The Worldwide Network of us Military Bases

https://vids.theoven.lol/videoEmbed/1448/standing-army.-die-geheime-strategie-der-us-militärbasen?channelName=Anonymous

Great post filled with extremely valuable information!

“This article has focussed on the Worldwide development of US military power. The US tends to view the Earth surface as a vast territory to conquer, occupy and exploit. The fact that the US Military splits the World up into geographic command units vividly illustrates this underlying geopolitical reality. Humanity is being controlled and enslaved by this Network of US military bases.”

How can we really stop such a huge display of military force? Are pacific organisations & movements enough? All these figures are bone chilling! Not mentionning elements not in the public domaine..!!

For those who don’t believe in the global government agenda, this is an irrefutable proof to me.

The Worldwide Network of US Military Bases when being ANTI means being FOR human rights, coexistence and peace

The Worldwide control of humanity’s economic, social and political activities is under the helm of US corporate and military power. Underlying this process are various schemes of direct and indirect military intervention. These US sponsored strategies ultimately consist in a process of global subordination. Where is the Threat?
The 2000 Global Report published in 1980 had outlined “the State of the World” by focusing on so-called “level of threats” which might negatively influence or undermine US interests.
Twenty years later, US strategists, in an attempt to justify their military interventions in different parts of the World, have conceptualized the greatest fraud in US history, namely “the Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT). The latter, using a fabricated pretext constitutes a global war against all those who oppose US hegemony. A modern form of slavery, instrumented through militarization and the “free market” has unfolded.
Major elements of the conquest and world domination strategy by the US refer to:
1) the control of the world economy and its financial markets,
2) the taking over of all natural resources (primary resources and nonrenewable sources of energy). The latter constitute the cornerstone of US power through the activities of its multinational corporations.
Geopolitical Outreach: Network of Military Bases
The US has established its control over 191 governments which are members of the United Nations. The conquest, occupation and/or otherwise supervision of these various regions of the World is supported by an integrated network of military bases and installations which covers the entire Planet (Continents, Oceans and Outer Space). All this pertains to the workings of an extensive Empire, the exact dimensions of which are not always easy to ascertain.
Known and documented from information in the public domaine including Annual Reports of the US Congress, we have a fairly good understanding of the structure of US military expenditure, the network of US military bases and the shape of this US military-strategic configuration in different regions of the World.
The objective of this article is to build a summary profile of the World network of military bases, which are under the jurisdiction and/or control of the US. The spatial distribution of these military bases will be examined together with an analysis of the multibillion dollar annual cost of their activities.
In a second section of this article, Worldwide popular resistance movements directed against US military bases and their various projects will be outlined. In a further article we plan to analyze the military networks of other major nuclear superpowers including the United Kingdom, France and Russia.
II. More than 1000 US Bases and/or Military Installations
The main sources of information on these military installations (e.g. C. Johnson, the NATO Watch Committee, the International Network for the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases) reveal that the US operates and/or controls between 700 and 800 military bases Worldwide.
In this regard, Hugh d’Andrade and Bob Wing’s 2002 Map 1 entitled “U.S. Military Troops and Bases around the World, The Cost of ‘Permanent War’”, confirms the presence of US military personnel in 156 countries.
The US Military has bases in 63 countries. Brand new military bases have been built since September 11, 2001 in seven countries.
In total, there are 255,065 US military personnel deployed Worldwide.
These facilities include a total of 845,441 different buildings and equipments. The underlying land surface is of the order of 30 million acres. According to Gelman, who examined 2005 official Pentagon data, the US is thought to own a total of 737 bases in foreign lands. Adding to the bases inside U.S. Territory, the total land area occupied by US military bases domestically within the US and internationally is of the order of 2,202,735 hectares, which makes the Pentagon one of the largest landowners worldwide (Gelman, J., 2007).
Map 1. U.S. Military Troops and Bases around the World. The Cost of «Permanent War» and Some Comparative Data

Map 2. The American Military Bases Around the World (2001-2003)

Based on a selective examination of military bases in North America, Latin America, Western Europe, the Middle East, Central Asia, Indonesia, the Philippines and Japan, several of these military bases are being used for intelligence purposes. New selected sites are Spy Bases and Satellite-related Spy Bases.
The Surface of the Earth is Structured as a Wide Battlefield
These military bases and installations of various kinds are distributed according to a Command structure divided up into five spatial units and four unified Combatant Commands (Map 4). Each unit is under the Command of a General.
The Earth surface is being conceived as a wide battlefield which can be patrolled or steadfastly supervised from the Bases.

NATO Military Bases
The Atlantic Alliance (NATO) has its own Network of military bases, thirty in total. The latter are primarily located in Western Europe:
Whiteman, U.S.A., Fairford,
Lakenheath and Mildenhall in United Kingdom,
Eindhoven in Netherlands,
Brüggen, Geilenkirchen, Landsberg, Ramstein, Spangdahlem, Rhein-Main in Germany,
Istres and Avord in France.
Morón de la Frontera and Rota in Spain,
Brescia, Vicenza, Piacenza, Aviano, Istrana, Trapani, Ancora, Pratica di Mare, Amendola, Sigonella, Gioia dell Colle, Grazzanise and Brindisi in Italy,
Tirana in Albania,
Incirlik in Turkey,
Eskan Village in Soudi Arabia and
Ali al Salem in Kuwait

III. The Global Deployment of US Military Personnel
There are 6000 military bases and/ or military warehouses located in the U.S. (See Wikipedia, February 2007).
Total Military Personnel is of the order of 1,4 million of which 1,168,195 are in the U.S and US overseas territories.
Taking figures from the same source, there are 325,000 US military personnel in foreign countries:

1. – 800 in Africa,
– 97,000 in Asia (excluding the Middle East and Central Asia),
– 40,258 in South Korea,
– 40,045 in Japan,
– 491 at the Diego Garcia Base in the Indian Ocean,
– 100 in the Philippines, 196 in Singapore,
– 113 in Thailand,
– 200 in Australia,
and 16,601 Afloat.

In Europe, there are 116,000 US military personnel including 75,603 who are stationed in Germany.
In Central Asia about 1,000 are stationed at the Ganci (Manas) Air Base in Kyrgyzstan and 38 are located at Kritsanisi, in Georgia, with a mission to train Georgian soldiers.
In the Middle East (excluding the Iraq war theater) there are 6,000 US military personnel, 3,432 of whom are in Qatar and 1,496 in Bahrain.
In the Western Hemisphere, excluding the U.S. And US territories, there are 700 military personnel in Guantanamo, 413 in Honduras and 147 in Canada.
Map 3 provides information regarding military personnel on duty, based on a regional categorization (broad regions of the world). The total number of military personnel at home in the U.S. And/or in US Territories is 1,139,034. There are 1,825 in Europe 114, 660, 682 in Sub Saharian Africa, 4, 274 in the Middle East and Southern Asia, 143 in the Ex-USSR, and 89,846 in the Pacific.
IV. The Operational Cost of the Worldwide Military Network
US defense spending (excluding the costs of the Iraq war) have increased from 404 in 2001 to 626 billion dollars in 2007 according to data from the Washington based Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. US defense spending is expected to reach 640 billion dollars in 2008.
Center for Arms control
These 2006 expenses correspond to 3.7% of the US GDP and $935.64 per capita
Figure 1. U.S. Military Expenditures since 1998

Source : Global Issues
According to Fig 1, the 396 billion dollars military budget proposed in 2003 has in fact reached 417.4 billion dollars, a 73% increase compared to 2000 (289 billion dollars). This outlay for 2003 was more than half of the total of the US discretionary budget.
Since 2003, these military expenditures have to be added to those of the Iraq war and occupation The latter reached in March 2007, according to the National Priorities Project
, a cumulative total of 413 billion dollars.
US defense budget will equal ROW combined “within 12 months
Estimates of the Defense Department budget needs, made public in 2006 in the DoD Green Book for FY 2007 are of the order of 440 billion dollars.
Military and other staff required numbered 1,332,300. But those figures do not include the money required for the “Global World on Terrorism” (GWOT). In other words, these figures largely pertain to the regular Defense budget.
A Goldstein of the Washington Post, within the framework of an article on the aspects of the National 2007 budget titled «2007 Budget Favors Defense», wrote about this topic:
“Overall, the budget for the 2007 fiscal year would further reshape the government in the way the administration has been striving to during the past half-decade: building up military capacity and defenses against terrorist threats on U.S. Soil, while restraining expenditures for many domestic areas, from education programs to train service”
2007 Budget Favors Defense
V. US Military Bases to Protect Strategic Energy Resources
In the wake of 9/11, Washington initiated its “Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT), first in Afghanistan and then in Iraq. Other countries, which were not faithfully obeying Washington’s directives including Iran, North Korea, Syria and Venezuela have been earmarked for possible US military intervention.
Washington keeps a close eye on countries opposed to US corporate control over their resources. Washington also targets countries where there are popular resistance movements directed against US interests, particularly in South America. In this context, President Bush made a quick tour to Brazil, Uruguay, Colombia, Guatemala and Mexico «to promote democracy and trade» but also with a view to ultimately curbing and restraining popular dissent to the US interests in the region. .
VOA
The same broad approach is being applied in Central Asia. According to Iraklis Tsavdaridis, Secretary of the World Peace Council (WPC):
“The establishment of U.S. Military bases should not of course be seen simply in terms of direct military ends. They are always used to promote the economic and political objectives of U.S. Capitalism. For example, U.S. Corporations and the U.S. Government have been eager for some time to build a secure corridor for US.-controlled oil and natural gas pipelines from the Caspian Sea in Central Asia through Afghanistan and Pakistan to the Arabian Sea. This region -has more than 6 percent of the world’s proven oil reserves and almost 40 percent of its gas reserves. The war in Afghanistan and the creation of U.S. Military Bases in Central Asia are viewed as a key opportunity to make such pipelines a reality.”
Stop USA
The US. Are at War in Afghanistan and Iraq. They pursue these military operations until they reach their objective which they call “VICTORY”. According to Wikipedia, American troops fighting in these countries number 190,000. The “Enduring Freedom” Operation in Iraq alone has almost 200,000 military personnel, including 26,000 from other countries participating to the US sponsored “Mission”. About 20,000 more could join other contingents in the next few months. In Afghanistan, a total of 25,000 soldiers participate to the operation (Map 6 and Map 7).
Map 6. Petroleum and International Theater of War in the Middle East and Central Asia

Map 7. American Bases Located in Central Asia

VI. Military Bases Used for the Control of Strategic Renewable Resources
US Military Bases in foreign countries, are mainly located in Western Europe: 26 of them are in Germany, 8, in Great Britain, and 8 in Italy. There are nine military installations in Japan (Wikepedia).
In the last few years, in the context of the GWOT, the US haa built 14 new bases in and around the Persian Gulf.
It is also involved in construction and/or or reinforcement of 20 bases (106 structured units as a whole) in Iraq, with costs of the order of 1.1 billion dollars in that country alone (Varea, 2007) and the use of about ten bases in Central Asia.
The US has also undertaken continued negotiations with several countries to install, buy, enlarge or rent an addional number of military bases. The latter pertain inter alia to installations in Morocco, Algeria, Mali, Ghana, Brazil and Australia (See Nicholson, B., 2007), Poland, Czech Republic (Traynor, I., 2007), Ouzbekistan, Tadjikistan, Kirghizstan, Italy (Jucca, L., 2007) and France.
Washington has signed an agreement to build a military base in Djibouti (Manfredi, E., 2007). All these initiatives are a part of an overall plan to install a series of military bases geographically located in a West-East corridor extending from Colombia in South America, to North Africa, the Near East, Central Asia and as far as the Philippines (Johnson, C., 2004). The US bases in South American are related to the control and access to the extensive natural biological , mineral and water resources resources of the Amazon Basin. (Delgado Jara, D., 2006 and Maps 9 and 10).

VII. Resistance Movements
The network of US military bases is strategic, located in prcximity of traditional strategic resources including nonrenewable sources of energy. This military presence has brought about political opposition and resistance from progressive movements and antiwar activists.
Demonstrations directed against US military presence has developed in Spain, Ecuador, Italy, Paraguay, Uzbekistan, Bulgaria and in many other countries. Moreover, other long-termer resistance movements directed against US military presence have continued in South Korea, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Philippines, Cuba, Europe, Japan and other locations.
The Worldwide resistance to US foreign military bases has grown during the last few years. We are dealing with an International Network for the Abolition of US Military Bases.
Such networks’ objective is to broadly pursue disarmament, demilitarization processes Worldwide as well as dismantle US military bases in foreign countries.
The NO BASES Network organizes educational campaigns to sensitize public opinion. It also works to rehabilitate abandoned military sites, as in the case of Western Europe.
These campaigns, until 2004, had a local and national impact.
The network is now in a position to reach people Worldwide. The network itself underscores that “much can be gained from greater and deeper linkages among local and national campaigns and movements across the globe. Local groups around the world can learn and benefit from sharing information, experiences, and strategies with each other”
“The realisation that one is not alone in the struggle against foreign bases is profoundly empowering and motivating. Globally coordinated actions and campaigns can highlight the reach and scale of the resistance to foreign military presence around the world. With the trend of rising miniaturization and resort to the use of force around the world, there is now an urgent and compelling need to establish and strengthen an international network of campaigners, organisations, and movements working with a special and strategic focus on foreign military presence and ultimately, working towards a lasting and just system of peace»
No bases!
The Afghanistan and Iraq wars have, in this regard, created a favourable momentum, which has contributed to the reinforcement of the movement to close down US military bases in foreign countries:
“At the time of an International anti-war meeting held in Jakarta in May 2003, a few weeks after the start of the Iraq invasion, a global anti-military Bases campaign has been proposed as an action to priorize among global anti-war, justice and solidarity movements» (No bases).
Since then, the campaign has acquired greater recognition. E-mail lists have been compiled nousbases@lists.riseup.net and nousbases-info@lists.riseup.net that permit the diffusion of the movement members experiences and information and discussion exchanges. That list now groups 300 people and organizations from 48 countries. A Web site permits also to adequately inform all Network members. Many rubrics provide highly valuable information on ongoing activities around the World.
In addition, the Network is more and more active and participates in different activities. At the World Social Forums it organized various conferences and colloquia. It was present at the European Social Forum held in Paris in 2003 and in London in 2004 as well as at the the America’s Social Forum in Ecuador in 2004, and at the Mediterranean Social Forum in Spain in 2005.
One of the major gatherings, which was held in Mumbai, India, in 2004, was within the framework of the World Social Forum. More than 125 participants from 34 countries defined the foundations of a coordinated global campaign.
Action priorities were identified, such as the determination of a global day of action aiming at underscoring major issues stemming from the existence of US military bases. The Network also held four discussion sessions at the Porto Alegre Social Forum in 2005. One of those pertained to the financing of the Network’s activities.
It is important to recall that the Network belongs to the Global Peace Movement. Justice and Peace organizations have become more sensitized on what was at stake regarding US military bases.
The Quito and Manta International Conference, Ecuador, March 2007
A Network World Conference for the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases was held at Quito and at Manta, Ecuador, from March 5 to 9 2007
The objective of the Conference was to underscore the political, social, environmental and economic impacts of US military bases, to make known the principles of the various Anti-Bases movements and to formally build the Network, its strategies, structure and Action Plans. The main objectives of the Conference were the following:

– Analyze the role of Foreign Military Bases and other features of military presence associated to the global dominance strategy and their impacts upon population and environment;
– Share experiences and reinforce the built solidarity resulting from the resistance battles against Foreign military Bases around the World;
– Reach a consensus on objectives mechanisms, on action plans, on coordination, on communication and on decision making of a Global Network for the abolition of all Foreign military Bases and of all other expressions of military presence; and
– Establish global action plans to fight and reinforce the resistance of local people and ensure that these actions are being coordinated at the international level.

Conclusion
This article has focussed on the Worldwide development of US military power. The US tends to view the Earth surface as a vast territory to conquer, occupy and exploit. The fact that the US Military splits the World up into geographic command units vividly illustrates this underlying geopolitical reality. Humanity is being controlled and enslaved by this Network of US military bases. .
The ongoing re-deployment of US troops and military bases has to be analyzed in a thorough manner if we wish to understand the nature of US interventionism in different regions of the World. This militarisation process is charactersied by armed aggression and warfare, as well as interventions called “cooperation agreements”. The latter reaffirmed America’s economic design design in the areas of trade and investment practices. Economic development is ensured through the miniaturization or the control of governments and organizations. Vast resources are thereby expended and wasted in order to allow such control to be effective, particuarly in regions which have a strategic potential in terms of wealth and resources and which are being used to consolidate the Empire’s structures and functions.
The setting up of the International Network for the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases turns out to be an extraordinary means to oppose the miniaturization process of the Planet. Such Network is indispensable and its growth depends on a commitment of all the People of the World. It will be extremely difficult to mobilize them, but the ties built up by the Network among its constituent resistance movements are a positive element, which is ultimately conducive to more cohesive and coordinated battle at the World level.
The Final Declaration of the Second International Conference against Foreign Military Bases which was held in Havana in November 2005 and was endorsed by delegates from 22 countries identifies most of the major issues, which confront mankind. This Declaration constitutes a major peace initative. It establishes international solidarity in the process of disarmament. .
(Conférence internationale contre les bases militaires étrangères
Déclaration finale ).

Ref: Global Research, byJules Dufour

Jules Dufour is President of the United Nations Association of Canada (UNA-C) – Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean branch and Research Associate at the Center for Research on Globalization (CRG). He is Emeritus Professor of Geography at the University of Quebec, Chicoutimi.
In 2007, Professor Jules Dufour became Chevalier de l’Ordre national du Québec, a distinction conferred by the Quebec government, for his contributions to World peace and human rights, his numerous scholarly writings and the work he accomplished in the context of national and international commissions on issues pertaining to regional development, human rights and the protection of the environment.
Translated from the French, first published on Global Research’s French language website: Mondialisation.ca
References
COMITÉ DE SURVEILLANCE OTAN. 2005. Las bases militares : un aspecto de la estrategia global de la OTAN. Intervencion del Comité Surveillance Otan en la Conferencia Internacional realizada en La Habana 7-11.11.2005. 9 pages.
DELGADO JARA, Diego. 2006. Bases de Manta, Plan Colombia y dominio de la Amazonia. Militarizacion de la Hegemonia de EE. UU. En América latina. 17 pages.
EQUIPO DE COMUNICACIÓN CONFERENCIA NO BASES. 2007. La gente del mundo no quiere bases militares extranjeras.
GELMAN, J. 2007. Terratenientes. Rebelion. 26 de Febrero de 2007, Rebelion. Terratenientes
Ghana to host US Military Base? February 26, 2006.
JOHNSON, C., America’s Empire of Bases. January 2004.
JOHNSON, C. America’s Empire of Bases. Janvier 2004 .
JOHNSON, C. 2005. The Sorrows of Empire. Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic. Henry Holt, April 2005, Paperback. 389 pages.
JOHNSON, C., 2007.. 737 U.S. Military Bases = Global Empire. February 19, 2007
JUCCA, L., 2007. Italians protest over U.S. Base expansion. Sat Feb 17, 2007.
MANFREDI, E. 2007. Djibouti : Hôtel Corne d’Afrique, grande base américaine. Le GRAND SOIR.info. Édition du 23 mars 2007.
NEW INTERNATIONALIST. 2004. The Bases of Resistance, December 2004, Issue 374.
NICHOLSON, B. 2007. Secret New Us Spy base to Get Green Light. February 15, 2 007.
TRAYNOR, I. 2007. US EXPANDS, Builds New Military Bases in Europe. The Guardian, anuary 22, 2007.
TSAVDARIDIS, I., 2005. Military Bases around the world and in Europe – the role of the USA and NATO. Novembre 2005. Stop USA / STOP United States of Agression.
VAREA, C., Las bases Militares de EEUU en Iraq. 4 mai 2006. Nodo50.
Web Sites
An Internet Guide to United States Military Bases Around the World :
American Military Bases Around the World
APPEL A UN RASSEMBLEMENT INTERNATIONAL en Mars 2007, Équateur, Pour l’abolition de toutes les bases militaires
Bases y Ejercicios Militares de EE.UU. El Comando Sur.
BUILDING A GLOBAL ANTI-MILITARY BASES MOVEMENT
Campana. Un mundo sin bases militares . Asemblea de Organizaciones y Movimientos contra la guerra, la OTAN y el Neoliberalismo (Madrid), Nodo50.
Challenges to the US Empire, Challenges to the US Empire – Empire? – Global Policy Forum.
Washington veut installer une base militaire en Algérie. Le Quotidien d’Oran, 20 juillet 2003.
Empire? Empire? – Global Policy Forum
International Conference against Foreign Military Bases. Final Declaration.
[Fsmed-general] for all that are against foreign military bases:
[Fsmed-general] for all that are against foreign military bases:en/sp/fr
FUENTES DE AGUA EN AMÉRICA LATINA :
Visiones Alternativas – Inicio
Abdulhafeth Khrisat, Impérialisme américain et politique militaire, , Université Mu’tah
Interview with Chalmers Johnson, Part 1. An Empire of More Than 725 Military Bases.
Liste des bases militaires américaines dans le monde.
Major Military Bases World-Wide,
Major Military Bases World-Wide
Military Bases Around The World, Bases Around the World
Military Bases around the world and in Europe – the role of the USA and NATO , Iraklis Tsavdaridis, Secretary of the World Peace Council (WPC) 8th November 2005, From the Greek Committee for International Detente and Peace (EEDYE), Presented on November 8, 2005 at the International Conference on Foreign Military Bases in Havana/Cuba organized by MOVPAZ :
Military Bases around the world and in Europe – the role of the USA and NATO
Military of the United States : Military of the United States – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
MOVIMIENTOS SOCIALES DE RESISTENCIA EN AMÉRICA LATINA
No a la instalacion de una base de la OTAN en Zaragoza :
No a la instalación de una base de la OTAN en Zaragoza | Ecologistas en Acción de Zaragoza
OTAN – Le grand jeu des bases militaires en terre européenne :
OTAN – Le grand jeu des bases militaires en terre européenne
Protestas contra bases militares de EEUU en Espana :
Protestas contra bases militares de EEUU en Espaa
RIQUEZA DE LA BIODIVERSIDAD EN AMÉRICA LATINA
US Military Troops and Bases Around the World :
US Military Troops and Bases Around the World- US Empire and Unilateralism – Global Policy Forum
U.S. Military Troops and Bases Around the World /united for peace & justice:
United for Peace & Justice:U.S. Military Troops and Bases Around the World
US Military Expansion and Intervention :
US Military Expansion and Intervention – Empire? – Global Policy Forum
YACIMIENTOS PETROLEROS EN AMÉRICA LATINA :
Visiones Alternativas – Inicio

LinkBacks (?)

This article was scrubbed from the regular web. I found it here: https://web.archive.org/web/20160329033332/http://www.assatashakur.org/forum/breaking-down-understanding-our-enemies/33113-worldwide-network-us-military-bases.html

Schweiz – Arzt von Polizei abgeholt und in Psychiatrie gebracht

Quelle

Sonntag, 12. April 2020 , von Freeman um 16:00

Genau das was in der Sowjetunion unter dem Kommunismus mit Oppositionellen passierte wird jetzt in der Schweiz vom Staat praktiziert. Dr. med. Thomas Binder, Kardiologie FMH aus Wettingen, hat die Polizei am Samstag abgeholt und in die Psychiatrie gebracht. Warum? Weil er sich gegen die Quarantänemassnahmen und die Begründung dafür als “Truther” äusserte. Die Schweizer Medien behaupten, weil er Drohungen gegen die Behörden ausgestossen hätte. In einem Tweet hat er geschrieben: “Vor meiner Praxis steht ein Einsatzkommando der KAPO Aargau, ich werde abgeholt, HILFE!!!!

Wie für einen Schwerverbrecher oder Terroristen sind Polizisten mit Schutzweste und Maschinenpistole in Vollmontur aufgekreuzt. Dabei sperrte die Polizei vorübergehend die angrenzende Strasse sowie den nahen Bahnhof ab.

Weil behauptet wurde, es bestehe der Verdacht, dass Dr. Thomas Binder mutmasslich psychisch labil und bewaffnet sein könnte, traf die Polizei rund um das Gebäude besondere Sicherheitsvorkehrungen. 

Dr. Binder wurde in eine psychiatrische Klinik eingewiesen. Die Ermittlungen nach den genauen Umständen der Drohungen sind angelaufen. Die Staatsanwaltschaft Baden hat eine Strafuntersuchung eröffnet.

Ja, das passiert heute mit Ärzten, die sich nicht der offiziellen staatlichen Linie betreffend Coronavirus unterwerfen und eine andere Meinung haben. Sie werden für verrückt erklärt und als Gefahr für die Gesellschaft weggesperrt.

Kollegen haben sich gemeldet:

Müsst ihr noch mehr Beweise haben, die Schweiz ist ganz schnell in eine Diktatur geraten? Kann überall mit kritischen Stimmen passieren.

Auch in Deutschland will man Quarantäne-Verweigerer in Psychiatrien einsperren. Sachsens Sozialministerin Petra Köpping (SPD) erklärte in einen Statement, im Einzelfall sei Zwang nötig, um Anordnungen durchzusetzen.

Behauptet später ja nicht, “ICH HABE VON NICHTS GEWUSST!!!”

Mir ist ähnliches 2009 passiert. Weil ich kritisch über die Massnahmen wegen der damaligen Schweinegrippe geschrieben habe, hat das Bundesamt für Gesundheit BAG in Bern mich als “gesundheits- gefährdend” bezeichnet. Ich sei eine Gefährdung für die Gesellschaft weil ich eine andere Meinung zur Impferei hatte.

Ich wurde damals vom Schweizer Fernsehen deshalb interviewt.

The Illuminati Depopulation Agenda

(Excerpted from Chapter 13: USS Persian Gulf: Big Oil & Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf…)

While the global elite construct underground bunkers, eat organic and hoard seeds in Arctic vaults; the global poor are being slowly starved thanks to high commodity prices and poisoned with genetically modified (GMO) food. Austerity measures aimed largely at the poor are being imposed on all the nations of the world. Weather events grow more deadly and brushfire wars more frequent. An AK-47 can be obtained for $49 in the markets of West Africa. The depopulation campaign of the inbredIlluminati bankers is accelerating.

In 1957 President Dwight Eisenhower, who later warned of a “military-industrial complex”, commissioned a panel of scientists to study the issue of overpopulation.  The scientists put forth Alternatives I, II and III, advocating both the release of deadly viruses and perpetual warfare as means to decrease world population.

The first supposition dovetailed nicely with the pharmaceutical interests of the Rockefellers.  According to Nexus magazine, the Rockefellers own one-half of the US pharmaceutical industry, which would reap billions developing medicines to “battle” the deadly viruses about to be released.

In 1969 the Senate Church Committee discovered that the US Defense Department (DOD) had requested a budget of tens of millions of taxpayer dollars for a program to speed development of new viruses which target and destroy the human immune system.  DOD officials testified before Congress that they planned to produce, “a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could be acquired…Most important is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.”  House Bill 5090 authorized the funds and MK-NAOMI was carried out at Fort Detrick, Maryland.

Out of this research came the AIDS virus which was targeted at “undesirable elements” of the population. The first AIDS viruses were administered through a massive smallpox vaccine campaign in central and southern Africa by the World Health Organization in 1977.  A year later ads appeared in major US newspapers soliciting “promiscuous gay male volunteers” to take part in a Hepatitis B vaccine study. [1]

The program targeted male homosexuals age 20-40 in New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, St. Louis and San Francisco. It was administered by the US Centers for Disease Control which, under its earlier incarnation as the US Public Health Department in Atlanta, oversaw the Tuskegee syphilis experiments on African American males. [2]

San Francisco has been a target of numerous CIA experiments, due to its high population of left-leaning and gay citizens, which the Illuminati views as “undesirables”.  According to Dr. Eva Snead, San Francisco has one of the highest cancer rates in the country.  For years Malathion- first developed by the Nazis- was sprayed over the city by helicopters from the CIA’s Evergreen Air, whose Arizona base is used, according to author William Cooper, as CIA transshipment point for Columbian cocaine.  The mysterious Legionnaire’s Disease occurs often in San Francisco and the CIA’s MK-ULTRA mind control bad acid program was based there.

The intellectual force behind the introduction of AIDS was the Bilderberger Group, which became fixated on population control after WWII. Author Cooper says the Policy Committee of the Bilderbergers gave orders to DOD to introduce the AIDS virus.  The Bilderbergers are close to the Club of Rome, which was founded on a Rockefeller estate near Bellagio, Italy and is backed by the same European Black Nobility who frequent Bilderberger meetings.  A 1968 study by the Club of Rome advocated lowering the birth rate and increasing the death rate.  Club founder Dr. Aurelio Peccei made a top-secret recommendation to introduce a microbe that would attack the auto-immune system, then develop a vaccine as a prophylactic for the global elite. [3]

One month after the 1968 Club of Rome meeting Paul Ehrlich published The Population Bomb. The book hints at a draconian depopulation plan in the works.  On page seventeen Ehrlich writes, “The problem could have been avoided by population control…so that a ‘death rate solution’ did not have to occur.”  A year later MK-NAOMI was born.  Peccei himself authored the Club of Rome’s much-touted Global 2000 report, which President Jimmy Carter pushed on his BCCI shakedown cruise of Africa.  Peccei wrote in the report, “Man is now vested with unprecedented, tremendous responsibilities and thrown into the role of moderator of life on the planet- including his own”.

The Bilderbergers were behind the Haig-Kissinger Depopulation Policy, a driving force at the State Department and administered by the National Security Council.  Pressure is applied to Third World countries to reduce their populations.  Those that do not comply see their US aid withheld or are subject to Pink Plan low-intensity war that targets civilians, especially women of child-bearing age.  In Africa famine and brush-fire wars are encouraged.  AK-47 rifles can be bought at West African markets for under $50.  The same is true in the markets of Peshawar, Pakistan.  In 1975, a year after attending a Club of Rome conference on the topic, Secretary of State Kissinger founded the Office of Population Affairs (OPA).

