The Worldwide Network of us Military Bases

https://vids.theoven.lol/videoEmbed/1448/standing-army.-die-geheime-strategie-der-us-militärbasen?channelName=Anonymous

Great post filled with extremely valuable information!

“This article has focussed on the Worldwide development of US military power. The US tends to view the Earth surface as a vast territory to conquer, occupy and exploit. The fact that the US Military splits the World up into geographic command units vividly illustrates this underlying geopolitical reality. Humanity is being controlled and enslaved by this Network of US military bases.”

How can we really stop such a huge display of military force? Are pacific organisations & movements enough? All these figures are bone chilling! Not mentionning elements not in the public domaine..!!

For those who don’t believe in the global government agenda, this is an irrefutable proof to me.

The Worldwide Network of US Military Bases when being ANTI means being FOR human rights, coexistence and peace

The Worldwide control of humanity’s economic, social and political activities is under the helm of US corporate and military power. Underlying this process are various schemes of direct and indirect military intervention. These US sponsored strategies ultimately consist in a process of global subordination. Where is the Threat?
The 2000 Global Report published in 1980 had outlined “the State of the World” by focusing on so-called “level of threats” which might negatively influence or undermine US interests.
Twenty years later, US strategists, in an attempt to justify their military interventions in different parts of the World, have conceptualized the greatest fraud in US history, namely “the Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT). The latter, using a fabricated pretext constitutes a global war against all those who oppose US hegemony. A modern form of slavery, instrumented through militarization and the “free market” has unfolded.
Major elements of the conquest and world domination strategy by the US refer to:
1) the control of the world economy and its financial markets,
2) the taking over of all natural resources (primary resources and nonrenewable sources of energy). The latter constitute the cornerstone of US power through the activities of its multinational corporations.
Geopolitical Outreach: Network of Military Bases
The US has established its control over 191 governments which are members of the United Nations. The conquest, occupation and/or otherwise supervision of these various regions of the World is supported by an integrated network of military bases and installations which covers the entire Planet (Continents, Oceans and Outer Space). All this pertains to the workings of an extensive Empire, the exact dimensions of which are not always easy to ascertain.
Known and documented from information in the public domaine including Annual Reports of the US Congress, we have a fairly good understanding of the structure of US military expenditure, the network of US military bases and the shape of this US military-strategic configuration in different regions of the World.
The objective of this article is to build a summary profile of the World network of military bases, which are under the jurisdiction and/or control of the US. The spatial distribution of these military bases will be examined together with an analysis of the multibillion dollar annual cost of their activities.
In a second section of this article, Worldwide popular resistance movements directed against US military bases and their various projects will be outlined. In a further article we plan to analyze the military networks of other major nuclear superpowers including the United Kingdom, France and Russia.
II. More than 1000 US Bases and/or Military Installations
The main sources of information on these military installations (e.g. C. Johnson, the NATO Watch Committee, the International Network for the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases) reveal that the US operates and/or controls between 700 and 800 military bases Worldwide.
In this regard, Hugh d’Andrade and Bob Wing’s 2002 Map 1 entitled “U.S. Military Troops and Bases around the World, The Cost of ‘Permanent War’”, confirms the presence of US military personnel in 156 countries.
The US Military has bases in 63 countries. Brand new military bases have been built since September 11, 2001 in seven countries.
In total, there are 255,065 US military personnel deployed Worldwide.
These facilities include a total of 845,441 different buildings and equipments. The underlying land surface is of the order of 30 million acres. According to Gelman, who examined 2005 official Pentagon data, the US is thought to own a total of 737 bases in foreign lands. Adding to the bases inside U.S. Territory, the total land area occupied by US military bases domestically within the US and internationally is of the order of 2,202,735 hectares, which makes the Pentagon one of the largest landowners worldwide (Gelman, J., 2007).
Map 1. U.S. Military Troops and Bases around the World. The Cost of «Permanent War» and Some Comparative Data

Map 2. The American Military Bases Around the World (2001-2003)

Based on a selective examination of military bases in North America, Latin America, Western Europe, the Middle East, Central Asia, Indonesia, the Philippines and Japan, several of these military bases are being used for intelligence purposes. New selected sites are Spy Bases and Satellite-related Spy Bases.
The Surface of the Earth is Structured as a Wide Battlefield
These military bases and installations of various kinds are distributed according to a Command structure divided up into five spatial units and four unified Combatant Commands (Map 4). Each unit is under the Command of a General.
The Earth surface is being conceived as a wide battlefield which can be patrolled or steadfastly supervised from the Bases.

NATO Military Bases
The Atlantic Alliance (NATO) has its own Network of military bases, thirty in total. The latter are primarily located in Western Europe:
Whiteman, U.S.A., Fairford,
Lakenheath and Mildenhall in United Kingdom,
Eindhoven in Netherlands,
Brüggen, Geilenkirchen, Landsberg, Ramstein, Spangdahlem, Rhein-Main in Germany,
Istres and Avord in France.
Morón de la Frontera and Rota in Spain,
Brescia, Vicenza, Piacenza, Aviano, Istrana, Trapani, Ancora, Pratica di Mare, Amendola, Sigonella, Gioia dell Colle, Grazzanise and Brindisi in Italy,
Tirana in Albania,
Incirlik in Turkey,
Eskan Village in Soudi Arabia and
Ali al Salem in Kuwait

III. The Global Deployment of US Military Personnel
There are 6000 military bases and/ or military warehouses located in the U.S. (See Wikipedia, February 2007).
Total Military Personnel is of the order of 1,4 million of which 1,168,195 are in the U.S and US overseas territories.
Taking figures from the same source, there are 325,000 US military personnel in foreign countries:

1. – 800 in Africa,
– 97,000 in Asia (excluding the Middle East and Central Asia),
– 40,258 in South Korea,
– 40,045 in Japan,
– 491 at the Diego Garcia Base in the Indian Ocean,
– 100 in the Philippines, 196 in Singapore,
– 113 in Thailand,
– 200 in Australia,
and 16,601 Afloat.

