ‘crying wolf’ again. They are not telling you the real plans, which are Project Pogo and Zyphr. Not a single one is telling you to leave, that is how you know it is disinfo. The second thing to watch for is for world leaders and celebrities to release videos that appear to have been shot or filmed in the USA. They are not filmed there. This may be hard to spot. Many of the elites are moving to the Southern Hemisphere but will maintain a presence up north via fake videos or doubles in their place.”

4) “They are getting more brazen with the overt messaging. You are seeing more releases on Epstein, more hints and talk out of Hollywood about pedophilia, child sacrifice, and some celebrities fairly bold in their commitment to Satanism and the Illuminati. This is why you know the end is getting close, they’re totally unafraid to just put it in your face. It’s part conditioning, part arrogance.”

5) “People can’t get out of the USA because they’re economically strapped and mentally conditioned to never leave. So the steps to get out, I’ll try to provide some more of that in the next video. We’re going to talk about Gangstalking and Safe Zones, those will be the two themes. The simple steps to prepare include getting your passports, documents in order, selling everything you have, figuring out some kind of income stream or income source, researching Argentina, Paraguay, Chile, New Zealand, Tasmania, Western Australia, Ecuador, Peru, Uruguay. Stay the hell out of Brazil, though.”

6) “Western Europe is part of the control grid. They have underground bases there and the surveillance grid has expanded widely in the past few years. It’s going to be hit hard by the economic collapse, too. There are some safe spots. Remote parts of Turkey. Parts of Croatia, Montenegro, think about Moldova, too, there’s less control there, also the northern part of Africa. Morocco used to be a safe zone, but they’ve really stepped up immigration controls recently. Spain is compromised, way too much police control there. The U.K. is also by far the least safe country. Anything under E.U. control isn’t really safe, because every citizen will have to take the microchip if they want to eat.”

7) “My military source told me that on the U.S. Interstates at night, usually between 2 a.m. and 4 a.m., they are closing the freeways and routing traffic through side roads for about a mile or two. This is a test run and it’s happening all over the U.S. the past few months. Anybody talking about it? Nope, it looks like road work. But smart observers have noted there isn’t any visible road work going on. It’s also unusual to see that much road work going on at those times. No, it’s all a test run for funneling traffic during the collapse.”

8) “Watch local police in the USA, they’re getting crazier by the day. More shootings, more out of control behavior. It’s a combination of the training, the militarization of these police, the vaccines they take and most of all, the psychological profiles they’ve been using for over ten years to spit out the good candidates and more or less only hire psychopaths or people who fit a mentally imbalanced criteria. Remember, this is all planned. The police insanity in the USA is no accident. They changed the psych profiles on their hiring process and militarized departments. What do you think is going to happen? They need these goons so they’ll comply with the micro-chipping of Americans, removing their freedom, and in some cases, killing them in cold blood.”

9) “America’s lost, and was never a Christian nation to begin with, since it was founded by Freemasons who worshiped Satan or were deists, or non-believers. All of Washington D.C. is an ode to Moloch and full of Illuminati symbolism in how it was designed. You are trying to ‘save’ something that cannot be saved, and isn’t worth saving. Save yourselves, your families, instead. Their goal is to keep you there, domesticated like cattle, rounded up, easy targets. Getting out at least gives you a chance. If every American woke up and did it, and left, they’d clamp down on that quick, restrict travel right away, but that’s not happening. I’m trying to just reach a few thousand, if I can, if we can. So far it looks like we’re not even reaching that many which might be why they leave the channel up, it’s not a real threat right now, there’s not enough views or people seeing it.”

10) “Christians will be persecuted the most and experience the most severe torture in the underground bases. They’re already persecuted all over the world, but it rarely makes the news. Now keep in mind, the American Christian churches are totally compromised, almost all of them. You might find a few that teach the true Word, which must be read in the original Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek. You can’t rely on the King James version, because there are intentional mistranslated parts in it. These good churches, they don’t teach the Rapture, which is false. They don’t teach prosperity gospel. They instead teach that your role, your life, as a Christian, is persecution, pain and being tested so severely your will and faith will break. That test is coming, but if some Christians do not escape the control grid or the micro-chipping there will be none left.”

11) “The next video I’ll talk about Gangstalking. Viewers need to know this is real and many, many Americans have been terrorized for years by it. We’re going to see that increase dramatically over the next year or two. It’s going to send some people over the edge, right to the nuthouse, if they aren’t prepared for it. The methods they use involve mostly electronics but there are some other things they are using, things discovered using CERN. It’s a torture beyond imagination.”  

12) “My military source gave me another bit of shocking info, which I may share in the next audio. I’m not sure about sharing it, though, because it could for certain get the channel removed. I’m thinking of a way I can say it without the channel getting taken down. It scared the hell out of me. We’re at a point where we’ll have to start using code language.”

13) “QAnon is designed to just distract Patriots for long enough for their plans to be put into place. It’s worked like a charm! It’s a psy op. Keep Patriots satiated, comfortable and believing in Trump. Meanwhile, Trump promotes vaccines, 5G and takes away our free speech with various Executive Orders. No one gets locked up, we’re just distracted with stories where we have to ‘just wait a little longer’ for QAnon to deliver, which they never do.”

14) “5G has to do with infertility, mind control and surveillance. It serves multiple purposes. It is not safe at all, and there will be serious health problems. This is where I think we’ll see a major drop in U.S. total population in line with the Deagle predictions.” 

15) “My military source told me they will begin freezing the bank accounts of hundreds of thousands of Patriots in mid to late 2020, in the run-up for the implementation of Project Zyphr. This will severely hamstring your ability to move, plan, prepare or do anything. This move will be devastating, and will not go reported in the media. There will be an information blackout and the disinfo channels won’t even report on it. This scares me a lot because once your bank account is frozen, you’re going to be in a very desperate position. They’ll also have their legal reasons lined up for it, dozens of judge orders based on your online activities which they will call ‘domestic terrorism’ or a ‘domestic threat’ or come up with some other reason.”

16) “I talked about Bitcoin in my last video and I’ll probably talk about it more. What people need to realize is that once you have Bitcoin they can’t freeze or steal it from you, in the way they can do so with your bank accounts, debit cards and credit cards. Bitcoin is not as easy to spend as cash but it’s still going to be better than having your assets frozen. There’s also some speculation the price may go up in 2020, so buying it now is probably a good idea as it’s not that expensive right now.”

17) “I’m looking into forming some kind of online group so we can all communicate and I’m thinking of sharing my email, or at least a safe email I set up. I have to be really careful with email so I’ll look into something that is encrypted, protected, not linked to me easily. That’s a tall order since all the email companies share all of your emails with the U.S. government, but there are a few that don’t. We might have to look at using code language, other things to make communication safer. I just want to try to dedicate some time each week to helping people and answering emails. I don’t think the videos are enough.”

18) “David spoke a lot about the upcoming scripted war with Iran. It will be part of the scripted ‘World War III’ they have been planning for decades, even centuries. Everyone should listen to some of David’s final videos where he talks about this. Iran’s parliament building is a giant pyramid with 33 windows which represents Freemasonic symbolism. They’re working together on this, Iran is basically a Luciferian vassal used as a convenient boogeyman. David said this exact thing in one of his videos and we talked about it, but no one else is seeing that Iran is a part of this. They’re not seeing the real picture here. There’s also articles in the media today suggesting various ways Iran might retaliate, including the use of missiles striking U.S. and European cities, and the use of pre-positioned nuclear devices. Just today I’ve seen a story of a nuclear device that was supposedly deactivated in Israel. These stories are predictive programming, to prep for the main event or false flag. The bold assassination of Quds Commander Qasem Soleimani sets the stage after seven months of predictive programming to prep the world psychologically for this war. I’m not sure how it will coincide with the controlled collapse, but it may happen in tandem with it. I’ve sent a message to my military source to get an update on what’s going on.


“This is symbolic, the use of the American truck and weapons here. Symbolism is very important to them. You must remember that Iran incurred two American-backed revolutions, one in 1953 and the other in 1979. Who really runs the country? The CIA’s involvement is decades-old in there, and it’s leading up to an ‘End Game’ scenario through a series of scripted events, pitting factions, ideologies against one another. Many rabbis and Israeli leaders want to live long enough to see the day these plans come to fruition, which is soon, they are lusting and salivating for it. The deception is so mind-boggling it is difficult to fully unravel. It’s difficult to know the extent Iran’s leadership is working with the USA, and which part is not. I wish David were alive to see this, to see his many insights and predictions beginning to play out. He taught me a lot about the true nature of the Iran and U.S. situation, which is hidden. Some call it Biblical and prophetic in nature. You must resist any urge promoted through Trump’s manipulations to accept a single word of the liars in the American government. Your consent to evil is how they spiritually gain power over you.” 

Please view Tom’s videos below.

David Goldberg’s close friend, Tom, relates more information on Project Zyphr, Project Pogo, the TTID Program, A.I. Program, a classified food distribution program revealed for the first time, and tips on how to get out of the USA and Northern Hemisphere before the economic collapse coming to these areas in early 2021.


Source Backup

USA GENOCIDE 2021-2025 A.D. – Survival Guide for Project Zyphr – PART 1

Whistle-blower Tom relates more information on Project Zyphr, Project Pogo, the TTID Program, A.I. Program, and tips on how to get out of the USA before the economic collapse coming in 2021. Skip to 12:04 for the Q&A section. Skip to 1:02:52 for life-saving tips. Turning ON “CC” or closed captioning is recommended.

USA GENOCIDE 2021-2025 A.D. – The Collapse & Trump – PART 2

Whistle-blower Tom speaks about threats our channel has received, the upcoming economic collapse and Trump’s true role. Skip to 12:09 for continued discussion of the threats, collapse discussion starts at 20:44, Tom responds to comments at 46:15 and Tom discusses the Trump Presidency starting at 1:02:51

#ProjectZyphr #Trump #DavidGoldberg

USA GENOCIDE 2021-2025 A.D. – Project Zyphr & The End Game – PART 3

Tom discusses Project Zyphr and “The End Game” in detail, along with new updates, info on safe zones and his replies to viewer comments. At 4:50 begins a complete recap of Project Zyphr & Pogo. At 33:59 a discussion on nano chips. At 36:46 options for getting out of the USA. At 45:52 safe zones. At 51:52 Tom addresses viewer comments.

Read our latest blog post, “Email update from Tom on Project Zyphr, Pogo & the USMCA”: https://israeltodaynews.blogspot.com/2019/12/tom-project-zyphr-pogo-david-goldberg.html

#IranWar #Soleimani #FalseFlag

USA GENOCIDE 2021-2025 A.D. – Trump’s Iran War, Gangstalking & Disinfo – PART 4

Whistle-blower Tom discusses the Iran War situation and Trump’s murder of General Soleimani, his email address at 11:31, American gun sales at 13:36, Gangstalking at 18:55, Ricky Gervais Golden Globes speech at 26:03, how disinfo psyops works at 31:46 and Alex Jones at 40:19.

Tom’s email was immediately shut down once it was posted and it does not work. Tom is working on getting a new email.

#ProjectZyphr #Trump #DavidGoldberg

How to leave the USA Satanic Control Grid – Save your family & your life

Whistle-blower Tom discusses steps on how to leave the United States before the coming economic collapse and before Project Zyphr is fully implemented.

USA GENOCIDE 2021-2025 A.D. – Survival Guide for Project Zyphr will be a 10-Part series of videos. Please view our channel for previous videos for context.

As Friends of David Goldberg, we share no political view or bias. Our purpose is to follow David’s instructions and present the information left to us. We make no claim as to the truth or veracity of these claims. Hostile, threatening comments will be removed.

Oliver Janich, Ron Paul, die Pan-Europa-Bewegung und die Mont Pelerin Society

Die Partei der Vernunft

Es gibt ja immer noch Menschen, die meinen man könnte sich in der BRD einer Partei anschließen und etwas verändern. Was verändern werden sie damit sogar, nämlich werden sie mehr Kraft ins Leere fließen lassen. Oliver Janich, der Gründer dieser Partei schrieb im Focus Money zwei Artikel über den 11.September 2001, die laut seinen Worten wohl irgendwie durch die Zensur gerutscht sind (wers glaubt wird seelig!). Auf jeden Fall wurde Oliver Janich von Focus Money entlassen und bekam keine Aufträge mehr. Sein Buch “Der Kapitalismus-Komplott” wurde kurz danach auch in manchen alternativen Kreisen beworben, komisch ist nur, dass Herr Janich dieses Buch kurz nach seinem Rauswurf veröffentlichte und in dieser kurzen Zeit kann Herr Janich niemals dieses Werk geschrieben haben, das weiß jeder, der selbst schriftstellerisch tätig ist. Die Idee zur Gründung dieser Partei muss also schon vor dem Focus-Money-Artikel bestanden haben. Ich möchte die Sache recht kurz halten und nur ein paar Zitate aus Janichs Buch bringen, damit sie sehen, mit was sie es hier zu tun haben:
“Bevor wir zur wichtigen Rolle des Zinses kommen, muss ich mich mit einem Mythos aufräumen, der derzeit im Internet Furore macht: Angeblich sei der Zins an allem schuld. Vor allem der Zinseszins sei von großem Übel. Sie werden sich schwertun, im Internet einen Artikel zu finden, der ihnen leicht verständlich erklärt, warum das Unsinn ist.” S.56
“Vermutlich hat dieses Zinsverbot mehr Elend über die Welt gebracht als alle Religionskriege. Noch heute leiden die islamischen Länder darunter, warum sie mittlerweile den Zins durch die Hintertür wieder eingeführt haben. Der Vorsprung der westlichen Welt ist mindestens zu einem Teil darauf zurückzuführen, dass das Zinsverbot im Christentum schneller wieder fallengelassen wurde.” S.57
Zum Thema Goldwährung meint Janich: “Noch ein Einwand kommt gerne: Was ist, wenn eine kleine Gruppe von Leuten alles Gold hortet? Erstens wird das nicht passieren und zweitens wäre es auch egal.” S.61
“Am Zins wird gerne kritisiert, dass er etwas Böses sei, weil der Verleiher nicht dafür arbeiten muss. Das ist ein seltsamer Gedanke … . Selbstverständlich erbringt der Geldverleiher eine Leistung. Erstens musste er sich vorher das Geld erarbeiten, das er da verleiht. Zweitens verzichtet er darauf zu konsumieren.” S.62

“Auch die Nationalsozialisten (Video! NaZi = National Zionist) verdammten schon den “jüdischen Wucherzins“, was leider offensichtlich selbst in Deutschland keinen Verdacht mehr erregt.” [Zinskritiker = Nazis] S.63

“Die Oligarchen und die Chefs der Russenmafia können nicht ausscheren, weil sie dem KGB bekannt sind. … Oligarchen, die ihre liebe zur echten Marktwirtschaft oder zur Politik entdecken oder Geheimnisse verkaufen wollen, wie Chodorkowski, werden unter einem Vorwand – in diesem Fall der Vorwurf der Steuerhinterziehung – eingesperrt.” S.335
“[Es] gibt mit absoluter Sicherheit keine islamische, christliche oder jüdische Weltverschwörung.” S.337
“Es ist noch nicht einmal möglich, eine freimaurerische Verschwörung zu unterstellen. Die Freimaurerei verfolgt ähnlich wie die Religionen einen humanitären Ansatz.” S.337
“Die Elite wird versuchen, den Zins als Übel darzustellen, und hätte viele Menschen, die den Unsinn glauben, auf ihrer Seite.” S.439
“Der statistische Zusammenhang zwischen muslimischen Einwanderern und gescheiterter Integration ist eine Scheinkorrelation. Vom Islam wissen wir, dass es sich um eine anerkannte Weltreligion handelt.” (Netzseite: Partei der Vernunft – Der Fall Sarrazin: Teile und Herrsche)

Wohlgemerkt: Infokrieg macht noch Werbung für diesen Darsteller!


  1. Januar 2012

von Autarkes-Rattelsdorf

In Deutschland gründete Oliver Janich die „Partei der Vernunft“, die angeblich wirklich eine Alternative gegen das globale NWO-System anbieten will. Ich hatte an anderer Stelle schon einige Zitate aus Janichs Buch gebracht, die mir nicht gerade zugesagt haben (HIER), um es höflich auszudrücken. Eigentlich hatte sich das Thema Oliver Janich für mich erledigt, aber nachdem ich hörte, dass auch der angebliche „alternative“ US-Präsidentschaftskandidat Ron Paul (Freimaurer) ein Anhänger der „Österreichischen Nationalökonomie“ ist und sogar mehrere Bücher über das Thema veröffentlicht hat, begann ich hellhörig zu werden. Denn auch Herr Janich ist ein Anhänger dieser Österreichischen Nationalökonomie, wie unschwer aus seinem Buch zu erkennen ist. Die Österreichische Nationalökonomie verschweigt das Zinsproblem und wirbt für einen desaströsen Goldstandard. Dieses System stellt keine wirkliche Alternative da, sondern diese Wirtschaftstheorie ist das alte System in anderen Kleidern. Ich musste mich also näher mit der Österreichischen Schule beschäftigen. Nun möchte ich ihnen erstmal die wichtigsten Personen der Österreichen Schule vorstellen.
Carl Menger (1840 – 1921)
Er wird heute als erster Vertreter der Österreichischen Schule gesehen. Bekannt wurde er für seine Wert- und Preistheorien. In dem Buch „Die Habsburger Monarchie 1848 – 1918“ von Wolfdieter Bihl wird Menger als einer der prominentesten Juden seiner Zeit aufgeführt.
Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk (1852 – 1914)
Er ergänzte Mengers Lehre um eine subjektivistische Kapitaltheorie, wonach der Kapitalzins in einem Marktprozess zwischen Individuen mit unterschiedlichen Zeitpräferenzen entsteht. Der Eigentümer von Kapital verzichte auf Konsum in der Gegenwart, um als Gegenleistung für seinen Verzicht den Zins zu erhalten. Bawerk gehörte zur ersten Generation der Österreichischen Schule. Ob Böhm-Bawerk ein Jude war, ist heute Streitfrage und ungeklärt.
Friedrich von Hayek (1899 – 1992)
Der jüdische Nobelpreisträger entwickelte die Kapitaltheorie der Österreichischen Schule weiter und stellte sie der Wirtschaftstheorie des Herrn Keynes gegenüber. Er war einer der wichtigsten Weichensteller für die Philosophie des Liberalismus und des Neo-Liberalismus.
Ludwig von Mises (1881 – 1973)
Die wichtigste Person in der Österreichischen Schule war der Jude Ludwig von Mises, er baute auf der Basis seiner Vorgänger eine Geld- und Konjunkturtheorie auf. Er erklärte Konjunkturzyklen mit der Verzerrung des Produktionsprozesses durch die Geldschöpfung der Zentralbanken, die durch zu niedrige Zinsen überhöhte Investitionen anregen.
In der Österreichischen Schule spielten viele andere Juden eine wichtige Rolle: Fritz Machlup, Murray Rothbard, Joseph Neuwirth, Moritz Benedikt, Otto Neurath, Otto Bauer … . In dem Buch „Vienna and the Jews, 1867-1938“ kann man über das private Mises-Seminar (Teil der Österreichischen Schule), das auch entscheidend bei der Erfindung des Liberalismus geholfen hat, lesen:

„Das private Mises-Seminar wurde das neue Zentrum der Österreichischen Schule, hier war auch der Ort wo sich Friedrich von Hayek profilieren musste. In Mises‘ Memoiren wird eine Liste aller Teilnehmer aufgeführt. Laut verschiedenen Quellen, die wichtigste davon Professor Martha Steffy Browne, einer Teilnehmerin des Seminars, waren von den 29 Teilnehmer 23 Juden (79%). Ironischerweise werden einige der bekanntesten Juden (Gottfried von Haberler, Hayek, Oskar Morgenstern) auf der Liste als Nichtjuden aufgeführt.“

Eustace Mullins schreibt in seinem Buch „The Rule of the Order“ über den Juden Montagu Norman (seiner Zeit Chef der englischen Zentralbank) und wie er versucht mithilfe der Österreichischen Nationalökonomie die einzelnen Nationalstaaten zu untergraben und eine Art Globalisierung einzuleiten (1926). Er wollte die alte Finanzordnung durch die Theorien der Österreichischen Schule ersetzen und somit eine Neue Weltordnung einleiten. Anscheinend wurde schon damals der Unfug als Lösung angeboten! Aber den eigentlichen Hammer schreibt Mullins kurze Zeit später und den möchte ich komplett zitieren:

„Entscheidend für die Absichten von Montagu Norman war die Österreichische Schule, selbst ein Auswuchs der Pan-Europa-Bewegung (!!!). Margit Herzfeld berichtet in ihrer Biographie über Ludwig von Mises (wichtigster Vertreter der Österreichischen Schule), dass er Mitglied in der Pan-Europa-Bewegung des Grafen Coudenhove-Kalergi war (!!!) (1943). Er wurde 1940 durch Erlaubnis der Rockefeller Stiftung (!!!) nach Amerika gebracht, um für 2500 Dollar im Monat für das „National Bureau of Economic Research“ zu arbeiten.“

Fassen wir das kurz zusammen: Oliver Janich und Ron Paul befürworten eine alternative „Lösung“ für die Bankenkrise (Systemkrise), die eindeutig von Rockefeller finanziell unterstützt wurde (denn später wurde Ludwig von Mises ein führender Kopf in der Mont Pelerin Society!), Verzweigungen in die Pan-Europa-Bewegung hat, welche uns die kriminelle EU erst eingebrockt hat (!!!) und schon einmal von einem jüdischen Bänker als Lösung (1926) angeboten wurde, mit dem Hintergedanken die Menschen auszuplündern und nicht zu retten (wie man es ausführlich bei Eustace Mullins nachlesen kann).
Später wurde die Mont Pelerin Society (eine wichtige Denkfabrik des zionistischen Westens) der Hauptsammelpunkt für die Ideen der Österreichischen Schule, wo sie bis heute überlebt haben, um als falsche Lösungen durch Oliver Janich (Freimaurer???) und Ron Paul (Freimaurer) unter die Menge gebracht zu werden.




#PanEuropa #Kalergi #IB #OliverJanich

Der Geheimbund »Unabhängiger jüdischer Orden B’nai Brith« (U.O.B.B.), dessen Name übersetzt »Söhne des Bundes« lautet, wurde 1843 in New York gegründet.

Der Geheimbund »Unabhängiger jüdischer Orden B’nai Brith« (U.O.B.B.) nimmt nur Juden auf. Sein Programm dient der Interessenvertretung jüdischer Bürger in der ganzen Welt und der Förderung ihrer ethischen Erziehung. Der Orden »Unabhängiger jüdischer Orden B’nai Brith« (U.O.B.B.) wird zentral aus den USA geleitet. Es gibt dort sieben Distriktslogen, in anderen Ländern bestehen weitere zehn Distrikts-Großlogen, die in Logen gegliedert sind.

Die Distrikts-Großloge Deutschland des Geheimbundes »Unabhängiger jüdischer Orden B’nai Brith« (U.O.B.B.) wurde bereits 1882 gegründet. Der Orden hat ein eigenes Erkennungszeichen, seine Struktur umfasst drei rituelle Grade, die die Mitglieder allmählich erwerben. Den Logen sind Frauenvereinigungen und Jugendbünde angegliedert.

Der B’nai-Brith ist ein Männerbund innerhalb der jüdischen Glaubensgemeinschaft.

Obwohl der Geheimbund »Unabhängiger jüdischer Orden B’nai Brith« (U.O.B.B.) selbst jegliche politische Tätigkeit bestreitet, vertreten jedoch mehrere Publikationen eine gegenteilige Ansicht. Sein Einfluss auf die internationale Politik soll nicht unerheblich sein. Der jüdische Geheimbund zählt heute weltweit an die 350.000 Mitglieder, davon leben etwa 300.000 in den USA.

Juden in der Freimaurerei | Jews in Masonry

Juden in der Freimaurerei

#Qanon ist #Tyler siehe auch Video weiter unten


Die Freimaurerei 

(seltener auch Maurerei oder Masoney, engl. freemasonry, franz. franc-maçonnerie)

ist eine international agierende, einflußreiche und überstaatliche Vereinigung, welche öffentlich das Streben nach hohen Menschheitszielen wie Humanität, Toleranz, Brüderlichkeit, Selbstlosigkeit und Gemeinnützigkeit zur Schau trägt. Die Mitglieder bilden Gemeinschaften (Logen) und verwenden Symbole, Gebräuche und Bilder, die oft dem Maurerhandwerk, dem Alten Testament und der ägyptischen Mythologie entnommen sind. In gängigen Darstellungen erwecken Freimaurer den Eindruck, daß ihre „königliche Kunst“ auf das Wissen der alten Ägypter zurückgehe.

Zirkel und Winkel: Das weltweite Erkennungs- und Abzeichen der Freimaurerei

Die Stellung der Freimaurerei zwischen den Glaubenslehren

Obwohl es Christgläubigen streng verboten ist, Götzen zu folgen, sich gegen das ausformulierte Glaubensbekenntnis des Neuen Testaments zu stellen, folgten hohe und höchste Repräsentanten in den entstehenden europäischen Nationalstaaten schon seit dem 18. Jahrhundert der Freimaurer-Lehre. Sie fühlten scheinbar keinerlei Bedenken und keinerlei inneren Widerstand dabei, als gläubige Christen (oder als in der Öffentlichkeit das Christentum repräsentierende Fürsten, Gelehrte und Großbürger) sich Freimaurer-Logen anzuschließen. Außerchristliche Riten zu feiern – und solche Glaubensinhalte als „höhere“, geheimzuhaltende Wahrheit anzuerkennen, die Christen, Moslems und Juden eigentlich verboten sind –, ist Teil des Freimaurerlebens.

Es zählt dazu auch, fremde Gottheiten und Götzenbilder anzubeten, sowie fremde magische Siglen als Talismane zu verwenden. Sowohl Moslem-Führer als auch namhafte Christen fanden sich einst und finden sich jetzt in Hochgrad-Freimaurerlogen. Aber weder LuzifersLicht, noch babylonische oder altägyptische Gottheiten sind Teil der christlichen Glaubenslehre. Indem die Freimaurerei die christliche Lehre schnöde und herablassend als „Fabelei“ (in den Worten der Okkultistin Helena P. Blavatsky) behandelt, stellt sie sich selber stillschweigend über sie; die sogenannte „Toleranz“ der Freimaurer ist also nichts anderes als ein verheimlichter Machtanspruch, ein verheimlichtes Hegemonialziel. Die Auffassung von christlichen Dogmen als bloßer „Fabelei“ entspricht zwar dem Elite-Bewußtsein der gesellschaftlich privilegierten Freimaurer, sie hat aber keinen religiösen Zusammenhang mit den christlichen Lehren. So gesehen ist das Freimaurerlogentum eine länderübergreifende Sekte.

Die Freimaurer-Tradition ist in einem speziellen Sinn tatsächlich uralt, als sie einer jahrtausendealten Tendenz der Geschichte entspricht, synkretistisch Material aus untergegangenen Hochreligionen religiös nachzuverwerten. Nicht die magischen Anschauungen selber sind authentisch, aber der mit diesen Aussagen verknüpfte Sezessions-Anspruch. Es gibt in unserem Kulturkreis also tatsächlich einen heimlichen Siegeszug von uralten Sekten, die sich Teile der Konkursmasse von Glaubensformen des antiken Rom, Ägyptens, Babylons und jüdisch-mystischer Traditionen anverwandelt haben. Ein vorherrschender Zweck dieser halb im Geheimen, halb in der Öffentlichkeit agierenden Elite-Religion ist die Etablierung einer tyrannischen Weltregierung im Sinne einer Neuen Weltordnung (NWO), die Schaffung eines Einheits-Weltreichs. Und auch die Bereitstellung überlegener Taktiken, um in der direkten Machtentscheidung persönliche Konkurrenten auszumanövrieren, die nicht zu den Verschwörern zählen, leistet die Freimaurer-Verschwörung effektiv.



Als sichtbare Organisation ist die Freimaurerei aus den Tempelrittern hervorgegangen, der Gründungsort ist die Kapelle von Rosslyn. Traditionelle Bestandteile reichen bis ins alte Ägypten zurück. Die Mitarbeiter beim Bau der Kapelle nannten sich Brüder, übten bei der Aufnahme einen Ritus und verpflichteten sich zur Geheimhaltung. Um sich zu verständigen, griffen sie auf geheime Merkmale und Zeichen zurück.

In London bildete sich 1717 ein Bund, der sich „die Kunst des winkelrechten Bauens an der Vervollkommnung des eigenen Ichs und der gesamten Menschheit“ zum Ziel seiner Bestrebung und Tätigkeit gesetzt hatte. Er nannte sich Bund der „Freimaurer“ (engl. Loge). Spätere Konstitutionsbeschlüsse legten fest, daß der Bund frei von Schranken sei, also ohne Rücksicht auf Nationalität, Farbe und Rasse und der religiösen und politischen Anschauung.

Es entstanden in fast allen Nationen Freimaurer-Logen. Nach der Gleichstellung der Judenu. a. in England und Frankreich traten diese verstärkt den Logen bei.

Die menschheitsbeglückenden Ideen sowie gesellschaftlicher Ehrgeiz führten dazu, daß es zum guten Ton der Angehörigen höherer Schichten gehörte, Mitglied der Freimaurerloge zu sein. So kam es, daß Freimaurer bald fast alle führenden Stellen in Politik und Wirtschaft vereinigten.

Die Freimaurerei nahm sich das Recht und sah es als ihre Pflicht an, Revolutionen zu fördern oder selbst hervorzurufen. Die Französische Revolution 1789 war die erste Revolution, die nach den Plänen der Freimaurerei verlief. Bis 1790 waren in Frankreich ca. 700 Logen entstanden. Der 14. Juli, der Tag des Bastillesturms, wurde zum Feiertag der Weltloge erklärt. Einer der berühmtesten Freimaurer, Quartier la Tente, gab auf dem zweiten internationalen Freimaurerkongreß in Paris im Jahre 1900 unumwunden zu, daß das Hauptziel der Weltfreimaurerei sei, die Welt aus den Angeln zu heben. Als Endziel bezeichnete er die Errichtung der Weltrepublik.

Der VS-amerikanische Freimaurer Woodrow Wilson mit seinen tschechischen Freimaurerbrüdern Masaryk, Klofac und Kramar auf einer antideutschenHetzkarte


Die Einkreisung des Deutschen Reichesim Ersten Weltkriege war das Werk der Weltfreimaurerei, um wie behauptet die „freimaurerischen Ideale“ zu bewahren und durchzusetzen.

Einer der Kriegshetzer war der Hochgradfreimaurer König Eduard VII.von England. Mit der hauptsächlich duch Marxisten organisierten Novemberrevolte von 1918 strömten neue politische Ideen nach Deutschland. Die Freimaurerei hat im Reiche durch ihre Vertreter Friedrich Ebert, Philipp Scheidemann, Kurt Eisner, Karl Liebknecht, Walther Rathenau, der Hochgradfreimaurer war, die „Novemberrevolution“ inszeniert und das Deutsche Volk in maßloses Elend geführt. Vor allem wurden der Nationalsozialismus und andere völkische und nationale Bewegungen bekämpft. Die Thule-Gesellschaft um Rudolf von Sebottendorf war logenähnlich aufgebaut, einige wenige NSDAP-Mitglieder waren auch in anderen Logen organisiert. Das Dritte Reichzerschlug offiziell die Freimaurerei, da es sich um einen „gefährlichen jüdischen Weltorden“ handele und es keine fremdartigen Geheimgesellschaften im neuen Reich geben dürfe.

Am 17. August 1935 ordnete Innenminister Wilhelm Frick das Verbot der Freimaurerei in Deutschland an. In Erlangen und Chemnitz wurden Logenmuseen eingerichtet, die der Volksaufklärung dienten.

In Deutschland waren in den 1930er Jahren ca. 80.000 Männer in Logen organisiert. Heute sind ca. 14.000 Männer in 470 aktiven Logen organisiert. Darüber hinaus arbeiten etwa 50 liberale Logen und Logen angeblich ohne jede Anerkennung einer Großloge in der BRD. Die Propaganda Due war bis 1982 eine verbrecherische Freimaurer-Geheimloge, die Wirtschaft, Polizei, Geheimdienste und Politik infiltrierte.

Es wurde und wird oft behauptet, daß es auch judengegnerische Freimaurerlogen in Deutschland gab. So soll die Große Landesloge judenfeindlich eingestellt gewesen sein. Dies ist jedoch falsch. Artikel „Antideutscher Internationalismus“ am 1. Mai 1926:

„Man kann ein sehr guter Deutscher sein, Freimaurer ist man aber erst dann, wenn man seine freimaurerische Überzeugung nicht auf den deutsch-vaterländischen Standpunkt der Enge und Kleinheit stellt, sondern wenn man eine Plattform findet, auf der auch der andere stehen kann, wenn man ein Mann der Auslese, ein deutscher Jude ist.“

Die Große Landesloge war ebensowenig antijudaistisch wie irgendeine andere Großloge in Deutschland oder in der Welt.