Latin American OPA case officer Thomas Ferguson spilled the beans on OPA’s agenda when he stated, “There is a single theme behind all our work; we must reduce population levels.  Either they do it our way, through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut…Once population is out of control it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…The professionals aren’t interested in reducing population for humanitarian reasons…Civil wars are somewhat drawn-out ways to reduce population.  The quickest way to reduce population is through famine like in Africa.  We go into a country and say, here is your goddamn development plan.  Throw it out the window.  Start looking at your population…if you don’t …then you’ll have an El Salvador or an Iran, or worse, a Cambodia”. [4]

Ferguson said of El Salvador, “To accomplish what the State Department deems adequate population control, the civil war (run by CIA) would have to be greatly expanded.  You have to pull all the males into fighting and kill significant numbers of fertile, child-bearing age females.  You are killing a small number of males and not enough fertile females to do the job…If the war went on 30-40 years, you might accomplish something.  Unfortunately, we don’t have too many instances of this to study”.

Report from Iron Mountain

In 1961 Kennedy Administration officials McGeorge Bundy, Robert McNamara and Dean Rusk, all CFR and Bilderberger members, led a study group which looked into “the problem of peace”.  The group met at Iron Mountain, a huge underground corporate nuclear shelter near Hudson, New York, where CFR think tank The Hudson Institute is located.  The bunker contains redundant offices in case of nuclear attack for Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell and JP Morgan Chase. [5]  A copy of the group discussions, known as Report from Iron Mountain, was leaked by a participant and published in 1967 by Dial Press.

The report’s authors saw war as necessary and desirable stating “War itself is the basic social system, within which other secondary modes of social organization conflict or conspire. (War is) the principal organizing force…the essential economic stabilizer of modern societies.”  The group worried that through “ambiguous leadership” the “ruling administrative class” might lose its ability to “rationalize a desired war”, leading to the “actual disestablishment of military institutions”.

The report goes on to say, “…the war system cannot responsibly be allowed to disappear until…we know exactly what we plan to put in its place…The possibility of war provides the sense of external necessity without which no government can long remain in power…The basic authority of a modern state over its people resides in its war powers. War has served as the last great safeguard against the elimination of necessary classes.”

Historian Howard Zinn described this conundrum when he wrote, “American capitalism needed international rivalry- and periodic war- to create an artificial community of interest between rich and poor, supplanting the genuine community of interest among the poor that showed itself in sporadic movements”.

The Iron Mountain gang was not the first to discover the virtues of war.  In 1909 the trustees of the Andrew Carnegie Foundation for International Peace met to discuss pre-WWI American life.  Many of the participants were members of Skull & Bones.  They concluded, “There are no known means more efficient than war, assuming the objective is altering the life of an entire people…How do we involve the United States in a war?”

The Report from Iron Mountain goes on to propose a proper role for those of the lower classes, crediting military institutions with providing “antisocial elements with an acceptable role in the social structure.  The younger and more dangerous of these hostile social groupings have been kept under control by the Selective Service System…A possible surrogate for the control of potential enemies of society is the reintroduction, in some form consistent with modern technology and political process, of slavery…The development of a sophisticated form of slavery may be an absolute prerequisite for social control in a world at peace.”

The Iron Mountain goons, though thrilled by the idea of slavery, listed as other socioeconomic substitutions for war: a comprehensive social welfare program, a giant open-ended space program aimed at unreachable targets, a permanent arms inspection regime, an omnipresent global police and peacekeeping force, massive global environmental pollution which would require a large labor pool to clean up, socially-oriented blood sports and a comprehensive eugenics program. [6]

The Iraqi genocide fulfilled the dreams of the Club of Rome Zero Population Growth maniacs, while also providing a testing ground for two of the war substitutes proposed by the Iron Mountain fascists: an arms inspection regime and UN peacekeepers.  Both concepts gained traction in the international community thanks to the Gulf War.

Let the Iraqi Genocide Begin

Estimates of Iraqi casualties during the Gulf War are sobering.  Some organizations like Greenpeace put the death toll at near one million people.  It was a war in which the media was denied access on a scale never before seen, so casualty figures vary greatly.  According to Tony Murphy, a researcher at the International War Crimes Tribunal, the US attack on Iraq killed 125,000 civilians, while destroying 676 schools, 38 hospitals, 8 major hydroelectric dams, 11 power plants, 119 power substations and half the country’s telephone lines.  The attacks occurred mostly at night when people were most vulnerable.

In the months following the war the death rate of Iraqi children under five tripled.  Thirty-eight percent of these deaths were caused by diarrhea. [7]  Victor Filatov, a Russian journalist reporting for Sovetskaya Rossiya from post-war Baghdad wrote, “What further bloodshed do these barbarians of the 20th century need?  I thought the Americans had changed since Vietnam…but no, they never change.  They remain true to themselves.”

According to former US Attorney General Ramsey Clark, the US was found guilty of nineteen war crimes against Iraq before the International War Crimes Tribunal.  The US dropped 88,000 tons of bombs on Iraq during the Gulf War and has rained down countless more bombs since.  Many bombs were tipped with armor piercing depleted uranium (DU) warheads, which may account for chronic Iraqi health problems.  Dr. Siegwart-Horst Gunther, a German physician who came to Iraq to help its people, became gravely ill when he handled just one cigar-sized fragment from a DU warhead.  Dr. Gunther measured the tiny object’s radioactivity to be 11 microSv per hour, whereas an acceptable exposure is no more than 300 microSv per year. [8]  Three hundred tons of DU ammunition was deployed during the war.

Many believe DU is responsible for Gulf War Syndrome, which has killed and permanently injured many US soldiers who fought in the Persian Gulf theater.  Since 2000, nearly 11,000 US Gulf War veterans have died from Gulf War Syndrome, while the Pentagon continues to cover up this travesty.

Satanism & Psychotronic Warfare

The US also tested numerous top-secret high-tech weapons systems in the Gulf theatre, while utilizing some old low-frequency favorites.  When Iraqi ground forces surrendered, many of them were in a state of delirium and lethargy that could have been induced by extremely low-frequency radio waves, which the US used as a weapon as early as the Vietnam conflict.

Yale University and CIA psychiatrist Dr. Jose Delgado studied mind control for the Company during the 1950’s as part of the MK-ULTRA program.  Delgado determined, “Physical control of many brain functions is a demonstrated fact…it is even possible to create and follow intentions…By electronic stimulation of specific cerebral structures, movements can be induced by radio command…by remote control.”

According to a military document written by Colonel Paul Valley and Major Michael Aquino titled From PSYOP to Mindwar: The Psychology of Victory, the US Army used an operational weapons system “to map the minds of neutral and enemy individuals and then to change them in accordance with US national interests”.  The technique was used to secure the surrender of 29,276 armed Viet Cong and North Vietnamese Army soldiers in 1967 and 1968.  The US Navy was also heavily involved in “psychotronic” research. [9]  Many US soldiers who served near the DMZ that divided North and South Vietnam claimed to see UFOs on a regular basis.  The Pentagon Papers revealed that an electronic barrier was placed along the DMZ by the secretive JASON Society.

Major Michael Aquino was an Army psyops specialist in Vietnam, where his unit specialized in drug-inducement, brainwashing, virus injection, brain implants, hypnosis, and use of electromagnetic fields and extremely low-frequency radio waves.  After Vietnam, Aquino moved to San Francisco and founded the Temple of Set.  Set is the ancient Egyptian name for Lucifer.  Aquino was now a senior US Military Intelligence official. [10]  He’d been given a Top Secret security clearance on June, 9, 1981.  Less than a month later an Army intelligence memo revealed that Aquino’s Temple of Set was an off-shoot of Anton La Vey’s Church of Satan, also headquartered in San Francisco. Two other Set members were Willie Browning and Dennis Mann.  Both were Army Intelligence officers.

The Temple of Set was obsessed with military matters and political fascism. It was especially preoccupied with the Nazi Order of the Trapezoid.  Aquino’s “official” job was history professor at Golden Gate College.  The Temple recruited the same Hells Angels who Billy Mellon Hitchcock had used to dole out his bad CIA acid.  Its members frequented prostitutes where they engaged in all manner of sadomasochistic activities. [11]  Director of Army Counter-Intelligence Donald Press revealed that Dennis Mann was assigned to the 306 PSYOPS Battalion and that Aquino was assigned to a top secret program known as Presidio.

Presidio was also the name of a spooky US Army base in what is now the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, which Mikhail Gorbachev reportedly frequented as the Soviet Union was falling apart.  Was Aquino part of an operation to “map the mind” of the Soviet Union’s last leader and induce him into proposing both glasnost and perestroika, the two free market policies that ultimately led to the Soviet Union’s demise?  Remember the curious mark which suddenly appeared on Gorbachev’s forehead?  Was he implanted with some sort of microchip mind-control device to make him think “in accordance with US national interests”?

Such Orwellian technology is marketed on a regular basis throughout the world.  International Healthline Corporation and others sell microchip implants in the US, Russia and Europe.  The Humane Society has adopted a policy of micro-chipping all stray pets. The State of Hawaii requires that all pets be micro-chipped.  Six thousand people in Sweden have accepted a microchip in their hand, which they use for all purchases. Trials are also underway in Japan.  In July 2002, National Public Radio reported a similar trial beginning in Seattle.  Later in 2002, after a rash of suspicious abductions of young girls, BBC reported that a British company plans to implant children with microchips so that their parents can monitor their whereabouts.

Dr. Carl Sanders, a highly acclaimed electronics engineer, revealed that a microchip project he launched to help people with severed spinal cords was taken over by the Bill Colby’s Operation Phoenix in a series of meetings organized by Henry Kissinger.  Sanders says the optimal spot for a microchip implant is just below the hairline on a person’s forehead, since the device can be recharged by changes in body temperatures, which are most pronounced there.  Interestingly, this is the location of the pineal gland or Third Eye.

The 1986 Emigration Control Act grants the President the power to mandate any kind of ID he deems necessary. [12]  Researchers at Southern California have developed a chip which mimics the hippocampus, the part of the brain that deals with memory.  Pentagon officials are interested in using it in experiments to create a “super-soldier”. [13]  Another microchip called Braingate is being implanted in paralyzed people.  It allows them to control their environment by simply thinking. [14]

In Iraq, psychological warfare gave way to slow genocide.  According to UNICEF, as of late 2001, 1.5 million Iraqi children had died as a result of sanctions, while one child in ten died before their first birthday.  Thalassemia, anemia and diarrhea were the biggest killers and could have been prevented were it not for a chronic shortage of blood and medicine in Iraq due to the sanctions.  UN Committee 661 served as arbiter of what constituted a “dual use” item and therefore banned for import into Iraq.  As of 2001, over 1,600 Iraqi contracts with Western companies for medical equipment had been blocked by 661. [15]

The Gulf War decimated Iraq’s sewer and water treatment systems. Iraqis were forced to drink polluted water, leading to numerous health problems.  Iraq was not allowed to import chlorine to clean the water since 661 deemed it a potential chemical weapon.  Electrical power was rationed in three-hour daily increments per household since the Iraqi government couldn’t get the parts it needed to fix its power plants after the US bombed its entire power grid.  With the devaluation of the Iraqi dinar and the ban on the export of 2.4 million barrels of oil per day, the average Iraqi lived on $2.50 a month- enough to buy a pair of shoes.  The only Iraqis not affected were the wealthy elite, who had long ago stashed their savings overseas in US dollars.

UNICEF estimates that 28% of Iraqi children no longer went to school.  Before the war almost all children attended.  Often families could only afford to send one child to school because of the cost of simple things like backpacks, shoes and notebooks.  Rafah Salam Aziz, Director of Mansour Children’s Hospital, said parents were often forced to make similar decisions about their children’s lives.  Aziz said, “Many times it’s easier for a family to let a baby die rather than let the whole family go hungry and get sick.”[16]

In 1996 Clinton Defense Secretary William Perry announced a new military buildup in the Persian Gulf.  Soon cruise missiles were again raining down on Baghdad.  Many nations now grew weary of both US bombing and the sanctions regime, which was brutalizing the Iraqi people while strengthening the grip of Saddam Hussein.  Russian President Boris Yeltsin, whose country signed a deal with Iraq to rebuild its shattered oil sector, said he was disturbed at the use of “extreme and radical force against the Arab world”.  The Russian opposition offered a more scalding appraisal.  Alexander Lebed stating angrily, “The US is like a strong master who spits on everybody.”[17]

Turkey, Jordan and Syria all expressed unease over the new round of bombing.  Even the Saudis, where Islamic fundamentalism was on the rise and two major bombings had occurred at US bases, now refused to allow the US to use its bases to bomb Iraq.  Many countries, including France, began openly flaunting the UN embargo against Iraq in the late 1990’s.

Dennis Halliday, former Assistant Secretary of the UN who initially headed the UN Humanitarian Program to Iraq, resigned his post in protest. He said sanctions were demolishing the very class of Iraqi people who wanted to create a better government in the country.  He was scornful of the UN Oil for Food Program under which the US received 70% of Iraqi oil.  Halliday stated plainly, “We are guilty of committing genocide, through the Security Council, against Iraq.”[18]

Halliday’s 1998 successor was Hans Van Sponeck, who watched as the UN unfurled the UNSCOM arms inspection regime, paid for by Iraqi oil sales.  US inspector Scott Ritter confirmed Iraqi suspicions that UNSCOM was gathering intelligence for CIA and Mossad.  UNSCOM was just the latest CIA tool.  In 1996 the Iraqi government claimed international relief agencies, including the World Food Program, which claimed to be helping the Kurds, were actually CIA operatives attempting to destabilize the country.

In fact the CIA had spent more than $20 million in its support of the Iraqi National Congress, led by long-time CIA surrogate Jalal Talibani’s PKK Kurdish faction. [19]  In January 1997 Iraq uncovered two Mossad spy rings in one month following the attempted assassination of Saddam Hussein’s son. [20]  Hans Van Sponeck had seen enough. He too resigned in protest.

In early 1999 it was revealed that the US had used UNSCOM to plant electronic bugging devices in the Iraqi Ministry of Defense.  Arms inspector Scott Ritter said the CIA was using UNSCOM to “provoke a crisis”.  In December 1998 UNSCOM, faced with the embarrassing accusations of espionage, pulled out of Iraq.  On December 15th the US launched a new round of bombing.  Ritter says intelligence gathered by UNSCOM was used for targeting. UNSCOM spokesman David Kay resurfaced in 2003 calling for a US invasion of Iraq. He now worked for SAIC, which landed numerous Pentagon contracts to rebuild Iraq.

[1] Behold a Pale Horse. William Cooper. Light Technology Press. Sedona, AZ. 1991. p.166

[2] Robot’s Rebellion: The Story of the Spiritual Renaissance. David Icke. Gateway Books. Bath, UK. 1994. p.305

[3] Cooper. p.166

[4] Ibid

[5] Rule by Secrecy: The Hidden History that Connects the Trilateral Commission, the Freemasons and the Great Pyramids. Jim Marrs. HarperCollins Publishers. New York. 2000. p.114

[6] Ibid. 116

[7] “Child Death Rate Jumps in Iraq”. AP. Great Falls Tribune. 9-24-92. p.8

[8] “Depleted Uranium”. Siegwart-Horst Gunther. Covert Action Quarterly. Winter 2001. p.2

[9] Cooper. p.369

[10] Icke. p.221

[11] Cooper. p.361

[12] Icke. p.223

[13] Inquirer. UK. 10-25-05

[14] PhysOrg News. 11-1-95 http://www.physorg.com/news7746.html

[15] “Greetings from Missile Street”. Free Speech TV. Boulder, CO. 12-23-01

[16] “US Economic Sanctions Taking Very Human Toll in Iraq”. Great Falls Tribune. 9-13-92.

[17] “Slamming Saddam”. Time. 9-16-96. p.31

[18] “The Unfinished War”. CNN. 1-6-02

[19] Evening Edition. National Public Radio. 9-10-96

[20] BBC World News. 1-8-97

Source

Chinese Medical Doctor is helping coronavirus patients with a powerful vitamin protocol [videos]

https://vids.theoven.lol/videoEmbed/1202/chinese-medical-doctor-is-helping-coronavirus-patients-with-a-powerful-vitamin-protocol?channelName=Anonymous

NCP (Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia) and Vitamin C

Discover what is really killing coronavirus patients

Dr. Richard Cheng is doing some magnificent work inside Wuhan, China for many of the people infected with the coronavirus. And, while government health agencies seem laser focused on just toxic medications and the hope of a vaccine, Dr. Cheng is doing much more than that.

The results are quite impressive. Listen now – in this video below – directly from Dr. Cheng.

We, at NaturalHealth365, have been reporting news about the coronavirus since its discovery in Wuhan, China. Naturally, there are many theories circulating about the origin of this virus from “just another flu strain” to speculation that this is a bioweapon designed in the Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory (Level 4) or part of the “depopulation agenda” of some very disturbed individuals.

Wherever you stand on this topic, today’s news will prove to be invaluable because the mainstream media refuses to report on the single most important aspect of this virus. The solution!

Chinese medical doctor is helping coronavirus patients with a powerful vitamin protocol

Conventionally speaking, our modern healthcare system is merely focusing their attention on travel bans, testing and isolation of infected people. And, while that all may seem to be a “reasonable” response to a potential pandemic outbreak of the 2019-nCoV (novel coronavirus). Obviously, much more needs to be done to protect all of us.

In fact, the one thing that’s not talked about – nearly enough – is how to improve (and maintain) the health of the immune system. Can vitamin C – known to be an excellent vitamin for protecting immunity – actually help people infected with the coronavirus?

After a nationwide mention in the NY Post, MSN, and Business Insider, the 10-minute video reporting on the successful use of vitamin C for the coronavirus by doctors in Wuhan has been censored on the internet. No doubt, media manipulation that suppresses lifesaving information is alive and well in the “free” world.

Ask yourself this: why is this information being suppressed by the mainstream media and conventional medical “authorities.” Do they really believe that this vitamin therapy is useless? Or, could this just be an example of profits over public safety.

I’ll let you decide. But, ultimately, it’s up to each and every one of us to do everything we can to keep our immune system strong. After all, it is our best defense against disease.

Stay tuned to NaturalHealth365 https://www.naturalhealth365.com/breaking-news-coronavirus-3308.html as we continue to report on this evolving story.

Video: https://vids.theoven.lol/v/1202

Sources:

https://youtu.be/CvUejiNAm-w

https://ia801403.us.archive.org/25/items/lOOp4UpjM2M/Coronavirus%2C%20Vitamin%20C%2C%20Fake%20News%20and%20Censorship-lOOp4UpjM2M.mp4

http://archive.is/THBbC

Orthomolecular.org

Can we shake the Coronavirus to death? New Way to Kill Viruses: Shake Them to Death

Wuhan-Coronavirus enthält einzigartige Bestandteile des HIV-Virus

Hospital-based Intravenous Vitamin C Treatmentfor Coronavirus and Related Illnesses

Terrorist Nelson Mandela and his jewish helpers

Mandela is not as depicted by the Disney Media

Nelson Mandela


Pictured right. Yossel Mashel Slovo (Joe Slovo). Slovo was born in a shtetl in Lithuania and grew up speaking Yiddish and studying the Talmud. He joined the ANC’s terrorist wing, the Umkhonto we Sizwe, in 1961 and eventually became its commander. He was named Secretary General of the South African Communist Party in 1986. (“Joe Slovo,” Jewish Chronicle, Jan. 13, 1995).
    Slovo had been the ” planner of many of the ANC terrorist attacks, including the 1983 car bomb that killed 19 people and injured many others… Slovo, who had traveled to the Soviet Union many times, was awarded a Soviet medal on his 60th birthday…Slovo is a dedicated Communist, a Marxist Leninist without morality of any kind, for whom only victory counts, whatever the human cost, whatever the bloodshed…Slovo disputes little of his image as ‘the Communist mastermind’ behind the ANC’s armed struggle. For him the fears of South Africa’s whites are both a measure of the ANC’s growing strength and a crucial factor in hastening what he believes will be its ultimate victory. ‘Revolutionary violence has created the inspirational impact that we had intended, and it has won for the ANC its leading position,’ Slovo said.” (“Rebel Strategist Seeks to End Apartheid,” L.A. Times, Aug. 16, 1987, p. 14). When Nelson Mandela’s ANC took over South Africa, Slovo was named Minister of Housing.http://whitelawtowers.blogspot.com/2010_08_01_archive.html

Mandela’s prison number seems to have morphed from 4664 to 46664 


a photo of Ronnie Kasrilswith two other good buddies: Joe Slovo – another White Communist. For decades, Joe Slovo (on the left) was the White man who led the South African Communist Party. He was said to have the rank of Colonel in the KGB. He directed all the Liberation Wars in Southern Africa at one time. When the ANC came to power they made him the Minister of Housing. He died shortly afterwards of cancer. The fellow on the right is Jacob Zuma who went on to become South Africa’s Vice President under Mbeki but whom Mbeki fired recently.http://www.africancrisis.co.za/Article.php?ID=6612&


46664 Bangle Bit of a giveaway.  Danny K, Lionel Richie and Leanne Liebenberg


Knights of Malta


Handshake  Nelson Mandela shares a Masonic handshake with South African Communist Party leader Oliver Tambo.


Vulcan Salute


Rotary symbol (& society)


AIDS-HIV racket  http://reducetheburden.org/ Celebrity sanitizing Psychopathy


David Cameron to honour Rivonia Terrorists in special ceremony – Goldberg, Ahmed and their black puppet will all be visiting Downing Street to meet our idiotic prime minister when they should all be put back in prison.

A Left wing British paper reports that,
‘’Denis Goldberg, Ahmed Kathrada & Andrew Mlangeni were political prisoners convicted at the Rivonia Trial.
 Rivonia trialists Andrew Mlangeni (r) and Denis Goldberg (l). Picture: EWN
LONDON – United Kingdom (UK) Prime Minister David Cameron will today honour three African National Congress (ANC) veterans in recognition of their contribution to the end of apartheid in South Africa.
Denis Goldberg, Ahmed Kathrada and Andrew Mlangeni, were political prisoners convicted at the Rivonia Trial for conspiring to overthrow the apartheid state through sabotage.
They stood together in the face of death 50 years ago and are now to be rewarded for their fight for justice.
The three men felt so passionately about the need for a multiracial-democracy in South Africa they were prepared to give up their lives for it.
The famous trial followed a police raid on an ANC safe house in Rivonia in 1963.
Kathrada and Goldberg were arrested and put in solitary confinement along with Mlangeni who’d been arrested at home.
Between them, the men spent 75 years in prison, but today they’ll be welcomed at Downing Street and at a gala event in aid of a charity which inspires young people to change the world.
Didn’t Cameron once wear a pro-Apartheid tshirt?
 

My thoughts about the Jewish Role in South Africa’s Demise

by Jack Sen
 
 
“Nelson Mandela was radicalised by an evil force from within his movement, with undeniable links to the Soviet Union. Even when the man set his sights on compromise, the radical Jewish element behind his pulpit, had no intention of allowing it. There was simply too much money at stake and ideological glory and capital to lose. The USSR were set on literally seizing all of South Africa’s wealth, as the communist Chinese have successfully done since. Jewish Marxist parasites like Slovo were their ticket.”
This is a truly important article the international media and mainstream historians dictating how we think, do not want you to read. So we can bring you more TRUTH, please be sure to subscribe to our FREE newsletter at the top right hand corner of this page before leaving us today.
So just how deep does Jewish Marxist involvement in Nelson Mandela’s African National Congress Party’s meteoric ascent to power run? Over the next few minutes you’ll meet the men and women behind the black-face of the party.
Before we commence with this most important exposé, I would like to state for the record that the victims of South Africa’s Jewish undoing are not solely white. While the wealthy Jews and white co-conspirators that ruined SA have since left for safer climes with sacks full of diamonds, gold, lithium and resources, the poor white, mulatto, Indian and black masses were left to die andand fight one another to the death.
Marxist hatred spares no one. It’s a group evolutionary strategy that seeks to transfer power and wealth from one group to another. Making it unique is the carnage that’s wrought  when Marxist revolution is the mechanism used to seize power….
One part hatred, one part greed and as the great Jewish Chess player (and critic of Judaism), Bobby Fischer once wrote, “as Jewish as Hanukah.” Jack
The Predominately Jewish Undoing of Once Glorious South Africa: Never Forget
by Jack Sen
Incredible article originally found in his book, How to get Suspended from UKIP and the BNP in 10 Articles and 2 Tweetssmaller book pormo k
 
