The Worldwide Network of us Military Bases

https://vids.theoven.lol/videoEmbed/1448/standing-army.-die-geheime-strategie-der-us-militärbasen?channelName=Anonymous

Great post filled with extremely valuable information!

“This article has focussed on the Worldwide development of US military power. The US tends to view the Earth surface as a vast territory to conquer, occupy and exploit. The fact that the US Military splits the World up into geographic command units vividly illustrates this underlying geopolitical reality. Humanity is being controlled and enslaved by this Network of US military bases.”

How can we really stop such a huge display of military force? Are pacific organisations & movements enough? All these figures are bone chilling! Not mentionning elements not in the public domaine..!!

For those who don’t believe in the global government agenda, this is an irrefutable proof to me.

The Worldwide Network of US Military Bases when being ANTI means being FOR human rights, coexistence and peace

The Worldwide control of humanity’s economic, social and political activities is under the helm of US corporate and military power. Underlying this process are various schemes of direct and indirect military intervention. These US sponsored strategies ultimately consist in a process of global subordination. Where is the Threat?
The 2000 Global Report published in 1980 had outlined “the State of the World” by focusing on so-called “level of threats” which might negatively influence or undermine US interests.
Twenty years later, US strategists, in an attempt to justify their military interventions in different parts of the World, have conceptualized the greatest fraud in US history, namely “the Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT). The latter, using a fabricated pretext constitutes a global war against all those who oppose US hegemony. A modern form of slavery, instrumented through militarization and the “free market” has unfolded.
Major elements of the conquest and world domination strategy by the US refer to:
1) the control of the world economy and its financial markets,
2) the taking over of all natural resources (primary resources and nonrenewable sources of energy). The latter constitute the cornerstone of US power through the activities of its multinational corporations.
Geopolitical Outreach: Network of Military Bases
The US has established its control over 191 governments which are members of the United Nations. The conquest, occupation and/or otherwise supervision of these various regions of the World is supported by an integrated network of military bases and installations which covers the entire Planet (Continents, Oceans and Outer Space). All this pertains to the workings of an extensive Empire, the exact dimensions of which are not always easy to ascertain.
Known and documented from information in the public domaine including Annual Reports of the US Congress, we have a fairly good understanding of the structure of US military expenditure, the network of US military bases and the shape of this US military-strategic configuration in different regions of the World.
The objective of this article is to build a summary profile of the World network of military bases, which are under the jurisdiction and/or control of the US. The spatial distribution of these military bases will be examined together with an analysis of the multibillion dollar annual cost of their activities.
In a second section of this article, Worldwide popular resistance movements directed against US military bases and their various projects will be outlined. In a further article we plan to analyze the military networks of other major nuclear superpowers including the United Kingdom, France and Russia.
II. More than 1000 US Bases and/or Military Installations
The main sources of information on these military installations (e.g. C. Johnson, the NATO Watch Committee, the International Network for the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases) reveal that the US operates and/or controls between 700 and 800 military bases Worldwide.
In this regard, Hugh d’Andrade and Bob Wing’s 2002 Map 1 entitled “U.S. Military Troops and Bases around the World, The Cost of ‘Permanent War’”, confirms the presence of US military personnel in 156 countries.
The US Military has bases in 63 countries. Brand new military bases have been built since September 11, 2001 in seven countries.
In total, there are 255,065 US military personnel deployed Worldwide.
These facilities include a total of 845,441 different buildings and equipments. The underlying land surface is of the order of 30 million acres. According to Gelman, who examined 2005 official Pentagon data, the US is thought to own a total of 737 bases in foreign lands. Adding to the bases inside U.S. Territory, the total land area occupied by US military bases domestically within the US and internationally is of the order of 2,202,735 hectares, which makes the Pentagon one of the largest landowners worldwide (Gelman, J., 2007).
Map 1. U.S. Military Troops and Bases around the World. The Cost of «Permanent War» and Some Comparative Data

Map 2. The American Military Bases Around the World (2001-2003)

Based on a selective examination of military bases in North America, Latin America, Western Europe, the Middle East, Central Asia, Indonesia, the Philippines and Japan, several of these military bases are being used for intelligence purposes. New selected sites are Spy Bases and Satellite-related Spy Bases.
The Surface of the Earth is Structured as a Wide Battlefield
These military bases and installations of various kinds are distributed according to a Command structure divided up into five spatial units and four unified Combatant Commands (Map 4). Each unit is under the Command of a General.
The Earth surface is being conceived as a wide battlefield which can be patrolled or steadfastly supervised from the Bases.

NATO Military Bases
The Atlantic Alliance (NATO) has its own Network of military bases, thirty in total. The latter are primarily located in Western Europe:
Whiteman, U.S.A., Fairford,
Lakenheath and Mildenhall in United Kingdom,
Eindhoven in Netherlands,
Brüggen, Geilenkirchen, Landsberg, Ramstein, Spangdahlem, Rhein-Main in Germany,
Istres and Avord in France.
Morón de la Frontera and Rota in Spain,
Brescia, Vicenza, Piacenza, Aviano, Istrana, Trapani, Ancora, Pratica di Mare, Amendola, Sigonella, Gioia dell Colle, Grazzanise and Brindisi in Italy,
Tirana in Albania,
Incirlik in Turkey,
Eskan Village in Soudi Arabia and
Ali al Salem in Kuwait

III. The Global Deployment of US Military Personnel
There are 6000 military bases and/ or military warehouses located in the U.S. (See Wikipedia, February 2007).
Total Military Personnel is of the order of 1,4 million of which 1,168,195 are in the U.S and US overseas territories.
Taking figures from the same source, there are 325,000 US military personnel in foreign countries:

1. – 800 in Africa,
– 97,000 in Asia (excluding the Middle East and Central Asia),
– 40,258 in South Korea,
– 40,045 in Japan,
– 491 at the Diego Garcia Base in the Indian Ocean,
– 100 in the Philippines, 196 in Singapore,
– 113 in Thailand,
– 200 in Australia,
and 16,601 Afloat.

In Europe, there are 116,000 US military personnel including 75,603 who are stationed in Germany.
In Central Asia about 1,000 are stationed at the Ganci (Manas) Air Base in Kyrgyzstan and 38 are located at Kritsanisi, in Georgia, with a mission to train Georgian soldiers.
In the Middle East (excluding the Iraq war theater) there are 6,000 US military personnel, 3,432 of whom are in Qatar and 1,496 in Bahrain.
In the Western Hemisphere, excluding the U.S. And US territories, there are 700 military personnel in Guantanamo, 413 in Honduras and 147 in Canada.
Map 3 provides information regarding military personnel on duty, based on a regional categorization (broad regions of the world). The total number of military personnel at home in the U.S. And/or in US Territories is 1,139,034. There are 1,825 in Europe 114, 660, 682 in Sub Saharian Africa, 4, 274 in the Middle East and Southern Asia, 143 in the Ex-USSR, and 89,846 in the Pacific.
IV. The Operational Cost of the Worldwide Military Network
US defense spending (excluding the costs of the Iraq war) have increased from 404 in 2001 to 626 billion dollars in 2007 according to data from the Washington based Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. US defense spending is expected to reach 640 billion dollars in 2008.
Center for Arms control
These 2006 expenses correspond to 3.7% of the US GDP and $935.64 per capita
Figure 1. U.S. Military Expenditures since 1998

Source : Global Issues
According to Fig 1, the 396 billion dollars military budget proposed in 2003 has in fact reached 417.4 billion dollars, a 73% increase compared to 2000 (289 billion dollars). This outlay for 2003 was more than half of the total of the US discretionary budget.
Since 2003, these military expenditures have to be added to those of the Iraq war and occupation The latter reached in March 2007, according to the National Priorities Project
, a cumulative total of 413 billion dollars.
US defense budget will equal ROW combined “within 12 months
Estimates of the Defense Department budget needs, made public in 2006 in the DoD Green Book for FY 2007 are of the order of 440 billion dollars.
Military and other staff required numbered 1,332,300. But those figures do not include the money required for the “Global World on Terrorism” (GWOT). In other words, these figures largely pertain to the regular Defense budget.
A Goldstein of the Washington Post, within the framework of an article on the aspects of the National 2007 budget titled «2007 Budget Favors Defense», wrote about this topic:
“Overall, the budget for the 2007 fiscal year would further reshape the government in the way the administration has been striving to during the past half-decade: building up military capacity and defenses against terrorist threats on U.S. Soil, while restraining expenditures for many domestic areas, from education programs to train service”
2007 Budget Favors Defense
V. US Military Bases to Protect Strategic Energy Resources
In the wake of 9/11, Washington initiated its “Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT), first in Afghanistan and then in Iraq. Other countries, which were not faithfully obeying Washington’s directives including Iran, North Korea, Syria and Venezuela have been earmarked for possible US military intervention.
Washington keeps a close eye on countries opposed to US corporate control over their resources. Washington also targets countries where there are popular resistance movements directed against US interests, particularly in South America. In this context, President Bush made a quick tour to Brazil, Uruguay, Colombia, Guatemala and Mexico «to promote democracy and trade» but also with a view to ultimately curbing and restraining popular dissent to the US interests in the region. .
VOA
The same broad approach is being applied in Central Asia. According to Iraklis Tsavdaridis, Secretary of the World Peace Council (WPC):
“The establishment of U.S. Military bases should not of course be seen simply in terms of direct military ends. They are always used to promote the economic and political objectives of U.S. Capitalism. For example, U.S. Corporations and the U.S. Government have been eager for some time to build a secure corridor for US.-controlled oil and natural gas pipelines from the Caspian Sea in Central Asia through Afghanistan and Pakistan to the Arabian Sea. This region -has more than 6 percent of the world’s proven oil reserves and almost 40 percent of its gas reserves. The war in Afghanistan and the creation of U.S. Military Bases in Central Asia are viewed as a key opportunity to make such pipelines a reality.”
Stop USA
The US. Are at War in Afghanistan and Iraq. They pursue these military operations until they reach their objective which they call “VICTORY”. According to Wikipedia, American troops fighting in these countries number 190,000. The “Enduring Freedom” Operation in Iraq alone has almost 200,000 military personnel, including 26,000 from other countries participating to the US sponsored “Mission”. About 20,000 more could join other contingents in the next few months. In Afghanistan, a total of 25,000 soldiers participate to the operation (Map 6 and Map 7).
Map 6. Petroleum and International Theater of War in the Middle East and Central Asia

Map 7. American Bases Located in Central Asia

VI. Military Bases Used for the Control of Strategic Renewable Resources
US Military Bases in foreign countries, are mainly located in Western Europe: 26 of them are in Germany, 8, in Great Britain, and 8 in Italy. There are nine military installations in Japan (Wikepedia).
In the last few years, in the context of the GWOT, the US haa built 14 new bases in and around the Persian Gulf.
It is also involved in construction and/or or reinforcement of 20 bases (106 structured units as a whole) in Iraq, with costs of the order of 1.1 billion dollars in that country alone (Varea, 2007) and the use of about ten bases in Central Asia.
The US has also undertaken continued negotiations with several countries to install, buy, enlarge or rent an addional number of military bases. The latter pertain inter alia to installations in Morocco, Algeria, Mali, Ghana, Brazil and Australia (See Nicholson, B., 2007), Poland, Czech Republic (Traynor, I., 2007), Ouzbekistan, Tadjikistan, Kirghizstan, Italy (Jucca, L., 2007) and France.
Washington has signed an agreement to build a military base in Djibouti (Manfredi, E., 2007). All these initiatives are a part of an overall plan to install a series of military bases geographically located in a West-East corridor extending from Colombia in South America, to North Africa, the Near East, Central Asia and as far as the Philippines (Johnson, C., 2004). The US bases in South American are related to the control and access to the extensive natural biological , mineral and water resources resources of the Amazon Basin. (Delgado Jara, D., 2006 and Maps 9 and 10).

VII. Resistance Movements
The network of US military bases is strategic, located in prcximity of traditional strategic resources including nonrenewable sources of energy. This military presence has brought about political opposition and resistance from progressive movements and antiwar activists.
Demonstrations directed against US military presence has developed in Spain, Ecuador, Italy, Paraguay, Uzbekistan, Bulgaria and in many other countries. Moreover, other long-termer resistance movements directed against US military presence have continued in South Korea, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Philippines, Cuba, Europe, Japan and other locations.
The Worldwide resistance to US foreign military bases has grown during the last few years. We are dealing with an International Network for the Abolition of US Military Bases.
Such networks’ objective is to broadly pursue disarmament, demilitarization processes Worldwide as well as dismantle US military bases in foreign countries.
The NO BASES Network organizes educational campaigns to sensitize public opinion. It also works to rehabilitate abandoned military sites, as in the case of Western Europe.
These campaigns, until 2004, had a local and national impact.
The network is now in a position to reach people Worldwide. The network itself underscores that “much can be gained from greater and deeper linkages among local and national campaigns and movements across the globe. Local groups around the world can learn and benefit from sharing information, experiences, and strategies with each other”
“The realisation that one is not alone in the struggle against foreign bases is profoundly empowering and motivating. Globally coordinated actions and campaigns can highlight the reach and scale of the resistance to foreign military presence around the world. With the trend of rising miniaturization and resort to the use of force around the world, there is now an urgent and compelling need to establish and strengthen an international network of campaigners, organisations, and movements working with a special and strategic focus on foreign military presence and ultimately, working towards a lasting and just system of peace»
No bases!
The Afghanistan and Iraq wars have, in this regard, created a favourable momentum, which has contributed to the reinforcement of the movement to close down US military bases in foreign countries:
“At the time of an International anti-war meeting held in Jakarta in May 2003, a few weeks after the start of the Iraq invasion, a global anti-military Bases campaign has been proposed as an action to priorize among global anti-war, justice and solidarity movements» (No bases).
Since then, the campaign has acquired greater recognition. E-mail lists have been compiled nousbases@lists.riseup.net and nousbases-info@lists.riseup.net that permit the diffusion of the movement members experiences and information and discussion exchanges. That list now groups 300 people and organizations from 48 countries. A Web site permits also to adequately inform all Network members. Many rubrics provide highly valuable information on ongoing activities around the World.
In addition, the Network is more and more active and participates in different activities. At the World Social Forums it organized various conferences and colloquia. It was present at the European Social Forum held in Paris in 2003 and in London in 2004 as well as at the the America’s Social Forum in Ecuador in 2004, and at the Mediterranean Social Forum in Spain in 2005.
One of the major gatherings, which was held in Mumbai, India, in 2004, was within the framework of the World Social Forum. More than 125 participants from 34 countries defined the foundations of a coordinated global campaign.
Action priorities were identified, such as the determination of a global day of action aiming at underscoring major issues stemming from the existence of US military bases. The Network also held four discussion sessions at the Porto Alegre Social Forum in 2005. One of those pertained to the financing of the Network’s activities.
It is important to recall that the Network belongs to the Global Peace Movement. Justice and Peace organizations have become more sensitized on what was at stake regarding US military bases.
The Quito and Manta International Conference, Ecuador, March 2007
A Network World Conference for the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases was held at Quito and at Manta, Ecuador, from March 5 to 9 2007
The objective of the Conference was to underscore the political, social, environmental and economic impacts of US military bases, to make known the principles of the various Anti-Bases movements and to formally build the Network, its strategies, structure and Action Plans. The main objectives of the Conference were the following:

– Analyze the role of Foreign Military Bases and other features of military presence associated to the global dominance strategy and their impacts upon population and environment;
– Share experiences and reinforce the built solidarity resulting from the resistance battles against Foreign military Bases around the World;
– Reach a consensus on objectives mechanisms, on action plans, on coordination, on communication and on decision making of a Global Network for the abolition of all Foreign military Bases and of all other expressions of military presence; and
– Establish global action plans to fight and reinforce the resistance of local people and ensure that these actions are being coordinated at the international level.

Conclusion
This article has focussed on the Worldwide development of US military power. The US tends to view the Earth surface as a vast territory to conquer, occupy and exploit. The fact that the US Military splits the World up into geographic command units vividly illustrates this underlying geopolitical reality. Humanity is being controlled and enslaved by this Network of US military bases. .
The ongoing re-deployment of US troops and military bases has to be analyzed in a thorough manner if we wish to understand the nature of US interventionism in different regions of the World. This militarisation process is charactersied by armed aggression and warfare, as well as interventions called “cooperation agreements”. The latter reaffirmed America’s economic design design in the areas of trade and investment practices. Economic development is ensured through the miniaturization or the control of governments and organizations. Vast resources are thereby expended and wasted in order to allow such control to be effective, particuarly in regions which have a strategic potential in terms of wealth and resources and which are being used to consolidate the Empire’s structures and functions.
The setting up of the International Network for the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases turns out to be an extraordinary means to oppose the miniaturization process of the Planet. Such Network is indispensable and its growth depends on a commitment of all the People of the World. It will be extremely difficult to mobilize them, but the ties built up by the Network among its constituent resistance movements are a positive element, which is ultimately conducive to more cohesive and coordinated battle at the World level.
The Final Declaration of the Second International Conference against Foreign Military Bases which was held in Havana in November 2005 and was endorsed by delegates from 22 countries identifies most of the major issues, which confront mankind. This Declaration constitutes a major peace initative. It establishes international solidarity in the process of disarmament. .
(Conférence internationale contre les bases militaires étrangères
Déclaration finale ).

Ref: Global Research, byJules Dufour

Jules Dufour is President of the United Nations Association of Canada (UNA-C) – Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean branch and Research Associate at the Center for Research on Globalization (CRG). He is Emeritus Professor of Geography at the University of Quebec, Chicoutimi.
In 2007, Professor Jules Dufour became Chevalier de l’Ordre national du Québec, a distinction conferred by the Quebec government, for his contributions to World peace and human rights, his numerous scholarly writings and the work he accomplished in the context of national and international commissions on issues pertaining to regional development, human rights and the protection of the environment.
Translated from the French, first published on Global Research’s French language website: Mondialisation.ca
References
COMITÉ DE SURVEILLANCE OTAN. 2005. Las bases militares : un aspecto de la estrategia global de la OTAN. Intervencion del Comité Surveillance Otan en la Conferencia Internacional realizada en La Habana 7-11.11.2005. 9 pages.
DELGADO JARA, Diego. 2006. Bases de Manta, Plan Colombia y dominio de la Amazonia. Militarizacion de la Hegemonia de EE. UU. En América latina. 17 pages.
EQUIPO DE COMUNICACIÓN CONFERENCIA NO BASES. 2007. La gente del mundo no quiere bases militares extranjeras.
GELMAN, J. 2007. Terratenientes. Rebelion. 26 de Febrero de 2007, Rebelion. Terratenientes
Ghana to host US Military Base? February 26, 2006.
JOHNSON, C., America’s Empire of Bases. January 2004.
JOHNSON, C. America’s Empire of Bases. Janvier 2004 .
JOHNSON, C. 2005. The Sorrows of Empire. Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic. Henry Holt, April 2005, Paperback. 389 pages.
JOHNSON, C., 2007.. 737 U.S. Military Bases = Global Empire. February 19, 2007
JUCCA, L., 2007. Italians protest over U.S. Base expansion. Sat Feb 17, 2007.
MANFREDI, E. 2007. Djibouti : Hôtel Corne d’Afrique, grande base américaine. Le GRAND SOIR.info. Édition du 23 mars 2007.
NEW INTERNATIONALIST. 2004. The Bases of Resistance, December 2004, Issue 374.
NICHOLSON, B. 2007. Secret New Us Spy base to Get Green Light. February 15, 2 007.
TRAYNOR, I. 2007. US EXPANDS, Builds New Military Bases in Europe. The Guardian, anuary 22, 2007.
TSAVDARIDIS, I., 2005. Military Bases around the world and in Europe – the role of the USA and NATO. Novembre 2005. Stop USA / STOP United States of Agression.
VAREA, C., Las bases Militares de EEUU en Iraq. 4 mai 2006. Nodo50.
Web Sites
An Internet Guide to United States Military Bases Around the World :
American Military Bases Around the World
APPEL A UN RASSEMBLEMENT INTERNATIONAL en Mars 2007, Équateur, Pour l’abolition de toutes les bases militaires
Bases y Ejercicios Militares de EE.UU. El Comando Sur.
BUILDING A GLOBAL ANTI-MILITARY BASES MOVEMENT
Campana. Un mundo sin bases militares . Asemblea de Organizaciones y Movimientos contra la guerra, la OTAN y el Neoliberalismo (Madrid), Nodo50.
Challenges to the US Empire, Challenges to the US Empire – Empire? – Global Policy Forum.
Washington veut installer une base militaire en Algérie. Le Quotidien d’Oran, 20 juillet 2003.
Empire? Empire? – Global Policy Forum
International Conference against Foreign Military Bases. Final Declaration.
[Fsmed-general] for all that are against foreign military bases:
[Fsmed-general] for all that are against foreign military bases:en/sp/fr
FUENTES DE AGUA EN AMÉRICA LATINA :
Visiones Alternativas – Inicio
Abdulhafeth Khrisat, Impérialisme américain et politique militaire, , Université Mu’tah
Interview with Chalmers Johnson, Part 1. An Empire of More Than 725 Military Bases.
Liste des bases militaires américaines dans le monde.
Major Military Bases World-Wide,
Major Military Bases World-Wide
Military Bases Around The World, Bases Around the World
Military Bases around the world and in Europe – the role of the USA and NATO , Iraklis Tsavdaridis, Secretary of the World Peace Council (WPC) 8th November 2005, From the Greek Committee for International Detente and Peace (EEDYE), Presented on November 8, 2005 at the International Conference on Foreign Military Bases in Havana/Cuba organized by MOVPAZ :
Military Bases around the world and in Europe – the role of the USA and NATO
Military of the United States : Military of the United States – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
MOVIMIENTOS SOCIALES DE RESISTENCIA EN AMÉRICA LATINA
No a la instalacion de una base de la OTAN en Zaragoza :
No a la instalación de una base de la OTAN en Zaragoza | Ecologistas en Acción de Zaragoza
OTAN – Le grand jeu des bases militaires en terre européenne :
OTAN – Le grand jeu des bases militaires en terre européenne
Protestas contra bases militares de EEUU en Espana :
Protestas contra bases militares de EEUU en Espaa
RIQUEZA DE LA BIODIVERSIDAD EN AMÉRICA LATINA
US Military Troops and Bases Around the World :
US Military Troops and Bases Around the World- US Empire and Unilateralism – Global Policy Forum
U.S. Military Troops and Bases Around the World /united for peace & justice:
United for Peace & Justice:U.S. Military Troops and Bases Around the World
US Military Expansion and Intervention :
US Military Expansion and Intervention – Empire? – Global Policy Forum
YACIMIENTOS PETROLEROS EN AMÉRICA LATINA :
Visiones Alternativas – Inicio

LinkBacks (?)

1. einartysken: Weltweit gibt’s 1000 US-Militärbasen – wer ist bedroht? Die USA

2. Refback  This thread
3. 07-02-2014, 09:19 PM

4. Standing Army Die geheime Strategie der US Militärbasen – Doku – YouTube

5. Refback  This thread
6. 04-23-2014, 06:17 AM

7. einartysken: Weltweit gibt’s 1000 US-Militärbasen – wer ist bedroht? Die USA

8. Refback  This thread
9. 02-02-2013, 11:42 AM

10. einartysken: Weltweit gibt’s 1000 US-Militärbasen – wer ist bedroht? Die USA

11. Refback  This thread
12. 07-07-2012, 03:53 PM

13. einartysken: Weltweit gibt’s 1000 US-Militärbasen – wer ist bedroht? Die USA

14. Refback  This thread
15. 06-25-2012, 09:55 AM

16. einartysken: Weltweit gibt’s 1000 US-Militärbasen – wer ist bedroht? Die USA

17. Refback  This thread
18. 06-01-2012, 01:30 PM

19. einartysken: Weltweit gibt’s 1000 US-Militärbasen – wer ist bedroht? Die USA

20. Refback  This thread
21. 10-08-2011, 01:19 PM

22. einartysken

23. Refback  This thread
24. 09-19-2011, 01:51 PM

25. 33113 Worldwide Network Us Military Bases Rapidshare Search Engine – Meta search engine – search DVD, MP3, ISO, music, video, games

26. Refback  This thread
27. 05-16-2009, 07:02 AM

28. News, Photos, Videos, Links and Blogs related to Spain and Latin AmericaSpain military installations

29. Refback  This thread
30. 10-13-2008, 01:01 AM

This article was scrubbed from the regular web. I found it here: https://web.archive.org/web/20160329033332/http://www.assatashakur.org/forum/breaking-down-understanding-our-enemies/33113-worldwide-network-us-military-bases.html

Zitate aus dem Talmud – Das “Heilige Buch” der Juden

Quelle

Das Herz der jüdischen Eigenart und das Wesen des jüdischen Volkes liegt in einem Werk verborgen, das als Talmud bekannt ist.