Einem Bericht des französischen Magazins „L’Express“ zufolge hat sich die Zahl der Freimaurer in Frankreich seit 1970 vervierfacht. 2011 gehörten mehr als 160.000 Personen französischen Freimaurer-Logen an. Pro Jahr würden 3.500 weitere Franzosen Mitglied.[1]

Juden in der Freimaurerei

Das Judentum fand zum 18. Jahrhundert mit der – in Gesinnung und Habitus seit je – erzjüdischen Freimaurerei ein entscheidenes Mittel, um die nationale Politik und später die Weltpolitik entscheidend für seine Wünsche und Ziele zu beeinflussen. Dank der Freimaurerei erreichten die Juden Gleichstellung mit den Bürgern und konnten öffentliche Ämter bekleiden.

Der Rabbiner Dr. Isaak Wise erklärte in der Zeitschrift „Israelite of America“ vom 3. August 1866:

„Die Freimaurerei ist eine jüdische Institution. Jüdisch sind ihre Geschichte, ihre Grade, ihre Haltung und ihre Aussagen von Anfang bis Ende.“

Die freimaurerische Zeitschrift „Le Symbolisme“ aus Frankreich schrieb 1928:

„Es wird der erste Akt der Freimaurerei sein, die jüdische Rasse zu glorifizieren, die den göttlichen Gehalt des Wissens unverändert aufbewahrt. Dann werden sie sich auf die jüdische Rasse stützen, um die Grenzen auszulöschen.“

Das Judentum erstrebt den Weltjudenstaat, d. h. nach Zerstörung aller souveränen Nationalstaaten die Zusammenfassung aller Menschen in einem Weltstaat, der, aus Wirtschaftsprovinzen zusammengesetzt, unter zentraler jüdischer Leitung stehen soll. Walther Rathenau hat dieses jüdische Endziel in seinem Buch „Der Kaiser“[2] mit klassischen Worten gezeichnet:

„In hundert Jahren hat die französische Revolution den Kreis der Erde umschritten und sich restlos verwirklicht. Kein Staat, keine Verfassung, keine Gesellschaft, kein Herrscherhaus blieb vor ihr bewahrt. Ihr pathetischer Gedanke war: Freiheit und Gleichheit. Ihr unausgesprochener Wunschgedanke war: Befreiung des Kleinbürgers. Ihr unbewußter, wahrer und praktischer Gedanke war: Verdrängung der feudalen Vorherrschaft durch die kapitalistische Bourgeoisie unter Staatsform des plutokratisch-konstitutionellen Regiments. Der pathetische Gedanke der russischen Revolution ist Menschheit. Der Wunschgedanke: Diktatur des (zeitweiligen) Proletariats und idealisierter Anarchismus. Der praktische Zukunftsgedanke: Aufhebung der europäischen Schichtung unter der Staatsform soziallierender Freistaaten. In einem Jahrhundert wird der praktische Gedanke des Ostens so restlos verwirklicht sein, wie heute der praktische Gedanke des Westens. Im Hintergrunde der Zeiten steht wartend ein letzter Gedanke: die Auflösung der Staatsformen und ihre Ersetzung durch ein bewegliches System selbstverwaltender Kulturverbände unter der Herrschaft transzendenter Idee. Dieser Gedanke aber setzt eine veränderte Stufe der Geistigkeit voraus.“

Symbole, Zeremonien und Kleidung

Überprüft der Freimaurer die Symbole, die Zeremonien, die Kleidung des Ordens, wird er entdecken, daß in der Freimaurerei alles jüdisch ist:

  1. Hiram, dessen Tod gerächt werden muß
  2. Salomon, dessen Tempel wieder aufzubauen ist
  3. Die babylonische Gefangenschaft, aus der es zu befreien gilt
  4. Die Bezugnahme auf Abraham, Judith und Ester
  5. Die Quelle von Siloa in Juda
  6. Jehova, der jüdische Gottesname
  7. Die mit der mosaischen identische Chronologie
  8. Zorobabel, der jüdische Anführer bei der Rückkehr aus der babylonischen Gefangenschaft
  9. Die pompösen Titel, die sie einander in den Hochgraden geben: Ritter des Orients, Großpontifex von Jerusalem, usw.
  10. Die beiden Säulen Jakim und Boaz, die sich am Logeneingang befinden, stehen für Israel und Juda, die Vereinigung der beiden Reiche. Derjenige, der dieser Gesellschaft beitritt, hört von nichts anderem mehr reden als von Personen, Dingen oder Geschehnissen, die einen Bezug auf die Juden haben![3]

Freimaurer und Politik

Goethe war in seiner Eigenschaft als hoher Beamter von seinem Fürsten in die Loge entsandt worden, um diese – insbesondere nach eventuellen staatsgefährdenden Umtrieben – auszuspionieren.

Die Freimaurerei bestreitet seit ewigen Zeiten und ohne nachlassende Vehemenz, politisch tätig zu sein. Das ist für die „Geschäftsmaurerei“ der Johannisgrade (das sind die untersten drei Grade: Lehrling, Geselle, Meister) auf kommunaler Ebene nicht einmal die halbe Wahrheit und bezogen auf die Hochgrade und die „große Politik“ eine freche Lüge.

Welchen Einfluß Freimaurer ausüben, beweisen die vielen Mordanschläge freimaurerischer Anarchisten auf Monarchen und politisch unbequeme Persönlichkeiten. 1894 starb Zar Alexander der Dritte einen rätselhaften Tod. Im selben Jahr kam es zu vier Mordanschlägen gegen den französischen Staatspräsidenten Marie François Sadi Carnot durch den italienischen Anarchisten Sante Geronimo Caserio. Carnot, selbst Freimaurer, hatte die Einkreisungspolitik gegen Deutschland durch den Geheimvertrag mit Rußland maßgeblich vorangetrieben, vermochte jedoch durch seine große Volksbeliebtheit die radikalere Politik des französischen Freimaurerführers Théophile Delcassé zu verhindern. Am 23. Juni starb er an den Folgen einer Stichwunde. Am 8. August wurde der spanische Ministerpräsident Don Antonio Cánovas del Castillo ermordet, ebenfalls Freimaurer, der sich den Wünschen seiner Logenbrüder immer mehr entzogen hatte. Am 10. September 1898 wurde Kaiserin Elisabeth von Österreich-Ungarn durch den „Anarchisten“ Luigi Lucheni ermordet, am 29. Juli 1900 König Humbert von Italien und am 6. September der amerikanische Präsident William McKinley durch den „Anarchisten“ Leon Czolgosz. Das Todesurteil gegen Erzherzog Franz Ferdinand von Österreich-Este sprachen okkulte Hochgradfreimaurer in Frankreich bereits 1911 aus. Der Erzherzog erfuhr 1912 davon und ließ durch einen höheren Beamten des ungarischen Ministeriums, von Kleeberg, die Freimaurer seines Landes überwachen. Doch von Kleeberg war selbst Freimaurer. Er hatte sich vor seiner Loge eidlich zu Gehorsam und Verschwiegenheit verpflichtet. Schließlich haben die Freimaurer 1914 durch das Attentat von Sarajevo auf den Erzherzog den Ersten Weltkrieg begonnen.[4]

Als Gustav Stresemann, Kanzler und Außenminister des Deutschen Reiches, im Oktober 1929 begraben wurde, hielt sein freimaurerischer Großmeister, der Pastor Dr. Karl Habicht, einen Nachruf, in dem es wörtlich hieß: „Überhaupt ist von Stresemann zu sagen, daß er, der große Staatsmann mit dem weiten Blicke, sich als ein seiner Großloge untergeordnetes Glied dadurch bewährte, daß er, sobald freimaurerische Fragen auf der Tagesordnung standen, seien es Fragen der internationalen Beziehungen oder sonstige Fragen, ehe er seine Entschließung traf, mich um Rat und Richtlinien fragte.“

VIDEO Q anon #Tyler der Türwächter – Israel you never walk alone


Wahrheitsbewegung: Keine Macht den Lügen und den Logen

Die Freimaurerei ist seit ihrem Bestehen auf scharfe Gegnerschaft gestoßen. Eine Feindschaft mit der Freimaurerei besteht heute hauptsächlich in nationalen und völkischen Kreisen, früher traten oft Katholiken den Logen entgegen. Der Geheimbund der Freimaurer wurde u. a. in den 1920er/30er Jahren in Ungarn, Portugal und Italien verboten. Der Nationalsozialismus lehnte den Freimaurerbund ab, er wurde demnach 1933–1935 offiziell im Deutschen Reichbeseitigt.

In England wurde die Freimaurerei von den Scald Miserables bekämpft, in Italienvon den Zappatori, der Antifreimaurerliga Gullimo Luigi, der Lega antimassonica und der Union générale antimaconnique, in den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika von der Anti-Masonicparty, in Frankreich von dem Comité anti-maçonnique de Paris und der Ligue de défense nationale contre la francmaçonnerie.

Die Morgan-Affäre in Nordamerika führte von 1826 an durch ein volles Jahrzehnt zu schweren wohlbegründeten Freimaurerverfolgungen. William Morgan wollte ein Werk über die Freimaurerei herausgeben. Morgan wurde von freimaurerischen Offizieren entführt und wahrscheinlich umgebracht. Die Täter wurden zu Gefängnis verurteilt. Diese Affäre führte zur Gründung der Anti-Masonic-Party, die zwar in der Präsidentschaftswahl scheiterte, aber die Gouverneurswahlen in Neuyork und Vermont gewinnen konnte.

VS-Präsident John F. Kennedy sagte in einer Rede, daß einige Leute es gerne sähen, wenn der VS-Präsident nur der Ehren-Vorsitzende einer „großen bruderschaftlichen Organisation“ sei.[5] Er sehe dies jedoch nicht so und gedenke, sein Amt im Interesse des Volkes auszuüben. Kennedy wurde sodann 1963 im Amt ermordet.


In Deutschland hatten sich „Antimassonische Sozietäten“ gebildet, die aber nicht freimaurerisch waren; sie waren ähnlich wie die Freimaurerverbände aufgebaut, nahmen auch Frauen auf und beschränkten sich auf adlige Mitglieder. Da die deutschen Fürsten zum großen Teil selbst Freimaurer waren und die preußische Großloge unter dem Schutz der Hohenzollern stand, konnte sich eine ernste Gegnerschaft nicht entwickeln, obwohl die katholische Kirche nie ihren Kampf dagegen aufgab; auch Protestanten wie der Theologieprofessor Pfarrer Ernst Wilhelm Hengstenberg und der Generalsuperintendent Johann Friedrich Möller erblickten in ihr eine Gefahr für die Kirche. Die schärfsten Gegner im 19. Jahrhundert waren in Deutschland die Jesuiten, besonders die Patres Pachtler, Gruber, Bresciani und Schneemann.

Mit dem Aufhören des Protektorats durch die Hohenzollern wurde auch in Deutschland das Angriffsfeld gegen das Freimaurertum frei. Den Kampf eröffnete der österreichische Nationalrat Dr. Friedrich Wichtl mit seinem Buch „Weltfreimaurerei, Weltrevolution, Weltrepublik“ (1919). Er suchte den Nachweis zu erbringen, daß die Freimaurerei mit allen revolutionären Bewegungen, mit allen politischen Morden verknüpft sei, daß sie vor allem die Schuld im Ersten Weltkrieg trage am Rückzug an der Marne, vor dem verspäteten Einsatz der deutschen Flotte, an der Zermürbung der deutschen Front und an der politischen Umwälzung (→ Novemberrevolte). Sie stehe völlig unter jüdischem Einfluß und erstrebe die jüdische Weltherrschaft. Sie sei international gebunden, unterstehe unbekannten Obern, denen gegenüber die Mitglieder durch fürchterliche Eide zu unbedingtem Gehorsam verpflichtet seien. Als Begründung führte Wichtl die Mitgliedschaft zahlreicher führender Staatsmänner der Weltkriegs- und Nachkriegszeit an. Zur Verteidigung bestritt die deutsche Freimaurerei u. a. die Mitgliedschaft der von Wichtl genannten Staatsmänner und den Zusammenhang der deutschen Logen mit Organisationen wie dem „Freimaurerbund zur aufgehenden Sonne“, den „Oddfellows“, dem jüdischen „B’nai B’rith“, der „Allgemeinen Freimaurerliga“, dem „Alten und Angenommenen Schottischen Ritus“ und überhaupt mit der ausländischen und vorzüglich der romanischen Maurerei.

Einen großangelegten Kampf gegen die Freimaurerei führten General Erich Ludendorff und seine Frau Mathilde Ludendorff und der von ihnen gegründete Tannenberg-Bund; sie sahen in ihr eine den deutsch-völkischen Zielen feindliche „überstaatliche Macht“. Was die den Freimaurern kritische Literatur in der Weimarer Republik bewirkt hat, kann bestens an der Mitgliederentwicklung der ältesten 1772 gegründeten Lübecker Freimaurer-Loge (Johannis-Loge Füllhorn zu Lübeck) abgelesen werden, die im Zenit 1924 „stolze“ 455 Brüder zählte, von denen im Februar 1933 noch 110 Mitglieder übrig waren, wobei es der Hervorhebung bedarf, daß ein Druck der nationalsozialistischen Staatsführung zur Selbstauflösung der Logen erst im Sommer 1935 ausgeübt wurde.

Im Jahre 1937 fand in der Schweiz eine Volksabstimmung über eine Verfassungsinitiative statt, die ein Verbot der Freimaurerei und anderer Geheimgesellschaften vorsah. Dieses Referendum hatte zwar keinen Erfolg, aber immerhin votierte etwa ein Drittel der Wähler für ein solches Verbot.

Alfred Rosenberg faßte in seiner Schrift „Freimaurerische Weltpolitik im Lichte der kritischen Forschung“ (1929) die Gründe der Gegnerschaft des Nationalsozialismus gegen die Freimaurerei zusammen:

  1. Die romanisch-angelsächsischen Logen haben eine gegen das Deutsche Reich gerichtete Politik neben der allgemeinen Staatspolitik geführt. Oft fiel beides zusammen.
  2. An der Spitze aller deutschfeindlichen Kräfte ging und geht der Großorient von Frankreich, gefolgt namentlich von der serbischen Freimaurerei.
  3. Die liberal-plutokratische Logenpolitik befindet sich in stärkster Abhängigkeit von der jüdischen Finanz.
  4. Die deutsche Gesamtmaurerei hat die fremden Freimaurer verteidigt und sich mitschuldig gemacht an der Einschläferung des deutschen Volkes. Der linke Flügel befindet sich in unmittelbarer Abhängigkeit von der französisch-jüdischen Maurerei. Daß stellenweise glatter Landesverrat vorliegt, erscheint als erwiesen.
  5. Der „nationale“ und „christliche“ Flügel hat weder Ritual noch Weltanschauung aufgegeben. Sein „Nationalismus“ ist bloß erzwungene zeitliche Sicherheitsfärbung.
  6. Weil niemand den einzelnen Maurer zu werten vermag, so hat jeder deutsche Freimaurer die Folgen dieser Verurteilung des Ganzen auf sich zu nehmen. Deshalb darf kein Maurer der NSDAP angehören und umgekehrt.

Das oberste Parteigericht entschied im Jahr 1934, daß „kein Freimaurer und niemand, der jemals einer Freimaurerloge angehört hat, Mitglied der Partei werden kann und, falls er doch Aufnahme findet, niemals ein Parteiamt verwalten kann.“


Das jahrzehntelange Leben in Symbolen und in dem freimaurerischen Brauchtum bewirkt, dem Autor Detlef Winter zufolge, eine chronische Schädigung der Denk- und Urteilskraft. Der Freimaurer ist dann nicht mehr in der Lage, dem Reichtum der Gedanken natürlichen und freien Lauf zu lassen, namentlich über alle die Freimaurerei betreffenden Fragen sachlich und logisch nachzudenken. Das ist gleichsam das Ergebnis einer intensiven Gehirn- und Charakterwäsche. Absoluter Gehorsam nämlich, hierarchische verborgene Strukturen, strikte Geheimhaltung und andere widernatürliche Einengungen der autonomen menschlichen Natur bewirken zweifelsfrei Deformationen des Charakters. Hinzu kommt das (fälschliche) Bewußtsein, einer „Elite“ anzugehören, obwohl alle Kennzeichen des Logenlebens doch den Eindruck des Gegenteils vermitteln sollten, nämlich einer unsichtbaren Elite zu dienen. Elitedenken mit rabitater Geheimhaltung zu verknüpfen, erzeuge eigentliche Hybris.[6]


Eine Freimaurerei

Die Freimaurerei muß unterschieden werden zwischen freimaurerischer Idee, freimaurerischen Systemen und freimaurerischer Mimikry.

  • Die Freimaurerische Idee trägt den richtungsgebenden Gedanken des Weltfreimaurertums. So ist der Kosmopolitismus das spezifisch Freimaurerische.
  • Die freimaurerischen Systeme bestehen aus verschiedenen Lehrarten bzw. Unterrichtsmethoden, nach denen man Menschen in die freimaurerische Theologie einführt und sie zu Freimaurern erzieht.
  • Die freimaurerische Mimiky ist das vielseitige Anpassungsvermögen der Logen an den gemeinen Volkscharakter, an die Umgebung, ist die äußerste Formulierung der Freimaurer aus dem „Gesetz der Landschaft“. Man sucht ganz allmählich das Denken derselben durch sorgfältig unter mehr oder weniger kräftige patriotische Floskeln verstreute kosmopolitische Ideen in weltrepublikanische Gebärden zu lenken.

Zudem wird oft behauptet, einige Freimaurerlogen würden unabhängig arbeiten und seien isoliert. In Wirklichkeit gibt es nur „eine“ Freimaurerei. Der Hochgradmaurer August Horneffer schrieb in „Der Bund der Freimaurer“ auf Seite 2:

„Wer in den Freimaurerbund eintritt, muß ein Gelübde ablegen, muß sich einer feierlichen Einweihung unterziehen, muß nicht unbedeutende Opfer darbringen und sieht sich nach Vollzug dieser Bedingungen innerhalb eines geistigen Familien- und Verwandtschaftskreises. Alle Freimaurer auf dem Erdenrund nennen ihn Bruder!“

Die „Leipziger Freimaurerzeitung“ vom 28. Juni 1873 berichtete:

„Für uns Maurerbrüder ist die Loge nicht bloß der eng begrenzte Raum von vier Wänden; das Universum ist die Loge.“

Großmeister Quartier la Tente von der Großloge „Alpina“ in der Schweiz, Mitglied des „Vereines deutscher Freimaurer“, Leipzig, sagte im Juni 1901 auf dem Freimaurerkongreß in Genf:

„Wir haben den Gegnern des freimaurerischen Lichtes klarzumachen, daß alle Logen solidarisch sind und die Freimaurerei eine Einheit bildet.“

Vollkommen isolierte Freimaurerlogen gibt es nicht. Jede Einzelloge (auch sogenannte „Winkellogen“) und jeder engere Logenbund (Großloge) tritt von selbst

  1. in den Nationallogenverband,
  2. in den Gesamtlogenverband der ganzen Erde (Universal-Großloge) ein, welcher seinen lebendigen Ausdruck durch die zu erstrebenden allgemeinen (internationalen) Maurerkongresse und auf denselben zu wählenden obersten Beamtenkollegien erhalten soll.“

Ebendort, Seite 7:

„… In derselben Weise steht die National-Großloge unter den Gesetzen der Universal-Großloge …“

Die Logen tarnen vor der Öffentlichkeit und vor den niederen Graden diese Weltverbundenheit sorgfältig, oder vernebeln den wahren Sinn der Worte und Ziele durch „Phrasen und Menschlichkeit“.


Die Freimaurerei gliedert sich grundsätzlich in drei Grade, die als blaue Johannisfreimaurerei bezeichnet wird. Diese drei Grade heißen Lehrling, Geselle und Meister. Sie stellen keine Hierarchie dar, sondern beschreiben den Weg der persönlichen Weiterentwicklung.

Im Lehrlingsgrad, der Stufe der Selbsterkenntnis, soll der Lehrling seine eigene menschliche Unvollkommenheit erkennen, die durch den rauhen Stein symbolisiert wird. Eigene Fehler sollen erkannt und beseitigt werden können. Mit dieser Fähigkeit wird er in den Gesellengrad befördert, dessen Symbol der kubische Stein ist. Der Geselle soll sich in Selbstbeherrschung üben können, eine Voraussetzung, damit die behauenen und winkelgerechten Steine wirklich zu einem gemeinsamen Tempelbau der Humanität zusammenpassen. Der Meister-Grad, die Stufe der Selbstveredelung, hat als Symbol das Reißbrett. Der Meister soll sich der Vergänglichkeit des menschlichen Lebens bewußt werden und durch das Vorbild seiner Zeichnung mithelfen, daß der Tempelbau zur Vollendung geführt werden kann.

Zusätzlich gibt es verschiedene sogenannte Hochgradsysteme. Da deren Arbeitsfarbe rot ist, werden sie auch manchmal als rote Grade bzw. Andreas-Logen bezeichnet. Sie führen angeblich nicht darüber hinaus, sondern vertiefen nur die Lehren des Lehrlings-, Gesellen- und Meistergrades, daher bezeichnet man diese auch als Erkenntnis- oder Vervollkommnungsstufen.

Berühmte Freimaurer

 Hauptartikel: Prominente Freimaurer


Adolf Hitler (1943)

  • „Zur Stärkung seiner politischen Stellung versucht er [der Jude], die rassischen und staatsbürgerlichen Schranken einzureißen, die ihn zunächst noch auf Schritt und Tritt beengen. Er kämpft zu diesem Zwecke mit aller ihm eigenen Zähigkeit für die religiöse Toleranz – und hat in der ihm vollständig verfallenen Freimaurerei ein vorzügliches Instrument zur Verfechtung wie aber auch zur Durchschiebung seiner Ziele. Die Kreise der Regierenden sowie die höheren Schichten des politischen und wirtschaftlichen Bürgertums gelangen durch maurerische Fäden in seine Schlingen, ohne daß sie es auch nur zu ahnen brauchen.
  • The meaning of NaZi = National Zionist

Alfred Rosenberg (1939)

  • „Hierher gehört das kirchlich-christliche Mitleid, das auch in der freimaurerischen ‚Humanität‘ in neuer Form aufgetaucht ist und zu der größten Verheerung unseres gesamten Lebens geführt hat. Aus dem Zwangsglaubenssatz der schrankenlosen Liebe und der Gleichheit alles Menschlichen vor Gott einerseits, der Lehre vom demokratischen rasselosen und von keinem nationalverwurzelten Ehrgedanken getragenen ‚Menschenrecht‘ andererseits, hat sich die europäische Gesellschaft geradezu als Hüterin des Minderwertigen, Kranken, Verkrüppelten, Verbrecherischen und Verfaulten ‚entwickelt‘.“[8]
  • „Die neue Lehre der Humanität war die ‚Religion‘ der Freimaurer. Diese hat bis auf heute die geistigen Grundlagen einer universaIistisch-abstrakten Bildung abgegeben, den Ausgangspunkt aller ichsüchtigen Glückseligkeitspredigten, sie hat (bereits um 1740) auch das politische Schlagwort der letzten 150 Jahre ‚Freiheit, Gleichheit, Brüderlichkeit‘ geprägt und die chaotische, völkerzersetzende ‚humane‘ Demokratie geboren.“[9]

Kristjan Rakowskij (1938)

  • „Berücksichtigen Sie, daß zu jener Zeit die Regierenden aller alliierten Nationen mit ganz wenigen Ausnahmen Freimaurer waren.“[10]

Personal-Amt des Heers (1944)

  • „Die Vertretung der Hochgrad-Logen ist in jedem Lande ‚der oberste Rat‘. Diese Vertretungen der Hochgrad-Logen aller Länder sind wiederum zentral von einer Stelle aus geleitet, die in jüdischen Händen liegt. Der rein jüdische Bnai Brith-Orden ist aufs engste mit der obersten Geheimzentrale verbunden.“[11]
  • „Das Brauchtum (Ritual) der Freimaurerei wurde unter dem Einfluß des Judentums stets weiter ausgestaltet und ist heute fast rein jüdisch. Die Freimaurerei baut in ihren kultischen Handlungen am zukünftigen Welttempel Salomos, nennt sogar ihren Großmeister ‚Stellvertreter Salomos‘ und hat fast alles, was mit dem biblischen Tempel Salomos zusammenhängt, als Symbol übernommen. Paßworte, Erkennungszeichen, Bildzeichen und das Hauptstück des Rituals, die Hiramslegende, entstammen restlos dem Judentum. So kann man die Freimaurerei eine völlig jüdische Einrichtung nennen.“[11]
  • „Die Verlogenheit des Judentums und der Freimaurerei kann sich in nichts besser zeigen als in der Tatsache, daß nach unten in den Johannis-Logen das demokratische Prinzip gepredigt und auch durchgeführt wird, während im Supreme Consil, dem obersten Rat, das autoritäre Prinzip, also das Führungsprinzip, gilt, weil die Spitzen der Freimaurer ganz genau wissen, daß die demokratischen Prinzipien unweigerlich zum Verfall führen. Eine verlogenere und gefährlichere Organisation hat die Weltgeschichte jedenfalls noch nicht kennengelernt.“[12]

Houston Stewart Chamberlain

  • „Der Freimaurer ist ein künstlicher Jude.“[13]


Als Dank für die jahrhundertelange Mitarbeit am Bau des Tempel Salomo, d. h. an der Zerstörung der arischen Völker und Errichtung der jüdischen Weltherrschaft, wird die Freimaurerei alsbald nach der äußeren Machtübernahme vom Judentum vernichtet. Siehe hierzu:

Rakowskij: „Die Freimaurer haben jene erste deutliche Lektion nicht begriffen, nämlich die Große Revolution, in der sie eine bedeutsame revolutionäre Rolle gespielt haben und die die meisten Freimaurer verschlang, voran ihren Großmeister, den Herzog von Orleans, besser gesagt, den König, der auch Freimaurer war, und danach Girondisten, Hebertisten, Jakobiner … und wenn einige überlebten, so geschah es dank Napoleon Bonaparte und seinem Putsch im Brumaire.
Kuzmin: „Wollen Sie damit sagen, daß die Freimaurer bestimmt sind, durch die Hände der Revolution zu sterben, die von Ihnen selber herbeigeführt wird?
Rakowskij: „Ganz richtig … Sie haben eine tief geheim gehaltene Wahrheit formuliert. Ich bin Freimaurer, Sie werden es gewußt haben, nein? Also gut. Ich werde Ihnen also das große Geheimnis sagen, das man immer dem Freimaurer zu enthüllen verspricht – aber das man ihm weder im 25ten, noch im 33ten, noch im 93ten, noch im höchsten Grade irgend eines der Riten enthüllt. Ich kenne es, selbstverständlich nicht weil ich Freimaurer bin, sondern weil ich zu „Jenen“ gehöre. Die ganze Bildung des Freimaurers und das öffentliche Ziel der Freimaurerei geht dahin, alle notwendigen Voraussetzungen für die kommunistische Revolution zu schaffen und zur Verfügung zu stellen, natürlich unter verschiedenen Vorwänden, die sie unter ihrem bekannten Dreispruch verbergen. Und da die kommunistische Revolution die Liquidation der ganzen Bourgeoisie als Klasse und die physische Liquidation jedes politischen Führers der Bourgeoisie voraussetzt, ist das wirkliche Geheimnis der Freimaurerei der Selbstmord der Freimaurerei als Organisation und der physische Selbstmord jedes irgendwie bedeutenden Freimaurers. Nun verstehen Sie schon, warum, wenn dem Freimaurer ein solches Ende vorbehalten ist, man Mysterien, Theaterszenen und soundsoviel „Geheimnisse“ benötigt – um das wirkliche Geheimnis zu verbergen. Lassen Sie sich, wenn Sie dazu Gelegenheit haben, nicht entgehen, sich in irgendeiner zukünftigen Revolution die Geste von Erschrecken und Blödheit zu betrachten, die auf dem Gesicht eines Freimaurers erscheint, wenn er kapiert, daß er von den Händen der Revolutionäre sterben soll. Wie er kreischt und sich auf seine Verdienste um die Revolution berufen will! Das wird ein Schauspiel, um auch zu sterben – aber vor Lachen!
Zu diesem Zwecke werden wir alle hinrichten lassen, die unseren Regierungsantritt mit der Waffe in der Hand begrüßen. Jede Neugründung irgend einer geheimen Gesellschaft wird ebenfalls mit dem Tode bestraft werden. Die jetzt bestehenden und bekannten Geheimgesellschaften, die uns gute Dienste geleistet haben und noch leisten, werden wir auflösen. Ihre Mitglieder werden in fern von Europa gelegene Erdteile verschickt werden. Auf diese Art werden wir mit den Nichtjuden, die freimaurerischen Logen angehören und davon zuviel wissen, verfahren. Diejenigen, welche wir aus irgendeinem Grunde verschonen werden, werden sich unter dem ständigen Druck, ausgewiesen zu werden, befinden.

Siehe auch



  • Encyclopedia de la Masoneria, selbstdarstellendes Freimaurer-Wiki in fünf Sprachen. Dort erklärt die Redaktion: „Die Akademie betrachtet sich selbst als einen Ort freimaurerischer Ökumene und hat sich darüber hinaus zu einer Plattform entwickelt, auf der sich Vertreter aller freimaurerischer Systeme über alle von Anerkennungsfragen gezogenen Grenzen hinweg zusammenfinden, um das allen Freimaurern gemeinsame, die Schaffung einer humanen, toleranten und brüderlichen Gesellschaft zu fördern. Zu den Mitgliedern der Akademie zählen persönliche und korporative Mitglieder aus allen freimaurerischen Systemen. Damit entspricht diese Bildungseinrichtung hervorragend dem Impetus des Freimaurer-Wikis.“



  • Horst E. Miers: Lexikon des Geheimwissens. Wilhelm Goldmann Verlag, München 1993, ISBN 3-442-12179-5, S. 223–227
  • Caroline Klima: Das Große Handbuch der Geheimgesellschaften. Freumaurer, Illuminaten und andere Bünde. Bei tosa im Verlag Carl Ueberreuter, Wien 2007, ISBN 978-3-85003-096-0, S. 164–212
  • Gerald Willms: Die wunderbare Welt der Sekten. Von Paulus bis Scientology.Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 2012, ISBN 978-3-525-56013-6 [6. Kapitel: Die esoterische Ordensszene und das moderne Logentum, S. 140–157]

Artikel in Periodika






  1. Hochspringen  Deutschlandradio Kultur, 27. April 2011: „L’Express“: Zahl der Freimaurer in Frankreich seit 70ern stark gestiegen
  2. Hochspringen  Walther Rathenau: Der Kaiser. S. Fischer Verlag, Berlin 1919, S. 54 ff.
  3. Hochspringen  Vgl.: Die geheime Macht hinter den Zeugen Jehovas von Robin de Ruiter, Durach 1995, S. 62–64
  4. Hochspringen  vgl.: Friedrich Wichtl: Dr. Karl Kramarsch. Der wahre Anstifter des Weltkrieges(PDF-Datei)
  5. Hochspringen  Video der Rede (undatiert). Zitat: „Now I know there are some people who say that this isn’t any business of the President of the United States […] and who believe that the President of the United States should be the honorary chairman of a great fraternal organization and confine himself to ceremonial functions, but that isn’t what the Constitution says, and I did not run for President of the United States to fulfill that office in that way.“
  6. Hochspringen  Detlef Winter: Aphorismen, Zitate und Bibliographie zur Freimaurer-Kritik, S. 14
  7. Hochspringen  Adolf Hitler: Mein Kampf. 1943, Seite 345
  8. Hochspringen  Alfred Rosenberg: Der Mythus des 20. Jahrhunderts. 1939, Seite 169
  9. Hochspringen  Alfred Rosenberg: Der Mythus des 20. Jahrhunderts. 1939, S. 200 f.
  10. Hochspringen  Josef Landowsky: Rakowskij-Protokoll. Nachdruck Faksimile Verlag, Bremen 1987, S. 41
  11.  Hochspringen nach: 11,0 11,1 96-book.png Personalamt des Heeres (Hg.): Wofür kämpfen wir?, 1944, S. 15
  12. Hochspringen  Personal-Amt des Heers: Wofür kämpfen wir. 1944, S. 17
  13. Hochspringen  Michael Angele: Der Feind ist maskiert und lauert überall, FAZ, 3. August 2000, S. 4 Vorsicht! Umerziehungsliteratur im antideutschen Sinne!
  14. Hochspringen  Josef Landowsky: Rakowskij-Protokoll, Editorial NOS, Madrid, 1950. Deutsche Übersetzung: Dürer Verlag, Buenos Aires, 1987, S. 41–42
  15. Hochspringen  Ulrich Fleischhauer: Gerichts-Gutachten zum Berner Prozeß – Die echten Protokolle der Weisen von Zion, U. Bodung-Verlag, Erfurt, 1935, S. 333
  16. Hochspringen  Forces occultes, BitChute, mit englischen Untertiteln und englischer Vertonung, 8. April 2019

Symptoms Resulting From Chemtrail Spraying

10 January 2011

Over the past ten years, through research and the personal accounts of many individuals, it has become readily apparent that the aluminum and barium salt mixtures, polymer fibers, toxic chemicals and biologicals sprayed in the atmosphere are the irritants that are either directly or indirectly responsible for health problems on the rise in the United States and elsewhere.