The American Jewish Times writes “that July 30th will celebrate the 50th anniversary of the raid on Lilisleaf Farm, which at the time served as the headquarters of the Umkonto we Sizwe-the covert and military wing of underground African National Congress. All five of the non-indigenous defendants in the case brought against the group-as was eerily also the case in Marxist Bolshevik Russia, were foreign born Jewish radicals.  Similarly, the majority of the non-black defendants in the earlier Treason Trial (1956) were also Jewish, as was lead counsel and, defense attorneys. Israel’s Haaretz confirms that the head count of white opponents of Apartheid reads like a census list from one of the old Jewish shtetl/ghettos in Lithuania  (from where many South African Jews originated): Joe Slovo, Harold Wolpe, Ruth First, Albie Sacha, Ronald Segal, Dennis Goldberg, Rusty Bernstein, Solly Sachs, Helen Suzman, Ray Alexander, Ronnie Kasrils, Raymond Suttner, Ray Simons, Moishe Geller (American Zionist hatemonger Pamela Geller’s grand father) Wolfie Kodish and many others.”
Let me preface this story-the most in depth study of Jewish involvement with the African National Congress on the web, that the EKP views Nelson Mandela as little more than a Jewish pawn. This article will elaborate on this much ignored element of convicted terrorist Nelson Mandela’s rise to power and the destruction it has left in it’s wake. We also want to state for the record, we are NOT anti-Semitic (intentional misnomer). One of our contributors is in fact a Jewish anti-Zionist & American patriot named Harvey Goldstein. The EKP merely want to disseminate truth.
The mainstream Zionist controlled media will lead you to believe that the fall of South Africa’s so-called ‘fascist’ Apartheid regime was the result of a non-violent, organic revolution led by one Nelson Mandela and his rag-tag band of black freedom fighters; but was it? Does anyone with even the slightest shred of intelligence honestly believe that a gang of black communists had the intelligence & resources to take down a state as powerful as South Africa? These are people that believe raping babies will inoculate them against HIV. South Africa at the time was the world’s 9th largest economy.
Like the American NAACP, SPLC and most global civil rights organisations, the African National Congress (ANC) was dominated by Ashkenazi Jewish Communist radicals. Like most radical & subversive movements, ANC ring leaders were hardly representative of the oppressed dark skinned “victims” one finds on the cover of international magazines. Jews were in total control of the anti-Apartheid movement from its’ inception and Jewish business interests benefited most when the nightmare that has become black rule became a reality.
Although he was a violent, complex, and somewhat contradictory historical figure, we believe Mandela should be viewed in an objective historical manner, & without sentiment. In spite of the fact that the man undeniably has the blood of  hundreds of thousands on his hands, to downplay the role Mandela’s Jewish communist owners had in his rise to power, is to deny history.
To simply demonise the man without exposing the people and ideology behind his action, would be irresponsible.  The EKP values truth above all & will always stay true to our ethos, regardless of its popularity. Unlike the perverse liberal media painting Mandela as a hero, on one hand, & ignorant members of the right vilifying the man without looking at the actual history, on the other, we at the EKP look at the bigger picture-relying on reason & fact, never  sentiment & conjecture. We know that history, like life and people is rarely if ever, black and white. And when it is black, there’s typically an anti-European, anti-Christian Jewish Marxist or anti-European Zionist behind it.
Fact: Nelson Mandela was radicalised by an evil force from within his movement, with links to the Soviet Union. Even when the man set his sights on compromise, the radical Jewish element behind his pulpit, had no intention of allowing it. There was simply too much money at stake and ideological glory to lose. Mandela was too thick to see this, growing more and more radicalised the longer he associated with the Jewish terrorists that had hand picked him for their master plan.
The USSR, with their plants in SA, were set on literally seizing all of South Africa’s wealth, as the communist Chinese have successfully done since. Marxist parasites like Slovo were their ticket.
We demonstrate this thesis beyond any shadow of a doubt in the timeline we have compiled below.
Fact: From Joe Slovo, to Nadine Gordimer, Nathan Sharansky and  Volfie Kodish and ALL of the lawyers that represented the man at home, abroad and across the globe-almost all were Jews.
This is not to say that ALL Jews are bad-something we stated earlier, or that Mandela is not to a certain extent, responsible for his own actions-just that the minds behind the muscle, were of Jewish origin.  In fact the reason why the international media still hides what’s transpiring to your families in South Africa, has a lot to do with who runs the media and controls the narrative. As South Africa in particular is seen by the American Jewish left as the last vestige of Northern European colonial evil;, and the Boer, the poster boys for it-the Zionist media, will do their best to conceal what’s happening to South Africa’s non-black minority. Always recall who in fact facilitated the genocidal conditions in South Africa, when formulating your position on Israel. Remember it is people like Israeli activist and Zionist media darling Pamela Geller, whose grandfather fought alongside black terrorists, that were originally behind bringing bloodshed  into your country.
I’d also like to add that for me South African Apartheid state did NOT represent the European fascist ideal any more than todays Israeli Likud regime do, and their inability to gauge the strength of their enemy,  and move quickly enough with the times, ultimately cost them their country.
A fascist is not only a Western European idealist, but a civic minded pragmatist that seeks to secure his nation’s interests first & foremost. He adjusts policy based on the needs and makeup of the nation. Although governing an overwhelmingly black majority requires an iron hand, the international stage required a bit more delicacy and diplomacy, ESPECIALLY with so many Eastern European/Ashkenazi Jewish radicals, like Geller, behind the scenes.
Blacks, a race of people undeniably incapable of self-governance, need structure and a firm but fair paternalistic government to rule over them and exploit their worth; via a well-intentioned policy, not one based on barbarity. Apartheid’s undoing has as much to do with its heavy handedness & flaws as it does the pawn Mandela and his Jewish owners efforts. If the government had handled the black population as South Africa’s white land and business owners did their labourers while exploiting their services, the country wouldn’t be in the predicament it is in now.
I also base my opinion on the manner in which they treated the country’s Hindu Indian population and other productive, law abiding, ethnic minorities of non=Negro origin. Although Indians and coloureds (mulattos) are slowly moving back to the nationalist parties, their support for the ANC, because of how they were treated under the Apartheid state, was hugely important.
Apartheid’s policies were based solely on race, rather than pragmatism. In fact even Adolf Hitler, the world’s most polarising figure, was far less rigid when it came to racial politics than SA’s apartheid government.  He recognised that policy had to adapt to meet the nation’s interest – granting universal exemptions for German mischlings (part Jews), thousands of patriotic Jews, and non-white soldiers volunteering their services for the German war effort etc. The nationalist governments inability to adjust policy, embrace SA’s other non-black people and soften restrictions fast enough, aided the Internationalist Jew in his global Marxist crusade against South Africa.
Although Mandela might not have fully understood why SA’s Jewish supremacist revolutionaries had taken up his cause -blacks typically aren’t aware of their Jewish masters ulterior motivations for adopting their plight, Mandela was no dupe. Still in contrast to Slovo, even Zuma, Mandela can be seen as an ideological moderate. In our opinion Nelson Mandela made a choice to accept funding and patronage from the first people that offered him  support and became radicalised because of his inability to see right from wrong-that’s it.
by Jack Sen
Article originally found in his book
How to get Suspended from UKIP and the BNP in 10 Articles and 2 Tweets
Most Comprehensive Timeline on the Web Focusing on Zionist Involvement in South Africa’s ANC Party 
April 2, 1985 – Black-Jewish Freedom Seders (Jewish ritual feasts), co-sponsored by the Zionist Jewish Reform movement’s UAHC and the American NAACP honor jailed Soviet Jewish and African dissidents/radicals, including Natan Sharansky and convicted murderer and terrorist, Nelson Mandela.
February 11, 1986 – Zionist criminal, Natan Sharansky is released from Soviet prison. Two days later, the Israeli JTA reports that in 1984, the South African government rejected a proposed prisoner exchange that would have freed both Mandela and Sharansky. Sharansky also comments on his hope that Mandela’s freedom will be secured, referring to Mandela as a “beacon of light in a world of racist tyranny”.
February 17, 1986 – Irwin Cotler, Canadian Jewish attorney representing Sharansky and Mandela, announces an international council of lawyers, most of whom are American Jews,  who will “work relentlessly for the release of all the Sharanskys and Mandelas now rotting in  various prisons in the USSR and South Africa.’”
March 7, 1986 – American Jewish organization, B’nai B’rith’s leader Gerald Kraft calls on South African President P.W. Botha to release Mandela. The ADL follow suit as do several powerful American Jewish organizations.
December 10, 1986 – Accepting the 1986 Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo, Zionist holocaust activist, Eli Wiesel refers to the imprisonment of Mandela, internal exile of Soviet Jew, Andrei Sakharov, and the denial of Polish Jewish leader, Lech Walesa’s freedom of speech a “disgrace of equal magnitude”.
February 2, 1990 – Following a speech by President F.W. de Klerk, in which Mandela’s release from prison was promised, the Jewish community in South Africa, publicly announces through Lithuanian born anti-apartheid Jewish Stalinist, Joe Slovo, that they are hopeful for political reform.
February 11, 1990 –  Nelson Mandela is freed from prison, four years to the day after Sharansky’release. World Jewry, as evidenced by press releases from the  ADL, BB, JDL, Zionist organizations from”sea to shining sea”, is elated
June 10, 1990 – Prior to a U.S. visit, Mandela meets with American Jewish leaders in Geneva, apologizes for calling Palestinian freedom fighters his “brothers in arms” and for any other statements he may have made that “might have offended Jewish groups.” The meeting, described as “warm, friendly and cordial,” reportedly played a role in preempting American Jewish protests against the African National Congress leader.
June 20, 1990 – Mandela welcomed by U.S. Jewish groups. The following night, in a nationally televised program on ABC, Mandela again refers to PLO leader Yassar Arafat as a “comrade in arms,” upsetting Jewish owned ABC television and American Jewish groups that had sponsored  his trip. On June 29, Sharansky meets with Mandela for the first time in Los Angeles asking him to tone down his pro PLO rhetoric. You can’t bite the hand that feeds, or should I say freed you, after all.
July 1, 1990 – A Johannesburg synagogue and Zionist school, is bombed and defaced with graffiti during early hours of the morning. Mysteriously no  casualties or injuries are reported.  Jewish leaders attribute the attack to scapegoating by right-wing nationalist groups, who oppose the community’s support for the anti-apartheid movement. No one takes responsibility for the “crime”. Rumours that the bombing was a false flag circulate.
September 14, 1990 – Despite objections and alleged threats from South African nationalists and some hardline Zionist jews, a Reform rabbi in Johannesburg goes forward with his plan to invite Mandela to speak at his synagogue. Addressing the Reform congregation, the yarmulka-clad Mandela said, “If Zionism means the right of the Jewish people to seize territory and deny the Palestinian people the right to self-determination, we condemn it, but if it means a homeland for our jewish brothers we support it.” The packed synagogue heard Mandela condemn all manifestations of anti-Semitism and declare that ANC membership is open to everyone regardless of race. White and Indian South Africans are skeptical
October 24, 1990 – Mandela arouses the anger of  Australian Jewish groups upon his arrival in Canberra, likening Israel to a “terrorist state” and accusing her of “slaughtering defenseless, innocent Arabs”, forgetting his pledge to Slovo, Sharansky and the American jewish organizations he pandered to during his last visit to the States.  He later backtracks after pressure from Joe Slovo, the ANC’s top Jewish leader and self described “brains” behind the African National Congress.
July 14, 1991 – Following U.S. lead, Israel lifts cultural and economic sanctions against  South Africa after four years of crippling economic warfare. Pandering to the South Africans and strong economic and military ties with the black government commences.
April 15, 1992 – On the eve of Passover, Mandela publicly acknowledges South African Jewry’s “particularly outstanding contribution” to his people’s “struggle for freedom and social justice” for the first time. Mandela states that Jewry “sees themselves in black causes” due to the fact Jews have suffered through “one long historical holocaust for more than two thousand years.” He believes that Jews can more easily identify with blacks than Whites and East Indians, the two groups offering the most opposition to the ANC. Thus commences the official “special relationship” between Mandela and his Jewish backers.
May 4, 1992- South Africa’s Jerusalem Club invites Black speaker to address attendees for the first time, helping to forge ties between the Jewish committee and the Mandela-led ANC. From this point forth Mandela is the offical spokesperson for the  “worlds oppressed”.
August 16, 1992 – As South Africa lifts its apartheid law banning suburban settlement by blacks, Mandela moves to the upscale Jewish suburb of Houghton. Mandela’s new neighbor, member of Parliament Tony Leon of the Democratic Party, brought a gift of chocolate cake, which he left with a member of the household staff in Mandela’s absence.
August 1993 – Addressing the annual conferece of  South African Jewish Board of Deputees, Mandela’s greeted by a standing ovation, confirming improved ties following the leader’s prior remarks about the PLO.
March 1994 – With one month to go before South Africa’s first democtratic presidential elections, a JTA report anticipates “Jewish support” for Mandela’s ANC. South African Jews face the country’s first democratic elections on April 27 with a “mixture of fear and faith for the future” in the country. In spite of the fact that Mandela and the ANC’s rise to power would never have been possible without international Jewry’s financial support., South African Jewry aren’t as convinced, empowering the black majority is in fact the right move. The fears among the approximately 100,000 members of the South African Jewish community primarily relate to the widespread increase in criminal violence, particularly in Johannesburg, where over half the country’s Jews live. Blowback has historically impacted Jewry more than any other people. Think of the Jewish led Bolshevik revolution and how that ultimately blew up in their faces. Gulags anyone?
May 2, 1994 – After several days of voting, Mandela elected president in South Africa’s first “all-race” democratic elections; Jewish sentiment is reported to be optimistic. That Saturday, Nelson Mandela attends Shabbat services at the Green & Sea Point Hebrew Congregation in Cape Town, by far the largest synagogue in the Southern hemisphere. From the pulpit, Mandela, Yamulka and all, appeals for the swift return of Jewish expatriates who left for security concerns.
May 12, 1994 – Mandela meets with Israeli President Ezer Weizman before greeting several international Jewish dignitaries at a meeting in Cape Town. PLO leader Yasser Arafat was invited to join them. “He calls Arafat by his first name, Yasser,” Weizman recalled. “They embraced, and he said he and Arafat were brothers. I said: ‘Then, Mr. President, we are cousins.’ More proof the Palestinians and Israelis, at least the Arab and Sephardic Jewish inhabtants of Israel, have more in common than the Ashkenazim let up
June 1994 – Following Mandela’s election, Israel lifts its seven-year arms embargo against South Africa. The original embargo was introduced by Israels hawkish neo conservative Jewish and WASP partners in Washington.
August 1994 – Mandela is awarded Anne Frank Medal (selected by Dutch Jewry) in Amsterdam for his contributions in advancing democracy in South Africa. Later that month, Mandela states, “The victory of the democratic forces in South Africa is a contribution to this worldwide effort to rid humanity of the evil of racism. It is Anne Frank’s victory. It’s for the people of the holocaust. It is an achievement of humanity as a whole,” Invoking the holocaust is becoming as much a trademark for the Zio-schooled Mandela as his extravgant button downed dress shirts.
November 1994 – Israeli professor Michael Wolfsohn reveals that in 1989, Mandela’s release was on the table as part of a large prisoner exchange for missing Israeli soldier Ron Arad until the Berlin Wall fell.
January 5, 1995 – Housing Minister Joe Slovo, the brains behind the ANC, and one of two Jews to become part of the Mandela’s cabinet, dies of bone marrow cancer. The other Jewish cabinet member, Ronnie Kasrils, would prove to be an even more polarizing figure.
February 1995 – South African Foreign Minister Alfred Nzo announces full South African diplomatic relations with the “State of Palestine,” prompting protest from the Israeli officials that had funded the ANC since its inception.. Blacks biting the jewish hand that fed them increasingly wears on the nerves of the ANC’s jewish backers.
October 1995 – Prior to national local elections, Nelson Mandela joins Jewish ANC candidates in an appeal to the Jewish community not to emigrate from South Africa due to fear of crime. In spite of the ANC’s enormous Jewish ties, many of South Africa’s Jewish population  appear to be ruing  the fall of apartheid and fleeing the country by the tens of thousands. Blowback is the quintessential bitch!
January 1996 – Two main South African Jewish organizations with ties to the Black ANC criticize Mandela’s meeting with Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam, famous for anti-Semitic remarks in the U.S. Mandela apologises publicly, with his Jewish handlers in toe.
February 1996 – Chief Rabbi Yirael Meir Lau shares stories of his imprisonment in a concentration camp with Mandela in Pretoria. Mandela equates apartheid with the “holocaust” for the umpteenth time.
September 20, 1996 – A leading Jewish Newspaper publishes a report citing crime as the greatest reason for Jews leaving South Africa. Jewish communities become more withdrawn as their ties to the ANC strengthen. Publicly black and Jewish solidarity is at it’s peak. Privately, Jews; like Indians, Arabs even some members of the “coloured” or mulatto community, are seen as whites by rampaging South African blacks, fear for their lives and embark on a mass exodus from the nation.
September 1997 – Mandela is presented with an honorary doctorate in philosophy from Israel’s, Ben Gurion University. Zionist organization’s award is presented in Cape Town “because Mandela has indicated he will not visit the Mid East until he is able to make a meaningful contribution to the peace process.”
April 1998 – Mandela appoints Richard Goldstone, a renowned Jewish egal scholar and jurist,  to investigate an alleged high-level plot to overthrow the country’s government involving Mandela’s former wife and several of his former “colleagues”.
July 18, 1998 – The country celebrates the president’s 80th birthday. Mandela also throws secret “wedding celebration”, letting Chief Rabbi Cyril Harris in on the secret a day early in a special ceremony. The ceremony has an  “Afro-Jewish” theme to it.
August 12, 1998 – Mandela and Arafat exchange medals and embrace in a ceremony. Jewish leaders are bemused. seems Mandela still doesn’t get it.
January 1999 –Mandela is a  frequent celebrity bar mitzvah guest at high profile Jewish bar mitzvahs in South Africa.
October 19, 1999 – Mandela arrives in Israel, his adopted homeland, for the first time. Jewish and newly empowered black South Africans anticipate that their president’s visit will yield better relations between the two nations. Having recently visited Iran, Syria, Jordan the backdrop of Iran holding thirteen Jewish prisoners as alleged spies, Mandela agrees to mediate between Israel and her neighbors, stating, “”I cannot conceive of Israel withdrawing if Arab states do not recognize Israel within secure borders.”Mandela is now officially Israels, b*&^%.
February 2000 – Following his presidency, Mandela is named patron in chief of Tikkun, a private Jewish-controlled social services project founded in 1996 providig interracial adult education, skills training and AIDS relief work. Although the agency is privately managed, it is subsidised by the new ANC government.
December 13, 2000 – Mandela is key speaker at opening ceremony of the new South African Jewish Museum.
January 2002 – In Durban, Mandela retracts statements supporting the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan and comments labeling Osama bin Laden a terrorist, upsetting the Jewish community. Although the Jews are a “peace loving folk”, international Jewry openly supports the war on terror and the millions of deaths its caused worldwide.
May 2002- Lazar Sidelsky, a Jewish lawyer who’d given a young Nelson Mandela a job as a clerk in the face of apartheid restrictions, dies in Johannesburg at age 90.
October 2002 –Wolfie Kodesh, Jewish founder of the armed wing of the ANC and former member of the South African Communist party, dies at age 84. Kodesh is praised by Mandela at his funeral in Cape Town. Mandela is a key speaker at the ceremony
December 2003  – Union of Orthodox Rabbis taps new chief rabbi, Warren Goldstein, 32, to succeed Harris in January 2005. Goldstein co-authored a book with Mandela’s grandson, Dumani. Links abound!
August 2004 – Chief Rabbi Cyril Harris accuses the country’s Jews of not sufficiently supporting MaAfrika Tikkun, the community’s privately run but publicly funded outreach initiative. “There’s an unfortunate reluctance, a sort of suspicion about interacting with the black majority — particularly on the part of the older generation — which is absurd,” he said, noting “a kind of restraint” when it comes to non-Jewish causes.
April 2004 – Top  Israeli paper celebrates Jewish and ANC partnership in “rebuilding” South Africa. The new ANC created constitutional court — headed by a Jew, Chief Justice Arthur Chaskalson is touted as the nation’s greatest achievement. The JTA writes that “After some years of demoralization, the Jewish community recently has begun to rebound. It has placed in key leadership positions young, dynamic people who are less burdened by the baggage of apartheid and who are vigorously engaging with symbols of the new South Africa.” It profiles Yehuda Kay, 28, national director of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies; Zev Krengel, 31, chairman of the board’s Johannesburg area council; Avrom Krengel, 35, chair of the South African Zionist Federation; Rabbi Craig Kacev, 32, acting director of the South African Board of Jewish Education; and Warren Goldstein, 32, recently chosen as the country’s chief rabbi.
September 2004 – A review of a book about Zimbabwe by Abe Abrahamson — honorary life president of South African Zionist Federation — mentions that Abrahamson was one of six high profile Jews to visit Nelson Mandela upon the latter’s release from prison.
September 13, 2005 – Former Chief Rabbi Cyril Harris dies of cancer at age 69, and was remembered for offering a prayer at Mandela’s inauguration in 1994.
January 2008 – Anti-apartheid activist Helen Suzman, who visited Mandela in prison on several occasions, and was instrumental in the fall of apartheid, dies.
White and East Indian African Genocide continues.
by Jack Sen

The Soviet Marxist Terrorists Behind Nelson Mandela – ‘Never Forget’

David Cameron to honour Rivonia Terrorists in special ceremony – Goldberg, Ahmed and their black puppet will all be visiting Downing Street to meet our idiotic prime minister when they should all be put back in prison.

A Left wing British paper reports that,

‘’Denis Goldberg, Ahmed Kathrada & Andrew Mlangeni were political prisoners convicted at the Rivonia Trial.

LONDON – United Kingdom (UK) Prime Minister David Cameron will today honour three African National Congress (ANC) veterans in recognition of their contribution to the end of apartheid in South Africa. 

Denis Goldberg, Ahmed Kathrada and Andrew Mlangeni, were political prisoners convicted at the Rivonia Trial for conspiring to overthrow the apartheid state through sabotage. 

They stood together in the face of death 50 years ago and are now to be rewarded for their fight for justice. 

The three men felt so passionately about the need for a multiracial-democracy in South Africa they were prepared to give up their lives for it.

The famous trial followed a police raid on an ANC safe house in Rivonia in 1963. 

Kathrada and Goldberg were arrested and put in solitary confinement along with Mlangeni who’d been arrested at home. 

Between them, the men spent 75 years in prison, but today they’ll be welcomed at Downing Street and at a gala event in aid of a charity which inspires young people to change the world.

Didn’t Cameron once wear a pro-Apartheid tshirt?

 

My thoughts about the Jewish Role in South Africa’s Demise 

by Jack Sen

 

 

“Nelson Mandela was radicalised by an evil force from within his movement, with undeniable links to the Soviet Union. Even when the man set his sights on compromise, the radical Jewish element behind his pulpit, had no intention of allowing it. There was simply too much money at stake and ideological glory and capital to lose. The USSR were set on literally seizing all of South Africa’s wealth, as the communist Chinese have successfully done since. Jewish Marxist parasites like Slovo were their ticket.”

This is a truly important article the international media and mainstream historians dictating how we think, do not want you to read. So we can bring you more TRUTH, please be sure to subscribe to our FREE newsletter at the top right hand corner of this page before leaving us today.

So just how deep does Jewish Marxist involvement in Nelson Mandela’s African National Congress Party’s meteoric ascent to power run? Over the next few minutes you’ll meet the men and women behind the black-face of the party.

Before we commence with this most important exposé, I would like to state for the record that the victims of South Africa’s Jewish undoing are not solely white. While the wealthy Jews and white co-conspirators that ruined SA have since left for safer climes with sacks full of diamonds, gold, lithium and resources, the poor white, mulatto, Indian and black masses were left to die andand fight one another to the death.

Marxist hatred spares no one. It’s a group evolutionary strategy that seeks to transfer power and wealth from one group to another. Making it unique is the carnage that’s wrought  when Marxist revolution is the mechanism used to seize power….

One part hatred, one part greed and as the great Jewish Chess player (and critic of Judaism), Bobby Fischer once wrote, “as Jewish as Hanukah.” Jack

The Predominately Jewish Undoing of Once Glorious South Africa: Never Forget

by Jack Sen

Incredible article originally found in his book, How to get Suspended from UKIP and the BNP in 10 Articles and 2 Tweetssmaller book pormo k

Please be sure to purchase a copy. All proceeds go to helping our efforts in South Africa and Britain. About half the book is in fact about South Africa. Free shipping to South Africa and Britain. 

 

The American Jewish Times writes “that July 30th will celebrate the 50th anniversary of the raid on Lilisleaf Farm, which at the time served as the headquarters of the Umkonto we Sizwe-the covert and military wing of underground African National Congress. All five of the non-indigenous defendants in the case brought against the group-as was eerily also the case in Marxist Bolshevik Russia, were foreign born Jewish radicals.  Similarly, the majority of the non-black defendants in the earlier Treason Trial (1956) were also Jewish, as was lead counsel and, defense attorneys. Israel’s Haaretz confirms that the head count of white opponents of Apartheid reads like a census list from one of the old Jewish shtetl/ghettos in Lithuania  (from where many South African Jews originated): Joe Slovo, Harold Wolpe, Ruth First, Albie Sacha, Ronald Segal, Dennis Goldberg, Rusty Bernstein, Solly Sachs, Helen Suzman, Ray Alexander, Ronnie Kasrils, Raymond Suttner, Ray Simons, Moishe Geller (American Zionist hatemonger Pamela Geller’s grand father) Wolfie Kodish and many others.”

Let me preface this story-the most in depth study of Jewish involvement with the African National Congress on the web, that the EKP views Nelson Mandela as little more than a Jewish pawn. This article will elaborate on this much ignored element of convicted terrorist Nelson Mandela’s rise to power and the destruction it has left in it’s wake. We also want to state for the record, we are NOT anti-Semitic (intentional misnomer). One of our contributors is in fact a Jewish anti-Zionist & American patriot named Harvey Goldstein. The EKP merely want to disseminate truth.

The mainstream Zionist controlled media will lead you to believe that the fall of South Africa’s so-called ‘fascist’ Apartheid regime was the result of a non-violent, organic revolution led by one Nelson Mandela and his rag-tag band of black freedom fighters; but was it? Does anyone with even the slightest shred of intelligence honestly believe that a gang of black communists had the intelligence & resources to take down a state as powerful as South Africa? These are people that believe raping babies will inoculate them against HIV. South Africa at the time was the world’s 9th largest economy.

Like the American NAACP, SPLC and most global civil rights organisations, the African National Congress (ANC) was dominated by Ashkenazi Jewish Communist radicals. Like most radical & subversive movements, ANC ring leaders were hardly representative of the oppressed dark skinned “victims” one finds on the cover of international magazines. Jews were in total control of the anti-Apartheid movement from its’ inception and Jewish business interests benefited most when the nightmare that has become black rule became a reality.

Although he was a violent, complex, and somewhat contradictory historical figure, we believe Mandela should be viewed in an objective historical manner, & without sentiment. In spite of the fact that the man undeniably has the blood of  hundreds of thousands on his hands, to downplay the role Mandela’s Jewish communist owners had in his rise to power, is to deny history.

To simply demonise the man without exposing the people and ideology behind his action, would be irresponsible.  The EKP values truth above all & will always stay true to our ethos, regardless of its popularity. Unlike the perverse liberal media painting Mandela as a hero, on one hand, & ignorant members of the right vilifying the man without looking at the actual history, on the other, we at the EKP look at the bigger picture-relying on reason & fact, never  sentiment & conjecture. We know that history, like life and people is rarely if ever, black and white. And when it is black, there’s typically an anti-European, anti-Christian Jewish Marxist or anti-European Zionist behind it.

Fact: Nelson Mandela was radicalised by an evil force from within his movement, with links to the Soviet Union. Even when the man set his sights on compromise, the radical Jewish element behind his pulpit, had no intention of allowing it. There was simply too much money at stake and ideological glory to lose. Mandela was too thick to see this, growing more and more radicalised the longer he associated with the Jewish terrorists that had hand picked him for their master plan.

The USSR, with their plants in SA, were set on literally seizing all of South Africa’s wealth, as the communist Chinese have successfully done since. Marxist parasites like Slovo were their ticket.

We demonstrate this thesis beyond any shadow of a doubt in the timeline we have compiled below.

Fact: From Joe Slovo, to Nadine Gordimer, Nathan Sharansky and  Volfie Kodish and ALL of the lawyers that represented the man at home, abroad and across the globe-almost all were Jews.

This is not to say that ALL Jews are bad-something we stated earlier, or that Mandela is not to a certain extent, responsible for his own actions-just that the minds behind the muscle, were of Jewish origin.  In fact the reason why the international media still hides what’s transpiring to your families in South Africa, has a lot to do with who runs the media and controls the narrative. As South Africa in particular is seen by the American Jewish left as the last vestige of Northern European colonial evil;, and the Boer, the poster boys for it-the Zionist media, will do their best to conceal what’s happening to South Africa’s non-black minority. Always recall who in fact facilitated the genocidal conditions in South Africa, when formulating your position on Israel. Remember it is people like Israeli activist and Zionist media darling Pamela Geller, whose grandfather fought alongside black terrorists, that were originally behind bringing bloodshed  into your country.

I’d also like to add that for me South African Apartheid state did NOT represent the European fascist ideal any more than todays Israeli Likud regime do, and their inability to gauge the strength of their enemy,  and move quickly enough with the times, ultimately cost them their country.

A fascist is not only a Western European idealist, but a civic minded pragmatist that seeks to secure his nation’s interests first & foremost. He adjusts policy based on the needs and makeup of the nation. Although governing an overwhelmingly black majority requires an iron hand, the international stage required a bit more delicacy and diplomacy, ESPECIALLY with so many Eastern European/Ashkenazi Jewish radicals, like Geller, behind the scenes.

Blacks, a race of people undeniably incapable of self-governance, need structure and a firm but fair paternalistic government to rule over them and exploit their worth; via a well-intentioned policy, not one based on barbarity. Apartheid’s undoing has as much to do with its heavy handedness & flaws as it does the pawn Mandela and his Jewish owners efforts. If the government had handled the black population as South Africa’s white land and business owners did their labourers while exploiting their services, the country wouldn’t be in the predicament it is in now.

I also base my opinion on the manner in which they treated the country’s Hindu Indian population and other productive, law abiding, ethnic minorities of non=Negro origin. Although Indians and coloureds (mulattos) are slowly moving back to the nationalist parties, their support for the ANC, because of how they were treated under the Apartheid state, was hugely important.

Apartheid’s policies were based solely on race, rather than pragmatism. In fact even Adolf Hitler, the world’s most polarising figure, was far less rigid when it came to racial politics than SA’s apartheid government.  He recognised that policy had to adapt to meet the nation’s interest – granting universal exemptions for German mischlings (part Jews), thousands of patriotic Jews, and non-white soldiers volunteering their services for the German war effort etc. The nationalist governments inability to adjust policy, embrace SA’s other non-black people and soften restrictions fast enough, aided the Internationalist Jew in his global Marxist crusade against South Africa.

Although Mandela might not have fully understood why SA’s Jewish supremacist revolutionaries had taken up his cause -blacks typically aren’t aware of their Jewish masters ulterior motivations for adopting their plight, Mandela was no dupe. Still in contrast to Slovo, even Zuma, Mandela can be seen as an ideological moderate. In our opinion Nelson Mandela made a choice to accept funding and patronage from the first people that offered him  support and became radicalised because of his inability to see right from wrong-that’s it.

by Jack Sen

Article originally found in his book

How to get Suspended from UKIP and the BNP in 10 Articles and 2 Tweets

Please be sure to purchase a copy. All proceeds go to helping our efforts in South Africa and Britain. About half the book is in fact about South Africa.

Most Comprehensive Timeline on the Web Focusing on Zionist Involvement in South Africa’s ANC Party 

April 2, 1985 – Black-Jewish Freedom Seders (Jewish ritual feasts), co-sponsored by the Zionist Jewish Reform movement’s UAHC and the American NAACP honor jailed Soviet Jewish and African dissidents/radicals, including Natan Sharansky and convicted murderer and terrorist, Nelson Mandela.

February 11, 1986 – Zionist criminal, Natan Sharansky is released from Soviet prison. Two days later, the Israeli JTA reports that in 1984, the South African government rejected a proposed prisoner exchange that would have freed both Mandela and Sharansky. Sharansky also comments on his hope that Mandela’s freedom will be secured, referring to Mandela as a “beacon of light in a world of racist tyranny”.

February 17, 1986 – Irwin Cotler, Canadian Jewish attorney representing Sharansky and Mandela, announces an international council of lawyers, most of whom are American Jews,  who will “work relentlessly for the release of all the Sharanskys and Mandelas now rotting in  various prisons in the USSR and South Africa.’”

March 7, 1986 – American Jewish organization, B’nai B’rith’s leader Gerald Kraft calls on South African President P.W. Botha to release Mandela. The ADL follow suit as do several powerful American Jewish organizations.

December 10, 1986 – Accepting the 1986 Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo, Zionist holocaust activist, Eli Wiesel refers to the imprisonment of Mandela, internal exile of Soviet Jew, Andrei Sakharov, and the denial of Polish Jewish leader, Lech Walesa’s freedom of speech a “disgrace of equal magnitude”.

February 2, 1990 – Following a speech by President F.W. de Klerk, in which Mandela’s release from prison was promised, the Jewish community in South Africa, publicly announces through Lithuanian born anti-apartheid Jewish Stalinist, Joe Slovo, that they are hopeful for political reform.

February 11, 1990 –  Nelson Mandela is freed from prison, four years to the day after Sharansky’release. World Jewry, as evidenced by press releases from the  ADL, BB, JDL, Zionist organizations from”sea to shining sea”, is elated

June 10, 1990 – Prior to a U.S. visit, Mandela meets with American Jewish leaders in Geneva, apologizes for calling Palestinian freedom fighters his “brothers in arms” and for any other statements he may have made that “might have offended Jewish groups.” The meeting, described as “warm, friendly and cordial,” reportedly played a role in preempting American Jewish protests against the African National Congress leader.

June 20, 1990 – Mandela welcomed by U.S. Jewish groups. The following night, in a nationally televised program on ABC, Mandela again refers to PLO leader Yassar Arafat as a “comrade in arms,” upsetting Jewish owned ABC television and American Jewish groups that had sponsored  his trip. On June 29, Sharansky meets with Mandela for the first time in Los Angeles asking him to tone down his pro PLO rhetoric. You can’t bite the hand that feeds, or should I say freed you, after all.

July 1, 1990 – A Johannesburg synagogue and Zionist school, is bombed and defaced with graffiti during early hours of the morning. Mysteriously no  casualties or injuries are reported.  Jewish leaders attribute the attack to scapegoating by right-wing nationalist groups, who oppose the community’s support for the anti-apartheid movement. No one takes responsibility for the “crime”. Rumours that the bombing was a false flag circulate.