Der Talmud ist der Kern des Judentums.

Verständnis des Talmud ist Verständnis des Judentums…”

Was liegt also näher, als den Talmud zu Rate zu ziehen, um das Geheimnis der jüdischen Eigenart zu ergründen? Doch bereits ein flüchtiger Blick in dieses Heilige Buch der Juden läßt erahnen, warum bereits Martin Luther den Talmud ein “Buch voller Abgötterei, Fluch und Lästerung” nannte.

~~~~~~ Zitate aus dem Talmud ~~~~~~

“Die Güter der Nichtjuden gleichen der Wüste, sie sind ein herrenloses Gut und jeder, der zuerst von ihnen Besitz nimmt, erwirbt sie.” (Baba bathra 54b)

“Dem Juden ist es erlaubt zum Nichtjuden zu gehen, diesen zu täuschen und mit ihm Handel zu treiben, ihn zu hintergehen und sein Geld zu nehmen. Denn das Vermögen des Nichtjuden ist als Gemeineigentum anzusehen und es gehört dem ersten [Juden], der es sich sichern kann.” (Baba kamma 113a)

“Wenn sich ein Nichtjude mit der Thora befaßt, so verdient er den Tod.” (Synhedrin 59a)

“Die Wohnung eines Nichtjuden wird nicht als Wohnung betrachtet.” (Erubin 75a)

“Den besten der Gojim sollst du töten.” (Kiduschin 40b)

“Weshalb sind die Nichtjuden schmutzig? Weil sie am Berge Sinai nicht gestanden haben.

Als nämlich die Schlange der Chava beiwohnte, impfte sie ihr einen Schmutz ein; bei den Jisraéliten, die am Berge Sinai gestanden haben, verlor sich der Schmutz, bei den Nichtjuden aber verlor er sich nicht.” (Aboda zara 22b)

Sobald der Messias kommt, sind alle [Nichtjuden] Sklaven der Jisraéliten. (Erubin 43b)

“Wer die Scharen der Gojim sieht, spreche: Beschämt ist eure Mutter, zu Schande die euch geboren hat.” (Berakhoth 58a)

“Wer die Gräber der Gojim sieht, spreche: Beschämt ist eure Mutter, zu Schande die euch geboren hat.” (Berakhoth, 58b)

“Eher gib einem Jisraéliten umsonst als einem Nichtjuden auf Wucher.” (Baba mezia 71a)

“Ihr aber seid meine Schafe, die Schafe meiner Weide, Menschen seid ihr, ihr heißt Menschen, nicht aber heißen die weltlichen Völker Menschen, sondern Vieh.” (Baba mezia 114b)

“Der Samen der Nichtjuden ist Viehsamen.” (Jabmuth 94b)

“Der Beischlaf der Nichtjuden ist wie Beischlaf der Viecher.” (Aboda zara 22b)

“Ein Mädchen von drei Jahren und einem Tag ist zum Beischlaf geeignet.” (Jabmuth 57b, Jabmuth 60 a, Aboda zara 37a)

“Der Notzüchter braucht kein Schmerzensgeld zu zahlen, weil das Mädchen diese Schmerzen später unter ihrem Ehemann gehabt haben würde.” (Baba kamma 59a)

“Wenn jemand wünscht, daß seine Gelübde des ganzen Jahres nichtig seien, so spreche er am Beginn des Jahres: jedes Gelübde das ich tun werde, ist nichtig; nur muß er beim Geloben daran denken.” (Nedarim 23b)

~~~~~~ Ende der Zitate aus dem Talmud ~~~~~~
<h3>Gefälschte Zitate?</h3>Die meisten Menschen reagieren auf diese Talmud-Zitate mit einer Mischung aus Nicht-Glauben-Wollen und Entsetzen. Nachfolgend werden die häufigsten Entgegnungen beantwortet:

1.) Diese Zitate sind gefälscht!

Antwort: Alle zitierten Passagen finden Sie hier: Der Babylonische Talmud , erste vollständige und zensurfreie Übersetzung ins Deutsche von Lazarus Goldschmidt, zwölf Bände, Erstpublikation im Jüdischen Verlag Berlin 1930-36; Neuauflage im Jüdischen Verlag Frankfurt 2002, (ISBN 3-633-54200-0). Schlagen Sie nach, Sie werden staunen!

2.) Diese Zitate sind aus dem Zusammenhang gerissen!

Antwort: In >welchem< Zusammenhang wären die hier zitierten Aussagen mit heutigen Vorstellungen von Ethik, Moral und Anstand vereinbar? Wer bemängelt, es würden nur einige wenige Stellen aus einem ca. 10.000 Seiten umfassenden Werk zitiert, der mache sich die Mühe, das Original etwas genauer zu studieren.

Beispielsweise wird alleine im Traktat Aboda zara über 500 mal auf Nichtjuden Bezug genommen, und in keinem einzigen Fall handelt es sich um freundliche Formulierungen. Auch im übrigen Talmud findet man keine einzige Stelle, an der Juden zu ethischem Verhalten gegenüber Nichtjuden ermahnt werden. Dies ist auch nicht weiter verwunderlich, denn nach talmudischer Auslegung der Thora ( Altes Testament ) gelten die Zehn Gebote nur für Juden untereinander, nicht aber für das Verhalten von Juden gegenüber Nichtjuden.

3.) Diese Zitatensammlung ist antisemitisch!

Antwort: Ist es nicht vielmehr so, daß der Judaismus geprägt ist von Haß und Intoleranz gegenüber Nichtjuden?

Vor diesem Hintergrund ist die Reaktion auf den Judaismus per Definition antisemitisch, präziser ausgedrückt anti-judaistisch.

Dies ist die zwingende Folge des Gesetzes von Ursache und Wirkung, meint der jüdische Gelehrte Bernard Lazar in seinem Buch "Antisemitismus". Wie sonnst ist es zu erklären, daß Juden zu allen Zeiten und bei allen Völkern auf Ablehnung stießen?

4.) Ja, aber die Bibel ist um keinen Deut besser!

Antwort: Dieser Einwand ist durchaus berechtigt, sofern das Alte Testament (von den Juden Thora genannt) gemeint ist, schließlich ist der Talmud nichts weiter als die rabbinische Interpretation der Thora .

Im Alten Testament wird an vielen Stellen davon berichtet, daß die Israeliten andere Völker ausgerottet ("den Bann an ihnen vollstreckt") haben, um ihrem zornigen, strafenden Gott Jahwe ein Opfer zu bringen (siehe u.a.: 4.Mos 21,3; 5.Mos 3,6; 13,16; Jos 6,21; 8,26; 11,11-21; Ri 1,17; 21,11; 2.Sam 12,31; 1.Chr 4,41; Jes 34,2-5 Jer 25,9; 50,21; 50,26).

Hingegen ist die im Neuen Testament verkündigte Lehre der Liebe, Barmherzigkeit und Vergebung eine diametrale Abkehr vom sprichwörtlichen alttestamentarischen Haß und vom Auserwähltheitsgedanken der Hebräer.

Nichts macht den Gegensatz zwischen dem Alten Testament und dem Neuen Testament deutlicher als die Rede Jesu Christi an die Juden:

"Ihr habt den Teufel zum Vater, und nach eures Vaters Gelüste wollt ihr tun. Der ist ein Mörder von Anfang an und steht nicht in der Wahrheit; denn die Wahrheit ist nicht in ihm. Wenn er Lügen redet, so spricht er aus dem Eigenen; denn er ist ein Lügner und der Vater der Lüge." (Joh 8,44)

5.) Die über tausend Jahre alten Aussagen des Talmud spielen für Juden von heute nicht die geringste Rolle!

Antwort: Dem steht entgegen, daß Rabbiner heute noch die zentrale Bedeutung des Talmud für das Judentum bei jeder sich bietenden Gelegenheit hervorheben. Auch folgende Äußerungen aus jüngerer Zeit legen den Schluß nahe, daß die talmudische Ideologie heute nach wie vor die spirituelle Heimat der Juden ist:

"Die Seelen der Gojim [Nichtjuden] sind von ganz anderer, minderer Art. Alle Juden sind von Natur gut, alle Gojim von Natur böse. Die Juden sind die Krone der Schöpfung, die Gojim ihr Abschaum." (Rabbi Shneur Zalman, einer der einflußreichsten Talmudgelehrten unserer Zeit, FAZ, 11. 3. 1994)

"Araber sind Tiere, keine Menschen. Ihr Fleisch ist das Fleisch von Eseln, deshalb sollten sie wie Tiere behandelt werden." (Sharon Kalimi, SZ, 3. 3. 1999)

"Im Lande Israel hat kein Araber das Recht zu existieren. Ganz klar, Araber stehen auf der Kulturleiter der Welt weit unten. Goldsteins Tat [29 Nichtjuden zu ermorden] stellt die Erfüllung einiger Gebote des jüdischen Gesetzes dar. Dazu gehört auch, Rache an Nichtjuden zu üben." (Rabbi Jizchak Ginsburg, Ha'aretz vom 5. 11. 2003)

"Wenn ein Jude eine Leber benötigt, erlaubt die Thora wahrscheinlich, einem gerade vorbeikommenden Nichtjuden die Leber gewaltsam zu entnehmen. Jüdisches Leben ist unendlich viel heiliger und einmaliger als nichtjüdisches." (Rabbi Jizchak Ginsburg, zitiert in: Israel Shahak, "Jewish Fundamentalism")

"Die Palästinenser sind Tiere auf zwei Beinen!" (Menahim Begin, ehem. israelische Premierminister, New Statesman , 25. 6. 1982)

"Wir, das jüdische Volk, kontrollieren Amerika, und die Amerikaner wissen das." (Ariel Sharon, israelischer Premierminister im Radiosender Kol Yisrael)

"Wir werden die Palästinenser vernichten wie die Heuschrecken und ihre Köpfe gegen die Wand schlagen" (Friedensnobelpreisträger (!) Yitzak Rabin, ehemaliger israelischer Premierminister, New York Times , 1.4.1988)

"Die jüdische Lehre ist rassistisch, und das ist gut so." (Rechavam Zeevi, ehem. israelischer Tourismusminister, SZ, 27. 10. 2001). Derselbe im israelischen Armeeradio: ''Wir sollten die Palästinenser auf gleiche Weise entfernen wie man Läuse los wird."

"Warum sind die Juden im Geschäftsleben überall auf der Welt unglaublich erfolgreich, außer in Israel?

In Israel gibt es nicht genug Gojim, will heißen Trottel, die darauf warten, betrogen zu werden.

Wenn alle um den Ball stehen, kann keiner ein Tor schießen." (Chaim Bermant, israelischer Schriftsteller)

"Suchen wir das Geheimnis des Juden nicht in seiner Religion, sondern suchen wir das Geheimnis der Religion [des Judaismus] im wirklichen Juden. Welches ist der weltliche Grund des Judentums? Das praktische Bedürfnis, der Eigennutz. Welches ist der weltliche Kultus des Juden? Der Schacher. Welches ist sein weltlicher Gott? Das Geld […] Das Geld ist der eifrige Gott Israels, neben dem kein anderer Gott bestehen darf. Der Gott der Juden ist der Weltgott geworden." (Karl Marx, Zur Judenfrage)

Soweit einige Zitate. Auch folgende Verhaltensweisen scheinen eher vom talmudischen Geist geprägt zu sein als von allgemein akzeptierten Ideen von Toleranz und Humanismus:
<h3>Terror- und Apartheidsregime Israel:</h3>Diejenigen, die sich heute Juden nennen, (also überwiegend Abkömmlinge des zentralasiatischen Volkes der Khasaren) rechtfertigen die brutale Vertreibung der Palästinenser aus ihrer angestammten Heimat mit dem scheinheiligen Argument, ihr Gott Jahwe habe das "Heilige Land" ausschließlich ihnen geschenkt. Im Staat, der sich Israel (zu deutsch: "Gottesstreiter") nennt, sind, ganz nach Manier der Nürnberger Rassengesetze von 1935, Eheschließungen zwischen Juden und Nichtjuden verboten.

Israel schickt nahezu täglich Panzer und Bulldozer in palästinensische Flüchtlingslager, um Häuser, Straßen und landwirtschaftliche Flächen zu zerstören (vgl. Erubin 75a). Außergerichtliche Exekutionen (sprich: die Ermordung) von Palästinensern (vgl. Kidduschin 40b) sind ebenso an der Tagesordnung wie die permanente Bedrohung und Demütigung der palästinensischen Bevölkerung durch das israelische Militär (vgl. Baba mezia 114b).

UN-Sonderberichterstatter John Dugard nennt Israel ein Apartheidsregime, das schlimmer sei als das seinerzeit international boykottierte Südafrika. Wo bleibt der Aufschrei im Fall Israel?
<h3>Beschneidung:</h3>Die genitale Verstümmelung männlicher Neugeborener ist aus medizinischer Sicht völlig unnötig, nicht selten sogar schädlich. Das häufig bemühte Argument der Hygiene ist in der heutigen Zeit geradezu absurd. Dennoch lassen so gut wie alle Juden ihre Söhne am achten Tag nach der Geburt im Rahmen einer religiösen Zeremonie beschneiden.

Mit anderen Worten: Schutzlosen Neugeborenen wird ohne triftigen Grund und ohne deren Zustimmung das wohl sensitivste Stückchen Haut weggeschnitten. Viele Ärzte plädieren dafür, die Beschneidung von Jungen genauso zu ächten wie die von Mädchen. <a href="https://archive.is/o/qLuDa/https://www.mosaisk.com/video/Circumcision_Omskaering_Video.mpeg">Beschneidung Video (9 MB- rechts klicken und runter laden)</a>
<h3>Die Kosher Nostra:</h3>Jeder hat schon mal den Begriff "koscher" gehört und weiß in etwa, was damit gemeint ist. Doch kaum jemand hat von der Kosher Nostra gehört. Dies ist ein weltweit tätiges Syndikat, das Lebensmittelkonzernen für teures Geld völlig sinnlose Koscher-Zertifizierungen aufnötigt. Firmen, die nicht mitmachen, werden unterschwellig mit Boykott oder negativer Presse bedroht.

Das Ergebnis dieser skrupellosen Taktik: In den USA ist gut wie jeder in Supermärkten erhältliche Artikel "koscher" zertifiziert, ganz egal, ob es sich um Limonade, Kekse, Waschmittel oder Plastiktüten handelt.

Dies ist im wahrsten Sinne des Wortes ein Milliardenschwindel. (<a href="https://archive.is/o/qLuDa/www.aztlan.net/koshernostra.htm&quot; target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Kosher Nostra Scam</a>).

Auch in Europa zahlen Verbraucher, ohne es überhaupt zu ahnen, eine Koscher-Steuer. Beispiele bekannter Firmen, deren Produkte "koscher-zertifiziert" sind: Coca Cola, Nestlé, Kellogg´s, Del Monte, Hilcona, Thomy, Dr. Oetker, Henkel, Underberg, Milford, Milupa, Beck´s Bier, Ulzena, Degussa, BASF, Bayer AG (letztere drei für chemische Grundstoffe und Lebensmittelzusätze).

Ist das nicht ironisch, Herr Bundespräsident? Erst vor kurzem gab es einen riesigen Skandal, weil das Holocaust-Mahnmal, mit Produkten von Degussa behandelt werden sollte? Den jüdischen Gruppen, die sich darüber öffentlich und lautstark aufregten war wohl nicht bekannt, daß die Produkte der Degussa koscher zertifizeirt sind.
<h3>Schächten:</h3>Fleisch ist nur "koscher", wenn das Schlachttier auf religiös-rituelle Weise getötet wird. Hierbei werden dem unbetäubten Tier gleichzeitig Luftröhre, Speiseröhre und Halsschlagader durchtrennt. Der Todeskampf dauert meist über zehn Minuten.

Diese völlig unnötige Grausamkeit gegenüber Tieren ist in Deutschland gesetzlich untersagt. Juden haben mit der etwas weit hergeholten Behauptung, das Schächten sei durch die Religionsfreiheit geschützt, eine Ausnahmeregelung erstritten, die es ihnen gestattet, diese archaische Tierquälerei fortzuführen.<a href="https://archive.is/o/qLuDa/https://www.mosaisk.com/artikler/Joedisk-Kosher-Rituel-Slagtning-Schaechtning.php&quot; target="_blank" rel="noopener"> Schächten Video</a>
<h3>Eruv:</h3>Jede größere Stadt in der Juden leben, hat einen Eruv. Dies ist ein durch eine symbolische Schnur eingegrenztes Gebiet, in welchem es frommen Juden gestattet ist, auch am Sabbat (Samstag) leichte Arbeiten zu verrichten wie z.B. einen Schlüssel tragen, Licht einschalten oder einen Fahrstuhlknopf betätigen.

Man mag dies für einen längst überkommenen religiösen Hokus-Pokus halten, aber die in London ansässigen Juden haben erst kürzlich gegen den Widerstand der nichtjüdischen Bevölkerung einen neuen Eruv ausgewiesen.

Sowohl das Europäische Parlament in Straßburg als auch das Weiße Haus in Washington befinden sich (rein zufällig?) in einem als Eruv gekennzeichneten Gebiet.

Herr Bundespräsident, gerne würden wir erfahren, ob das Berliner Regierungsviertel sich ebenfalls, rein zufällig natürlich, innerhalb eines Eruvs befindet. Würden sie die Öffentlichkeit darüber informieren? Sie wollen doch nicht, daß der Eindruck aufkommt, in der BRD wird die Trennung von Staat und Religion nicht so genau genommen, sofern der Judaismus betroffen ist.
<h3>Auf's Kreuz spucken:</h3>Für fromme Juden ist das Bespucken von Nichtjuden und deren religiösen Symbolen eine gottgefällige Tat.

In Israel hat der Haß auf das christliche Kreuz geradezu paranoide Züge angenommen: In vielen Schulbüchern wurde dort nämlich das international gebräuchliche arithmetische Zeichen für Addition "+" durch ein auf den Kopf gestelltes "T" ersetzt (Israel Shahak, "Spitting on the Cross").
<h3>Kol Nidre:</h3>Am höchsten jüdischen Feiertag (Jom Kippur) wird das Gebet "Kol Nidre" gesungen.

Damit erklären Juden alle Gelöbnisse, die sie im kommenden Jahr ablegen werden, im voraus für null und nichtig (vgl. Nedarim 23b).

<strong><em>~~~~~~ Sonstiges ~~~~~~

Gerichtsurteil in der Schweitz – Talmud Zitate nicht gefälscht

Die Neue Luzerner Zeitung muss die Richtigstellung veröffentlichen, dass die Zitate aus dem Talmud von Tierschützer Erwin Kessler NICHT GEFÄLSCHT sind. (Hier gibt noch mehr lächerliche und mörderische Talmud Zitate!) Lesen

The Illuminati Depopulation Agenda

(Excerpted from Chapter 13: USS Persian Gulf: Big Oil & Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf…)

While the global elite construct underground bunkers, eat organic and hoard seeds in Arctic vaults; the global poor are being slowly starved thanks to high commodity prices and poisoned with genetically modified (GMO) food. Austerity measures aimed largely at the poor are being imposed on all the nations of the world. Weather events grow more deadly and brushfire wars more frequent. An AK-47 can be obtained for $49 in the markets of West Africa. The depopulation campaign of the inbredIlluminati bankers is accelerating.

In 1957 President Dwight Eisenhower, who later warned of a “military-industrial complex”, commissioned a panel of scientists to study the issue of overpopulation.  The scientists put forth Alternatives I, II and III, advocating both the release of deadly viruses and perpetual warfare as means to decrease world population.

The first supposition dovetailed nicely with the pharmaceutical interests of the Rockefellers.  According to Nexus magazine, the Rockefellers own one-half of the US pharmaceutical industry, which would reap billions developing medicines to “battle” the deadly viruses about to be released.

In 1969 the Senate Church Committee discovered that the US Defense Department (DOD) had requested a budget of tens of millions of taxpayer dollars for a program to speed development of new viruses which target and destroy the human immune system.  DOD officials testified before Congress that they planned to produce, “a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could be acquired…Most important is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.”  House Bill 5090 authorized the funds and MK-NAOMI was carried out at Fort Detrick, Maryland.

Out of this research came the AIDS virus which was targeted at “undesirable elements” of the population. The first AIDS viruses were administered through a massive smallpox vaccine campaign in central and southern Africa by the World Health Organization in 1977.  A year later ads appeared in major US newspapers soliciting “promiscuous gay male volunteers” to take part in a Hepatitis B vaccine study. [1]

The program targeted male homosexuals age 20-40 in New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, St. Louis and San Francisco. It was administered by the US Centers for Disease Control which, under its earlier incarnation as the US Public Health Department in Atlanta, oversaw the Tuskegee syphilis experiments on African American males. [2]

San Francisco has been a target of numerous CIA experiments, due to its high population of left-leaning and gay citizens, which the Illuminati views as “undesirables”.  According to Dr. Eva Snead, San Francisco has one of the highest cancer rates in the country.  For years Malathion- first developed by the Nazis- was sprayed over the city by helicopters from the CIA’s Evergreen Air, whose Arizona base is used, according to author William Cooper, as CIA transshipment point for Columbian cocaine.  The mysterious Legionnaire’s Disease occurs often in San Francisco and the CIA’s MK-ULTRA mind control bad acid program was based there.

The intellectual force behind the introduction of AIDS was the Bilderberger Group, which became fixated on population control after WWII. Author Cooper says the Policy Committee of the Bilderbergers gave orders to DOD to introduce the AIDS virus.  The Bilderbergers are close to the Club of Rome, which was founded on a Rockefeller estate near Bellagio, Italy and is backed by the same European Black Nobility who frequent Bilderberger meetings.  A 1968 study by the Club of Rome advocated lowering the birth rate and increasing the death rate.  Club founder Dr. Aurelio Peccei made a top-secret recommendation to introduce a microbe that would attack the auto-immune system, then develop a vaccine as a prophylactic for the global elite. [3]

One month after the 1968 Club of Rome meeting Paul Ehrlich published The Population Bomb. The book hints at a draconian depopulation plan in the works.  On page seventeen Ehrlich writes, “The problem could have been avoided by population control…so that a ‘death rate solution’ did not have to occur.”  A year later MK-NAOMI was born.  Peccei himself authored the Club of Rome’s much-touted Global 2000 report, which President Jimmy Carter pushed on his BCCI shakedown cruise of Africa.  Peccei wrote in the report, “Man is now vested with unprecedented, tremendous responsibilities and thrown into the role of moderator of life on the planet- including his own”.

The Bilderbergers were behind the Haig-Kissinger Depopulation Policy, a driving force at the State Department and administered by the National Security Council.  Pressure is applied to Third World countries to reduce their populations.  Those that do not comply see their US aid withheld or are subject to Pink Plan low-intensity war that targets civilians, especially women of child-bearing age.  In Africa famine and brush-fire wars are encouraged.  AK-47 rifles can be bought at West African markets for under $50.  The same is true in the markets of Peshawar, Pakistan.  In 1975, a year after attending a Club of Rome conference on the topic, Secretary of State Kissinger founded the Office of Population Affairs (OPA).