These toxic particulates are rapidly absorbed from the respiratory system and / or the gastrointestinal tract and are deposited in the lungs, muscles, and bone.
This illegal aerial spraying is producing atmospheric and ground conditions detrimental to human and animal health but favorable to the growth of harmful molds / fungus.
This overview is a partial list of health problems reported by private citizens to Chemtrail researchers.
1. Nose and lung bleeds (the latter including several reports from nursing homes of elderly dying from lung bleed outs, we believe being directly attributable to atmospheric aerosols);
2. Asthma and allergies;
3. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) (fungus on the lungs in both infants and adults),
4. Flu, Bronchitis and Pneumonia (in epidemic proportions, with doctors commenting to their patients on the many weeks it sometimes takes to improve and the lack of effective antibiotics to treat, including reports of pets having the flu, whole families being decimated), meningitis (inflammation / infection of the brain);
5. Upper respiratory symptoms (wheezing, dry cough), including Pulmonary Distress Syndrome (PDS) (in newborns, infants and adults alike), Sudden Infant Death (SIDS), and increased nationwide reports of the sudden death of athletes (reported in the news media as having possibly been attributable directly to air particulates / pollution);
6. Deaths from black mold; black or red mold on food crops (farmers reporting pH changes of soil and water), in buildings and ventilation systems (including school buildings);
7. Arthritis-like symptoms and muscular pain (young and old alike, sometimes crippling, and in pets);
8. Gastrointestinal distress (young and old alike, and in pets);
9. Bladder and yeast infections (includes bed wetting, not just in infants but adults);
10. Extreme fatigue (young and old alike);
11. Ringing of the ears, dizziness (increasingly reported immediately preceding or after a storm or weather system);
12. Eye problems – pink eye, blurred and deteriorating vision / nervous tics after exposure to the air outdoors;
13. Dry / cracking skin and lips, rashes, sores and fungal infections, aging of the skin;
14. Mental confusion / slow thinking and / or the feeling of mentally “being in a fog” (young and old alike, increasingly reported after actually being in heavy mists and fog banks);
15. Autoimmune disorders (Lupus, Crohn’s, Addison’s Disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis, etc.)
Note: Some of the above symptoms / illnesses can be related to other physical / environmental factors such as dehydration.)
Aluminum Symptoms
Excessive amounts of aluminum can result in symptoms of poisoning. The symptoms include constipation, colic, loss of appetite, nausea, skin ailments, twitching of leg muscles, excessive perspiration, and loss of energy. People with aluminum poisoning should discontinue the use of aluminum cookware and the drinking of tap water. Small quantities of soluble salts of aluminum present in the blood causes slow form of poisoning characterized by motor paralysis and areas of local numbness, with fatty degeneration of kidney and liver. There are also anatomical changes in the nerve centres and symptoms of gastro intestinal inflammation.
In the last few years there has been much publicity about aluminum, as well as a tentative connection of aluminum to Alzheimer Disease. According to Dr. Terry L. Franks the clinical picture is clear that Alzheimer’s is concurrently involved with aluminum toxicity and he also believe it is the major contributing factor to Alzheimer’s. It will progressively worsen in North America in the coming year because of the pervasive use of aluminum. Aluminum has the tendency to freeze up or irritate nerve endings, producing spasm and contracture. When someone is going through aluminum detoxification can actually look like an advanced case of Alzheimers Disease.
How Aluminum Affects Health
Nervous system
In animal studies, aluminum blocks the action potential or electrical discharge of nerve cells, reducing nervous system activity. Aluminum also inhibits important enzymes in the brain (Na-K-ATPase and hexokinase). Aluminum may also inhibit uptake of important chemicals by nerve cells (dopamine, norepinephrine, and 5-hydroxytryptamine).
Behavioural Effects
Dementia resulting from kidney dialysis related to aluminum toxicity causes memory loss, loss of coordination, confusion and disorientation.
Symptoms of Aluminum Toxicity
Early symptoms of aluminum toxicity include: flatulence, headaches, colic, dryness of skin and mucous membranes, tendency for colds, burning pain in the head relieved by food, heartburn and an aversion to meat.
Later symptoms include paralytic muscular conditions, loss of memory and mental confusion. Other symtpoms may include:
Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, anaemia, haemolysis, leukocytosis, porphyra, colitis, dental cavities, dementia dialactica, hypo-parathyroidism, kidney dysfunction, neuromuscular disorder, osteomalacia, Parkinson’s disease, ulcers.
Digestive system
Aluminum reduces intestinal activity, and by doing so can cause colic.
Treatment of Aluminum Toxicity
Decreasing contact with and use of aluminum-containing substances will reduce intake and allow more aluminum to leave the body. Oral chelating agents will also help clear aluminum more rapidly. Calcium disodium edetate (EDTA) binds and clears aluminum from the body; this substance is fairly nontoxic and used as the agent for “chelation therapy,: an intravenous treatment used to pull metals such as lead from the body, and more recently used in the treatment of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases.
Deferoxamine, an iron chelator, also binds aluminum. In a study with Alzheimer’s patients, nearly 40 percent of the patients showed an improvement in symptoms with deferoxamine treatment. There is some evidence that intravenous chelation with EDTA helps Alzheimer’s patients. More research is needed to evaluate aluminum’s involvement with this disease. Recovery is excellent for removing heavy metals.
Vitamin C
Has been found to bind aluminum. The average dose, if the patient is relatively comfortable, is about six grams a day. Up to twelve grams is not excessive. The average time on an aluminum detoxification is three to four weeks.
The best way to prevent aluminum buildup is to avoid the sources of aluminum. Eliminating foods that have aluminum additives is probably healthier overall. Not using common table salt is a positive health step as well. Some tap waters contain aluminum, this can be checked. Avoiding aluminum cookware and replacing it with stainless steel, ceramic, or glass is a good idea. Blocking skin and sweat pores with aluminum anti-perspirants.
The possibility of barium poisoning is a reality among people working in and living near heavy industrial sites such as chemical plants, factories that produce rubber products and other such places. That is because barium is one of the components used in manufacturing the products created in these plants.
However, because many of these products end up in ordinary households, it is also possible for a person who does not work in or live near an industrial plant to experience barium poisoning. Rat poison, for instance, contains barium compounds. Some fluorescent bulbs have coatings made from barium oxide. Fish caught in waters near industrial sites may have absorbed barium from the water.
Given the considerable probability of a person becoming afflicted with barium poisoning, how would you know for sure if you or someone living with you ingested barium at toxic levels? If you find yourself or someone living in your household with symptoms of barium poisoning, then you should act immediately.
What Is Barium?
In order to understand how serious barium poisoning is, we need first to understand what barium is in the first place. Barium is a heavy metal that naturally occurs in the environment. It is silvery white in appearance.
Barium is valuable in many industries that make use of heavy metal because it can remove traces of oxygen in some chemical compounds. It also increases the luster of glass. However, barium is explosive and can react violently when mixed with water. Also, it cannot be digested by the body; barium can be poisonous if the amount the body contains exceeds tolerable levels.
Symptoms of Barium Poisoning to Look For
When barium accumulates in the body, it usually affects the functions of the nervous system. Barium poisoning displays symptoms that are similar to flu, which is why it is not strange to find the condition misdiagnosed as flu. Common symptoms of barium poisoning include:
1. Muscle weakness and tremors
2. Difficulty in breathing
3. Stomach irritations accompanied by diarrhea
4. Anxiety
5. Cardiac irregularities such as abnormally high blood pressure and rapid heartbeat
6. Paralysis
What to Do in Case of Barium Poisoning
In case someone in your household has just ingested something that contains barium, the first thing you need to do is to induce him or her to vomit. This will get some of the barium out of the victim’s system. You can also mix a tablespoon of Epsom salts (sodium sulfate or magnesium sulfate) with a glass of water and get the victim to drink it. Afterwards, you should bring the victim to the emergency room of the nearest hospital to make sure that he or she does not succumb to barium poisoning.
You can also prevent barium poisoning from happening in your home. For one, you should keep your rat poison or any other chemical substances in your house that contains barium out of reach of children. Make sure that you have labeled their containers properly.
You should also avoid eating fish that was caught near industrial sites and ascertain that the fish and seafood you eat does not contain barium or any other heavy metal. This will prevent you from accumulating barium in your system and suffer from barium poisoning later on.
Source: OkanaganChemtrails.blog.ca, Chemtrails – Health Effects on the General Population by Claude-Michel Prévost

2nd Source

Anonymous WARNUNG !

Hallo Welt.

Dies ist eine Warnung von Anonymous.

Wir beobachten die momentane Entwicklung in der Gesellschaft mit wachsender Besorgnis.

Es gibt eine neue Gefahr die uns alle bedroht, und die noch zu wenigen bewusst ist.

Es ist der Meinungsfaschismus.

Vor allem bei der politisch motivierten Jugend und bei Studenten sehen wir momentan, dass Menschen die andere Ansichten haben, ausgegrenzt und vorverurteilt, ja sogar bekämpft werden.

Dieses Verhalten kennt man eher von Nazis und Faschisten; doch jetzt ist es in der Mitte der Gesellschaft und vor allem bei der Jugend angekommen. Es scheint jetzt leider zum gutem Ton zu gehören ein Meinungsfaschist zu sein.

Wie äußert sich Meinungsfaschismus? Das Prinzip dahinter ist simpel.

Man vertritt selber eine beliebige Meinung, diese muss nicht einmal fundiert sein, es reicht aus, genug Freunde und Bekannte zu haben die diese Meinung teilen.

Dann wendet man die ganze Energie dafür auf, andere, von der eigenen Meinung abweichende Ansichten, zu unterdrücken und im Keim zu ersticken.

Es werden dazu alle beliebigen Mittel verwendet. Von Ausgrenzung, Niederschreien und Mobbing bis hin zu tätlichen Angriffen.

Der Grundgedanke dahinter ist der, dass Meinungen nicht nur private Ansichten sind die einem jeden zustehen, sondern ein Verbrechen an der eigenen Gesinnung darstellen.

Wir kennen das berühmte Sprichwort: „Faschismus ist keine Meinung sondern ein Verbrechen.“

Jetzt können wir aber mittlerweile immer mehr Platzhalterwörter dafür einsetzen.

Klimawandelkritik ist keine Meinung sondern ein Verbrechen.

Genderkritik ist keine Meinung sondern ein Verbrechen.

Fleischessen ist keine Ernährungsform sondern ein Verbrechen.

Diese Auflistung ließe sich noch unendlich lange fortführen.

Was ist das gefährliche daran?

Nun, es handelt sich hierbei um ein faschistoides Verhaltensmuster.

Wo herkömmlicher Faschismus nur Menschen mit gewissen Merkmalen oder Herkünften ausgrenzt, so grenzt Meinungsfaschismus jeden Menschen aus, der anders denkt als man selber.

Dies kann auch innerhalb der Familie geschehen wie wir gerade deutlich an der Fridays for Future und an der Extinction Rebellion–Jugend sehen können.

In George Orwells Dystopie 1984 gab es den Terminus Gedankenverbrechen, und genau das ist es was wir hier gerade erleben.

Orwells Buch war keine Warnung sondern eine Anleitung.

Wer nicht so denkt wie man denken soll, wird a priori als minderwertig, dumm oder böse eingestuft.

Dies mutet fast an wie ein Glaubenskrieg. Es geht gar nicht mehr um Fakten und Beweise, sondern es geht darum Recht zu haben, und wer am lautesten brüllt der fühlt sich im Recht.

Die leersten Köpfe machen nun mal den meisten Lärm.

Wir möchten Euch ein aktuelles Beispiel geben, wie man Meinungsfaschismus erkennt, und zwar am Thema des angeblich menschengemachten Klimawandels.

Der Menschengemachte Klimawandel wird von den Leitmedien, vielen Prominenten und vor allem der Jugend als bewiesen propagiert, und der Konsens ist der, dass wir in 50 Jahren alle aussterben, oder sich unsere Lebensbedingen zumindest dramatisch verschlechtern werden.

Ginge es nach Al Gore, wären wir heute alle schon tot. Nur erinnern sich die Meisten nicht, was dieser Priester der Klimakirche predigte.

Jede andere Meinung, ist sie auch noch so differenziert und belegbar wird:

„in den jeweiligen Foren und Diskussionsgruppen sofort zensiert, gelöscht und führt zu einem Auschluss aus der Gruppe.

Führt dazu, dass man öffentlich diskreditiert und mundtot gemacht wird.

Führt dazu, dass man auf der Strasse beschimpft wird.

Führt dazu, dass man auf Demonstrationen bedroht und angegriffen wird.

Führt dazu, dass man als Nazi oder anderes beschimpft wird.

Letztendlich führt es dazu, dass man Angst hat seine Meinung frei zu äußern.“

Ja, da wären wir dann.

Willkommen im Faschismus 2.0

Anonymous ruft alle Menschen dazu auf, zu dieser gefährlichen Entwicklung nicht länger zu schweigen.

Faschismus setzt sich nur durch, wenn der Großteil der Menschen aus Angst vor Konsequenzen schweigt.

Jetzt können wir diese Entwicklung noch stoppen, aber wir müssen JETZT handeln, sonst könnte es zu spät sein.

Anonymous war schon immer ein Verteidiger der Meinungs- und Redefreiheit.

Dies ist einer der Grundpfeiler unserer Gesellschaft und ein Recht eines jeden freien Menschen.

Benennt Meinungsfaschismus als das was er ist.

Weist die jungen Menschen, die in diese Falle tappen, darauf hin.

Brecht das Schweigen, und stoppt mit uns diese Entwicklung.

Wir von Anonymous werden Euch dabei unterstützen und wir beobachten die Meinungsfaschisten ganz genau.

Ihr seid auf unserem Radar.

Passt auf und werdet wieder normal!

Wir schliessen mit einem angeblichen Zitat von Voltaire:

„Mein Herr, ich teile Ihre Meinung nicht, aber ich würde mein Leben dafür einsetzen, daß Sie sie äußern dürfen.“

Wir sind Anonymous.

Wir vergeben nicht.

Wir vergessen nicht.

Erwartet uns!

United States Army war college implications of climate change for the U.S. army

Read as pdf

United States Army War College

Implications of Climate Change

for the U.S. Army

Study Authors (in alphabetical order)

Colonel Max Brosig, U.S. Army National Guard

Colonel Parker Frawley, U.S. Army

Dr. Andrew Hill, U.S. Army War College

Prof. Molly Jahn, University of Wisconsin-Madison, NASA HARVEST Consortium

Colonel Michael Marsicek, U.S. Air Force Dr. Aubrey Paris, Princeton University

Mr. Matthew Rose, U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency and Major, U.S. Army Reserve

Colonel Amar Shambaljamts, Mongolian Army Ms. Nicole Thomas, U.S. Army

Executive Summary

Implications of Climate Change for the U.S. Army

Current conversations about climate change and its im- pacts are often rancorous and politically charged. As an organization that is, by law, non-partisan, the Depart- ment of Defense (DoD) is precariously unprepared for the national security implications of climate change-in- duced global security challenges. This study examines the implications of climate change for the United States Army. This includes national security challenges asso- ciated with or worsened by climate change, and orga- nizational challenges arising from climate change-re- lated issues in the domestic environment. Given that, the study’s starting point is the implications of climate change for the U.S. Army, and the Army is therefore the focus of the analysis and recommendations. That said, much of the analysis involves DoD and other elements of the government, and most of the Army-specific rec- ommendations have parallels that apply to other military services.

The study itself did not involve original research on the nature or magnitude of climate change. The analysis assumes, based on the preponderance of evidence available, that significant changes in climate have al- ready occurred, likely to worsen in the years ahead. The study did not look to ascribe causation to climate change (man-made or natural), as causation is distinct from effects and not pertinent to the approximately 50- year horizon considered for the study. The study does, however, assume that human behavior can mitigate both the size and consequences of negative impacts that result from climate change.

Summary of Analysis

Initial findings of the study focus on changes to the physical environment and the human response to those changes.

Sea level rise, changes in water and food security, and more frequent extreme weather events are likely to re-

sult in the migration of large segments of the popula- tion. Rising seas will displace tens (if not hundreds) of millions of people, creating massive, enduring insta- bility. This migration will be most pronounced in those regions where climate vulnerability is exacerbated by weak institutions and governance and underdeveloped civil society. Recent history has shown that mass hu- man migrations can result in increased propensity for conflict and turmoil as new populations intermingle with and compete against established populations. More frequent extreme weather events will also increase de- mand for military humanitarian assistance.

Salt water intrusion into coastal areas and changing weather patterns will also compromise or eliminate fresh water supplies in many parts of the world. Additionally, warmer weather increases hydration requirements. This means that in expeditionary warfare, the Army will need to supply itself with more water. This significant logis- tical burden will be exacerbated on a future battlefield that requires constant movement due to the ubiquity of adversarial sensors and their deep strike capabilities.

A warming trend will also increase the range of insects that are vectors of infectious tropical diseases. This, coupled with large scale human migration from tropical nations, will increase the spread of infectious disease. The Army has tremendous logistical capabilities, unique in the world, in working in austere or unsafe environ- ments. In the event of a significant infectious disease outbreak (domestic or international), the Army is likely to be called upon to assist in the response and contain- ment.

Arctic ice will continue to melt in a warming climate. These Arctic changes present both challenges and op- portunities. The decrease in Arctic sea ice and associat- ed sea level rise will bring conflicting claims to newly-ac- cessible natural resources. It will also introduce a new theater of direct military contact between an increasing-


ly belligerent Russia and other Arctic nations, including the U.S. Yet the opening of the Arctic will also increase commercial opportunities. Whether due to increased commercial shipping traffic or expanded opportunities for hydrocarbon extraction, increased economic activity will drive a requirement for increased military expendi- tures specific to that region. In short, competition will increase.

The increased likelihood of more intense and longer du- ration drought in some areas, accompanied by great- er atmospheric heating, will put an increased strain on the aging U.S. power grid and further spur large scale human migration elsewhere. Power generation in U.S. hydroelectric and nuclear facilities will be affected. This dual attack on both supply and demand could create more frequent, widespread and enduring power grid failures, handicapping the U.S. economy.

In addition to the changing environmental conditions that will contribute to a changing security environment, climate change will likely also result in social, political, and market pressures that may profoundly affect the Ar- my’s (and DoD’s) activities. Studies indicate that global society, including in the U.S., increasingly views climate change as a grave threat to security. As the electorate becomes more concerned about climate change, it fol- lows that elected officials will, as well. This may result in significant restrictions on military activities (in peace- time) that produce carbon emissions. In concert with these changes, consumer demands will drive market adaptation. Businesses will focus on more environmen- tally sound products and practices to meet demand.

The DoD does not currently possess an environmental- ly conscious mindset. Political and social pressure will eventually force the military to mitigate its environmental impact in both training and wartime. Implementation of these changes will be costly in effort, time and money. This is likely to occur just as the DoD is adjusting to changes in the security environment previously high- lighted.

Summary of Recommendations

In light of these findings, the military must consider changes in doctrine, organization, equipping, and train- ing to anticipate changing environmental requirements. Greater inter-governmental and inter-organizational co- operation, mandated through formal framework agree- ments, will allow the DoD to anticipate those areas where future conflict is more likely to occur and to implement a campaign-plan-like approach to proactively prepare for likely conflict and mitigate the impacts of mass migra- tion. Focused research and early funding of anticipated future equipment and requirements will spread the cost of adaptation across multiple budget cycles, diminish the “sticker shock” and impacts to overall spending.

Finally, the DoD must begin now to promulgate a culture of environmental stewardship across the force. Lagging behind public and political demands for energy efficien- cy and minimal environmental footprint will significantly hamstring the Department’s efforts to face national se- curity challenges. The Department will struggle to main- tain its positive public image and that will impact the military’s ability to receive the required funding to face the growing number of security challenges.

The recommendations of this study follow.


1.1 Problem: Hydration Challenges in a Contested Environment

Recommendation: The Army must develop ad- vanced technologies to capture ambient hu- midity and transition technology from the United States Army Research, Development, and Engi- neering Command (RDECOM) that supports the water sustainment tenants of decentralizing and embedded, harvest water, and recycle and re- use.

Implementation Timing: 6-10 Years Resource Requirement: Moderate


1.2 Problem: Lack of adequate preparation and co- herence in doctrine, training, and capabilities development to support effective Arctic opera- tions.

Recommendation: The Army and the Depart- ment of Defense must begin planning and im- plementing changes to training, equipment, doctrine and capabilities in anticipation of an ex- panded role in the Arctic associated with global climate adaptation.

Implementation Timing: Now to 10+ Years. Resource Requirements: Moderate to High.


1.1 Problem: The Lack of a Culture of Environmen-

tal Stewardship

Recommendation: Army leadership must create a culture of environmental consciousness, stay ahead of societal demands for environmental stewardship and serve as a leader for the na- tion or it risks endangering the broad support it now enjoys. Cultural change is a senior leader responsibility.

Implementation Timing: Now Resource Requirements: Low

1.2 Problem: Potential disruptions to readiness due to restrictions on fuel use.

Recommendation: The Army must significantly increase investment in more realistic simulation that incorporates the advances in virtual and augmented reality. It should also continue to in- vest in the development of lower CO2 emissions platforms and systems.

Implementation Timing: 6-10 years (Virtual Re- ality / Augmented Reality), 10+ years (alternate energy platforms).

Resource Requirements: Moderate to High. 2. THE JOINT FORCE AND DoD

2.1 Problem: Lack of coordination and consolida- tion in climate-change related intelligence.

Recommendation: Advocate for a comprehen- sive organization, functional manager, technol- ogy, and process review study to identify the current state of intelligence community agencies with regard to climate change, with the goal of formalizing Interagency coordination on Climate Change-related intelligence.

Implementation Timing: Now Resourcing Requirements: Low

2.2 Problem: Lack of Organizational Accountability for and Coordination of Climate Change-Relat- ed Response and Mitigation Activities

Recommendation: Re-commit to the Senior En- ergy and Sustainability Council (SESC). Add a re- sourcing element to the council by providing the USA and VCSA with funding across each POM cycle to support climate-related projects that im- prove readiness and resiliency of the force.

Implementation Timing: Now, 1-10 Years

Resource Requirements: Low, though potential- ly moderate through reprogramming.


2.3 Problem: Lack of Climate Change-Oriented Campaign Planning and Preparation

Recommendation: (A) Develop Bangladesh (worst case scenario) Relief Campaign Plan as notional plan for preparing for broader climate change-related requirements arising from large- scale, permanent population dislocations. (B) Work more closely with the CDC to ensure ap- propriate military support to infectious disease treatment and containment. (C) Ensure pre- paredness for global, regional or local disrup- tions in logistics that may affect the Army’s op- erations or allies.

Implementation Timing: Now Resource Requirement: Low


3.1 Problem: Power Grid Vulnerabilities

Recommendation: A. An inter-agency approach, coupled with collaboration of the commercial sector, should catalogue the liabilities across the electrical grid and prioritize budget requests for infrastructure improvements. B. The DoD should pursue options to reverse infrastructure degra- dation around military installations, including funding internal power generation such as solar/ battery farms and small-nuclear reactors.

Implementation Timing: Now (A); 6-10, 10+ Years (B)

Resource Requirement: Low (A); High (B)

3.2 Problem: Climate Change and Threats to Nucle- ar Weapons Infrastructure

Recommendation: The U.S. Department of De- fense, in combination with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) should develop a long term 15 to 20 year tritium production plan that accounts for advances in nuclear technology and the pos- sibility of rising climate induced water levels as well as increases to the overall average water temperature used to cool nuclear reactors. This plan should include projections of fiscal resourc- es and military tritium requirements needed to maintain and modernize the U.S. nuclear stock- pile. It should also include U.S. government re- quirements for use of helium-3, a decay product of tritium used primarily for neutron detection when searching for special nuclear material (SNM) and enforcing nuclear non-proliferation agreements.

Implementation Timing: Now to 10+ Years

Resource Requirement: High

Finally, the study examined the threat climate change poses to the U.S. military’s coastal infrastructure, i.e., coastal military facilities and key airports and shipping facilities. Additionally, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) manages the nation’s system of inland water- ways, and condition of much of that system will be af- fected by rising seas and changing weather. That said, the study found no basis for additional action. The DoD and USACE have adequate systems and processes in place to track and manage these risks.



Current public discourse about climate change and its impacts are often rancorous and politically charged. As an organization that is, by law, non-partisan, the Depart- ment of Defense (DoD) is precariously unprepared for the national security implications of climate change in- duced global security challenges. This study seeks to determine likely national security challenges associated with or exacerbated by anticipated climate change in an effort to craft recommendations for the DoD. Many of the recommendations are specifically targeted at the Army, however the specific recommendation or its parallel can be applied across the military as a whole. The study of climate change as a threat to U.S. and global security is

not new to the U.S. Army or DoD.

not conduct specific research on the climate or climate change but assumed through the preponderance of ev- idence available that climate change is occurring. Ad- ditionally, the study did not look to ascribe causation to the climate change (man-made or natural) as causation is distinct from effects and not pertinent to the approxi- mately 50 year horizon considered for the study.

In determining likely national security impacts and pro- viding recommendations for the military, the authors relied upon the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Representative Concentration

  1. Werrill, C. and F. Femia. “Chronology of Military and Intelli- gence Concerns about Climate Change.” The Center for Climate & Security. 2017. https://climateandsecurity.org/2017/01/12/ chronology-of-the-u-s-military-and-intelligence-communitys-con- cern-about-climate-change/.
  2. “Report on Effects of a Changing Climate to the Department

of Defense.” United States Department of Defense. 2019. https:// climateandsecurity.files.wordpress.com/2019/01/sec_335_ndaa-re- port_effects_of_a_changing_climate_to_dod.pdf.

  1. Werrill, C. and F. Femia. “New Pentagon Report: “The ef-

fects of a changing climate are a national security issue.” The Center for Climate & Security. 2019. https://climateandsecurity. org/2019/01/18/new-pentagon-report-the-effects-of-a-changing-cli- mate-are-a-national-security-issue/.

Pathway (RCP) 4.5. RCP 4.5 is the middle ground pre- diction of temperature and rainfall variation provided by the IPCC for climate change studies. Use of this model is intended to provide a realistic anticipation of future impacts of climate change without forecasting either extremely dire and catastrophic impacts or minimizing them to such an extent that they are meaningless.

The findings generally are categorized as those relating to anticipated changes in the physical environment and those relating to anticipated changes in the social en- vironment. That is, the authors, using available studies, determined if changes to societal norms would have an impact on the military’s ability to execute anticipated missions. The corresponding recommendations con- sider a near, mid and long term horizon and a low, mid or high level of resources allocated against the chal- lenges. The intent is to provide senior leaders with an easy to understand anticipation of risk associated with each recommendation.

For the purposes of this study the authors chose to use the IPCC definition of climate change. This definition is most compatible as it simply looks at changing climate variables over time without ascribing causation.

Climate Change: Climate change refers to a change in the state of the climate that can be identified (e.g., by using statistical tests) by changes in the mean and/or the variability of its properties and that persists for an extended period, typically decades or longer. Climate change may be due to natural internal processes or ex- ternal forcings such as modulations of the solar cycles, volcanic eruptions and persistent anthropogenic chang- es in the composition of the atmosphere or in land use.4

  1. “Global Warming of 1.5° C.” Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2018. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/.


This study itself did


An aside on Climate Models and Risk: Uncertainty com- plicates choices about how to respond to or anticipate the consequences of climate change. Regardless of the cause, climatological data reflects an environment that is always changing. Where the choices lie hinges on whether or not we choose to act. There are four possi- ble scenarios involving climate change and human ac- tion to mitigate or prepare for it. (See Figure 1, below.) Each approach carries a level of risk informed by the amount and type of action taken.

The matrix in Figure 1 summarizes payoffs from two different choices (mitigate and prepare or not), given two different contexts (climate change occurring or not). Obviously missing from this matrix is a sense of the probability of climate change itself, which would affect payoff calculations. However, for the sake of the present argument let us make the conservative assumption that climate change is a 50/50 proposition (data and theory indicate that climate change is already occurring).

Figure 1: Climate Change Risk / Response Matrix

First, we can assume no climate change is occurring and we can choose to do nothing. If our assumption about climate change is accurate, this is the most ap- pealing option. Second, we can assume there is no change occurring, but that humans choose to act and mitigate human effects to the environment. This option is unappealing in that we will have wasted economic resources, pointlessly regulating and taxing ourselves.

However, if climate change is occurring and we choose to do nothing, we invite catastrophe, though we can- not know just how bad this payoff would be. Finally, if we assume climate change is occurring and undertake mitigation and preparation, we may avoid catastrophe.5

The only justification for doing nothing to mitigate and prepare for climate change is enough certainty that cli- mate change is not occurring to justify the very consid- erable risk of doing nothing. The strength of scientific arguments in favor of significant warming projections suggests that such certainty is not defensible. (See Fig- ure 2, next page.6) Prudent risk management therefore suggests that we should work to avoid the catastrophic outcome and prepare for and mitigate climate change.

Based on this argument, this report accepts as a core assumption the reality of climate change and cli- mate-change related global warming, and therefore focuses on what the Army should do to prepare itself. Regardless of the science behind climatological projec- tions of global warming, climate change is a controver- sial political issue. For the purposes of this study, we ignore that controversy. We must observe that the plan- et is warming with a broad range of impacts relevant to the U.S. Army, and we employ middle-of-the-curve projections to guide our analysis of recommendations.

  1. Davis, Morton D., and Oskar Morgenstern. Game Theory: A Nontechnical Introduction. Mineola (New York): Dover Publications, 2013.
  • “Scientific Consensus: Earth’s Climate is Warming.” NASA Global Climate Change, Vital Signs of the Planet. 2018. https://cli- mate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ – *.

  • 6

    Figure 2: Temperatures Showing the Last Decade was the Warmest on Record

    Part 1: The Challenge of Climate Change

    Challenge 1: Climate Change and the Physical Environment

    Climate change affects the physical environment of the planet. It therefore affects the conditions in which peo- ple live, and the environment in which military organi- zations operate. The effects of a warming climate with more extreme weather are astonishingly far-reaching. Scientific studies in very diverse fields describe effects that have accelerated over the past 50 years as glaciers, Arctic and Antarctic ice sheets retreat, major weather patterns shift, and demographic, economic and politi- cal forces put more people in harm’s way, while creat- ing additional multi-dimensional stress on conventional military forces. The trend toward larger, more coherent and integrated research investments, such as the NASA Harvest Consortium, allows science agencies to estab- lish improved and tight interfaces with the DoD on top- ics relevant to the military that are outside of traditional lanes. This consortium leverages broad international

    cooperation and domestic collaborations using NASA earth observations to improve crop yield forecasting with the specific intent to establish tighter and more functional interfaces between NASA Applied Sciences Division and operational agencies, including DoD. Cli- mate change also increases the risk of unrest and con- flict globally. Human migration and refugee relocation due to chronic drought, flooding, episodes of extreme, unusual weather or other natural events create an envi- ronment ripe for conflict and large-scale humanitarian crises. In 2018, global international migration and inter- nal displacement were estimated at a historic highs by the International Organization for Migration,7 bringing increased risk of spread of infectious disease and other public health problems. The fight for dwindling resourc- es along the seams of civilization are harbingers of fu- ture U.S. involvement. If the United States is obliged or

    1. https://www.iom.int/wmr/chapter-2


    chooses to respond in a humanitarian or military fashion to alleviate conflict or provide stability, then the impor- tance of recognizing climate-related impacts allows for planners to be proactive rather than reactive in formu- lating a response.

    Rising Seas and Changing Coastal Geography

    Coastal flooding is a persistent but acute cause of hu- man displacement. Historically, flood waters recede and people return to their homes. Warming changes this calculus, with rising seas introducing the possibility of permanent displacement of tens, even hundreds of millions of inhabitants of high-risk coastal areas.

    The relationship between climate change and interna- tional security is not well understood because climate’s largest effects on conflict and governance are indirect, mediated through a variety of effects on weather. These sustained shifts in weather in turn produce a wide va- riety of impacts from one pole to the other and from the sea to the highest mountains. Nevertheless, we can make logical predictions of potential conflict, disruption of trade and humanitarian crises given known risks and exacerbating factors. Consider the case of Bangladesh, a nation with a history of disastrous seasonal flooding. According to one observer, “[Located] in the Ganges Delta, made up of 230 major rivers and streams, 160 million people live in a place one-fifth the size of France and as flat as chapati…”8 Almost half of the population of Bangladesh lives at sea level.9 As seas rise and huge areas of Bangladesh become uninhabitable, where will tens of millions of displaced Bangladeshis go? How will this large scale displacement affect global security in a region with nearly 40% of the world’s population and several antagonistic nuclear powers? For a recent secu-

    1. Harris, Gardiner. “Borrowed Time on Disappearing Land.” The New York Times. 2014. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/29/world/ asia/facing-rising-seas-bangladesh-confronts-the-consequenc- es-of-climate-change.html.
  • Greenfieldboyce, Nell. “Study: 634 Million People at Risk from Rising Seas.” National Public Radio. 2007. https://www.npr.org/ templates/story/story.php?storyId=9162438.