In Europe, there are 116,000 US military personnel including 75,603 who are stationed in Germany.
In Central Asia about 1,000 are stationed at the Ganci (Manas) Air Base in Kyrgyzstan and 38 are located at Kritsanisi, in Georgia, with a mission to train Georgian soldiers.
In the Middle East (excluding the Iraq war theater) there are 6,000 US military personnel, 3,432 of whom are in Qatar and 1,496 in Bahrain.
In the Western Hemisphere, excluding the U.S. And US territories, there are 700 military personnel in Guantanamo, 413 in Honduras and 147 in Canada.
Map 3 provides information regarding military personnel on duty, based on a regional categorization (broad regions of the world). The total number of military personnel at home in the U.S. And/or in US Territories is 1,139,034. There are 1,825 in Europe 114, 660, 682 in Sub Saharian Africa, 4, 274 in the Middle East and Southern Asia, 143 in the Ex-USSR, and 89,846 in the Pacific.
IV. The Operational Cost of the Worldwide Military Network
US defense spending (excluding the costs of the Iraq war) have increased from 404 in 2001 to 626 billion dollars in 2007 according to data from the Washington based Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. US defense spending is expected to reach 640 billion dollars in 2008.
Center for Arms control
These 2006 expenses correspond to 3.7% of the US GDP and $935.64 per capita
Figure 1. U.S. Military Expenditures since 1998

Source : Global Issues
According to Fig 1, the 396 billion dollars military budget proposed in 2003 has in fact reached 417.4 billion dollars, a 73% increase compared to 2000 (289 billion dollars). This outlay for 2003 was more than half of the total of the US discretionary budget.
Since 2003, these military expenditures have to be added to those of the Iraq war and occupation The latter reached in March 2007, according to the National Priorities Project
, a cumulative total of 413 billion dollars.
US defense budget will equal ROW combined “within 12 months
Estimates of the Defense Department budget needs, made public in 2006 in the DoD Green Book for FY 2007 are of the order of 440 billion dollars.
Military and other staff required numbered 1,332,300. But those figures do not include the money required for the “Global World on Terrorism” (GWOT). In other words, these figures largely pertain to the regular Defense budget.
A Goldstein of the Washington Post, within the framework of an article on the aspects of the National 2007 budget titled «2007 Budget Favors Defense», wrote about this topic:
“Overall, the budget for the 2007 fiscal year would further reshape the government in the way the administration has been striving to during the past half-decade: building up military capacity and defenses against terrorist threats on U.S. Soil, while restraining expenditures for many domestic areas, from education programs to train service”
2007 Budget Favors Defense
V. US Military Bases to Protect Strategic Energy Resources
In the wake of 9/11, Washington initiated its “Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT), first in Afghanistan and then in Iraq. Other countries, which were not faithfully obeying Washington’s directives including Iran, North Korea, Syria and Venezuela have been earmarked for possible US military intervention.
Washington keeps a close eye on countries opposed to US corporate control over their resources. Washington also targets countries where there are popular resistance movements directed against US interests, particularly in South America. In this context, President Bush made a quick tour to Brazil, Uruguay, Colombia, Guatemala and Mexico «to promote democracy and trade» but also with a view to ultimately curbing and restraining popular dissent to the US interests in the region. .
VOA
The same broad approach is being applied in Central Asia. According to Iraklis Tsavdaridis, Secretary of the World Peace Council (WPC):
“The establishment of U.S. Military bases should not of course be seen simply in terms of direct military ends. They are always used to promote the economic and political objectives of U.S. Capitalism. For example, U.S. Corporations and the U.S. Government have been eager for some time to build a secure corridor for US.-controlled oil and natural gas pipelines from the Caspian Sea in Central Asia through Afghanistan and Pakistan to the Arabian Sea. This region -has more than 6 percent of the world’s proven oil reserves and almost 40 percent of its gas reserves. The war in Afghanistan and the creation of U.S. Military Bases in Central Asia are viewed as a key opportunity to make such pipelines a reality.”
Stop USA
The US. Are at War in Afghanistan and Iraq. They pursue these military operations until they reach their objective which they call “VICTORY”. According to Wikipedia, American troops fighting in these countries number 190,000. The “Enduring Freedom” Operation in Iraq alone has almost 200,000 military personnel, including 26,000 from other countries participating to the US sponsored “Mission”. About 20,000 more could join other contingents in the next few months. In Afghanistan, a total of 25,000 soldiers participate to the operation (Map 6 and Map 7).
Map 6. Petroleum and International Theater of War in the Middle East and Central Asia

Map 7. American Bases Located in Central Asia

VI. Military Bases Used for the Control of Strategic Renewable Resources
US Military Bases in foreign countries, are mainly located in Western Europe: 26 of them are in Germany, 8, in Great Britain, and 8 in Italy. There are nine military installations in Japan (Wikepedia).
In the last few years, in the context of the GWOT, the US haa built 14 new bases in and around the Persian Gulf.
It is also involved in construction and/or or reinforcement of 20 bases (106 structured units as a whole) in Iraq, with costs of the order of 1.1 billion dollars in that country alone (Varea, 2007) and the use of about ten bases in Central Asia.
The US has also undertaken continued negotiations with several countries to install, buy, enlarge or rent an addional number of military bases. The latter pertain inter alia to installations in Morocco, Algeria, Mali, Ghana, Brazil and Australia (See Nicholson, B., 2007), Poland, Czech Republic (Traynor, I., 2007), Ouzbekistan, Tadjikistan, Kirghizstan, Italy (Jucca, L., 2007) and France.
Washington has signed an agreement to build a military base in Djibouti (Manfredi, E., 2007). All these initiatives are a part of an overall plan to install a series of military bases geographically located in a West-East corridor extending from Colombia in South America, to North Africa, the Near East, Central Asia and as far as the Philippines (Johnson, C., 2004). The US bases in South American are related to the control and access to the extensive natural biological , mineral and water resources resources of the Amazon Basin. (Delgado Jara, D., 2006 and Maps 9 and 10).