September 14, 1990 – Despite objections and alleged threats from South African nationalists and some hardline Zionist jews, a Reform rabbi in Johannesburg goes forward with his plan to invite Mandela to speak at his synagogue. Addressing the Reform congregation, the yarmulka-clad Mandela said, “If Zionism means the right of the Jewish people to seize territory and deny the Palestinian people the right to self-determination, we condemn it, but if it means a homeland for our jewish brothers we support it.” The packed synagogue heard Mandela condemn all manifestations of anti-Semitism and declare that ANC membership is open to everyone regardless of race. White and Indian South Africans are skeptical

October 24, 1990 – Mandela arouses the anger of  Australian Jewish groups upon his arrival in Canberra, likening Israel to a “terrorist state” and accusing her of “slaughtering defenseless, innocent Arabs”, forgetting his pledge to Slovo, Sharansky and the American jewish organizations he pandered to during his last visit to the States.  He later backtracks after pressure from Joe Slovo, the ANC’s top Jewish leader and self described “brains” behind the African National Congress.

July 14, 1991 – Following U.S. lead, Israel lifts cultural and economic sanctions against  South Africa after four years of crippling economic warfare. Pandering to the South Africans and strong economic and military ties with the black government commences.

April 15, 1992 – On the eve of Passover, Mandela publicly acknowledges South African Jewry’s “particularly outstanding contribution” to his people’s “struggle for freedom and social justice” for the first time. Mandela states that Jewry “sees themselves in black causes” due to the fact Jews have suffered through “one long historical holocaust for more than two thousand years.” He believes that Jews can more easily identify with blacks than Whites and East Indians, the two groups offering the most opposition to the ANC. Thus commences the official “special relationship” between Mandela and his Jewish backers.

May 4, 1992- South Africa’s Jerusalem Club invites Black speaker to address attendees for the first time, helping to forge ties between the Jewish committee and the Mandela-led ANC. From this point forth Mandela is the offical spokesperson for the  “worlds oppressed”.

August 16, 1992 – As South Africa lifts its apartheid law banning suburban settlement by blacks, Mandela moves to the upscale Jewish suburb of Houghton. Mandela’s new neighbor, member of Parliament Tony Leon of the Democratic Party, brought a gift of chocolate cake, which he left with a member of the household staff in Mandela’s absence.

August 1993 – Addressing the annual conferece of  South African Jewish Board of Deputees, Mandela’s greeted by a standing ovation, confirming improved ties following the leader’s prior remarks about the PLO.

March 1994 – With one month to go before South Africa’s first democtratic presidential elections, a JTA report anticipates “Jewish support” for Mandela’s ANC. South African Jews face the country’s first democratic elections on April 27 with a “mixture of fear and faith for the future” in the country. In spite of the fact that Mandela and the ANC’s rise to power would never have been possible without international Jewry’s financial support., South African Jewry aren’t as convinced, empowering the black majority is in fact the right move. The fears among the approximately 100,000 members of the South African Jewish community primarily relate to the widespread increase in criminal violence, particularly in Johannesburg, where over half the country’s Jews live. Blowback has historically impacted Jewry more than any other people. Think of the Jewish led Bolshevik revolution and how that ultimately blew up in their faces. Gulags anyone?

May 2, 1994 – After several days of voting, Mandela elected president in South Africa’s first “all-race” democratic elections; Jewish sentiment is reported to be optimistic. That Saturday, Nelson Mandela attends Shabbat services at the Green & Sea Point Hebrew Congregation in Cape Town, by far the largest synagogue in the Southern hemisphere. From the pulpit, Mandela, Yamulka and all, appeals for the swift return of Jewish expatriates who left for security concerns.

May 12, 1994 – Mandela meets with Israeli President Ezer Weizman before greeting several international Jewish dignitaries at a meeting in Cape Town. PLO leader Yasser Arafat was invited to join them. “He calls Arafat by his first name, Yasser,” Weizman recalled. “They embraced, and he said he and Arafat were brothers. I said: ‘Then, Mr. President, we are cousins.’ More proof the Palestinians and Israelis, at least the Arab and Sephardic Jewish inhabtants of Israel, have more in common than the Ashkenazim let up

June 1994 – Following Mandela’s election, Israel lifts its seven-year arms embargo against South Africa. The original embargo was introduced by Israels hawkish neo conservative Jewish and WASP partners in Washington.

August 1994 – Mandela is awarded Anne Frank Medal (selected by Dutch Jewry) in Amsterdam for his contributions in advancing democracy in South Africa. Later that month, Mandela states, “The victory of the democratic forces in South Africa is a contribution to this worldwide effort to rid humanity of the evil of racism. It is Anne Frank’s victory. It’s for the people of the holocaust. It is an achievement of humanity as a whole,” Invoking the holocaust is becoming as much a trademark for the Zio-schooled Mandela as his extravgant button downed dress shirts.

November 1994 – Israeli professor Michael Wolfsohn reveals that in 1989, Mandela’s release was on the table as part of a large prisoner exchange for missing Israeli soldier Ron Arad until the Berlin Wall fell.

January 5, 1995 – Housing Minister Joe Slovo, the brains behind the ANC, and one of two Jews to become part of the Mandela’s cabinet, dies of bone marrow cancer. The other Jewish cabinet member, Ronnie Kasrils, would prove to be an even more polarizing figure.

February 1995 – South African Foreign Minister Alfred Nzo announces full South African diplomatic relations with the “State of Palestine,” prompting protest from the Israeli officials that had funded the ANC since its inception.. Blacks biting the jewish hand that fed them increasingly wears on the nerves of the ANC’s jewish backers.

October 1995 – Prior to national local elections, Nelson Mandela joins Jewish ANC candidates in an appeal to the Jewish community not to emigrate from South Africa due to fear of crime. In spite of the ANC’s enormous Jewish ties, many of South Africa’s Jewish population  appear to be ruing  the fall of apartheid and fleeing the country by the tens of thousands. Blowback is the quintessential bitch!

January 1996 – Two main South African Jewish organizations with ties to the Black ANC criticize Mandela’s meeting with Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam, famous for anti-Semitic remarks in the U.S. Mandela apologises publicly, with his Jewish handlers in toe.

February 1996 – Chief Rabbi Yirael Meir Lau shares stories of his imprisonment in a concentration camp with Mandela in Pretoria. Mandela equates apartheid with the “holocaust” for the umpteenth time.

September 20, 1996 – A leading Jewish Newspaper publishes a report citing crime as the greatest reason for Jews leaving South Africa. Jewish communities become more withdrawn as their ties to the ANC strengthen. Publicly black and Jewish solidarity is at it’s peak. Privately, Jews; like Indians, Arabs even some members of the “coloured” or mulatto community, are seen as whites by rampaging South African blacks, fear for their lives and embark on a mass exodus from the nation.

September 1997 – Mandela is presented with an honorary doctorate in philosophy from Israel’s, Ben Gurion University. Zionist organization’s award is presented in Cape Town “because Mandela has indicated he will not visit the Mid East until he is able to make a meaningful contribution to the peace process.”

April 1998 – Mandela appoints Richard Goldstone, a renowned Jewish egal scholar and jurist,  to investigate an alleged high-level plot to overthrow the country’s government involving Mandela’s former wife and several of his former “colleagues”.

July 18, 1998 – The country celebrates the president’s 80th birthday. Mandela also throws secret “wedding celebration”, letting Chief Rabbi Cyril Harris in on the secret a day early in a special ceremony. The ceremony has an  “Afro-Jewish” theme to it.

August 12, 1998 – Mandela and Arafat exchange medals and embrace in a ceremony. Jewish leaders are bemused. seems Mandela still doesn’t get it.

January 1999 –Mandela is a  frequent celebrity bar mitzvah guest at high profile Jewish bar mitzvahs in South Africa.

October 19, 1999 – Mandela arrives in Israel, his adopted homeland, for the first time. Jewish and newly empowered black South Africans anticipate that their president’s visit will yield better relations between the two nations. Having recently visited Iran, Syria, Jordan the backdrop of Iran holding thirteen Jewish prisoners as alleged spies, Mandela agrees to mediate between Israel and her neighbors, stating, “”I cannot conceive of Israel withdrawing if Arab states do not recognize Israel within secure borders.”Mandela is now officially Israels, b*&^%.

February 2000 – Following his presidency, Mandela is named patron in chief of Tikkun, a private Jewish-controlled social services project founded in 1996 providig interracial adult education, skills training and AIDS relief work. Although the agency is privately managed, it is subsidised by the new ANC government.

December 13, 2000 – Mandela is key speaker at opening ceremony of the new South African Jewish Museum.

January 2002 – In Durban, Mandela retracts statements supporting the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan and comments labeling Osama bin Laden a terrorist, upsetting the Jewish community. Although the Jews are a “peace loving folk”, international Jewry openly supports the war on terror and the millions of deaths its caused worldwide.

May 2002- Lazar Sidelsky, a Jewish lawyer who’d given a young Nelson Mandela a job as a clerk in the face of apartheid restrictions, dies in Johannesburg at age 90.

October 2002 –Wolfie Kodesh, Jewish founder of the armed wing of the ANC and former member of the South African Communist party, dies at age 84. Kodesh is praised by Mandela at his funeral in Cape Town. Mandela is a key speaker at the ceremony

December 2003  – Union of Orthodox Rabbis taps new chief rabbi, Warren Goldstein, 32, to succeed Harris in January 2005. Goldstein co-authored a book with Mandela’s grandson, Dumani. Links abound!

August 2004 – Chief Rabbi Cyril Harris accuses the country’s Jews of not sufficiently supporting MaAfrika Tikkun, the community’s privately run but publicly funded outreach initiative. “There’s an unfortunate reluctance, a sort of suspicion about interacting with the black majority — particularly on the part of the older generation — which is absurd,” he said, noting “a kind of restraint” when it comes to non-Jewish causes.

April 2004 – Top  Israeli paper celebrates Jewish and ANC partnership in “rebuilding” South Africa. The new ANC created constitutional court — headed by a Jew, Chief Justice Arthur Chaskalson is touted as the nation’s greatest achievement. The JTA writes that “After some years of demoralization, the Jewish community recently has begun to rebound. It has placed in key leadership positions young, dynamic people who are less burdened by the baggage of apartheid and who are vigorously engaging with symbols of the new South Africa.” It profiles Yehuda Kay, 28, national director of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies; Zev Krengel, 31, chairman of the board’s Johannesburg area council; Avrom Krengel, 35, chair of the South African Zionist Federation; Rabbi Craig Kacev, 32, acting director of the South African Board of Jewish Education; and Warren Goldstein, 32, recently chosen as the country’s chief rabbi.

September 2004 – A review of a book about Zimbabwe by Abe Abrahamson — honorary life president of South African Zionist Federation — mentions that Abrahamson was one of six high profile Jews to visit Nelson Mandela upon the latter’s release from prison.

September 13, 2005 – Former Chief Rabbi Cyril Harris dies of cancer at age 69, and was remembered for offering a prayer at Mandela’s inauguration in 1994.

January 2008 – Anti-apartheid activist Helen Suzman, who visited Mandela in prison on several occasions, and was instrumental in the fall of apartheid, dies.

White and East Indian African Genocide continues.

by Jack Sen

Source

Karl Marx: Racist Supremacist, Enemy of Humanity & Hypocrite

Visit ResistanceRadio.tv Today!

Can we shake the Coronavirus to death? New Way to Kill Viruses: Shake Them to Death

Hidden knowledge, alternative healing, big pharma

Why couldn’t I find follow ups on this subject?

Royal Raymond Rife began researching on this subject in 1920.

It is widely accepted that, in 1920, Royal R Rife began his experiments using electronic frequencies on viruses and bacteria. Previous to that time, microbes were invisible, but using his own powerful microscopes, he was able to see them.


Can we shake the Coronavirus to death?

(Difficult because Big Pharma wants vaccines & drugs which is more lucrative for them)


New Way to Kill Viruses: Shake Them to Death

By  

3D model coronavirus

Scientists may one day be able to destroy viruses in the same way that opera singers presumably shatter wine glasses. New research mathematically determined the frequencies at which simple viruses could be shaken to death. 
“The capsid of a virus is something like the shell of a turtle,” said physicist Otto Sankey of Arizona State University. “If the shell can be compromised [by mechanical vibrations], the virus can be inactivated.” 
 

“Experiments must just try a wide variety of conditions and hope that conditions are found that can lead to success,” Sankey told LiveScience.

To expedite this search, Sankey and his student Eric Dykeman have developed a way to calculate the vibrational motion of every atom in a virus shell. From this, they can determine the lowest resonant frequencies. 
As an example of their technique, the team modeled the satellite tobacco necrosis virus and found this small virus resonates strongly around 60 Gigahertz (where one Gigahertz is a billion cycles per second), as reported in the Jan. 14 issue of Physical Review Letters.
A virus’ death knell
All objects have resonant frequencies at which they naturally oscillate. Pluck a guitar string and it will vibrate at a resonant frequency.
But resonating can get out of control. A famous example is the Tacoma Narrows Bridge, which warped and finally collapsed in 1940 due to a wind that rocked the bridge back and forth at one of its resonant frequencies. 
Viruses are susceptible to the same kind of mechanical excitation. An experimental group led by K. T. Tsen from Arizona State University have recently shown that pulses of laser light can induce destructive vibrations in virus shells. 
“The idea is that the time that the pulse is on is about a quarter of a period of a vibration,” Sankey said. “Like pushing a child on a swing from rest, one impulsive push gets the virus shaking.” 
It is difficult to calculate what sort of push will kill a virus, since there can be millions of atoms in its shell structure. A direct computation of each atom’s movements would take several hundred thousand Gigabytes of computer memory, Sankey explained. 

He and Dykeman have found a method to calculate the resonant frequencies with much less memory. 

In practice
The team plans to use their technique to study other, more complicated viruses. However, it is still a long way from using this to neutralize the viruses in infected people.
One challenge is that laser light cannot penetrate the skin very deeply. But Sankey imagines that a patient might be hooked up to a dialysis-like machine that cycles blood through a tube where it can be hit with a laser. Or perhaps, ultrasound can be used instead of lasers. 
These treatments would presumably be safer for patients than many antiviral drugs that can have terrible side-effects. Normal cells should not be affected by the virus-killing lasers or sound waves because they have resonant frequencies much lower than those of viruses, Sankey said. 
Moreover, it is unlikely that viruses will develop resistance to mechanical shaking, as they do to drugs. 
“This is such a new field, and there are so few experiments, that the science has not yet had sufficient time to prove itself,” Sankey said. “We remain hopeful but remain skeptical at the same time.”


Learn About a New Flu Fighter

George Hunt – The New World Bank, Religion, and Rulers 1987

George Hunt became aware of the environmental fraud after attending the Wilderness Conference in Colorado in 1987.

From then until his death Dec 23rd 2013 George dedicated himself to exposing the environmental fraud, masterminded by Maurice Strong and his boss, Baron Edmund de Rothschild.

Video The Oven

Video TheirTube

Website The Bernician

If you are interested in knowing who, how and why the plans for ‘sustainable development’ were founded and by whom, look no further than George’s courageous expose.

The Big Bad Bank
The expose documentary by George Washington Hunt of a secret bank created over the past 25 years.

The Big Bad Bank – Intro
The Big Bad Bank Intro George Washington Hunt introduces us to the World Conservation Bank. Mr. Hunt also explains his background and how he discovered the plan for this bank. One of the handouts included the Brundtland Report “Our Common Future” as well George reveals what the bank will need to get it’s feet off the ground.

The Big Bad Bank – Responsibility to Educate
The Big Bad Bank by George Washington Hunt, in this part he goes further into his background on how he assumed the vast education responsibility to educate us about the World Conservation Bank. We listen to the voice of David Lang, and elitist who tells us how the common people shouldn’t be told about this bank. Then we look at the wilderness inventory and what the US stands to lose as part of conservation projects that the bank will control. George Hunt goes into further explanation of how the Rich Evil Elitists are like and what they will own and how they can handle things.

The Big Bad Bank – Your Educator
The Big Bad Bank – George Washington Hunt is your educator, it’s his goal to educate millions of people about this bank. George also points out that the banks requiring bailouts should not have been saved and cost the tax payers dearly. The Big Bad Bank or The World Conservation Bank was formed at the 4th World Wilderness Congress in Estes Park in September 1987, the bank could be capitalized by the shares of stock and trusts of the members. The big problems are that the currency unit will rise to high, prices will skyrocket, and the worst part is that the bank will purposely go bust and all of the assets will be left in the hands of the shareholders in this bank. Also in this part of the video we hear from Baron Edmond James de Rothschild about technologies that the bank will use to ultimately come to its demise.

The Big Bad Bank – Conservation
The Big Bad Bank – George Washington Hunt tells us how he was selected as an official host at the 4th World Wilderness Congress. Thinking it was an environmental event he attended but his attention was shifted to bank matters, some of the people George met were the international bankers including David Rockefeller, Baron Edmond James de Rothschild, the Prime Minister of Norway Gro Harlem Brundtland and Maurice Strong.

The Big Bad Bank – Greed and Power
The Big Bad Bank – This section focus on Greed and Power of the largest international bankers, the most famous was J.P. Morgan. George Washington Hunt’s Great Grandfather, Also GW Hunt, was building a railroad, at the same time Edward Henry Harriman was also building a railroad in the same direction and Harriman was able to go to JP Morgan for funds to continue his railroad and beat GW Hunt to the pass because he had the money to do so. More on the rich and powerful we get a little history on the Rothschild family as well as the Rockefeller family. “The custodian of the Planet” Maurice Strong is also a big player in the politics of this bank. Strong was working to take water from the San Luis Valley in Colorado and sell it at high profit margins to other cities in the US.

The Big Bad Bank – Reviewing the Scenario
The Big Bad Bank – Reviewing the Scenario, George Washington Hunt reminds us of what is involved with this bank and how they plan on making a whole lot of money by doing things such as those of Maurice Strong and how he was planning on destroying the wilderness in the San Luis Valley of Colorado but at the same time was also working as an environmentalists with the big investors in this Big Bad Bank. We also hear the voice of Maurice Strong speaking about this conservation bank and introducing Baron Edmond de Rothschild.

The Big Bad Bank – The Rich Elite
The Big Bad Bank – Here we see an article about David Rockefeller and William Ruckleshaus speaking about this bank, we also learn more about the Rothschild family, Nathan Rothschild had inside knowledge of the outcome of Battle of Waterloo in the war of 1816 and was able to quickly turn the events out in his favor and wound up owning the Bank of England overnight. One possible solution to turning this Big Bad Bank over to good has would be if the G-77 Countries of the world took charge and hired the best talent, rather than a private bank which could turn on the people.

The Big Bad Bank – Closing Statements
The Big Bad Bank – Bailouts, One big Bad Bank and more problems that America has, including the debt to the Federal Reserve. John F Kennedy tried to solve America’s problem with the Federal Reserve by having more money printed, but that’s a whole other theory. Wrapping up the show and quickly touching on what George Washington Hunt has presented to us in this video as well as a few last points about current events and theories about expensive and harmful environment projects.

Source

Governments and Biowarfare: A Brief History by James Corbett

James Corbett
The Corbett Report

1 May, 2009

As questions continue to mount about the origins of the mysterious Mexican flu which is pushing the world into mass hysteria, some are noting that its genetic fingerprint suggests it was created in a laboratory while those who are tracking the small number of confirmed deaths from the outbreak—all of the victims so far being Mexican nationals—are questioning if this is a race-specific bioweapon. While some in the controlled corporate media dismiss such inquiry out of hand, serious researchers know that there is a long and well-documented history of governments experimenting with, deploying and even creating bioweapons to use as a means of warfare, population control and consolidation of governmental power.

Biowarfare itself goes back to the earliest periods of recorded human history. The ancient Hittites over 3000 years ago drove plague victims into enemy lands with the intent of infecting the enemy population. Athenians poisoned the water supply of their enemies in Kirrha with a toxic plant called hellebore sometime around 590 BC. Scythians in 4th century BC learned to smear their arrow tips with snake venom, blood and even animal feces in order to infect their enemy’s wounds. In the 18th century, the British commander Lord Amherst famously wrote about a plan to infect Native Americans by giving them smallpox-infected blankets, and researcher Kevin Annett has documented similar actions by the Canadian government, which acted in coordination with the Catholic, Anglican and United churches in Canada’s residential school system to facilitate the genocide of Canadian natives.

Of course, as science began to make progress in understanding and manipulating naturally occurring biological agents, so too did biowarfare become more deadly. The modern age of biowarfare began in earnest in WWI, with the Germans beginning to use anthrax as a stealth weapon against key targets in enemy countries. Accords such as the Geneva Protocol of 1925 attempted to prohibit the use of biowarfare, but that didn’t stop any of the major powers, including the Germans, the Japanese, the Americans, the Canadians or the British from pursuing biowarfare capabilities. The excuse was always that these biowarfare programs were merely for defensive purposes, but of course there is no material difference between a defensive and an offensive biowarfare program.

The American government’s approach to biowarfare is notable for its unabashed use of unwitting American citizens as guinea pigs in biological weapons research. The very people who helped establish the U.S. biological weapons programs openly bragged about their experiments on unwitting human test subjects. Dr. Cornelius Rhoads, who founded the U.S. Army Biological Warfare facilities in Maryland, Utah and Panama purposefully infected test subjects with cancer cells while in the employ of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Investigations. He later wrote letters about the tests. With that as a starting point for the American bioweapons research program, what follows is a list of experimental horrors too long to reproduce, but which includes:

  – 1932: The Tuskegee Syphilis Study begins. 200 black men diagnosed with syphilis are never told of their illness, are denied treatment, and instead are used as human guinea pigs in order to follow the progression and symptoms of the disease. They all subsequently die from syphilis, their families never told that they could have been treated. Follow this link for more info.

  – 1950: In an experiment to determine how susceptible an American city would be to biological attack, the U.S. Navy sprays a cloud of bacteria from ships over San Franciso. Monitoring devices are situated throughout the city in order to test the extent of infection. Many residents become ill with pneumonia-like symptoms. Follow this link for more info.

  – 1955: The CIA, in an experiment to test its ability to infect human populations with biological agents, releases a bacteria withdrawn from the Army’s biological warfare arsenal over Tampa Bay, Fl. Follow this link for more info.

  – 1956: U.S. military releases mosquitoes infected with Yellow Fever over Savannah, Ga and Avon Park, Fl. Following each test, Army agents posing as public health officials test victims for effects. Follow this link for more info.

  – 1965: Prisoners at the Holmesburg State Prison in Philadelphia are subjected to dioxin, the highly toxic chemical component of Agent Orange used in Viet Nam. The men are later studied for development of cancer, which indicates that Agent Orange had been a suspected carcinogen all along. Follow this link for more info.

  – 1966: U.S. Army dispenses Bacillus subtilis variant niger throughout the New York City subway system. More than a million civilians are exposed when army scientists drop lightbulbs filled with the bacteria onto ventilation grates. Follow this link for more info.

  – 1990: More than 1500 six-month old black and Hispanic babies in Los Angeles are given an “experimental” measles vaccine that had never been licensed for use in the United States. CDC later admits that parents were never informed that the vaccine being injected to their children was experimental. Follow this link for more info.

  – 1994: With a technique called “gene tracking,” Dr. Garth Nicolson at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, TX discovers that many returning Desert Storm veterans are infected with an altered strain of Mycoplasma incognitus, a microbe commonly used in the production of biological weapons. Incorporated into its molecular structure is 40 percent of the HIV protein coat, indicating that it had been man-made. Follow this link for more info.

As horrifying as these admitted tests of biological weapons on unwitting subjects are, perhaps even more frightening is the knowledge that governments have a documented history of using biological agents against their own citizens in bioterror false flag operations. It is no coincidence that two of the most well-known and devastating biological releases this decade have traced back to Fort Detrick (the home of the U.S. biological weapons research program since the 1950s and the current home of USAMRIID) and Porton Down (Fort Detrick’s British equivalent). 

In the late Winter of 2001, an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease ravaged the British farming industry, requiring the government-mandated destruction of millions of animals. The losses to British farmers were nearly incalculable with a number of cases of farmers ending their own lives in anguish over their loss of livelihood. In April of 2001, the Sunday Express reported that the outbreak came just months after an audit of Porton Down—a top secret government bioweapons research facility housing such agents as TB, anthrax and smallpox—found that phials containing foot-and-mouth samples were missing from the lab. Authorities tried to play down the report by suggesting that “animal rights activists” had stolen and released the samples from the maximum security government laboratory. Authorities failed to explain why animal rights activists would be interested in releasing a biological agent that would result in the destruction of millions of animals, or how they were able to penetrate the multiple layers of defenses in the heavily defended laboratory.

Just months later, anthrax-laced letters began to show up in the offices of the Bush Administration’s most vocal media opponents and political rivals in the U.S. The administration and their puppets in the corporate-controlled media immediately began to theorize that the anthrax used in the letters was a crude concotion that an Al-Qaeda operative could have mixed in a bathtub. It later emerged that these anthrax spores were in fact the most sophisticated weaponized form of the deadly plague ever seen and the particular strain used in its production was traced back to Fort Detrick. It later emerged that key members of the Bush Administration had been on Cipro, the anti-anthrax drug, since the morning of 9/11. The entire story of the anthrax investigation is lengthy and convoluted, but extremely important for a better understanding of false flag bioterrorism.

Of course, these are only the well-known examples from the past decade, but naturally there are others (including the 2007 foot-and-mouth outbreak in England, which was also found to come from a government lab). Even worse than these examples is the knowledge that the types of bioweapons that governments around the world have been developing far outstrip anthrax or foot-and-mouth in sophistication and effectiveness. Although the full extent of American bioweapons research remains classified, it is public knowledge that the American military was already experimenting with race-specific bioweapons at least since 1970, a technology that the Apartheid South African government was known to possess and which Israel was developing last decade. It does not take much imagination to envision why those two governments would have been interested in the technology, but it may be surprising to learn that the American government has not only been developing race-specific bioweapons, but that key government officials have advocated their use as a way of furthering American foreign policy. In September 2000 a neocon think-tank called Project for a New American Century released a policy paper, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses”, that contained the following chilling quotation: “advanced forms of biological warfare that can “target” specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.” Prominent PNAC members included Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Jeb Bush and Scooter Libby.

Given all of the foregoing, the suggestion that the current flu pandemic may in fact be a government-engineered race-specific bioweapon is not only plausible, but the first possibility that any rational investigator would consider when examining the never before seen flu strain which only seems to be killing Mexicans. The natural question at this point is not whether the government could do such a thing, but why they would do such a thing.

Naturally, governments deploy biological agents for a number of different reasons. The 2001 foot-and-mouth outbreak ushered in a new era of internationally-standardized farming procedures and guidelines in the name of ‘food safety’ and the protection of trade interests, ultimately leading to such Orwellian programs as the National Animal Identification System (which is now being administered in other countries under different names). The 2001 anthrax attack not only helped to silence Bush media critics and Democrats who showed any sign of resisting the Bush Administration’s “War on Terror” policies, but it also ensured the passage of the Patriot Act, which was rushed through Congress as the height of the anthrax scare before anyone even had a chance to read it.

So if this new flu is indeed a bioweapon, and if it has been released on purpose, the question remains: What motive would a western government have for this release, especially considering the new flu now threatens the entire globe? The answers to that question are numerous, but can be located in such things as the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, as well as the precedent-setting consolidation of power in the hands of agencies like the WHO during this crisis. The Corbett Report will be covering these possible motives behind the attack in a series of forthcoming articles, but for now readers are advised to further familiarize themselves with the concept of false flag bioterror by listening to Episode 060 of The Corbett Report.

Episode 060 – A bioterror false flag

Right click and “save as” to download the mp3 or listen directly.

Source

Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison II: Deconstruction Of The Myth

December 15, 2010

by Jonathan Azaziah 

Notice of Use

All articles, poetry and lyrics are the copywritten property of Jonathan Azaziah. Websites and individuals can post the written works of Jonathan Azaziah as long as they provide the name of Jonathan Azaziah and a link to http://www.maskofzion.com.

About Me

Source

Not since Zionist warmonger Barack Obama’s ‘ascension’ to the US presidency, has there been such a hysteria in the anti-war/anti-Zionist community as there is with Julian Assange and his organization, Wikileaks. Just like Obama, whose smooth-talker persona duped millions of awakened individuals, lulling them into a false sense of security with lies and trickery, Wikileaks has pulled the wool over the eyes of average people and distinguished activists and writers alike with its ‘whistleblower’ image. Even after Obama’s Zionist roots were exposed, in which powerful pro-Israel figures like Abner Mikva, Joel Sprayregen, Newton Minow, Bettylu Saltzman of the dynastic Saltzman family, Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf, Lester Crown of the vastly wealthy Crown household and Penny Pritzker of the Pritzker dynasty nurtured his rise to political stardom in Chicago (1), the current puppet of the Zionist entity was no less supported and no less loved by his starry-eyed followers. 
After Obama was designated the democratic ‘candidate’ for president, he delivered a speech at AIPAC and announced to his masters that the United States has an ‘unshakeable commitment to Israel’s security (2).’ Still, the opinions of his followers remained unchanged. And not even after Obama maintained utter silence during Operation Cast Lead (3), in which the usurping Tel Aviv regime murdered 1,440 innocent Palestinians in illegally besieged and occupied Gaza, including 431 children, did his legions of drones realize that the slogans of hope and change they so vehemently believed in, were really just smoke and mirrors. Only recently, due to Obama spreading the Zionist Bush administration’s ‘Project for a New American Century’ to Yemen, expanding the murderous drone strikes in Pakistan, as well as increasing the genocides in occupied Iraq and occupied Afghanistan, have some of his once seemingly mind-controlled supporters snapped out of their trance. Plenty of them still continue their blindness however.
Assange and Wikileaks make the Zionist-fueled Obama hype look minuscule; like rain drops in an ocean. Wikileaks, touted and fully endorsed by the Zionist media, has become the peak of resistance and dissidence. The greatest whistleblower in the history of whistleblowing. Assange has been elevated to god status, eclipsing rock stars and movie stars. Wikileaks cannot be questioned. Assange cannot be investigated. Everything the organization does is for the good of the people, and everything Assange says is absolute 100% fact. 
Though it may come as a shock to those who have bought into the absurdity of Wikileaks, everything aforementioned is a morbid delusion. Wikileaks is no whistleblower. Assange is no hero. And the leaks, which have been hailed across the globe, aren’t even leaks. Wikileaks isn’t just toxic Zionist poison, it is a full-blown US-Zionist intelligence operation.