  • rity crisis benchmark, look at Syria.10

    The Syrian civil war has been an international disaster with humanitarian and security impacts in the Middle East, Africa and Europe that will continue long into the future. Pre-war Syria had a population of about 22 mil- lion.11 Almost five million Syrians have fled the country since the start of the civil war.12 A host of factors con- tributed to the outbreak of civil war with causality still a matter of debate. There is, however, no question that the conflict erupted coincident with a major drought in the region which forced rural people into Syrian cities as large numbers of Iraqi refugees arrived.13 The Syri- an civil war has reignited civil war in Iraq, and brought the U.S. and Russian militaries into close contact under difficult circumstances. The Syrian population has de- clined by about ten percent since the start of the war, with millions of refugees fleeing the nation, increasing instability in Europe, and stoking violent extremism.14

    By comparison, Bangladesh has eight times Syria’s population, and a conflicted history as a former part of Pakistan. Bangladesh is a predominantly Muslim nation locked between India and Burma. The latter is already under international scrutiny for its poor treatment of the Rohingya minority, the largest percentage of which have

    1. Some claim that the Syrian civil war resulted from drought-in- duced migration, a secondary effect of climate change. We do

    not make that argument here, as recent research questions this relationship. See Selby, Jan, Omar S. Dahi, Christiane Fröhlich, and Mike Hulme. “Climate change and the Syrian civil war revisited.” Political Geography 60: 232-244. 2017. https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0962629816301822.

    1. Barbash, Fred. “U.N.: Nearly half of Syria’s population uprooted by civil war.” The Washington Post. 2014. https://www. washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/08/29/u-n-near- ly-half-of-syrias-population-uprooted-by-civil-war/?utm_term=. eaa5e39e17b7.
  • “The Syrian Refugee Crisis and its Repercussions for the E.U.” Migration Policy Centre. 2016. http://syrianrefugees.eu/.

  • Hammer, Joshua. “Is a Lack of Water to Blame for the Conflict in Syria?” Smithsonian Magazine. 2013. https://www.smithsonian- mag.com/innovation/is-a-lack-of-water-to-blame-for-the-conflict-in- syria-72513729/.

  • “The Syrian Refugee Crisis and its Repercussions for the E.U.” Migration Policy Centre. 2016. http://syrianrefugees.eu/.

  • 8

    fled to Bangladesh. India is a nuclear-armed state per- petually on the verge of conflict with its nuclear-armed western neighbor, Pakistan. Indeed, Bangladesh’s exis- tence is the result of a war between those two nations. The permanent displacement of a large portion of the population of Bangladesh would be a regional catastro- phe with the potential to increase global instability. This is a potential result of climate change complications in just one country.

    Globally, over 600 million people live at sea level.15 Sea level rise also poses a direct threat to Army/DoD instal- lations and missions worldwide. The DoD must assess the vulnerabilities to installations and risks to mission at all locations, prioritizing those most at risk. Early recog- nition of the complex risks will allow planning and im- plementation to best mitigate the risk and spread costs out over multiple budgetary periods. The 2018 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) mandates that the Department of Defense submit a report to Congress with respect to the impact of climate change on DoD missions. Specifically, the NDAA requires that the report include “vulnerabilities to military installations and com- batant commander requirements resulting from climate change over the next 20 years.”16 There are currently numerous studies already extant that detail the risks to military installations, some of them executed by govern- ment organizations, including the Army Corps of Engi- neers. Additionally, this report will examine mitigations to the risk associated with climate change impacts.

    Opening the Arctic

    The Arctic is undergoing some of the most significant and noticeable effects of climate change anywhere on the globe. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), since satellite monitoring of the Arctic began in 1979, the Arctic ice extent has de-

    1. Greenfieldboyce, Nell. “Study: 634 Million People at Risk from Rising Seas.” National Public Radio. 2007. https://www.npr.org/ templates/story/story.php?storyId=9162438.
  • “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018.” 115th Congress of the United States of America. 2017. https://www. congress.gov/115/bills/hr2810/BILLS-115hr2810enr.pdf.

  • creased from 3.5 – 4.1%.17 Furthermore, the IPCC pre- dicts with high confidence that the Arctic will warm more rapidly than other parts of the globe through at least the year 2100, well beyond the horizon of this study.18 This warming will cause further diminishment of the Arctic ice, presenting many economic opportunities and secu- rity challenges for the United States and its allies.

    As the sea ice in the Arctic continues to decrease, there are greater opportunities for all nations to take advan- tage of new shipping routes between ports in Asia and those in Europe or Eastern North America. According to researchers at the University of Reading in the UK, even if emissions diminish, as proposed by the Paris Accords, by 2050 opportunities for non-modified (that is, ships that are not double hulled or specifically de- signed for transit through ice prone environments) ves- sels to transit the Arctic Ocean will double. Furthermore, many of those journeys could take place directly across the pole in international waters, avoiding transit fees.19 From a money and time saving perspective, these shorter routes will be more and more attractive to ship- ping companies as the ice recedes. Currently, a typical East Asia to Rotterdam route, transiting the Suez Canal, takes about 30 days. The most conservative estimates of sea ice change estimate non-specialized vessels will be able to complete that route across the Arctic in 23 days and that that route would be available for over half the year.20

    Furthermore, according to a 2008 U.S. Geological sur- vey, the Arctic likely holds approximately one quarter of the world’s undiscovered hydrocarbon reserves.21 Though the United States territorially possesses only a

    1. “Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report.” International Panel on Climate Change. 2015. http://ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/.
  • Ibid.

  • Amos, Jonathan. “Arctic Ocean shipping routes ‘to open for months’.” BBC News. 2016. http://www.bbc.com/news/science-en- vironment-37286750.

  • Ibid. 21. Ibid.

  • 9

    small percentage of the Arctic area, estimates are that 20% of those undiscovered reserves are potentially in U.S. territory.22 However, territorial claims in the Arctic are not well established and continue to be disputed amongst the Arctic nations.23 As the extent of the re- sources available in the Arctic become more evident, there is a greater potential for conflict. The United States is likely to reach accommodation with allies in the region, but Russia’s global pattern of aggression and attempts to reestablish great power status may set conditions for another flashpoint in the Arctic. The Arctic waters may make this evidently a Navy and Air Force issue, however the Army will be tasked with wide area security and re- connaissance roles as part of any joint efforts to secure Arctic interests.

    Russia probably has the greatest immediate security concerns as it already earns transit fees from shipping companies using its Arctic waters. Russia has embarked on a rapid build-up in the Arctic, including expensive re- furbishment of Soviet era Arctic bases. Russia’s current Arctic plans include the opening of ten search and res- cue stations, 16 deep water ports, 13 airfields and ten air defense sites.24 (See Figure 3, below.25) These devel- opments create not only security outposts for Russia, but also threats to the U.S. mainland. Russia’s recent development of KH-101/102 air launched cruise mis- siles and SSC-8 ground launched cruise missiles po- tentially put much of the United States at risk from low altitude, radar evading, nuclear capable missiles.

    Figure 3: Map of bases and estimated hydrocarbon reserves in the Arctic

    1. “The U.S. Stakes Its Claim in the Arctic Frontier.” Stratfor. 2015. https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/us-stakes-its-claim-arctic-fron- tier.
  • Millstein, Seth. “Who Owns the Arctic? And Who Doesn’t?” Timeline. 2016. https://timeline.com/who-owns-the-arctic-2b9513b- 3b2a3.

  • Nudelman, Mike and Jeremy Bender. “This map shows Russia’s dominant militarization of the Arctic.” Business Insider. 2015. http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-russias-militariza- tion-of-arctic-2015-8.

  • Ibid.

  • 10

    Russia is not the only nation considering security expan- sion in the Arctic. Since 2013, the United States Coast Guard has budgeted for the development and fielding of a new Polar Class heavy icebreaker to augment the one heavy and one medium icebreaker they now have in service. To date they have received almost $191 mil- lion in funding toward the acquisition, estimated to cost just less than $1 billion.26 The FY2018 National Defense Authorization Act authorized the full procurement of the vessel.27

    The relatively rapid pace of change in the Arctic will gen- erate opportunities, forecast and unexpected, on which nations around the world will capitalize. However, with any advantage comes the need to secure it. The United States must be prepared not only to seize any opportu- nities, but also to protect those assets and project pow- er into newly accessible areas. All of these factors sug- gest that military operations in the Arctic will become more common.

    Increased Range of Insect-Borne Diseases

    Infectious diseases remain a concern for expeditionary forces and indigenous populations alike. As the climate changes, the distribution and prevalence of endemic diseases will change. Diseases that were endemic be- fore could become altered and mutate to new regions. Extensive research has shown local weather condi- tions and other related environmental factors strongly influence vector-borne diseases. 2829 Diseases caused

    1. “Report to Congress on Coast Guard Icebreaker Program.” USNI News. 2017. https://news.usni.org/2017/12/13/report-con- gress-coast-guard-icebreaker-program?utm_source=Sail- thru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=EBB 12.14.17&utm_ term=Editorial – Early Bird Brief.
  • “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018.” 115th Congress of the United States of America. 2017. https://www. congress.gov/115/bills/hr2810/BILLS-115hr2810enr.pdf.

  • “Vector-Borne Diseases Fact Sheet.” World Health Organiza- tion. October 2017. Accessed December 2017. http://www.who.int/ mediacentre/factsheets/fs387/en/.

  • Githeko, Andrew K., Steve W. Lindsay, Ulisses E. Confalonieri, and Jonathon A. Patz. “Climate change and vector-borne diseases: a regional analysis.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 78,

  • by a wide array of pathogens including bacteria, spiro-

    chetes, rickettsiae, protozoa, viruses, nematodes and

    fungi spread through arthropods (i.e. ticks and mosqui-

    toes) are highly susceptible to localized weather condi-

    tions. 30, 31 The 2016 IPCC report and National Climate

    Assessment concluded there was an increased risk of

    some vector-borne diseases and that climate variability

    can alter the incidence of diseases carried by vectors

    (e.g., mosquitoes, fleas, ticks) through effects on vector

    geographic distribution, vector and pathogen biology,

    respectively.32 Indeed, some major vector-borne diseas-

    es in the U.S. have doubled or even tripled since 2005.


    Examples of vector-borne diseases likely susceptible to

    change include: Malaria, Dengue, Chikungunya, Leish-

    maniasis, Lyme disease and Zika.

    Consider the case of malaria, perhaps the most lethal infectious disease in the world. In 2015, the World Health Organization reported there were an estimated 304 mil- lion global cases and 639,000 deaths. 35 While consid- erable efforts aim at eradicating the disease through vaccine development, the international public health community continues to struggle with the extent of the

    no. 9: 1136. 2000. http://www.who.int/bulletin/archives/78(9)1136. pdf.

    1. Luber, George, and Kim Knowlton. “Human Health.” National Climate Assessment. 2014. https://nca2014.globalchange.gov/ report/sectors/human-health.
  • “Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases.” Medscape. Accessed December, 2017. https://reference.medscape.com/slideshow/ tick-borne-illnesses-6006369.

  • Chrétien, Jean-Paul. “Adapting to Health Impacts of Climate Change in the Department of Defense.” Health Security 14, no. 2: 86-92. 2016. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27081888.

  • “Illnesses on the rise.” Centers for Disease Control and Pre- vention. 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/vector-borne/index. html.

  • Chrétien, Jean-Paul. “Adapting to Health Impacts of Climate Change in the Department of Defense.” Health Security 14, no. 2: 86-92. 2016. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27081888.

  • “Fact Sheet: World Malaria Report 2016.” World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/malaria/media/world-malaria-re- port-2016/en/.

  • 34


    disease.36 Today, the DoD and members of the U.S. In- telligence Community assess the risk of malaria to U.S. forces operating in East Africa 37 as high to intermediate depending on the country. A high-risk represents “an operationally significant attack rate (potentially 11-50% per month) could occur among personnel exposed to mosquito bites.” 38

    The average projected climate changes in East Africa by 2050 show temperatures between 25-30° C. The projected average precipitation shows increased rain- fall in select countries. Coupling the generally optimal conditions for malaria carrying mosquitos with the ex- pected climate conditions in 2050, we can conclude that the environment will likely be much more favorable to malarial vectors.39 The temperatures and increase of precipitation may lead to decreasing parasite devel- opment, more stable adult populations and increased bite rates.40 It is also fair to conclude the more favorable conditions could lead to an increase of the prevalence of malaria.

    Decreased Fresh Water Availability and Increased Demand

    By 2040, the global demand for fresh water projects to exceed availability. As water availability decreases, the opportunity for social disruption will increase. Although the National Intelligence Council does not predict wa-

    1. “Malaria.” Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. https://www. gatesfoundation.org/What-We-Do/Global-Health/Malaria. Accessed December 2017.
  • The countries in the East Africa region for this study are; Sudan, South Sudan, Uganda, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Tanzania, Eritrea, Djibiouti, Ethiopia, Somalia, Kenya.

  • Defense Intelligence Agency, National Center for Medical Intel- ligence, Infectious Disease Risk Assessment Methodology.

  • Craig, M. H., R. W. Snow, and D. Le Sueur. “A climate-based distribution model of malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Afri- ca.” Parasitol Today 15, no. 3: 105-11. 1999. https://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pubmed/10322323?dopt=Abstract.

  • Patz, J. A., and S. H. Olson. “Malaria risk and temperature: Influences from global climate change and local land use practic- es.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103, no. 15: 5635-636. 2006. https://www.pnas.org/content/103/15/5635.

  • ter shortage alone will lead to failed states,41 the lack of water resources amplifies underlying existing issues such as lack of technology, poor governance, and in- adequate economic resilience.42 There are several fac- tors contributing to the global water shortage including: population increase, climate change, and poor water management.43 North Africa, Southern Africa, the Mid- dle East, China, and the United States all have areas where the water deficiency is greater than 50%. By 2030, one-third of the world population is projected to

    inhabit these water-stressed regions.

    agreements designed to share the scarce resource. However, there is a growing concern that as demand outstrips supply, water will become a bargaining weap- on to accrue power, deprive access to vulnerable pop- ulations or even enable sabotage to disrupt supply

    and achieve desired effects.

    coastal fresh water supplies and agriculture at risk, as salt water moves inland, polluting rivers and aquifers,


    es across the globe, water has prompted cooperative

    and literally salting the earth.



    Rising seas also place

    In several plac-


    1. Engel, Rich. “National Intelligence Council Water Research.” National Intelligence Council. 2012. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/ sites/default/files/Engel Presentation.pdf
  • “Global Water Security.” National Intelligence Council. 2012, https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/Special%20Report_ICA%20 Global%20Water%20Security.pdf.

  • “Implications for US National Security of Anticipated Climate Change.” CENTRA Technology, Inc, and Scitor Corporation. 2016. https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/Newsroom/Reports and Pubs/ Implications_for_US_National_Security_of_Anticipated_Climate_ Change.pdf.

  • Ibid.

  • Ibid.

  • Ibid.

  • Kenney, Carolyn. “Climate Change, Water Security,

  • and U.S. National Security.” Center for American Progress.

    1. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/security/re- ports/2017/03/22/428918/climate-change-water-security-u-s-na- tional-security/.
  • Paris, Aubrey. “Sea Level Rise: Sink or Swim.” United States Army War College – War Room. 2017. https://warroom.armywarcol- lege.edu/articles/sea-level-rise-sink-swim/.

  • 12

    The predicted rise in average global temperatures equates to the need for more water to sustain all life. As ambient temperatures rise, so does the risk of rais- ing body temperature. Proper water consumption rates reduce this risk if there is water readily available to con- sume. As the rigor of activities increases so does the need for increased hydration. Simultaneously as the demand for water increases in a warmer climate, the amount of water readily available for use is reduced due to evaporation.49 The combination of expeditionary sol- diers fighting in a hot climate with scarce water supplies exacerbates logistical requirements.

    Saltwater intrusion is another factor increasing the risk for conflict in coastal areas with large populations. As the need for more water increases, fossil freshwater aquifers are tapped which are not replenished. Re- duced water levels in some coastal aquifers can lead to increased salinity as a result of the intrusion of seawater into the aquifer. Typically, a water table in a coastal area pushes fresh water to the ocean, but in this case, the salt water makes its way into the aquifer rendering it un- usable. (See Figure 4.)

    Figure 4: Ground-water flow patterns and the zone of

    dispersion in an idealized, homogeneous coastal aqui- fer50

    Decreased Food Security and Food System Stability

    The United Nations (UN) Food Agricultural Organization (FAO) defines food security as a state when “all peo- ple, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient safe and nutritious food that meets their di- etary needs and food preferences for an active healthy life.”51 Food security is premised on four components: food availability, food accessibility, food utilization and food system stability.52 (See Table 1, next page.) In its broadest terms, food security is the ability to have con- sistent access to food that is safe and meets dietary guidelines.53

    1. Cooper, H.H. “Saltwater Intrusion.” United States Geologic Survey. 1964. https://water.usgs.gov/ogw/gwrp/saltwater/salt.html.
  • “The State of Food and Agriculture: Climate Change Agricul- ture, and Food Security.” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2016. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6030e.pdf.

  • “Climate Change, Global Food Security, and the U.S. Food System.” USDA. 2015. https://www.usda.gov/oce/climate_change/ FoodSecurity2015Assessment/FullAssessment.pdf.

  • “Dietary Guidelines.” U.S. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. 2019. https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/.

  • “Climate Impacts on Water Resources.” The United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2017. https://19january2017snap- shot.epa.gov/climate-impacts/climate-impacts-water-resources. html.

  • 13

    Table 1: The Components of Food Security

    Source: “Climate Change, Global Good Security, and the U.S. Food System.” USDA. 2015.

    For seven out of eight Americans,54 food insecurity is a problem relegated to places far afield from the con- tinental United States. In fact, compared to 113 coun- tries across the globe, the U.S. ranks second on the

    consistently led the world in global agricultural exports, long a source of economic power and global influence.

    When food systems fail, whether a failure of agricultur- al production, a supply chain failure that interferes with food processing or transport, or economic or financial disruption affecting demand, outbreaks of civil conflict and social unrest become more likely.58 Global food se- curity hinges on the production of four crops: maize, wheat, rice, and soybeans.59 These commodities, along with a long list of foodstuffs moving through both formal and informal channels, are the core outputs of the glob- al food system – the poorly defined, highly dynamic, complex web of transfers and interactions. Climate-in-

    Studies.” National Intelligence Council. 2012. https://www.dni.gov/ files/documents/nic/NICR 2012-23 Global Food Security FINAL.pdf.

    1. Barbet-Gros, Julie and Jose Cuestra. “Food Riots: From Definition to Operationalization.” The World Bank. 2015. http://www. worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/Poverty%20doc- uments/Introduction%20Guide%20for%20the%20Food%20Riot%20 Radar.pdf.
  • Winkler, Elizabeth. “How the climate crisis could become a food crisis overnight.” The Washington Post. 2017. https://www. washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/07/27/how-the-climate- crisis-could-become-a-food-crisis-overnight/?noredirect=on&utm_ term=.e9f324e6c009.

  • Global Food Security Index.


    The U.S. spends 6.4 % of

    its income on food compared to countries such as Pa-

    kistan, Philippines, and Nigeria where a typical house-

    hold spends more than 40 % of their earnings for suste-


    to food are more vulnerable to fluctuations in food com- modity prices. Recent effects of price shocks because of food availability have occurred in crisis areas such as Syria and Venezuela. Price fluctuations in food will affect countries differently. Countries that rely heavily on im- ports will be most affected.57 The U.S., in contrast, has

    1. “Overview: Food Security in the U.S.” USDA. 2018. https:// http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security- in-the-us/.
  • “Global Food Security Index for 2017” The Economist Intelli- gence Unit. 2017. https://foodsecurityindex.eiu.com/Resources.

  • Gray, Alex. “Which countries spend the most on food? This map will show you.” World Economic Forum. 2016. https://www.weforum. org/agenda/2016/12/this-map-shows-how-much-each-country- spends-on-food/.

  • “Global Food Security: Market Forces and Selected Case

  • 56

    Populations that dedicate more of their income


    fluenced impacts on food systems beyond impacts on

    crop production include interruption of planting or har-

    vest due to adverse weather, rapid freeze-thaw cycles

    in spring and fall,60 soil degradation, depletion of fossil

    water aquifers, intensified spread of agricultural pests

    and diseases,61,62 and damage to shipping infrastruc-

    ture as a consequence of flooding.63 During a global

    food crisis in 2007-2008, social unrest was reported

    in 61 affected countries.64 In war-time, the ability of the

    U.S. and allies to cooperate through extraordinary insti-

    tutional innovations delivered under great duress, such

    as the Combined Food Board, improved provisioning of

    U.S. and allied war fighters, munitions workers and ci-


    War, these institutions have been dismantled in the U.S. as the policy of supply management, driven by the U.S. population’s needs, shifted to policies that have em- phasized agricultural exports as a critical component of

    ing countries that are also food insecure.67 Population increases, coupled with the food demand and effects of climate change disrupting crop production will likely result in price instability.68 Furthermore, the wild card of weaponized genome editing and, more generally, hori- zontal environmental genetic alteration agents (HEGAA) applied to agriculture and food systems already under interacting stress from climate change, define a no-an- alogue future..69

    Climate change will have diverse impacts on local, re- gional and global food system stability, far beyond its immediate effects on agricultural production affecting both availability of food and the resilience of underly- ing ecosystems.70 Changes in the length and stability of growing seasons around the world, altered precipitation patterns resulting in droughts, high night temperatures, floods or shifted seasonal patterns will also impact crop production.71 Some evidence indicates that rising CO

    Through the decades since the Second World


    the U.S. balance of trade.

    Where climate change damages agricultural produc- tion, security concerns will likely follow. The world pop- ulation is expected to increase by 39% between 2005 and 2050, and 95% of that growth will occur in develop-

    1. Sinha, Tushar and Keith A. Cherkauer. “Impacts of future climate change on soil frost in the midwestern United States.” Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 115, D08105. https://doi. org/10.1029/2009JD012188.
  • Lenne, Jillian. “Climate change, crop plant diseases and future food production.” World Agriculture. 2018. http://www. world-agriculture.net/article/climate-change-crop-plant-diseases- and-future-food-production.

  • Deutsh, Curtis A. et al. “Increase in crop losses to insect pests in a warming climate.” Science. 2018. http://science.sciencemag. org/content/361/6405/916.editor-summary.

  • “Extreme Weather” in “National Climate Assessment.” U.S. Global Change Research Program. 2014. https://nca2014.global- change.gov/highlights/report-findings/extreme-weather.

  • Ibid.

  • Roll, Eric. The Combined Food Board: A Study in Wartime Inter-

  • national Planning. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1956.

    1. Collingham, Lizzie. The Taste of War. New York: Penguin Press, 2011: 481-501.


    2 levels may increase crop yields to some extent via an

    effect known as CO2 fertilization.72 However, altered crop growth may affect nutrient composition, especially micronutrients such as zinc and iron, resulting in signifi- cant increases in mortality in vulnerable locations, which are those where DoD-supported humanitarian interven-

    1. Alexandratos, Nikos and Jelle Bruinsma. “World Agriculture Towards 2030/2050.” United Nations Food and Agriculture Organi- zation. 2012. http://www.fao.org/3/a-ap106e.pdf.
  • “Global Food Security.” National Intelligence Council: Intelli- gence Community Assessment. 2015. https://www.dni.gov/files/ documents/Newsroom/Reports and Pubs/Global_Food_Securi- ty_ICA.pdf.

  • Reeves, R.G. et al. “Agricultural research or a new bioweapon system?” Science 362 (6410): 35-37. 2018. http://science.science- mag.org/content/362/6410/35.

  • “The State of Food and Agriculture: Climate Change, Agricul- ture, and Food Security.” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2016. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6030e.pdf.

  • “Climate Change and Food Security: A Framework Docu- ment.” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2008. http://www.fao.org/3/k2595e/k2595e00.htm.

  • Kirscbaum, M.U.F. Plant Phys 155(1): 117-124. 2011. https:// doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.166819.

  • 15

    tion is most likely.73 Increased CO2 levels in the oceans and changes in ocean temperature will alter the avail- ability of fish and could potentially lead to the extinction

    Changes in temperature will also

    continue to draw in Army and other DoD resources.

    In September 2016, U.S. the Intelligence Community

    (IC) conducted analysis of possible impacts of climate

    change on national security over the next 20 years.79

    Their report highlighted the projected occurrence of

    more extreme weather and how damaging it may be to

    natural systems such as oceans, lakes, rivers, ground

    water, reefs, and forests. Most of the critical infrastruc-

    tures identified by the Department of Homeland Security

    are not built to withstand these altered conditions. The

    lower Mississippi River has sustained 100-, 200- and

    500-year floods (meaning the chance is 1% or less that

    a flood of that magnitude would occur 500 simulations

    of the current year) in the last 8 years. Between 2016

    and 2018, Ellicott City, Maryland sustained two 1,000-

    year floods.

    (80%) and imports (78%) are water-borne, floods that leave lasting damage to shipping infrastructure pose a major threat to U.S. lives and communities, the U.S. economy and global food security. The U.S. Intelligence Community’s 2016 study further emphasized the social and economic implications realized by damaging these systems. The increased urbanization of areas prone to these weather events will only further stress governmen- tal agencies tasked with recovery and support. Addi- tionally, the study captured potential instability of coun- tries, heightened social and political tensions, adverse effects on food prices and availability, increased risks to human health, negative impacts on investments and economic competitiveness.81

    1. “Implications for US National Security of Anticipated Climate Change.” US National Intelligence Council. 2016. https://www.dni. gov/files/documents/Newsroom/Reports and Pubs/Implications_ for_US_National_Security_of_


    1. Di Liberto, Tom. “Torrential rains bring epic flash floods in Maryland in late May 2018.” Climate.gov. 2018. https://www. climate.gov/news-features/event-tracker/torrential-rains-bring-epic- flash-floods-maryland-late-may-2018.
  • “Implications for US National Security of Anticipated Climate Change.” US National Intelligence Council. 2016. https://www.dni. gov/files/documents/Newsroom/Reports and Pubs/Implications_ for_US_National_Security_of_

  • Anticipated_Climate_Change.pdf

    of certain species.


    affect livestock by impacting their ability to thrive and

    provide adequate amounts of meat and milk.


    Increased Incidence of Extreme Weather

    Numerous climate models suggest that a warming cli- mate incurs more frequent extreme weather events and intensified weather patterns such as heat domes, polar vortices, super storms, monster ridges, and wider rang- es of extremes, especially in spring and fall in temperate climates.76 The U.S. Army is directly affected by these extremes, and has obligations connected to disaster recovery efforts related to a changing climate. Not only are Army personnel and installations at risk, the issue compounds when more than one major event occurs in a short interval or where natural disaster occurs where local social, political, and economic infrastructures are not resourced to handle the situation. Attention to a changing climate remains integral to the Army’s prepa- ration and response of devastating weather events like recent hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Harvey, Irma and Maria. Hurricane Michael in 2018 was the wettest hurricane on record, reflecting a more general trend of windier and wetter hurricanes.77,78 Natural disasters like these will

    1. Myers, S.S. et al. “Increasing CO2 Threatens Human Nutri- tion.” Nature 510(7503): 139-142. 2014. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/24805231.
  • “The State of Food and Agriculture: Climate Change, Agricul- ture, and Food Security.” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2016. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6030e.pdf.

  • Ibid.

  • “National Climate Assessment.” U.S. Global Change Research

  • Program. 2014. https://nca2014.globalchange.gov/report.

    1. Belles, Jonathan. “Hurricane Florence Was the Nation’s Second Wettest Storm Behind Harvey.” The Weather Channel. 2018. https://weather.com/storms/hurricane/news/2018-09-19-hur- ricane-florence-harvey-north-carolina.
  • “Hurricanes and Climate Change.” Union of Concerned Scientists. 2017. https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/sci- ence-and-impacts/impacts/hurricanes-and-climate-change.html.

  • 80

    Because most U.S. agricultural exports


    Stress to the Power Grid

    Changing levels of rainfall put the U.S.’s energy grid at risk. Over 7.3 billion people currently inhabit the plan-

    • Loss of heating/air conditioning and electrical lighting systems

    • Loss of computer, telephone, and communica- tions systems (including airline flights, satellite networks and GPS services)

    • Loss of public transportation systems

    • Loss of fuel distribution systems and fuel pipe- lines

    • Loss of all electrical systems that do not have back-up power87

    The Presidential Policy Directive-Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience lists 16 critical infrastructures susceptible to power grid failure that directly tie to U.S. national security and the homeland defense mission of the Department of Defense (DoD).88 The Congressional Electro-Magnetic Pulse (EMP) Commission, in 2008, es- timated it would cost $2 billion to harden just the grid’s

    et, a little more than half of which live in cities.

    United States alone, ten cities contain more than one million people, and more than 35 with a population of over 500,000.83,84 The power grid that serves the United States is aging and continues to operate without a co- ordinated and significant infrastructure investment. Vul- nerabilities exist to electricity-generating power plants, electric transmission infrastructure and distribution system components. Power transformers average over 40 years of age and 70 percent of transmission lines are 25 years or older. The U.S. national power grid is susceptible to coordinated cyber or physical attacks; electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attacks; space weather; and other natural events, to include the stressors of a changing climate.85,86

    Effects of climate abnormalities over time introduce the possibility of taxing an already fragile system through increased energy requirements triggered by extended periods of heat, drought, cold, etc. If the power grid in- frastructure were to collapse, the United States would experience significant

    • Loss of perishable foods and medications

    • Loss of water and wastewater distribution sys- tems

    1. Giegengack, Robert. “The Carrington Coronal Mass Ejection of 1859.“ Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 159, no. 4: 425-426. 2015.
  • “Ten U.S. Cities Now Have 1 Million People or More; California and Texas Each Have Three of These Places.” United States Cen- sus Bureau. 2015. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-re- leases/2015/cb15-89.html.

  • “U.S. City Populations 2018.” World Population Review. 2018. http://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/.

  • “Large Power Transformers and the U.S. Electric Grid,” U.S. Department of Energy. 2012. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/ files/Large Power Transformer Study – June 2012_0.pdf.

  • “Transmission & Distribution Infrastructure: A Harris Williams & Co. White Paper” Harris Williams & Co. 2014.

  • https://www.harriswilliams.com/sites/default/files/industry_reports/ ep_td_white_paper_06_10_14_final.pdf.



    In the

    critical nodes.


    The Task Force on National and Home-

    land Security calculates an additional $10 to $30 billion

    and many years necessary for a complete grid over-


    the very improvements of network interconnectedness created through the updated Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) network, which control pow- er distribution around the country, introduced additional weaknesses to cyber-attack.91 The Center for Security

    1. “Space Weather.” Department of Homeland Security. No date. Accessed November 10, 2017. https://www.ready.gov/ space-weather.
  • “Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience.” The White House, Presidential Policy Directive. 2013. https://obamawhite- house.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/12/presidential-poli- cy-directive-critical-infrastructure-security-and-resil.

  • Graham, William R. et al. “Critical National Infrastructures.” Re- port of Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse Attack. 2008. http://www.empcommission. org/docs/A2473-EMP_Commission-7MB.pdf.

  • “A Call to Action for America.” Task Force on National and Homeland Security, Secure the Grid Coalition, and Other Partners. 2017. https://emptaskforce.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/CAA- 7-31-17.pdf.

  • Graham, William R. et al. “Critical National Infrastructures.” Re-

  • port of Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from


    The EMP Commission further cited that some of

    Policy reported that capability and capacity to repair or replace power grid unique infrastructure is reliant on production timelines exceeding a year. Most of these production facilities reside outside the United States, greatly adding to repair times and exacerbating vulner- ability.92

    Defense of the homeland requires reliable access to power generation capabilities to protect critical infra- structure areas, maintain sovereign security, and pro- vide aid to the nation’s population when needed. De- partment of Defense installations are 99 percent reliant on the U.S. power grid for electrical power generation due to the decommissioning of autonomous power generation capability for budgetary cost saving mea- sures over the last two decades.93

    While generators would allow continued operations for a time, a long-term outage of the power grid would rapidly erode the ability to perform numerous missions as re- sources were diverted toward humanitarian assistance/ disaster response operations in the homeland.