Latin American OPA case officer Thomas Ferguson spilled the beans on OPA’s agenda when he stated, “There is a single theme behind all our work; we must reduce population levels.  Either they do it our way, through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut…Once population is out of control it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…The professionals aren’t interested in reducing population for humanitarian reasons…Civil wars are somewhat drawn-out ways to reduce population.  The quickest way to reduce population is through famine like in Africa.  We go into a country and say, here is your goddamn development plan.  Throw it out the window.  Start looking at your population…if you don’t …then you’ll have an El Salvador or an Iran, or worse, a Cambodia”. [4]

Ferguson said of El Salvador, “To accomplish what the State Department deems adequate population control, the civil war (run by CIA) would have to be greatly expanded.  You have to pull all the males into fighting and kill significant numbers of fertile, child-bearing age females.  You are killing a small number of males and not enough fertile females to do the job…If the war went on 30-40 years, you might accomplish something.  Unfortunately, we don’t have too many instances of this to study”.

Report from Iron Mountain

In 1961 Kennedy Administration officials McGeorge Bundy, Robert McNamara and Dean Rusk, all CFR and Bilderberger members, led a study group which looked into “the problem of peace”.  The group met at Iron Mountain, a huge underground corporate nuclear shelter near Hudson, New York, where CFR think tank The Hudson Institute is located.  The bunker contains redundant offices in case of nuclear attack for Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell and JP Morgan Chase. [5]  A copy of the group discussions, known as Report from Iron Mountain, was leaked by a participant and published in 1967 by Dial Press.

The report’s authors saw war as necessary and desirable stating “War itself is the basic social system, within which other secondary modes of social organization conflict or conspire. (War is) the principal organizing force…the essential economic stabilizer of modern societies.”  The group worried that through “ambiguous leadership” the “ruling administrative class” might lose its ability to “rationalize a desired war”, leading to the “actual disestablishment of military institutions”.

The report goes on to say, “…the war system cannot responsibly be allowed to disappear until…we know exactly what we plan to put in its place…The possibility of war provides the sense of external necessity without which no government can long remain in power…The basic authority of a modern state over its people resides in its war powers. War has served as the last great safeguard against the elimination of necessary classes.”

Historian Howard Zinn described this conundrum when he wrote, “American capitalism needed international rivalry- and periodic war- to create an artificial community of interest between rich and poor, supplanting the genuine community of interest among the poor that showed itself in sporadic movements”.

The Iron Mountain gang was not the first to discover the virtues of war.  In 1909 the trustees of the Andrew Carnegie Foundation for International Peace met to discuss pre-WWI American life.  Many of the participants were members of Skull & Bones.  They concluded, “There are no known means more efficient than war, assuming the objective is altering the life of an entire people…How do we involve the United States in a war?”

The Report from Iron Mountain goes on to propose a proper role for those of the lower classes, crediting military institutions with providing “antisocial elements with an acceptable role in the social structure.  The younger and more dangerous of these hostile social groupings have been kept under control by the Selective Service System…A possible surrogate for the control of potential enemies of society is the reintroduction, in some form consistent with modern technology and political process, of slavery…The development of a sophisticated form of slavery may be an absolute prerequisite for social control in a world at peace.”

The Iron Mountain goons, though thrilled by the idea of slavery, listed as other socioeconomic substitutions for war: a comprehensive social welfare program, a giant open-ended space program aimed at unreachable targets, a permanent arms inspection regime, an omnipresent global police and peacekeeping force, massive global environmental pollution which would require a large labor pool to clean up, socially-oriented blood sports and a comprehensive eugenics program. [6]

The Iraqi genocide fulfilled the dreams of the Club of Rome Zero Population Growth maniacs, while also providing a testing ground for two of the war substitutes proposed by the Iron Mountain fascists: an arms inspection regime and UN peacekeepers.  Both concepts gained traction in the international community thanks to the Gulf War.

Let the Iraqi Genocide Begin

Estimates of Iraqi casualties during the Gulf War are sobering.  Some organizations like Greenpeace put the death toll at near one million people.  It was a war in which the media was denied access on a scale never before seen, so casualty figures vary greatly.  According to Tony Murphy, a researcher at the International War Crimes Tribunal, the US attack on Iraq killed 125,000 civilians, while destroying 676 schools, 38 hospitals, 8 major hydroelectric dams, 11 power plants, 119 power substations and half the country’s telephone lines.  The attacks occurred mostly at night when people were most vulnerable.

In the months following the war the death rate of Iraqi children under five tripled.  Thirty-eight percent of these deaths were caused by diarrhea. [7]  Victor Filatov, a Russian journalist reporting for Sovetskaya Rossiya from post-war Baghdad wrote, “What further bloodshed do these barbarians of the 20th century need?  I thought the Americans had changed since Vietnam…but no, they never change.  They remain true to themselves.”

According to former US Attorney General Ramsey Clark, the US was found guilty of nineteen war crimes against Iraq before the International War Crimes Tribunal.  The US dropped 88,000 tons of bombs on Iraq during the Gulf War and has rained down countless more bombs since.  Many bombs were tipped with armor piercing depleted uranium (DU) warheads, which may account for chronic Iraqi health problems.  Dr. Siegwart-Horst Gunther, a German physician who came to Iraq to help its people, became gravely ill when he handled just one cigar-sized fragment from a DU warhead.  Dr. Gunther measured the tiny object’s radioactivity to be 11 microSv per hour, whereas an acceptable exposure is no more than 300 microSv per year. [8]  Three hundred tons of DU ammunition was deployed during the war.

Many believe DU is responsible for Gulf War Syndrome, which has killed and permanently injured many US soldiers who fought in the Persian Gulf theater.  Since 2000, nearly 11,000 US Gulf War veterans have died from Gulf War Syndrome, while the Pentagon continues to cover up this travesty.

Satanism & Psychotronic Warfare

The US also tested numerous top-secret high-tech weapons systems in the Gulf theatre, while utilizing some old low-frequency favorites.  When Iraqi ground forces surrendered, many of them were in a state of delirium and lethargy that could have been induced by extremely low-frequency radio waves, which the US used as a weapon as early as the Vietnam conflict.

Yale University and CIA psychiatrist Dr. Jose Delgado studied mind control for the Company during the 1950’s as part of the MK-ULTRA program.  Delgado determined, “Physical control of many brain functions is a demonstrated fact…it is even possible to create and follow intentions…By electronic stimulation of specific cerebral structures, movements can be induced by radio command…by remote control.”

According to a military document written by Colonel Paul Valley and Major Michael Aquino titled From PSYOP to Mindwar: The Psychology of Victory, the US Army used an operational weapons system “to map the minds of neutral and enemy individuals and then to change them in accordance with US national interests”.  The technique was used to secure the surrender of 29,276 armed Viet Cong and North Vietnamese Army soldiers in 1967 and 1968.  The US Navy was also heavily involved in “psychotronic” research. [9]  Many US soldiers who served near the DMZ that divided North and South Vietnam claimed to see UFOs on a regular basis.  The Pentagon Papers revealed that an electronic barrier was placed along the DMZ by the secretive JASON Society.

Major Michael Aquino was an Army psyops specialist in Vietnam, where his unit specialized in drug-inducement, brainwashing, virus injection, brain implants, hypnosis, and use of electromagnetic fields and extremely low-frequency radio waves.  After Vietnam, Aquino moved to San Francisco and founded the Temple of Set.  Set is the ancient Egyptian name for Lucifer.  Aquino was now a senior US Military Intelligence official. [10]  He’d been given a Top Secret security clearance on June, 9, 1981.  Less than a month later an Army intelligence memo revealed that Aquino’s Temple of Set was an off-shoot of Anton La Vey’s Church of Satan, also headquartered in San Francisco. Two other Set members were Willie Browning and Dennis Mann.  Both were Army Intelligence officers.

The Temple of Set was obsessed with military matters and political fascism. It was especially preoccupied with the Nazi Order of the Trapezoid.  Aquino’s “official” job was history professor at Golden Gate College.  The Temple recruited the same Hells Angels who Billy Mellon Hitchcock had used to dole out his bad CIA acid.  Its members frequented prostitutes where they engaged in all manner of sadomasochistic activities. [11]  Director of Army Counter-Intelligence Donald Press revealed that Dennis Mann was assigned to the 306 PSYOPS Battalion and that Aquino was assigned to a top secret program known as Presidio.

Presidio was also the name of a spooky US Army base in what is now the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, which Mikhail Gorbachev reportedly frequented as the Soviet Union was falling apart.  Was Aquino part of an operation to “map the mind” of the Soviet Union’s last leader and induce him into proposing both glasnost and perestroika, the two free market policies that ultimately led to the Soviet Union’s demise?  Remember the curious mark which suddenly appeared on Gorbachev’s forehead?  Was he implanted with some sort of microchip mind-control device to make him think “in accordance with US national interests”?

Such Orwellian technology is marketed on a regular basis throughout the world.  International Healthline Corporation and others sell microchip implants in the US, Russia and Europe.  The Humane Society has adopted a policy of micro-chipping all stray pets. The State of Hawaii requires that all pets be micro-chipped.  Six thousand people in Sweden have accepted a microchip in their hand, which they use for all purchases. Trials are also underway in Japan.  In July 2002, National Public Radio reported a similar trial beginning in Seattle.  Later in 2002, after a rash of suspicious abductions of young girls, BBC reported that a British company plans to implant children with microchips so that their parents can monitor their whereabouts.

Dr. Carl Sanders, a highly acclaimed electronics engineer, revealed that a microchip project he launched to help people with severed spinal cords was taken over by the Bill Colby’s Operation Phoenix in a series of meetings organized by Henry Kissinger.  Sanders says the optimal spot for a microchip implant is just below the hairline on a person’s forehead, since the device can be recharged by changes in body temperatures, which are most pronounced there.  Interestingly, this is the location of the pineal gland or Third Eye.

The 1986 Emigration Control Act grants the President the power to mandate any kind of ID he deems necessary. [12]  Researchers at Southern California have developed a chip which mimics the hippocampus, the part of the brain that deals with memory.  Pentagon officials are interested in using it in experiments to create a “super-soldier”. [13]  Another microchip called Braingate is being implanted in paralyzed people.  It allows them to control their environment by simply thinking. [14]

In Iraq, psychological warfare gave way to slow genocide.  According to UNICEF, as of late 2001, 1.5 million Iraqi children had died as a result of sanctions, while one child in ten died before their first birthday.  Thalassemia, anemia and diarrhea were the biggest killers and could have been prevented were it not for a chronic shortage of blood and medicine in Iraq due to the sanctions.  UN Committee 661 served as arbiter of what constituted a “dual use” item and therefore banned for import into Iraq.  As of 2001, over 1,600 Iraqi contracts with Western companies for medical equipment had been blocked by 661. [15]

The Gulf War decimated Iraq’s sewer and water treatment systems. Iraqis were forced to drink polluted water, leading to numerous health problems.  Iraq was not allowed to import chlorine to clean the water since 661 deemed it a potential chemical weapon.  Electrical power was rationed in three-hour daily increments per household since the Iraqi government couldn’t get the parts it needed to fix its power plants after the US bombed its entire power grid.  With the devaluation of the Iraqi dinar and the ban on the export of 2.4 million barrels of oil per day, the average Iraqi lived on $2.50 a month- enough to buy a pair of shoes.  The only Iraqis not affected were the wealthy elite, who had long ago stashed their savings overseas in US dollars.

UNICEF estimates that 28% of Iraqi children no longer went to school.  Before the war almost all children attended.  Often families could only afford to send one child to school because of the cost of simple things like backpacks, shoes and notebooks.  Rafah Salam Aziz, Director of Mansour Children’s Hospital, said parents were often forced to make similar decisions about their children’s lives.  Aziz said, “Many times it’s easier for a family to let a baby die rather than let the whole family go hungry and get sick.”[16]

In 1996 Clinton Defense Secretary William Perry announced a new military buildup in the Persian Gulf.  Soon cruise missiles were again raining down on Baghdad.  Many nations now grew weary of both US bombing and the sanctions regime, which was brutalizing the Iraqi people while strengthening the grip of Saddam Hussein.  Russian President Boris Yeltsin, whose country signed a deal with Iraq to rebuild its shattered oil sector, said he was disturbed at the use of “extreme and radical force against the Arab world”.  The Russian opposition offered a more scalding appraisal.  Alexander Lebed stating angrily, “The US is like a strong master who spits on everybody.”[17]

Turkey, Jordan and Syria all expressed unease over the new round of bombing.  Even the Saudis, where Islamic fundamentalism was on the rise and two major bombings had occurred at US bases, now refused to allow the US to use its bases to bomb Iraq.  Many countries, including France, began openly flaunting the UN embargo against Iraq in the late 1990’s.

Dennis Halliday, former Assistant Secretary of the UN who initially headed the UN Humanitarian Program to Iraq, resigned his post in protest. He said sanctions were demolishing the very class of Iraqi people who wanted to create a better government in the country.  He was scornful of the UN Oil for Food Program under which the US received 70% of Iraqi oil.  Halliday stated plainly, “We are guilty of committing genocide, through the Security Council, against Iraq.”[18]

Halliday’s 1998 successor was Hans Van Sponeck, who watched as the UN unfurled the UNSCOM arms inspection regime, paid for by Iraqi oil sales.  US inspector Scott Ritter confirmed Iraqi suspicions that UNSCOM was gathering intelligence for CIA and Mossad.  UNSCOM was just the latest CIA tool.  In 1996 the Iraqi government claimed international relief agencies, including the World Food Program, which claimed to be helping the Kurds, were actually CIA operatives attempting to destabilize the country.

In fact the CIA had spent more than $20 million in its support of the Iraqi National Congress, led by long-time CIA surrogate Jalal Talibani’s PKK Kurdish faction. [19]  In January 1997 Iraq uncovered two Mossad spy rings in one month following the attempted assassination of Saddam Hussein’s son. [20]  Hans Van Sponeck had seen enough. He too resigned in protest.

In early 1999 it was revealed that the US had used UNSCOM to plant electronic bugging devices in the Iraqi Ministry of Defense.  Arms inspector Scott Ritter said the CIA was using UNSCOM to “provoke a crisis”.  In December 1998 UNSCOM, faced with the embarrassing accusations of espionage, pulled out of Iraq.  On December 15th the US launched a new round of bombing.  Ritter says intelligence gathered by UNSCOM was used for targeting. UNSCOM spokesman David Kay resurfaced in 2003 calling for a US invasion of Iraq. He now worked for SAIC, which landed numerous Pentagon contracts to rebuild Iraq.

[1] Behold a Pale Horse. William Cooper. Light Technology Press. Sedona, AZ. 1991. p.166

[2] Robot’s Rebellion: The Story of the Spiritual Renaissance. David Icke. Gateway Books. Bath, UK. 1994. p.305

[3] Cooper. p.166

[4] Ibid

[5] Rule by Secrecy: The Hidden History that Connects the Trilateral Commission, the Freemasons and the Great Pyramids. Jim Marrs. HarperCollins Publishers. New York. 2000. p.114

[6] Ibid. 116

[7] “Child Death Rate Jumps in Iraq”. AP. Great Falls Tribune. 9-24-92. p.8

[8] “Depleted Uranium”. Siegwart-Horst Gunther. Covert Action Quarterly. Winter 2001. p.2

[9] Cooper. p.369

[10] Icke. p.221

[11] Cooper. p.361

[12] Icke. p.223

[13] Inquirer. UK. 10-25-05

[14] PhysOrg News. 11-1-95 http://www.physorg.com/news7746.html

[15] “Greetings from Missile Street”. Free Speech TV. Boulder, CO. 12-23-01

[16] “US Economic Sanctions Taking Very Human Toll in Iraq”. Great Falls Tribune. 9-13-92.

[17] “Slamming Saddam”. Time. 9-16-96. p.31

[18] “The Unfinished War”. CNN. 1-6-02

[19] Evening Edition. National Public Radio. 9-10-96

[20] BBC World News. 1-8-97

Source

Julian Assange’s Ties to Nazi Jew illuminati Cult

December 27, 2010

by Richard Evans
(for henrymakow.com) 

Julian Assange was born in 1971. His birth parents ran a touring theatre company but his father abandoned them.

When Julian was 8-years-old, his mother, Christine, married a member of “The White Brotherhood” – aka “The Family” or San­ti­nike­tan Park Asso­ci­a­tion, a private psychiatric hospital on the outskirts of Melbourne Australia.

In the 1960’s-1980’s, the Santiniketan Park Association received CIA-Sandoz LSD-25.

The psychiatric hospital was part of a New Age colony with about 200 members. They were all professionals:  psychiatrists, medical doctors – 25% were nurses – lawyers, and ranking civil servants and social workers.

The allegations were that these people used their authority to “collect” (kidnap) children. As many as twenty eight children had been ‘collected’ under the custody of the director, Anne Hamilton-Byrne, a theosophist.  Children were selected for their Aryan traits.

This cult is well documented from the Australian investigations and court proceedings highlighted in the Oz media at the time.

According to Assange, his parents broke with the cult in 1982 and until 1990, they lived ‘on the run’  moving dozens of times. During this period, Julian was charged with computer hacking by the Australian police.  That’s all Assange has said about it, claiming that he doesn’t remember Hamilton-Byrne or anything about the cult.

Cult members have disclosed the children were collected for a “scientific experiment”. Though  Hamilton-Byrne (left, insert) remained silent, members disclosed that Hamilton-Byrne predicted a global holocaust which wipe out most of humanity.  She was preparing the cult children to be “inheritors of the earth”.

Anne Hamilton-Byrne is definitely MTF(male to female) transgender fake woman, and is really a man, ‘dragqueen’.

CIA has often managed and grown it’s agents from births, nurtured into transgenders by Eugenics Programs. So, Anne and her/his husband are all CIA cult programmer transgenders! Unfortunately, Assange has big possibility of his real ‘Identity’ of gender, too!

I ‘ve researched ‘Transgender Agenda’, and I think that Assange will be revealed to be a FTM(female to male) transgender transman born originally female. And the most important thing is that his mother, Christine is definitely a MTF transgender and transgenderings are generational!

It was already unveiled that Edward Snowden is a special FTM transgender agent for power-game of CIA and NSA.

Assange has female skull- structure, faminine face, jawline and small mouth, small hands….. and so on.These are all woman’s traits. If he is turned out to be a transgender with more researches, he/she must be a member of the dirty scum, CIA, and so forth.

According to Hamilton-Byrne’s real daughter Sarah Moore the children hadn’t been told about that.  What they were told was that Anne Hamilton-Byrne was their birth mother, even though their number and ages made that impossible.  The were told all other members of the cult were their ‘uncles or aunties’ – even though some of these were the real birth parents of a few of them.

The “Family” was related to the Nazi “Lebensborn e. V.” organization   founded in December, 1935 as a “registered association” ostensibly to foster population increase in ‘declining’ ‘pure Aryan’ stock in Europe.

German FTR movie LEBENSBORN, Nazi Lebensborn Film Brochure, Nazi Jew propaganda film, Lebensborn eV, SS doctor, Maria Perschy, Renate Kumlister, Birgitt Bergen, Elke Eichwede

Lebensborn e. V was under the authority of the SS “race and settlement bureau”.  Lebensborn is best remembered as a breeding program for SS ‘studs’ with select Aryan female volunteers.  The project included social workers of the settlement bureau screening schools and hospitals in Germany and occupied Europe looking for infants and children that fit the Nazi eugenics profile of traits.

Thousands of such children were ‘drafted’ into the program – kidnapped – and sent to  to remote hospital/academy locations for mind control programming.  There were over 30 of these facilities throughout Europe, which processed as many as 30,000 new births.

However, many more older children taken from other countries were sent to special facilities for “Aryanisation” re-programming.  The best source of information is the record of the 8th Nuremberg Trial, United States of America v. Ulrich Greifelt, et al., or the RuSHA Trial.

Daniel Assange the secret Son of Julian Assange

The infamous Dr. Josef Mengele is generally remembered for lethal ‘experiments’ on children at Auschwitz . It’s often overlooked that the purpose of his butchery was the scientific improvement of pre-existing methods of Illuminati trauma based mind programming of children, and his techniques were instituted in Lebensborn “Aryanisation’” facilities.

Mengele was an architect of MK-ULTRA.   Mengele was protected by Office of Strategic Services (OSS) ‘Operation Paperclip’ and went to work for the CIA’s top secret MK-ULTRA projects. .

Hamiliton-Byrne’s White Brotherhood operation apparently was a continuation of Lebensborn.   Hamilton-Byrne’s obsession with white-blonde uniformity to the point of blearching the children’s hair and identical styles and dress is a bit too close to Lebensborn to dismiss.

ASSANGE’S ACCUSER

Anna Ardin’s, who accused Assange of ‘rape’ went AWOL from the Swedish feminist prosecutor December 9th to surface on the West Bank in the Palestinian Territories, as a member of “The Brotherhood,” allegedly a “Christian outreach group” that protests Israeli “settlers”in Palestinian territory.
http://www.the-peoples-forum.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=21830   Feminist twitter tweets have been ablaze accusing Ardin of being a CIA Christian Nazi.

(Ardin, left, ten years ago and today)

Ardin’s action was such a wild disconnect that one has to wonder if maybe her real handlers aren’t the left-wing arm of the Swedish (national) Socialist Party.

Isn’t it tempting to connect those dots.  The dots between Wikileaks residing on Pirate Bay‘s P2P servers in Stockholm, which are owned by Carl Lund­strom, the self professed  Swedish neo-Nazi and financial backer of Sweden’s fas­cist polit­i­cal party, the Socialistiska partiet.

Before WWII that party used to be Sweden’s Communist Party, the Sveriges kommunistiska, but they converted to National Socialism during the war and remained that way ever since.

The Swedish Socialist Party is not to be confused with the leftist Social Democratic Party which employed Anna Ardin as press secretary.  It certainly begins to appear that Ardin is a double agent.    Her actions are worthy of the Goddess Eris who  tossed the ‘Apple of Discord’ in the proximity of three goddesses, seeing it is inscribed “Kallisti – for the most beautiful one” .  The Cat Fight of the Goddesses
http://www.democracynow.org/seo/2010/12/20/naomi_wolf_vs_jaclyn_friedman_a

Here’s where things get weird.  Pirate Bay Lundstrom’s family was linked with Sandoz pharmaceuticals. Sandoz had been a division of Nazi corp I.G. Farben during WWII, patented the only pharmaceutical LSD in the world.

These revelations provide more evidence of Assange’s ties with the Illuminati, as if any were needed. Hamilton-Byrne’s family was probably one of many cells in a post-war Nazi “Lebensborn” program assisted by the CIA and MK-ULTRA.

Links
============================== on Mt. Olympus ensued. Hence last week’s  Pacifica Media “Democracy NOW” broadcast with “End of America” enthusiast Naomi Wolf in a shouting match cat fight with rabid radical Feminista “My Sluthood Myself” author Jacklyn Friedman.

===========================

Excerpt from book by Hamilton-Bryne Daughter

Anne Hamilton-Byrne “The Family” cult. 
http://www.rickross.com/groups/thefamily.html

Anne Hamilton-Byrne, Leader of The Family unrepentant but ready to die. 
http://www.news.com.au/national/anne-hamilton-byrne-leader-of-the-family-unrepentant-but-ready-to-die/story-e6frfkvr-1225762020614

Der Lebensborn – Pramen života ( Czech film festival, 2000)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtrUYbyVQFw&feature=related

Great White Brotherhood, Blavatsky, Aryans, VRIL & SS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kv6Lg5qj8F4&feature=related

Swedish Nazi Patron 

c. 2010 http://www.henrymakow.com

– See more at:

http://www.henrymakow.com/stranger_than_fiction_life_of.html#sthash.p52HxYZE.dpuf

Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison I

Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison II: Deconstruction Of The Myth

George Hunt – The New World Bank, Religion, and Rulers 1987

George Hunt became aware of the environmental fraud after attending the Wilderness Conference in Colorado in 1987.