VII. Resistance Movements
The network of US military bases is strategic, located in prcximity of traditional strategic resources including nonrenewable sources of energy. This military presence has brought about political opposition and resistance from progressive movements and antiwar activists.
Demonstrations directed against US military presence has developed in Spain, Ecuador, Italy, Paraguay, Uzbekistan, Bulgaria and in many other countries. Moreover, other long-termer resistance movements directed against US military presence have continued in South Korea, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Philippines, Cuba, Europe, Japan and other locations.
The Worldwide resistance to US foreign military bases has grown during the last few years. We are dealing with an International Network for the Abolition of US Military Bases.
Such networks’ objective is to broadly pursue disarmament, demilitarization processes Worldwide as well as dismantle US military bases in foreign countries.
The NO BASES Network organizes educational campaigns to sensitize public opinion. It also works to rehabilitate abandoned military sites, as in the case of Western Europe.
These campaigns, until 2004, had a local and national impact.
The network is now in a position to reach people Worldwide. The network itself underscores that “much can be gained from greater and deeper linkages among local and national campaigns and movements across the globe. Local groups around the world can learn and benefit from sharing information, experiences, and strategies with each other”
“The realisation that one is not alone in the struggle against foreign bases is profoundly empowering and motivating. Globally coordinated actions and campaigns can highlight the reach and scale of the resistance to foreign military presence around the world. With the trend of rising miniaturization and resort to the use of force around the world, there is now an urgent and compelling need to establish and strengthen an international network of campaigners, organisations, and movements working with a special and strategic focus on foreign military presence and ultimately, working towards a lasting and just system of peace»
No bases!
The Afghanistan and Iraq wars have, in this regard, created a favourable momentum, which has contributed to the reinforcement of the movement to close down US military bases in foreign countries:
“At the time of an International anti-war meeting held in Jakarta in May 2003, a few weeks after the start of the Iraq invasion, a global anti-military Bases campaign has been proposed as an action to priorize among global anti-war, justice and solidarity movements» (No bases).
Since then, the campaign has acquired greater recognition. E-mail lists have been compiled nousbases@lists.riseup.net and nousbases-info@lists.riseup.net that permit the diffusion of the movement members experiences and information and discussion exchanges. That list now groups 300 people and organizations from 48 countries. A Web site permits also to adequately inform all Network members. Many rubrics provide highly valuable information on ongoing activities around the World.
In addition, the Network is more and more active and participates in different activities. At the World Social Forums it organized various conferences and colloquia. It was present at the European Social Forum held in Paris in 2003 and in London in 2004 as well as at the the America’s Social Forum in Ecuador in 2004, and at the Mediterranean Social Forum in Spain in 2005.
One of the major gatherings, which was held in Mumbai, India, in 2004, was within the framework of the World Social Forum. More than 125 participants from 34 countries defined the foundations of a coordinated global campaign.
Action priorities were identified, such as the determination of a global day of action aiming at underscoring major issues stemming from the existence of US military bases. The Network also held four discussion sessions at the Porto Alegre Social Forum in 2005. One of those pertained to the financing of the Network’s activities.
It is important to recall that the Network belongs to the Global Peace Movement. Justice and Peace organizations have become more sensitized on what was at stake regarding US military bases.
The Quito and Manta International Conference, Ecuador, March 2007
A Network World Conference for the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases was held at Quito and at Manta, Ecuador, from March 5 to 9 2007
The objective of the Conference was to underscore the political, social, environmental and economic impacts of US military bases, to make known the principles of the various Anti-Bases movements and to formally build the Network, its strategies, structure and Action Plans. The main objectives of the Conference were the following:

– Analyze the role of Foreign Military Bases and other features of military presence associated to the global dominance strategy and their impacts upon population and environment;
– Share experiences and reinforce the built solidarity resulting from the resistance battles against Foreign military Bases around the World;
– Reach a consensus on objectives mechanisms, on action plans, on coordination, on communication and on decision making of a Global Network for the abolition of all Foreign military Bases and of all other expressions of military presence; and
– Establish global action plans to fight and reinforce the resistance of local people and ensure that these actions are being coordinated at the international level.