    Relief efforts aggravated by seasonal climatological effects would potentially accelerate the criticality of the developing situation. The cascading effects of power loss, as depicted below, would rapidly challenge the military’s ability to continue operations. (See Figure 5.94)

    Figure 5: Essential Services Interconnectedness Affected by Power Grid Outage

    Electromagnetic Pulse Attack. 2008. http://www.empcommission. org/docs/A2473-EMP_Commission-7MB.pdf.

    1. “Guilty knowledge: What the US Government Knows about the Vulnerability of the Electric Grid, But Refuses to Fix.” Center for Security Policy. 2014. https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/ wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Guilty-Knowledge-6×9.pdf.
  • Koppel, Ted. Lights Out: A Cyberattack, a Nation Unprepared, Surviving the Aftermath. New York, NY: Crown Publishers, 2015: 216.

  • Jamieson, Isaac. “Addendum – EMP & Cyber Security” in

  • Smart Meters – Smarter Practices: Solving Emerging Problems.

    EM-Radiation Research Trust. 2012. https://www.radiationresearch. org/articles/smart-meters-smarter-practices-document/.


    While securing the U.S. power grid will take a whole of government approach, the Joint Force’s responsibili- ty to defend the homeland is the strongest reason for DoD to prioritize funding towards a solution. The Ser- vices must be clear in their assessment of installation vulnerability to an outage of the power grid and the con- sequences for homeland through missile defense, De- fense Support to Civil Authorities, and military response to direct threats. Response delays in any of these areas will impair any effort to stabilize the situation or quickly respond to crisis anywhere in the United States.

    Aside from power distribution concerns, our power gen- eration capabilities are also at risk. Due to their water demands, safety requirements, and locations adjacent to waterways, nuclear power stations in the United States are at high risk of temporary or permanent clo- sure due to climate threats, as demonstrated by the ex- ample facilities in Connecticut and Tennessee. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) authorizes the current operation of 99 nuclear reactors, including both pressurized and boiling water reactors (PWR; BWR), which supplied 19.7% of the country’s utility-scale en- ergy in 2016.95 In general, the country’s reliance on nu- clear energy has increased marginally over time, with a net 1.2% increase in nuclear-generated electricity from 2016 to 2017.

    Ultimately, 59 (or 60%) of the country’s nuclear reactors exist in regions that are likely to suffer from one or more climate threats. These regions include New England (major risk: sea level rise), Mid-Atlantic (major risks: sea level rise and/or severe storms), South Atlantic (major risks: sea level rise and/or severe storms), and East South Central (major risk: water shortage). Based on their locations, 100% of reactors in New England, 26% in the Mid-Atlantic region, 38% in the South Atlantic re- gion, and 100% in the East South Central region are at risk of experiencing major climate threats.

    1. “FAQ: What is U.S. electricity generation by energy source?” U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2018. https://www.eia.gov/ tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3.

    The dangers facing some of these reactors have not gone unnoticed. For instance, Florida’s Saint Lucie Nuclear Power Plant was shut down during Hurricane Matthew in 2016.96 Operation of its sister facility, Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station, was similarly ceased during Hurricane Irma in 2017.97 Furthermore, expan- sion projects at Turkey Point, with proposals and con- struction spanning the last decade, have been criticized by several South Florida government officials who cite the challenge of rising sea levels.98 New Jersey’s Oyster Creek BWR will be decommissioned by the end of 2019 because of an unwillingness to construct costly cooling towers;99 these structures will become increasingly im- portant for reactors operating in regions where warming trends are apparent. Such complications, critiques, and closures are examples of impending climate change impacts on other nuclear energy facilities in the United States.

    While it is true that nearly all types of energy infrastruc- ture may suffer from climate changes unique to their lo- cations, the only clean energy facilities likely to suffer as much or more than nuclear plants are their hydroelectric counterparts. In fact, hydropower’s reliance on steady water access makes this sector particularly susceptible to climate-induced dryness. Experts expect drought to reduce hydropower generation due to declining reser- voir levels, observed in 2007 when drought caused a

    30% decrease in hydroelectric capacity in Tennessee.


    1. Prasad, Nithin. “FPL says Saint Lucie 2 Florida reactor shut ahead of Matthew.” Reuters. 2016. https://www.reuters.com/article/ us-storm-matthew-florida-nuclearpower/fpl-says-saint-lucie-2-flori- da-reactor-shut-ahead-of-matthew-idUSKCN1262I5.
  • Gardner, Timothy. “Florida nuclear plants to shut ahead of Hurricane Irma.” Reuters. 2017. https://www.reuters. com/article/us-storm-irma-nuclearpower/florida-nucle- ar-plants-to-shut-ahead-of-hurricane-irma-idUSKCN1BI2IA.

  • Staletovich, Jenny. “Mayors make case against FPL nuclear expansion.” Miami Herald. 2018. http://www.miamiherald.com/ news/local/community/miami-dade/article18627960.html.

  • Oglesby, Amanda. “Christie: Oyster Creek shutdown sched- ule.” Asbury Park Press. 2017. http://www.app.com/story/news/ local/land-environment/2017/10/05/oyster-creek-early-clos- ing/735491001/.

  • Tennessee River Drought Management Plan, http://web.knox-

  • 19

    This is consequential due to the nation’s increasing de- mand for hydropower. In 2016, hydropower comprised 6.5% of utility-scale energy generated in the United States, making up the largest component (44%) of the country’s renewable energy.101

    From 2016 to 2017, a net 10.6% increase in U.S. hy- dropower generation was recorded. These numbers indicate that the two regions having the second- and third-fastest increase in hydropower usage (i.e., East South Central and West South Central) are also at high risk of future temperature increases and prolonged drought. Currently, 47 and 34 hydropower plants are op- erating in the East South Central and West South-Cen- tral regions, respectively, totaling at least 81 facilities that could suffer from reduced capacity in the near future.

    Challenge 2: Climate Change and the So- cial, Economic, and Political Environment

    Most of the preceding discussion of the physical en- vironmental implications of climate change should be familiar. Less commonly discussed are the social, po- litical, and economic effects of human concerns about climate change. Regardless of the actual physical ef- fects of climate change, the belief in climate change as a threat to the earth and its inhabitants is an increas- ing force in international politics.102 This suggests that to some extent the debate about whether the planet is warming, or if human activity is the cause, is irrelevant. If a powerful section of the human population believes that the planet is warming, believes that this warming is human-induced and that climate change is a threat, and if that section acts on those beliefs, climate change will have political, social, and economic consequences that the Army will be unable to ignore.


    1. “FAQ: What is U.S. electricity generation by energy source?” U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2018. https://www.eia.gov/ tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3.
  • “China, EU reaffirm Paris climate commitment, vow more cooperation.” Reuters. 2018. https://www.reuters.com/article/ us-china-eu-climatechange/china-eu-reaffirm-paris-climate-com- mitment-vow-more-cooperation-idUSKBN1K60TC.

  • To understand the impacts of the indirect effects of mo- bilization around climate change (as opposed to the direct, physical effects), we propose the SMaRT frame- work: Social, Market, Regulatory, and Technological re- sponses.

    Social Responses

    Climate change taps into profound fears of insecurity. Humans are highly motivated by symbols, and what more potent symbol is there of human thriving and the fragility of life than the planet itself? A recent Pew survey indicated that climate change trailed only ISIS globally as a security concern.103

    The population of the United States is also concerned about climate change. Gallup News published a sto- ry in March, 2017 titled “Global Warming Concern at Three-Decade High in the U.S.”104 The polling data to support the story showed that, from a post-9/11 low of 51% in 2011, now 67% of the population worry about global warming a “great deal” or a “fair amount”.105 This concern is most prevalent among today’s youth, indi- cating a propensity for the electorate to become more climate sensitive as that demographic ages.106

    Powerful symbols engender social mobilization and change. To have a huge effect on human affairs, these symbols need not be deeply rooted in reality. Conquests of the companions of Mohamed remade the Middle East and North Africa. The Protestant reformation trans- formed European civilization. The American Revolu-

    1. Poushter, Jacob and Dorothy Manevich. “Globally, People Point to ISIS and Climate Change as Leading Security Threats.” Pew Research Center. 2017. http://www.pewglobal.org/2017/08/01/ globally-people-point-to-isis-and-climate-change-as-leading-secu- rity-threats/.
  • Saad, Lydia. Gallup, “Global Warming Concern at Three-De- cade High in U.S.” Gallup News. 2017. https://news.gallup.com/ poll/206030/global-warming-concern-three-decade-high.aspx.

  • Ibid.

  • “Concern About Climate Change and Its Consequenc- es.” Pew Research Center. 2015. http://www.pewglobal. org/2015/11/05/1-concern-about-climate-change-and-its-conse- quences/climate-change-report-15/.

  • 20

    tion created a nation that would change the world. All of these phenomena derived much of their power from symbols. Grasping the power of the earth as a symbol requires little imagination compared to the nuances of Mohamed’s revelations, Luther’s theses, or the Ameri- can case for independence.

    Social mobilization around climate change will have winners and losers. Clear winners will be individuals and organizations perceived to be acting in the collective interest of both humanity and the natural environment. Clear losers will be individuals and entities whose ac- tions are perceived to undermine environmental stabili- ty. Increased access to mass communication platforms means that no single entity will control the narrative re- garding who these winners and losers are.

    What is the current perception of the U.S. Army, the

    U.S. military, or the U.S. government as a steward of the

    environment? We have no good data on this question.

    Anecdotally, the U.S. government is perceived to be an

    irresponsible actor in the global environment. The U.S.

    withdrawal from the Paris accords elicited strong reac-

    tions in the developed world.107 By contrast, although

    China is the largest carbon emitting nation,108 it has

    been more thoughtful about how it projects its image

    globally with respect to carbon emissions, and Chinese

    clean energy initiatives have been widely publicized in the U.S.109,110,111

    1. Shear, Michael D. and Alison Smale. “Leaders Lament U.S. Withdrawal but Say It Won’t Stop Climate Efforts.” The New York Times. 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/02/climate/par- is-climate-agreement-trump.html.
  • “Global Carbon Atlas.” Global Carbon Project. 2018. http:// http://www.globalcarbonatlas.org/en/CO2-emissions.

  • “China Steps Up Its Push into Clean Energy.” Bloomberg News. 2018. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti- cles/2018-09-26/china-sets-out-new-clean-energy-goals-penalties- in-revised-plan.

  • Dudley, Dominic. “China Is Set To Become The World’s Re- newable Energy Superpower, According To New Report.” Forbes. 2019. https://www.forbes.com/sites/dominicdudley/2019/01/11/ china-renewable-energy-superpower/ – 9eb1cfa745a2

  • Forsythe, Michael. “China Aims to Spend at Least $360 Bil- lion on Renewable Energy by 2020.” The New York Times. https://

  • The energy and pollution practices of the U.S. military have been subject to less scrutiny both domestically and abroad and have not yet risen to the level of urgen- cy of other issues such as sexual assault. However, as environmental and security concerns increasingly over- lap, the international perception of the U.S. as an irre- sponsible actor could have serious implications for the U.S. military, which relies on allies to maintain its glob- al posture. The U.S. military depends on access to the bases and ports of allies, it enjoys flyover privileges, and other preferential treatment. All of this exists because al- lies see the U.S. as aligned with their core interests. In the core powers of Europe, in the Commonwealth coun- tries, in Japan, and elsewhere, social mobilization due to perceived climate change has the potential to create a fundamental misalignment between the U.S. and its key allies.112 The U.S. may find itself more internationally isolated than at any times since its repudiation of the League of Nations.

    Market Responses

    The private sector will play the largest role as it explores ways to respond to society’s evolving need to “protect, retreat [from], or accommodate” activities that cause climate change.113 The market consequences of climate change are complex and ambiguous. Humanitarian and development organizations are also working intensely to build or rebuild markedly more resilient communities with enhanced distributed collective intelligence, de- centralized grid structures and other strategies that may improve overall resilience. In general, however, market consequences of climate change are complex and am-

    http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/05/world/asia/china-renewable-ener- gy-investment.html.

    1. Milman, Oliver. “G20 leaders’ statement on climate change highlights rift with US.” The Guardian. 2017. https://www.theguard- ian.com/world/2017/jul/08/g20-climate-change-leaders-statement- paris-agreement.
  • “Technologies for adaptation to climate change.” United Na- tions Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2006: 13. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/publications/tech_for_adapta- tion_06.pdf.

  • 21

    biguous. Highly entrenched economic interests may distort market signals. Global reductions in demand for hydrocarbons means that gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel should become less expensive. On the other hand, re- duced demand tends to reduce incentives to explore potential oil fields or build new refining facilities. Much of the U.S.’s domestic oil extraction is unprofitable at oil prices below $30 a barrel. Technological advances tend to push this number lower, but exhaustion of oil fields tends to push the number higher. In all scenarios, global declines in oil consumption increase the sensitivity of oil markets to the choices of large consumers like the U.S. DoD.

    Regulatory Responses

    Regulations will play a factor in driving the behavior of both consumers and private sector companies. By establishing standards such as fuel economy, limiting carbon emissions, setting greenhouse gas targets, or providing tax incentives for individuals, the regulatory arm of the government can be a powerful tool over the next 30 years. The United States’ participation in Orga- nization for Economic and Cooperation Development (OECD) will continue to provide opportunities to identify shared values with partner nations and set global tar- gets.

    Regulatory action often flows from collective interest in change. In the case of climate change, many regula- tions may create compliance challenges for the U.S. military. We think it unlikely that the U.S. government would restrict military carbon emissions in combat op- erations, for example. We are less optimistic about the absence of such restrictions on force development. In- deed, we consider it likely that at some point in the next two decades the U.S. government will introduce carbon emissions restrictions that affect non-combat military operations. While the Air Force can quickly increase its reliance on flight simulation, the Army remains wedded to training and practicing in live scenarios. This makes the Army highly susceptible to disruptions in readiness development should the government introduce carbon emissions restrictions.

    Technological Responses

    To mitigate the effects of climate change, government organizations, non-governmental organizations, and the private sector will need to pursue technological en- hancements. These enhancements must be “climate in- formed” so that improvements do not create unintend- ed vulnerabilities.114

    The clearest opportunities for climate-change related in- novation are in clean energy production, transmission, and storage. Each of these areas creates risks and op- portunities for the U.S. military. The automated, A.I.-en- hanced force of the Army’s future is one that runs on electricity, not JP-8. More efficient or resilient production of electricity through micro-nuclear power generation or improved solar arrays can fundamentally alter the mobility and the logistical challenges of a mechanized force. Light, quick-charging batteries (super-capacitors) have tremendous value in such a force; so does the wireless transmission of electrical current.115

    Innovations such as weather control and weather miti- gation techniques may serve to stave-off the worst im- pacts of climate change. For example, researchers are exploring ways to combat the effects of climate change through geoengineering. This controversial program in- volves either “capturing and storing some of the carbon dioxide that has already been emitted so that the atmo- sphere traps less heat or reflects more sunlight away from the earth so there is less heat to start with.”116 Other opportunities for technological change include weather

    1. Hallegatte, Stephane et al. Shock Waves: Managing the Im- pacts of Climate Change on Poverty. 2016. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Bakken, Gretchen. The Grid: The Fraying Wires Between Americans and Our Energy Future. New York: Bloomsbury, 2016: 201-207.

  • Fountain, Henry. “Panel Urges Research on Geoengineering as a Tool Against Climate Change.” The New York Times. 2015. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/11/science/panel-urges-more- research-on-geoengineering-as-a-tool-against-climate-change. html?mcubz=3.

  • 22

    control,117* pollution control, flood management, and agricultural changes.118

    The last area of concern regarding weather threats cen- ters around attribution. The United States defends itself daily from activities of rival nations that fall below the lev- el of war but can still negatively target national security. Nations who feel they cannot compete with the United States directly use these methods to level the playing field. As an example, a 2015 DoD Cybersecurity Culture and Compliance Initiative states that the DoD had been the subject of over 30 million malicious attacks to its network in just the short period from September, 2014 to June, 2015.119 Targeted attacks by hackers or comput- er viruses can leverage naturally occurring events like space weather to disguise their intrusion into U.S. net- works as they create effects that mimic space weather threats. By using space weather events or manufactur- ing events that mimic space weather, adversaries can create a non-attributional attack on vital systems with little concern of detection until it is too late to react.

    One such possible event made international news in the Spring of 2016. Swedish air traffic controllers reported widespread and persistent outages of their aviation ra- dar network over the course of five days in November of 2015. Publicly attributed to a solar event, domestic and international flight operations halted while repair ef- forts searched for the cause of the outage. Anonymous sources pointed towards a more ominous culprit than space weather as further reporting claimed Swedish authorities traced the beginning of the outage to an advanced persistent threat group previously linked to the Russian military intelligence agency, Spetsnaz GRU. The Swedish Civil Aviation Administration later came

      • See Appendix: Weather Control.
    1. “Technologies for adaptation to climate change.” United Na- tions Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2006: 13. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/publications/tech_for_adapta- tion_06.pdf.
  • “Department of Defense Cybersecurity Culture and Compli- ance Initiative.” Office of the Secretary of Defense. 2015. https:// dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/OSD011517-15-RES- Final.pdf.

  • back with another announcement that this was a nat- urally occurring event and no cause for alarm. Howev- er, rumors persist that the events engineered over the course of a week had little or nothing to do with a space weather event, but more to do with the Russians testing

    out their electronic warfare capability.

    series of geomagnetic storms did occur during this pe- riod does create some doubt as to the validity of the rumors, however, that does not preclude the capability exists. That only Sweden’s radar network felt the effects of the storm lends credence to other explanations.

    While all countries claim a purely scientific interest and capability for experimenting with the natural environ- ment, a prudent strategic leader should look to the du- al-use possibilities of such labors and seek mitigation strategies.

    Challenge 3: The Army and DoD – Organi- zational Confusion and Lack of Account- ability for Climate Change

    No systemic understanding of the wide diversity of climate-change related intelligence.

    The section above on the environmental effects of cli- mate change demonstrates the wide variety of stake- holders who are monitoring climate change-related ef- fects. These include public health organizations such and the W.H.O. and the Centers for Disease Control, energy producers and regulators such as the Feder- al Energy Regulatory Commission, weather observers such as NASA and the NOAA, humanitarian organiza- tions like the World Food Program, national security entities like the U.S. military, and numerous private and public organizations like universities, NGOs, and so on. Climate change is at the center of a complex web of interactions. During this study, we were struck by how much many people knew about parts of the phenome-

    1. Russon, Mary-Ann. “Russia Blamed for Crashing Swedish Air Traffic Control to Test Electronic Warfare Capabilities.” Inter- national Business Times. 2016. http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/rus- sia-blamed-bringing-down-swedish-air-traffic-control-test-electron- ic-warfare-capabilities-1554895.


    The fact that a


    na, but we were also surprised by the lack of a holistic view of the problem, and a sense of how some areas would relate to each other. Climate change is a com- mon cause linking a disparate set of challenges, but we currently have no systemic view to assess and manage risk. In contrast, in China, systems science and engi- neering is considered so important to the future of Chi- na that this is a course of study required for all cadres in the Chinese Communist Party’s Central Party School in Beijing.121 Thanks in part to some spectacular historical failures and collaboration with the University of Hull, the hard systems approaches have been amended to sys- tematically take into account wuli (objective exploration of a problem, facts, futures), shili (mathematical and conceptual models used to organize a system), and renli (human relationships). The application of these ap- proaches at large scale, coupled with intensive urban surveillance, state-influenced social media, and biomet- ric fintech, have the potential to create very significant asymmetries in resilience between the U.S. and China to climate-induced effects and any other type of attack or disaster.

    In the U.S., there are many actions that would be war- ranted by recent past experience to reduce vulnerabil- ities of the Army, the DoD and the nation such that the DoD is mobilized under a State of Emergency. No single approach is likely to be adequate to prepare the U.S. Army and the DoD as a whole for altered conditions that are either in place already or virtually certain to occur at some point in the future. In the past two decades, the DoD has been under increasing pressure from Congress to prepare strategies, plans and capabilities necessary to ensure preparedness for the wide array of potential impacts on weather resulting from climate change. The NDAA for 2018 mandated at least two studies to this effect, one focused on climate per se, and one focused on DoD vulnerabilities to disruption of

    1. Hvistendahl, Mara. “A revered rocket scientist set in motion China’s mass surveillance of its citizens.” Science 359(6381): 1206-1209. 2018. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/03/re- vered-rocket-scientist-set-motion-china-s-mass-surveillance-its-cit- izens.

    the global food system. While there have been signifi- cant interagency investment and collaboration through the past two decades, there is an ongoing need for im- proved interagency collaboration between intelligence, defense, and civilian agencies on climate change data collection, analysis, and forecasting. Where not already routine, the intelligence community’s analyses would be improved by the systematic inclusion, as a matter of course, of closely synched present day and near-term insights from climate projections, modeling, and weath- er data into established products and processes. DoD and natural science agencies would benefit from the additional qualitative and quantitative collection, provid- ed by IC platforms, to improve their own processes and products.

    The lack of organizational accountability in the DoD and the Army

    They say that “what gets measured, gets done.” In large, complex, bureaucracies, getting “new” things done often involves adding structure. Especially in long-es- tablished organizations, the addition of new structures can engender distress by way of competition for fixed resources and local or general cultural opposition, this can create circumstances where new structures be- come disconnected from the normal socialization, in- tegration and resourcing processes. Such challenges can arise no matter how justified or important the “new” effort is. In many cases, new administrative structures, staffing and infrastructure are required. Under any cir- cumstances, “best laid plans,” can become hard to implement across the organization. Climate change presents the Army with a bureaucratically “new” and complex challenge that must be socialized, integrated, and resourced across the enterprise. Climate change is a national security imperative that cuts across the department and has no single organization wholly re- sponsible for addressing it. But the Army and its sister Services are not alone in wondering how to address cli- mate change. Congress’ oversight authority enables it to query the Department of Defense (DOD) about its plans to address the impact of climate change. The 2018 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), di-


    rected the DOD to provide a report on the vulnerabilities to installations and combatant command requirements resulting from climate change over the next 20 years.122 The report is required to list of the ten most vulnerable installations, mitigation and cost strategy, and frequen- cy of humanitarian assistance/disaster relief (HADR) missions.123 The Army will task within its organizations for the answer, but short of the occasional request from Congress, is there any organization within the Army that periodically assesses how it is doing across the enter- prise? Who is deciding what trades to make, where to invest, what to invest in, or what the Army’s priorities should be? The Army is making efforts toward address- ing climate change, but who or what body is defining those priorities?

    From an organizational structure, the Army does not have a good mechanism for holistically assessing and re-assessing the present and future impacts of climate change on the Army, nor is there a systematic mech- anism in place to track present and past impacts on the force. Any new organizing construct within the Army to address the very diverse impacts of climate change across scales and geographies should reflect the Army leadership’s objectives. It should provide vis- ibility across the enterprise about what the Army is do- ing, and the level of readiness or preparedness being resourced. And it should also provide leadership with an understanding of how climate change has and will impact areas such as training, readiness, supply chain, and its future cost implications.

    The Environmentally Oblivious Culture of the Army

    The Army has thrived despite a culture of environmental oblivion that exists within the force. Conditions may no longer favor this tendency. Trends show that the Unit- ed States is becoming more environmentally conscious and that the threat of climate change and our impact on the planet is seen as a threat to our national security by a majority of the population.124

    The Army is not an environmentally friendly organiza- tion. Frankly, it is not designed to be. For good rea- sons, the Army focuses on the most effective means to dominate an enemy on the battlefield. However, in the course of this endeavor, the turbine engines that pow- er helicopters and tanks burn thousands of pounds of JP-8 fuel per hour. Every time one of those turbine en- gines is shut off almost a pint of jet fuel is dumped over- board onto the ground. The munitions used in training rain lead and explosive residue into range complexes across the country. Armored vehicles churn up the soil in maneuver areas and contribute to erosion and sed- iment run off into streams. In myriad offices across the force, thousands of pages of PowerPoint presentations are printed off every day, simply to be thrown away af- ter the briefing. In short, the Army is an environmental disaster. Incidentally, this makes the Army a likely target of social mobilization (see above).

    Given the magnitude and variety of climate change-re- lated challenges, what specific actions can be under- taken by leaders of the U.S. Army today? We now turn to this question.

    1. “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018.” 115th Congress of the United States of America. 2017:169. https:// http://www.congress.gov/115/bills/hr2810/BILLS-115hr2810enr.pdf.
  • “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018.” 115th Congress of the United States of America. 2017: 169-170. https://www.congress.gov/115/bills/hr2810/BILLS-115hr2810enr. pdf.

  • Saad, Lydia. Gallup, “Global Warming Concern at Three-De- cade High in U.S.” Gallup News. 2017. https://news.gallup.com/ poll/206030/global-warming-concern-three-decade-high.aspx.

  • 25

    Part 2: Recommendations

    This section describes recommendations for climate change-related actions by the U.S. Army. We summa- rize each recommendation in terms of timing of imple- mentation (Now, 1-5 years, 6-10 years, or beyond 10 years), and we characterize the resourcing require- ments associated with it. “Low” resourcing assumes no substantive additional resources are required to imple- ment the recommendation. “Moderate” resourcing as- sumes that some reprogramming is needed, up to $100 million over a five-year period. “High” means that the recommendation requires substantive appropriations, in excess of $100 million over a five-year period. All re- source projections are estimates.

    Hydration in a Contested Arid Environment

    The U.S. Army is precipitously close to mission failure concerning hydration of the force in a contested arid environment. The experience and best practices of the last 17 years of conflict in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Africa rely heavily on logistics force structures to sup- port the warfighter with water mostly procured through contracted means of bottled water, local wells and Re- verse Osmosis Water Purification Units (ROWPU). The Army must reinvest aggressively in technologies both in-house and commercial off the shelf in the next 5-10 years to keep pace with rising global temperatures, es- pecially those arid areas in or poised for conflict. The Army must seek partnerships with industry, other na- tions, and other militaries currently working on the hy- dration issue.

    The Army must re-examine its planning approach to the hydration issue. The table below comes from the Command and General Staff College Student Text, The- ater Sustainment Battle book. The ability to supply this amount of water in the most demanding environment is costly in money, personnel, infrastructure, and force structure.125 (See Table 2.) The calculations for water (8.34 pounds per gallon) in an arid environment equates to 66 pounds of water per soldier.


    Problem: Hydration Challenges in a Contested Environment

    Recommendation: The Army must develop ad- vanced technologies to capture ambient hu- midity and transition technology from the United States Army Research, Development, and Engi- neering Command (RDECOM) that supports the water sustainment tenants of decentralizing and embedded, harvest water, and recycle and re- use.

    Implementation Timing: 6-10 Years Resource Requirement: Moderate


    1. Johnson, Michael, CPT and LTC Brent Coryell. “Logistics Forecasting and Estimates in the Brigade Combat Team.” 2016. Army Sustainment. http://www.alu.army.mil/alog/2016/NOVDEC16/ PDF/176881.pdf.

    Table 2: Daily water consumption factors in gallons per person126

    bility Needs Assessment Process. The objective is to develop technologies enabling a logistics transforma- tion in the area of water sustainment by reducing the water distribution and storage load. Without technol- ogy advances, water remains 30%-40% of the force sustainment requirement. The reduction encompasses the water storage load on combat platforms, the Sol- dier, tactical systems, and current and future force wa- ter distribution requirements. The Army must develop advanced technologies to capture ambient humidity and transition technology from the United States Army Research, Development, and Engineering Command (RDECOM) that supports the water sustainment ten- ants of decentralizing and embedded, harvest water, and recycle and reuse. This technology enables wa- ter production capability to be embedded in platforms (possibility trailer mounted systems) creating distribut- ed water production that reduces resupply and storage requirements and supports a self-sustainment concept of 3 to 7 days without resupply. The objective is achiev- ing 7 gallons of water produced for every one gallon of fuel used.127

    The U.S. army must take aggressive steps to manage the risk of emerging technologies. As with any emerging technology, there is a risk. There is a risk in the level of investment of both finances and resources. The amount of time given to the research versus the payoff. The haz- ard of hydration is identified and through investment, research and development, and partnerships, controls can be emplaced to mitigate, monitor, and ultimately re- duce the risk.

    The Department of the Army must seek partnerships with foreign regional militaries and organizations who have proven the ability to operate in an arid environ- ment and leverage these techniques and apply them to U.S. military operations. Investments already by the Marine Corps in 2012 proved their worth. The Individual Water Purification System Block II allowed Marines to

    1. Burden, Jr., Charles E. Team Leader for Petroleum, Water and Material Handling Equipment, Combined Arms Support Com- mand. Telephone interview by author, April 10, 2018.


    Temper- ate




    Drinking 1.5 water

    Personal 1.7 hygiene

    Field feed- 2.8 ing

    Heat injury .1 treatment

    3.0 3.0 2.0

    1.7 1.7


    2.8 2.8 2.8

    .2 .2 .1

    Vehicle mainte- nance


    Standard planning factor





    Current planning methodologies remain heavily vested in bottled water meaning a more considerable force is needed to transport it. As of the 2017 Modified Tables of Occupation and Equipment (MTOE), most units retain some level of water storage or transportation based on force structure. This structure makes sense and requires continuation. This structure only works through the sup- plying of potable water by support units or through lo- cally procured methods. Force structure will not fix this problem. Very few Army units have water generation ca- pabilities, and as of 2015, Brigade Combat Teams can no longer organically support their water needs. The additional units needed to support them creates an un- supportable logistical footprint and reduces the speed of the combat units.

    Researchers at Ft. Lee, VA, with the Combined Arms Support Command (CASCOM), in the Petroleum and Water Department, believe water generation is one of the leading fields for material approaches in the Capa-

    1. Ibid.


    self-purify water directly from the source. This system reduces weight and logistics supporting an ever-grow- ing expeditionary force.128 In the 2000s in Iraq, over 864,000 bottles of water were consumed each month at one Forward Operating Base (FOB) with that number doubling during hotter months.129 Reducing the depen- dence on bottled water dramatically reduces the num- ber of logistics formations freeing up that force structure for deliberate operations. Further reducing the cost of water was the Army’s expenditures in the past for the Lightweight Water Purifier Units. This system developed in early 2002 by MECO Defense cut the price of a gallon of water from $5.00 to $.07.130

    The Army must look at commercial, off-the-shelf (COTS) technologies to create a more self-sufficient warfighter. One of the most recent developments is in the area of at- mospheric water gathering. Some researchers estimate there may be as much as 13 trillion liters of water in the air. Previous techniques have proven costly to operate regarding fuel. There is a newer device called a water harvester. Using metal-organic frameworks (MOF), sci- entists are creating a reaction to force water vapor in the air to condense producing 3 liters of water for every liter

    Figure 6: Illustration of a micro water collector132

    Ironically, Dr. Jay Dusenberry and his team at the U.S. Army Tank Automotive Research Development & Engi- neering Center (TARDEC), as early as 2003, worked on similar technology.133 His opinion is an approach which focuses on multiple technologies such as small unit purifiers, desalinization, and reverse osmosis to sup- plement an atmospheric water gatherer. This is another capability that allows units to produce their own water. This paired with the water harvesting or mounted on a robot may provide complementary capabilities that would support sustainment for units over a wide range of operational scenarios and environmental conditions. He stresses the goal must be to produce as much water as possible at the point of need.

    The U.S. Army continues to make great strides on ways to reduce its dependency on this time-proven supply

    1. Ibid.
  • Dusenbury, Jay. “Water Treatment and Harvesting Systems.” US Army TARDEC/DARPA. 2003. http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/ u2/a461465.pdf.

  • of material used.


    (See Figure 6.)

    1. Browne, Mathuel. “Marines Invest in New System to Pu- rify Water on the Go.” Armed with Science: The Official US De- fense Department Science Blog. 2017. http://science.dodlive. mil/2017/02/01/marines-invest-in-new-system-to-purify-water-on- the-go/.
  • Vitter, Scott and Corey James. “In a Position to Lead: How Military Technology and Innovation Can Ease the World’s Water Challenges.” Earth Magazine. 2017. https://www.earthmagazine. org/article/position-lead-how-military-technology-and-innova- tion-can-ease-worlds-water-challenges.

  • Klie, John and Stephen Rome. “US Army Reduces Water Costs with Mobile Purifier Units.” Water and Waste International. 2005. http://www.waterworld.com/articles/wwi/print/volume-20/ issue-10/features/us-army-reduces-water-costs-with-mobile-purifi- er-units.html.

  • Service, Robert F. “This new solar-powered device can pull water straight from the desert air.” Science. 2017. http://www. sciencemag.org/news/2017/04/new-solar-powered-device-can- pull-water-straight-desert-air.

  • 28

    process, but current funding priorities potentially will de- rail this effort in the areas of research and development. The technologies are appearing in the private sector which requires assimilation into the military formations. Force structure alone will not solve this problem. Sol- diers operating in contested arid environments with re- duced water sources need the ability to collect water from the atmosphere. Local procurement of water may not be safe or accessible due to conflict. The technolo- gy research being recommended could reduce conflict if placed in these water-challenged areas reducing or eliminating the need for U.S. military presence. The is- sue may well be served by the Cross Functional Teams (CFTs) model to address this dilemma aggressively.

    on research, development and fielding of vehicles and equipment that have a decreased environmental impact and are able to transit the Arctic terrain effectively.