From then until his death Dec 23rd 2013 George dedicated himself to exposing the environmental fraud, masterminded by Maurice Strong and his boss, Baron Edmund de Rothschild.

Video The Oven

Video TheirTube

Website The Bernician

If you are interested in knowing who, how and why the plans for ‘sustainable development’ were founded and by whom, look no further than George’s courageous expose.

The Big Bad Bank
The expose documentary by George Washington Hunt of a secret bank created over the past 25 years.

The Big Bad Bank – Intro
The Big Bad Bank Intro George Washington Hunt introduces us to the World Conservation Bank. Mr. Hunt also explains his background and how he discovered the plan for this bank. One of the handouts included the Brundtland Report “Our Common Future” as well George reveals what the bank will need to get it’s feet off the ground.

The Big Bad Bank – Responsibility to Educate
The Big Bad Bank by George Washington Hunt, in this part he goes further into his background on how he assumed the vast education responsibility to educate us about the World Conservation Bank. We listen to the voice of David Lang, and elitist who tells us how the common people shouldn’t be told about this bank. Then we look at the wilderness inventory and what the US stands to lose as part of conservation projects that the bank will control. George Hunt goes into further explanation of how the Rich Evil Elitists are like and what they will own and how they can handle things.

The Big Bad Bank – Your Educator
The Big Bad Bank – George Washington Hunt is your educator, it’s his goal to educate millions of people about this bank. George also points out that the banks requiring bailouts should not have been saved and cost the tax payers dearly. The Big Bad Bank or The World Conservation Bank was formed at the 4th World Wilderness Congress in Estes Park in September 1987, the bank could be capitalized by the shares of stock and trusts of the members. The big problems are that the currency unit will rise to high, prices will skyrocket, and the worst part is that the bank will purposely go bust and all of the assets will be left in the hands of the shareholders in this bank. Also in this part of the video we hear from Baron Edmond James de Rothschild about technologies that the bank will use to ultimately come to its demise.

The Big Bad Bank – Conservation
The Big Bad Bank – George Washington Hunt tells us how he was selected as an official host at the 4th World Wilderness Congress. Thinking it was an environmental event he attended but his attention was shifted to bank matters, some of the people George met were the international bankers including David Rockefeller, Baron Edmond James de Rothschild, the Prime Minister of Norway Gro Harlem Brundtland and Maurice Strong.

The Big Bad Bank – Greed and Power
The Big Bad Bank – This section focus on Greed and Power of the largest international bankers, the most famous was J.P. Morgan. George Washington Hunt’s Great Grandfather, Also GW Hunt, was building a railroad, at the same time Edward Henry Harriman was also building a railroad in the same direction and Harriman was able to go to JP Morgan for funds to continue his railroad and beat GW Hunt to the pass because he had the money to do so. More on the rich and powerful we get a little history on the Rothschild family as well as the Rockefeller family. “The custodian of the Planet” Maurice Strong is also a big player in the politics of this bank. Strong was working to take water from the San Luis Valley in Colorado and sell it at high profit margins to other cities in the US.

The Big Bad Bank – Reviewing the Scenario
The Big Bad Bank – Reviewing the Scenario, George Washington Hunt reminds us of what is involved with this bank and how they plan on making a whole lot of money by doing things such as those of Maurice Strong and how he was planning on destroying the wilderness in the San Luis Valley of Colorado but at the same time was also working as an environmentalists with the big investors in this Big Bad Bank. We also hear the voice of Maurice Strong speaking about this conservation bank and introducing Baron Edmond de Rothschild.

The Big Bad Bank – The Rich Elite
The Big Bad Bank – Here we see an article about David Rockefeller and William Ruckleshaus speaking about this bank, we also learn more about the Rothschild family, Nathan Rothschild had inside knowledge of the outcome of Battle of Waterloo in the war of 1816 and was able to quickly turn the events out in his favor and wound up owning the Bank of England overnight. One possible solution to turning this Big Bad Bank over to good has would be if the G-77 Countries of the world took charge and hired the best talent, rather than a private bank which could turn on the people.

The Big Bad Bank – Closing Statements
The Big Bad Bank – Bailouts, One big Bad Bank and more problems that America has, including the debt to the Federal Reserve. John F Kennedy tried to solve America’s problem with the Federal Reserve by having more money printed, but that’s a whole other theory. Wrapping up the show and quickly touching on what George Washington Hunt has presented to us in this video as well as a few last points about current events and theories about expensive and harmful environment projects.

Source

Governments and Biowarfare: A Brief History by James Corbett

James Corbett
The Corbett Report

1 May, 2009

As questions continue to mount about the origins of the mysterious Mexican flu which is pushing the world into mass hysteria, some are noting that its genetic fingerprint suggests it was created in a laboratory while those who are tracking the small number of confirmed deaths from the outbreak—all of the victims so far being Mexican nationals—are questioning if this is a race-specific bioweapon. While some in the controlled corporate media dismiss such inquiry out of hand, serious researchers know that there is a long and well-documented history of governments experimenting with, deploying and even creating bioweapons to use as a means of warfare, population control and consolidation of governmental power.

Biowarfare itself goes back to the earliest periods of recorded human history. The ancient Hittites over 3000 years ago drove plague victims into enemy lands with the intent of infecting the enemy population. Athenians poisoned the water supply of their enemies in Kirrha with a toxic plant called hellebore sometime around 590 BC. Scythians in 4th century BC learned to smear their arrow tips with snake venom, blood and even animal feces in order to infect their enemy’s wounds. In the 18th century, the British commander Lord Amherst famously wrote about a plan to infect Native Americans by giving them smallpox-infected blankets, and researcher Kevin Annett has documented similar actions by the Canadian government, which acted in coordination with the Catholic, Anglican and United churches in Canada’s residential school system to facilitate the genocide of Canadian natives.

Of course, as science began to make progress in understanding and manipulating naturally occurring biological agents, so too did biowarfare become more deadly. The modern age of biowarfare began in earnest in WWI, with the Germans beginning to use anthrax as a stealth weapon against key targets in enemy countries. Accords such as the Geneva Protocol of 1925 attempted to prohibit the use of biowarfare, but that didn’t stop any of the major powers, including the Germans, the Japanese, the Americans, the Canadians or the British from pursuing biowarfare capabilities. The excuse was always that these biowarfare programs were merely for defensive purposes, but of course there is no material difference between a defensive and an offensive biowarfare program.

The American government’s approach to biowarfare is notable for its unabashed use of unwitting American citizens as guinea pigs in biological weapons research. The very people who helped establish the U.S. biological weapons programs openly bragged about their experiments on unwitting human test subjects. Dr. Cornelius Rhoads, who founded the U.S. Army Biological Warfare facilities in Maryland, Utah and Panama purposefully infected test subjects with cancer cells while in the employ of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Investigations. He later wrote letters about the tests. With that as a starting point for the American bioweapons research program, what follows is a list of experimental horrors too long to reproduce, but which includes:

  – 1932: The Tuskegee Syphilis Study begins. 200 black men diagnosed with syphilis are never told of their illness, are denied treatment, and instead are used as human guinea pigs in order to follow the progression and symptoms of the disease. They all subsequently die from syphilis, their families never told that they could have been treated. Follow this link for more info.

  – 1950: In an experiment to determine how susceptible an American city would be to biological attack, the U.S. Navy sprays a cloud of bacteria from ships over San Franciso. Monitoring devices are situated throughout the city in order to test the extent of infection. Many residents become ill with pneumonia-like symptoms. Follow this link for more info.

  – 1955: The CIA, in an experiment to test its ability to infect human populations with biological agents, releases a bacteria withdrawn from the Army’s biological warfare arsenal over Tampa Bay, Fl. Follow this link for more info.

  – 1956: U.S. military releases mosquitoes infected with Yellow Fever over Savannah, Ga and Avon Park, Fl. Following each test, Army agents posing as public health officials test victims for effects. Follow this link for more info.

  – 1965: Prisoners at the Holmesburg State Prison in Philadelphia are subjected to dioxin, the highly toxic chemical component of Agent Orange used in Viet Nam. The men are later studied for development of cancer, which indicates that Agent Orange had been a suspected carcinogen all along. Follow this link for more info.

  – 1966: U.S. Army dispenses Bacillus subtilis variant niger throughout the New York City subway system. More than a million civilians are exposed when army scientists drop lightbulbs filled with the bacteria onto ventilation grates. Follow this link for more info.

  – 1990: More than 1500 six-month old black and Hispanic babies in Los Angeles are given an “experimental” measles vaccine that had never been licensed for use in the United States. CDC later admits that parents were never informed that the vaccine being injected to their children was experimental. Follow this link for more info.

  – 1994: With a technique called “gene tracking,” Dr. Garth Nicolson at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, TX discovers that many returning Desert Storm veterans are infected with an altered strain of Mycoplasma incognitus, a microbe commonly used in the production of biological weapons. Incorporated into its molecular structure is 40 percent of the HIV protein coat, indicating that it had been man-made. Follow this link for more info.

As horrifying as these admitted tests of biological weapons on unwitting subjects are, perhaps even more frightening is the knowledge that governments have a documented history of using biological agents against their own citizens in bioterror false flag operations. It is no coincidence that two of the most well-known and devastating biological releases this decade have traced back to Fort Detrick (the home of the U.S. biological weapons research program since the 1950s and the current home of USAMRIID) and Porton Down (Fort Detrick’s British equivalent). 

In the late Winter of 2001, an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease ravaged the British farming industry, requiring the government-mandated destruction of millions of animals. The losses to British farmers were nearly incalculable with a number of cases of farmers ending their own lives in anguish over their loss of livelihood. In April of 2001, the Sunday Express reported that the outbreak came just months after an audit of Porton Down—a top secret government bioweapons research facility housing such agents as TB, anthrax and smallpox—found that phials containing foot-and-mouth samples were missing from the lab. Authorities tried to play down the report by suggesting that “animal rights activists” had stolen and released the samples from the maximum security government laboratory. Authorities failed to explain why animal rights activists would be interested in releasing a biological agent that would result in the destruction of millions of animals, or how they were able to penetrate the multiple layers of defenses in the heavily defended laboratory.

Just months later, anthrax-laced letters began to show up in the offices of the Bush Administration’s most vocal media opponents and political rivals in the U.S. The administration and their puppets in the corporate-controlled media immediately began to theorize that the anthrax used in the letters was a crude concotion that an Al-Qaeda operative could have mixed in a bathtub. It later emerged that these anthrax spores were in fact the most sophisticated weaponized form of the deadly plague ever seen and the particular strain used in its production was traced back to Fort Detrick. It later emerged that key members of the Bush Administration had been on Cipro, the anti-anthrax drug, since the morning of 9/11. The entire story of the anthrax investigation is lengthy and convoluted, but extremely important for a better understanding of false flag bioterrorism.

Of course, these are only the well-known examples from the past decade, but naturally there are others (including the 2007 foot-and-mouth outbreak in England, which was also found to come from a government lab). Even worse than these examples is the knowledge that the types of bioweapons that governments around the world have been developing far outstrip anthrax or foot-and-mouth in sophistication and effectiveness. Although the full extent of American bioweapons research remains classified, it is public knowledge that the American military was already experimenting with race-specific bioweapons at least since 1970, a technology that the Apartheid South African government was known to possess and which Israel was developing last decade. It does not take much imagination to envision why those two governments would have been interested in the technology, but it may be surprising to learn that the American government has not only been developing race-specific bioweapons, but that key government officials have advocated their use as a way of furthering American foreign policy. In September 2000 a neocon think-tank called Project for a New American Century released a policy paper, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses”, that contained the following chilling quotation: “advanced forms of biological warfare that can “target” specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.” Prominent PNAC members included Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Jeb Bush and Scooter Libby.

Given all of the foregoing, the suggestion that the current flu pandemic may in fact be a government-engineered race-specific bioweapon is not only plausible, but the first possibility that any rational investigator would consider when examining the never before seen flu strain which only seems to be killing Mexicans. The natural question at this point is not whether the government could do such a thing, but why they would do such a thing.

Naturally, governments deploy biological agents for a number of different reasons. The 2001 foot-and-mouth outbreak ushered in a new era of internationally-standardized farming procedures and guidelines in the name of ‘food safety’ and the protection of trade interests, ultimately leading to such Orwellian programs as the National Animal Identification System (which is now being administered in other countries under different names). The 2001 anthrax attack not only helped to silence Bush media critics and Democrats who showed any sign of resisting the Bush Administration’s “War on Terror” policies, but it also ensured the passage of the Patriot Act, which was rushed through Congress as the height of the anthrax scare before anyone even had a chance to read it.

So if this new flu is indeed a bioweapon, and if it has been released on purpose, the question remains: What motive would a western government have for this release, especially considering the new flu now threatens the entire globe? The answers to that question are numerous, but can be located in such things as the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, as well as the precedent-setting consolidation of power in the hands of agencies like the WHO during this crisis. The Corbett Report will be covering these possible motives behind the attack in a series of forthcoming articles, but for now readers are advised to further familiarize themselves with the concept of false flag bioterror by listening to Episode 060 of The Corbett Report.

Episode 060 – A bioterror false flag

Right click and “save as” to download the mp3 or listen directly.

Source

Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison I

October 28, 2010

Video

by Jonathan Azaziah

Source

Disinformation is defined as ‘misinformation that is deliberately disseminated in order to influence or confuse rivals.’ It is used by governments to mislead and brainwash their citizen populations, instigate wars, and blackmail foreign regimes. It is the ultimate instrument of the media. The most effective disinformation is that which is comprised of falsehood as well as facts. Wikileaks, founded by Julian Assange, fits this description perfectly, right down to the letter. Seemingly overnight, it has become one of the biggest ‘whistle-blowing’ agencies in modern history. In reality though, it is one of the biggest disinformation projects in modern history, and it may be the most dangerous because it is masquerading as an organization of truth. The information released by Wikileaks isn’t new; it isn’t groundbreaking; it doesn’t hurt the US as much as people think, it’s fractional really; and it is overloaded with as much as propaganda as the day-to-day Zionist media is. This propaganda is benefitting someone. And that someone is the illegal usurping entity of Israel. Even the Israeli government itself thinks so (1). 

Afghanistan Drivel

The first major ‘leak’ released earlier this year by Assange was about occupied Afghanistan in the form of more than 92,000 documents. These docs included ‘secret files’ about civilian killings by the US and NATO along with boogeyman stories about the long-dead Osama Bin Laden, garbage regarding the Taliban acquiring ground-to-air missiles, and plenty of lies about Pakistan’s intelligence agency, the ISI (2). There wasn’t a single document about the Israeli training of the Taliban (3), the massive drug profiteering by the Mossad (4), the CIA (5) and the US-puppet Hamid Karzai and his brother (6), Karzai’s connections to Unocal and Zionist war criminal Henry Kissinger (7), the clandestine Israeli business operations set up to take control of the oil fields in neighboring Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan (8), or the Russian-Jewish mafia, fully protected by the Zionist entity, selling guns to US-backed Afghan warlords (9). Why weren’t any of these massively important, critically damning events and operations mentioned? Because by doing so, it would incriminate the already internationally condemned Zionist regime. Journalists, bloggers and activists, from occupied Afghanistan and abroad, have been reporting on the vast civilian casualties in Afghanistan since US intervention began more than 30 years ago. Wikileaks revealed nothing that wasn’t already known; however, it did reinforce Zionist propaganda regarding the illegal ‘war on terror.’

Iraq Malarkey

The next major ‘leak’ by Assange’s organization, which has gained more notoriety than the previous ‘leak,’ was about occupied Iraq in the form of nearly 400,000 documents. Like the occupied Afghanistan disinformation, it included ‘secret files’ about mass civilian killings by US forces, torture by war criminal Nouri al-Maliki and his forces (which according to Wikileaks, US military officials attempted to halt) (10), US government failings in reprimanding Blackwater (XE) for committing murder (11), and brutal executions by the American and British occupiers mixed with more tripe about fictitious Al-Qaeda, nonsense about Iran training militant Iraqi militias and Iranian drones flying over Iraq (12), Iran smuggling guns, munitions, and explosives into Iraq (13), ridiculous accusations of the Lebanese Resistance movement Hezbollah training Iraqis in the art of kidnaping (14), slanderous attacks on Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, and other absurd assertions about the Islamic Republic involved in the murder of innocent Iraqis. The Wikileaks Iraq war logs also ‘reveal’ civilian casualties numbered at 66,081 (15). The logs also ‘reveal’ that Iraqi WMDs actually did exist, as US soldiers found chemical weapons labs, terrorist toxin specialists, and chemical weapons caches (16). 

There was nothing ‘secret’ about American and British forces murdering, torturing and raping innocents in occupied Iraq. Like Afghanistan, Iraqi and international journalists, bloggers, and activists have been reporting the murder of civilians in Iraq since the beginning of the illegal occupation, with much more effectiveness than Wikileaks. The US military didn’t attempt to halt the puppet al-Maliki’s torture of unlawfully imprisoned Iraqis, they partook in it. They led the way after they signed off on it. They were the primary perpetrators (17). Secret prisons are still operating at this very moment where US forces barbarously torture innocent Iraqis (18). The US hired Blackwater’s contractors to instill fear and execute terrorism against the people of Iraq, of course it didn’t reprimand them. Erik Prince’s private army of terror was only doing what it was told to by the US government.

The concept of Hezbollah training foreign militias to meddle in state affairs is absolute lunacy; Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah himself has stated on numerous occasions that if Hezbollah wanted to overthrow the Lebanese government, they would’ve done so already (19). Their objectives (as evidenced by their actions), are to protect the Lebanese people, provide them with security and uphold their dignity. Hezbollah hasn’t undermined its own government, it is asinine to think it would undermine the government of another nation. The propaganda targeting Iran is pathetic; there are enough guns in Iraq thanks to American support of Saddam Hussein to last lifetimes (20), there was no need for Iran to provide weapons to Iraqi militias through ‘smuggling.’ The only drones that were flying in Iraq’s skies belonged to the repulsive Zionist entity, not Iran (21). The other accusations sound like concoctions dug up from the dungeons of Zionist think tanks and lobby organizations salivating for the destruction of the Islamic Republic, not the work of whistle-blowers attempting to expose corruption and disseminate truth. These accusations further the Zionist case for striking Iran militarily. These accusations are promoting more war, not peace.

Wikileaks must not have gotten the memo about civilian casualties in occupied Iraq. They are nowhere near 66,081. They have eclipsed the 1.5 million mark. Anything less than this, especially a number as low as the one presented by Wikileaks, is classic misreporting aimed at protecting the United States government and its collaborators. That is an insult to the 5 million Iraqi orphans and the 5 million Iraqi refugees. It is a slap in the face to the dead Iraqis whose names will never be known because they were incinerated by US and Israeli weaponry. And the notion that US soldiers found WMDs in Iraq, after the ‘Iraq has WMDs’ myth has been debunked as Zionist-designed propaganda over and over again, is frankly, infuriating. The only WMDs that exist in Iraq are the mark-77, white phosphorus, and thousands of tons of depleted uranium used in Basra, Baghdad, and Fallujah by the terrorist army of the US and strategically placed Mossad agents of Israel (22).

Targeted On Behalf Of Israel

Where are the leaks on the 55 Zionist companies profiting from Iraqi blood being spilled (23)? Where are the leaks on Iraq’s artifacts being stolen by Zionist agents (24)? Where are the leaks on hundreds of Mossad agents operating in Mosul (25)? Where are the leaks on the Mossad bomb-making facility in Kirkuk (26)? Where are the leaks on the Mossad murderers stationed in several villages around the devastated area of Fallujah (27)? Where are the leaks on the depleted-uranium-tipped IEDs of Zionist-owned Zapata Engineering that have massacred thousands in Najaf, Karbala and Tal Afar, just to name a few (28)? Where are the leaks on the Israeli arms dealers supplying weapons to CIA-trained death squads (29)? Where are the leaks on Zionist war criminal Paul Wolfowitz importing Shin Bet torture experts to train the US military (30)? Where are the leaks on Mossad conducting interrogations and torture in Iraq jails, including Abu Ghraib (31)? Where are the leaks that will actually tie the illegal war, which was exclusively designed by Zionists, to Israel? They don’t exist because Wikileaks isn’t concerned with uncovering the truth regarding the real criminals; they’re concerned with leading the public away from the truth to keep them under control. It’s COINTELPRO all over again.

The target of Wikileaks’ first release was the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The objectives of the operation were to give credibility to war criminal Obama’s illegal drone strikes that have murdered over 1,000 civilians (32), raise the possibility of a future overt occupation, and cover up the meddling of Israel in occupied Afghanistan. It is vital to note that the de-stablization of Pakistan has been a Zionist objective since the declaration of al-Nakbah architect, David Ben-Gurion (33). The target of Wikileaks’ second release was the Islamic Republic of Iran. The objective of this operation was to slander two of the very few entities on earth resisting Israel, Hezbollah and Iran; as well as cover up the Zionist fingerprints all over the mutilation of Iraq. The IAEA has already inadvertently foiled the Zionist plan to attack Iran based on the nuclear premise, confirming that the Iranian nuclear program is peaceful in nature and has nothing to do with weaponization (34). The Zionist hasbara experts needed to try something new; through Wikileaks, the accusations of the Zionist Bush administration against Iran have resurfaced under the guise of ‘whistle-blowing.’ What a sham.

Conclusion

A final note needs to be made about Julian Assange, the man who has been praised as a freedom fighter, a revolutionary and a friend of the oppressed people. In a recent interview, he stated, “I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud (35).” It’s shameful that Assange is annoyed by those seeking truth regarding the reason 1.5 million innocents are dead in occupied Iraq, 1.2 million innocents are dead in occupied Afghanistan, and thousands of more innocent men, women and children are dead in occupied Palestine, Lebanon, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia. 9/11 is anything but a false conspiracy; there is overwhelming evidence that American and Israeli officials didn’t just have foreknowledge of the event, but planned the attack and carried it out. It was a Mossad-CIA false flag used to protect the Zionist entity from any future military threat and expand the parasitic hegemony of the US and the illegitimate Tel Aviv regime throughout the world via the Zionist-inspired ‘war on terror (36).’ Someone insulting the seekers of 9/11 truth, slandering the righteous movement of Hezbollah, spreading propaganda about Iran which adds to the demonization campaign levied against the Islamic Republic by the Zionist lobby and the Zionist media, and deliberately leaving out Israeli crimes in occupied Afghanistan and Iraq is no freedom fighter; such a person is a liar and a propagandist.

Wikileaks’ most recent ‘leak’ about occupied Iraq was delivered to several mainstream news outlets including Al-Jazeerah, the Zionist New York Times, Der Spiegel of Germany, which has smeared Hezbollah in the past by despicably accusing the Resistance of selling narcotics (37), Zionist-controlled Le Monde of France which has also smeared Hezbollah recently (38) and The Guardian of the UK, in packages, as if it was some sort of gift for a holiday. This isn’t a leak. This isn’t an expose. This is a press release. This is a media spectacle. This is a circus to cover up real crimes. Those interested in seeing a real leak, in addition to real courage, should read the story of Mordechai Vanunu, who blew the whistle on Israel’s nuclear program and has spent the last 26 years in and out of Israel’s inhumane prisons, including 18 years consecutively with 11 of those years in solitary confinement (39). 

Iraq was annihilated for the Zionist regime, as was Afghanistan. When discussing the destruction of these nations, and the murder of millions of their people, it is integral to the understanding of the crimes committed to discuss the Israeli role in these crimes. Any person or institution failing to do so is ignorant, a coward or a collaborationist. None of these persons have any place in the movement to restore the occupied lands to the indigenous people and bring their tormentors to justice. By supporting Wikileaks, you are not fighting the occupier. You are not honoring the martyrs. You are not combating imperialism. And you are not striking back at the oppressor. You are supporting Israel and the cover-up of the activities of its criminal network. Wikileaks is Zionist poison. Wake up.