Wikileaks isn’t the first example of Zionist foreknowledge.

Israeli Foreknowledge and Arrogance

One day after the World Trade Center was demolished with military-grade thermite explosives, mass murderer of Gaza Benjamin Netanyahu told the Zionist-owned New York Times that the 9/11 attacks were ‘very good’ for US-Israeli relations, and that they would generate immediate sympathy for the Zionist entity (4). One year after Netanyahu made these audacious declarations, he delivered a speech to the US House of Representatives, laying out reasons why the obliteration of Iraq is necessary for the survival of Israel (5). In 2008, the Zionist war criminal delivered a speech to an Israeli university, reiterating his comments about the Mossad false flag on 9/11, as well as stating that his regime is benefitting from the ‘American struggle in Iraq (6).’As recent as July of this year, Netanyahu has publicly declared that any withdrawal from Iraq will leave the Tel Aviv regime vulnerable to ‘renewed hostilities (7).’
Netanyahu continued this pattern of arrogant behavior with Wikileaks, by revealing that the usurping entity had prior knowledge to the organization’s upcoming leaks on the day that ‘Cablegate’ began, just hours before the release (8). Netanyahu stated that the Zionist entity wouldn’t be the ‘center of international attention.’ The following day, Netanyahu reaffirmed this revelation by stating that Israel ‘wasn’t harmed at all;’ a senior official in his Zionist administration also said that ‘we come out looking very good (9).’ On the same day, former national security advisors to butcher of Lebanon Ehud Olmert and Sabra and Shatilah massacre architect Ariel Sharon boasted that ‘Israel benefits from these leaks (10).’ Israel’s Finance Minister, Yuval Steinitz, when asked about the leaks on Israel Radio, said that he ‘doesn’t see damage. Quite the opposite (11).’ Israeli mouthpiece newspapers emboldened the statements of their murderous leaders, with one opining that ‘had Wikileaks not existed, Israel would have had to invent it (12).’ This statement in particular will prove not only to be devilishly ironic, but another example of Israeli foreknowledge. 
While nations all over the world, nations of Resistance and nations of oppression alike, scrambled to defend themselves from the Wikileaks onslaught, several officials of the illegitimate Zionist state, including the prime minister himself, openly affirmed the impregnableness of Israel. No damage, a bounty of satisfaction and a plethora of benefits. The questions are simple: If the Zionist entity isn’t behind Wikileaks, how did its officials know it wouldn’t become the subject of international media scrutiny? If Wikileaks wasn’t protecting the Zionist agenda, why would Israeli officials intransigently say their illegal occupying entity remained unharmed after the leaks? And if in fact Israel is operating Wikileaks, then the Zionist media’s depictions of Assange and his crew as whistleblowers are monstrously false, aren’t they? Logic and common sense should guide all to the blatant, blue and white six-pointed-star-shaped answers.

 

Red Mafiya Don Semion Mogilevich

is left out of Cablegate deliberately.

 

Cablegate Fraud I: The Obviousness

Like the Afghan War Diary and the Iraq War Logs which mixed Zionist hasbara with facts about American and British war crimes, Wikileaks’ Cablegate documents mix truths with Zionist lies to maximize the potential of the disinformation campaign. And like the previous leaks, the truths that are released are examples that were revealed and reported on by activists and journalists alike long before Wikileaks was relentlessly and aggressively force-fed to the masses by the Zionist media. 
Included are shockers like Israel attempted to coordinate its Operation Cast Lead assault on illegally blockaded Gaza with traitorous Palestinian collaborationist Mahmoud Abbas and the brutal Zionist dictator of Egypt, Hosni Mubarak (13). Revelations like Ali Abdullah Saleh, US-Saudi puppet president of Yemen, covered up US air strikes that murdered children (14). Discoveries like the US is waging a ‘secret’ war inside Pakistan (15). Eye-openers like a Lebanese official offering advice to the Zionist entity on how to trample the Lebanese Resistance movement, Hezbollah (16), or the US flying spy missions over Lebanon from its Diego Garcia base (17). Or quite possibly the largest and most apocalyptic divulgement: the Israeli mafia exists prominently within the illegitimate usurping entity, and is a very, very dangerous group (18). How incredibly overwhelming. The name of Assange’s putrid organization should be Wikiobviousness, not Wikileaks. 
Mahmoud Abbas has been exposed over and over again as a treasonist to the Palestinian people since he became an integral part of Middle Eastern politics, or more accurately, the Zionist Power Configuration. Since 2005, Abbas’s Palestinian ‘Authority’ has been cooperating with the Zionist entity through ‘security coordination (19),’ which links the two illegitimate powers to a crackdown on all elements that support Resistance to Zionism. Despite denial after denial by Abbas himself and his spokespersons, he finally admitted to this filthy collaboration in March of this year (20). Israel and Mubarak’s regime have transferred weapons to Abbas, and the US has given Fatah hundreds of millions of dollars in aid to undermine Palestinian Resistance, chiefly Hamas, and to strengthen the Zionist stranglehold on occupied Palestine (21). Mahmoud Abbas has deep financial ties to Tel Aviv, which also amounts to hundreds of millions of dollars given to Fatah by the Israeli government yearly (22). Wikileaks wasn’t needed for this; anyone that is simply capable of reading is well-aware that Abbas is a disgrace to the Palestinian people and a total puppet of the Zionist entity.
Ali Abdullah Saleh is a traitor to the Yemeni people; like Abbas, this has been known for decades. He sold Yemen to the Anglo-American oil agenda, and then solidified the sellout by entering into billion dollar slave-agreements with the Zionist-infested World Bank and IMF (23). Saleh is a habitual recipient of the American oppressor’s aid money (24), and as of January of this year, he’s been receiving this blood money on an even greater scale (25). He has used these funds along with money from the House of Saud to wage a brutal war against the Resistance of southern Yemen (26). The US dropped cluster bombs on Yemen in December of 2009, and it was well reported in the alternative media sphere; this murderous attack claimed the lives of 120 innocents and wounded 40 others (27), not 41 as Assange’s organization erroneously reports. Telling the world that American bombs kill civilians is like telling someone that the sky is blue or that the sun is hot. There was no need for ‘whistleblowing’ on this matter. 
Yemen is Zion’s newest target; sickeningly pro-Israel war criminal Joe Lieberman called for preemptive strikes against the Arab nation last year in late December (28), and Obama’s Zionist administration obliged by increasing its illegal military presence inside the country (29). Despite wide-ranged reporting in the Zionist media and the anti-Zionist media, Ali Abdullah Saleh continued his role as a stooge, and denied the presence of America inside Yemen (30). Now, Obama and his gang of criminals have set forth a plan for an even larger military mobilization which will be followed by an occupation (31). In addition, Mossad is carrying out assassinations and other terrorist operations against the Yemeni Resistance in the south (32). Don’t expect to see any of this information in the Cablegate documents though; Wikileaks must protect Israel at all costs.
The CIA has been conducting a war with its murderous predator drones against Pakistan since 2004 (33), and it has been doing so from Pakistani bases thanks to one criminal administration after another (34). 90% of the people murdered by these CIA drones are civilians (35), and these attacks occur close to every single day (36). It was reported in 2008 (37), and in February of 2010 (38), that US Special Forces were engaging in terrorism on the ground in Pakistan. Wikileaks didn’t ‘reveal’ anything about a ‘secret war’ inside the Islamic Republic; it stated a fact that could’ve been reiterated by anyone with a slight interest in geopolitics. 
The real secret war against Pakistan is that which is being conducted by Israel and the Hindutva entity of India. Since the late 1980s, Zionism and Hindutva have signed military agreements and performed covert operations to destroy Pakistan’s nuclear program (39). In 2001, Mossad and RAW created four new agencies to target important personalities in the fields of law, defense, politics and religion, with the hopes of creating all out ‘sectarian’ chaos within Pakistan (40). Codenamed the ‘Dragon Policy,’ Mossad and RAW agents hired mercenaries, druglords and mafia figures to unleash the de-stabilization process (41). Indian and Israeli intelligence have coordinated a string of car bombings with Xe (Blackwater) cells across the Islamic Republic (42), including the massive blast that claimed more than 100 lives in Peshawar, a Mossad stronghold (43), in 2009 (44). 
Hezbollah Secretary General, his eminence, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, has never been bashful about exposing pro-Zionist politicians in Lebanon, with his most recent slashing of the collaborators taking place during a historic speech for Martyrs’ Day (45). While Elias al-Murr has denied the allegations set forth by the Wikileaks PSYOP (46), he is merely and pathetically attempting to save face; it is a well-known fact that the vile Fouad Siniora government (which al-Murr was a part of) tried to disarm Hezbollah and disconnect the Resistance’s telecommunications network on behalf of the Zionist regime and the US (47). Siniora and his goons failed miserably as Hezbollah persevered and triumphed. 
It is also a well known fact that the US conducts spying and military operations, primarily against occupied Iraq and the Islamic Republic of Iran (48), from Diego Garcia; the Indian Ocean territory turned into a military compound by British and American occupiers who have malevolently ethnically cleansed the entire indigenous population (49). On a side note, this evil of course isn’t mentioned by Wikileaks. The mentioning of a few previously known American spy missions in Lebanon is nothing more than a cover for the massive Zionist creature in the room: Israel is notorious for its spy missions in Lebanon, as it has violated Lebanese airspace well over 7,000 times since its crushing defeat at the hands of Hezbollah in the summer of 2006 (50). 
Failing to mention Zionist activity in Lebanon is the equivalent of failing to mention the stars in the sky at nightfall. The Lebanese Resistance and the Lebanese Army have arrested at least 141 Israeli spies since April of last year (51), in the telecommunications, security and military sectors. The Zionist entity infiltrated Alfa, one of Lebanon’s two telecom companies, and used the penetrated network against Hezbollah in the 2006 war (52). Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah exposed the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri as a Mossad operation (53), and in an unsuspected but typical display of arrogance, Israel admitted to benefitting greatly from the murder (54). Tel Aviv had distanced itself from the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL), which is backed by the US (55), as well as the UK (56), but the genocidal maniac Avigdor Lieberman finally confirmed what had been known in Lebanon since the Tribunal’s inception: Israel is heavily contributing to it (57). 
The STL is not only a plot to eliminate Hezbollah, but to completely fragment Lebanon; it should come as no surprise then, that it was designed by Zionist Congressman Howard Berman and the powerful Israeli Lobby group, AIPAC (58). Sayyed Nasrallah uncovered that all of the information collected by the STL ends up in the hands of the usurping Zionist regime (59); it is essentially another Israeli spying operation. The Sayyed also revealed that Israel had not only penetrated Alfa, but all of Lebanon’s telecommunications; the Zionist regime is capable of cloning SIM cards, planting phone numbers, duplicating billing data and making phone calls without the phone-owner’s knowledge (60). Just days ago, Hezbollah telecommunications experts unearthed Israeli spying devices near the southern city of Tyre; when the Zionist entity’s cover was blown, the devices were detonated (61). Not even an inkling of any of this information will be made readily available by treacherous Wikileaks because its purpose is to protect Israeli interests. And at the top of the list of those interests, is to colonize Lebanon, especially the south, as part of Greater Israel (62). 
On the surface, it would seem that the revelations about the influence of Israeli organized crime (OC) within the Zionist settler state are groundbreaking; frightening and shocking even. But further analysis of the cable in question displays more of the same: a repetition of previously known information crossbred with odious lies to form a highly effective damage control operation. It was reported across the Middle East, as well as in Zionist-owned Western media that Israeli mob boss Yaakov Alperon was assassinated in 2008 (63), as was the intransigence of Israeli mafia stalwart Zeev Rosenstein, who was arrested in 2004 for the distribution of unfathomable amounts of ecstasy (64). It was also already known that the new generation of Israeli gangsters were receiving training in the fields of assassination and ordnance during their service in IOF (65). These cases of obviousness however do not vindicate Wikileaks but condemn it in an even harsher manner due to the propaganda also contained within the cable. 
The cable states ‘It is not entirely clear to what extent OC elements have penetrated the Israeli establishment and corrupt public officials.’ What an obscene falsification; since the 1980s, the Israeli mafia has exerted a gargantuan amount of control over the occupying government in Tel Aviv, coordinating this corruption from New York City and the streets of occupied Palestine (66). The cable also portrays Zionist war criminal Ehud Olmert in a positive light, saying that Olmert called emergency meetings in response to the public safety concerns and promised to add 1,000 officers to the current efforts ‘combating’ organized crime. Another sham; Olmert is a criminal that is incessantly connected to the Israeli mafia (67). Olmert has been charged with corruption regarding Bank Leumi (68), whom notorious blood-diamond dealer Lev Leviev has a major stake in (69). Leviev is deeply connected to organized crime, due to his business ties with Russian-Israeli oligarch and mobster Roman Abramovich (70). 
Quite possibly the most laughable excerpt of all in the entire cable is this statement: ‘Little is known about the full extent of Russian criminal activity in Israel.’ The Israeli mafia IS the Russian-Jewish mafia. The two cannot be separated; like the illegitimate Israeli state and Zionism. The cable also says Arab criminals routinely collaborate with Russian-Israeli crime families. This is erroneous; an attempt to divide the blame equally amongst Arabs and Israelis. The Red Mafiya (Russian Mob) is intensely racist and territorial, collaborating with noone but other Russian factions in their quest for criminal dominance. The Russian criminals not only poured into Israel after the Soviet Union was dissolved, they were invited by the Zionist entity’s government to start their lives anew (71). 
The most powerful gangster in the world, and don of the Russian-Israeli mafia, Semion Mogilevich has his headquarters in Israel (72); his net worth is well over one billion dollars (73), wielding a criminal empire that involves human trafficking, drug dealing, arms peddling, nuclear materials smuggling and blood diamonds. Marat Balagula, another immensely powerful Russian-Jewish gangster made his home in the Zionist entity after leaving the Soviet Union. Balagula’s empire includes gas fraud, credit card fraud, and the usual elements of drugs, illegal weaponry and prostitution, along with ownership of diamond mines in Sierra Leone. Russian-Israeli organized crime, the Organizatsiya, cannot be talked about without mentioning these two prominent figures. It is no surprise that Wikileaks conveniently leaves their names out of the ‘leaks.’ Also left out of the cables is the most damning information about the Red Mafiya of all: unlike Italian-American mobsters, Russian-Jewish mobsters cannot be touched by US intelligence and local law enforcement, for fear of being hammered and character-assassinated by the Zionist lobby for exercising anti-Semitism (74). 
The power of the Red Mafiya was exposed by the late Robert Friedman, a journalist who began investigating the Russian-Jewish criminal gang in 1989 (75), and who wrote a monumental book about their exploits more than a decade ago. His work brought the nonstop heat of Russian-Jewish OC on top of his head, receiving several threats by high-ranking gangsters (76). Despite media reports of him dying of a rare disease he contracted while on an investigative mission in Bombay (Mumbai), all evidence points to the brave Mr. Friedman being poisoned by Mogilevich’s associates (77). Just like Assange, right? 
The destruction of the Wikileaks cables in this section provides clear proof of what Assange’s group actually is: a ‘Limited Hang Out’ operation. Limited Hang Out ops are used by intelligence agencies to deliver well-known information to the public about government corruption and certain political crimes, satisfying their salivation for an expose of misdeeds while withholding the more critical, more secretive information (78). Wikileaks doesn’t reveal; it rehashes. Former director of Mossad Efraim Halevy stated in an interview several years ago, ‘Not one big success of the Mossad has ever been made public (79).’ Wikileaks works diligently to keep it that way.

Cablegate is nothing but a promotion of Zionist propaganda.

Cablegate Fraud II: Disgusting Zionist Lies

In a previous piece on Wikileaks, this author commented, ‘The other accusations sound like concoctions dug up from the dungeons of Zionist think tanks and lobby organizations salivating for the destruction of the Islamic Republic, not the work of whistle-blowers attempting to expose corruption and disseminate truth (80).’ This observation turned out to be a prognostication come true. The cables aren’t really secret government documents. They are propaganda pieces written by Khazarian political officials and diplomats who have spent their lives serving the Israeli Lobby. Among them are US ambassadors to Turkey Eric Edelman and James Jeffrey, Deputy Secretary of State James B. Steinberg, US ambassador to Brazil Clifford Sobel, US charge d’affaires in Saudi Arabia Michael Gfoeller, Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs Philip H. Gordon, career diplomat and current Special Envoy Daniel Fried and US ambassador to Canada David Jacobson (81). This revelation explains why the newest docs from Wikileaks contain even more Zionist drivel than the last release.
The diplomatic cables claim that it was Hamas that broke the ceasefire that led to Operation Case Lead (82). They also brazenly claim that the Zionist entity has no assets in occupied Iraq (83). They insanely say that India has a huge stake in the facilitation of peace in occupied Kashmir (84). The cables belligerently claim that Syrians assassinated Lebanese Premier Saad Hariri’s father, former Premier Rafiq Hariri (85). There is more tiresome tripe about leader of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khamenei, having terminal cancer (86). There is another ridiculous claim that there is an Israeli weapons manufacturer in Haifa which is vital to US security interests (87). One cable disgustingly repeats the age-old Zionist propaganda about Israel attempting to minimize civilian casualties and Hamas using human shields (88). And arguably the most outlandish cable of all, Libyan leader Muammar al-Gaddafi intimidated the British government into freeing wrongfully accused Abdelbaset Mohmed Ali al-Megrahi (89). 
Claiming that the fighters of the Palestinian Resistance, whether it is Hamas or any other faction, use human shields, is a grotesque Zionist lie. There is no evidence on any level whatsoever; it is a nightmarish concoction of the hasbara squads that run the Zionist media. However, there is undeniable evidence that the Zionist entity’s occupation forces have used Palestinian human shields on numerous occasions; 15 times since 2005 began (90). Two IOF soldiers were ‘convicted’ in Israel’s kangaroo courts of using a 9-year boy as a human shield. The boy, Majid, will be scarred for the rest of his life for the horrific abuse he endured at the hands of IOF; the soldiers who abused him were demoted and given suspended sentences in an all too typical display of Zionist justice (91). 
It is another aberration of the historical record to state that Hamas broke the ceasefire, when Hamas did not fire a single rocket into the territory occupied by Zion in the four months since the calm between occupied and occupier began (92). Tel Aviv discarded the cease-fire when it calculatingly murdered 6 Hamas officials in a raid on November 5, 2008 (93). When Hamas returned fire to defend itself and the people of occupied Gaza, the murderous Zionist entity had the pretext it needed to launch Operation Cast Lead, which had been planned years in advance by the upper echelons of the Israeli government, Mossad, Shin Bet and Aman {Israeli military intelligence} (94). Is there an organization outside of the media itself that spews Zionist propaganda better than Wikileaks?
Obviously, Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khamenei isn’t dying of cancer; this absurd allegation has been repeated over and over through the years by several mainstream media outlets. It was reported in 2006 that the revolutionary leader was ‘dying of serious cancer and wouldn’t live much more than a year (95).’ In 2007, it was reported as fact that Sayyed Khamenei was dead from his ‘long battle’ with cancer (96). In 2009, foul Zionist Michael Ledeen wrote that the Ayatollah collapsed into a coma as a result of his cancer (97). It should be noted that Ledeen, who has close ties with AIPAC and Zionist war criminal Richard Perle (98), has been a driving force behind the idea that Iran is behind all of the chaos in occupied Iraq (99), which Wikileaks presented a strong case for in its propaganda-filled Iraq War Logs (100). Taking into account that the diplomatic cables are in fact written by Zionists, the connection between Ledeen and Wikileaks isn’t all that surprising. This petty and childish claim about the Ayatollah having cancer is part of a broader psychological warfare operation to discredit, disunite and utterly humiliate the Islamic Republic. The Ayatollah’s ‘cancer’ can be placed in the trash alongside other nonsense like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s Jewish roots and the Israeli star being engraved into several buildings in Tehran (101). 
Not only has Saad Hariri himself already rejected the claims of Syria being behind his father’s brutal assassination (102), as mentioned in a previous section, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah has provided hard evidence that the Zionist entity was the orchestrator of the former premier’s killing (103). All claims to the contrary are extensions of the Zionist campaign to destroy the Lebanese Resistance. 
The Hindutva entity of India has been criminally occupying Kashmir for 63 years, how can such a regime have a ‘huge stake in facilitating peace?’ Since 1989, more than 100,000 innocents have been murdered, over 100,000 children were orphaned, over 22,000 women have been widowed, nearly 10,000 women have been raped, nearly 120,000 Kashmiris have been illegally detained and over 105,000 architectural structures have been razed by the occupying military (104). Mass graves have been found all over the occupied Valley (105). Military torture is common place in occupied Kashmir; sexual abuse, sleep deprivation, electrocution, beatings and stripping prisoners naked are only some of the acts of brutality that have been forced upon the people of Kashmir (106). 
Not a single one of these ungodly crimes against humanity are mentioned by Wikileaks; the occupation itself isn’t even mentioned. Instead, Assange’s organization ‘vindicates’ the Hindutvadis by ‘revealing’ that the ISI coordinates terror attacks in occupied Afghanistan (107). More disgraceful Zionist propaganda. Indian officials have been almost as bold as the Zionist entity, stating that they are ‘not concerned’ about Wikileaks (108). Other officials have boasted that they are ‘not embarrassed’ by Cablegate (109). India is the Zionist entity’s closest ally in Asia; the two racist regimes have collaborated in the occupation of Kashmir and spreading mayhem across Pakistan (110), and the fact that Hindutva isn’t concerned or embarrassed by so-called leaks of secret documents is beyond suspicious; it is collusive.
The theory that Israel is vital to American security, or that it is a satellite of the American ‘empire,’ is typical leftist rubbish to downplay the crimes of Zionism and Zionist power in the US. It is also contradictory to the facts. America doesn’t have a base in occupied Palestine, nor does it have any troops. It only stores minimal weaponry inside the Zionist entity, and this weaponry can be used by IOF at any time, without American permission. Israeli bases cannot be used by the United States. No US puppet that borders the land that Zion stole from Palestine can conduct reconnaissance over Israel, let alone use Zionist bases for taking off. At times, especially after the war of 1973, Israel has undermined the relations between America and other Middle Eastern nations. And due to the chokehold that the Zionist Lobby has on the US government, whenever Israel is being attacked in the international community, America runs like a dog to defend its owner (111). There is no American ‘imperialism’ in Israel, although there is plenty of Zionism in America. Israel serves no interest but its own, manipulating any nation that it needs to, including the genocidal US, to accomplish the goals of international Zionism.
Apart from being another ugly Zionist falsehood, it is an insult to the intelligence of the people to postulate that Israel has no ‘assets’ in occupied Iraq. The sanctions against Iraq, the occupation and subsequent genocide were designed by a neoconservative cabal with dual loyalties to the illegitimate state of Israel (112). No official from this exclusive Zionist group has been harmed by the Wikileaks cables; not one. Mossad has agents stationed across Iraq from Mosul to Fallujah to Baghdad to Najaf to Karbala, wreaking havoc on the Iraqi people with Israeli-made IEDs and car bombs (113). In 2004, there were casualties everyday from made-in-Zion IEDs, and in 2005, three out of five Iraqis that were murdered met their end due to an IED (114). Mossad operations continue to this very moment in Iraq, with the Israeli agency’s masterpiece being the animalistic display of savagery at Sayedat al-Najat Cathedral in Karada, Baghdad, which claimed the lives of 58 Iraqi Christians (115). Wikileaks has done an excellent job at convincing the world that Israel has nothing to do with the annihilation of Iraq; but Assange’s malicious smokescreen is as weak as a spider’s web when challenged with the indestructible blade of the truth.
If it wasn’t being presented as unquestionable gospel, the abominable claim that Muammar al-Gaddafi intimidated the British government into releasing Abdelbaset Mohmed Ali al-Megrahi would be exceedingly funny. The idea that Gaddafi, who was terrorized by Mossad throughout the 1980s (116), somehow bullied the British government, whose intelligence agency MI5 orchestrated the 7/7 terror attacks with Mossad (117), is a slander against al-Megrahi, whose life was ruined by the Lockerbie incident, and a deflection of evidence regarding who was really behind the attack. In fact, it was the British government intimidating and threatening Gaddafi (118). Al-Megrahi wasn’t released due to Libyan intimidation, he was released because he was innocent; there wasn’t a drop of evidence against him (119), and the Western conspiratorial charade couldn’t last any longer. Lockerbie, like 7/7, 9/11, 26/11 and so many other recent ‘terrorist’ attacks blamed on Muslims, was a Mossad false flag intended to influence geopolitics to the detriment of Islamic nations (120). False flags, an Israeli speciality, haven’t just been ‘looked over’ by Wikileaks, they’ve been deliberately left out for the sole benefit of the repulsive Zionist entity. 
The cables dissected here are only a drop in the bucket of hundreds of documents ‘released’ during Cablegate. The Zionist propaganda speaks for itself. It is shameful that so many have accepted this proverbial waste as if it were a holy declaration spoken by a prophet. Simply shameful.

Both of these nations have been assaulted by Wikileaks.