    In terms of resource allocation requirements for the force, implementation for expansion of Arctic capabil- ities and capacity is a low to moderate priority in the near to mid-term. This priority increases to high from the mid to long term horizon. Correspondingly, the resourc- es required for implementation of these recommenda- tions also increase over time. Increased training and doctrine development are simply a reprioritization of existing resources, focused on burgeoning capabilities. In the mid-term, materiel solutions and augmentation of navigation capabilities for the Arctic are moderately resource intensive. Finally, the research, development and fielding of low environmental impact equipment with enhanced Arctic capabilities is very resource inten- sive and will require compromises and a realization of the increased importance of Arctic security.

    The Arctic remains at the forefront of the earth’s climate adaptation and variances in the global climate are most noticeable in the Arctic region. Increased accessibility to the region for economic activity will consequently increase the security requirements and competition in the region. Currently Russia is rapidly expanding their Arctic military capabilities and capacity.134 The U.S. mili- tary must immediately begin expanding its capability to operate in the Artic to defend economic interests and to partner with allies across the region.

    The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s 2014 report illustrating the Representative Concentra- tion Pathway (RCP) 4.5 model shows the Arctic Region anomalous temperature change through 2050 from +3 up to +6 degrees Celsius, more than any other area on the globe.135 This rapid climate change will continue to

    1. Nudelman, Mike and Bender, Jeremy. “This Map Shows Russia’s Dominant Militarization of the Arctic.” Business Insider. 2015. http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-russias-militariza- tion-of-arctic-2015-8.
  • “Fifth Assessment Report – Synthesis Report.” Intergovern- mental Panel on Climate Change. 2015. http://ipcc.ch/report/ar5/

  • Problem: Lack of adequate preparation and coherence in doctrine, training, and capabil- ities development to support effective Arctic operations.

    Recommendation: The Army and the Depart- ment of Defense must begin planning and im- plementing changes to training, equipment, doctrine and capabilities in anticipation of an ex- panded role in the Arctic associated with global climate adaptation.

    Implementation Timing: Now to 10+ Years. Resource Requirements: Moderate to High.

    Beginning immediately, the Army should implement Arctic training for a greater number of units to increase potential Arctic force capacity. In addition, the Army must focus on immediate doctrine development that will facilitate operations in remote and extreme environ- ments. In the mid-term, over the five to ten-year span, the Army should focus on materiel solutions to operat- ing in environmental extremes, coupled with execution of more environmentally friendly training practices. To enhance operational effectiveness, DoD must increase GPS satellite distribution to augment Arctic coverage and provide enhanced navigation capabilities through the establishment of eLORAN throughout U.S. and allied Arctic regions. Finally, long term focus must be placed


    result in increased shipping transiting the Arctic,136 pop- ulation shifts to the region and increased competition to extract the vast hydrocarbon resources more readily available as the ice sheets contract.137 These changes will drive an expansion of security efforts from nations across the region as they vie to claim and protect the economic resources of the region.

    In this role, the Army must be trained and equipped to operate across vast distances in extremely remote and inhospitable terrain. Choosing not to prioritize resources to this effort puts the Army at substantial risk. Simply put, the competition for resources in the Arctic will increase security requirements and the potential for conflict. The Army will not be excluded from those requirements or any conflict that develops. The Army will simply be un- prepared for the mission and the environment in which it will occur. This results in a significantly increased risk to mission as well as to personnel and equipment. Further risk is entailed with respect to service competition for re- sources. As Russian activity expands in the Arctic, both the Navy and the Air Force will compete for resources to meet the Russian threat. The Army must compete as well, not only to simply gain resources, but, moreover, to be ready to contribute as a member of the joint force.

    There are three primary timelines associated with these recommendations: near term (immediate to 5 years), mid-term (5-10 years) and long term (beyond 10 years). Generally speaking, the investment associated with im- plementing the recommendation corresponds with the timeline, with more immediate recommendations being less cost intensive than longer term ones.

    The first near term recommendation is to simply in- crease the number of soldiers and units exposed to


    1. Amos, Jonathan. “Arctic Ocean Shipping Routes ‘to Open for Months’.” BBC News. 2016. http://www.bbc.com/news/science-en- vironment-37286750.
  • Keil, Katherine. “The Role of Arctic Hydrocarbons for Future Energy Security.” Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainabil-

  • ity. 2014. https://nautilus.org/napsnet/napsnet-special-reports/ the-role-of-arctic-hydrocarbons-for-future-energy-security/.

    training in the Arctic environment. The extreme climate and remoteness of the region requires specialized training that is currently available to only a small num- ber of Army soldiers. This expansion in training must be accompanied by development of doctrine that ad- dresses how brigades will fight in remote environments. In a wide area security mission in the Arctic’s vast ex- panse, a brigade will be expected to defend a much wider area, forcing battalions to operate in a more au- tonomous mode, removed from bases of supply and centralized command nodes. Expanding area coverage requirements will drive the development of advanced persistent sensors, both air and ground based, that can operate in extreme climactic environments to enable the brigades and battalions to detect enemies and maneu- ver to counter potential attacks.

    These near-term recommendations do not require a great deal of immediate investment. Primarily, the Army would need to reprioritize training funding to expand throughput and attendance at Arctic training areas. Additional investment would be required for sensor development, but the current capabilities both in the inventory and in commercial applications are not far removed from those the Army will require to meet near- term needs.

    The mid-term recommendations will require close co- ordination between the Army and other elements of the DoD. The first series of recommendations concerns materials engineering solutions to problems associated with current equipment in cold weather environments. For example, the current rotary wing fleet has many re- strictions on cold weather operations concerning bat- tery usage and life as well as requirements for auxiliary power unit (APU) operations and fragility of elastomeric bearings in the tail rotor sections. These restrictions are easily mitigated when conducting operations from con- trolled environment hangars but will severely hamper maneuver operations from austere locations.

    Next, in conjunction with the other services, the Army must expand search and rescue capabilities in the Arc- tic. An increase in population, economic activity and


    unit training will increase requirements for search and rescue assets. Recently the Army has abdicated prima- ry search and rescue responsibilities to the Air Force, as the proponent for combat search and rescue. Howev- er, the Army should expand capabilities and training to minimize response time for contingencies.

    Additionally, in conjunction with the DoD and other ser- vices, the Army must invest in expanding Arctic naviga- tion capabilities. Lack of GPS differential, ionospheric storms and low angle satellite intervisibility combine to reduce the effectiveness of GPS at high latitudes.138 The DoD can mitigate this risk through augmentation of the GPS satellite fleet that will enable greater GPS differen- tial to increase geolocation accuracy. Furthermore, es- tablishment of eLORAN land-based navigation facilities to augment satellite aided navigation will ensure both accuracy and redundancy for operation in remote Arctic areas. Consideration should also be given to the limita- tions of satellite aided communications in the Arctic as any geosynchronous platform will experience the same limitations as the GPS satellites.

    Finally, in the mid-term the Army must focus on reduc- ing the environmental impact of training. The Arctic will remain a delicate environment that the public looks to as “unspoiled” wilderness. Operations that damage or degrade the environment will foster a negative view of the Army and must be mitigated through careful training execution that minimizes the risk of petroleum spills and localizes training impacts to the smallest area possible. There are further recommendations associated with this challenge for long term consideration.

    Taken together, these mid-term recommendations will require moderate investment to bring to fruition. Mate- rial solutions to cold weather operating challenges are available for many of the Army’s current platforms, how- ever those materials will need extensive testing to incor-

    1. “Polar Regions.” The Swedish Club: International Marine In- surance. Accessed April 16, 2018. https://www.swedishclub.com/ loss-prevention/trading-area/polar-regions/.

    porate into those platforms. Additionally, it is critical that those material solutions be viable across the spectrum of operational conditions as it is not realistic, for exam- ple, to install different batteries, APUs and bearings for different environments across the rotary wing fleet. Expanded search and rescue capabilities and capac- ity will require investment in both equipment and train- ing. However, the equipment required is available either within other services or is currently in use in commercial applications. The most cost intensive of the mid-term recommendations is augmentation to navigation and communication capabilities. However, these costs can be somewhat mitigated through normal satellite attri- tion and replacement with upgraded capabilities. Ad- ditionally, low earth orbit (LEO) satellite options can be employed that simply augment coverage in the Arctic region. LEO satellites are less expensive to deploy and limited capabilities for a limited coverage area may de- crease per unit costs.

    The final recommendation considers long-term solu- tions to the challenge of increased operations in the Arctic. As previously discussed, the austere and remote nature of the Arctic, as well as the vast area under con- sideration will require units to operate in a much larger area than current doctrine dictates. This will significantly stress the Army’s logistics capability to support those units in an environment with little transportation infra- structure. To mitigate this, the Army must invest in plat- forms that are far more fuel efficient or that operate off of alternative energy sources. A diminishing reliance on hy- drocarbon-based fuels will not only decrease logistical requirements but will also decrease the environmental impact of operations in the Arctic. These developments can put the Army at the forefront of environmental stew- ardship and ensure that the public remains firmly rooted behind the Army’s efforts.

    In conjunction with development of new fuel sources, the Army must explore vehicles more well-suited to Arctic maneuver. Thawing of the permafrost will create large expanses of bogs and marshes across many ar- eas of the Arctic. In addition, though the globe is warm- ing, extreme weather conditions will persist in the Arctic.


    The Army needs to focus on the development of an in- fantry carrier vehicle with low surface pressure to maxi- mize maneuverability in adverse terrain. An amphibious capable vehicle that has high weight distribution char- acteristics across the drive (either wheeled or tracked) contact patches will increase the speed of maneuver necessary for units to conduct wide area security across greater coverage areas.

    These long-term recommendations will require signifi- cant investment to come to fruition. Research and de- velopment of new fuels and a new class of vehicles is a long lead time requirement that the Army must begin investing in now. However, the research into new fuels or energy sources can be shared across the services and is already underway in many cases. Commercial companies are also well invested in these capabilities already. Public demand is driving innovation in this field and will help mitigate costs for the Army in development and fielding.

    that awards the unit that brings in the most waste to

    the recycling facility. This program, however, is a great

    example of one of the obstacles to environmental con-

    sciousness in the Army. In order for a unit to receive an

    annual award that may amount to $500 deposited into

    the unit’s Morale, Welfare and Recreation (MWR) fund,

    every soldier in the unit must make the individual effort

    to identify those items eligible for recycling, separate

    their trash and then dispose of that trash in a special

    receptacle. The unit must then transport that refuse to

    the post recycling facility for credit. This is a classic ex-

    ample of concentrated costs with dispersed benefits,

    as demonstrated in Mancur Olson’s Logic of Collective


    tion, but not to the individual and therefore the individual does not see the direct benefits of his efforts to recycle. Whatever events may be sponsored from the MWR fund would likely occur anyway. The only benefit of the re- cycling award is that potentially the soldier may get an extra hamburger at the MWR picnic. This is not much of an incentive. Creating and promulgating a culture of environmental stewardship throughout an organization as vast and diverse as the Army will take years, and the tide of public opinion shows no signs of slowing.

    The Army’s norms and values must change.141 The Army does not have a set of norms that promotes environ- mental stewardship or leadership where it is in the best interest of the force. To create these, the underlying as- sumptions that focus simply on the ends must change to consider the ways. Edgar Schein maintains that those assumptions are based on deeper dimensions such as

    1. Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and Theory of Groups, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971. Olson argued that in a large, or what he called latent, organization, rewards and punishment used to incentivize a greater good must be administered at the private level to incur direct costs or consequences associated with a given behavior.
  • Congleton, Roger D. “The Logic of Collective Action and be- yond.” Public Choice Online 164, no 3-4: 219. 2015. https://search- proquest-com.usawc.idm.oclc.org/docview/1727606018?pq-orig- site=summon.

  • Gerras, Stephan J., Leonard Wong and Charles D. Allen. “Organizational Culture: Applying a Hybrid Model to the U.S. Army.” US Army War College. 2008: 6.

  • The Army has attempted some small-scale efforts at environmental stewardship. At installations across the country there are areas that are off limits to training because some endangered species is resident there. In nearly every office there is a blue recyclables trash can and most installations have a recycle program


    The reward is distributed to the organiza-


    Problem: The Lack of a Culture of Environmen- tal Stewardship

    Recommendation: Army leadership must create a culture of environmental consciousness, stay ahead of societal demands for environmental stewardship and serve as a leader for the na- tion or it risks endangering the broad support it now enjoys. Cultural change is a senior leader responsibility.

    Implementation Timing: Now Resource Requirements: Low


    reality, truth and human activity.142 These are the same challenges echoed in climate change debates today.

    The youth of the military is a powerful potential source of cultural change. If the younger population as a whole is more environmentally conscious in the United States, it stands to reason that the younger members of the military will be as well. However, the military as a highly hierarchical organization is resistant to the adoption of innovative input from lower ranking and younger indi- viduals.

    Army leaders can achieve the necessary cultural change through what Schein calls embedding and reinforcing mechanisms. “Embedding mechanisms emplace the assumptions into an organization,” while “reinforcing mechanisms…support the embedded assumptions.”143 Schein’s first embedding mechanism are those things that leaders pay attention to or measure on a regular basis. If Army leaders, for example, rewarded units with the lowest per soldier energy consumption in the bar- racks, that may create lower energy consumption. To use another embedding mechanism in this example, if the reward was a day room in the barracks outfitted with the latest Xbox or PlayStation, a UHD 70” OLED TV and the fastest Wi-Fi, the soldiers would see the benefit of reduced individual electricity consumption through a reward that they can individually appreciate. Finally, perhaps the most effective embedding mechanism is for Army leaders to put their money where their mouth is. How the Army chooses to allocate future resources will communicate to the soldiers where the real focus lies. Significant increases in the budget for simulations as well as R&D for alternative fuels and energy efficient platforms will help anchor the organizational changes into the long-term culture of the Army.

    To support these embedding mechanisms, Schein sug- gests aligned reinforcing mechanisms, without which “cultural change is much more difficult, if not impossi-

    1. Ibid
  • Gerras, Wong, and Allen, 17.

  • ble”.144 The first of these is a change to organizational design or structure necessary to support the cultural change. An example of this might be to decrease fu- ture investments in logistical support capacity to match decreased support requirements achieved through in- creased fuel efficiency. These investments could then be redirected into developing additional combat capac- ity or capability.

    Another important mechanism is the design of physi- cal spaces and buildings. A focus on energy efficient design and renewable energy sources will reinforce a sense of conservation and efficiency. Couple this tac- tic with formal statements of mission and organization- al philosophy that include references to environmen- tal stewardship posted on the ubiquitous unit bulletin boards will support the foundational assumptions put in place by the embedding mechanisms.

    The Army is at a crossroads. The current administra- tion may have backed out of the Paris Accords, but the majority of the American people believe that climate change is a threat. Steps taken now can put the Army on a path to lead the nation in preparedness and envi- ronmental awareness. At the same time, the Army may come to recognize environmental awareness, not as an add-on, but as a core strategy to ensure the force is leveraging all insights possible for war-fighting and U.S. preparedness. Alternatively, the Army can continue its present trajectories, ignoring the myriad existing and potential threats that result from climate change and environmental concerns more broadly, including alien- ation of youth, allies and voters on whose largesse it depends, hurtling through the night in the belief that it is as unsinkable as the Titanic.


    1. Gerras, Wong, and Allen, 19.

    Problem: Potential disruptions to readiness due to restrictions on fuel use.

    Recommendation: The Army must significantly increase investment in more realistic simulation that incorporates the advances in virtual and augmented reality. It should also continue to in- vest in the development of lower CO2 emissions platforms and systems.

    Implementation Timing: 6-10 years (VR/AR), 10+ years (alternate energy platforms).

    Resource Requirements: Moderate to High.

    The Army must significantly increase investment in more

    realistic simulation that incorporates the advances in

    virtual reality. The current resistance to greater simula-

    tion in training is primarily based on a lack of simulation


    cate the sights, sounds, smells and feel of weapons, platforms and situations is developing rapidly. The Army is at risk of being left behind.

    This change will impact nearly every facet of Army op- erations today. Nothing is likely to fully replace field training in the foreseeable future. However, the Army must invest now in developing future capabilities. The required investments cross the entire range of activities, from administration to training to combat.

    Currently Army investment in virtual training is primarily based on the Virtual Battle Space (VBS) simulation plat- form that most of industry has already abandoned in favor of the Unity platform, “the engine of choice among virtual reality developers”.146 The Army is not investing enough in simulations to be agile and change with the industry, or to command industry trends. The 2018 Na-

    1. “Going Virtual to Prepare for a New Era of Defense.” Govern- ment Business Council. 2014. http://cdn.govexec.com/media/gbc/ docs/gbc_rc_going_virtual_final.pdf.
  • Tucker, Patrick. “Better Simulation Could Save the Military Millions.” Defense One Online. 2015. http://www.defenseone.com/ technology/2015/01/better-simulation-could-save-military-mil- lions/104172/.

  • tional Defense Authorization Act authorizes nearly $700 billion in military spending for the year, yet industry ex- pects the entire U.S. military to invest only $48.9 billion in simulations through 2025.147 Greater simulation in- vestment can create overall budget savings. Depending on the airframe, training in flight simulators costs only 5-20% the cost of operating the actual platform.148 Be- yond the environmental impact, increased investment in simulations can result in decreased training costs, lon- ger life for the actual platforms, an increased opportu- nity for training repetitions and improvements in acqui- sition through better environments for prototyping and new platform integration.

    Finally, the Army’s primary platforms, its weapons sys- tems and the vehicles, are not designed for energy and fuel efficiency or to minimize the impact to the environ- ment. Alternative fuel research and new technologies that limit emissions and increase fuel efficiency are ex- pensive. The slow pace of military acquisition ensures that development and integration of these technologies into future platforms will be laborious and incremental. However, if current requirement documents do not re- flect an organizational drive to change the environmen- tal footprint of future systems, the Army will remain de- cades behind the public demands.


    However, the technology to perfectly repli-

    1. “Military Simulation and Virtual Training Market: $15.8B Worth Global Opportunity by 2025.” Cision PR Newswire Online. 2015. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/military-sim- ulation-and-virtual-training-market-158b-worth-global-opportuni- ty-by-2025-499209471.html.
  • Going Virtual to Prepare for a New Era of Defense.” Govern- ment Business Council. 2014. http://cdn.govexec.com/media/gbc/ docs/gbc_rc_going_virtual_final.pdf.

  • 34


    Problem: Lack of coordination and consolida- tion in climate-change related intelligence.

    Recommendation: Advocate for a comprehen- sive organization, functional manager, technol- ogy, and process review study to identify the current state of intelligence community agencies with regard to climate change, with the goal of formalizing Interagency coordination on Climate Change-related intelligence.

    Implementation Timing: Now Resourcing Requirements: Low

    To support and improve interagency collaboration in the Intelligence Community (IC), the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) should initially assign an office and/or National Intelligence Manager (NIM) with the requisite authority and budget to coordinate and champion climate change endeavors within the IC and greater interagency. This office and/or NIM should man- age a comprehensive organization, functional manag- er, technology, and process review study to identify the current state of IC agencies regarding climate change. Following the completion of the review, an IC-wide Cli- mate Change strategy should be developed.149

    The IC should dedicate collection, targeting, and anal- ysis resources into monitoring global geo-engineering technologies and state-programs. This area of technol- ogy focus and growth is expected to continue globally; this topic, therefore, should be added to the National Intelligence Priorities Framework (NIPF). 150

    1. “Functional Managers.” Office of the Director of National Intel- ligence: Intelligence Community Directive 113. 2009. https://www. dni.gov/files/documents/ICD/ICD_113.pdf.
  • “National Intelligence Priorities Framework.” Office of the Director of National Intelligence: Intelligence Community Directive 204. 2015. https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICD/ICD 204 Na-

  • The IC should partner with allied nations on the collec- tion and analysis of climate-related intelligence. This partnership should be included in existing partner en- gagement programs.

    The National Intelligence Council should lead and en- sure the reoccurring completion of a National Intelli- gence Estimate or akin intelligence assessment for use across the United States and partner governments, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), industry, and academic institutions. The Defense Intelligence Agen- cy – in coordination with the Department of Defense – should lead and ensure the reoccurring completion of a Defense Intelligence Assessment on climate change drivers that are expected to affect the security environ- ment globally. Both assessments should identify threats and opportunities for the National Security apparatus.

    DoD Combatant Command theater and operational plans could be improved by including climate and re- lated systems which affect the security environment into existing processes like, Joint Intelligence Preparation of the Environment (JIPOE), Infectious Disease Risk As- sessments, and Country Cooperation Plans.151 Inclu- sion of climate change data into existing and comple- mentary intelligence planning processes would improve the Joint Planning Process and meet DoD’s statutory requirements.

    Initial resourcing for IC expansion to include climate change into existing products and processes is expect- ed to be minimal. IC, DoD and natural science agencies are manned to react to burgeoning national security is- sues. Sensor improvement that can better collect on cli- mate change and related driver issues can be included in requirement generation for future programs.

    In terms of a NIM or like office to champion this issue in the IC, the ODNI may need to provide an initial allotment

    tional Intelligence Priorities Framework.pdf.

    1. Defense Intelligence Agency, National Center for Medical Intelligence, “Infectious Disease Risk Assessment Methodology,” in Annex.


    of NIP funds for 2-3 years until programmatic can be determined.

    The National Intelligence Council identified climate change and related drivers of instability were identified as a global trend with implications for the national se- curity environment by 2035.152 The IC and DoD are the responsible government-arms to observe, track, as- sess, and respond to national security threats that are increasingly emanating from climate change drivers.

    While climate change and related drivers are expected to increasing affect and change the global landscape, there is still time. Initial investments in the next 5-10 years will ensure applicable government department and agencies are right fit for the future.

    Secretary of Defense Mattis stated, “I agree that the ef- fects of a changing climate – such as increased mari- time access to the arctic, rising sea levels, desertifica- tion, among others– impact our security situation.“ To respond to these security implications he then indicat- ed, “It is appropriate for the Combatant Commands to incorporate drivers of instability that impact the security environment in their areas into planning.” The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Joseph Dunford, explained military forces may have to be prepositioned globally to respond to natural disasters and other crises that are as a result of climate change. 153

    In June 2016, CIA Director John Brennan spoke at the Council on Foreign Relations, stating, “An Stratospher- ic Aerosol Injection (SAI) program could limit global temperature increases, reducing some risks associat- ed with higher temperatures and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels. The process is also relatively inexpensive—the National

    1. “Global Trends, Paradox of Progress.” National Intelligence Council. 2017: 6. https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/nic/GT-Full- Report.pdf.
  • “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 – Sec. 335.” 115th Congress of the United States of America. 2017. https://www.congress.gov/115/bills/hr2810/BILLS-115hr2810enr. pdf.

  • Research Council estimates that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about $10 billion yearly.” 154

    The last two National Defense Authorization Acts and In- telligence Authorization Act noted climate change, food system security and stability, and other related issues that affect the IC and DoD’s missions. These Congres- sional acts require the IC and DoD to study, analyze, and identify where these emerging areas affect their mission areas and the security environment.

    Problem: Lack of Organizational Account- ability for Climate-Change Related Activities

    Recommendation: Re-commit to the Senior En- ergy and Sustainability Council (SESC). Add a resourcing element to the council by providing the USA and VCSA with funding across each POM cycle to support climate-related projects that improve readiness and resiliency of the force.

    Implementation Timing: Now, 1-10 Years

    Resource Requirements: Low, though potential- ly moderate through reprogramming.

    There are a variety of options for rallying an organization around a mission. For enduring issues, the goal should be to institutionalize the thought. In other words, cre- ate a culture where military and civilians regularly con- sider how their mission could be impacted by climate change. The goal for enduring issues should also be to institutionalize the process, so that the mission does not get disconnected from the normal battle rhythm of a bureaucracy. When a disconnection happens, these missions lose visibility, prioritization, and oftentimes, re- sourcing.

    Climate change will present a challenge to the Army and

    1. “Director Brennan Speaks at the Council on Foreign Re- lations.” Central Intelligence Agency – News and Information. 2016. https://www.cia.gov/news-information/speeches-testi- mony/2016-speeches-testimony/director-brennan-speaks-at-the- council-on-foreign-relations.html.


    the DoD for decades to come. With readiness as the number one priority, mitigating the disruption caused by extreme weather activity should be included amongst the Army’s goals. The Army must be able to train, fight, and win across all domains and in all environments. To do this will take a collective effort to ensure a wide range of missions are able to support the needs of the force.

    Considering the challenges presented by climate change, the Army should re-energize the Senior En- ergy and Sustainability Council (SESC) within the next six to twelve months. This cross-functional council can address complex, ambiguous problems routinely and ensure its recommendations are integrated across the organization. As the proponent for SESC, ASA IE&E already collaborates as-needed across the enterprise. SESC Council of Colonels level meetings are held pe- riodically, but this is not a decision-making forum. A quarterly meeting at the General Officer Steering Com- mittee (GOSC) and a semi-annual meeting with the Un- der Secretary of the Army and Vice Chief of Staff of the Army, will signal the importance of the issue, improve its visibility, and provide direction on prioritization of ef- forts. Policy drives resources, and a senior leader-driv- en council can shape how the Army operates in what will become one of the Army’s future challenges. And for the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Staff of the Army, the SESC will be their center of gravity for “All Things Climate Change.” It will provide them with an organization that will: ensure their priorities are being addressed; oversee what the Army is doing to address climate change; and make strategic decisions about where to invest and take risk.

    The Army should also add a resourcing element to the council by providing the USA and VCSA with funding across each POM cycle to support climate-related projects that improve readiness and resiliency of the force. The SESC could champion innovation by having funds available for organizations to compete to have cli- mate-related projects. With an ability to resource proj- ects, the SESC has the ability to make tangible changes on the ground that affect the force and local communi- ties. Although it is difficult to predict when an extreme

    weather event will occur or how it will affect military op- erations, the Army must leverage the knowledge and resources it has to build resilience across the force. As retired General Martin Dempsey noted, “[w]e need to act based on the information we have, not remain immobile waiting for ‘better options’ to emerge.”155 Se- nior leader involvement will be key in creating a resilient force of the future.

    Problem: Lack of Climate Change-Oriented Campaign Planning and Preparation

    Recommendation: (A) Develop Bangladesh Re- lief Campaign Plan as notional plan for prepar- ing for broader climate change-related require- ments. (B) Work more closely with the CDC to ensure appropriate military support to infectious disease treatment and containment.

    Implementation Timing: Now Resource Requirement: Low

    Bangladesh Crisis Campaign Plan

    Climate change is likely to cause an increase in cata- strophic climatic events. Some of these events, such as tropical cyclones, will have an acute impact on the affected residents of any given region. Others, such as relative sea level rise and increased desertification, will have a more long-lasting effect. Even acute incidents, given an increasing frequency and severity, may have impacts on the population that are more chronic in ef- fect. The result of these events is likely to manifest itself in increased population migration to escape the desta- bilization brought on by climate change.

    The DoD is unlikely to dedicate significant resources to better preparing the force for humanitarian and di- saster response (HADR) missions. However, it should analyze areas where climate change events are likely to exacerbate other political, economic or social issues

    1. Dempsey, Martin and Ori Brafman. Radical Inclusion. USA: Missionday. 2018: 120.


    and where the scale of the potential human migration will tip the balance toward conflict and mass humanitar- ian strife. In other words, those areas where the United States will be compelled to respond. After an analysis to determine those areas at greatest risks, the Army should develop a campaign plan-like approach to mit- igate future risk and to set conditions for a more suc- cessful response, if necessary.

    The U.S. should immediately initiate a campaign plan to mitigate the effects of future crises and set conditions for more effective assistance. We recommend devel- oping a campaign based on the notional scenario of a massive, permanent dislocation of the population of Bangladesh, rated as the planet’s most at risk country from climate change, according to Verisk Maplecroft, a global risk analysis firm.156 Additionally, Germanwatch, funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, rates Bangladesh as already the sixth most impacted country from climate events in the last 20 years.157 Other factors also com- bine to create an even greater probability that the Unit- ed States would intervene if a humanitarian disaster struck Bangladesh.

    As discussed above, nearly 160 million people live in Bangladesh, nearly half of them at sea level.158 Sea level rise and alluvial subsidence has resulted in a relative sea level rise for the delta of approximately 1.5 meters since 1960.159 Both Al-Qaeda and affiliates of ISIS are currently active in Bangladesh.160 In summary, 80 million

    1. “Environmental Risk and Climate Change.” Verisk Maplecroft. 2011. https://www.maplecroft.com/about/news/ccvi.html.
  • Eckstein, David, Vera Kunzel, and Laura Schafer. “Global Climate Risk Index 2018.” Germanwatch: German Federal Min- istry for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2017. https:// germanwatch.org/en/download/20432.pdf.

  • Greenfieldboyce, Nell. “Study: 634 Million People at Risk from Rising Seas.” National Public Radio. 2007. https://www.npr. org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9162438.

  • Schmidt, Charles W. “Delta Subsidence: An Imminent Threat to Coastal Populations.” Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 123: 8. 2015. https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/ehp.123-A204.

  • “The World Factbook: Bangladesh.” US Central Intelligence

  • people fleeing an uninhabitable portion of their coun- try in what is already one of the most densely popu- lated countries on earth will have nowhere to go. Ban- gladesh’s neighbor, India, is a nuclear armed country persistently in conflict with Pakistan and with which the United States is trying to forge stronger ties to counter Chinese regional influence. These factors will drive U.S. involvement in any crisis.

    This approach is not resource intensive but will signifi- cantly reduce mission risk. The military, in conjunction with interagency partners such as the State Department and USAID, should immediately establish liaison teams to work closely with the Bangladeshis to understand their plan to deal with internal migration and the resourc- es they have available. After this analysis the U.S. can offer assistance to strengthen the resilience of govern- ment agencies and provide training for the Bangladeshi military. The Army Corps of Engineers, in conjunction with multi-national partners, can assist the Bangladesh- is in determining what effective steps to take that can slow the effects of relative sea level rise. Through the State Department the U.S. should work with the Indian Government to establish a crisis response team with Bangladesh to help ensure mass migration does not result in conflict. Humanitarian relief supplies should be prepositioned at Diego Garcia to speed the response effort. In addition to interagency efforts, the U.S. should reach out to multi-national partners to determine what kind of coalition can be built to respond to the region, preventing the inefficient and piecemeal collaboration of an ad hoc coalition.

    This is just a short list of the many steps the U.S. can take in an area where future intervention is highly like- ly. Through analysis, the U.S. can determine where, globally, campaign plans should be instituted so that the response efforts are less the execution of a hastily assembled contingency plan and more the sequenced execution of a resourced and ready plan.

    Agency. 2018. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world- factbook/geos/bg.html.


    Infectious Disease Treatment and Containment Support

    The research in this report indicates a greater likelihood for outbreaks of vector borne infectious diseases world- wide, including in the United States. The Intergovern- mental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) research us- ing Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) 4.5 data (the midrange prediction of climate change used throughout this report) predicts areas in the Southeast- ern U.S. will see an increase in precipitation of .5-.8 mm/ day and an increase in average annual temperatures of 1-3 degrees Celsius by 2050.161 This change will likely allow the proliferation of disease vectors (such as mos- quitoes and ticks) over a wider area than they currently inhabit and limit Winter kills of the vectors, resulting in a larger population to spread any diseases. This phe- nomenon is likely to increase the incidence of diseases such as Zika, West Nile Virus, Lyme disease and many others, some of which may be previously unseen in the U.S. As the largest source of potential capacity and ca- pability to respond to widespread disease outbreaks in the United States, the military should be prepared to execute defense support to civil authority (DSCA) mis- sions of this type.

    The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in Atlanta, Geor- gia undoubtedly has robust and detailed plans for wide- spread disease response. The Army, through the DoD, must liaise closely with the CDC and the IC to determine the validity of the plans and the expectations of the mil- itary in assisting in the response. Response to disease outbreaks generally follows two tracks, containment and treatment. From a military standpoint, containment of the disease resembles wide area security operations, and treatment is a robust logistics effort. The Army ex- cels at these tasks.

    To ensure proactive response, the active force, in sup- port of Reserve Component units, should predetermine locations for key logistics nodes throughout the areas

    1. “Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report.” International Panel on Climate Change. 2015. http://ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/.

    most at risk. These nodes will requires APODs, rail links and robust highway systems to speed the deployment of equipment and materials. Appropriate medical facil- ities should be identified capable of providing patient isolation and those areas lacking that capability must be identified. Army assets can fill those capability gaps in more remote areas.

    Climate change is introducing an increased risk of in- fectious disease to the U.S. population. It is increasing- ly not a matter of “if” but of when there will be a large outbreak. The U.S. Army will be called upon to assist in much the same way it was called upon in other disas- ters. Detailed coordination with local, state and federal agencies in the most high risk regions will hasten re- sponse time and minimize risk to mission.