~ The End ~

Sources:

(1) Wikileaks Reports Could Halt Iran’s Nuclear Drive by Yaakov Katz, Jerusalem Post

(2) Wikileaks, Afghanistan and Pakistan by Muhammad Abdullah Gul

(3) Framing Pakistan: How The Pro-Israel Media Enables India’s Surrogate Warfare by Maidhc O Cathhail

(4) Intel Expert Says 9/11 Looks Like A Hollywood Show by Christopher Bollyn

(5) The Spoils Of War: Afghanistan’s Multibillion Dollar Heroin Trade by Michel Chossudovsky

(6) Wikileaks Is Israel, Like We All Didn’t Know by Gordon Duff, Veterans Today 

(7) Profile: Unocal by History Commons

(8) The Great Game: The War For Caspian Oil And Gas by Christopher Bollyn

(9) Drugs For Guns: How The Afghan Heroin Trade Is Fueling The Taliban Insurgency by Jerome Starkey, The Independent; Red Mafiya: How The Russian Mob Has Invaded America by Robert Friedman (rip)

(10) Iraq War Documents Shed Light On Civilian Deaths, Prisoner Abuse by David Wood

(11) Iraq War Logs: Private Militarization Run Amok by Pratap Chatterjee, The Guardian

(12) US Shot Down Iranian Drone In Iraq, Wikileaks Confirms by Adam Weinstein

(13) Iraq War Logs Detail Iran’s Aid For Militias by Michael R. Gordon and Andrew W. Lehren, The New York Times

(14) Wikileaks Tip Iran’s Hand In Iraq by Samuel Segev, Winnipeg Free Press

(15) Iraq War Leaks: No US Investigation Of Many Abuses by Al-Masry Al-Youm

(16) Wikileaks Show WMD Hunt Continued In Iraq – With Surprising Results by Noah Shachtman

(17) Iraq Today: Afflicted By Violence, Devastation, Corruption And Desperation by Stephen Lendman

(18) Lawless Arrests, Detentions And Torture In Iraq by Stephen Lendman

(19) Sayyed Nasrallah: Bellemare, UN Protecting False Witnesses by Al-Manar 

(20) Ho Hum, More Wikileaks Chickenfeed by Gordon Duff, Veterans Today

(21) Israeli Drones Said Operating Over Iraq And Afghanistan by Yossi Melman, Haaretz

(22) The Zionist Murderers Of Iraq by Jonathan Azaziah

(23) 55 Zionist Companies Working In Iraq Under Assumed Names by Yaqen News Agency, translated by Muhammad Abu Nasr

(24) Israel Hopes To Colonize Parts of Iraq as ‘Greater Israel’ by Wayne Madsen

(25) Facts Vs. Beliefs –Today’s Ancient Warfare by Jeff Gates

(26) Resistance Kills Mossad Agents In Iraq by The Egyptian Gazette 

(27) Israel’s Battle In Fallujah by Rashid Khashana, Al-Hayat

(28) Iraq IEDs: Mossad/Zapata Engineering Conspiracy? by Cloak and Dagger; Israeli Made IEDs and US Zapata Engineering made IED Triggers Are Killing US, Canadian And NATO Soldiers by NB Gazette

(29) Israeli Officer Sells Weapons To Terrorists In Iraq by Press TV; CIA Death Squads Operating In Iraq by Henry Michaels

(30) Seymour Hersh And The Missing Zionist-Israeli Connection by James Petras

(31) Mossad Does Interrogations in Iraqi Jails: Human Rights Group by China Radio International English; What Were Mossad Agents With Fraudulent New Zealand Passports Doing In Iraq? by Jerry Mazza

(32) US Drone Strikes Kill 18 In Pakistan by Press TV

(33) Mossad And India Spy Agency Team Up, Target Pakistan by Tariq Saeedi

(34) IAEA Report: Zero Evidence Of Iran Nukes. US Orwellian Corporate Media: Iran Building Nukes? by Carl Herman, The Los Angeles Examiner

(35) Wanted By The CIA: The Man Who Keeps No Secrets by Matthew Bell, The Independent

(36) 9/11: Israel’s Grand Deception by Jonathan Azaziah

(37) Hezbollah Denies Der Spiegel’s ‘Cheap Fabrications’ by Al-Manar

(38) Le Monde: A Group Affiliated With Hezbollah Takes Photos Of The Hague by NOW Lebanon

(39) The Woman From Mossad: The Story Of Mordechai Vanunu And The Israeli Nuclear Program by Peter Hounam

Posted by Mask Of Zion at 6:22 AM 

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Labels: Afghanistan Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity in Iraq, Iran, Iraq Genocide, Occupied Afghanistan, Occupied Iraq, US War Crimes, Wars for Israel, Wikileaks, Zionist Criminal Network, Zionist Propaganda

Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison II: Deconstruction Of The Myth

45 comments:

1. 
2. AnonymousNovember 4, 2010 at 10:17 AM

3. Wikileaks was a fraud the minute they discredited 9/11 truth. 9/11 and Israel, here:
   http://www.iuniverse.com/Bookstore/BookDetail.aspx?BookId=SKU-000190526

4. Reply
6. 
7. AnonymousNovember 4, 2010 at 2:49 PM

8. great and well written. Kudos, keep up the good work.

9. Reply
11. 
12. Anonymous

13. Awesome, couldn’t have said it better myself !

14. Reply
16. 
17. Peter Wakefield Sault

18. Spot on. Assange is an indicator of just how desperate the 9/11 psychos are getting.

19. Reply
21. 
22. Anonymous

23. its true, Assange is a shill. fails 911 test big time. its obvious with your eyes open once you’re on the lookout for disinfo. thanks for this article, well said.

24. Reply
26. 
27. Jonathan Azaziah

28. Thank you everyone for reading; all of your comments are sincerely appreciated.

29. Reply
31. 
32. Jonathan Azaziah

33. To Peter Wakefield Sault, Assange and his organization are anything but spot on. As discussed in the article, they are liars and propagandists, and as I will discuss in the follow-up to this piece, plants for the CIA and Mossad.

34. Reply
36. 
37. The Realist Report

38. Jonathan, came across your site via Northerntruthseeker. Just read this piece and it’s the best article I’ve read in a while. Thanks for the work you’re doing. Keep it up.

39. Reply
41. 
42. Bandolero

43. What you are spreading here are very unsubstantiated allegations. See:

44. 1. You claim, Julian Assange is a Zionist agent, because Zionist mouthpiece Jpost says he helped Israel. Funny. I wouldn’t believe Jpost a word. It’s just hasbara, like usual. The opposite is true. The War Logs make it harder for Israel to trick the US public into a new war for Israel, because fewer people in the US will buy the stories of clean.

45. 2. Neither the Afghan War Logs blame PAK for much nor do the Iraq War Logs blame Iran. The opposite is true. These files add proof to allegations of gross US war crimes on a massive scale. They might even be used as evidence to prosecute high-ranking US officials, most of them very friendly with Israel. It will disturb Zionist plans, when those people get prosecuted. To cover up the facts, some Zionist influenced media outlets tried stiockpicking docs from the logs and spin a stories against PAK and Iran from it.

46. 3. Julian Assange said he doesn’t believe in 9/11 conspiracy. About half the world does neither. That is no proof that they are all Zionist agents. And in the end, the official story, that the Bushists didn’t do anything to prevent 9/11, because they were just too busy with planning a war of aggression against Iraq on Israels behalf, isn’t so much different from the allegation, that they were actively involved in helping Mossad to carry out the 9/11-attacks. Both, the official story and the conspiracy allegation are a cry for a tough new investigation and serious prosecution.

47. Reply
49. 
50. Jonathan Azaziah

51. To Bandolero, there is nothing unsubstantiated about what was revealed in this article as there is a list of sources following the conclusion of the piece. All of the information is there for anyone to see.

52. Nowhere was it written that I believed Assange was a Zionist agent due to the musings of Jpost; It was written that Assange fits the profile of a Zionist agent due to his organization saying absolutely nothing about the Zionist destruction of Iraq and the Zionist crimes committed in Afghanistan, some of which were mentioned in the article. A whole book could be written on the Zionist desecration of these nations.

53. Reply

AnonymousNovember 14, 2010 at 1:13 PM

Hi, I think you got ‘the wrong end of the stick’ with a comment up there, 

Peter Wakefield Sault said…

Spot on. Assange is an indicator of just how desperate the 9/11 psychos are getting

He is saying that YOU were spot on, that Assange is a sign that they are getting desperate, the 911 psychos being the zionist regime. 

I had to re read Peter’s comment a few times and i see nothing but praise and agreement from him, try reading it again yourself, I think an apology to Peter is in order !

Reply

JJaneNovember 14, 2010 at 2:24 PM

Amazing critique, beautifully expressed. Thank You.

Reply

Jonathan Azaziah

A blueprint for Tyranny – Report from Iron Mountain

The Millennium Report
December 27, 2015

© see below (fair use)

Report report_from_iron_mountain.pdf

Report from Iron Mountain; Using fear to make people subservient to government.

***************

© 2002 by G. Edward Griffin

Freedom Force International

This is taken from Chapter 24 of The Creature from Jekyll Island

(When added to The Freedom Manifesto, this material should be expanded to include the concept of deliberate waste. With that included, it will make an excellent chapter.)

The substance of these stratagems [for the weakening of the United States so it can be more easily merged into a global government based on the model of collectivism] can be traced to a think-tank study released in 1966 called the Report from Iron Mountain. Although the origin of the report is highly debated, the document itself hints that it was commissioned by the Department of Defense under Defense Secretary, Robert McNamara and was produced by the Hudson Institute located at the base of Iron Mountain in Croton-on-Hudson, New York. The Hudson Institute was founded and directed by Herman Kahn, formerly of the Rand Corporation. Both McNamara and Kahn were members of the CFR.

The self-proclaimed purpose of the study was to explore various ways to “stabilize society.” Praiseworthy as that may sound, a reading of the Report soon reveals that the word society is used synonymously with the word government. Furthermore, the word stabilize is used as meaning to preserve and to perpetuate. It is clear from the start that the nature of the study was to analyze the different ways a government can perpetuate itself in power, ways to control its citizens and prevent them from rebelling. It was stated at the beginning of the Report that morality was not an issue. The study did not address questions of right or wrong; nor did it deal with such concepts as freedom or human rights. Ideology was not an issue, nor patriotism, nor religious precepts. Its sole concern was how to perpetuate the existing government. The Report said: 

Previous studies have taken the desirability of peace, the importance of human life, the superiority of democratic institutions, the greatest “good” for the greatest number, the “dignity” of the individual, the desirability of maximum health and longevity, and other such wishful premises as axiomatic values necessary for the justification of a study of peace issues. We have not found them so. We have attempted to apply the standards of physical science to our thinking, the principal characteristic of which is not quantification, as is popularly believed, but that, in Whitehead’s words, “…it ignores all judgments of value; for instance, all esthetic and moral judgments.” (1)

The major conclusion of the report was that, in the past, war has been the only reliable means to achieve that goal. It contends that only during times of war or the threat of war are the masses compliant enough to carry the yoke of government without complaint. Fear of conquest and pillage by an enemy can make almost any burden seem acceptable by comparison. War can be used to arouse human passion and patriotic feelings of loyalty to the nation’s leaders. No amount of sacrifice in the name of victory will be rejected. Resistance is viewed as treason. But, in times of peace, people become resentful of high taxes, shortages, and bureaucratic intervention. When they become disrespectful of their leaders, they become dangerous. No government has long survived without enemies and armed conflict. War, therefore, has been an indispensable condition for “stabilizing society.” These are the report’s exact words:

The war system not only has been essential to the existence of nations as independent political entities, but has been equally indispensable to their stable political structure. Without it, no government has ever been able to obtain acquiescence in its “legitimacy,” or right to rule its society. The possibility of war provides the sense of external necessity without which no government can long remain in power. The historical record reveals one instance after another where the failure of a regime to maintain the credibility of a war threat led to its dissolution, by the forces of private interest, of reactions to social injustice, or of other disintegrative elements. The organization of society for the possibility of war is its principal political stabilizer…. It has enabled societies to maintain necessary class distinctions, and it has insured the subordination of the citizens to the state by virtue of the residual war powers inherent in the concept of nationhood. (2)

A NEW DEFINITION OF PEACE

The report then explains that we are approaching a point in history where the old formulas may no longer work. Why? Because it may now be possible to create a world government in which all nations will be disarmed and disciplined by a world army, a condition which will be called peace. The report says: “The word peace, as we have used it in the following pages, … implies total and general disarmament.” (3)

Under that scenario, independent nations will no longer exist and governments will not have the capability to wage war. There could be military action by the world army against renegade political subdivisions, but these would be called peace-keeping operations, and soldiers would be called peace keepers. No matter how much property is destroyed or how much blood is spilled, the bullets will be “peaceful” bullets and the bombs – even atomic bombs, if necessary – will be “peaceful” bombs.

The report then raises the question of whether there can ever be a suitable substitute for war. What else could the regional governments use – and what could the world government itself use – to legitimize and perpetuate itself? To provide an answer to that question was the stated purpose of the study.

The Report from Iron Mountain concludes that there can be no substitute for war unless it possesses three properties. It must (1) be economically wasteful, (2) represent a credible threat of great magnitude, and (3) provide a logical excuse for compulsory service to the government.

A SOPHISTICATED FORM OF SLAVERY

On the subject of compulsory service, the Report explains that one of the advantages of standing armies is that they provide a place for the government to put antisocial and dissident elements of society. In the absence of war, these forced-labor battalions would be told they are fighting poverty or cleaning up the planet or bolstering the economy or serving the common good in some other fashion. Every teenager would be required to serve – especially during those years in which young people are most rebellious against authority. Older people, too, would be drafted as a means of working off tax payments and fines. Dissidents would face heavy fines for “hate crimes” and politically incorrect attitudes so, eventually, they would all be in the forced-labor battalions. The Report says:

We will examine … the time-honored use of military institutions to provide anti-social elements with an acceptable role in the social structure. … The current euphemistic clichés – “juvenile delinquency” and “alienation” – have had their counterparts in every age. In earlier days these conditions were dealt with directly by the military without the complications of due process, usually through press gangs or outright enslavement. …

Most proposals that address themselves, explicitly or otherwise, to the postwar problem of controlling the socially alienated turn to some variant of the Peace Corps or the so-called Job Corps for a solution. The socially disaffected, the economically unprepared, the psychologically uncomfortable, the hard-core “delinquents,” the incorrigible “subversives,” and the rest of the unemployable are seen as somehow transformed by the disciplines of a service modeled on military precedent into more or less dedicated social service workers. …

Another possible surrogate for the control of potential enemies of society is the reintroduction, in some form consistent with modern technology and political processes, of slavery. … It is entirely possible that the development of a sophisticated form of slavery may be an absolute prerequisite for socialcontrol in a world at peace. As a practical matter, conversion of the code of military discipline to a euphemized form of enslavement would entail surprisingly little revision; the logical first step would be the adoption of some form of “universal” military service. (4)

BLOOD GAMES

The Report considered ways in which the public could be preoccupied with non-important activities so that it would not have time to participate in political debate or resistance. Recreation, trivial game shows, pornography, and situation comedies could play an important role, but blood games were considered to be the most promising of all the options. Blood games are competitive events between individuals or teams that are sufficiently violent in nature to enable the spectators to vicariously work off their frustrations. As a minimum, these events must evoke a passionate team loyalty on the part of the fans and must include the expectation of pain and injury on the part of the players. Even better for their purpose is the spilling of blood and the possibility of death. The common man has a morbid fascination for violence and blood. Crowds gather to chant “Jump! Jump!” at the suicidal figure on a hotel roof. Cars slow to a near stop on the highway to gawk at broken bodies next to a collision.

A schoolyard fight instantly draws a circle of spectators. Boxing matches and football games and hockey games and automobile races are telecast daily, attracting millions of cheering fans who give rapt attention to each moment of danger, each angry blow to the face, each broken bone, each knockout, each carrying away of the unconscious or possibly dying contestant. In this fashion, their anger at “society” is defused and focused, instead, on the opposing team. The emperors of Rome devised the Circuses and gladiator contests and public executions by wild beasts for precisely that purpose.

Before jumping to the conclusion that such concepts are absurd in modern times, recall that during the 1985 European soccer championship in Belgium, the spectators became so emotionally involved in the contest that a bloody riot broke out in the bleachers leaving behind 38 dead and more that 400 injured. U.S. News & World Report gives this account:

The root of the trouble: A tribal loyalty to home teams that surpasses an obsession and, say some experts, has become a substitute religion for many. The worst offenders include members of gangs such as Chelsea’s Anti-Personnel Firm, made up of ill-educated young males who find in soccer rivalry an escape from boredom.

Still, the British do not have a patent on soccer violence. On May 26, eight people were killed and more than 50 injured in Mexico City,… a 1964 stadium riot in Lima, Peru, killed more than 300 – and a hotly disputed 1969 match between El Salvador and Honduras led to a week-long shooting war between the two countries, causing hundreds of casualties.

The U.S. is criticized for the gridiron violence of its favorite sport, football, but outbursts in the bleachers are rare because loyalties are spread among many sports and national pride is not at stake. Said Thomas Tutko, professor of psychology at California’s San Jose State University: “In these other countries, it used to be their armies. Now it’s their competitive teams that stir passions.” (5)

Having considered all the ramifications of blood games, The Report from Iron Mountain concluded that they were not an adequate substitute for war. It is true that violent sports are useful distracters and do, in fact, allow an outlet for boredom and fierce group loyalty, but their effect on the nation’s psyche could not match the intensity of war hysteria. Until a better alternative could be found, world government would have to be postponed so that nations could continue to wage war.

FINDING A CREDIBLE GLOBAL THREAT

In time of war, most citizens uncomplainingly accept their low quality of life and remain fiercely loyal to their leaders. If a suitable substitute for war is to be found, then it must also elicit that same reaction. Therefore, a new enemy must be found that threatens the entire world, and the prospects of being overcome by that enemy must be just as terrifying as war itself. The Report is emphatic on that point:

Allegiance requires a cause; a cause requires an enemy. This much is obvious; the critical point is that the enemy that defines the cause must seem genuinely formidable. Roughly speaking, the presumed power of the “enemy” sufficient to warrant an individual sense of allegiance to a society must be proportionate to the size and complexity of the society. Today, of course, that power must be one of unprecedented magnitude and frightfulness. (6)

The first consideration in finding a suitable threat to serve as a global enemy was that it did not have to be real. A real one would be better, of course, but an invented one would work just as well, provided the masses could be convinced it was real. The public will more readily believe some fictions than others. Credibility would be more important than truth.

Poverty was examined as a potential global enemy but rejected as not fearful enough. Most of the world was already in poverty. Only those who had never experienced poverty would see it as a global threat. For the rest, it was simply a fact of everyday life.

An invasion by aliens from outer space was given serious consideration. The report said that experiments along those lines already may have been tried. Public reaction, however, was not sufficiently predictable, because the threat was not “credible.” Here is what the report had to say:

Credibility, in fact, lies at the heart of the problem of developing a political substitute for war. This is where the space-race proposals, in many ways so well suited as economic substitutes for war, fall short. The most ambitious and unrealistic space project cannot of itself generate a believable external menace. It has been hotly argued that such a menace would offer the “last best hope of peace,” etc., by uniting mankind against the danger of destruction by “creatures” from other planets or from outer space. Experiments have been proposed to test the credibility of an out-of-our-world invasion threat; it is possible that a few of the more difficult-to-explain “flying saucer” incidents of recent years were in fact early experiments of this kind. If so, they could hardly have been judged encouraging. (7)

This report was released in 1966 when the idea of an alien presence seemed far fetched to the average person. In the ensuing years, however, that perception has changed. A growing segment of the population now believes that intelligent life forms may exist beyond our planet and could be monitoring our own civilization. Whether that belief is right or wrong is not the issue here. The point is that a dramatic encounter with aliens shown on network television – even if it were to be entirely fabricated by high-tech computer graphics or laser shows in the sky – could be used to stampede all nations into world government supposedly to defend the Earth from invasion. On the other hand, if the aliens were perceived to have peaceful intent, an alternative scenario would be to form world government to represent a unified human species speaking with a single voice in some kind of galactic federation. Either scenario would be far more credible today than in 1966.

THE ENVIRONMENTAL-POLLUTION MODEL

The final candidate for a useful global threat was pollution of the environment. This was viewed as the most likely to succeed because it could be related to observable conditions such as smog and water pollution– in other words, it would be based partly on fact and, therefore, be credible. Predictions could be made showing end-of-earth scenarios just as horrible as atomic warfare. Accuracy in these predictions would not be important. Their purpose would be to frighten, not to inform. It might even be necessary to deliberately poison the environment to make the predictions more convincing and to focus the public mind on fighting a new enemy, more fearful than any invader from another nation – or even from outer space. The masses would more willingly accept a falling standard of living, tax increases, and bureaucratic intervention in their lives as simply “the price we must pay to save Mother Earth.” A massive battle against death and destruction from global pollution possibly could replace war as justification for social control.

Did The Report from Iron Mountain really say that? It certainly did – and much more. Here are just a few of the pertinent passages:

When it comes to postulating a credible substitute for war … the “alternate enemy” must imply a more immediate, tangible, and directly felt threat of destruction. It must justify the need for taking and paying a “blood price” in wide areas of human concern. In this respect, the possible substitute enemies noted earlier would be insufficient. One exception might be the environmental-pollution model, if the danger to society it posed was genuinely imminent. The fictive models would have to carry the weight of extraordinary conviction, underscored with a not inconsiderable actual sacrifice of life. … It may be, for instance, that gross pollution of the environment can eventually replace the possibility of mass destruction by nuclear weapons as the principal apparent threat to the survival of the species. Poisoning of the air, and of the principal sources of food and water supply, is already well advanced, and at first glance would seem promising in this respect; it constitutes a threat that can be dealt with only through social organization and political power. …

It is true that the rate of pollution could be increased selectively for this purpose. … But the pollution problem has been so widely publicized in recent years that it seems highly improbable that a program of deliberate environmental poisoning could be implemented in a politically acceptable manner.

However unlikely some of the possible alternative enemies we have mentioned may seem, we must emphasize that one must be found of credible quality and magnitude, if a transition to peace is ever to come about without social disintegration. It is more probable, in our judgment, that such a threat will have to be invented. (8)

AUTHENTICITY OF THE REPORT

The Report from Iron Mountain states that it was produced by a Special Study Group of fifteen men whose identities were to remain secret and that it was not intended to be made public. One member of the group, however, felt the Report was too important to be kept under wraps. He was not in disagreement with its conclusions. He merely believed that more people should read it. He delivered his personal copy to Leonard Lewin, a well-known author and columnist who, in turn, negotiated its publication by Dial Press. It was then reprinted by Dell Publishing.

This was during the Johnson Administration, and the President’s Special Assistant for National Security Affairs was CFR member Walt Rostow. Rostow was quick to announce that the report was a spurious work. Herman Kahn, CFR director of the Hudson Institute, said it was not authentic. The Washington Post – which was owned and run by CFR member Katharine Graham – called it “a delightful satire.” Time magazine, founded by CFR-member Henry Luce, said it was a skillful hoax.