Targeted by Zion: Turkey and Iran

Since Zionist commandoes barbarically executed 9 Turkish peace activists in international waters on May 31st of this year (121), the relationship between Turkey and Israel has become severely strained and entered into a realm of complication. On the positive side, amidst calls from its citizenry, Ankara has taken several steps to disconnect itself from Zionism. Turkish intelligence completely cut its ties with Mossad (122). Turkey also cancelled three extremely lucrative military exercises directly after the Freedom Flotilla massacre (123). Turkey has also continually voted against the illegal sanctions against Iran and signed joint energy agreements with the Islamic Republic and Brazil (124), much to the dispay and the ZOG in America and the Zionist entity itself. Prime Minister Erdogan also defended Hezbollah against the Zionist-designed STL in his recent visit to Lebanon (125).
On the negative side however, all of Prime Minister Erdogan’s harsh rhetoric against the Zionist regime (126), which he unleashed even while he was being threatened with Mossad assassination (127), has proven to be nothing more than just that: rhetoric. Throughout all of the condemning and slamming of Israel, Erdogan and other Turkish officials have continually called for an apology and compensation from the Zionist state, as recently as December 7th(128); as if an apology will undo the murder of 9 innocent peace activists. As if an apology will heal the pain of their families, or bring their killers to justice for crimes against humanity. Israel committed an act of war against Turkey, and Erdogan wants an apology? It extends beyond strangeness and becomes insanity. 
Just days after the massacre, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu simplified everything by saying if Israel lifted the blockade against Gaza, Turkish-Israeli ties will ‘normalize.’ This normalization must also include the illegal 62-year occupation of Palestine, as well as the illegal occupations of Lebanese and Syrian lands, which Turkey has traditionally ignored while making $2.5 billion in imports and exports since 2000 via a free trade agreement with Tel Aviv (129). He also declared, ‘The security of Israeli diplomats and Israeli tourists is our nation’s honor. We will be making sure they are safe (130).’ The citizens of Turkey were murdered by Israel, and Davutoglu is concerned about the safety of the defenders of murder and illegal occupation? Shouldn’t his concern be with making his citizens safe, along with all those oppressed by Zionism? This politically correct square dance for the sake of pleasing Israel is absolutely revolting. 
Disturbingly, while Erdogan showed solidarity with the Lebanese Resistance in his November trip to Lebanon, he also showed solidarity with Israel, unconscionably saying that when peace and security are restored in the region, Israel will ‘win from this peace (131).’ Odd would be an understatement for this remark. Israel is the reason for the lack of security and peace in the region. Israel is the oppressor, occupier, de-stabilizer, murderer, bomber, gangster, assassin, shooter and killer in the Middle East, from one end to the other. As long as this entity remains, peace will never be prospective. Zionism must end for peace to be a reality.
Furthermore, the most abhorrent part of Erdogan’s behavior is his atrocious denial of the Armenian Genocide (132), one of history’s greatest crimes in which the Young Turks movement systematically murdered 1.5 million innocent Armenians between 1915-1923. Erdogan made an even bigger fool out of himself when he preposterously claimed that Armenians ‘exterminated’ Turks (133). This continues the typical stance of all Turkish regimes, which have denied the Armenian Genocide for more than 90 years (134). The Armenian Genocide has always been an event attacked and denied by the Zionist media and Zionist lobby also, most notably the criminal ADL (135), due to the scarcely talked-about facts surrounding the perpetrators of it. 
The Young Turks weren’t Turkish Muslims as it is widely accepted, but Zionists of ‘Jewish’ origin with direct connections to B’nai B’rith, Zionist bankers and the founder of Irgun himself, mass murderer Vladimir Jabotinsky (136). The man who the Zionist Young Turks brought to power (and who also partook in their savage activities), and who is credited with the secularization of Turkey, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, was no more a Muslim than vile Zionist Hillary Clinton; he, like his brethren in the Young Turks, had ‘Jewish’ roots and was known for constantly reciting prayers from the racist, unholy Talmud and the xenophobic Kabbalah (137). Turkey denies this shocking truth as well, sticking to the Zionist lie which is promoted to cause division between Muslims and Christians.
The historical cover-up of the Zionist nature of Ataturk and the Young Turks is pertinent to the character of Erdogan, because he was once an opponent of Ataturk’s secular ideology, and spent time in a Turkish prison for ‘inciting religious hatred’ after reciting a poem with strong Islamic convictions (138). All of these anomalies, coupled with what comes after Wikileaks’ released cables, prove that Erdogan is nothing more than an opportunistic coward, and it is no wonder that Lebanon’s Armenian community courageously protested his visit to their country (139). 
With Turkey, and Erdogan in particular, teetering on the brink of a radical foreign policy shift, in what would be a global game-changer, in comes Julian Assange and Wikileaks with yet another startling revelation: Turkey aided and abetted Al-Qaeda in occupied Iraq (140). Though Erdogan subsequently blasted the cables (141), he mentioned nothing about the undeniable fact that Al-Qaeda is a work of fiction (142), or that Israel is behind Wikileaks; he just barked and barked with his usual fiery rhetoric, and then kowtowed to Zionism when the power brokers in Tel Aviv called. 
It is a direct result of the international embarrassment at the hands of Israel via Wikileaks’ Cablegate, that Erdogan sent Turkish helicopters to Israel and told Benjamin Netanyahu that Turkey will coordinate NATO relief efforts inside the Zionist entity when massive forest fires erupted (143). It is this Zionist smear campaign that is the reason why Turkey is now engaged in high-level talks with the Israeli regime to ‘mend’ its relations with Palestine’s occupier (144). And for what seemed impossible days after the Freedom Flotilla massacre, it is because of Cablegate that an official proposal has been drawn up for Israel to express regret for acting in self-defense and unintentionally killing the Turkish citizens aboard the Mavi Marmara, issue compensation to the families of the slain activists, while preventing prosecution of the IOF commandoes that carried out the murders (145). Justice, peace, solidarity and whatever little dignity Erdogan had, have gone out the window because of Wikileaks; proving that Turkey still is what it has been since the Zionist Young Turks obliterated the Ottoman Empire and exterminated 1.5 million innocent Armenians: an utter tool of Zionism. It is also evident that the calls of Huseyin Celik, a senior Turkish official who accused Israel of initiating the Cablegate ‘leak,’ have fallen upon deaf ears in Ankara (146). 
Senior Israeli intelligence correspondent for Haaretz, Yossi Melman, recently wrote that Cablegate was the work of Mossad, and it was connected with several other recent events in the ongoing international Western intelligence campaign assaulting Iran (147). Benjamin Netanyahu has stated that Wikileaks proves that the Zionist entity is ‘right’ on Iran, and that the entire Middle East is concerned about Iran’s ‘nuclear ambitions (148).’ This constant Israeli lordliness is a reflection of Cablegate eclipsing the Iraq War Logs in terms of the audacity of untruth about the Islamic Republic. Besides, what would a Wikileaks document dump be without Zionist propaganda against Iran? 
The most talked about leaks have most certainly been those mentioning the leaders of the Gulf States expressing not just mere concern about Iran’s nuclear capabilities, but fierce encouragement of an attack on the Islamic Republic (149). There are also cables regarding the 2009 Iranian elections, which Wikileaks calls a ‘coup d’etat,’ and that the revolutionary nation ‘engineered’ Ahmadinejad’s victory (150). Other cables say that Iran has secretly purchased long-range missiles from North Korea (151). There are cables that say Iran is smuggling weapons out of Turkmenistan, in a violation of its neighbor’s sovereignty (152). And of course, there is no shortage on the propaganda regarding Iran aggressively pursing nuclear weapons (153), with one cable even suggesting that Pakistan is a ‘regional competitor (154).’ 
First and foremost, the 2009 Iranian elections were anything but stolen; Mahmoud Ahmadinejad won by a landslide, attaining well over 60% of the votes submitted (155). There is not a single shred of evidence that Iran’s elections were ‘stolen,’ but there is overwhelming evidence that the US, inspired by the Israeli Lobby, spent hundreds of millions of dollars on programs that would de-stabilize Iran and facilitate regime change (156). The Zionist media sold the Western masses a cockamamie story about fraudulent elections based on unsubstantiated reports from Twitter (157), where Mossad agents have been conducting cyber warfare through hasbara since Operation Cast Lead (158). 
This subject however, with all of the facts, has been thoroughly documented by many activists, writers and scholars. The objective of Cablegate was to assault Iran diplomatically, fracturing its ties with the Arab region, as well as to foment ‘sectarian’ tension between Sunni and Shia, Arab and Persian. This miserly Zionist plot has failed however, because regardless of the feelings of the corrupt, US-owned leaders of the Gulf States, 88% of the Arab citizens view Israel as the predominant threat in the region, 77% view America as the threat, while a minute 10% view Iran as a threat; there is also overwhelming support for Iran’s peaceful nuclear program (159). Ethnicity and religion are irrelevant; in defiance of US-Zionist efforts, Resistance will support Resistance always.
The attempted scheme to disrupt and destroy Iran’s diplomatic relations with the Arab world, especially as Iran works with Syria and Saudi Arabia for peace in Lebanon, efforts which Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah has called ‘sincere (160),’ has also failed. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has slammed Wikileaks as psychological warfare; he further said that the information wasn’t leaked, but organized, and went on to say, ‘We are friends with the regional countries and mischievous acts will not affect relations (161).’ Iran’s Parliament Speaker, Ali Larijani said that the enemies of regional stability are behind Wikileaks and it is only an attempt to promote discord (162). Iran’s former Foreign Minister, Manouchehr Mottaki said the ‘questionable’ Wikileaks documents will not affect Iran’s brotherly and friendly relations with the Gulf States (163). 
Cablegate opened up the gates for two significant events: new, stronger illegal sanctions against the Islamic Republic by the United States (164), and another Mossad assassination of an Iranian scientist, Majid Shahriari (165). Jeffrey Goldberg, the Israeli-American journalist that spread horrific lies to promote the Zionist invasion of Iraq (166), used Cablegate to spread an even more ludicrous premise, that an Arab Lobby is supporting a war against Iran, and not a ‘Jewish’ Lobby (167). Zionist David Frum, Bush’s former speechwriter and loathsome war criminal, has also used Cablegate to justify an all-out military offensive against Iran (168). 
It is troubling, that many in the ‘anti-war’ movement have ignored the Zionist fingerprints all over Wikileaks, and have stated that an American war against Iran will never happen; they have outlandishly stated that there is no evidence of such a war, and even more outlandishly, that Wikileaks has exposed Iranian support of American ‘imperialism.’ It is troubling, that it will take another Zionist-designed genocide to awaken such persons from their media-induced slumber. The war against Iran isn’t happening in the future, nor is it a fabrication; the US-Zionist war against Iran is taking place right now. And it has been for quite some time.
The United States has surrounded the Islamic Republic with gunboats on numerous occasions, halted Iranian ships for arms shipments to the Resistance of Gaza, financed and educated Iranian ‘dissidents’ to bring about a pro-Western regime totally disconnected from the Islamic Revolution, kidnaped Iranian diplomats in occupied Iraq, kidnaped Iranian military personal on the Iranian border and then tortured them inside Iraq, continually spied on Iran and violated its sovereignty, attacked Iran’s currency and its international financial affairs, and funded ‘terrorist’ proxies to carry out murderous attacks on innocents within Iran (169). The organization Jundullah, has waged barbaric warfare against the Islamic Republic, claiming thousands of lives; Jundullah is fully backed by the CIA and receives nearly $400 million a year from the US State Department (170). Mossad is also linked to Jundullah, providing training for the front operation, and coordinating several strikes against Iranian mosques (171). Ardeshire Hassanpour, a 44-year old Iranian nuclear scientist, was assassinated by Mossad in 2007 (172). Just days before the Cablegate release, Israel skyjacked an Iranian plane for the 130th time since 1984 (173). The Stuxnet computer virus, which originated in Israel (174), was unleashed on Iran’s industrial sector, including its nuclear power plant, by the Zionist entity in September of this year (175). Will this suffice as enough evidence of acts of war against Iran? Everything aforesaid is only part of the American-Israeli onslaught against the Islamic Revolution; to weaken it before the long-planned invasion and occupation.
Wikileaks, with extensive help from the Zionist media, has broken Turkey and deepened international Zionism’s war against Iran. Wikileaks’ largest success however, has been its coopting of the worldwide activist network, totally blinding it from seeing its function as the archer for every target that the Zionist entity considers an enemy.

Wikileaks is an Israeli-American intelligence operation.

Wikileaks Exposed: The CIA, Google, PROMIS and More

Some authors and writers have suggested that an intelligence service may be behind Wikileaks, and others, like Pakistani Army General Mirza Aslam Beg have said outright that only CIA and Mossad could be behind such an operation (176). The General is spot on; Wikileaks has several connections to US intelligence, and these connections uncover several mysteries about Wikileaks, including who they are exactly and what exactly it is that they do.
Co-Founder of Wikileaks, John Young, whom Julian Assange calls Wikileaks’ spiritual godfather, left the organization in its early stages after labeling it a CIA operation for data-mining (177). Though Young has recently changed his position for one of support, the members of Wikileaks’ Advisory Board confirm Young’s original suspicions. One of these members is security expert (and Wikileaks security designer) Ben Laurie (178), who is currently working on several projects for Google (179). 
Google’s links to the intelligence community are vast; the internet giant has a security agreement with the NSA (180), the electronic surveillance organization responsible for spying on millions of Americans (181), a partnership with the CIA via its joint business venture with the agency’s investment wing, In-Q-Tel (182), in the purchase of an internet monitoring organization, Recorded Future (183), a working relationship with the Zionist Organization of America, profoundly linked to the Israeli military establishment (184), to fight anti-Semitism and ‘anti-Israel propaganda (185),’ and a disturbing research project in Tel Aviv, where Zionist founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page have major ties, to delve into the aspects of the human genome and genetic data-mining (186). The Google ties alone are enough to discredit and expose the entire Wikileaks operation.
Wikileaks is being heavily funded by Mossad and corrosive, criminal Zionist billionaire George Soros, and is also directly involved with a $20 million CIA operation involving Chinese ‘dissidents’ trained by the agency to hack into China’s computers and reroute the implanted viruses to American government computer systems, all for the purpose of increasing the cyber defense budget (187), a plan that began when dual-citizen of Israel and Mossad operative Amit Yoran was elected Cyber Security Czar by war criminal George W. Bush in 2003 (188). Amit Yoran and his family were a key part of the Mossad false attack on September 11th (189); just one more example of more than 60 years of Israeli espionage against the United States, including cyber warfare (190). Some of these ‘dissidents’ are Wang Dan, Xiao Qiang, and Wang Youcai, all members of Wikileaks’ Advisory Board. This operation is an extension of the CIA’s ‘Operation Yellowbird,’ an earlier scheme in which the CIA supported the subversive activities of ‘pro-democracy’ Chinese citizens and rescued them from prosecution at the hands of the Chinese government (191). 
Is there any mention of this CIA sabotage against China in any of the Cablegate documents? Obviously not. What about Zionist spying? Nowhere to be found. Instead, predictably, there are cables blaming China for espionage against the United States and Google (192); considering the security connections of Google with CIA, NSA and the Israeli military, this is beyond asinine. It is clear, that this is just more damage control to completely cover up the CIA-Wikileaks operation.

Another member of Wikileaks’ Advisory board is Tashi Namgyal Khamsitsang, former representative of the Dalai Lama and president of the Tibetan Association of Washington (193). George Soros is a major financial contributor to the Dalai Lama (194), the ‘spiritual’ leader of the Tibetan ‘struggle for independence.’ The Soros-founded International Crisis Group vociferously promotes the Tibetan cause, spreading falsehoods about Chinese ethnic cleansing and other concocted crimes against humanity (195). This is another Zionist-engineered farce to distract the masses from the real struggles of Palestine, Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Yemen and Pakistan. The Tibetan freedom movement has been funded by the CIA for decades through its National Endowment For Democracy (NED) to weaken China’s social fabric; NED was used by the agency to provide millions per year to its Asian clients, including $180,000.00 per year for the Dalai Lama himself (196). NED is an integral part of none other than the CIA’s Operation Yellowbird (197). Any mention in the Cablegate documents of the CIA’s subversive connections to Tibet? Absolutely not; but there is plenty of sewage about China oppressing Tibet and restricting the Dalai Lama’s movements (198).
The remaining members of Wikileaks’ Advisory Board are Phillip Adams and Francisco ‘Chico’ Whitaker Ferreira. Adams is a columnist for The Australian (199), a newspaper owned by News Corporation (200), the media conglomerate of infamous Zionist billionaire, Keith Rupert Murdoch, who recently accepted an award from the Zionist propaganda arm, the Anti-Defamation League (201). Ferreira worked as a researcher and consultant with UNESCO, and is currently a member of the World Future Council (202). The World Future Council is an organization dedicated to globalization via the strengthening of the UN, and it is a frequenter of the supranational organization’s conventions on environmental issues (203). The World Future Council has also worked extensively with the Zionist European Union, contributing several points to its Directive on renewable energy (204), an unabashed promotion of the ‘global warming’ agenda which has been thoroughly debunked as a scientific hoax (205). 
UNESCO is the criminal United Nations organization that has been complicit in the anarchic corruption that has destroyed Iraq’s once flourishing educational system (206), and the group that has overseen the looting of Iraq’s most precious artifacts, antiquities and ancient books, which it attributes to ‘professionals (207).’ These professionals are none other than the agents of Mossad, who have looted Iraq’s precious artifacts from Baghdad to Mosul to Najaf (208), and UNESCO has watched Israel’s intelligence apparatus steal Iraq’s priceless history without making a peep about Zion’s crimes. This isn’t surprising however, as UNESCO has a partnership with L’Oreal, in which the supranational wing and cosmetics giant issue 5 ‘For Women In Science’ awards every year (209). L’Oreal is a massive contributor to the illegitimate Zionist state, and has set up its commercial center of the Middle East in Israel, it has been praised by the American Jewish Committee and the ADL, it has accepted awards from mass murderer Benjamin Netanyahu and has given out scholarships worth $10,000.00 to Israeli students (210). It is utter Zionist collusion on the part of UNESCO, which of course, has never been acknowledged by Wikileaks.
The questions are just begging to be asked. What kind of whistleblower organization takes money from Mossad and CIA? And what kind of whistleblower organization’s advisory board is comprised of CIA agents, CIA assets, Zionist journalists and globalists? And if such an organization takes such blood money, and is comprised of such personalities, it really isn’t all that’s cracked up to be, now is it? And it actually is what it sounds like: an intelligence front.
The most devastating blow to Wikileaks’ whistleblower aura is the revelation that it is using PROMIS software to filter the information it attains before its world-renowned leaks (211). PROMIS was created by the INSLAW corporation, owned by former NSA agent, Bill Hamilton. Though Hamilton’s intention was to transfer the license of his revolutionary software to the United States government, PROMIS was stolen by officials from war criminal Ronald Reagan’s Justice Department and handed over to the CIA and the NSA, who re-formatted the technology to use it in global espionage operations (212). There is not an organization on planet earth with access to PROMIS software, that isn’t connected to the CIA or a proxy of the CIA. It is the final shot from the cannon, shattering every piece of Wikileaks’ armor.
Obama’s Regulation Czar, obnoxious Zionist Cass Sunstein, has called for government infiltration of all groups that propose historical revisionism and ‘conspiracy theories (213).’ With Wikileaks’ vast connections to the CIA, and its glamorous image in the anti-war movement, it is clear that Assange’s group is a reflection of Sunstein’s Orwellian vision. Wikileaks is COINTELPRO 2.0, cyber edition.

 

Julian Assange has been bought and paid for by Israel.

 

Assange: Darling of The Zionist Elite
One wonders how documents that were written by Zionist diplomats, filtered with CIA software and vigorously promoted by the Zionist media can be so adamantly accepted as unequivocal truth by those associated with anti-war sentiments and anti-Zionism. One wonders how such individuals can discard their logic, principles and dignity so easily. And one wonders what force is preventing them from regaining their senses. Every group needs a polarizing and charismatic leader to guide them and nurture them. In the case of the successfully coopted anti-war movement, that leader is 39-year old hacker and ‘whistle-blower’ extraordinaire, Julian Assange from Queensland, Australia. 
While Assange has been depicted by the Zionist media as a renegade on the run from Interpol in a high-octane Hollywood action thriller, a voice of the people and a hero to be worshiped by men and women alike, an examination of the record serves as a fan to blow the Zionist smokescreen right into the abyss and expose the man behind Zion’s mask. Though the mainstream press continues to say that Assange was arrested in the UK for ‘sex crimes’ committed in Sweden, this is a fallacy; Assange willingly met with UK police on his lawyer’s advice (214). Interpol’s infamous ‘red notice’ that it posted on Assange was never needed (215), because despite media reports of Assange living his life in hiding, the UK police knew exactly where he was for 30 days (216). As the circus of Assange’s rape/molestation charges chugs on with vigor, the Zionist media deliberately (and conveniently) left out the fact that Sweden’s rape charges against Assange were dropped already back in August (217). Interpol, an international police cooperation outfit, is known for apprehending criminals of all sorts from pole to pole across the earth; if the intent was to incarcerate and silence Assange, why wasn’t he picked up at the internationally covered press conference he gave in Geneva in November of this year (218)? 
The lawyer that instructed Julian Assange to turn himself in was Mark Stephens, of Finers Stephens Innocent, the London legal heavyweight. Mark Stephens is an ardent Zionist who defended Yoram Blachar, the former head of the Israeli Medical Association, an organization known for its doctors engaging in the horrific torture of Palestinians (219). On behalf of Blacher, Mark Stephens filed a libel suit against Dr. Derek Summerfield, a UK-based physician who repeatedly blasted Blachar and his complicity with the Zionist entity’s crimes against humanity (220). 
Stephens has also defended several Zionist media outlets (221), including CNN, headed by CEO Jeffrey Bewkes, a staunch Zionist who has been honored by notorious Zionist institutions the American Jewish Committee and the Simon Wiesenthal Center (222), ABC, headed by CEO Robert Iger, who has been honored by the extremist Zionist organization, Aish HaTorah (223), the New York Times, known for its disgustingly pro-Israel bias in all of its reporting on the Middle East (224), as well as the Wall Street Journal (225), owned by ultra-Zionist Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation. Finers Stephens Innocent serves as a legal advisor for Waddesdon Manor, owned by the godfathers of Israel, the Rothschild banking family, which explains why Mark Stephens is also a Freeman of the City of London (226), the financial district of London which governs all major financial happenings across the globe and is dominated by the Rothschild clan (227). 
Julian Assange has his own disturbing connections to the Zionist Rothschild dynasty. In 2008, Assange accepted the ‘Economist Index On Censorship Award’ from The Economist Magazine (228). The Economist is part of the Economist Group, a media corporation which is 50% owned by the Zionist Rothschilds (229). In addition, Assange is an ‘absolute’ proponent of Zionist-designed free market capitalism, declaring in a recent Forbes interview that he ‘loves markets,’ and that Wikileaks was designed for the benefit of capitalism (230). Free market capitalism is the repugnant capitalist ideology of Milton Friedman, whom many consider to be Adam Smith reborn (231). Milton Friedman was a dual-citizen of Israel, he issued many lectures at Zionist universities built on occupied Palestinian land, he atrociously considered the illegitimate Zionist state a ‘beautiful and diversified country, with enemies on all sides,’ he donated regularly to the Israel Center for Social and Economic Progress, a Zionist ‘charity,’ and was a friend to Israeli war criminals Menachem Begin, Shimon Peres and Ariel Sharon (232). 
During the transition of being ‘on the run from the law’ and turning himself in to the law, Julian Assange wrote an editorial for The Australian, the Zionist-owned newspaper where his fellow Wikileaks board member Phillip Adams is a stalwart. The very concept of writing an editorial for a Zionist-owned newspaper while supposedly on the run from international intelligence agents should have been a wake-up call for every activist who accepts Wikileaks as truth, that Assange and Wikileaks are nothing but a sideshow; unfortunately, this didn’t open their eyes to the ‘dancing bears’ either. In Assange’s editorial, he remarkably declared that he isn’t anti-war, and what is even more opprobrious, he glorified Zionist billionaire Rupert Murdoch, and his elitist father, Keith Murdoch, citing them as sources of journalistic integrity and truth, and then comparing Wikileaks’ efforts to those of the Murdoch family (233). Rupert Murdoch is anything but a source of truth; he has dedicated billions upon billions of dollars to spreading disinformation, sensationalism and outright lies with his Fox News Network to unabashedly condone the illegal Zionist wars in occupied Iraq and Afghanistan (234); his promotion of the genocidal invasion of Iraq was in such a great amount, that it was called ‘Mr. Murdoch’s war (235).’ In that case then, Assange’s comparison is quite accurate, since Wikileaks does nothing but promote Zionist distortion. 
The more despicable, and most certainly more collusive of Assange’s praises, is that of the originator of the ‘war on terror,’ Zionist war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu. In an interview with Bewkes-owned TIME Magazine, Assange called Netanyahu a ‘sophisticated politician,’ and used the butcher of Gaza as an example of a world leader who respects the leaks of his organization, and even went on to say that Netanyahu believes Wikileaks will lead to ‘an increase in the peace process in the Middle East and particularly in relation to Iran,’ and most damningly, admitting that Cablegate was in the interest of Israel (236). It is not coincidental at all, that the two Zionist objects of Julian Assange’s praise are quite good friends; Netanyahu stays at Rupert Murdoch’s estate when the war criminal is in London (237).
What kind of whistle-blower gives his leaks to Zionist-owned, corporate, elitist newspapers and then writes an editorial for one? What kind of hero of the oppressed people hires a Zionist lawyer that defends the torture of Palestinians and the institutions that cover it up? What kind of freedom fighter accepts an award from the Rothschild family, one of the greatest causes of the destruction of peace and justice throughout the world? What kind of revolutionary is inspired by Zionist liars like the Murdoch family and offers his praise to filthy war criminals like Benjamin Netanyahu? What kind of champion of the people subscribes to Zionist-created free market capitalism and admits that his organization was created to nonsensically make an anti-freedom and anti-ethics ideology more ‘free and ethical?’ What kind of defender of truth mentions Iran’s nuclear program as if it was a threat to ‘peace’ while totally ignoring hundreds of Israeli nukes? Julian Assange is none of these things; and to label him as such, is an insult to those righteous persons who are. Julian Assange is a Zionist shill, bought and paid for by the Israel-first elite, Mossad and the CIA, planted in the activism community as the front man for the new generation of COINTELPRO.

 

Resistance and Knowledge will trigger Revolution; not Wikileaks.

 