    Problem: Power Grid Vulnerabilities

    Recommendation: A. An inter-agency approach, coupled with collaboration of the commercial sector, should catalogue the liabilities across the electrical grid and prioritize budget requests for infrastructure improvements. B. The DoD should pursue options to reverse infrastructure degra- dation around military installations, including funding internal power generation such as solar/ battery farms and small-nuclear reactors.

    Implementation Timing: Now (A); 6-10, 10+ Years (B)

    Resource Requirement: Low (A); High (B)

    The susceptibilities of the power grid to climate effects should drive the DoD to pursue options to reverse in- frastructure degradation around military installations and ensure that cutting edge strategies for decentral- ized power generation and storage are employed. Con- tracts with utilities, including rural electric cooperatives now thought to be especially vulnerable, should con- tain requirements that mandate tougher cyber security


    protocols to limit damage done by the intensive cyber assaults the grid is currently sustaining, and ideally, to preclude further attack to the US electrical grid. This could reduce exposure to fluctuations in the survivabil- ity of military capability.162 The ability to enable safety protocols like Faraday cages would prevent a massive grid failure in the event of a cascading grid collapse al- lowing for a logical and orderly redistribution of critical power where needed. The development of new options for replacing crucial extra high voltage large power transformers damaged by age and overload will remain essential due to year-long lead times for construction and production of this unique equipment existing out- side the country. Additional infrastructure challenges lie in the lack of heavy lift capacity, bridges, and roadways needed to transport these transformers, given each

    weighing between 200 and 300 tons.

    ment of a domestic production capability for these large transformers or innovative new, lighter technologies for replacing those systems remain a significant barrier to recovery from a widespread power outage. Distributed technologies that are hardened to cyber-attack, such as solar installations, may reduce several major classes of vulnerability simultaneously.

    One option that has met with success stems from the Smart Power Infrastructure Demonstration for Ener- gy Reliability and Security (SPIDERS) Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD). The purpose of the test was to improve cyber security around installations, bolster survivability during a blackout using a microgrid and smart grid technology demo and share that knowl- edge with the non-military services infrastructure sup- porting the test locations. Successful test results hold promise for investment on military installations across

    1. Mehta, Aaron. “Pentagon Weighs New Requirements to Secure Military’s Vulnerable Power Grid. “ Defense News Online. 2017. https://www.defensenews.com/pentagon/2017/11/29/penta- gon-weighs-new-requirements-to-secure-militarys-vulnerable-pow- er-grid/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_cam- paign=EBB 11.30.17&utm_term=Editorial – Early Bird Brief.
  • Koppel, Ted. Lights Out: A Cyberattack, a Nation Unprepared, Surviving the Aftermath. New York, NY: Crown Publishers, 2015: 95-100.

  • the DoD, as well as sharing with vital services supplying the military and the community. Adoption of this concept generates the possibly for integration of renewable, like micro-nuclear reactors, and other distributed energy generation concepts to increase endurance during a natural or man-made widespread outage of the pow- er grid.164 Addition of a SPIDERS infrastructure extends beyond military installations and local communities as cyber security improvements could also lead to protec- tion of uplink and downlink stations thus improving resil- ience of space borne assets from infection.

    The results of the SPIDERS JCTD highlight the impor- tance of infrastructure investment and decisions at DoD facilities while reducing the unacceptably high risk of an extended outage of the power grid. The original SPI- DERS initiative launched under the co-sponsorship of the DoD, Department of Energy (DOE), and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and demonstrated the sur- vivability of an installation protected by a cyber secure micro-grid, smart grid technologies and investment in infrastructure modifications. The SPIDERS technology delivered capabilities tied to power generation reliability, installation and cyber security, reduction of energy costs while being cost effective, and minimizing environmen- tal impacts, all goals the DoD seeks to achieve.165

    The Joint Staff can further signal their support to Con- gress by addressing this need through use of the Joint Risk Assessment Framework to develop a prioritized list of critical DoD infrastructure necessary to defend the homeland and execute Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan-directed contingency operations. Upon completion of this list and with SPIDERS funding approval, each af- fected Service can execute necessary activities to hard- en their networks, infrastructure, and power generation capabilities thus protecting military installations from cy- ber, physical, or coordinated attacks; electromagnetic

    1. “Technology Transition Final Public Report: Smart Power Infrastructure Demonstration for Energy Reliability and Security (SPIDERS).” Naval Facilities Engineering Command. 2015. https:// energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/03/f30/spiders_final_report.pdf.
  • Ibid.

  • 163

    The develop-


    pulse attacks; space weather; and other natural events.

    The SPIDERS implementation across the Services promises to lessen the impacts of a U.S. power grid loss while hardening cyber protections to critical re- sponse capabilities. The NORTHCOM and PACOM Combatant Commands, Congress, and the Services’ working together in support of this critical initiative en- able a change in prioritization of infrastructure security, often overlooked, within the defense budget. The cost is such that, with the proper advocacy, a key vulnerability to the homeland defense mission becomes manage- able and the Department of Defense priority of protect- ing the homeland is realized.

    well as increases to the overall average water tempera- ture used to cool nuclear reactors. This plan should include projections of fiscal resources and military tri- tium requirements needed to maintain and modernize the U.S. nuclear stockpile. It should also include U.S. government requirements for use of helium-3, a decay product of tritium used primarily for neutron detection when searching for special nuclear material (SNM) and

    enforcing nuclear non-proliferation agreements.

    Currently, the Department of Energy conducts tritium production using 2 to 4 commercial nuclear pressur- ized water reactors (PWRs) run by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA).167 This commercial capability currently meets the U.S. stockpile tritium production capability; however, due to the overall age of the U.S. nuclear pow- er industry, future PWRs may not be available to contin- ue tritium production.168 The loss of tritium production directly reduces the effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear stockpile by reducing or hindering the overall yield pro- duced by the nuclear warheads. Without an effective U.S. nuclear stockpile, the U.S. cannot deter peer nu- clear competitors and rogue nuclear states increasing the risk to all-out war against the United States.169

    Directly tied to tritium production is the future of the nu- clear power industry. It is filled with an aging fleet of re- actors built in the late 1960s and 1970s. Most receive a commercial license by the Nuclear Regulatory Commis- sion (NRC) to operate on average 30 years, but many have or are seeking extensions to increase the opera- tions out to 40 and 50 years.170 The age of the industry

    1. Special Nuclear Material (SNM) refers to fissile nuclear ma- terial such as uranium 235 or plutonium 239 that is used as fuel in nuclear weapons.
  • NNSA Expanding Tritium Production at TVA Reactors. Vol. 245 Access Intelligence, LLC, 2010.

  • Horner, Daniel, “GAO Finds Problems in Tritium Production.” Arms Control Association. 2010. https://www.armscontrol.org/ act/2010_11/GAOTritium.

  • Schelling, Thomas C. Arms and Influence. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966: 22-23.

  • Lester, Richard K. “A Roadmap for U.S. Nuclear Energy Inno- vation.” Issues in Science and Technology 32, no. 2:45-54. 2016.

  • 166

    Problem: Climate Change and Threats to Nuclear Weapons Infrastructure

    Recommendation: The U.S. Department of De- fense, in combination with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) should develop a long term 15 to 20 year tritium production plan that accounts for advances in nuclear technology and the pos- sibility of rising climate induced water levels as well as increases to the overall average water temperature used to cool nuclear reactors. This plan should include projections of fiscal resourc- es and military tritium requirements needed to maintain and modernize the U.S. nuclear stock- pile. It should also include U.S. government re- quirements for use of helium-3, a decay product of tritium used primarily for neutron detection when searching for special nuclear material (SNM) and enforcing nuclear non-proliferation agreements.

    Implementation Timing: Now to 10+ Years Resource Requirement: High

    The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) in combination with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) should de- velop a long term 15 to 20-year tritium production plan that accounts for advances in nuclear technology and the possibility of rising climate induced water levels as


    and the lack of new reactors coming on-line creates a significant risk to both the environment and the mainte- nance of the U.S. nuclear stockpile. “The highest priority of nuclear innovation policy should be to promote the availability of an advanced nuclear power system 15 to 20 years from now”.171

    Nuclear reactors produce far less atmospheric pollution than fossil fuels and radioactive waste can be minimized and managed accordingly. Reducing carbon monoxide emissions in the near future must include a replacement of the underlying nuclear power production capability in this country. Increasing the underlying U.S. baseline nu- clear power generation capability from a mere 20% (and declining) to more than 80% (to cover the 60% coal pro- duction capability that currently exists) can significantly reduce greenhouse gases.172 The government will need to lead this expansion which goes against the fossil fuel business paradigms that have existed for more than 100 years. Any nuclear industry expansion must include a long term review of tritium production requirements and analyze how the government will maintain its re- quired tritium production capability.

    The production of tritium directly effects the production of helium-3. Tritium has a half-life of 12.3 years. This means that if you have 10 liters of tritium, 12.3 years later you will only have 5 liters. Every time you hit a half- life milestone (every 12.3 years) the volume of tritium available drops in half. After about 7 half-lives, tritium has decayed away to trace amounts. This affects the amount of tritium needed in our existing nuclear stock- pile and will not decrease over the next 50 to 75 years.

    An added benefit to tritium decay is the production of helium-3. This direct byproduct currently supports the non-proliferation efforts of nuclear inspectors conduct- ing treaty verification, Special Forces conducting crit- ical lost or stolen SNM search missions, and the U.S.


    1. Lester, 48.
  • Lester, 50.

  • Army’s Chemical, Nuclear, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Response forces conducting troop health and safety sweeps at suspect nuclear and industrial facili- ties or identifying the detection of SNM at suspect nu- clear weapon production facilities. The Defense Threat Reduction Agency currently has research efforts look- ing at replacing helium-3 as a detection gas since its availability in the future may come into question. The risk to these programs remains high over the next 5 to 7 years until newer viable research methods reveal stable and reliable neutron detection methods for use by the Army’s Special Forces and CBRN response forces in the field. The long-term outcome for neutron detection capability remains low due to these new technologies.

    Any expansion of nuclear power should also take into account the stability of tritium production to maintain U.S. national security through a strong nuclear deter- rence. The DoD, especially the Army, must consider the consequences if the U.S. nuclear stockpile can no lon- ger maintain its effectiveness. Without an effective stra- tegic nuclear deterrent, the risk of conventional conflict will increase.

    The strategic nuclear force is the backbone of U.S. na- tional defense. This is the last-ditch defensive capability designed to keep rational peer adversaries out of the U.S. homeland and out of direct conflict with U.S. military forces. Any erosion of this force or its value in present or future conflict mandates the need to identify alternative deterrence mechanisms at scale. The Army will need to compensate with adding more soldiers or robotic capabilities because countries may try to engage the U.S. more frequently in sub-kinetic or hybrid compelling and coercive actions to halt or dissuade U.S. foreign and national security policy motives around the world. The force may falter under the diversity of threats, with the potential for increased local escalation as a result of other peer competitors. A strong Army must compen- sate for such actions since it will be called on to hold ground, interact with populations (civilian and military), and advance and take positions to shut down enemy actions. The loss of an effective nuclear capability could overtask the U.S. Army and possibly bankrupt the coun-


    try in an attempt to maintain U.S. post-Cold War hege- mony.

    The Army should support the DoD efforts to maintain and replace tritium production levels, especially in any future climate efforts that may change the availability of nuclear power generation in the commercial sector that ultimately effects the effectiveness of the nuclear stock- pile.

    The Army can achieve this through the Nuclear Weap- on Council (a joint DoD and DOE senior decision com- mittee focused on nuclear weapon matters) under the Nuclear Weapon Council Standing and Safety Commit- tee (NWCSSC) (See Title 10 of U.S. Code section 179 for summary of the NWC).173 Currently, the Army has a position on the NWCSSC to help review safety, military requirements, and future needs of the nuclear stockpile. The NWCSSC sends its recommendations to the NWC for approval. The Army should maintain an active role on the committee and start pushing for development of a long term 15 to 20 year plan for maintaining tritium production requirements. The Army should consider the consequences to the size and technological makeup of its forces if tritium production changes and reduc- es overall nuclear stockpile effectiveness. The United States government’s ability to deter and dissuade must remain a number one priority in order for the U.S. to continue to push and achieve its national objectives of peace, prosperity, and open market competition for the benefit of the American people.174 Without a credible strategic nuclear force, the Army and the DoD risks fu- ture long term conflicts requiring extensive resources in manpower and equipment.

    1. “10 U.S. Code § 179 – Nuclear Weapons Council.” Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. No date. https://www.law. cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/179.
  • Mattis, Jim. “Secretary’s Preface,” in Nuclear Posture Review. US Department of Defense, Office of the Secretary of Defense. 2018: I-III. https://media.defense.gov/2018/Feb/02/2001872886/-1/- 1/1/2018-NUCLEAR-POSTURE-REVIEW-FINAL-REPORT.PDF.

  • Large-scale Army deployments overseas require ac- cess to ports in the continental United States. While rising seas are a near-term concern for some ports and shipyards, our research indicated that the major trans-shipping areas used by the U.S. Army are insen- sitive to the mid-range predictions for sea-level rise and would remain accessible to the Army in those scenarios.


    Problem: Port Access Challenges Due to Rising Seas

    Recommendation: No action – Continue to Monitor.



    The implications of significant, global, regional and local change produced by a general warming of the Earth’s climate are far too extensive to be addressed by this study. Therefore, the guiding principle of this study was to explore diverse areas of importance for the Army that are or will be likely affected by climate change and to develop reasonable, useful recommendations in con- nection with those areas. A larger and perhaps even more urgent lesson from this study is the importance of developing regular administrative and institutional structures and processes that allow the Army and the DoD to detect, evaluate, respond and regularly review the implications of systemic risk relevant to the Army’s missions and preparedness. Large scale threats like cli- mate change and mass migrations are systemic risks, with emergent features not captured by the simple sum- mation of threat-by-threat-by-threat assessments. The Army must find governance mechanisms that generate greater flexibility, without risk of compromise to the in- tegrity of the force, to deal with the various significant stresses on the Army inherent to a warming climate. These stresses are occurring for military and civilian institutions alike against the backdrop of exponential changes in technology, human population, resource consumption, urbanization, sea level rise, etc.

    It is useful to remind ourselves regularly of the capac- ity of human beings to persist in stupid beliefs in the face of significant, contradictory evidence.175 Mitigation of new large-scale stresses requires a commitment to learning, systematically, about what is happening.

    On 22 June, 1941, the Third Reich launched Operation Barbarossa, a massive invasion of the Soviet Union.

    1. This section adapted from Hill, Andrew: “Red Beard, Black Swan: Recognizing the Unexpected.” US Army War College, War Room. 2017. https://warroom.armywarcollege.edu/articles/black_ swan_red_beard/.

    The assault, named after the red-bearded (“barba ros- sa” in Italian) German crusader and emperor Frederick I, involved over 3.5 million Axis troops, killed millions, and almost destroyed the Soviet Union. Although the attack is sometimes called a “surprise,” this is mislead- ing. It is more accurate to say that Barbarossa surprised the one person who could not afford to be: Josef Stalin. How could a military operation involving about 150 divi- sions have found its political target so unprepared?

    Life is full of the unexpected, or the overlooked obvious. The term “black swan event” describes surprises of an especially momentous and nasty type. Popularized by the mathematician Nicholas Nassim Taleb in his 2007 book of the same title, Taleb argued that black swan events have three characteristics: “rarity, extreme im- pact, and retrospective (though not prospective) pre- dictability.”176 In recent years, the concept of black swan events has gained currency in political, military, and fi- nancial contexts.

    The black swan has a venerable history as an illustra- tion of the ancient epistemological problem of induction: simply stated, no number of observations of a given re- lationship are sufficient to prove that a different relation- ship cannot occur. No amount of white swan sightings can guarantee that a different color swan is not out there waiting to be seen. The discovery of black swans by European explorers in Australia has proven too tempt- ing to ignore as a powerful metaphor for the problem of induction.

    However, in emphasizing the importance of anticipa- tion, Taleb’s concept of the black swan ignores key facts about history and how it is understood by those who live it. Two characteristics of the strategic environ- ment epitomize this problem.

    1. Taleb, Nicholas Nassim. The Black Swan: The Impact of Highly Improbable Fragility. New York: Random House, 2007: xxii.


    First, the list of things that can happen but have not happened yet is long. It is, in fact, infinitely long. For each thing that exists (e.g., cats) we can come up with more variations that do not, to our knowledge, exist (fly- ing cats, cats with gills, six-legged cats, and so on). It is fun to think about all the cataclysmic, history-alter- ing events that might happen, but thinking about those things in a way that appropriately organizes them and informs strategy is extremely hard. That said, tech- niques used in Systems Thinking, when applied to this concern, often reveal relatively obvious blind spots that obscure even high impact, high likelihood events. The Chinese focus on building universities, programs and initiatives focused on Systems Thinking over the past 20 years, and the inclusion of this curriculum in the training cadets destined to lead China in the future should be notable, as it is may be the basis of large asymmetries with broad implications for the U.S. Army, the U.S. IC, the DoD, and allies.

    Second, events that present as tremendous shocks have often taken months, years, or even longer periods to emerge. In the time between weak signals of change and the onset of a deeper crisis, there are often op- portunities to prepare and adapt. These opportunities may be much more readily apparent if important “emer- gent properties” of major concern to the force, espe- cially those resulting in threat that is orthogonal to force strength, are systematically characterized.

    The real challenge with black swan events is not accu- rate anticipation, but timely recognition. While it can be useful to imagine what might happen, we should focus more on recognizing what is happening as quickly as possible and limiting the damage through timely learn- ing.

    The black plague took half a decade to advance from Sicily to the Baltic states. More recently, the 2008 finan- cial crisis is already remembered as a “shock” event

    that surprised global finance.177,178 However, the truth is more nuanced, and depressing. Notable observers of the system (including Dr. Taleb) recognized serious problems long before the fall of Lehman Brothers in September, 2008 (and the onset of a full-blown banking crisis).179,180 Yet this was mostly recognition, not predic- tion. The clearest early signal of big trouble in the mort- gage market came in the March-April, 2007 collapse of New Century Financial, an originator of risky mortgag- es, almost a year and a half before Lehman’s end, and a year before Bear Stearns was rolled up.181,182 What happened in the meantime? In All the Devils Are Here, Bethany McLean and Joe Nocera describe two embat- tled Bear Stearns asset managers who provide a micro- cosm of the wishful thinking that made the crisis much worse than it needed to be. In the face of mounting ev- idence that their investment strategy is failing, “the two men simply couldn’t bring themselves to believe that the picture was as dire as the model suggested.”183

    When the facts do not match our strong theories for how the world works, we prefer to change the facts. How can we more quickly recognize the unexpected for what it really is?

    1. Srivastava, Spriha. “On this day 8 years ago, Lehman Broth- ers collapsed: Have we learned anything?” CNBC. 2016. http:// http://www.cnbc.com/2016/09/15/on-this-day-8-years-ago-lehman-broth- ers-collapsed-have-we-learned-anything.html
  • “Crash course: The origins of the financial crisis.” The Economist. 2013. http://www.economist.com/news/schools- brief/21584534-effects-financial-crisis-are-still-being-felt-five-years- article.

  • Cox, Jeff. “Best and worst predictions of the past 25 years.” CNBC. 2014. http://www.cnbc.com/2014/07/01/best-and-worst- predictions-of-the-past-25-years.html.

  • “The collapse of Lehman Brothers.” The Telegraph. Ac- cessed August 29, 2018. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/finan- cialcrisis/6173145/The-collapse-of-Lehman-Brothers.html.

  • “New Century files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.” CNN Money. 2007. http://money.cnn.com/2007/04/02/news/companies/new_ century_bankruptcy/.

  • “Bearing all: The fall of Bear Stearns.” The Economist. 2009. http://www.economist.com/node/13226308.

  • MacLean, Bethany and Joe Nocera. All the Devils Are Here: The Hidden History of the Financial Crisis. New York: Penguin, 2011.

  • 45

    In Frank Tashlin’s classic children’s book, The Bear That Wasn’t, a bear awakes from hibernation and, exiting his cave, finds himself in a huge factory that has been built over his forest home. Encountering a foreman, the bear is told to get back to work, to which the bear replies, “I don’t work here. I’m a bear.” Incredulous, the foreman says, “You’re not a bear. You are just a silly man who needs a shave and wears a fur coat.”

    Aside from its entertainment value, the Bear that Wasn’t provides a humorous example of a profound philosophical problem: When the facts do not match our strong theories for how the world works, we prefer to change the facts. How can we more quickly recog- nize the unexpected for what it really is? The foreman (along with various executives that the bear meets) has a simple belief: No bears are in factories.

    If we have a theory of factories that says (among other things), “No bears are in factories,” the theory is based on our experiences observing who is in a factory (i.e., human workers). It is an inductive theory: every obser- vation to date has been of human workers. We could not arrive at such a theory independent of our accumu- lated experience. In addition, the more workers we see, the more certain we become (in terms of probability) that all workers are human (and none are bears), but we will never, ever observe every possibility.

    Although we should not make the unjustified leap from making a probabilistic statement based on induction to a universal statement based on deduction, we often do it anyway. Our beliefs then shape how we treat the evi- dence. For example, prior to seeing a non-white swan, we develop the following syllogism:

    1. Major Premise: All swans are white.
  • Minor Premise: That bird is a swan.

  • Conclusion: That bird is white.

  • When we see a black swan, if we are unemotion- al, Spock-like empiricists, we will immediately recognize that “if swan, then white” is false. That is, we will know that our conclusion, “that bird is white,” is false based

    on observation that the bird is black and a swan. Find- ing ourselves in a situation in which we believe that our premises are true but our conclusion is false, and there- fore not entailed by the premises, we will conclude that our major premise must not be true, and therefore reject it.

    Here is where human experience departs from the clean abstractions of logic. We are not Spock. We have emo- tional attachments to our beliefs. This is as true of atti- tudes towards a changing climate as it was of attitudes towards the financial crisis.

    Three maxims can help us avoid dangerous failures of recognition, and speed learning when unexpected things happen.

    1. Everything we believe about the world is pro- visional – “serving for the time being.” Adding the words “so far” to assertions about reality reminds us of this.
  • Unjustified certainty is very costly. The greater your certainty that you are right when you are wrong, the longer it will take you to recognize and incorporate new data into your system of belief, and to change your mind. General Doug- las MacArthur was a confident man, and this confidence usually served him well, such as when he undertook the risky landings at Incheon in the Korean War. Yet MacArthur’s confidence betrayed him when China entered the war. He was certain that this would not happen, and MacArthur’s certainty delayed his recognition of a key change, exposing forces under his com- mand to terrible risk. Confidence in your beliefs is valuable only insofar as it results in different choices (e.g., I choose A or B). Beyond that point, confidence has increasing costs.

  • Pay special attention to data that is unlikely in light of your current beliefs; it has much more information per unit, all else equal. In this sense, information content is measured as the potential to change how you think about the world. Infor-

  • 46

    mation that is probable in light of your beliefs will have minimal effects on your understand- ing. Improbable information, if incorporated, will change it.

    It is doubtless correct that many awful things that have not happened before will yet happen. Foresight regard- ing such events would be nice. It would be nicer still if we could recognize more quickly what is happening right in front of us. That is the right starting point for thinking strategically about the warming climate.


    Appendix: Weather Control

    Weather control is a fascinating and worrying potential technology. If used in with intentionally nefarious intent, its effects could be catastrophic. It is not exactly climate change in the sense that we define it here, but it brings many of the problems of climate change, with the pros- pect of these problems arising at the time and place of an adversary’s choosing.

    Naturally occurring terrestrial and space weather events constitute only one set of challenges to national securi- ty. The concept of weaponizing the natural environment is nothing new. Congressional testimony dating back to the early 1950s recommends approval of research and development funding for weather modification exper- imentation. This in response to concerns Russia was beating us in learning how to control the weather and the potential threat that posed to the United States.184 The United States has already demonstrated the po- tential to modify the weather in support of combat op- erations through its efforts in Vietnam. United States’ cloudseeding techniques used aircraft to disperse lead iodide into the atmosphere above portions of Southeast Asia to create a super-saturated environment during the Vietnamese monsoon season. The increased precipita- tion produced significant degradation of Vietnamese lo- gistic capabilities as vehicles, carts, and men remained bogged down on certain roadways and paths soaked by nearly continuous rainfall.185

    Much like the United States, potential rivals already pos-

    1. “Prohibiting Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Tech- niques,” in Multinational Corporations and United States Foreign Policy: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Multinational Corpo- rations of the Committee on Foreign Relations, vol. 3, parts 15-17: 36-37. U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Subcommittee on Multinational Corporations: 94th Cong., 2nd sess. 1976.
  • “Weather Modification.” U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Oceans and International Environment of the Committee on Foreign Relations, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess., March 20, 1974:88-93. https:// http://www.vietnam.ttu.edu/star/images/239/2390601002C.pdf.

  • sess the capability to artificially manufacture effects that manipulate the terrestrial and space weather environ- ment. An example is the superheating of the ionosphere through directed-energy generation. This capability has the potential to disrupt communications, limit capabili- ties of missile defense or other monitoring radars, and contaminate the ionosphere to such a degree as to pre- vent use of U.S. space or missile defense systems. Nor- mally these ionospheric scintillation experiments, like those performed at the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) in Alaska, are benign in na- ture and used for purely scientific research purposes. However, the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) original- ly developed, designed and operated HAARP as a joint project to perform experiments that manipulate and po- tentially control the ionosphere to enhance Department of Defense (DoD) command, control and communica- tions capabilities. Experiments ranged from extremely low-frequency waves for submarine communications to over-the-horizon-radar enhancement and even super scintillation events to disrupt or disable space assets in low Earth orbit. The HAARP program transferred to the University of Alaska for educational research after the DoD successfully accomplished their original exper- imental goals and determined to cut costs by terminat-

    ing the experiments and HAARP facility.


    However, the United States is not the sole possessor of a HAARP-like capability. Partner nations, such as Japan and Norway, operate their own antenna farms, as do Russia and China.187 The use of ionospheric sounders operated by the Air Force make it possible to monitor

    1. National Research Council. Opportunities for High-Power, High-Frequency Transmitters to Advance Ionospheric/Thermospher- ic Research: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 2014: 1,3.
  • National Research Council, 18-19.

  • 48

    when manipulations of the ionosphere occur, so it would be difficult to heat the ionosphere without anyone’s knowledge. However, the current distribution of these ionospheric sounders leaves large gaps in coverage exposing them to possible exploitation by an adversary.

    Still another artificially induced weather effect manifests through the use of a nuclear detonation to induce an artificial radiation belt. The consequences of such an event would produce significant and far-reaching im- pacts to U.S. national security. First, the electromagnet- ic pulse generated during the initial explosion mimics the disastrous costs produced by a Coronal Mass Ejec- tion (CME) induced geomagnetic storm. The United States would witness widespread power grid outages, loss of communication and navigation capabilities, plus long-term modification to the space environment. Dam- age to space assets in various satellite orbits would vary depending on detonation altitude and a loss of asset capability expected. These concerns do not spring from speculation. On July 9, 1962, the United States explod- ed the STARFISH PRIME nuclear device in the low Earth orbit at around 400 kilometers. Only 24 satellites were in orbit during the time of this test and subsequent tests that followed, but eight satellites suffered immediate damage during the tests while still others demonstrated shortened life spans from the artificially induced radia- tion belts. This nuclear testing also impacted communi- cations and changed the space operating environment for decades to follow.188

    A similar detonation in today’s congested space envi- ronment promises significantly worse outcomes. Ac- cording to the Union of Concerned Scientists website, the space environment hosts over 1,738 known satellites as of August, 2017. No country has more to lose than the United States if a space-based nuclear detonation occurred. Leading all nations at 803 satellites, the Unit- ed States has over 476 commercial, 150 governmental (with an additional 159 military), and 18 civil satellites

    1. Conrad, Edward E. et al. “Collateral Damage to Satellites from an EMP Attack.” Defense Threat Reduction Agency. 2010: 11- 15. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a531197.pdf.

    on orbit at various altitudes above the Earth.189 While

    other nations would feel the effects of such an event,

    they are less likely to feel the level of national security

    implications when compared to the United States. Con-

    cerns over North Korean intentions during recent tests

    of their growing nuclear capability raise this to a very

    real threat. There is evidence that North Korea reached

    back to the early experiments of the United States and

    the Soviet Union during the late 50s and early 60s to

    gain insights on their own nuclear program. An atmo-

    spheric or space-based test of a North Korean nuclear

    weapon, designed to demonstrate national power or

    will on the international stage, would generate substan-

    tial disadvantages to U.S. national security as losses of

    space capability occur across a wide range of possible


    Numerous additional examples exist that demonstrate the ability to manipulate the natural environment as an instrument of national power. Commonly referred to as Geoengineering, it is defined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as “a broad set of methods and technologies that aim to deliberately alter the cli- mate system to alleviate impacts of climate change.”191 However, many of the geoengineering experiments currently underway to combat climate change possess the dual-use potential for weaponization of the natural environment. A report on Chinese efforts in the arena of solar geoengineering call for a variety of terrestrial or space-based options to combat CO2 concentrations. The various methods discussed could change the physical, chemical or biological characteristics of the Earth’s climate system. While some of these options

    1. “UCS Satellite Database.” Union of Concerned Scientists. 2017. http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear-weapons/space-weapons/ satellite-database.
  • Sanger, David E. and William J. Broad. “Prospect of Atmo- spheric Nuclear Test by North Korea Raises Specter of Danger.” The New York Times. 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/22/ world/asia/north-korea-atmospheric-nuclear-test-risks.html.

  • “Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report: Summary for Policy Makers.” Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014:89. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/AR5_SYR_FI- NAL_SPM.pdf.

  • 190


    may reduce greenhouse gas concentrations, they may also potentially create negative effects to an environ- ment where one did not exist previously.192

    A report examining the United States’ history in geoen- gineering reveals very similar possibilities. A National Center for Atmospheric Research, and Environmental Studies Program explored U.S. weather modification exertions back to 1947 and found a reactionary, check- ered past. In developing science and technology op- tions, along with the accompanying legislation, weather modification ran the gamut of beneficial and detrimen- tal outcomes across society. The study recommends any plans using geoengineering in climate change mitigation would benefit from a guiding framework of rules and regulations. It further endorses the establish- ment of a centralizing U.S. federal weather modification governing body to provide proper stewardship of the environment during any experimental development or actual implementation.193 Anything less could lead to a broad range of potential environmental, technical, polit- ical, and ethical issues.

    These very concerns culminated in the United Nations General Assembly holding the Convention on the Pro- hibition of Military or any Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD) of 1976. The EN- MOD Convention was the tool used to capture the spirit of international disarmament law explicitly envisioned to keep the manipulation of the environment out of the armed conflict arsenal. An additional protocol added a further ban on the use of methods and means of war- fare that purposefully and excessively damage the en- vironment. The overall language bans the hostile use of the natural environment to wage war and went into force as of October, 1978. The United States, along with 77 other nations, have ratified the treaty and agreed to live

    by its restrictions.

    the future would carry with it an almost certain interna- tional condemnation for any nation willing to undertake the effort. If someone could prove who did it.

    1. Cao, Long, Chao-Chao Gao and Li-Yun Zhao. “Geo- engineering: Basic Science and Ongoing Research Efforts in China.” Advances in Climate Change Research, vol 6: 188- 196. 2015. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1674927815000829.
  • Hauser, Rachel. “Using Twentieth-Century U.S. Weather Mod- ification Policy to Gain Insight into Global

  • Climate Remediation Governance Issues.” Weather, Climate and Society, vol. 5: 180-191. 2013. https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/ pdf/10.1175/WCAS-D-11-00011.1.

    1. “1976 Convention on the Prohibition of Military or any Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques.” In- ternational Committee of the Red Cross, Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law. 2003. https://www.icrc.org/en/ document/1976-convention-prohibition-military-or-any-hos- tile-use-environmental-modification.