Then, on November 26, 1967, the Report was reviewed in the book section of the Washington Post by Herschel McLandress, which was the pen name for Harvard professor John Kenneth Galbraith. Galbraith, who also had been a member of the CFR, said that he knew firsthand of the Report’s authenticity because he had been invited to participate in it. Although he was unable to be part of the official group, he was consulted from time to time and had been asked to keep the project a secret. Furthermore, while he doubted the wisdom of letting the public know about the Report, he agreed totally with its conclusions. He wrote:

As I would put my personal repute behind the authenticity of this document, so would I testify to the validity of its conclusions. My reservations relate only to the wisdom of releasing it to an obviously unconditioned public. (9)

Six weeks later, in an Associated Press dispatch from London, Galbraith went even further and jokingly admitted that he was “a member of the conspiracy.”(10)

That, however, did not settle the issue. The following day, Galbraith backed off. When asked about his “conspiracy” statement, he replied: “For the first time since Charles II The Times has been guilty of a misquotation. … Nothing shakes my conviction that it was written by either Dean Rusk or Mrs. Clare Booth Luce.” (11)

The reporter who conducted the original interview was embarrassed by the allegation and did further research. Six days later, this is what he reported: Misquoting seems to be a hazard to which Professor Galbraith is prone. The latest edition of the Cambridge newspaper Varsity quotes the following (tape recorded) interchange:

Interviewer: “Are you aware of the identity of the author of Report from Iron Mountain?”

Galbraith: “I was in general a member of the conspiracy but I was not the author. I have always assumed that it was the man who wrote the foreword – Mr. Lewin.” (12)

So, on at least three occasions, Galbraith publicly endorsed the authenticity of the Report but denied that he wrote it. Then who did? Was it Leonard Lewin, after all? In 1967 he said he did not. In 1972 he said that he did. Writing in The New York Times Book Review Lewin explained: “I wrote the ‘Report,” all of it. … What I intended was simply to pose the issues of war and peace in a provocative way.” (13)

But wait! A few years before that, columnist William F. Buckley told the New York Times that he was the author. That statement was undoubtedly made tongue-in-cheek, but who and what are we to believe? Was it written by Herman Kahn, John Kenneth Galbraith, Dean Rusk, Clare Booth Luce, Leonard Lewin, or William F. Buckley?

In the final analysis, it makes little difference. The important point is that The Report from Iron Mountain, whether written as a think-tank study or a political satire, explains the reality that surrounds us. Regardless of its origin, the concepts presented in it are now being implemented in almost every detail. All one has to do is hold the Report in one hand and the daily newspaper in the other to realize that every major trend in American life is conforming to the blueprint. So many things that otherwise are incomprehensible suddenly become clear: foreign aid, wasteful spending, the destruction of American industry, a job corps, gun control, a national police force, the apparent demise of Soviet power, a UN army, disarmament, a world bank, a world money, the surrender of national independence through treaties, and the ecology hysteria. The Report from Iron Mountain is an accurate summary of the plan that has already created our present. It is now shaping our future.

ENVIRONMENTALISM A SUBSTITUTE FOR WAR

It is beyond the scope of this study to prove that currently accepted predictions of environmental doom are based on exaggerated and fraudulent “scientific studies.” But such proof is easily found if one is willing to look at the raw data and the assumptions upon which the projections are based. More important, however, is the question of why end-of-world scenarios based on phony scientific studies – or no studies at all – are uncritically publicized by the CFR-controlled media; or why radical environmental groups advocating collectivist doctrine and anti-business programs are lavishly funded by CFR-dominated foundations, banks, and corporations, the very groups that would appear to have the most to lose. The Report from Iron Mountain answers those questions.

As the Report pointed out, truth is not important in these matters. It’s what people can be made to believe that counts. “Credibility” is the key, not reality. There is just enough truth in the fact of environmental pollution to make predictions of planetary doom in the year two-thousand-something seem believable. All that is required is media cooperation and repetition. The plan has apparently worked. People of the industrialized nations have been subjected to a barrage of documentaries, dramas, feature films, ballads, poems, bumper stickers, posters, marches, speeches, seminars, conferences, and concerts. The result has been phenomenal. Politicians are now elected to office on platforms consisting of nothing more than an expressed concern for the environment and a promise to clamp down on those nasty industries. No one questions the damage done to the economy or the nation. It makes no difference when the very planet on which we live is sick and dying. Not one in a thousand will question that underlying premise. How could it be false? Look at all the movie celebrities and rock stars who have joined the movement.

While the followers of the environmental movement are preoccupied with visions of planetary doom, let us see what the leaders are thinking. The first Earth Day was proclaimed on April 22, 1970, at a “Summit” meeting in Rio de Janeiro, attended by environmentalists and politicians from all over the world. A publication widely circulated at that meeting was entitled the Environmental Handbook. The main theme of the book was summarized by a quotation from Princeton Professor Richard A. Falk, a member of the CFR. Falk wrote that there are four interconnected threats to the planet – wars of mass destruction, overpopulation, pollution, and the depletion of resources. Then he said: “The basis of all four problems is the inadequacy of the sovereign states to manage the affairs of mankind in the twentieth century.” (14)

The Handbook continued the CFR line by asking these rhetorical questions: “Are nation-states actually feasible, now that they have power to destroy each other in a single afternoon?… What price would most people be willing to pay for a more durable kind of human organization – more taxes, giving up national flags, perhaps the sacrifice of some of our hard-won liberties?” (15)

In 1989, the CFR-owned Washington Post published an article written by CFR member George Kennan in which he said: “We must prepare instead for … an age where the great enemy is not the Soviet Union, but the rapid deterioration of our planet as a supporting structure for civilized life.” (16)

On March 27, 1990, in the CFR-controlled New York Times, CFR member Michael Oppenheimer wrote: “Global warming, ozone depletion, deforestation and overpopulation are the four horsemen of a looming 21st century apocalypse. … as the cold war recedes, the environment is becoming the No. 1 international security concern.” (17)

CFR member, Lester Brown, heads up another think tank called the Worldwatch Institute. In the Institute’s annual report, entitled State of the World 1991, Brown said that “the battle to save the planet will replace the battle over ideology as the organizing theme of the new world order.” (18)

In the official publication of the 1992 Earth Summit, we find this: “The world community now faces together greater risks to our common security through our impacts on the environment than from traditional military conflicts with one another.”

How many times does it have to be explained? The environmental movement was created by the CFR. It is a substitute for war that they hope will become the emotional and psychological foundation for world government.

HUMANITY ITSELF IS THE TARGET

The Club of Rome is a group of global planners who annually release end-of-world scenarios based on predictions of overpopulation and famine. Their membership is international, but the American roster includes such well-known CFR members as Jimmy Carter, Harlan Cleveland, Claiburne Pell, and Sol Linowitz. Their solution to overpopulation? A world government to control birth rates and, if necessary, euthanasia. That is a gentle word for the deliberate killing of the old, the weak, and of course the uncooperative. Following the same reasoning advanced at Iron Mountain, the Club of Rome has concluded that fear of environmental disaster could be used as a substitute enemy for the purpose of unifying the masses behind its program. In its 1991 book entitled The First Global Revolution, we find this:

In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. … All these dangers are caused by human intervention. … The real enemy, then, is humanity itself. (19)

Collectivist theoreticians have always been fascinated by the possibility of controlling population growth. It excites their imaginations because it is the ultimate bureaucratic plan. If the real enemy is humanity itself, as the Club of Rome says, then humanity itself must become the target. Fabian Socialist Bertrand Russell expressed it thus:

I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. … War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. …

A scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is world government. … It will be necessary to find ways of preventing an increase in world population. If this is to be done otherwise than by wars, pestilences and famines, it will demand a powerful international authority. This authority should deal out the world’s food to the various nations in proportion to their population at the time of the establishments of the authority. If any nation subsequently increased its population, it should not on that account receive any more food. The motive for not increasing population would therefore be very compelling. (21)

Very compelling, indeed. These quiet-spoken collectivists are not kidding around. For example, one of the most visible “environmentalists” and advocate of population control was Jacques Cousteau. Interviewed by the United Nations UNESCO Courier in November of 1991, Cousteau spelled it out. He said:

What should we do to eliminate suffering and disease? It is a wonderful idea but perhaps not altogether a beneficial one in the long run. If we try to implement it we may jeopardize the future of our species. It’s terrible to have to say this. World population must be stabilized, and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. This is so horrible to contemplate that we shouldn’t even say it, but it is just as bad not to say it. (22)

GORBACHEV BECOMES AN ECOLOGY WARRIOR

We can now understand how Mikhail Gorbachev, formerly the leader of one of the most repressive governments the world has known, became head of a new organization called the International Green Cross, which supposedly is dedicated to environmental issues. Gorbachev has never denounced collectivism, only the label of a particular brand of collectivism called Communism. His real interest is not ecology but world government with himself assured a major position in the collectivist power structure. In a public appearance in Fulton, Missouri, he praised the Club of Rome, of which he is a member, for its position on population control. Then he said:

One of the worst of the new dangers is ecological. … Today, global climatic shifts; the greenhouse effect; the “ozone hole”; acid rain; contamination of the atmosphere, soil and water by industrial and household waste; the destruction of the forests; etc. all threaten the stability of the planet. (23)

Gorbachev proclaimed that global government was the answer to these threats and that the use of government force was essential. He said: “I believe that the new world order will not be fully realized unless the United Nations and its Security Council create structures … authorized to impose sanctions and make use of other measures of compulsion.” (24)

Here is an arch criminal who fought his way up through the ranks of the Soviet Communist Party, became the protégé of Yuri Andropov, head of the dreaded KGB, was a member of the USSR’s ruling Politburo throughout the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and who was selected by the Politburo in 1985 as the supreme leader of world Communism. All of this was during one of the Soviet’s most dismal periods of human-rights violations and subversive activities against the free world. Furthermore, he ruled over a nation with one of the worst possible records of environmental destruction. At no time while he was in power did he ever say or do anything to show concern over planet Earth.

All that is now forgotten. Gorbachev has been transformed by the CFR-dominated media into an ecology warrior. He is calling for world government and telling us that such a government will use environmental issues as justification for sanctions and other “measures of compulsion.” We cannot say that we were not warned.

U.S. BRANDED AS ECOLOGICAL AGGRESSOR

The use of compulsion is an important point in these plans. People in the industrialized nations are not expected to cooperate in their own demise. They will have to be forced. They will not like it when their food is taken for global distribution. They will not approve when they are taxed by a world authority to finance foreign political projects. They will not voluntarily give up their cars or resettle into smaller houses or communal barracks to satisfy the resource-allocation quotas of a UN agency. Club-of-Rome member Maurice Strong states the problem:

In effect, the United States is committing environmental aggression against the rest of the world. … At the military level, the United States is the custodian. At the environmental level, the United States is clearly the greatest risk. … One of the worst problems in the United States is energy prices – they’re too low. …

It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class … involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and `convenience’ foods, ownership of motor-vehicles, numerous electric household appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning … expansive suburban housing … are not sustainable. (25)

Mr. Strong’s remarks were enthusiastically received by world environmental leaders, but they prompted this angry editorial response in the Arizona Republic:

Translated from eco-speak, this means two things: (1) a reduction in the standard of living in Western nations through massive new taxes and regulations, and (2) a wholesale transfer of wealth from industrialized to under-developed countries. The dubious premise here is that if the U.S. economy could be reduced to, say, the size of Malaysia’s, the world would be a better place. … Most Americans probably would balk at the idea of the U.N. banning automobiles in the U.S. (26)

Who is this Maurice Strong who sees the United States as the environmental aggressor against the world? Does he live in poverty? Does he come from a backward country that is resentful of American prosperity? Does he himself live in modest circumstances, avoiding consumption in order to preserve our natural resources? None of the above. He is one of the wealthiest men in the world. He lives and travels in great comfort. He is a lavish entertainer. In addition to having great personal wealth derived from the oil industry in Canada – which he helped nationalize – Maurice Strong was the Secretary-General of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio; head of the 1972 UN Conference on Human Environment in Stockholm; the first Secretary-General of the UN Environment Program; president of the World Federation of United Nations; co-chairman of the World Economic Forum; member of the Club of Rome; trustee of the Aspen Institute; and a director of the World Future Society. That is probably more than you wanted to know about this man, but it is necessary in order to appreciate the importance of what follows.

A PLOT FOR ECONOMIC CRISIS

Maurice Strong believes – or says that he believes – the world’s ecosystems can be preserved only if the affluent nations of the world can be disciplined into lowering their standard of living. Production and consumption must be curtailed. To bring that about, those nations must submit to rationing, taxation, and political domination by world government. They will probably not do that voluntarily, he says, so they will have to be forced. To accomplish that, it will be necessary to engineer a global monetary crisis which will destroy their economic systems. Then they will have no choice but to accept assistance and control from the UN.

This strategy was revealed in the May, 1990, issue of West magazine, published in Canada. In an article entitled “The Wizard of Baca Grande,” journalist Daniel Wood described his week-long experience at Strong’s private ranch in southern Colorado. This ranch has been visited by such CFR notables as David Rockefeller, Secretary-of-State Henry Kissinger, founder of the World Bank Robert McNamara, and the presidents of such organizations as IBM, Pan Am, and Harvard.

During Wood’s stay at the ranch, the tycoon talked freely about environmentalism and politics. To express his own world view, he said he was planning to write a novel about a group of world leaders who decided to save the planet. As the plot unfolded, it became obvious that it was based on real people and real events. Wood continues the story:

Each year, he explains as background to the telling of the novel’s plot, the World Economic Forum convenes in Davos, Switzerland. Over a thousand CEOs, prime ministers, finance ministers, and leading academics gather in February to attend meetings and set economic agendas for the year ahead. With this as a setting, he then says: “What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? … The group’s conclusion is `no.’ the rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about? …

“This group of world leaders,” he continues, “form a secret society to bring about an economic collapse. It’s February. They’re all at Davos. These aren’t terrorists. They’re world leaders. They have positioned themselves in the world’s commodity and stock markets. They’ve engineered, using their access to stock exchanges and computers and gold supplies, a panic. Then, they prevent the world’s stock markets from closing. They jam the gears. They hire mercenaries who hold the rest of the world leaders at Davos as hostages. The markets can’t close. The rich countries…” And Strong makes a slight motion with his fingers as if he were flicking a cigarette butt out the window.

I sit there spellbound. This is not any storyteller talking, this is Maurice Strong. He knows these world leaders. He is, in fact, co-chairman of the Council of the World Economic Forum. He sits at the fulcrum of power. He is in a position to do it.“I probably shouldn’t be saying things like this,” he says. (27)

Maurice Strong’s fanciful plot probably shouldn’t be taken too seriously, at least in terms of a literal reading of future events. It is unlikely they will unfold in exactly that manner – although it is not impossible. For one thing, it would not be necessary to hold the leaders of the industrialized nations at gun point. They would be the ones engineering this plot. Leaders from Third-World countries do not have the means to cause a global crisis. That would have to come from the money centers in New York, London, or Tokyo. Furthermore, the masterminds behind this thrust for global government have always resided in the industrialized nations. They have come from the ranks of the CFR in America and from other branches of the International Roundtable in England, France, Belgium, Canada, Japan, and elsewhere. They are the ideological descendants of Cecil Rhodes and they are fulfilling his dream.

It is not important whether or not Maurice Strong’s plot for global economic collapse is to be taken literally. What is important is that men like him are thinking along those lines. As Wood pointed out, they are in a position to do it. Or something like it. If it is not this scenario, they will consider another one with similar consequences. If history has proven anything, it is that men with financial and political power are quite capable of heinous plots against their fellow men. They have launched wars, caused depressions, and created famines to suit their personal agendas. We have little reason to believe that the world leaders of today are more saintly than their predecessors.

Furthermore, we must not be fooled by pretended concern for Mother Earth. The call-to-arms for saving the planet is a gigantic ruse. There is just enough truth to environmental pollution to make the show “credible,” as The Report from Iron Mountain phrased it, but the end-of-earth scenarios which drive the movement forward are bogus. The real objective in all of this is world government, the ultimate doomsday mechanism from which there can be no escape. Destruction of the economic strength of the industrialized nations is merely a necessary prerequisite for ensnaring them into the global web. The thrust of the current ecology movement is directed totally to that end.

***********

by G. Edward Griffin.

It may be obtained at www.realityzone.com.

References:

1

Leonard Lewin, ed., Report from Iron Mountain on the possibility and the Desirability of Peace

(New York: Dell Publishing, 1976), pp.13-14.

2

Ibid. pp. 39, 81.

3

Ibid. p. 9. 3

4

Ibid., pp. 41-42,68, 70.

5

“British Soccer’s Day of Shame,” U.S. News & World Report, June 10, 1985, p. 11.

6

Lewin, Report, p. 44. 6

7

Ibid., p. 66. 7

8

Ibid., pp. 66-67, 70-71. When the Report was written, terrorism had not yet been considered as a substitute for war. Since then, it has become the most useful of them all.

9

“News of War and Peace You’re Not Ready For,” by Herschel McLandress, Book World, in The

Washington Post, Nov. 26, 1967, p. 5.

10

“The Times Diary,” London Times, Feb. 5, 1968, p.8.

11

“Galbraith Says He Was Misquoted, “ London Times, Feb. 6, 1968, p. 3.

12

“Touche, Professor,” London Times, Feb. 12, 1968, p, 8. 9

13

“Report from Iron Mountain,” New Your Times, March 19, 1968, p. 8. 10

14

Garrett de Bell, ed., The Environmental Handbook (New York: Ballantine / Friends of the Earth,

1970), p. 138.

15

Ibid., p. 145.

16

A Europe Now Free from A Confining Cold War Vision,” by George Kennan, (Washington Post

syndication, Sacramento Bee, Nov. 14, 1989, p. B7.

17

The New York Times has been one of the principal means by which CFR policies are inserted into

the mainstream of public opinion. The paper was purchased in 1896 by Alfred Ochs, with financial

backing from CFR pioneer J.P. Morgan, Rothchild agent August Belmont, and Jacob Schiff, a partner in Kuhn, Loeb & Co. It is now owned by CFR member Arthur Sulzberger, who is also the

publisher, and it is staffed by numerous CFR editors and columnists. See Shadows of Power by

James Perloff (Appleton, Wisconsin: Western Islands, 1988), p. 181.

18

Lester R. Brown, “The New World Order,” in Lester R. Brown et al., State of the World 1991; A

Worldwatch Institute Report on Progress Toward A Sustainable Society (New York: W.W. Norton,

1991), p. 3.

19

Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, The First Global Revolution, A Report by the Council of

the Club of Rome, (New York: Pantheon Books, 1991). P. 115.

20

See Martin, Rose, Fabian Freeway; High Road to Socialism in the U.S.A. (Boston: Western

Islands, 1966), pp. 171, 325, 463-69.

21

Bertrand Arthur William Russell, The Impact of Science on Society (New York: Simon and

Schuster, 1953), pp. 103-104, 111.

22

Interviewed by Bahgat Eluadi and Adel Rifaat, Courrier de l’Unesco, Nov. 1991, p. 13.

23

Michail Gorbachev, “The River of Time and the Necessity of Action,” 46^thJohn Findley Greed

Foundation Lecture, Westminster College, Fulton, Missouri, May 6, 1992, transcript from

Westminster College Department of Press Relations, p. 6.

24

Ibid., p. 9. 14

25

“Ecology Remedy Costly,” (AP), Sacramento Bee, March 12, 1992, p. A8. Also Maurice Strong,

Introduction to Jim MacNeil, Pieter Winsemius, and Taizo Yakushiji, Beyond Interdependence,

(New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), p. ix.

26

“Road to Ruin,” Arizona Republic, March 26, 1992.

27

“The Wizard of Baca Grande.” By Daniel Wood, West magazine, May 1990, p. 35.

—
http://farmwars.info/?p=4881

Source

https://archive.org/details/ReportFromIronMountain135/page/n3

DAS PHANTASIE UNIVERSUM VON FULFORD UND CO.

Veröffentlicht am 7. Juni 2015von stevenblack214 Kommentare

geschrieben von Steven Black:

Auf den letzten Beitrag gab es Kommentare, ich würde es mir quasi leicht machen, Leute wie Fulford, Cobra, David Wilcock und viele andere, “einfach mit einem Wisch ins Absurde zu führen.” Und die in der Frage gipfelten, ob ich das “fundamentiert widerlegen” könnte, was Fullford und Konsorten so behaupten. Gute Frage, DAS nenn ich mal eine echte Herausforderung. Na schön, dann gehe ich das jetzt an. 

Ich persönlich beschäftige mich etwa seit 1997 mit dem ganzen “Verschwörungskram”, seit 2007 schreibe ich im Internet, gute 3 – 4 Jahre davon waren den Themen Rothschild, Rockefeller, Geheimgesellschaften, Wirtschaft, Politik und Co. gewidmet. Mir ist bei diesen Themen kaum mehr etwas fremd, dafür habe ich zu viel Recherche betrieben. Ich kann also durchaus behaupten, ein wenig Überblick zu haben und nicht nur Sachen, die andere Leute aufbrachten, wiederzukäuen. Natürlich habe ich das auch gemacht, wie ich überhaupt nahezu jeden Fehler begangen habe, den man beim schreiben wahrscheinlich machen kann. Aber Fehler machen ist gut, so lernte ich zu reflektieren und selber zu denken.    

Ob ich Fulford, Wilcock und Co. “fundamentiert widerlegen” kann ist wirklich eine außerordentliche Herausforderung. Weil, wie widerlegst du die Existenz eines “La La Universums”, insbesondere, wenn da offensichtlich tatsächlich Leute “zu wohnen” scheinen? Dann muss es doch real sein, oder? Äh, nein, nur weil der menschliche Geist fähig ist, in einem Phantasieuniversum zu leben, bedeutet es leider noch nicht, dies wäre auch real. Vielleicht hilft etwas altmodischer, gesunder Hausverstand – mal sehen: 

Eines noch vorweg – bitte verzeiht, wenn sich dann und wann etwaige sarkastische Bemerkungen nicht vermeiden lassen. 

Also gut, der Stern von Benjamin Fulford ging im Jahre 2007 im Internet auf, mit einem ziemlich überraschenden Coup. Man stelle sich vor, da kommt ein bislang Unbekannter und schafft es, David Rockefeller himself für ein Interview zu bekommen und stellt es dann ins Internet. Also das war ein ziemlicher Knüller und hat auch eingeschlagen wie eine Bombe. Um eine lange Geschichte einigermaßen kurz zu halten – die Botschaft hatte es in sich:

Es ging um ein angebliches Ultimatum, welches eine chinesische Geheimgesellschaft den Illuminati gestellt hat. Dafür suchten sie sich ausgerechnet Ben Fulford aus, um diese Nachricht den Illuminati zu überbringen. Die Illuminati sollten bitteschön so nett sein, ihre Entvölkerungspläne einzupacken, ansonsten würde die sage und schreibe mit 6 Millionen Mitgliedern angegebene, chinesische Geheimgesellschaft, inklusive ihrer etwa 1, 8 Millionen Gangster und 100.000 professionelle Killer, die Illuminati “entsorgen”. WOW! Hey, ich meine, was für eine Story. Kein Wunder, dass die Aufregung über diesen Coup groß war. 

Und Fulford war nicht irgendwer, zumindest nicht in der Welt der journalistischen Berichterstattung. Der Mann war immerhin ehemaliger Büroleiter von “Forbes” in Asien. Was bedeutet, dass hier jemand durchaus politische Themen beherrschte. Er schrieb auch mehrere Besteller auf japanisch, eines davon über 9/11. 