Conclusion: Real Heroes and Real Leaks
A final note needs to be made about some recent allegations in Arabic media regarding secret videos and recordings of Julian Assange taking money from Israeli officials and cutting a deal with the Zionist entity to protect it from Wikileaks’ document dumps (238). While it is indeed true that Assange has certainly taken money from Israeli intelligence, this theory implies that Wikileaks wasn’t always a corrupt organization; that the intentions of Wikileaks were once pure. This is a terribly false narrative that makes Assange and company look like victims bullied by the Zionist entity. Assange and his crew are assets of Israel, not enemies turned friends.
It is already an established fact that Assange has been taking money from Mossad, CIA and Zionist George Soros from the very beginning; before Wikileaks even became an internationally renowned ‘whistle-blower,’ the Zionist media was treating it as such, with Assange’s organization being touted by Zionist-owned TIME Magazine and the propaganda-spewing Washington Post (239). Wikileaks’ first official leak was a despicable pack of lies against the Somali Resistance (240), fighting vehemently against the Zionist-instigated, US-backed United Nations-African Union occupation of their country (241). Every leak thereafter didn’t harm Israel either; this shows solidarity with the illegitimate usurping regime from the jump, not a case of flip-flopping and turn-coating. In addition, Julian Assange has admitted to having connections to Australian intelligence (242), which has been reporting first to Mossad for decades, including, not so ironically, in the case of true whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu, tipping the Israeli intelligence agency off prior to his kidnaping (243). 
The very fact that Assange has given all of his documents to Zionist-owned elitist media outlets should have been enough to raise a red flag with anyone and everyone pursing truth, peace and justice. Instead, like sheep, Wikileaks’ followers are being led right to slaughter. Just like the sinking of the Lusitania was the false flag for World War One, Pearl Harbor was the false flag for World War Two, the Gulf of Tonkin was the false flag for Vietnam and 9/11 was the false flag for Zionism’s current hegemonic onslaught against the Middle East, Wikileaks is the Zionist-created false flag that is being used right now, at this very moment, to usher in an all-out assault on the internet, with Zionist war criminal Joseph Lieberman leading the way with the first shot: new legislation that is being called ‘Patriot Act for the internet (244).’
A real leak is one that doesn’t serve the Zionist agenda; a real hero is one that fights against Zionism and exposes it with reckless abandon, only concerned with the truth.
No mention in the Zionist media is the leak of the names, ranks, photos and addresses of 200 Israeli war criminals that participated in the genocide of Operation Cast Lead against occupied Gaza in 2008-09 (245). 
No mention in the Zionist media is the leak initiated by former IOF soldier Anat Kam, who delivered 2,000 classified military files that detailed war crimes (including targeted assassinations) committed in the occupied West Bank to Haaretz journalist Uri Blau (246). An Israeli gag order was put on the whole affair (247), and Anat Kam remains on house arrest, awaiting a life imprisonment sentence for ‘treason’ against the Israeli regime (248).
Unless it is part of a smear campaign, there is no mention in the Zionist media of the undeniably true statements of courageous former White House press core reporter Helen Thomas, who said that Zionists own Congress, the White House, Hollywood, Wall Street and American foreign policy (249). Instead of dissecting the evidence, there are only pathetic accusations of anti-Semitism. 
Never mentioned in the rotten Zionist media is Gary Webb, the brave investigative journalist that completely exposed the CIA drug trafficking operation to pump cocaine into African-American communities in Los Angeles (250). Contrary to ridiculous media reports of Gary Webb committing suicide by shooting himself in the head twice, he was assassinated by the CIA for bringing the agency’s racist criminality to light (251). 
Never mentioned by the Zionist-owned media machine is the tragic story of another noble investigative reporter, Danny Casolaro, who unearthed an international conspiracy centered around the theft of the aforementioned PROMIS software of the INSLAW corporation, with the butcher of Iraq, Zionist war criminal George H.W. Bush sitting at the head, shadowing the affair through his secretive criminal society known as the Black Rose; Casolaro was snuffed out in brutal fashion by the very same criminals he exposed (252).
No mention in the Zionist-controlled press is the meticulous and shocking research of Edward Hooper, who wrote a nearly-1,200-page investigative masterpiece undeniably destroying mainstream AIDS theory and uncovering that it was actually created by a Zionist scientist named Hillary Koprowski, who gave contaminated, mutated dosages of Oral Polio Vaccine to more than a quarter of a million Congolese youth after being commissioned by the United States government to do so (253).
Never in the Zionist media are the veracious efforts of Cathy O’Brien and Mark Phillips mentioned, who blew the whistle on the barbaric CIA mind control programs of Project Monarch and MKULTRA, which brought to light the unbearably twisted criminal behavior of the highest echelons of various governments (254).
Never mentioned by the Zionist media is Sibel Edmonds, the Turkish-American FBI translator turned whistle-blower that exposed varying degrees of spying within the US government, including significant revelations about collusion between the Turkish military, Israeli military intelligence, AIPAC and the neo-conservative Zionist Power Configuration governing America’s foreign policy (255). 
And never is it mentioned, nor will it ever be mentioned by the Zionist media the name of Milton William Cooper, better known as Bill Cooper, the writer, shortwave radio broadcaster, researcher and activist that exposed every degree of the international conspiracy dominating the world today (256), including a brilliant expose of the vile history of the Anti-Defamation League (257). On June 28th, 2001, during his nightly ‘Hour Of The Time’ broadcast, which can be heard on various outlets across the web, Bill Cooper predicted that a false flag attack was to be carried out in New York City in the coming months, and it would be blamed on Osama Bin Laden to initiate the next phase of globalization, or the ‘New World Order.’ In November of 2001, just months after his chilling prediction, Bill Cooper was murdered outside of his home.
These men and women, along with the previously discussed Mordechai Vanunu and Robert Friedman, are real whistle-blowers; real journalists; real activists; and in several cases, real heroes. Their sacrifice, along with the sacrifice and efforts of giants like Malcolm X, Patrice Lumumba, Salvador Allende, Fela Kuti, Omar Mukhtar, Mehdi Ben Barka, Che Guevara, General Abdul Karim Qasem, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, Fred Hampton and Ayatollah Sayyed Ruhollah Khomeini should be studied and drawn upon for light, strength, inspiration and guidance in the revolutionary struggle for peace, truth, freedom and justice for all oppressed people. The Zionist media can keep Julian Assange and the rest of its intelligence-connected, manufactured frauds.
It must never be forgotten (and constantly reiterated) that Assange despicably stated that he is annoyed by ‘false conspiracies such as 9/11 (258),’ although there is overwhelming evidence that there was a massive cover-up to hide the fact that the towers were demolished from the inside with explosives (259), and that there were Mossad agents and high-ranking sayanim of the Zionist entity at every post to carry out the intricacies of the famed false flag attack (260). Like Bin Laden, who was in a US hospital meeting with CIA officials only two months before the 9/11 attacks (261), Julian Assange was a guest at a cocktail party at a US embassy nearly a year ago (262). Revelations will continue to surface about Assange’s deception and his connections to the usurping, occupying Tel Aviv regime while the Zionist media simultaneously lies to the public about his heroism in the typical, perfect language of the Hegelian Dialectic. Do not fall for the trick. Wikileaks is Zionist poison. This is the deconstruction of the myth that says it is anything but.
~ The End~
Sources:
(1) Obama And The Jews by Pauline Dubkin Yearwood, Chicago Jewish News
(2) Obama Pledges ‘Unshakeable Commitment’ To Israel’s Security by Jonathan D. Salant, Bloomberg
(3) Obama’s Gaza Silence Condemned by Al-Jazeera
(4) A Day Of Terror: The Israelis; Spilled Blood Is Seen As Bond That Draws 2 Nations Closer by James Bennet, The New York Times
(5) Conflict With Iraq – An Israeli Perspective by Benjamin Netanyahu
(6) Netanyahu: 9/11 Attacks Good For Israel by Al-Manar; Report: Netanyahu Says 9/11 Terror Attacks Good For Israel by Haaretz and Reuters
(7) Netanyahu To US Jews: Direct Mideast Talks Will Begin Very Soon by Natasha Mozgovaya and Barak Ravid, Haaretz
(8) Netanyahu: Israel Won’t Be Center Of Wikileaks Release by Ma’an News Agency
(9) Israel ‘Satisfied’ As Wikileaks Shows Consistency On Iran by Ma’an News Agency
(10) Video: The Wiki (Israel) Leaks by Russia Today
(11) Israel Greets Wikileaks As Vindication Of Its Iran Policy by Joshua Mitnick, The Christian Science Monitor
(12) The World Thinks Like Us by Sever Plocker, Ynet News
(13) Wikileaks Expose: Israel Tried To Coordinate Gaza War With Abbas by Barak Ravid, Haaretz
(14) Yemen Cable Gives Al-Qaeda New ‘Recruiting’ Tool by Michael Isikoff, MSNBC
(15) The (Not So) Secret War U.S. War In Pakistan by Jeremy Scahill, CBS News
(16) Lebanon ‘Gave Israeli Army Tips’ by Al-Jazeera
(17) U.S. Flew Spy Missions Over Lebanon: Leaked Cable by Dominic Evans, Reuters
(18) Cable 09TELAVIV1098, Israel, A Promised Land For Organized Crime? by Wikileaks
(19) Israel, PA Deepen Security Cooperation by The Jerusalem Post
(20) Hamas Slams Abbas’s Confession To His Security Coordination With Israel by The Palestinian Information Center
(21) Israel Confirms Arms Shipment Sent To Aid Abbas by Steve Erlanger, The New York Times
(22) Israel Restores Financial Ties To Palestinian Authority by Steve Erlanger, The New York Times
(23) Background Note: Yemen by U.S. Department of State 
(24) Middle East: Yemen by USAID
(25) In Yemen, US Faces Leader Who Puts Family First by Steve Erlanger, The New York Times
(26) The Yemen Hidden Agenda: Behind The Al-Qaeda Scenarios, A Strategic Oil Transit Chokepoint by F. William Engdahl, Global Research
(27) US Bombs Yemen, Kills 120, Just Another Day In The Life Of An Empire by Robert Taylor, The San Francisco Examiner
(28) Lieberman: Yemen Will Be ‘Tomorrow’s War’ If Preemptive Action Not Taken by Jordan Fabian, The Hill
(29) The Yemen Brief: Expanding Scope Of US Military Engagement Exactly What Bin Laden Wants by Steve Clemons, Talking Points Memo
(30) President Saleh Denies US Military Presence In Yemen by Yemen News Agency 
(31) US To Boost Military Presence In Yemen by Press TV
(32) ‘US, Israel Behind Yemen Bombing’ by Press TV
(33) The CIA’s Silent War In Pakistan by Bobby Ghosh and Mark Thompson, TIME Magazine
(34) Pakistan Allowing CIA To Use Airbase For Drone Strikes by Amanda Hodge, The Australian
(35) Pakistan: Over 700 Civilians Killed In US Drone Strikes by Dawn News
(36) Unauthorized US Strike Kills 5 Pakistanis by Press TV
(37) U.S. Special Forces Strike In Pakistan by Farhan Bokhari, Sami Yousafzai and Tucker Reals, CBS News; US Forces ‘Violate’ Pakistan Territory With Attack On Taliban by The Telegraph 
(38) Soldier Deaths Draw Focus To US In Pakistan by Jane Perlez, The New York Times
(39) India And Israel: A Wrong Alliance Part One by Shahul Hameed, Ovi Magazine
(40) Mossad And India Spy Agency Team Up, Target Pakistan by Tariq Saeedi, Globe Intel
(41) Mossad-RAW Nexus by S.M. Hali, Pakistan Daily
(42) Blackwater/Xe Attacks In Pakistan by The Daily Mail
(43) Peshawar Police Chief Claims RAW, Mossad Behind The Killing Of Three Chinese by Andhra News
(44) Pakistan Car Bomb Toll Passes 100 by BBC News
(45) Local Reactions On Sayyed Nasrallah’s Speech In Martyrs Day by Al-Manar
(46) Murr Denies Wikileaks’ Allegations by Ahram Online
(47) Why Hezbollah’s Victory May Lead To Peace In The Middle East: Interview With Franklin Lamb by Mike Whitney, Global Research
(48) Iran Shoots Down U.S. Spy Drone Amid Growing Military Pressure by Liang Youchang, Xinhua English; Diego Garcia: Iran Attack Mystery Deepens by Rob Edwards, Herald Scotland
(49) Diego Garcia, Swept Clean And Sanitized by Deanna Spingnola, News With Views
(50) Hizbullah Secretary General: Lebanon, ALL Of Lebanon, Will Not Tolerate Any Violation Of Its Sacred Land by Nour Rida, Moqawama English
(51) Lebanon Submits UN Protest Over ‘Israeli Spies’ by The Telegraph
(52) ‘Israeli Spies Used Alfa In 33-Day War’ by Press TV
(53) The Hariri Assassination: Israel’s Fingerprints by Rannie Amiri, Global Research
(54) ‘Israel Benefitted Rafiq Hariri Murder’ by Press TV
(55) U.S. Pledges 10 Million For UN-Backed Lebanon Tribunal by Reuters
(56) Britain To Give A Further $1.6 Million To Lebanon Tribunal Investigating Hariri Murder by The Associated Press
(57) ‘Israel Aided US-Backed Hariri Tribunal’ by Press TV
(58) ‘Tribunal Is Israel’s 6th War On Lebanon:’ Interview With Franklin Lamb by Press TV
(59) Nasrallah: Boycott U.N. Tribunal by CBN News
(60) Sayyed Nasrallah: Days When You Could Threaten Us Are Over by Mohamad Shmaysani, Al-Manar
(61) Hezbollah Discovers Israeli Spy Devices by Press TV
(62) Instant Greater Israel – Just Add Water by Damian Lataan, The People’s Voice
(63) Israeli ‘Mafia’ Boss Assassinated by Paul Wood, BBC News
(64) Israeli Faces U.S. Drug Charges by The Orlando Sentinel
(65) Police In Israel Grapple With A Mafia Gang War by Ashraf Khalil, The Los Angeles Times
(66) Blood And Volume: Inside New York’s Israeli Mafia by Dave Copeland
(67) Olmert’s 9/11 Mafia by Barry Chamish
(68) PM To Face Criminal Investigation Over Bank Leumi Sale Affair by Yuval Yoaz, Haaretz
(69) US Groups Buys 9.99% of Bank Leumi by Yigal Grayeff, The Jerusalem Post
(70) What Do Susan Sarandon, Alan Dershowitz And The Russian Mob Have In Common? by Richard Silverstein, Tikun Olam
(71) Red Mafiya: How The Russian Mob Has Invaded America by Robert Friedman (rip)
(72) Mogilevich Indicted In Pennsylvania For Racketeering, Money Laundering by US-Russia Press Club 
(73) The Billion Dollar Don (documentary) by BBC News
(74) The Russian-Israeli Mafia: Off-Limits To FBI, US Intelligence by Wayne Madsen
(75) The Best Investigative Reporter You’ve Never Heard Of by Sherry Ricchiardi, American Journalism Review
(76) Inconvenient Truth: Robert Friedman, Investigate Journalist by Dan Bischoff, The Village Voice
(77) The Judeo-Russian Mafia: From The Gulag To Brooklyn To World Dominion by M. Raphael Johnson, PH.D.
(78) Limited Hang Out: Illusions Of Incompetence Theories And Intelligence Failures To Cover Up Scandals by Oil Empire
(79) Spy Chief: Simon Talks With Former Mossad Head by David Kohn, CBS News
(80) Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(81) Wikileaks: US Hits Back At Israel by Wayne Madsen
(82) At Least One Wikileak Is Just A Bold-Faced Lie – And It’s a Significant One by Scott Creighton
(83) Cable 05TELAVIV1580: Mossad Chief To Codel Corzine: Some Foreign by Wikileaks
(84) Kashmir Shows Up In Wikileaks by Greater Kashmir
(85) Cable 07TELAVIV2652, U/S Burns’ August 17th Meeting With Israeli Mossad by Wikileaks
(86) Wikileaks: Ayatollah Khamenei Has Terminal Cancer by Damien McElroy, The Telegraph
(87) Wikileaks: Israel Weapons Manufacturer Listed As Site Vital To US Interests by Barak Ravid, Haaretz
(88) Cable 09TELAVIV2482: Assistant Secretary Of Defense Vershbow Meets With by Wikileaks
(89) Wikileaks Cables: Lockerbie Bomber Freed After Gaddafi’s ‘Thuggish’ Threats by David Leigh, The Guardian
(90) IDC: IOF Used Palestinian Children As Human Shields On 15 Occasions by The Palestinian Information Center
(91) Israeli Soldiers Demoted Over Crimes by Press TV
(92) Israel’s Fabricated Rocket Crisis by Jim Holstun and Joanna Tinker, The Electronic Intifada
(93) Israel Broke Ceasfire by Killing Six by David Morrison, The Irish Times
(94) The Invasion Of Gaza: ‘Operation Cast Lead,’ Part Of A Broader Israeli Military-Intelligence Agenda by Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research
(95) Iran’s Belligerent Actions by Jaclyn Schiff, CBS News
(96) Report: Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei Dead by National Terror Alert Response Center News
(97) Khamenei Said To Be In A Coma by Michael Ledeen, Pajamas Media
(98) Veteran Neo-Con Advisor Moves On Iran by Jim Lobe, The Asia Times
(99) Iran Connects The Dots by Michael Ledeen, The National Review
(100) Ho Hum, More Wikileaks ‘Chickenfeed’ by Gordon Duff, Veterans Today
(101) Iran And The ‘Zionist Pranks’ by Rehmat’s World
(102) Lebanon PM: It Was Wrong To Accuse Syria Of Assassinating Rafiq al-Hariri by Ian Black, The Guardian 
(103) Sayyed Nasrallah: Israel Behind Hariri’s Assassination by Hussein Assi, Al-Manar
(104) The Bleeding Vale Of Kashmir by Brigadier General Asif Haroon Raja
(105) Mass Graves In Kashmir by Fatima Sultan Syed
(106) Shadows In Kashmir Torture Cells Longer Than Abu Ghraib by The Milli Gazette
(107) Wikileaks Vindicates India’s Terror Charge Of ISI Terror Network by The Economic Times
(108) India Is Not Concerned About Wikileaks: Krishna by Akbar Majid, MeriNews
(109) India Is Not Embarrassed By Any Wikileaks’ Revelations by Sulekha News
(110) Israel And India: Brothers In Occupation Of Kashmir by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(111) Freeman: Israel Is Useless To US Power Projection by Chas Freeman, Mondoweiss
(112) The High Priests Of War by Michael Collins Piper
(113) The Zionist Murderers Of Iraq by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(114) America’s S.O.S. To The IDF by Amir Oren, Haaretz
(115) The Baghdad Cathedral Massacre: Zionist Fingerprints All Over by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(116) The Other Side Of Deception: A Rogue Agent Exposes The Mossad’s Secret Agenda by Victor Ostrovsky
(117) 7/7 Ripple Effect (documentary) by John Hill
(118) Lockerbie Was Mossad ‘False Flag’ Operation by Rehmat’s World
(119) Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi by INNOCENT
(120) Deception Over Lockerbie by Maidhc O Cathail
(121) The Reality Of Zionism by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(122) Turkey’s Intel Severs Ties With Mossad by UPI
(123) Turkey Decides To Cancel Three Military Exercises With Israel by Xinhua English
(124) Ahmet Davutoglu: ‘We Are A Part Of The West’ by Newsweek
(125) Turkey Defends Hezbollah Against STL by Press TV
(126) Erdogan: Israel To Lose Closest Ally by The Jerusalem Post 
(127) Israeli Mossad Accused Of Attempting To Assassinate Erdogan by The European Union Times
(128) Turkish PM Reiterates Demand For Israel’s Apology, Compensation by Xinhua English
(129) Why We Need Turkey by Zvi Bar’el, Haaretz
(130) Turkey To Normalize Ties If Gaza Blockade Ends by Reuters
(131) Erdogan’s Visit To Lebanon And Calling On Israel To Apologize And Halt The Inflammatory by Mohamed Abd el Fattah, All Voices
(132) Erdogan Denies Genocide, Links Karabakh To Armenia Ties On Prime Time TV by Asbarez Armenian News
(133) Erdogan Accuses Armenians Of ‘Exterminating’ Turks by Asbarez Armenian News
(134) The Armenian Genocide: 90 Years Later Turkey Continues To Deny The Extermination Of A People by DemocracyNow!
(135) ADL’s Abe Foxman Disputes Criticism On Armenian Genocide Position by Armen Carapetian, Armenian National Committee
(136) Palmerston Launches Young Turks To Permanently Control Middle East by Joseph Brewda, The Schiller Institute
(137) When Kemal Ataturk Recited Shema Yisrael by Hillel Halkin, The Jewish Daily Forward
(138) Turkey’s Charismatic Pro-Islamic Leader by BBC News
(139) Armenians Protest Erdogan’s Visit: We Haven’t Forgotten Yet by Al-Manar
(140) Wikileaks Release To Show NATO Ally Turkey Helped Al Qaeda In Iraq by Reuters
(141) Turkey’s Erdogan Slams Wikileaks Cables As Slander by Ayla Jean Yackley, Reuters
(142) The Power Of Nightmares: The Rise Of The Politics Of Fear (documentary) by BBC News
(143) Facing Fires, Israel Appeals For Help by Ethan Bronner, The New York Times
(144) Official Says Israel, Turkey In Talks To Mend Ties by The Associated Press
(145) J’lem, Turkey May Find Resolution To Flotilla Legal Issues by Herb Keinon, The Jerusalem Post; Israel Likely To Offer Heavy ‘Humanitarian’ Compensation Over Turkey Flotilla Deaths by Barak Ravid, Haaretz
(146) Turkish Official: Israel Initiated Massive Leak by Ynet News
(147) Mossad, MI6, The CIA And The Case Of The Assassinated Scientist by Yossi Melman, The Independent
(148) Netanyahu: Wikileaks Cables Prove Israel Is Right On Iran by Barak Ravid, Haaretz
(149) Gulf States Discuss Iran Following Wikileaks Revelations by David Miller, The Jerusalem Post
(150) Cable 09ASHGABAT757: Iran Post-Election: [Source Removed] Calls by Wikileaks
(151) Wikileaks’ ‘Cablegate’ Dump: 10 Biggest Revelations by The Week
(152) Cable 09ASHGABAT218: Turkmenistan/Iran: Weapons Found Hidden In Iranian by Wikileaks
(153) Wikileaks ‘Cablegate’ Shows How Iran Troubles The World by Samyuktha Krishnappa, International Business Times; Wikileaks Reveals Nuclear Secrets Of Both NATO and Iran by The Associated Press
(154) Wikileaks Cablegate: Iran Saw Pakistan As A Nuclear-Weapons Competitor Says Lavrov by Frontier India
(155) Ahmadinejad Congratulated On His Landslide Victory by Al-Manar; Iranian Elections: The ‘Stolen Elections’ Hoax by Professor James Petras, Global Research
(156) Demonizing Iranian Democracy by Dr. Elias Akleh, The People’s Voice; US Likely Source Of Interference In Iran’s Election by John Chuckman
(157) You Provide The Tweets, We’ll Provide The Info War – The Iranian Protests And The Mainstream Media by Jack Z. Bratich 
(158) Facebook, Twitter, Israel’s New Battle Ground by Press TV
(159) The Myth Of A Shia/Sunni-Persian-Arab Confrontation by Arshin Adib-Moghaddam, Antiwar.com
(160) Sayyed Nasrallah’s Speech Gave Momentum To Saudi-Syrian Efforts by Ahlul Bayt News Agency
(161) Wikileaks Claims Are ‘Psychological Warfare’ Says Ahmadinejad by Ian Black, The Guardian
(162) Wikileaks Seek To Create Discord In The Region by Iran Review
(163) ‘Wikileaks Unable To Shake Iran Ties’ by Press TV
(164) U.S. Announces New Iran Sanctions by Borzou Daragahi, The Los Angeles Times
(165) Time: Mossad Behind Iran Hit? By Press TV
(166) Playing The Never Again Card, Again by Jeff Gates, Veterans Today
(167) The Impotence Of The Pan-Semitic Front by Jeffrey Goldberg, The Atlantic
(168) Wikileaks Builds Case Against Iran by David Frum, CNN
(169) Much Ado About Nothing? – The Anti-Empire Report by William Blum
(170) Jundullah’s Links To Al Qaeda And The CIA by Aangirfan
(171) Hezbollah Spices Up Israel-Iran Mix by Kaveh L. Afrasiabi, The Asia Times
(172) Iranian Nuclear Scientist ‘Assassinated By Mossad’ by Sarah Baxter, The Sunday Times
(173) ‘Iran Skyjacking Plot Launched In Israel’ by Press TV
(174) Security Experts Suggest That Stuxnet Originated In Israel by Zero Hedge
(175) US, Israel Behind Cyber Attack On Iran? by Press TV; Stuxnet Virus Traced To Israel: ‘Everything Before Was Kid’s Stuff’ by The World Tribune
(176) Former Pakistani General: CIA, Mossad Behind Wikileaks Reports by Fars News Agency
(177) Click And Dagger: Inside Wikileaks’ Leak Factory by David Kushner, Mother Jones
(178) Exposed: Wikileaks’ Secrets by Annabel Symington, Wired
(179) Ben Laurie, Google by Dave Birch, Digital Identity Blog
(180) Google To Enlist NSA To Help It Ward Off Cyber Attacks by Ellen Nakashima, The Washington Post
(181) The Shadow Factory: The Ultra-Secret NSA From 9/11 To The Eavesdropping On America by James Bamford
(182) About IQT: History by In-Q-Tel
(183) Exclusive: Google, CIA Invest In ‘Future’ Of Web Monitoring by Noah Shachtman, Wired
(184) Zionism’s ZOA Pushes To Make All Campus Criticism Of Israel Illegal by James M. Wall, Veterans Today
(185) ZOA Praises Google For Removing False Anti-Israel Propaganda From Google Earth’s Map Of Israel by Morton Klein, Zionist Organization of America
(186) Google – Zionist Engine Of Mind And Genetic Control by Philip Jones
(187) CIA, Mossad and Soros Behind Wikileaks by Wayne Madsen, Pakistan Daily
(188) Israelis Hold Keys To NSA/US Military Computer Networks by Christopher Bollyn
(189) The Israeli Moles Who Controlled US Defense Computers On 9/11 by Christopher Bollyn
(190) Israeli Spying: The Mother Of All Scandals by What Really Happened
(191) CIA Operations In China—Another CIA Domestic OP? by Ralph McGehee 
(192) Wikileaks: Chinese Contact Claimed Beijing Hacked Google As Part Of Coordinated Computer Sabotage Program by David Gardner, Daily Mail
(193) Local Demonstrators Turn Out For Tibetans by Haley Edwards, The Seattle Times
(194) The Dalai Lama, George Soros And You by James Boyce, Intent Blog; George Soros, Imperial Wizard by Heather Coffin, Covert Action Quarterly
(195) CrisisWatch Database: China by International Crisis Group
(196) Risky Geopolitical Game: Washington Plays ‘Tibet Roulette’ With China by F. William Engdahl, Online Journal
(197) CIA Operations In China Part III by Ralph McGehee
(198) Wikileaks Reveal China’s Attempts To Limit His Holiness’ Movements by James Dunn, The Tibet Post
(199) Columnists: Phillip Adams by The Australian
(200) Newspapers And Information Services by News Corporation
(201) Media Magnate Rupert Murdoch, Accepting ADL Award, Calls For An End Of Efforts To Isolate Israel by The Anti-Defamation League
(202) Councilor Biographies: Francisco Whitaker by The World Future Council; Chico Whitaker Ferreira (Brazil) by The Right Livelihood Award
(203) About Us: Around The Globe by The World Future Council
(204) About Us: What We Are Proud Of by The World Future Council
(205) Global Warming? Or Global Governance? (documentary) by Sovereignty International
(206) Iraq: Massive Fraud And Corruption In Higher Education by Dirk Adriaensens, Global Research; Rampant Corruption Cited In Iraq’s Education System – 2004-07-26 by Voice of America News
(207) UNESCO: Iraqi Treasures Plundered by Professionals by Pravda English
(208) Judaism Discovered by Professor Michael Hoffman; Resistance Bomb Kills Zionists Stealing Archaeological Artifacts by Al-Basrah, translated by Muhammad Abu Nasr; Israel Hopes To Colonize Parts Of Iraq As ‘Greater Israel’ by Wayne Madsen, Online Journal; Claiming Jewish Communal Property In Iraq by Michael R. Fischbach, Israel-Kurd
(209) Philanthropy: For Women In Science by L’Oreal
(210) Boycott Israel Campaign: L’Oreal by Innovative Minds
(211) Bombs, Terrorism and Manure by Gordon Duff, Veterans Today
(212) US Govt Spy Program: Main Core, PROMIS And The Shadow Government Part I by Ed Encho, Oped News
(213) Obama Staffer Wants Cognitive Infiltration Of 9/11 Conspiracy Groups by Daniel Tencer, Raw Story
(214) Assange ‘To Meet’ UK Police by Al-Jazeera English
(215) Interpol Issues ‘Red Notice’ For Arrest Of Wikileaks’ Julian Assange by Kevin Poulsen, Wired
(216) Scotland Yard ‘Will Arrest Wanted Wikileaks Boss Today’ by The Daily Mail
(217) Assange Rape Charges Dropped by Radio France Internationale; Julian Assange Rape Charges Dropped, Wikileaks Founder Cleared by The San Francisco Chronicle
(218) Julian Assange, Wikileaks, Press Conference, Geneva, Switzerland by Notepad TV
(219) Israel Medical Association Defends Torture Doctors And Cuts Ties With Israel’s Physicians For Human Rights by Tony Greenstein; Correspondence: Interferons In Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis by The Lancet
(220) Not So Innocent – Index On Censorship Trustee Seeks To Silence Campaigner Against Torture by Tony Greenstein; Two Sides Of The Argument by Index On Censorship
(221) Pop Stars To Pensioners: Everyone Needs A Lawyer by Nicola Laver, The Times
(222) Circuit: The Wizard Of Oz Honored by Michael Aushenker, Jewish Journal; Does Hollywood Give Jewish? by Brad A. Greenberg, Jewish Journal
(223) Board And Chairmen by Robert Melson, Cambridge Forecast
(224) US Media’s Pro-Israel Bias: Response To The Freedom Flotilla Slaughter by Stephen Lendman
(225) Finers Wins Landmark Libel Ruling For Wall Street Journal by Joanne Harris, The Lawyer
(226) Waddeson Trust by Charity Performance; Mark Stephens: Media Lawyer by The Times
(227) Secrets Of The Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins (rip)
(228) Julian Assange by The Centre For Investigative Journalism
(229) Let The Bad Times Roll by Stephen Brook, The Guardian
(230) An Interview With Wikileaks’ Julian Assange by Andy Greenberg, Forbes
(231) Milton Friedman, 94, Free Market Theorist, Dies by Holcomb B. Noble, The New York Times
(232) Milton Friedman And Israel by The Jerusalem Post
(233) Don’t Shoot Messenger For Revealing Uncomfortable Truths by Julian Assange, The Australian
(234) Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch’s War On Journalism (documentary) by Robert Greenwald
(235) Media: Mr. Murdoch’s War by David D. Kirkpatrick, The New York Times
(236) TIME’s Julian Assange Interview: Full Transcript/Audio by Richard Stengel, TIME Magainze
(237) Spook, Terrorist Or Criminal? America’s Mysterious Files On Netanyahu by Neve Gordon, Washington Report On Middle East Affairs
(238) Busted!! Wikileaks Struck A Deal With Israel Over Cable Leaks by Gordon Duff, Veterans Today
(239) If We Lose Our Internet Freedoms Because Of Wikileaks, You Should At Least Know Why by Scott Creighton, Global Research
(240) No Secrets: Julian Assange’s Mission For Total Transparency by Raffi Khatchadourian, The New Yorker
(241) UN/AU Continues Somali Slaughter by Thomas C. Mountain, Counter Currents
(242) FTR #724 Wiki Of The Damned by Dave Emory, Spitfire List
(243) Ex-Mossad Agent Speaks Out Tells Of The Mossad-Australia Connection by New Dawn Magazine
(244) Wikileaks: “Patriot Act” Laws For The Internet by Eric Blair, Activist Post
(245) Exposed: 200 Israeli Army Officers Suspected Of War Crimes In Gaza by Nureddin Sabir, Redress
(246) Stolen Docs Expose Israeli War Crimes by Press TV
(247) Israel’s Ongoing War Against The Press by Michael Corcoran, Truth Out
(248) Journalist Accused Of Leaking Secret IDF Documents by Ron Ben-Yishai and Vered Luvitch, Ynet News
(249) Helen Thomas Says Zionists Control U.S. Foreign Policy by The Detroit Free Press
(250) Dark Alliance: The CIA, The Contras, And The Crack Cocaine Explosion by Gary Webb (rip)
(251) Political Assassination In The US: Did The CIA Kill Gary Webb? by Kurt Nimmo, Global Research
(252) The Octopus: Secret Government And The Death Of Danny Casolaro by Kenn Thomas and Jim Keith
(253) The River: A Journey To The Source Of HIV And AIDS by Edward Hooper
(254) Trance Formation Of America by Cathy O’Brien and Mark Phillips; Access Denied: For Reasons Of National Security by Cathy O’Brien and Mark Phillips
(255) Phillip Giraldi On Sibel, Turkey, Israel, The Neocons And The MIC by Scott Horton
(256) The Hour Of Our Time: The Legacy Of William Cooper (documentary) by Ether Films
(257) Hour Of The Time Transcripts ADL Expose 1-7 by Hour of The Time
(258) Wanted By The CIA: The Man Who Keeps No Secrets by Matthew Bell, The Independent
(259) Video: New 9/11 Photos ‘Prove WTC Exploded From Inside’ by Russia Today
(260) 9/11: Israel’s Grand Deception by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(261) Report: Bin Laden Treated At US Hospital by Elizabeth Bryant, UPI
(262) Julian Assange Wined And Dined At US Embassy by Andrew Gilligan, The Telegraph

A blueprint for Tyranny – Report from Iron Mountain


© see below (fair use)

Report report_from_iron_mountain.pdf

Report from Iron Mountain; Using fear to make people subservient to government.

***************

© 2002 by G. Edward Griffin

Freedom Force International

This is taken from Chapter 24 of The Creature from Jekyll Island

(When added to The Freedom Manifesto, this material should be expanded to include the concept of deliberate waste. With that included, it will make an excellent chapter.)

The substance of these stratagems [for the weakening of the United States so it can be more easily merged into a global government based on the model of collectivism] can be traced to a think-tank study released in 1966 called the Report from Iron Mountain. Although the origin of the report is highly debated, the document itself hints that it was commissioned by the Department of Defense under Defense Secretary, Robert McNamara and was produced by the Hudson Institute located at the base of Iron Mountain in Croton-on-Hudson, New York. The Hudson Institute was founded and directed by Herman Kahn, formerly of the Rand Corporation. Both McNamara and Kahn were members of the CFR.

The self-proclaimed purpose of the study was to explore various ways to “stabilize society.” Praiseworthy as that may sound, a reading of the Report soon reveals that the word society is used synonymously with the word government. Furthermore, the word stabilize is used as meaning to preserve and to perpetuate. It is clear from the start that the nature of the study was to analyze the different ways a government can perpetuate itself in power, ways to control its citizens and prevent them from rebelling. It was stated at the beginning of the Report that morality was not an issue. The study did not address questions of right or wrong; nor did it deal with such concepts as freedom or human rights. Ideology was not an issue, nor patriotism, nor religious precepts. Its sole concern was how to perpetuate the existing government. The Report said: 

Previous studies have taken the desirability of peace, the importance of human life, the superiority of democratic institutions, the greatest “good” for the greatest number, the “dignity” of the individual, the desirability of maximum health and longevity, and other such wishful premises as axiomatic values necessary for the justification of a study of peace issues. We have not found them so. We have attempted to apply the standards of physical science to our thinking, the principal characteristic of which is not quantification, as is popularly believed, but that, in Whitehead’s words, “…it ignores all judgments of value; for instance, all esthetic and moral judgments.” (1)

The major conclusion of the report was that, in the past, war has been the only reliable means to achieve that goal. It contends that only during times of war or the threat of war are the masses compliant enough to carry the yoke of government without complaint. Fear of conquest and pillage by an enemy can make almost any burden seem acceptable by comparison. War can be used to arouse human passion and patriotic feelings of loyalty to the nation’s leaders. No amount of sacrifice in the name of victory will be rejected. Resistance is viewed as treason. But, in times of peace, people become resentful of high taxes, shortages, and bureaucratic intervention. When they become disrespectful of their leaders, they become dangerous. No government has long survived without enemies and armed conflict. War, therefore, has been an indispensable condition for “stabilizing society.” These are the report’s exact words:

The war system not only has been essential to the existence of nations as independent political entities, but has been equally indispensable to their stable political structure. Without it, no government has ever been able to obtain acquiescence in its “legitimacy,” or right to rule its society. The possibility of war provides the sense of external necessity without which no government can long remain in power. The historical record reveals one instance after another where the failure of a regime to maintain the credibility of a war threat led to its dissolution, by the forces of private interest, of reactions to social injustice, or of other disintegrative elements. The organization of society for the possibility of war is its principal political stabilizer…. It has enabled societies to maintain necessary class distinctions, and it has insured the subordination of the citizens to the state by virtue of the residual war powers inherent in the concept of nationhood. (2)

A NEW DEFINITION OF PEACE

The report then explains that we are approaching a point in history where the old formulas may no longer work. Why? Because it may now be possible to create a world government in which all nations will be disarmed and disciplined by a world army, a condition which will be called peace. The report says: “The word peace, as we have used it in the following pages, … implies total and general disarmament.” (3)

Under that scenario, independent nations will no longer exist and governments will not have the capability to wage war. There could be military action by the world army against renegade political subdivisions, but these would be called peace-keeping operations, and soldiers would be called peace keepers. No matter how much property is destroyed or how much blood is spilled, the bullets will be “peaceful” bullets and the bombs – even atomic bombs, if necessary – will be “peaceful” bombs.

The report then raises the question of whether there can ever be a suitable substitute for war. What else could the regional governments use – and what could the world government itself use – to legitimize and perpetuate itself? To provide an answer to that question was the stated purpose of the study.