Conclusion
This article has focussed on the Worldwide development of US military power. The US tends to view the Earth surface as a vast territory to conquer, occupy and exploit. The fact that the US Military splits the World up into geographic command units vividly illustrates this underlying geopolitical reality. Humanity is being controlled and enslaved by this Network of US military bases. .
The ongoing re-deployment of US troops and military bases has to be analyzed in a thorough manner if we wish to understand the nature of US interventionism in different regions of the World. This militarisation process is charactersied by armed aggression and warfare, as well as interventions called “cooperation agreements”. The latter reaffirmed America’s economic design design in the areas of trade and investment practices. Economic development is ensured through the miniaturization or the control of governments and organizations. Vast resources are thereby expended and wasted in order to allow such control to be effective, particuarly in regions which have a strategic potential in terms of wealth and resources and which are being used to consolidate the Empire’s structures and functions.
The setting up of the International Network for the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases turns out to be an extraordinary means to oppose the miniaturization process of the Planet. Such Network is indispensable and its growth depends on a commitment of all the People of the World. It will be extremely difficult to mobilize them, but the ties built up by the Network among its constituent resistance movements are a positive element, which is ultimately conducive to more cohesive and coordinated battle at the World level.
The Final Declaration of the Second International Conference against Foreign Military Bases which was held in Havana in November 2005 and was endorsed by delegates from 22 countries identifies most of the major issues, which confront mankind. This Declaration constitutes a major peace initative. It establishes international solidarity in the process of disarmament. .
(Conférence internationale contre les bases militaires étrangères
Déclaration finale ).

Ref: Global Research, byJules Dufour

Jules Dufour is President of the United Nations Association of Canada (UNA-C) – Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean branch and Research Associate at the Center for Research on Globalization (CRG). He is Emeritus Professor of Geography at the University of Quebec, Chicoutimi.
In 2007, Professor Jules Dufour became Chevalier de l’Ordre national du Québec, a distinction conferred by the Quebec government, for his contributions to World peace and human rights, his numerous scholarly writings and the work he accomplished in the context of national and international commissions on issues pertaining to regional development, human rights and the protection of the environment.
Translated from the French, first published on Global Research’s French language website: Mondialisation.ca
References
COMITÉ DE SURVEILLANCE OTAN. 2005. Las bases militares : un aspecto de la estrategia global de la OTAN. Intervencion del Comité Surveillance Otan en la Conferencia Internacional realizada en La Habana 7-11.11.2005. 9 pages.
DELGADO JARA, Diego. 2006. Bases de Manta, Plan Colombia y dominio de la Amazonia. Militarizacion de la Hegemonia de EE. UU. En América latina. 17 pages.
EQUIPO DE COMUNICACIÓN CONFERENCIA NO BASES. 2007. La gente del mundo no quiere bases militares extranjeras.
GELMAN, J. 2007. Terratenientes. Rebelion. 26 de Febrero de 2007, Rebelion. Terratenientes
Ghana to host US Military Base? February 26, 2006.
JOHNSON, C., America’s Empire of Bases. January 2004.
JOHNSON, C. America’s Empire of Bases. Janvier 2004 .
JOHNSON, C. 2005. The Sorrows of Empire. Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic. Henry Holt, April 2005, Paperback. 389 pages.
JOHNSON, C., 2007.. 737 U.S. Military Bases = Global Empire. February 19, 2007
JUCCA, L., 2007. Italians protest over U.S. Base expansion. Sat Feb 17, 2007.
MANFREDI, E. 2007. Djibouti : Hôtel Corne d’Afrique, grande base américaine. Le GRAND SOIR.info. Édition du 23 mars 2007.
NEW INTERNATIONALIST. 2004. The Bases of Resistance, December 2004, Issue 374.
NICHOLSON, B. 2007. Secret New Us Spy base to Get Green Light. February 15, 2 007.
TRAYNOR, I. 2007. US EXPANDS, Builds New Military Bases in Europe. The Guardian, anuary 22, 2007.
TSAVDARIDIS, I., 2005. Military Bases around the world and in Europe – the role of the USA and NATO. Novembre 2005. Stop USA / STOP United States of Agression.
VAREA, C., Las bases Militares de EEUU en Iraq. 4 mai 2006. Nodo50.
Web Sites
An Internet Guide to United States Military Bases Around the World :
American Military Bases Around the World
APPEL A UN RASSEMBLEMENT INTERNATIONAL en Mars 2007, Équateur, Pour l’abolition de toutes les bases militaires
Bases y Ejercicios Militares de EE.UU. El Comando Sur.
BUILDING A GLOBAL ANTI-MILITARY BASES MOVEMENT
Campana. Un mundo sin bases militares . Asemblea de Organizaciones y Movimientos contra la guerra, la OTAN y el Neoliberalismo (Madrid), Nodo50.
Challenges to the US Empire, Challenges to the US Empire – Empire? – Global Policy Forum.
Washington veut installer une base militaire en Algérie. Le Quotidien d’Oran, 20 juillet 2003.
Empire? Empire? – Global Policy Forum
International Conference against Foreign Military Bases. Final Declaration.
[Fsmed-general] for all that are against foreign military bases:
[Fsmed-general] for all that are against foreign military bases:en/sp/fr
FUENTES DE AGUA EN AMÉRICA LATINA :
Visiones Alternativas – Inicio
Abdulhafeth Khrisat, Impérialisme américain et politique militaire, , Université Mu’tah
Interview with Chalmers Johnson, Part 1. An Empire of More Than 725 Military Bases.
Liste des bases militaires américaines dans le monde.
Major Military Bases World-Wide,
Major Military Bases World-Wide
Military Bases Around The World, Bases Around the World
Military Bases around the world and in Europe – the role of the USA and NATO , Iraklis Tsavdaridis, Secretary of the World Peace Council (WPC) 8th November 2005, From the Greek Committee for International Detente and Peace (EEDYE), Presented on November 8, 2005 at the International Conference on Foreign Military Bases in Havana/Cuba organized by MOVPAZ :
Military Bases around the world and in Europe – the role of the USA and NATO
Military of the United States : Military of the United States – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
MOVIMIENTOS SOCIALES DE RESISTENCIA EN AMÉRICA LATINA
No a la instalacion de una base de la OTAN en Zaragoza :
No a la instalación de una base de la OTAN en Zaragoza | Ecologistas en Acción de Zaragoza
OTAN – Le grand jeu des bases militaires en terre européenne :
OTAN – Le grand jeu des bases militaires en terre européenne
Protestas contra bases militares de EEUU en Espana :
Protestas contra bases militares de EEUU en Espaa
RIQUEZA DE LA BIODIVERSIDAD EN AMÉRICA LATINA
US Military Troops and Bases Around the World :
US Military Troops and Bases Around the World- US Empire and Unilateralism – Global Policy Forum
U.S. Military Troops and Bases Around the World /united for peace & justice:
United for Peace & Justice:U.S. Military Troops and Bases Around the World
US Military Expansion and Intervention :
US Military Expansion and Intervention – Empire? – Global Policy Forum
YACIMIENTOS PETROLEROS EN AMÉRICA LATINA :
Visiones Alternativas – Inicio

LinkBacks (?)