O – Ton Fulford:

„Bisher habe ich den Illuminati mitgeteilt, dass sie keinen weiteren japanischen Politiker töten dürfen. Mein Plan sieht vor, diesen Schutz auf alle westlichen Politiker auszudehnen. Sollten die Illuminati Ron Paul, Barack Obama oder einen anderen Politiker ermorden oder es auch nur versuchen, dann gnade ihnen Gott.“

„Als friedliebender und lockerer Kanadier, der plötzlich mit so großer Verantwortung betraut ist, möchte ich mich für die schwächsten Menschen und Kreaturen des Planeten einsetzen. Ich habe schon im Geheimen mit den Illuminati verhandelt und ihnen eine Generalamnestie angeboten, wenn sie ihre Macht ohne Blutvergießen abtreten.“

Wir reden hier von einer vor 2012 Zeit, die in einigen Bereichen wirklich besonders war. Viele Träume einer besseren Welt zeichneten sich am Horizont ab, diverse Channelings waren involviert in den sogenannten “NESARA Traum” und ja, man wollte glauben. Man wollte glauben, dass es tatsächlich eine Geheimgesellschaft gab, die sich “dem Guten” verschrieben hätte. Viele von uns hofften, es möge wahr sein, dass Ende 2012 “der Aufstieg” käme und uns ruck zuck in eine bessere Welt katapultieren würde. Und so ist es vermutlich nicht sehr verwunderlich, wenn damals diese Behauptungen als ein Zeichen dafür angesehen wurde, dass es tatsächlich irgendwie aufwärts ginge und die Dinge sich zum besseren wenden.

Ich schrieb zwar schon 2008 einen Beitrag indem ich dafür plädierte “wieder runterzukommen”, aber insgeheim, ja, klammheimlich hoffte ich auch. Ja, ich weiß, hoffnungslos naiv, aber diese Form von Aufbruchsstimmung war schon etwas besonderes. Das hat dich irgendwie infiziert. Irgendwann redeten alle von einer 5. Dimension, keine Ahnung, wer damit angefangen hat, aber nicht grade viele Leute haben sich tatsächlich Gedanken darüber gemacht, wie so etwas REAL funktionieren sollte. Sonst wäre man vermutlich zur Einsicht gelangt, daß man es keinesfalls verantworten könnte, eine solche ad hoc Verschiebung überhaupt in Erwägung zu ziehen. 

Ich meine, man stelle sich vor, ein dichtes 3 D Bewusstsein, vollgestopft mit diversen Glaubensmustern, emotionalem Ballast und energetischen Ungleichgewichten, würde man ad hoc nach 5 D übersiedeln? Es würde einfach BOOOM machen, kein Mensch würde das überleben. Aber soweit hat damals kaum jemand gedacht. Oder das vor der Zahl 5 erst einmal die 4 kommt. Die Erwartungshaltung hat viele bizarre Dinge glaubwürdig erscheinen lassen, und nicht zuletzt, spendeten diverse Channelings den Menschen Trost, in einer Welt, derer sie langsam überdrüssig wurden.  

Nun ja, kommen wir wieder zu Fulford zurück. Die Chinesen ließen also über Fulford angeblich ausrichten, dass seit Jahren “weiße Ninja”, in der näheren Umgebung von Mitgliedern der geheimen US Regierung in den USA (Rothschild, Rockefeller und Co) eingedrungen seien. Diese würden nur mehr auf “das GO” warten, und innerhalb von Stunden würden alle Illuminati sofort “entsorgt” sein. Hurra.

“Es gibt eine Einheit von 3.000 Ninja-Attentätern. Diese Ninjas gehören zu einem 2.000 Jahre alten Martial-Arts-Kult. Ihre Spezialität besteht darin, sich in befestigte Anlagen zu schleichen und bedeutende Persönlichkeiten umzubringen. Hinzu kommt, dass es sich bei diesen Ninjas um keine Asiaten handelt – sie sind Weiße und arbeiten bei den Spezialeinheiten der USA. Sie wurden von den Japanern ausgebildet. Sie kennen den wahren Hintergrund der Macht in den Vereinigten Staaten und stehen bereit, zum entscheidenden Zeitpunkt zu handeln.”

Innerhalb kürzester Zeit wären alle Illuminati und ihre Familien ausgelöscht. Laut Fulford hätten die Illuminati dann das Ultimatum Ernst genommen und seien zur Zusammenarbeit bereit. Schon bald, sagte Fulford, werden wir eine neue, bessere Welt sehen. Tja, da warten wir noch heute darauf ..  

Da haben wir also eine mysteriöse chinesische Geheimgesellschaft, die aus Gründen des “größeren Guten” nicht vor Mord zurückschreckt. Schön, nicht wahr, wenn die Welt so einfach sein kann? Eine sogenannte “White Dragon Society”, eine Vereinigung von Triaden und Yakuza, die ihr Geld mit Drogen, Glücksspiel, Prostitution und weiß der Himmel noch alles, was irgendwie Geld bringt macht, schreiten zur “Rettung der Welt”? Wie bizarr ist DAS denn? 

Tatsächlich hatte das Interview mit Rockefeller nichts davon zum Inhalt. Interessant ist es auch, wie es dazu gekommen ist. 

Henry Makow: „Gehe ich daher richtig in der Annahme, dass sie David Rockefeller nicht als Vertreter der Roten und Grünen [Geheimgesellschaft] begegnet sind, und dass er daher nichts von ihrer ‚Einladung’ wusste?

Fulford: „Das Treffen hatte zwei Funktionen: Einerseits wollte ich innerhalb der Matrix sein öffentliches Gesicht und seine öffentlichen Ansichten auf Band festhalten. Zweitens wollte ich persönlich überprüfen, ob die Fulfords und die Rockefellers seit über einem Jahrhundert durch den Geist von G.T. Fulford miteinander verquickt sind.”

“Innerhalb der Matrix” – pff, eins muss man Fulford lassen, er weiß genau was seine Pappenheimer hören wollen. 

Dieser G.T. Fulford war der Urgroßvater des jetzigen Benjamin Fulford, 1905 war George Taylor Fulford ein ziemlich reicher und angesehener Mann, einer der Reichsten seiner Zeit. Er war die frühe Version eines Pharmaindustriellen und also im selben Business wie die Rockefeller Familie beheimatet. Klar, und wie sie miteinander verquickt waren. Der Vater von Ben Fulford, Dwight Fulford, war in den späten 1980ern kanadischer Botschafter in Saudi-Arabien. Fulford behauptet,  die Rockefellers hätten seinen Urgroßvater umgebracht, überreicht ihm aber angeblich drei Briefe, die ihm sein TOTER Urgroßvater für Rockefeller diktiert hätte. Aus einer E_Mail, die Ben Fulford an Jeff Rense, den Betreiber der bekannten, amerikanischen Website rense.com sandte:

“Jeff, es gibt Vieles, was ich nicht sagen darf. Ich traf David Rockefeller kurz vor dessen Vorladung zum Kaiser. Es scheint, dass G.T. Fulford ein gottestreuer und aufrichtiger Geist ist. Ich konnte ihn [Rockefeller] nur deshalb treffen, weil ich ihm einen Brief von G.T. hatte zukommen lassen. Ich glaube, dass die Matrix kurz vor ihrem Zusammenbruch steht und die Welt viel, viel besser werden wird.”

Wer mag, diese 3 Briefe sind in einem PDF des Nexus Magazins, ab Seite 70 durchzulesen. Zusammenfassend möchte ich sagen – was da zu lesen ist, einfach haarsträubend! Behalten wir einfach im Hinterkopf, dass Rockefeller und Fulford familiäre Gemeinsamkeiten haben, ihre Väter kannten sich. Aber okay, was soll’s. Das ist beileibe nicht das schrägste, aus dem Fulford Phantasieuniversum. 

Im Laufe der weiteren Jahre schreibt Fulford diverse Artikel auf seinem Gebührenpflichtigen Blog. Dummerweise wollen die blöden Illuminati einfach nicht aufgeben und so überbringt er ein Ultimatum nach dem anderen. Woche für Woche, Jahr für Jahr – doch Fulford ist auch im Jahre 2015 unerschütterlich: “Wir werden die Kabale besiegen!” Ich meine, wo sind sie hin, all die gefährlichen Ninjas? Nun muss es eine Massenverhaftung der Kabale tun – die seit etwa 2008 – 2009 angekündigt wurde, und deren Voraussage bis jetzt einfach weitergeführt wird. “Que sera, sera, whatever will be, will be ..”

Er mixt das alles so geschickt, als wenn man eine Geschichte über James Bond, gepaart mit “Jack Reacher” (der Held in den Büchern Lee Childs) schreiben würde, gespickt mit “X Files”, den “Fantastischen Vier”, die vereint mit der “Galaktischen Föderation” kämpft, mit etwas Geheimgesellschaften und Bankwesen gewürzt, dazu kommen noch etwas realpolitische Vorkommnisse, die ins eigene Gedankengebäude zurechtgebogen werden, bedrohliches, aber diffuses Dunkel, Killeragenten – und oh, vergessen wir nicht den tollen “Wohlstandsfonds” über 12 Billionen Dollar (1000 Billionen Yen) , den “die japanische Regierung grundsätzlich bereit ist einzurichten, um Armut und Umweltzerstörung zu beenden und ehedem verbotene Technologien in verantwortungsbewusster Weise auf dem Markt zu bringen.” 

Fulford Update aus April 2012: “Die große Frage ist nun, wie man einen Mechanismus aufsetzt, der die Verteilung der 1000 Billionen Yen auf die Staaten der Welt bewerkstelligen kann. Was in der Angelegenheit mit Sicherheit schon entschieden ist: Es darf kein zentralisiertes und geheimgehaltenes System in privaten Händen sein. Prinzipiell existiert auch schon eine Vereinbarung, dass die japanische Regierung 500 Billionen Yen verwaltet und die neue Internationale Wirtschaftsplanungsbehörde die anderen 500 Billionen Yen.”

Kurz gesagt, alles viel zu gut, um wahr zu sein. Aus der grundsätzlichen Bereitschaft scheint ein “weißes Rauschen” geworden zu sein, dessen Quelle allein im Fulford Troll Universum aufzutauchen scheint, aber der realen Welt niemals begegnet ist. Was für eine Überraschung! Oder man höre sich diesen Schmarrn, aus dem 6. Januar, im Jahre 2015 an:

“Es ist nun klar, dass der international gehandelte US Dollar durch Gold gedeckt wird. Der Beweis hierfür ist die Tatsache, das sich der Dollar gegenüber einem Korb anderen Währungen in der Weise geändert hat, der dem folgt, wie sich Gold gegenüber diesen Währungen verhält. Der international gehandelte Gold gedeckte Dollar und der chinesische Yuan befinden sich beide nun unter der Kontrolle der Dragon-Familie (asiatische Königshäuser), der britischen Königsfamilie, der chinesischen kommunistischen Regierung und der schweizerischen Bankenfamilie mit ihren Verbündeten.

Allerdings hören wir von ihnen, dass Elemente der US Firmenregierung weiterhin Widerstand leistet, in dem sie Derivate einsetzen, um ungedeckte Dollars zu erschaffen, damit sie die Börse aufkaufen können. Am 31. Dezember ist es ihnen auch gelungen, illusorische $100 Milliarden auf ihr Konto zu bringen, um ihren Bankrott zu verschieben.”

Bitte, wie weit von der Realität kann man sich eigentlich entfernen, ohne das es jemanden wirklich auffällt? Wie wir noch sehen werden, ziemlich weit. 

David Wilcock, Drake Bailey, Neil Keenan, Benjamin Fulford, Cobra – in the dreamworld of internet fantasy

Aus der mysteriösen chinesischen Geheimgesellschaft wurde irgendwann die “White Dragon Society”, die zwar auch keiner kennt, aber es existiert ein Gesicht dazu – Neil Keenan, ein in Bulgarien lebender US-Staatsbürger und angeblich ein Bevollmächtigter jener “White Dragon Society”. Dieser Typ wiederum wird “verifiziert” und legitimiert durch David Wilcock. Der 1951 geborene Neil Keenan wurde 1983 vom Staat Florida wegen Kokainhandel, der Übergabe von kontrollierten Substanzen und Kokain-Besitz, mit der Absicht zum Verkauf oder Kauf verurteilt. 

Neil Keenan verkauft den Leuten die Geschichte, dass er mit der Hilfe der chinesischen Drachen Familie, an der Rückholung einer Unmenge von Gold arbeitet, welches von den Illuminati gestohlen wurde. Dieses viele Gold wäre für Humanitäre Projekte reserviert gewesen, um der Welt zu helfen, damit sie die gegen die Neue Weltordnung bestehen könnte und die Geld und Macht Überlegenheit der Illuminati Weltweit aufzulösen imstande wäre. Keenan erhebt Anspruch auf Gold der Federal Reserve Bank, im Wert von angeblichen 1,1 Billionen (amerik. Trillionen) US-Dollar. Und irgendeine hochkönigliche Familie aus Indonesien würde ihm dabei helfen. 

Herrje, mir kommen gleich die Tränen – hat mal irgendjemand ein Taschentuch für mich?   

Was mich zu OPPT bringt: Der “One People Public Trust” behauptet, dass die Elite, alle Banken und Nationen Zwangsvollstreckt wurden. OPPT ist involviert in die sogenannte “Souveränitäts Bewegung” und beansprucht einen universellen Fonds im Einverständnis der Menschen erschaffen zu haben. Es wird angepriesen, dass jeder Mensch 6 Millionen Dollar in Bar erhalten würde, welche sie – ah, da haben wir sie ja wieder –  von einer ungenannten „indonesischen Königsfamilie“, nach dem weltweiten Zusammenbruch und dem Ende der Kabale erhalten würde. JUH-HU!

Mal kurz klarstellen: Indonesien hat keine Könige, oder sonst welche Königsfamilien, die gab es nur bis etwa Mitte des 15. Jahrhunderts. Bis Anfang des 20. Jahrhunderts hatte es eine sehr wechselnde Geschichte, wobei die Portugiesen und Holländer, den heute als Indonesien bekannten Nationalstaat kolonialisierten, der aus einem Archipel von 17.508 Inseln existiert, von denen etwa 6.000 bewohnt sind. Als am 17. August 1945, Sukarno und Mohammad Hatta die Unabhängigkeit Indonesiens ausriefen, kam es in der Folge zu kämpfen, die letztlich am 27. Dezember 1949, in Amsterdam, in der offiziellen Übergabe der Souveränität von den Holländern an Sukarno mündeten. 

Der auf Lebenszeit gewählte Sukarno erklärte am 22. Februar 1967 seinen Rücktritt, als der von den USA protegierte Suharto, Oberbefehlshaber der Kostrad-Brigaden einen Militärputsch initiierte und von Präsident Sukarno die Vollmacht zur Regierungsbildung erzwang. Als Dank wurde Sukarno unter Hausarrest gestellt, den er bis zu seinem Tod 1970 erdulden musste. However, man gebe in die Suchmaschine “indonesische Königsfamilie” ein und staune über die magere Ausbeute. Der einzige, der wirklich jemals am Indonesischen Volk interessiert war, ist Sukarno gewesen. Dessen Vermögen (Gold und andere Werte) lagert nach wie vor in der Schweiz. Sie rücken es einfach nicht raus. 

Interessant ist auch, wie Neil Keenan über die OPPT Leute herzieht:

“OPPT kleidet sich selbst in eine exzentrische Mischung aus New Age Philosophie und sucht offensichtlich uns einen EINE WELT FONDS basierend auf Theologie, Kosmologie aufzubürden. Nenne es wie du willst, ohne Respekt für individuellen Glauben, Traditionen, Bräuche oder Vorlieben der diversen Religionen der Welt, die vermutlich zur Bedeutungslosigkeit verblassen wird bis hin zu einer segensreichen Feierlichkeit von TUN und SEIN … bis wir eines Tages aufwachen und uns in einer Rothschild- und Rockefeller-Welt wiederfinden, die eine globale Sklavenkarte herausgeben hat, anstatt Dollars, Pfund oder Peso.”

Die OPPT Leute auch nicht Mundfaul, schlugen ähnlich zurück:

“Also, die OPPT-Leute haben unter bestimmten Bedingungen zugestimmt, mit der Königsfamilie zusammenzuarbeiten um dabei zu helfen eine „Brückenfinanzierung“ einzurichten bevor die ganze Freie Energie-/Verdeckte Operationen-Technologie  groß ausgerollt wird; wir haben es fast geschafft. Aber die Bedingung war, dass das Finanzsystem zuerst zusammenbrechen muss. Die Kabalen haben immer noch die Möglichkeit, sich teilweise neu zu organisieren wenn es heute eine Freilassung von Vermögen für alle gäbe. 

Die indonesische Königsfamilie beginnt damit, sich „öffentlich“ von Keenan zu distanzieren (hinter den Kulissen sagen sie es laut) und sie haben wahrscheinlich alle ihre verbliebenen Verbindungen zu ihm abgebrochen. So viel wir sagen können, haben sie seine CIA/Bush Camp-Loyalität entdeckt, als auch mögliche Beziehungen zum Drogenhandel. Keenan muss sich jetzt auf eine Gruppe von sehr talentierten früheren Geheimagenten verlassen, die ihm zurzeit als PR-Mitarbeiter dienen (DB, JH, usw.) hier in den Staaten, die ihm Schutz anbieten während er überlegt, wie er seine Bemühungen wieder neu ausrichten kann.”

Na schön, dieser Bullshit muss nicht weiter kommentiert werden. Kommen wir nun zum nächsten Herrn der fantastischen Geschichten – Mr. David Wilcock.

Wilcock, der sich selbst als Reinkarnation von Edgar Cayce proklamiert, ist ein ziemlich bekannter Schriftsteller und beliebter Redner. Vor allem über die “bald bevorstehende Offenlegung der Alien Agenda”, er schrieb Bücher über “Die Urfeld Forschung”(Wissenschaftliche Fakten belegen alte Weisheitslehren) und “den Synchronizitätsschlüssel” (die geheime Architektur der Zeit, die unser aller Schicksal lenkt). Wilcock ist schwer involviert in die “Aufstiegsgeschichte” und in die alten Teachings von “The law of one”, er behauptet auch, ein RA Kanal zu sein und gab RA Channelings auf Youtube.  Man höre sich das bitte einmal an, also die Energie fühlt sich für mich eher wie Mickey Maus an. Aber gut, das mag meine Projektion sein ..

Wilcock hätte wirklich bei diesen Themen bleiben sollen, der Schaden ist nicht so groß, den er damit anrichten kann. Aber nein, es musste ja unbedingt ein “Dream Team” mit Fulford sein. 

Anfangs dachte ich noch, David Wilcock ist einfach ein Träumer, der sich von Fulford nur beschwatzen ließ. Aber je mehr man seine Posts und Interviews mit Drake und Fulford verfolgt, desto mehr wird klar – da steckt eindeutig mehr dahinter. Das ist nicht nur Mitläufer Gerede, er spricht ständig davon, mit diversen Whistleblowern Kontakt zu haben und kündigt einen Unsinn nach dem anderen an. Jeder kann an der Nase herumgeführt werden, das ist keine Schande. Aber wenn ich das nicht merke, wenn ich nach der 10. “Wundertütengeschichte” nicht schnalle, dass mir laufend Bären aufgebunden werden – dann sollte ich mir irgendein schwarzes Loch suchen und dort eine kleine Weile drüber meditieren. 

David Wilcocks Kommentar zu den neuesten Infos von Ben Fulford, Januar 2015:  

“Ben’s Informationen geben eine gute Zusammenfassung von dem, was auf der physischen Ebene abläuft. Im weiteren Umfeld von Gesellschaft und Umwelt um uns herum hat es entscheidende und erstaunliche Bewegungen gegeben. Niemand von der Kabale hat dies erwartet. Sogar mit den ihnen zur Verfügung stehenden technischen Mitteln, um in die Zukunft zu sehen, haben sie es nicht kommen sehen. 

Was wir gleichzeitig sehen ist, dass das ganze Sonnensystem abgesperrt worden ist. Alle werden unter Quarantäne gehalten. Niemand kann herein kommen, und niemand kann hinaus gelangen, auch keine Kommunikation ist möglich, weder herein noch hinaus. Das mag keine große Sache sein für eine hyperfortgeschrittene Zivilisation, aber es hat die Spielregeln geändert. 

Außerdem sind in den letzten drei Wochen praktisch alle offensiven Waffensysteme, eingeschlossen die hochgeheimen, ausgeschaltet oder zerstört worden. Dies schließt die strategischen Verteidigungswaffen mit ein – Atomsprengköpfe oder was auch immer. Diese Informationen kommen von verschiedenen, neuen Insiderquellen, die an die Oberfläche gekommen sind und die sich als höchst zuverlässig erwiesen haben. Die Kabale sieht die Situation offensichtlich als riesiges Schlamassel und als eine schreckliche Bedrohung. Es wäre unmöglich gewesen die Kabale zu entlarven und zu besiegen ohne dass diese Dinge geschehen wären, denn sie hätten versucht alle mit sich zu reißen. “

Schau an, der Mann spricht schon in der Vergangenheitsform – “die Kabale zu entlarven und zu besiegen “. Man muss sich wirklich wundern, wieso sein Engagement, in das “wir werden alle gerettet” Geschwätz, wenig Auswirkungen auf seine Popularität hat. Im Gegenteil, kürzlich trat er sogar gemeinsam mit Fulford im russischen Fernsehen auf. Überschrift der Sendung: “Die Kabale werden besiegt!” Also was jetzt? Isses schon passiert, oder wird’s noch passieren? Da kenn sich einer noch aus .. 

Drake Bailey

Einer der “Lieblingsinsider” von Wilcock ist ein Kerl namens DRAKE, mit richtigen Namen Drake Bailey, ein selbsterklärter “Pentagon Insider und amerikanischen Patriot”. Es begann irgendwann im Frühjahr 2012, als er “Drake” als einen “neuen Whistleblower” auf seiner Website Divine Cosmosvorstellte. 

Der Massenarrest HOAX

Wilcock O-Ton, 5. April 2012:

“This plan will be carried out by a 60-percent majority of heroes in the Pentagon and US military — who do NOT support Financial Tyranny, and genuinely have our best interests at heart. There are now signs that this majority has recently become a lot more than 60 percent. Drake just told me on the phone that he is now in direct contact with the underground on a mass level. He is now working with every significant group having to do with freedom. 

Former Asia-Pacific bureau chief Benjamin Fulford was the first to break this story, as far as I am aware. He has been talking about it for at least three years now. I became personally involved by interviewing Fulford several times now — and posting the transcripts, which have never ceased to be fascinating. In addition, I began directly working with some of his top contacts behind the 134-nation alliance of countries ready to end Financial Tyranny — as of last November.”

Am 4. Juli 2012 sollten sie alle hinter schwedische Gardinen wandern – oh, es ist nicht passiert? So ein Pech aber auch, ach so, es ist immer noch NICHT passiert, wird aber munter weiter propagiert? Also das ist, das ist – zumindest erstaunlich, ich meine, wenn ich einmal Unsinn rede, dann wird mir vermutlich verziehen. Sag ichs zweimal und ich fliege auf, dann krieg ich eine auf “den Deckel”. Werde ich zum dritten Mal damit erwischt, dann kann mich nirgends mehr blicken lassen. Das gilt offensichtlich nicht für Benny und seine launigen Freunde ..

Drake war in Vietnam und leidet am Posttraumatischen Stresssyndrom. Er behauptet, Mitglied einer mysteriösen  Gruppe zu sein, welche sich “Loyal Order of the Royal Dragon” nennt, die mit der “White Dragon Society” zusammenarbeitet. Ach, ist die Welt nicht klein? Mister Drake Bailey ist kein Unbekannter – bereits vor 2012 lief er eine NESARA Investment Kampagne. Seither sind seine Grundaussagen, dass der “militärische Untergrund”, die sogenannten “white hats”, die amerikanische Konstitution wieder herstellen würden, NESARA zum Sieg verhelfen und ein neues, globales Währungssystem einführen würden, zum Wohle aller Menschen. 

Was uns jetzt zu COBRA bringt:

Auch Cobra hat viel mit Drake zusammengearbeitet und sie machten gemeinsame Interviews und erzählten der gebannt lauschenden Gemeinde, wie schön die Welt doch in Kürze sei. Cobra behauptet von sich ein plejadischer Kontakt zu sein, mit den aufgestiegenen Meistern zusammenzuarbeiten und  hat offensichtlich diverse geistige Entitäten gefunden, die ihm das anscheinend glaubhaft vermitteln. Aber meiner Ansicht nach, dürften das eher die “Herrschaften von der anderen Seite” sein. Auch Cobra redet immer wieder, bis heute übrigens von NESARA und dass es spätestens “nach dem Event” kommen würde. 