The Report from Iron Mountain concludes that there can be no substitute for war unless it possesses three properties. It must (1) be economically wasteful, (2) represent a credible threat of great magnitude, and (3) provide a logical excuse for compulsory service to the government.

A SOPHISTICATED FORM OF SLAVERY

On the subject of compulsory service, the Report explains that one of the advantages of standing armies is that they provide a place for the government to put antisocial and dissident elements of society. In the absence of war, these forced-labor battalions would be told they are fighting poverty or cleaning up the planet or bolstering the economy or serving the common good in some other fashion. Every teenager would be required to serve – especially during those years in which young people are most rebellious against authority. Older people, too, would be drafted as a means of working off tax payments and fines. Dissidents would face heavy fines for “hate crimes” and politically incorrect attitudes so, eventually, they would all be in the forced-labor battalions. The Report says:

We will examine … the time-honored use of military institutions to provide anti-social elements with an acceptable role in the social structure. … The current euphemistic clichés – “juvenile delinquency” and “alienation” – have had their counterparts in every age. In earlier days these conditions were dealt with directly by the military without the complications of due process, usually through press gangs or outright enslavement. …

Most proposals that address themselves, explicitly or otherwise, to the postwar problem of controlling the socially alienated turn to some variant of the Peace Corps or the so-called Job Corps for a solution. The socially disaffected, the economically unprepared, the psychologically uncomfortable, the hard-core “delinquents,” the incorrigible “subversives,” and the rest of the unemployable are seen as somehow transformed by the disciplines of a service modeled on military precedent into more or less dedicated social service workers. …

Another possible surrogate for the control of potential enemies of society is the reintroduction, in some form consistent with modern technology and political processes, of slavery. … It is entirely possible that the development of a sophisticated form of slavery may be an absolute prerequisite for socialcontrol in a world at peace. As a practical matter, conversion of the code of military discipline to a euphemized form of enslavement would entail surprisingly little revision; the logical first step would be the adoption of some form of “universal” military service. (4)

BLOOD GAMES

The Report considered ways in which the public could be preoccupied with non-important activities so that it would not have time to participate in political debate or resistance. Recreation, trivial game shows, pornography, and situation comedies could play an important role, but blood games were considered to be the most promising of all the options. Blood games are competitive events between individuals or teams that are sufficiently violent in nature to enable the spectators to vicariously work off their frustrations. As a minimum, these events must evoke a passionate team loyalty on the part of the fans and must include the expectation of pain and injury on the part of the players. Even better for their purpose is the spilling of blood and the possibility of death. The common man has a morbid fascination for violence and blood. Crowds gather to chant “Jump! Jump!” at the suicidal figure on a hotel roof. Cars slow to a near stop on the highway to gawk at broken bodies next to a collision.

A schoolyard fight instantly draws a circle of spectators. Boxing matches and football games and hockey games and automobile races are telecast daily, attracting millions of cheering fans who give rapt attention to each moment of danger, each angry blow to the face, each broken bone, each knockout, each carrying away of the unconscious or possibly dying contestant. In this fashion, their anger at “society” is defused and focused, instead, on the opposing team. The emperors of Rome devised the Circuses and gladiator contests and public executions by wild beasts for precisely that purpose.

Before jumping to the conclusion that such concepts are absurd in modern times, recall that during the 1985 European soccer championship in Belgium, the spectators became so emotionally involved in the contest that a bloody riot broke out in the bleachers leaving behind 38 dead and more that 400 injured. U.S. News & World Report gives this account:

The root of the trouble: A tribal loyalty to home teams that surpasses an obsession and, say some experts, has become a substitute religion for many. The worst offenders include members of gangs such as Chelsea’s Anti-Personnel Firm, made up of ill-educated young males who find in soccer rivalry an escape from boredom.

Still, the British do not have a patent on soccer violence. On May 26, eight people were killed and more than 50 injured in Mexico City,… a 1964 stadium riot in Lima, Peru, killed more than 300 – and a hotly disputed 1969 match between El Salvador and Honduras led to a week-long shooting war between the two countries, causing hundreds of casualties.

The U.S. is criticized for the gridiron violence of its favorite sport, football, but outbursts in the bleachers are rare because loyalties are spread among many sports and national pride is not at stake. Said Thomas Tutko, professor of psychology at California’s San Jose State University: “In these other countries, it used to be their armies. Now it’s their competitive teams that stir passions.” (5)

Having considered all the ramifications of blood games, The Report from Iron Mountain concluded that they were not an adequate substitute for war. It is true that violent sports are useful distracters and do, in fact, allow an outlet for boredom and fierce group loyalty, but their effect on the nation’s psyche could not match the intensity of war hysteria. Until a better alternative could be found, world government would have to be postponed so that nations could continue to wage war.

FINDING A CREDIBLE GLOBAL THREAT

In time of war, most citizens uncomplainingly accept their low quality of life and remain fiercely loyal to their leaders. If a suitable substitute for war is to be found, then it must also elicit that same reaction. Therefore, a new enemy must be found that threatens the entire world, and the prospects of being overcome by that enemy must be just as terrifying as war itself. The Report is emphatic on that point:

Allegiance requires a cause; a cause requires an enemy. This much is obvious; the critical point is that the enemy that defines the cause must seem genuinely formidable. Roughly speaking, the presumed power of the “enemy” sufficient to warrant an individual sense of allegiance to a society must be proportionate to the size and complexity of the society. Today, of course, that power must be one of unprecedented magnitude and frightfulness. (6)

The first consideration in finding a suitable threat to serve as a global enemy was that it did not have to be real. A real one would be better, of course, but an invented one would work just as well, provided the masses could be convinced it was real. The public will more readily believe some fictions than others. Credibility would be more important than truth.

Poverty was examined as a potential global enemy but rejected as not fearful enough. Most of the world was already in poverty. Only those who had never experienced poverty would see it as a global threat. For the rest, it was simply a fact of everyday life.

An invasion by aliens from outer space was given serious consideration. The report said that experiments along those lines already may have been tried. Public reaction, however, was not sufficiently predictable, because the threat was not “credible.” Here is what the report had to say:

Credibility, in fact, lies at the heart of the problem of developing a political substitute for war. This is where the space-race proposals, in many ways so well suited as economic substitutes for war, fall short. The most ambitious and unrealistic space project cannot of itself generate a believable external menace. It has been hotly argued that such a menace would offer the “last best hope of peace,” etc., by uniting mankind against the danger of destruction by “creatures” from other planets or from outer space. Experiments have been proposed to test the credibility of an out-of-our-world invasion threat; it is possible that a few of the more difficult-to-explain “flying saucer” incidents of recent years were in fact early experiments of this kind. If so, they could hardly have been judged encouraging. (7)

This report was released in 1966 when the idea of an alien presence seemed far fetched to the average person. In the ensuing years, however, that perception has changed. A growing segment of the population now believes that intelligent life forms may exist beyond our planet and could be monitoring our own civilization. Whether that belief is right or wrong is not the issue here. The point is that a dramatic encounter with aliens shown on network television – even if it were to be entirely fabricated by high-tech computer graphics or laser shows in the sky – could be used to stampede all nations into world government supposedly to defend the Earth from invasion. On the other hand, if the aliens were perceived to have peaceful intent, an alternative scenario would be to form world government to represent a unified human species speaking with a single voice in some kind of galactic federation. Either scenario would be far more credible today than in 1966.

THE ENVIRONMENTAL-POLLUTION MODEL

The final candidate for a useful global threat was pollution of the environment. This was viewed as the most likely to succeed because it could be related to observable conditions such as smog and water pollution– in other words, it would be based partly on fact and, therefore, be credible. Predictions could be made showing end-of-earth scenarios just as horrible as atomic warfare. Accuracy in these predictions would not be important. Their purpose would be to frighten, not to inform. It might even be necessary to deliberately poison the environment to make the predictions more convincing and to focus the public mind on fighting a new enemy, more fearful than any invader from another nation – or even from outer space. The masses would more willingly accept a falling standard of living, tax increases, and bureaucratic intervention in their lives as simply “the price we must pay to save Mother Earth.” A massive battle against death and destruction from global pollution possibly could replace war as justification for social control.

Did The Report from Iron Mountain really say that? It certainly did – and much more. Here are just a few of the pertinent passages:

When it comes to postulating a credible substitute for war … the “alternate enemy” must imply a more immediate, tangible, and directly felt threat of destruction. It must justify the need for taking and paying a “blood price” in wide areas of human concern. In this respect, the possible substitute enemies noted earlier would be insufficient. One exception might be the environmental-pollution model, if the danger to society it posed was genuinely imminent. The fictive models would have to carry the weight of extraordinary conviction, underscored with a not inconsiderable actual sacrifice of life. … It may be, for instance, that gross pollution of the environment can eventually replace the possibility of mass destruction by nuclear weapons as the principal apparent threat to the survival of the species. Poisoning of the air, and of the principal sources of food and water supply, is already well advanced, and at first glance would seem promising in this respect; it constitutes a threat that can be dealt with only through social organization and political power. …

It is true that the rate of pollution could be increased selectively for this purpose. … But the pollution problem has been so widely publicized in recent years that it seems highly improbable that a program of deliberate environmental poisoning could be implemented in a politically acceptable manner.

However unlikely some of the possible alternative enemies we have mentioned may seem, we must emphasize that one must be found of credible quality and magnitude, if a transition to peace is ever to come about without social disintegration. It is more probable, in our judgment, that such a threat will have to be invented. (8)

AUTHENTICITY OF THE REPORT

The Report from Iron Mountain states that it was produced by a Special Study Group of fifteen men whose identities were to remain secret and that it was not intended to be made public. One member of the group, however, felt the Report was too important to be kept under wraps. He was not in disagreement with its conclusions. He merely believed that more people should read it. He delivered his personal copy to Leonard Lewin, a well-known author and columnist who, in turn, negotiated its publication by Dial Press. It was then reprinted by Dell Publishing.

This was during the Johnson Administration, and the President’s Special Assistant for National Security Affairs was CFR member Walt Rostow. Rostow was quick to announce that the report was a spurious work. Herman Kahn, CFR director of the Hudson Institute, said it was not authentic. The Washington Post – which was owned and run by CFR member Katharine Graham – called it “a delightful satire.” Time magazine, founded by CFR-member Henry Luce, said it was a skillful hoax.

Then, on November 26, 1967, the Report was reviewed in the book section of the Washington Post by Herschel McLandress, which was the pen name for Harvard professor John Kenneth Galbraith. Galbraith, who also had been a member of the CFR, said that he knew firsthand of the Report’s authenticity because he had been invited to participate in it. Although he was unable to be part of the official group, he was consulted from time to time and had been asked to keep the project a secret. Furthermore, while he doubted the wisdom of letting the public know about the Report, he agreed totally with its conclusions. He wrote:

As I would put my personal repute behind the authenticity of this document, so would I testify to the validity of its conclusions. My reservations relate only to the wisdom of releasing it to an obviously unconditioned public. (9)

Six weeks later, in an Associated Press dispatch from London, Galbraith went even further and jokingly admitted that he was “a member of the conspiracy.”(10)

That, however, did not settle the issue. The following day, Galbraith backed off. When asked about his “conspiracy” statement, he replied: “For the first time since Charles II The Times has been guilty of a misquotation. … Nothing shakes my conviction that it was written by either Dean Rusk or Mrs. Clare Booth Luce.” (11)

The reporter who conducted the original interview was embarrassed by the allegation and did further research. Six days later, this is what he reported: Misquoting seems to be a hazard to which Professor Galbraith is prone. The latest edition of the Cambridge newspaper Varsity quotes the following (tape recorded) interchange:

Interviewer: “Are you aware of the identity of the author of Report from Iron Mountain?”

Galbraith: “I was in general a member of the conspiracy but I was not the author. I have always assumed that it was the man who wrote the foreword – Mr. Lewin.” (12)

So, on at least three occasions, Galbraith publicly endorsed the authenticity of the Report but denied that he wrote it. Then who did? Was it Leonard Lewin, after all? In 1967 he said he did not. In 1972 he said that he did. Writing in The New York Times Book Review Lewin explained: “I wrote the ‘Report,” all of it. … What I intended was simply to pose the issues of war and peace in a provocative way.” (13)

But wait! A few years before that, columnist William F. Buckley told the New York Times that he was the author. That statement was undoubtedly made tongue-in-cheek, but who and what are we to believe? Was it written by Herman Kahn, John Kenneth Galbraith, Dean Rusk, Clare Booth Luce, Leonard Lewin, or William F. Buckley?

In the final analysis, it makes little difference. The important point is that The Report from Iron Mountain, whether written as a think-tank study or a political satire, explains the reality that surrounds us. Regardless of its origin, the concepts presented in it are now being implemented in almost every detail. All one has to do is hold the Report in one hand and the daily newspaper in the other to realize that every major trend in American life is conforming to the blueprint. So many things that otherwise are incomprehensible suddenly become clear: foreign aid, wasteful spending, the destruction of American industry, a job corps, gun control, a national police force, the apparent demise of Soviet power, a UN army, disarmament, a world bank, a world money, the surrender of national independence through treaties, and the ecology hysteria. The Report from Iron Mountain is an accurate summary of the plan that has already created our present. It is now shaping our future.

ENVIRONMENTALISM A SUBSTITUTE FOR WAR

It is beyond the scope of this study to prove that currently accepted predictions of environmental doom are based on exaggerated and fraudulent “scientific studies.” But such proof is easily found if one is willing to look at the raw data and the assumptions upon which the projections are based. More important, however, is the question of why end-of-world scenarios based on phony scientific studies – or no studies at all – are uncritically publicized by the CFR-controlled media; or why radical environmental groups advocating collectivist doctrine and anti-business programs are lavishly funded by CFR-dominated foundations, banks, and corporations, the very groups that would appear to have the most to lose. The Report from Iron Mountain answers those questions.

As the Report pointed out, truth is not important in these matters. It’s what people can be made to believe that counts. “Credibility” is the key, not reality. There is just enough truth in the fact of environmental pollution to make predictions of planetary doom in the year two-thousand-something seem believable. All that is required is media cooperation and repetition. The plan has apparently worked. People of the industrialized nations have been subjected to a barrage of documentaries, dramas, feature films, ballads, poems, bumper stickers, posters, marches, speeches, seminars, conferences, and concerts. The result has been phenomenal. Politicians are now elected to office on platforms consisting of nothing more than an expressed concern for the environment and a promise to clamp down on those nasty industries. No one questions the damage done to the economy or the nation. It makes no difference when the very planet on which we live is sick and dying. Not one in a thousand will question that underlying premise. How could it be false? Look at all the movie celebrities and rock stars who have joined the movement.

While the followers of the environmental movement are preoccupied with visions of planetary doom, let us see what the leaders are thinking. The first Earth Day was proclaimed on April 22, 1970, at a “Summit” meeting in Rio de Janeiro, attended by environmentalists and politicians from all over the world. A publication widely circulated at that meeting was entitled the Environmental Handbook. The main theme of the book was summarized by a quotation from Princeton Professor Richard A. Falk, a member of the CFR. Falk wrote that there are four interconnected threats to the planet – wars of mass destruction, overpopulation, pollution, and the depletion of resources. Then he said: “The basis of all four problems is the inadequacy of the sovereign states to manage the affairs of mankind in the twentieth century.” (14)

The Handbook continued the CFR line by asking these rhetorical questions: “Are nation-states actually feasible, now that they have power to destroy each other in a single afternoon?… What price would most people be willing to pay for a more durable kind of human organization – more taxes, giving up national flags, perhaps the sacrifice of some of our hard-won liberties?” (15)

In 1989, the CFR-owned Washington Post published an article written by CFR member George Kennan in which he said: “We must prepare instead for … an age where the great enemy is not the Soviet Union, but the rapid deterioration of our planet as a supporting structure for civilized life.” (16)

On March 27, 1990, in the CFR-controlled New York Times, CFR member Michael Oppenheimer wrote: “Global warming, ozone depletion, deforestation and overpopulation are the four horsemen of a looming 21st century apocalypse. … as the cold war recedes, the environment is becoming the No. 1 international security concern.” (17)

CFR member, Lester Brown, heads up another think tank called the Worldwatch Institute. In the Institute’s annual report, entitled State of the World 1991, Brown said that “the battle to save the planet will replace the battle over ideology as the organizing theme of the new world order.” (18)

In the official publication of the 1992 Earth Summit, we find this: “The world community now faces together greater risks to our common security through our impacts on the environment than from traditional military conflicts with one another.”

How many times does it have to be explained? The environmental movement was created by the CFR. It is a substitute for war that they hope will become the emotional and psychological foundation for world government.

HUMANITY ITSELF IS THE TARGET

The Club of Rome is a group of global planners who annually release end-of-world scenarios based on predictions of overpopulation and famine. Their membership is international, but the American roster includes such well-known CFR members as Jimmy Carter, Harlan Cleveland, Claiburne Pell, and Sol Linowitz. Their solution to overpopulation? A world government to control birth rates and, if necessary, euthanasia. That is a gentle word for the deliberate killing of the old, the weak, and of course the uncooperative. Following the same reasoning advanced at Iron Mountain, the Club of Rome has concluded that fear of environmental disaster could be used as a substitute enemy for the purpose of unifying the masses behind its program. In its 1991 book entitled The First Global Revolution, we find this:

In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. … All these dangers are caused by human intervention. … The real enemy, then, is humanity itself. (19)

Collectivist theoreticians have always been fascinated by the possibility of controlling population growth. It excites their imaginations because it is the ultimate bureaucratic plan. If the real enemy is humanity itself, as the Club of Rome says, then humanity itself must become the target. Fabian Socialist Bertrand Russell expressed it thus:

I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. … War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. …

A scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is world government. … It will be necessary to find ways of preventing an increase in world population. If this is to be done otherwise than by wars, pestilences and famines, it will demand a powerful international authority. This authority should deal out the world’s food to the various nations in proportion to their population at the time of the establishments of the authority. If any nation subsequently increased its population, it should not on that account receive any more food. The motive for not increasing population would therefore be very compelling. (21)

Very compelling, indeed. These quiet-spoken collectivists are not kidding around. For example, one of the most visible “environmentalists” and advocate of population control was Jacques Cousteau. Interviewed by the United Nations UNESCO Courier in November of 1991, Cousteau spelled it out. He said:

What should we do to eliminate suffering and disease? It is a wonderful idea but perhaps not altogether a beneficial one in the long run. If we try to implement it we may jeopardize the future of our species. It’s terrible to have to say this. World population must be stabilized, and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. This is so horrible to contemplate that we shouldn’t even say it, but it is just as bad not to say it. (22)

GORBACHEV BECOMES AN ECOLOGY WARRIOR

We can now understand how Mikhail Gorbachev, formerly the leader of one of the most repressive governments the world has known, became head of a new organization called the International Green Cross, which supposedly is dedicated to environmental issues. Gorbachev has never denounced collectivism, only the label of a particular brand of collectivism called Communism. His real interest is not ecology but world government with himself assured a major position in the collectivist power structure. In a public appearance in Fulton, Missouri, he praised the Club of Rome, of which he is a member, for its position on population control. Then he said:

One of the worst of the new dangers is ecological. … Today, global climatic shifts; the greenhouse effect; the “ozone hole”; acid rain; contamination of the atmosphere, soil and water by industrial and household waste; the destruction of the forests; etc. all threaten the stability of the planet. (23)

Gorbachev proclaimed that global government was the answer to these threats and that the use of government force was essential. He said: “I believe that the new world order will not be fully realized unless the United Nations and its Security Council create structures … authorized to impose sanctions and make use of other measures of compulsion.” (24)

Here is an arch criminal who fought his way up through the ranks of the Soviet Communist Party, became the protégé of Yuri Andropov, head of the dreaded KGB, was a member of the USSR’s ruling Politburo throughout the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and who was selected by the Politburo in 1985 as the supreme leader of world Communism. All of this was during one of the Soviet’s most dismal periods of human-rights violations and subversive activities against the free world. Furthermore, he ruled over a nation with one of the worst possible records of environmental destruction. At no time while he was in power did he ever say or do anything to show concern over planet Earth.

All that is now forgotten. Gorbachev has been transformed by the CFR-dominated media into an ecology warrior. He is calling for world government and telling us that such a government will use environmental issues as justification for sanctions and other “measures of compulsion.” We cannot say that we were not warned.

U.S. BRANDED AS ECOLOGICAL AGGRESSOR

The use of compulsion is an important point in these plans. People in the industrialized nations are not expected to cooperate in their own demise. They will have to be forced. They will not like it when their food is taken for global distribution. They will not approve when they are taxed by a world authority to finance foreign political projects. They will not voluntarily give up their cars or resettle into smaller houses or communal barracks to satisfy the resource-allocation quotas of a UN agency. Club-of-Rome member Maurice Strong states the problem:

In effect, the United States is committing environmental aggression against the rest of the world. … At the military level, the United States is the custodian. At the environmental level, the United States is clearly the greatest risk. … One of the worst problems in the United States is energy prices – they’re too low. …

It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class … involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and `convenience’ foods, ownership of motor-vehicles, numerous electric household appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning … expansive suburban housing … are not sustainable. (25)

Mr. Strong’s remarks were enthusiastically received by world environmental leaders, but they prompted this angry editorial response in the Arizona Republic:

Translated from eco-speak, this means two things: (1) a reduction in the standard of living in Western nations through massive new taxes and regulations, and (2) a wholesale transfer of wealth from industrialized to under-developed countries. The dubious premise here is that if the U.S. economy could be reduced to, say, the size of Malaysia’s, the world would be a better place. … Most Americans probably would balk at the idea of the U.N. banning automobiles in the U.S. (26)

Who is this Maurice Strong who sees the United States as the environmental aggressor against the world? Does he live in poverty? Does he come from a backward country that is resentful of American prosperity? Does he himself live in modest circumstances, avoiding consumption in order to preserve our natural resources? None of the above. He is one of the wealthiest men in the world. He lives and travels in great comfort. He is a lavish entertainer. In addition to having great personal wealth derived from the oil industry in Canada – which he helped nationalize – Maurice Strong was the Secretary-General of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio; head of the 1972 UN Conference on Human Environment in Stockholm; the first Secretary-General of the UN Environment Program; president of the World Federation of United Nations; co-chairman of the World Economic Forum; member of the Club of Rome; trustee of the Aspen Institute; and a director of the World Future Society. That is probably more than you wanted to know about this man, but it is necessary in order to appreciate the importance of what follows.

A PLOT FOR ECONOMIC CRISIS

Maurice Strong believes – or says that he believes – the world’s ecosystems can be preserved only if the affluent nations of the world can be disciplined into lowering their standard of living. Production and consumption must be curtailed. To bring that about, those nations must submit to rationing, taxation, and political domination by world government. They will probably not do that voluntarily, he says, so they will have to be forced. To accomplish that, it will be necessary to engineer a global monetary crisis which will destroy their economic systems. Then they will have no choice but to accept assistance and control from the UN.

This strategy was revealed in the May, 1990, issue of West magazine, published in Canada. In an article entitled “The Wizard of Baca Grande,” journalist Daniel Wood described his week-long experience at Strong’s private ranch in southern Colorado. This ranch has been visited by such CFR notables as David Rockefeller, Secretary-of-State Henry Kissinger, founder of the World Bank Robert McNamara, and the presidents of such organizations as IBM, Pan Am, and Harvard.

During Wood’s stay at the ranch, the tycoon talked freely about environmentalism and politics. To express his own world view, he said he was planning to write a novel about a group of world leaders who decided to save the planet. As the plot unfolded, it became obvious that it was based on real people and real events. Wood continues the story:

Each year, he explains as background to the telling of the novel’s plot, the World Economic Forum convenes in Davos, Switzerland. Over a thousand CEOs, prime ministers, finance ministers, and leading academics gather in February to attend meetings and set economic agendas for the year ahead. With this as a setting, he then says: “What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? … The group’s conclusion is `no.’ the rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about? …

This group of world leaders,” he continues, “form a secret society to bring about an economic collapse. It’s February. They’re all at Davos. These aren’t terrorists. They’re world leaders. They have positioned themselves in the world’s commodity and stock markets. They’ve engineered, using their access to stock exchanges and computers and gold supplies, a panic. Then, they prevent the world’s stock markets from closing. They jam the gears. They hire mercenaries who hold the rest of the world leaders at Davos as hostages. The markets can’t close. The rich countries…” And Strong makes a slight motion with his fingers as if he were flicking a cigarette butt out the window.

I sit there spellbound. This is not any storyteller talking, this is Maurice Strong. He knows these world leaders. He is, in fact, co-chairman of the Council of the World Economic Forum. He sits at the fulcrum of power. He is in a position to do it.“I probably shouldn’t be saying things like this,” he says. (27)

Maurice Strong’s fanciful plot probably shouldn’t be taken too seriously, at least in terms of a literal reading of future events. It is unlikely they will unfold in exactly that manner – although it is not impossible. For one thing, it would not be necessary to hold the leaders of the industrialized nations at gun point. They would be the ones engineering this plot. Leaders from Third-World countries do not have the means to cause a global crisis. That would have to come from the money centers in New York, London, or Tokyo. Furthermore, the masterminds behind this thrust for global government have always resided in the industrialized nations. They have come from the ranks of the CFR in America and from other branches of the International Roundtable in England, France, Belgium, Canada, Japan, and elsewhere. They are the ideological descendants of Cecil Rhodes and they are fulfilling his dream.

It is not important whether or not Maurice Strong’s plot for global economic collapse is to be taken literally. What is important is that men like him are thinking along those lines. As Wood pointed out, they are in a position to do it. Or something like it. If it is not this scenario, they will consider another one with similar consequences. If history has proven anything, it is that men with financial and political power are quite capable of heinous plots against their fellow men. They have launched wars, caused depressions, and created famines to suit their personal agendas. We have little reason to believe that the world leaders of today are more saintly than their predecessors.

Furthermore, we must not be fooled by pretended concern for Mother Earth. The call-to-arms for saving the planet is a gigantic ruse. There is just enough truth to environmental pollution to make the show “credible,” as The Report from Iron Mountain phrased it, but the end-of-earth scenarios which drive the movement forward are bogus. The real objective in all of this is world government, the ultimate doomsday mechanism from which there can be no escape. Destruction of the economic strength of the industrialized nations is merely a necessary prerequisite for ensnaring them into the global web. The thrust of the current ecology movement is directed totally to that end.

***********

by G. Edward Griffin.

It may be obtained at www.realityzone.com.

References:

1

Leonard Lewin, ed., Report from Iron Mountain on the possibility and the Desirability of Peace

(New York: Dell Publishing, 1976), pp.13-14.

2

Ibid. pp. 39, 81.

3

Ibid. p. 9. 3

4

Ibid., pp. 41-42,68, 70.

5

“British Soccer’s Day of Shame,” U.S. News & World Report, June 10, 1985, p. 11.

6

Lewin, Report, p. 44. 6

7

Ibid., p. 66. 7

8

Ibid., pp. 66-67, 70-71. When the Report was written, terrorism had not yet been considered as a substitute for war. Since then, it has become the most useful of them all.

9

“News of War and Peace You’re Not Ready For,” by Herschel McLandress, Book World, in The

Washington Post, Nov. 26, 1967, p. 5.

10

“The Times Diary,” London Times, Feb. 5, 1968, p.8.

11

“Galbraith Says He Was Misquoted, “ London Times, Feb. 6, 1968, p. 3.

12

“Touche, Professor,” London Times, Feb. 12, 1968, p, 8. 9

13

“Report from Iron Mountain,” New Your Times, March 19, 1968, p. 8. 10

14

Garrett de Bell, ed., The Environmental Handbook (New York: Ballantine / Friends of the Earth,

1970), p. 138.

15

Ibid., p. 145.

16

A Europe Now Free from A Confining Cold War Vision,” by George Kennan, (Washington Post

syndication, Sacramento Bee, Nov. 14, 1989, p. B7.

17

The New York Times has been one of the principal means by which CFR policies are inserted into

the mainstream of public opinion. The paper was purchased in 1896 by Alfred Ochs, with financial

backing from CFR pioneer J.P. Morgan, Rothchild agent August Belmont, and Jacob Schiff, a partner in Kuhn, Loeb & Co. It is now owned by CFR member Arthur Sulzberger, who is also the

publisher, and it is staffed by numerous CFR editors and columnists. See Shadows of Power by

James Perloff (Appleton, Wisconsin: Western Islands, 1988), p. 181.

18

Lester R. Brown, “The New World Order,” in Lester R. Brown et al., State of the World 1991; A

Worldwatch Institute Report on Progress Toward A Sustainable Society (New York: W.W. Norton,

1991), p. 3.

19

Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, The First Global Revolution, A Report by the Council of

the Club of Rome, (New York: Pantheon Books, 1991). P. 115.

20

See Martin, Rose, Fabian Freeway; High Road to Socialism in the U.S.A. (Boston: Western

Islands, 1966), pp. 171, 325, 463-69.

21

Bertrand Arthur William Russell, The Impact of Science on Society (New York: Simon and

Schuster, 1953), pp. 103-104, 111.

22

Interviewed by Bahgat Eluadi and Adel Rifaat, Courrier de l’Unesco, Nov. 1991, p. 13.

23

Michail Gorbachev, “The River of Time and the Necessity of Action,” 46thJohn Findley Greed

Foundation Lecture, Westminster College, Fulton, Missouri, May 6, 1992, transcript from

Westminster College Department of Press Relations, p. 6.

24

Ibid., p. 9. 14

25

“Ecology Remedy Costly,” (AP), Sacramento Bee, March 12, 1992, p. A8. Also Maurice Strong,

Introduction to Jim MacNeil, Pieter Winsemius, and Taizo Yakushiji, Beyond Interdependence,

(New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), p. ix.

26

“Road to Ruin,” Arizona Republic, March 26, 1992.

27

“The Wizard of Baca Grande.” By Daniel Wood, West magazine, May 1990, p. 35.


http://farmwars.info/?p=4881

Source

https://archive.org/details/ReportFromIronMountain135/page/n3