    A decision to weaponize weather in


    “Three Little Maids” From “Brainwashing-School” … Are We! +++MUST READ !+++

    This article is a backup from:

    Original article

    Backup 2

    by Patrick OCarroll

    November 16, 2018 06:07 EDT

    Angela Merkel, Theresa May, and Dalia Grybauskaitė - Then & Now
    Angela Merkel, Theresa May, and Dalia Grybauskaitė – Then & Now
    “Three Little Maids”
    From “Brainwashing-School” … Are We!
    Patrick Ocarroll
    The reason the truth sounds strange is because the licensed monopoly-media no longer carry the truth, thus vastly increasing its scarcity value. The licensed monopoly-media have become self-parodying and self-ridiculing outlets, at least when you consider the likes of Faux News, CIA Network News (CNN) or the Beast’s Brainwashing Corporation (BBC). Their motto remains “Last Week’s News Tomorrow”, and we have evidence galore of their one key maxim;
    “If It Were True, Then Why On Earth Would We Need To Keep Repeating It?”.
    Naïve people who still believe in Santa Claus may well tell you that “democracy” exists and that each electorate gets to “elect” its future “leader”.
    But here is the strange truth.
    By pure “coincidence”, the following photograph was taken at the Tavistock Institute around 1970 and shows the following trio in their teens as fellow members of the very same class in brainwashing-school for the London-NY-Axis (the English monarchy, the City of London, Wall Street and the House of Rothschild):
    Angela Merkel (now Chancellor of Germany),
    Theresa May (now Prime Minister of Britain), and
    Dalia Grybauskaite (now president of Lithuania
    Related Links:
    See also:
    This latter photograph gives us yet more confirmation that, already around 1970, all the following things were widely known in top circles across the world, because they had already been decided by the London-NY-Axis (the English monarchy, the City of London, Wall Street and the House of Rothschild):
    1. The staged “cold war” was run centrally from London and, all along, both so-called “superpowers” were under the thumb of the London-NY-Axis (the primary control mechanism of course being world Freemasonry; see also Roland Perry’s 1994 book “The Fifth Man” which exposed Victor Rothschild as the fifth member of the notorious Cambridge “spy”-ring and showed clearly how, all along, the Rothschilds were running both sides of the staged “cold war”, a “war” staged purely for big profit and brainwashing by means of the oldest trick in the book, the Hegelian Dialectic, and a “war” that made them a huge fortune; see also Father Malachi Martin’s final fact-based novel “Windswept House” depicting Freemasonry and the Church’s enemies ultimately having to please a mysterious, shadowy figure known only as “Capstone”);
    2. The London-NY-Axis had already decided the break-up of the “soviet” “union” and, along with it, the reestablishment of the three Baltic states Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia which had previously been “soviet” “republics” run from Moscow;
    3. The staged “cold war” was to be brought to a close with the reunification of Germany whose future “leader” was to be Helmut Kohl’s East-German protégé within the CDU called Angela Merkel, who had also worked in East Germany for the London-NY-Axis agency called the Stasi (“StaatsSicherheit”), itself based on and very similar in nature to the Tavistock Institute, a brainwashing and torture camp. By pure “coincidence”, when Putin was in Germany, he was Merkel’s KGB officer in Operation Luch (also called Operation Beam, Gruppe Strahl, Gruppe Lutsch). Both Kohl and Merkel were awarded the Kalergi Prize in gratitude for their contributions toward genociding the White-European-Christian population. So far, the Kalergi Prize has been awarded to the following recipients for the same effort: Raymond Barre (FR, 1978), Konstantinos Tsatsos (GR, 1980), Rudolf Kirchschläger (AT, 1982), Sandro Pertini (IT, 1984), King Juan Carlos (ES, 1986), Franz-Josef Strauss (DE, 1988), Helmut Kohl (DE, 1990), Ronald Reagan (US, 1992), Otto von Habsburg (AT, 1994), Alois Mock (AT, 1994), Lennart Meri (EE, 1996), Emil Constantinescu (RO, 1998), Yehudi Menuhin (GB/US, 2000, posthumously), Franjo Komarica (BA, 2002), Ibrahim Rugova (AL, 2004), Vaira Vike-Freiberga (LV, 2006), Wladyslaw Bartoszewski (PL, 2008), Angela Merkel (DE, 2010), Herman van Rompuy (BE, 2012), Jean-Claude Juncker (LU, 2014) and Kenneth Clarke (GB, 2016);
    4. The “soviet” “union” and East Germany were vassal states of the London-NY-Axis and in particular of the House of Rothschild, so in the late-1960s it was simple for the Rothschilds to command East German Angela Merkel and Lithuanian Dalia Grybauskaite over to Britain for their brainwashing at Tavistock (which is today centered at the University of Sussex in Brighton on the south coast of England). Anyone who believed in “defection” by “dissidents” was in fact believing in fairy-stories, possibly written by the likes of MI6-agents John Le Carré or Ian Fleming who were both Freemasons. London’s Fabian Society had a permanent desk in the Kremlin to provide financing and “advice” to communist Russia throughout its world-altering career. Chatham House (RIIA) still owns and controls the real government of Russia, the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO); it founded it on 14 Oct 1944 as its Russian affiliate. The MGIMO is the Russian equivalent of the CFR in Harold Pratt House, NYC, and these are the agencies through which the London-NY-Axis controls Russia and the US respectively by wholly bypassing the showbiz puppeticians. In late 1991, the UN assumed communist Russia’s former role in spreading soviet-totalitarianism to all countries in the world for the UN’s owners (of course the London-NY-Axis);
    5. New Soviet Europe (misleadingly titled the European “Union”) would become stronger and would even get to absorb former “soviet” republics, such as in this case Lithuania. Today, New Soviet Europe generates over 100 million euros per day in salaries and expenses for its carnival of powerless puppeticians while it serves as the template for the totalitarian “new world order” under the London-NY-Axis. A puppetician is about as relevant to the direction of his country as a logo is to the direction of a car (a “Stern” for a Mercedes, a “Stuttgarter Rössle” for a Porsche, and “Vier Ringe” for an Audi etc.; nice figureheads, but no relevance whatsoever to direction). Puppeticians are interchangeable dummies, who read dummy-boards, and only pretend to represent the public, the only tie between the two being the fact that the public are unfairly compelled to finance every puppetician’s ride on the gravy train;
    6. Women were to play an increasingly important role in future politics and in the future workplace, with the vast majority of women “leaders” born after 1950, as in these three cases, and with these three women “leaders” later installed by the London-NY-Axis into top roles of world politics. All three of these “leaders” later took major replacement-migration steps to create the single race of “Egyptoids” explicitly demanded by the Kalergi Plan, which was secretly adopted in the 1950s by Western regions especially New Soviet Europe (misleadingly titled the European “Union”) and North America. The Kalergi Plan is the London-NY-Axis plan to destroy forever the White-European-Christian population, which it perceived as the biggest obstacle to its totalitarian “new world order”, in the interests of leaving only an Ashkenazi power-elite (by pure “coincidence”, the English monarchy is, by now, most likely over 95 percent Ashkenazi);
    7. Tavistock-brainwashed “leaders” will always get the top jobs, especially those “leaders” brainwashed by Tavistock from a very young age (as in these three cases). Today, Angela Merkel is nicknamed “Merkel-Ferkel” for her porcine features, Theresa May is nicknamed “the fish-eyed zombie-corpse” while Dalia Grybauskaite is nicknamed “the ironing lady of the Baltic”. So, at some stage, voters always grow very weary of their Tavistock-brainwashed or Rothschild-installed “leaders” who, by pure “coincidence”, only ever seem to “say the right thing” before they get “elected” (in reality of course preselected by the London-NY-Axis, then to follow London-NY-Axis orders forever more thereafter). The victims of these three women “leaders” will generally invert the soviet-sloganeering rallying-cry prescribed by Tavistock with the following contradiction: it is now finally time for women to GIVE BACK their power;
    8. MI5-insider Greg Hallett is most likely bang-on correct in his MI5 research and revelations that London-NY-Axis Agent Adolf Hitler (a rabid Zionist) was brainwashed by Tavistock-predecessor Wellington House in 1912-13, as Adolf’s sister-in-law Bridget Dowling also confirmed in her autobiography (she married Adolf’s older half-brother Alois when he was a kitchen-porter at Dublin’s ritzy Shelbourne Hotel). From within London’s Luciferian-Freemasonic lodge QUATUOR CORONATI (“Crowned Quartet”), the London-NY-Axis created the NSDAP as its very own controlled-opposition agency. Keeping it simple, Wellington House most likely said: “Call them something like ‘the Nasties’ and give them feces-colored uniforms!”. Monarch Edward VII, the House of Rothschild and the top-brass of British politics at the time all belonged to the QUATUOR CORONATI lodge. The NSDAP was never required to sign the deed of surrender ending WW2 because it was on the winning side. The onerous task of surrendering was left to the three arms of the German military (none had NSDAP members); the Deutsche WehrMacht, the Deutsche KriegsMarine and the Deutsche LuftWaffe. It is very likely that Edward VII (which started planning WW1 and WW2 around 1870, as shown masterfully by Webster Tarpley) knew Adolf personally or at least knew of him, especially given the evidence that Zionist Adolf was himself a Rothschild, with Zionist Edward VII very likely a Rothschild too, on top of all that. Around 1970, Zionist Adolf had only recently croaked in his late 70s in San Carlos de Bariloche Argentina where he lived out the freedom granted him in gratitude for having smashed Germany on behalf of the London-NY-Axis, by making hundreds of deliberate military blunders. Note too: WW1 and WW2 were fought not for “freedom” or “democracy” but to establish the totalitarian “new world order” under the London-NY-Axis (the English monarchy, the City of London, Wall Street and the House of Rothschild). All that hot air about “freedom” or “democracy” was merely, as usual, deception to get men to give their lives willingly and to commit genocide (for instance as members of the Brutish Air Force) for a cause completely different from the one for which they were told they were fighting;
    9. The BrExodus-Theater may well have been planned in advance for the following three purposes:
    1. To oust David Cameron (himself a “bâtard” (blood-relative of the English monarch) whose recent ancestors controlled HSBC and laundered all monies from the genocidal opium-trade for the English monarchy, just as HSBC continues to do to this day for the same English monarchy and from the very same genocidal opium-trade, with the true purpose of the Afghan War primarily to wrest control over Afghanistan’s opium crop from the Taliban (a name that in Pashto simply means “students”, because the Taliban were students passionate about wiping out corruption in their country and about reducing that poppy crop);
    2. To install Tavistock-brainwashed Theresa May whose task it was to prevent BrExodus from happening properly, or else to force an “à-la-carte BrExodus” in accordance with the precise wishes of the London-NY-Axis (which is the real owner and controller of both Britain and the EU), meaning in particular that the sovereign tax-free offshore entity called the City of London must remain in place;
    3. To ensure that the City of London would remain a sovereign tax-free offshore entity untouched by Brussels regulators and that Britain would keep financing the EU, which all along was a project launched by the London-NY-Axis (the original founders of the EU having all been financed or bribed directly by the House of Rothschild which always wanted, and still wants, the EU to serve as an embryo for the soviet-totalitarian “new world order” still today being constructed by the London-NY-Axis as its most favored mode of socialism to control for it all the world’s human livestock (peasants, serfs and plebeians).
    4. It must be borne in mind that, in the twentieth century, international-socialism (communism), national-socialism and welfare-socialism were all launched by the London-NY-Axis as experimental forms of socialism, and that it studied their progress and results and then cherry-picked the best parts from each to construct its “now-finalized” system). From its experiments in communist Russia, the main thing the London-NY-Axis learned was that any multilingual or multicultural super-state, such as the future political bloc it was planning for Western Europe, would have to be constructed as a centralist tyranny run by a centralist bureaucracy.
    5. And that is precisely why Brussels in 2018 is much more a replica of Moscow in 1958 than anyone would care to admit. Also, by pure “coincidence”, the sovereign tax-free offshore status of the City of London is never even mentioned by the West’s Rothschild-controlled licensed monopoly-media nor even mentioned, let alone complained about, by any other EU member-states because it is totally anathema, or one of the top taboo-topics in the world, and because all major world “leaders” are in fact puppeticians owned and controlled by the London-NY-Axis. If the City of London were counted in Britain’s GDP, Britain would be unmasked as a much larger and more powerful economy, which is also why the pound currency GBP was never really in danger. But the London-NY-Axis does not want City-of-London profits being shared out among Britain’s human livestock, so Britain’s real and massive GDP remains one of its best-kept secrets. On the other hand, the London-NY-Axis does want Britain’s human livestock to continue paying lavishly into the financial black-hole that is New Soviet Europe (misleadingly titled the European “Union”).
    The British “conservative” and “labor” “parties” are wholly owned and controlled by the House of Rothschild and their “leaders” have always been chosen directly by the House of Rothschild. Since the 1960s, the “leader” of the British “conservative” “party” has always been chosen personally by Serena Dunn Rothschild, who is the owner and chief financier of the British “conservative” “party” and the wife of Jacob Rothschild. Jacob Rothschild is the de-facto owner and controller of New Soviet Europe (misleadingly titled the European “Union”) and, when he finally kicks the bucket, he is set to be succeeded in his role as Supreme-Fearless-Leader of New Soviet Europe by his imbecilic son Nathaniel Rothschild, who currently lives in Klosters-Switzerland. The only puppeticians of New Soviet Europe (misleadingly titled the European “Union”) who have any decision-making power whatsoever are the commissars of “the Eurovision Politburo” who get appointed and commanded directly by Jacob Rothschild. The politburo bears the title of “the Eurovision Commission” to accentuate its flavor as a supreme-soviet. The job of the totally powerless “Eurovision Parliament” is to just robo-sign any laws handed down to it by Jacob Rothschild and to then draw its enormous expenses and throw wild “parties”. Even a different “leader” of the British “conservative” “party”, such as controlled-opposition clown Boris Johnson (yet another member of the notorious Bullingdon Club), would again have to be chosen personally by Serena Dunn Rothschild, who would then simply demand that the new “leader” just continue following Rothschild orders. To spell this out for the hard of understanding: Meet The New Boss, Same As The Old Boss; And Meet The New World Order, Same As The Old World Order …
    By pure “coincidence”, none of the West’s Rothschild-controlled licensed monopoly-media (including the wholly Rothschild-owned center-“right” Telegraph of London and the wholly Rothschild-owned center-“left” Economist of London) ever even mention the fact that the House of Rothschild is the owner of both the British “conservative” “party” and of the EU, or the fact that, from the very start, the whole BrExodus-Theater could only ever have been a Punch & Judy Show in which both sides were always controlled directly by the House of Rothschild.
    It is likely that the House of Rothschild launched the BrExodus-Theater partly as a business venture in which it could make a mint off financial markets, e.g. through currency futures. The BrExodus-Theater is most likely being set up to deliberately fail so that each and every member-state (soviet republic really) of the EU gets a live-real-time demonstration that even “The Most Reluctant European In History” (Britain) cannot properly leave the EU; so therefore Portugal, Italy, Greece or Spain, and anyone else who may have such “pretensions”, will IMMEDIATELY have to FORGET FOR EVER any ideas they may have had about leaving New Soviet Europe (misleadingly titled the European “Union”). The very best policy may well have been never to join in the first place, as Switzerland chose (or was allowed, or designed, by the Rothschilds to choose) and as Serbia now looks like choosing.
    If the BrExodus-Theater comes to a crashing halt, then New Soviet Europe will effectively thenceforth have a check-out policy akin to that of Hotel California (which is spelled out as You Can Check Out Any Time You Like, But You Can Never Leave, followed by demonic guitar-solos by Joe Walsh and Don Felder). And this Hotel California Check-Out Policy will also apply forever to any members of the other London-NY-Axis “trading” blocs (political blocs really) being constructed today in accordance with the plans made as early as the 1850s by London-NY-Axis agent Karl Marx, who worked in London-England directly for the House of Rothschild; Marx having planned the three major blocs Europe (now the EU), North America (now NAFTA) and Asia-Pacific (now PARTA) for the Rothschilds that got adopted in the 1850s as London-NY-Axis policy for its soviet-totalitarian “new world order” because the London-NY-Axis viewed soviet-totalitarianism as being the very best way to control the human livestock by what has been labeled “a more scientific form of slavery” in countless hundreds of books over the decades by dozens of the authors themselves of the London-NY-Axis Agenda.




    Socialism always meant the scientific control of the body-social by experts for the power-elite-owners of the “human herd”; no more, no less. That is what socialism always meant and that is what socialism will always mean. Socialism never had anything to do with “helping” the poor, just as it never did yet “help” them. In fact, socialism, eugenics and human-farming are all the very same thing, or else branches of the same thing. Humanism is hardly better, with many “humanists” counted among the biggest genociders.
    The authors of the London-NY-Axis Agenda include, among others, Luciferian eugenicists HG Wells, Bertrand Russell, Aldous Huxley, Julian Huxley, Thomas Henry Huxley, Cecil Rhodes, Lionel Curtis, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Heinz-Alfred Kissinger, David Rockefeller, Maurice Strong, Charles Darwin, Francis Galton, Charles Galton-Darwin, John-Stuart Mill, Kurt Lewin, Winston Churchill, Mikhail Gorbachev, John Holdren, Rudyard Kipling, Arthur C Clarke, George-Bernard Shaw, Edward Bernays, Walter Lippmann, Jacques Attali, Arnold-Joseph Toynbee, José-Manuel Durão-Barroso, Arthur Koestler, Aleister Crowley, Alfred Pike, Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Eric Pianka, Jonas Salk, José Delgado, Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, Alan Guttmacher, David Suzuki, Jacques Cousteau, Ray Kurzweil, Alice Bailey, Peter Singer, Alan Gregg, and Robert Mueller.
    Even more notorious and historic members were Ioseb Dzhugashvili (nickname “Stalin”), Vladimir Ulyanov (nickname “Lenin”), Lev Bronstein (nickname “Trotsky”), Mao Zedong (financed into power by the London-NY-Axis and installed by the Freemasonic lodge Skull & Bones via its subgroup Yale In China, to which Mao Zedong belonged before he went on to genocide 100 million Chinese (some say 200 million) for the London-NY-Axis), and of course vaccine-genocider Bill Gates. The entire London-NY-Axis Agenda can be found in black and white in their documents and books, and it is amplified all over the web.
    George Orwell was a top-MI5-insider who knew the soviet or international-socialist agenda of the London-NY-Axis and tried to warn his readers about it in his great masterpiece 1984, probably the single greatest political (not really literature) novel of the twentieth century. Orwell’s “Outer Party” is today the combo of London’s Chatham House (RIIA) and New York’s CFR; his “Inner Party” nowadays comprises several secretive, often unnamed, groupings centered on the dark-occult All Souls College Oxford and the murky depths of Freemasonry.
    In his poorly-written 1966 classic Tragedy And Hope, the official historian to New York’s CFR, Professor Carroll Quigley, confirmed that, since around 1890, no major “leaders” in the world were ever permitted to become “leaders” unless they were first approved for the London-NY-Axis by the combo of London’s Chatham House (RIIA) and New York’s CFR (or predecessor clubs bearing names like the Milner Group). Hence, the above photograph, from around 1970, of three future “leaders” in world politics comes as absolutely no surprise to anyone who simply invested some time in reading the London-NY-Axis Agenda by the aforementioned authors, an agenda which remains very much “hidden in plain sight”, meaning it is still very widely available for full perusal across the internet and in most libraries.
    Luciferians must ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS adhere to the legalism whereby they must leave the truth in plain sight so as to give fair notice to the souls their “prince” intends to reap.
    Otherwise their “prince” Lucifer would have very little legal basis on which to claim those souls when the time finally arrived.
    Old arguments include “I Did Not Know” orI Was Only Doing My Job”, but Lucifer knows these well and is a very skillful, slick and urbane DA who is highly proficient, deft and astute at arguing his case in Court, a case he is very-well-versed in preparing and advancing.
    And although Jesus says He does not condemn, He also makes clear that the Law does condemn.
    How do we know for sure that Freemasonry is Luciferian?
    Because the writings of the all-time, top-three “officially-approved” writers on Freemasonry (Albert Pike, Manly-Palmer Hall, Albert Mackey) all made this admission and expounded in detail on how the Freemasonic godhead is in fact Lucifer.
    And to make matters even worse, this is further aggravated by the fact that the English monarch is the worldwide patron of Freemasonry. Since 1517, between 470 and 620 million human beings and counting have been genocided in the name of the English monarch.
    The London-NY-Axis may well be something akin to a Babylonian Death Cult that has been ruling the world for at least 200 years, maybe even longer.
    So now we know or now we have yet more proof of all this, the last few slow-coaches in the audience (the slowest 10 percent perhaps), who still believed that “democracy” was something real, will be obliged to revise opinions and defect to reality. “Voting” and “democracy” only ever constituted a Freemasonic ruse for providing the illusion of “choice” or “debate” while the same old London-NY-Axis agenda was being implemented anyway. “Voting” and “democracy” also constitute a Freemasonic legalism whereby a voter is deemed to give his legal consent to the evil the Freemasonic puppetician requesting that authority intends to do in his name or in the name of his country. That is also why, during its staged “cold war”, the London-NY-Axis required that “voting” and “democracy” be taken just as seriously in its vassal states to the “east” as they were to be taken in its vassal states to the “west”. It even decreed that several vassal states in the “east”, such as East Germany or Vietnam, must explicitly bear the word “democratic” in their titles. So too, for example, Freemasons consider a vote for a Freemason as implicit legal consent to the evil that Freemason intends to commit in the voter’s name (and that is exactly the legal reason why Freemasons always praise “voting” and “democracy” as if it were the bee’s knees, the fox’s socks and the cat’s pajamas all rolled into one; because they think that, in this way, they can take more souls with them when they go down, or at least that is the reasoning or “warped logic” they are applying for their “prince” Lucifer in this context).
    Despite now knowing that their “leaders” are in fact appointed, some exceedingly slow people will nonetheless choose to continue believing that “democracy” and Santa Claus are both just as fine as they are genuine.
    Recently, Maggie Rose McGrath interviewed Vinny Eastwood of Auckland-NZ and asked him the inept or perhaps quite silly question “Is New Zealand controlled by the English monarch?” to which Vinny’s quick, accurate and apt reply was “Well, we all are, Love!”; truth in simplicity. Vinny calls his show “The Lighter Side of Genocide”.
    And today, the next generation of world-soviet puppeticians is being brainwashed by the London-NY-Axis at its brainwashing and torture camp Tavistock. And it is this next generation of puppeticians that will probably oversee the final completion of the totalitarian “new world order” under the London-NY-Axis (unless the people of the world finally wake up, despite the odds of that happening currently remaining frighteningly low, probably less than 5 percent; as they just slumber on, munch on, amble on …).
    Of course, wise people realized decades or centuries ago that all future “leaders” in the world are preselected by the London-NY-Axis (the English monarchy, the City of London, Wall Street and the House of Rothschild) and that “democracy” was only ever a Freemasonic ruse whereby the blame gets shared with the populace for the evil that Freemasons intended to do in the name of that populace.
    A prime example of this blame-sharing ruse was the Second Gulf War, which the London-NY-Axis launched in March 2003 and in which the responsibility for the genocide got shared down to the populaces that voted into power (and paid taxes without protest to) those Freemasons who had planned it. Planning in earnest for the second gulf war began in 1996 from within the Freemasonic super-lodge HATHOR PENTALPHA.
    Luciferian Tony Blair, of the Freemasonic super-lodge HATHOR PENTALPHA, is often regarded as a one-man-band-act who dragged Britain into Gulf War 2003. But nothing could be further from the truth. Behind the scenes, the Freemasonic super-lodge HATHOR PENTALPHA was calling all the shots and Blair was only acting out his part [source: “Massoni; The Discovery of the Ur-Lodges” (2014), by Gioele Magaldi, grandmaster of the Freemasonic lodge Grand Orient of Italy].
    Notable members of the Freemasonic super-lodge HATHOR PENTALPHA include:
    1. Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani (IR), president;
    2. Ariel Sharon (IL), military general, prime-minister;
    3. Bill Bennett (CA), provincial puppetician, insider-trader;
    4. Condoleezza Rice (US), national security advisor;
    5. David Klein (IL), central-bankster;
    6. Donald Kagan (US), neoconservative, historian at Yale University (nicknamed Skull & Bones University);
    7. Douglas Feith (IL), neoconservative defense advisor, senior fellow at the Hudson Institute;
    8. Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Eje’i (IR), cabinet-minister, chief justice;
    9. GW Bush (US), president, member of Skull & Bones, genocider, Freemasonic dark-occult byname or cryptonym Temporary, alleged grandson of Aleister Crowley (the dark-occult byname of Crowley’s alleged daughter Barbara Bush was Enforcer);
    10. Heydar Moslehi (IR), cleric, cabinet-minister;
    11. Jan Peter Balkenende (NL), prime-minister;
    12. Joe Käser (DE), CEO of Siemens AG (the vehicle used to bribe German foreign-minister Joschka Fischer into two foreign wars by offering him 200 million euros in “consultancy” fees despite the fact that Fischer, who left school around 16, had no skills as a “consultant” besides deceit, choosing statesmanlike suits or tying his own shoelaces; today, Fischer has a net-worth of around 150 million euros for the genocide);
    13. Karl Rove (US), neoconservative, senior advisor, deputy chief of staff in the GW Bush regime;
    14. Klaus Kleinfeld (DE), CEO of Alcoa, former CEO of Siemens AG (vehicle used to bribe German foreign-minister Joschka Fischer into two foreign wars, hundreds of millions of euros for Joschka’s genociding);
    15. Mahmoud Alavi (IR), cleric, cabinet-minister;
    16. Michael Ledeen (US), neoconservative foreign-policy “analyst”;
    17. Moshe Ya’alon (IL), defense-minister, chief of general staff of Israel Defense Forces;
    18. Nicolas Sarkozy (FR), president, genocider;
    19. Osama bin-Laden (SA), “leader” of the terror organization Al-Qaeda which was launched and sponsored directly by the London-NY-Axis and by the wholly-Rothschild-owned vassal state of Israel;
    20. Peter Mandelson (GB), cabinet-minister, “trade” commissar for New Soviet Europe;
    21. Qaboos bin-Saïd (OM), sultan;
    22. Richard Perle (IL), neoconservative political “advisor”, member of PNAC, genocider, member of WINEP, member of CSP, member of the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research;
    23. Robert Zoellick (IL), MD of Goldman Sachs, president of the World Bank;
    24. Samuel Phillips Huntington (US), political scientist, senior member of the Trilateral Commission, author of the notorious doctrine “The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order” as the ideological manifesto for Freemasonry in the twenty-first century;
    25. Tamim bin-Hamad al-Thani (QA), emir;
    26. Tony Blair (GB), prime-minister, genocider;
    27. Valiollah Seif (IR), central-bankster;
    28. William Kristol (US), neoconservative political analyst and co-founder of PNAC, genocider.
    Perhaps some might assume that the presence of five Iranians on the list was the real reason why the London-NY-Axis never attacked Iran … yet.
    In September 2000, PNAC called for a “New Pearl Harbor Event” to shock the USA into multiple Middle-East wars which Freemasonic super-lodge HATHOR PENTALPHA was at the very same time planning in detail. Richard Perle and William Kristol acted as liaisons between PNAC and HATHOR PENTALPHA. By pure “coincidence”, PNAC had its wish granted by the “bad fairy” when the London-NY-Axis launched its 11 Sep 2001 attacks and its war of terror (WW3 really) on the very first day of 6001 Anno Lucis by the Sirius-based Freemasonic calendar (in honor of the Freemasonic “New Seventh Millennium”). Anno Lucis means the year of Freemasonic “prince” Lucifer. In London, HATHOR PENTALPHA trained so-called transition-teams for each target-country on the PNAC list of seven countries (Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran) which the London-NY-Axis wanted to “liberate” by genociding civilians. Each transition-team would speak the language of the target-country and would be installed into power when the carnage and destruction were drawing to a close. Several Freemasons have gone on record to say that this war of terror must last “as long as it takes” (at least until 2100), meaning that it is a war on all of humanity until it finally submits unconditionally and absolutely to the totalitarian “new world order” under the London-NY-Axis. And that can only mean that, on 11 Sep 2001, the London-NY-Axis actually launched the third of its three world wars which it had originally designed in the nineteenth century and described in Albert Pike’s letter to Giuseppe Mazzini dated 15 Aug 1871. For this reason, we must assume that the London-NY-Axis actually launched WW3 on 11 Sep 2001 and that it is intended to be a war-of-attrition lasting perhaps a century until humanity finally submits absolutely. Note: Albert Pike, Giuseppe Mazzini and Vladimir Ulyanov (nickname “Lenin”) were stellar Freemasons generally regarded and recorded as the first three ringleaders of Freemasonry’s world “revolutionary” movement.
    Nowadays, there is very little the London-NY-Axis will ever leave to “coincidence” anymore. It takes very seriously what it views as its “need” to control all important major events, while leaving minor events to “coincidence”. Its documents call for nothing short of worldwide “full-spectrum dominance”. If it does not achieve “full-spectrum dominance”, it feels that genociding humanity might be a bit more difficult and might take quite a bit longer. Power simply does NOT allow what you might think of as “democracy” to run rampant and go its own strange way. The first duty of power is to perpetuate itself by never losing power. Power always tries its very best to never, ever allow chance to take over. At the very top, power is like a military strategy that plans for every eventuality that could possibly take place, even events having tiny or remote possibilities. The whole purpose of power is to bar “coincidence” as best it can so as to thus avert the accompanying slings and arrows of outrageous “coincidence”.
    It is currently foreseen that the following general items get implemented by 2100 in the scope of the Agenda of the London-NY-Axis (the English monarchy, the City of London, Wall Street and the House of Rothschild). Of course, no one knows to what extent the London-NY-Axis will succeed since our system is, at least in theory, supposed to supply pushback as this agenda continues to be unmasked increasingly despite all the efforts of the centrally controlled licensed monopoly-media (all mainstream fake-news outlets controlled by the London-NY-Axis) to get the victims and the targets to go back to sleep:
    1. Final destruction of the world’s White-European-Christian population by 2050 as per the Kalergi Plan, the London-NY-Axis policy that was secretly adopted by Europe and North America in the 1950s. Because of inbreeding with the House of Rothschild, the English monarchy is now likely over 95 percent Ashkenazi. MI5-insider Greg Hallett stated that the House of Rothschild actually purchased the breeding rights to the English monarchy in 1818. We have no DNA to prove the allegations that William V’s grandfather (or Lady Diana’s father) was James Goldsmith-Rothschild, or that William V’s father was Guy de Rothschild, or that most of William V’s other ancestors were Rothschilds too. The eradication of the world’s White-European-Christian population may be intended in order to leave an Ashkenazi power-elite in charge of a mixed-race Proletariat having a newly invented world-irreligion known as Gaya Worship which is being pushed by London-NY-Axis agent Mikhail Gorbachev, by the UN and others. None of this sounds strange if you know what the London-NY-Axis has been up to for the past 70 years, or for the past 300 years for that matter;
    2. Deliberate asset-stripping of all middle-classes to leave two economic classes of people only. Excuses deployed by the London-NY-Axis to include “austerity” (poverty enforced, if need be, by martial-law), climate “change” (a filthy lie) and interest payable on the “national debt”, despite the latter being a wholly fictional device invented by the House of Rothschild for its own personal enrichment;
    3. Just as it planned for communist Russia, the London-NY-Axis plans that citizens of its the totalitarian “new world order” will be only either Nomenklatura or Proletariat, nothing in between, with the Nomenklatura naturally to include puppeticians, CEOs, actors, stars of Freemasonic “pop”, stars of Freemasonic “sport”, stars of Freemasonic “science” (in fact fake-science by the Chatham-House-controlled “royal” “society” of “science” which acts as the central-soviet “keeper of official-scientific-truth” for the entire world). Primarily, the Proletariat will be forced down to third-world status while the Nomenklatura will simply grow richer;
    4. Only two classes of company (either a mammoth world corporation with its very own retail trade, or else a microenterprise like “Joe the Plumber Inc”, nothing in between);
    5. Mass infertility (5G, Wi-Gig, “smart”-meters, “smart”-phones and Wi-Fi in schools, already causing most women to be sterilized by 2040, the MO being the destruction of the smooth endoplasmic reticulum of the human ovum, and with BPA or artificial estrogen in plastic bottles and can-linings deployed from the 1960s on to collapse by design the male human sperm-count, and that is already confirmed to have succeeded);
    6. Mass die-off of 90 percent of the human population (as decreed by documents on UN websites today and cited explicitly and implicitly in UN papers like Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, Codex Alimentarius etc.);
    7. Further reduction in atmospheric CO² so as to deplete O² from the Earth’s air and water, and thus impair all life on Earth but in particular to enhance genocide. In one of Mother Nature’s most spectacular touches of environmental magic, plants thrive on CO², converting CO² and sunlight to O². That means that the amount of oxygen (O²) is directly dependent on the amount of carbon-dioxide (CO²). The London-NY-Axis is demonizing CO² so it can deplete oxygen by stealth, since it would lose “credibility” (assuming it had any in the first place) if it were to target O² directly. The whole “Reduce CO²” scam is just another method by which the London-NY-Axis can kill more people, in this case effectively by suffocating them;
    8. More electronic genocide operations like the one the London-NY-Axis launched as Operation Crimson Mist in Rwanda in the four months from Apr-Jul 1994 (with similar “applications” in Gulf War 2003). The Central Lack-Of-Intelligence Agency (CIA) deployed microwaves very many times over those four months of 1994 from the same Lockheed C-130 Hercules plane above crowds of Hutus to induce them to suddenly go berserk and slaughter Tutsis. In the late 1950s, scientists had discovered that there is a precise frequency to “control” brainwaves for many things we do and feel (like rage, fear, panic, lethargy, vomiting etc.) assuming they get transmitted with an accuracy of three decimal places. The CIA agents and security-“service” people first had to point the Hutu tribesmen in the direction of the Tutsi; then induce reasonable anger on the ground by inciting them to kill, and of course ensure