This article was scrubbed from the regular web. I found it here: https://web.archive.org/web/20160329033332/http://www.assatashakur.org/forum/breaking-down-understanding-our-enemies/33113-worldwide-network-us-military-bases.html

Schweiz – Arzt von Polizei abgeholt und in Psychiatrie gebracht

Quelle

Sonntag, 12. April 2020 , von Freeman um 16:00

Genau das was in der Sowjetunion unter dem Kommunismus mit Oppositionellen passierte wird jetzt in der Schweiz vom Staat praktiziert. Dr. med. Thomas Binder, Kardiologie FMH aus Wettingen, hat die Polizei am Samstag abgeholt und in die Psychiatrie gebracht. Warum? Weil er sich gegen die Quarantänemassnahmen und die Begründung dafür als “Truther” äusserte. Die Schweizer Medien behaupten, weil er Drohungen gegen die Behörden ausgestossen hätte. In einem Tweet hat er geschrieben: “Vor meiner Praxis steht ein Einsatzkommando der KAPO Aargau, ich werde abgeholt, HILFE!!!!

Wie für einen Schwerverbrecher oder Terroristen sind Polizisten mit Schutzweste und Maschinenpistole in Vollmontur aufgekreuzt. Dabei sperrte die Polizei vorübergehend die angrenzende Strasse sowie den nahen Bahnhof ab.

Weil behauptet wurde, es bestehe der Verdacht, dass Dr. Thomas Binder mutmasslich psychisch labil und bewaffnet sein könnte, traf die Polizei rund um das Gebäude besondere Sicherheitsvorkehrungen. 

Dr. Binder wurde in eine psychiatrische Klinik eingewiesen. Die Ermittlungen nach den genauen Umständen der Drohungen sind angelaufen. Die Staatsanwaltschaft Baden hat eine Strafuntersuchung eröffnet.

Ja, das passiert heute mit Ärzten, die sich nicht der offiziellen staatlichen Linie betreffend Coronavirus unterwerfen und eine andere Meinung haben. Sie werden für verrückt erklärt und als Gefahr für die Gesellschaft weggesperrt.

Kollegen haben sich gemeldet:

Müsst ihr noch mehr Beweise haben, die Schweiz ist ganz schnell in eine Diktatur geraten? Kann überall mit kritischen Stimmen passieren.

Auch in Deutschland will man Quarantäne-Verweigerer in Psychiatrien einsperren. Sachsens Sozialministerin Petra Köpping (SPD) erklärte in einen Statement, im Einzelfall sei Zwang nötig, um Anordnungen durchzusetzen.

Behauptet später ja nicht, “ICH HABE VON NICHTS GEWUSST!!!”

Mir ist ähnliches 2009 passiert. Weil ich kritisch über die Massnahmen wegen der damaligen Schweinegrippe geschrieben habe, hat das Bundesamt für Gesundheit BAG in Bern mich als “gesundheits- gefährdend” bezeichnet. Ich sei eine Gefährdung für die Gesellschaft weil ich eine andere Meinung zur Impferei hatte.

Ich wurde damals vom Schweizer Fernsehen deshalb interviewt.

Stalin’s Jews

We mustn’t forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish

Sever Plocker|Published:  12.21.06 , 23:35 

Here’s a particularly forlorn historical date: Almost 90 years ago, between the 19th and 20th of December 1917, in the midst of the Bolshevik revolution and civil war, Lenin signed a decree calling for the establishment of The All-Russian Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution and Sabotage, also known as Cheka. 

 
Within a short period of time, Cheka became the largest and cruelest state security organization. Its organizational structure was changed every few years, as were its names: From Cheka to GPU, later to NKVD, and later to KGB. 
 
We cannot know with certainty the number of deaths Cheka was responsible for in its various manifestations, but the number is surely at least 20 million, including victims of the forced collectivization, the hunger, large purges, expulsions, banishments, executions, and mass death at Gulags. 
 
Whole population strata were eliminated: Independent farmers, ethnic minorities, members of the bourgeoisie, senior officers, intellectuals, artists, labor movement activists, “opposition members” who were defined completely randomly, and countless members of the Communist party itself.
 
In his new, highly praised book “The War of the World, “Historian Niall Ferguson writes that no revolution in the history of mankind devoured its children with the same unrestrained appetite as did the Soviet revolution. In his book on the Stalinist purges, Tel Aviv University’s Dr. Igal Halfin writes that Stalinist violence was unique in that it was directed internally. 
 
Lenin, Stalin, and their successors could not have carried out their deeds without wide-scale cooperation of disciplined “terror officials,” cruel interrogators, snitches, executioners, guards, judges, perverts, and many bleeding hearts who were members of the progressive Western Left and were deceived by the Soviet regime of horror and even provided it with a kosher certificate. 
 