Auszug aus einem Cobra Interview von September 2014:

“NESARA ist ein Teil des Plans nach dem Event. Nicht in der ursprünglichen, sondern in einer erweiterten Form. Der Plan ist nicht statisch. Er wird erweitert. Ursprünglich war NESARA nur für die Vereinigten Staaten bestimmt. Jedoch wird der Reset des Finanzsystems auf dem gesamten Planeten geschehen. Diese Situation wirkt sich auf die sehr unterschiedlichen Wirtschaftssysteme und verschiedenen Umgebungen aus und dies muss in Betracht gezogen werden. Ja, NESARA wird umgesetzt werden.”

Hier haben wir einen “roten Faden”: NESARA ist der eigentliche Ursprung aller übers Internet zirkulierender Ideen über diverse Wohlstandsprogramme, indonesische Goldgeschenke, oder andere versprochene Wohltaten, zum besten der ganzen Welt. Und da ich niemanden langweilen will, hier nur sehr kurz die Geschichte von NESARA – wovon vielleicht einiges noch nicht bekannt ist. Recherchiert man bis zum Ursprung zurück, dann fühlt man seine Zehennägel in besonders rüder Weise aufgerollt. 

NESARA auf einen Blick:

• Weltweit neue, durch Edelmetalle gedeckte Währungen 
• Neue Bankensysteme 
• Abschaffung der Lohn- und Einkommensteuer 
• Annullierung von privaten Bankschulden 
• Beendigung von Korruption in Staat und Wirtschaft 
• Stärkung der Grundrechte: Freiheit und Souveränität 
• Wohlstand für jeden Bürger 
• Ende aller Kriegshandlungen

Ihr erinnert euch vielleicht? Der Stern von NESARA ging auf mit den „White Knights“ und der „Dove of Oneness“, welche gegen „The Dark Agenda“ (Illuminaten & Co.) kämpften. 

Wer ist die „Dove of Oneness“?

Ihr Name war Shaini Goodwin, eine Absolventin der “Rhamta school of enlightenment” – sie selbst sagt über sich in ihrem Report vom 18.7.: „My first name is pronounced “Shay-nee” and I love my last Name which very much reflects WHO I am and have always been: Goodwin. I am a good person and I always strive to be successful, i.e., “win” in a good way. The first two words of the article this reporter showed me are my name of which I am very proud.“

“My-first-Name-is-pronounced-“Shay-nee”-and-I-love-my-last-Name-which-very-much-reflects-WHO-I-am” erzählte von einem geheimen Gesetz namens NESARA (National Economic Security and Reformation Act), welches die Vermögen aus dem OMEGA Trust und anderen „Wohlstandsprogrammen“ freigeben sollte und behauptete, der Kongress habe NESARA im Jahre 2000 geheim verabschiedet, man könne seine Existenz aber nicht bekannt geben, weil dies eine „Knebel-/Sperr-Anordnung“ (Gag Order) des U.S. Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) bei Todesstrafe verbiete. Ist doch klar, oder? 

Sobald NESARA verkündet sei würden sich die Bankgesetze ändern und die „Massenauslieferung (mass deliveries) aus über 60 „Wohlstandsprogrammen“, inklusive Omega begänne. Dies wäre dann der Beginn, wo wir in die – OBACHT – “5. Dimension” aufgestiegen wären. Eben, Wohlstand für alle. 

Wir unterhalten uns hier gerade über jene Frau, die sich – unter einigen anderem Unsinn, nicht zu schade dafür war zu behaupten, Bruce Springsteen – The Boss” himself – würde sie unterstützen. Tja, manche Dinge erregen – nennen wir es “etwas ungünstige Publicity”. Daraufhin zog sie sich hinter einer Nebelwand aus vielleichts, wenn, aber und in ihr Schneckenhaus, äh sorry, Wohnwagen zurück. Aber sie kläffte nochmal kurz:

“Ich dachte wirklich, Bruce Springsteen – Komponist und Sänger von” Born in the USA “- wäre bereit zu helfen, wenn er die Wahrheit kannte”, schrieb sie in einem veröffentlichten Bericht, am 11 Februar 2006. “Ein paar Monate später erfuhr ich, dass Bruce Wesen ‘desinformiert’ war, durch bestimmte hochrangige Pentagon Offiziere, die Bruce mit Lügen fütterten.”

Das diverse “Lichtkräfte und aufgestiegene Meister” mitmischten, belebte das Geschäft zusätzlich und nährte die Hoffnungen vieler Menschen. 

St. Germain: Special Message on NESARA (2003)

“Greetings Dear Ones,

 

Know this. To all beings of Light here in Service to implement the New Now Age for Humanity. In just a few of your earth days there will be an Announcement of the NESARA Omega Group, that I started and I and many other Ascended Masters and the Golden Galactic Federation have been holding for humanity’s correct time to begin to transform the old dark agendas of the dark ones whom have been in power for many millenniums of time. That day and this time is Now.“

Oder dieses hier, aus dem Jahre 2011, vom Ashtar Kommando, Föderation des Lichts

“Aber dieses Unmittelbare , dieser Millionen Tonnen Gold, und anderen wertvollen Metalle und Schätze Betreffende, ist in der Tat, eigentlich, „indirekt“ Teil der riesigen „planetarischen Treuhandschaft“ für die mein/euer Freund, der aufgestiegene Meister St. Germain, verantwortlich ist – und ist auch Teil dessen, was das neue, planetarische Wirtschaftssystem, bekannt unter N.E.S.A.R.A., ausmacht. 

Zuerst möchte ich euch darüber berichten, und bestätigen, was dieser Kanal und so viele andere von euch spürten, und spezielle Botschaften von uns „Galaktischen“ in den letzten Tagen erhielten, bezüglich des Schutzes von beiden, David & Ben, indem wir euch versichern, dass beide vor jeder Art von Bedrohung und Angriffen auf ihr Leben geschützt sind. 

Und ganz besonders David dafür, dass er den Mut hatte, diese sehr wichtigen und kritischen Dokumentationen zur Überprüfung und Beweisführung der Fakten, die Ben von seinen Kontakten und Quellen, die mit den „White Dragons“ und den „White Hats“ verbunden sind, erhielt, und an David in seinem früheren Interview übermittelte. Die „White Dragons“ und die „White Hats“ arbeiten natürlich mit uns, von der Galaktischen Föderation zusammen, da wir alle noch viel wichtigere Enthüllungen ansteuern, die nun der ganzen Welt bekannt gegeben und dokumentiert, sowie als geschichtliche Tatsache erfasst werden müssen, um weit verbreitetes Allgemeinwissen zu werden. 

So seid beruhigt, dass diese zwei mutigen Individuen, sowie all unsere vielen Millionen freiwilligen Helfern in irdischen Körpern immer bewacht und beschützt sind.”

Ach sieh an, Benni und David genießen “höchste Sternen Protektion” – jetzt wird natürlich “alles klar”. Puh – da bin ich jetzt aber so was von erleichtert. „Planetarische Treuhandschaft“ – so nen Blödsinn kannste dir eigentlich nicht ausdenken, geschweige denn verkaufen .. 

Man muss den Hintergrund dazu kennen, dass VOR dem Beginn des N.E.S.A.R.A. HOAX (da nützen auch die ganzen P.u.n.k.t.e. nix), ein betrügerisches Investmentgeschäft, namens OMEGA stand, welches ein gewisser Clyde Hood einst angeleiert hatte, der mit seiner Betrugsmasche Tausenden gutgläubigen Leuten, über unglaubliche 6 Jahre hin (1994-2000) rund 20 Mill. Dollar (die Dunkelziffer liegt vermutlich weit höher) ergaunerte. Nachdem Clyde Hood 2001 zugab, das OMEGA ein Riesenschwindel war, wurde er für 14 Jahre verknackt. Okay, soweit alles klar? 

Good bye OMEGA, hello NESARA (N.E.S.A.R.A.)

Shay-nee – I-love-my-last-name-which-very-much-reflects-WHO-I-am-and-have-always-been-Goodwin, übernahm in Folge diese Betrugsagenda, begann zu behaupten, daß Clyde Hoods Geständnis eine Lüge und OMEGA aber real sei. DAS war der Einstieg, seitdem schrieb sie Tonnen an Berichte, über ihren hehren “Kampf für das Gute” und brachte den “Dove-of-Oneness“-Newsletter heraus. Bereits 2004 hatte die “Newstribune” eine 8 teilige Artikelserie darüber gebracht und eine Menge Widersprüche dabei aufgedeckt. 

Aber Say-nee wäre nicht die “Taube der Einheit”, hätte sie sich nicht dagegen “zur Wehr” gesetzt, mit einem wilden, Elend langen Artikel auf Rense “geantwortet, wobei in der Hauptsache, der Reporter als CIA Agent “erkannt” wurde. Schön, wenn die Welt so einfach ist. 

Wie? Die Wirklichkeit gefällt dir nicht? Dann ÄNDERE sie doch, wie es dir gefällt!

Und “Shay-nee” änderte gleich ne ganze Menge davon .. 

Im Jahre 2010 starb die “Taube der Einheit” und ihre Spendeneingänge gingen laut ihren Angehörigen, in über 100.000 $. 

Das nun, im Jahre 2015 immer noch solcher Unsinn “Salonfähig” ist, ringt mir nicht mal mehr Sarkasmus ab. Im Juni 2010 brachte Abandanthope. net. sowas wie einen “Abschiedsbrief “des Webmasters von Nesara us. Unter dem Titel “Remembering the Dove of Oneness”- wurde die “Taube der Einheit” Say-nee als eine von ihrer Mission getriebene dargestellt und als eine Frau gewürdigt, die von ihrer Liebe für die Menschheit, die Tiere und allen guten Wesen auf diesem Planeten erfüllt war. 

Geschlossen wurde mit den interessanten Worten: 

“Alle Investoren können noch auf goldfornesara@verizon.net gehen für eine Chance, um in den ganz besonderen Trades, die von Shaini Goodwin eingerichtet wurden zu investieren. Diese liefern mehr als günstige Renditen. Alle Kontakte sind noch lebensfähig.„

Der Experte für Geldwesen G. Edward Griffin, uns allen besser bekannt als Autor von “Die Kreatur von Jekyll Island: Die US-Notenbank Federal Reserve”, hat den NESARA Unsinn mit wenigen Punkten auseinandergenommen und zu Kleinholz geraspelt:

1. Im Executive Summary heisst es unter Punkt eins, es würde unter NESARA Gutschriften des US Schatzamtes geben.
http://nesara.org/bill/executive_summary.htm
Dieses Vorgehen ist unter Artikel 1. Sektion 10 der US Verfassung verboten:
http://www.house.gov/Constitution/Constitution.html
Section. 10.
Clause 1: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
NESARA wäre demnach gegen die US Verfassung gerichtet.
2. Punkt Nummer 3, damit wird die Federal Reserve nicht abgeschafft sondern dem Schatzamt unterstellt. Das Problem bleibt damit erhalten!
3. Unter Punkt Nummer 5 bleibt der Offenmarktausschuss der US-Notenbank erhalten – damit wird Geld aus dem Nichts erschaffen! Das Problem des Geldsystems bleibt somit erhalten.
Fazit: Der gleiche Beschiss wie zuvor – es ist keine Lösung, das Problem wird nur verschoben! 

Gut, wenn man so einen Unsinn einmal glaubt, so was kann passieren. Es kann auch ein zweites Mal passieren, aber seit Jahren? Und es passiert NICHTS! Absolut gar nichts, was auch nur einen Hauch davon bestätigen würde, was das Fantasy Universum dieser Typen so fabriziert. Lassen wir es damit gut sein, ich denke, ich habe mir Zeit genommen und Mühe gegeben, einigermaßen rüberzubringen, was ich von dem ganzen halte. Vielleicht kann es für einige Menschen hilfreich sein, die bereits durch diese Ebenen durch sind und zumindest misstrauisch, bezüglich solcher Ideen sind. 

Abschließende Gedanken:

Worte, Worte, Worte – die wie eine neue Art von Designerdrogen wirken, welche die Erwartungshaltung der Menschen mit mysteriösen Begriffen, wie etwa “white hats”, “der militärische Untergrund”, weiße Ritter, globaler Wohlstandsfond, etc., etc., nährt und füttert. Wobei sich Neil Keenan, Fulford, Wilcock und Drake gegenseitig die Bälle zuwerfen, einander abwechselnd verifizieren und bestätigen. Jeder einzelne der Beteiligten hat weitere Eisen im Feuer, die geschmiedet und übers Internet gestreut werden.

Das sind Profis und scheinen sehr gut von der Gutgläubigkeit und Naivität anderer leben zu können. Sie vermengen Wahrheit und Nonsens sehr geschickt, sie haben Kenntnisse über finanzielle und politische Gegebenheiten und wissen über zirkulierende Informationen sehr gut Bescheid, die quer übers “little Babylon” (Internet) verstreut werden und welche Illuminatigerüchte die Runde machen.

Es ist alles derselbe Bullshit! Ich weiß nicht, welche Spin Doctors hier am Werk sind, aber die Typen sind wirklich gut. Es gibt einen gemeinsamen Nenner hier, er heisst, erzeuge Trennung, wo immer es dir möglich ist und halte die Menschen in Atem. Diese Leute sind im “bitte rettet mich, ich bin ein Opfer” Geschäft. Sie verkaufen dir lauwarme Geschichten, welche die unbewussten Wunden in den Menschen ansprechen und bieten eine sehr einfache “Lösung” an: “ES WIRD FÜR DICH GETAN!”

Wir wachsen als Kinder mit dem Glauben an den Weihnachtsmann und dem Osterhasen heran, glauben später an Kasperle, Pezi und das Krokodil oder die Muppets Show, werden dazu konditioniert Lehrern zu vertrauen, die selber wenig Plan haben und im weiteren Verlauf der Erdenerfahrung werden wir dazu geführt, den “Da-nach-richten” Medien zu glauben. Wenn wir aus dieser durchgespülten Matrix aufwachen und uns rausbewegen, kommt die nächsthöhere Ebene ins Spiel, die dich ablenkt, dich schläfrig und abhängig halten soll. Dann wird jenen, welche begreifen, dass die Realität größer als angenommen ist, gleich mehrere Karotten vor die Nase gehängt, um sie wieder in den alten Kreislauf von gut und böse einzufangen und man präsentiert ihnen weitere Ebenen von Feinden, gegen die es sich zu kämpfen lohnt.  

Es steht gar nicht zur Debatte, dass es “dark forces” gibt, die Illuminati und andere Kontrollebenen, die ganz sicher nicht daran interessiert sind, dass sich die Dinge auf Erden jemals ändern. Die sogenannte “Galaktische Föderation”, dürfte eher so etwas sein, wie die Idee der UNO es Anfangs gewesen ist. Ein Zusammenschluss vieler Kräfte, um verschiedene Interessensgruppen und Streitereien konstruktiv zu managen. Sie mögen auch in den Schutz der Erdatmosphäre involviert sein und andere Projekte, um die Einmischung zumindest zu reduzieren, die hier läuft (wobei ich sie, gelinde gesagt, für etwas inkompetent halte) aber sicherlich sind sie nicht dafür da, um die Menschen von etwas zu “befreien”. 

Oder es bestreitet auch niemand, dass es auch gute oder hilfreiche Channelings gibt, die Menschen ermuntern und konstruktiv anleiten können. Viele Channelings dienen auch als Trost und Pflege verwundeter Menschen. Das größte Problem bei Channelings ist allerdings, die fehlende Klarheit und Reinheit des jeweiligen Kanals und welche Glaubensmuster und unbewusste Wunden in ihnen sind, die sie nicht anschauen wollen. 

Speziell wenn Wochenende Seminare dir “channeln” beibringen wollen, obwohl die Personen, die da teilnahmen, keine Schattenarbeit gemacht haben, sollte man sich nicht wundern, wenn sich dann solche Entitäten melden, die einem jeden Blödsinn auftischen können – die jeweilige Person aber nicht die Erfahrung hat, um die Entität tatsächlich zu identifizieren, oder unfähig ist, die Energien zu unterscheiden. So etwas braucht eine Menge Erfahrung, die oft Jahre dauert, um es wirklich zu lernen. Ich verstehe natürlich, wenn man einfache Antworten auf komplexe Vorgänge bevorzugt, aber hilfreich ist es natürlich nicht. Vor allem ist es bitter für diejenigen, die echte Kontakte und echte Channelings empfangen, die werden nämlich alle in den gleichen Topf geworfen. 

Es geht wirklich nicht darum, wer hier aller Einfluss nimmt, obwohl es zu Wissen, oder davon zu hören, durchaus zum persönlichen Bewusstseinsprozess beitragen kann. Aber der Punkt ist – ALLES ist tatsächlich in dir! Diese unsere Welt ist ein Ausdruck des Gesamtsystems, das mit jedem einzelnen Menschen verbunden ist. Was wir im außen sehen und wahrnehmen können, hängt entweder persönlich, national und global mit uns allen zusammen. 

Du bist DEIN Universum, du hast die Freiheit darüber, aber auch die Verantwortung dafür. Freiheit allerdings muss erarbeitet werden und so schwierig oder herausfordernd die Dinge auf der Erde auch sind, WIR stehen an vorderster Front – keine Illuminati, keine negativen Aliens. Wir sind das Problem und wir sind die Lösung! Deswegen kann uns auch keine externe Kraft, Gruppe oder sonstige Pappenheimer, die Arbeit abnehmen. Die menschliche Erfahrung ist ein persönlicher, nationaler und globaler Prozess. Und die Hauptarbeit – ich weiß, man mag es nicht hören, besteht in der Schattenarbeit und der Konfrontation mit den inneren, psychischen, emotionalen und körperlichen Ungleichgewichten.  

Ich will gar keine wilden Vermutungen anstellen, wieso, weshalb, oder warum Cobra, Wilcock, Fulford, Drake und Co. in diese Geschichten involviert sind. Es reicht, wenn man sich bewusst macht, das Erwartungshaltungen bedient werden, wo immerzu vertröstet und Wartepositionen stimuliert werden. 

In der Zwischenzeit bleibt DEIN Leben nämlich stehen und du beginnst an allen Ecken Feinde zu sehen, während der “größte Feind” unsichtbar bleibt – deine unbewussten Wunden, die bis in die früheste Kindheit zurückreichen, wo Emotionen dein einziger Ausdruck war und du gezwungen wurdest, deine Realität als unsicher zu erleben, dich zusammenzuziehen und deinen wirklichen Ausdruck zu verleugnen. 

Diese unverarbeiteten Emotionen sind der Treibstoff, wodurch die Realität manipuliert werden kann, weil die Realität Teil deines Bewusstseins ist. Das Fulford oder Wilcock nun im russischen Fernsehen auftauchen und nach wie vor viele Anhänger haben, bedeutet nicht, sie wären auf der richtigen Spur – NO, they are not on the right track. Es demonstriert nur, und zwar sehr deutlich, wie stark die Erwartungshaltung in den Menschen wohnt und wie wenig starke und selber denkende Menschen im Vordergrund stehen. 

Es zeigt, dass wir die Idee nicht loslassen wollen, irgendjemand “da draußen” könne uns retten. Doch hier geht es nicht um Rettung, sondern um das menschliche Bewusstsein – und da hat halt auch jeder eine Stimme. Persönlich haben wir keinen Einfluss auf das Leben und die Erfahrungen anderer, wir können nur vor der eigenen “Haustüre kehren”. 

Dieses System lebt im wahrsten Sinne von unseren unbewussten, emotional unverdauten Wunden und es haut ständig darauf ein. Wenn wir uns also einreden lassen, “die da Oben sind die Bösen, ich habe damit gar nichts zu tun”, dann täuschen wir uns alle sehr. Aber das ist es halt, wo wir derzeit sind – aber je mehr Menschen in ihre Kraft kommen, desto mehr reduziert sich Negativität und Manipulation. Aber ich hab nicht die Illusion, dass dies in absehbarer Zeit erledigt wäre. Wir stehen im Grunde erst am Anfang, was diese Prozesse auf persönlicher, nationaler oder globaler Ebene anlangt. Natürlich, dies ist nur meine persönliche Sichtweise, und ich würde mich wirklich sehr gerne eines besseren belehren lassen.

Trägheit und Unwahrheit sind die Hauptprobleme, sich selbst und anderen gegenüber. Sich selbst wirklich kennenlernen, seine Motive hinterfragen und dann an sich zu arbeiten, das wollen die wenigsten Menschen. Wir wollen nicht das eigene Unbehagen fühlen und so verlegen wir uns darauf, es irgendwie zu übertünchen. Manipulation und Kontrolle beginnt im kleinen, in der direkten Mensch zu Mensch Kommunikation. Der Mensch ist tatsächlich das “Maß aller Dinge”, alles beginnt und endet mit ihm. 

Update 2017: Fulford lässt seinen Dünnpfiff weiterhin ab.

„US-Präsident Donald Trump hat das Wochenende in Camp David mit seinen Spitzengenerälen verbracht, um die genaue Strategie auszuarbeiten, um die khazarische Mafia weltweit zu enthaupten, sagen Pentagon-Quellen.“

Dream on Benny ..

 

Until next time same station ..

Quellennachweise: 

http://benjaminfulford.net/

http://www.nesara.us/

http://www.weltverschwoerung.de/freimaurer-illuminaten-andere-geheimbuende/8078-nesara-betrug-begruendungen.html

http://www.thenewstribune.com/2006/06/18/366329/some-lucrative-new-age-hooey.html

http://abundanthope.net/pages/Candace_7/Remembering-the-Dove-of-Oneness.shtml

http://www.nexus-magazin.de/files/gratis/Fulford-Dossier.pdf

https://stevenblack.wordpress.com/2008/07/14/runterkommen/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Taylor_Fulford

http://82391.forumromanum.com/member/forum/entry.user_82391.2.1113765405.japan_stimmt_formal_billionen_yen_fond_zu%E2%80%A6_fulford_update-verkuender_des_lichts.html

http://bm-ersatz.jimdo.com/startseite/archiv/fulford-archiv-u/

http://bm-ersatz.jimdo.com/startseite/archiv/fulford-archiv-u/

http://billasataylor.com/2014/09/07/who-is-neil-keenan/

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geschichte_Indonesiens

http://www.heute.at/news/oesterreich/art23655,860626

http://arcadiansblog.net/2013/05/19/neil-keenan-update-entlarvung-von-globalem-kontenbetrug-oppt-sind-die-kabel-in-tarnung/

http://revealthetruth.net/2013/04/12/arbeitet-oppt-mit-der-indonesischen-konigsfamilie-ist-neil-keenan-raus/

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?44252-Who-is-DRAKE-The-Loyal-Order-of-the-Royal-Dragon

http://zeit-zum-aufwachen.blogspot.co.at/2015/02/die-kabale-werden-besiegt-ben-fulford.html

http://transinformation.net/die-wahre-matrix-story-basierend-auf-cobras-updates/

http://nesara.insights2.org/GermainQuestions.html

http://www.oom2.com/t230-tons-tons-of-gold-n-e-s-a-r-a-and-our-gfl-cosmic-sting-operation-channeled-through-michael-ellegion

https://stevenblack.wordpress.com/2014/08/09/worauf-warten-wir/

_______________________________________________________

@ Steven Black

http://archive.is/oarMj

Alle Artikel auf meiner Website dürfen bei Nennung des Autors und Linksetzung der Website, gerne und jederzeit kopiert und weiterverteilt werden. Ausgenommen davon sind Gewerbliche Interessen, wie etwa einen dieser Artikel in diversen Medienpublikationen zu veröffentlichen, dies bedarf der Genehmigung des Autors.