All these things are well-known to some extent or another, even though the former Soviet Union’s archives have not yet been fully opened 

to the public. But who knows about this? Within Russia itself, very few people have been brought to justice for their crimes in the NKVD’s and KGB’s service. The Russian public discourse today completely ignores the question of “How could it have happened to us?” As opposed to Eastern European nations, the Russians did not settle the score with their Stalinist past.

 
And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name “Genrikh Yagoda,” the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU’s deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin’s collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system. After Stalin no longer viewed him favorably, Yagoda was demoted and executed, and was replaced as chief hangman in 1936 by Yezhov, the “bloodthirsty dwarf.”
 
Yezhov was not Jewish but was blessed with an active Jewish wife. In his Book “Stalin: Court of the Red Star”, Jewish historian Sebag Montefiore writes that during the darkest period of terror, when the Communist killing machine worked in full force, Stalin was surrounded by beautiful, young Jewish women.
 
Stalin’s close associates and loyalists included member of the Central Committee and Politburo Lazar Kaganovich. Montefiore characterizes him as the “first Stalinist” and adds that those starving to death in Ukraine, an unparalleled tragedy in the history of human kind aside from the Nazi horrors and Mao’s terror in China, did not move Kaganovich. 
 
Many Jews sold their soul to the devil of the Communist revolution and have blood on their hands for eternity. We’ll mention just one more: Leonid Reichman, head of the NKVD’s special department and the organization’s chief interrogator, who was a particularly cruel sadist. 
 
In 1934, according to published statistics, 38.5 percent of those holding the most senior posts in the Soviet security apparatuses were of Jewish origin. They too, of course, were gradually eliminated in the next purges. In a fascinating lecture at a Tel Aviv University convention this week, Dr. Halfin described the waves of soviet terror as a “carnival of mass murder,” “fantasy of purges”, and “essianism of evil.” Turns out that Jews too, when they become captivated by messianic ideology, can become great murderers, among the greatest known by modern history. 
 
The Jews active in official communist terror apparatuses (In the Soviet Union and abroad) and who at times led them, did not do this, obviously, as Jews, but rather, as Stalinists, communists, and “Soviet people.” Therefore, we find it easy to ignore their origin and “play dumb”: What do we have to do with them? But let’s not forget them. My own view is different. I find it unacceptable that a person will be considered a member of the Jewish people when he does great things, but not considered part of our people when he does amazingly despicable things. 

stalins-jews.pdf

 

George Hunt – The New World Bank, Religion, and Rulers 1987

George Hunt became aware of the environmental fraud after attending the Wilderness Conference in Colorado in 1987.

From then until his death Dec 23rd 2013 George dedicated himself to exposing the environmental fraud, masterminded by Maurice Strong and his boss, Baron Edmund de Rothschild.

Video The Oven

Video TheirTube

Website The Bernician

If you are interested in knowing who, how and why the plans for ‘sustainable development’ were founded and by whom, look no further than George’s courageous expose.

The Big Bad Bank
The expose documentary by George Washington Hunt of a secret bank created over the past 25 years.

The Big Bad Bank – Intro
The Big Bad Bank Intro George Washington Hunt introduces us to the World Conservation Bank. Mr. Hunt also explains his background and how he discovered the plan for this bank. One of the handouts included the Brundtland Report “Our Common Future” as well George reveals what the bank will need to get it’s feet off the ground.

The Big Bad Bank – Responsibility to Educate
The Big Bad Bank by George Washington Hunt, in this part he goes further into his background on how he assumed the vast education responsibility to educate us about the World Conservation Bank. We listen to the voice of David Lang, and elitist who tells us how the common people shouldn’t be told about this bank. Then we look at the wilderness inventory and what the US stands to lose as part of conservation projects that the bank will control. George Hunt goes into further explanation of how the Rich Evil Elitists are like and what they will own and how they can handle things.

The Big Bad Bank – Your Educator
The Big Bad Bank – George Washington Hunt is your educator, it’s his goal to educate millions of people about this bank. George also points out that the banks requiring bailouts should not have been saved and cost the tax payers dearly. The Big Bad Bank or The World Conservation Bank was formed at the 4th World Wilderness Congress in Estes Park in September 1987, the bank could be capitalized by the shares of stock and trusts of the members. The big problems are that the currency unit will rise to high, prices will skyrocket, and the worst part is that the bank will purposely go bust and all of the assets will be left in the hands of the shareholders in this bank. Also in this part of the video we hear from Baron Edmond James de Rothschild about technologies that the bank will use to ultimately come to its demise.

The Big Bad Bank – Conservation
The Big Bad Bank – George Washington Hunt tells us how he was selected as an official host at the 4th World Wilderness Congress. Thinking it was an environmental event he attended but his attention was shifted to bank matters, some of the people George met were the international bankers including David Rockefeller, Baron Edmond James de Rothschild, the Prime Minister of Norway Gro Harlem Brundtland and Maurice Strong.

The Big Bad Bank – Greed and Power
The Big Bad Bank – This section focus on Greed and Power of the largest international bankers, the most famous was J.P. Morgan. George Washington Hunt’s Great Grandfather, Also GW Hunt, was building a railroad, at the same time Edward Henry Harriman was also building a railroad in the same direction and Harriman was able to go to JP Morgan for funds to continue his railroad and beat GW Hunt to the pass because he had the money to do so. More on the rich and powerful we get a little history on the Rothschild family as well as the Rockefeller family. “The custodian of the Planet” Maurice Strong is also a big player in the politics of this bank. Strong was working to take water from the San Luis Valley in Colorado and sell it at high profit margins to other cities in the US.

The Big Bad Bank – Reviewing the Scenario
The Big Bad Bank – Reviewing the Scenario, George Washington Hunt reminds us of what is involved with this bank and how they plan on making a whole lot of money by doing things such as those of Maurice Strong and how he was planning on destroying the wilderness in the San Luis Valley of Colorado but at the same time was also working as an environmentalists with the big investors in this Big Bad Bank. We also hear the voice of Maurice Strong speaking about this conservation bank and introducing Baron Edmond de Rothschild.

The Big Bad Bank – The Rich Elite
The Big Bad Bank – Here we see an article about David Rockefeller and William Ruckleshaus speaking about this bank, we also learn more about the Rothschild family, Nathan Rothschild had inside knowledge of the outcome of Battle of Waterloo in the war of 1816 and was able to quickly turn the events out in his favor and wound up owning the Bank of England overnight. One possible solution to turning this Big Bad Bank over to good has would be if the G-77 Countries of the world took charge and hired the best talent, rather than a private bank which could turn on the people.

The Big Bad Bank – Closing Statements
The Big Bad Bank – Bailouts, One big Bad Bank and more problems that America has, including the debt to the Federal Reserve. John F Kennedy tried to solve America’s problem with the Federal Reserve by having more money printed, but that’s a whole other theory. Wrapping up the show and quickly touching on what George Washington Hunt has presented to us in this video as well as a few last points about current events and theories about expensive and harmful environment projects.

Source

Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison II: Deconstruction Of The Myth

December 15, 2010

by Jonathan Azaziah 

Notice of Use

All articles, poetry and lyrics are the copywritten property of Jonathan Azaziah. Websites and individuals can post the written works of Jonathan Azaziah as long as they provide the name of Jonathan Azaziah and a link to http://www.maskofzion.com.

About Me

Source

Not since Zionist warmonger Barack Obama’s ‘ascension’ to the US presidency, has there been such a hysteria in the anti-war/anti-Zionist community as there is with Julian Assange and his organization, Wikileaks. Just like Obama, whose smooth-talker persona duped millions of awakened individuals, lulling them into a false sense of security with lies and trickery, Wikileaks has pulled the wool over the eyes of average people and distinguished activists and writers alike with its ‘whistleblower’ image. Even after Obama’s Zionist roots were exposed, in which powerful pro-Israel figures like Abner Mikva, Joel Sprayregen, Newton Minow, Bettylu Saltzman of the dynastic Saltzman family, Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf, Lester Crown of the vastly wealthy Crown household and Penny Pritzker of the Pritzker dynasty nurtured his rise to political stardom in Chicago (1), the current puppet of the Zionist entity was no less supported and no less loved by his starry-eyed followers. 
After Obama was designated the democratic ‘candidate’ for president, he delivered a speech at AIPAC and announced to his masters that the United States has an ‘unshakeable commitment to Israel’s security (2).’ Still, the opinions of his followers remained unchanged. And not even after Obama maintained utter silence during Operation Cast Lead (3), in which the usurping Tel Aviv regime murdered 1,440 innocent Palestinians in illegally besieged and occupied Gaza, including 431 children, did his legions of drones realize that the slogans of hope and change they so vehemently believed in, were really just smoke and mirrors. Only recently, due to Obama spreading the Zionist Bush administration’s ‘Project for a New American Century’ to Yemen, expanding the murderous drone strikes in Pakistan, as well as increasing the genocides in occupied Iraq and occupied Afghanistan, have some of his once seemingly mind-controlled supporters snapped out of their trance. Plenty of them still continue their blindness however.
Assange and Wikileaks make the Zionist-fueled Obama hype look minuscule; like rain drops in an ocean. Wikileaks, touted and fully endorsed by the Zionist media, has become the peak of resistance and dissidence. The greatest whistleblower in the history of whistleblowing. Assange has been elevated to god status, eclipsing rock stars and movie stars. Wikileaks cannot be questioned. Assange cannot be investigated. Everything the organization does is for the good of the people, and everything Assange says is absolute 100% fact. 
Though it may come as a shock to those who have bought into the absurdity of Wikileaks, everything aforementioned is a morbid delusion. Wikileaks is no whistleblower. Assange is no hero. And the leaks, which have been hailed across the globe, aren’t even leaks. Wikileaks isn’t just toxic Zionist poison, it is a full-blown US-Zionist intelligence operation.

Wikileaks isn’t the first example of Zionist foreknowledge.

Israeli Foreknowledge and Arrogance

One day after the World Trade Center was demolished with military-grade thermite explosives, mass murderer of Gaza Benjamin Netanyahu told the Zionist-owned New York Times that the 9/11 attacks were ‘very good’ for US-Israeli relations, and that they would generate immediate sympathy for the Zionist entity (4). One year after Netanyahu made these audacious declarations, he delivered a speech to the US House of Representatives, laying out reasons why the obliteration of Iraq is necessary for the survival of Israel (5). In 2008, the Zionist war criminal delivered a speech to an Israeli university, reiterating his comments about the Mossad false flag on 9/11, as well as stating that his regime is benefitting from the ‘American struggle in Iraq (6).’As recent as July of this year, Netanyahu has publicly declared that any withdrawal from Iraq will leave the Tel Aviv regime vulnerable to ‘renewed hostilities (7).’
Netanyahu continued this pattern of arrogant behavior with Wikileaks, by revealing that the usurping entity had prior knowledge to the organization’s upcoming leaks on the day that ‘Cablegate’ began, just hours before the release (8). Netanyahu stated that the Zionist entity wouldn’t be the ‘center of international attention.’ The following day, Netanyahu reaffirmed this revelation by stating that Israel ‘wasn’t harmed at all;’ a senior official in his Zionist administration also said that ‘we come out looking very good (9).’ On the same day, former national security advisors to butcher of Lebanon Ehud Olmert and Sabra and Shatilah massacre architect Ariel Sharon boasted that ‘Israel benefits from these leaks (10).’ Israel’s Finance Minister, Yuval Steinitz, when asked about the leaks on Israel Radio, said that he ‘doesn’t see damage. Quite the opposite (11).’ Israeli mouthpiece newspapers emboldened the statements of their murderous leaders, with one opining that ‘had Wikileaks not existed, Israel would have had to invent it (12).’ This statement in particular will prove not only to be devilishly ironic, but another example of Israeli foreknowledge. 
While nations all over the world, nations of Resistance and nations of oppression alike, scrambled to defend themselves from the Wikileaks onslaught, several officials of the illegitimate Zionist state, including the prime minister himself, openly affirmed the impregnableness of Israel. No damage, a bounty of satisfaction and a plethora of benefits. The questions are simple: If the Zionist entity isn’t behind Wikileaks, how did its officials know it wouldn’t become the subject of international media scrutiny? If Wikileaks wasn’t protecting the Zionist agenda, why would Israeli officials intransigently say their illegal occupying entity remained unharmed after the leaks? And if in fact Israel is operating Wikileaks, then the Zionist media’s depictions of Assange and his crew as whistleblowers are monstrously false, aren’t they? Logic and common sense should guide all to the blatant, blue and white six-pointed-star-shaped answers.

 

Red Mafiya Don Semion Mogilevich

is left out of Cablegate deliberately.

 

Cablegate Fraud I: The Obviousness

Like the Afghan War Diary and the Iraq War Logs which mixed Zionist hasbara with facts about American and British war crimes, Wikileaks’ Cablegate documents mix truths with Zionist lies to maximize the potential of the disinformation campaign. And like the previous leaks, the truths that are released are examples that were revealed and reported on by activists and journalists alike long before Wikileaks was relentlessly and aggressively force-fed to the masses by the Zionist media. 
Included are shockers like Israel attempted to coordinate its Operation Cast Lead assault on illegally blockaded Gaza with traitorous Palestinian collaborationist Mahmoud Abbas and the brutal Zionist dictator of Egypt, Hosni Mubarak (13). Revelations like Ali Abdullah Saleh, US-Saudi puppet president of Yemen, covered up US air strikes that murdered children (14). Discoveries like the US is waging a ‘secret’ war inside Pakistan (15). Eye-openers like a Lebanese official offering advice to the Zionist entity on how to trample the Lebanese Resistance movement, Hezbollah (16), or the US flying spy missions over Lebanon from its Diego Garcia base (17). Or quite possibly the largest and most apocalyptic divulgement: the Israeli mafia exists prominently within the illegitimate usurping entity, and is a very, very dangerous group (18). How incredibly overwhelming. The name of Assange’s putrid organization should be Wikiobviousness, not Wikileaks. 
Mahmoud Abbas has been exposed over and over again as a treasonist to the Palestinian people since he became an integral part of Middle Eastern politics, or more accurately, the Zionist Power Configuration. Since 2005, Abbas’s Palestinian ‘Authority’ has been cooperating with the Zionist entity through ‘security coordination (19),’ which links the two illegitimate powers to a crackdown on all elements that support Resistance to Zionism. Despite denial after denial by Abbas himself and his spokespersons, he finally admitted to this filthy collaboration in March of this year (20). Israel and Mubarak’s regime have transferred weapons to Abbas, and the US has given Fatah hundreds of millions of dollars in aid to undermine Palestinian Resistance, chiefly Hamas, and to strengthen the Zionist stranglehold on occupied Palestine (21). Mahmoud Abbas has deep financial ties to Tel Aviv, which also amounts to hundreds of millions of dollars given to Fatah by the Israeli government yearly (22). Wikileaks wasn’t needed for this; anyone that is simply capable of reading is well-aware that Abbas is a disgrace to the Palestinian people and a total puppet of the Zionist entity.
Ali Abdullah Saleh is a traitor to the Yemeni people; like Abbas, this has been known for decades. He sold Yemen to the Anglo-American oil agenda, and then solidified the sellout by entering into billion dollar slave-agreements with the Zionist-infested World Bank and IMF (23). Saleh is a habitual recipient of the American oppressor’s aid money (24), and as of January of this year, he’s been receiving this blood money on an even greater scale (25). He has used these funds along with money from the House of Saud to wage a brutal war against the Resistance of southern Yemen (26). The US dropped cluster bombs on Yemen in December of 2009, and it was well reported in the alternative media sphere; this murderous attack claimed the lives of 120 innocents and wounded 40 others (27), not 41 as Assange’s organization erroneously reports. Telling the world that American bombs kill civilians is like telling someone that the sky is blue or that the sun is hot. There was no need for ‘whistleblowing’ on this matter. 
Yemen is Zion’s newest target; sickeningly pro-Israel war criminal Joe Lieberman called for preemptive strikes against the Arab nation last year in late December (28), and Obama’s Zionist administration obliged by increasing its illegal military presence inside the country (29). Despite wide-ranged reporting in the Zionist media and the anti-Zionist media, Ali Abdullah Saleh continued his role as a stooge, and denied the presence of America inside Yemen (30). Now, Obama and his gang of criminals have set forth a plan for an even larger military mobilization which will be followed by an occupation (31). In addition, Mossad is carrying out assassinations and other terrorist operations against the Yemeni Resistance in the south (32). Don’t expect to see any of this information in the Cablegate documents though; Wikileaks must protect Israel at all costs.
The CIA has been conducting a war with its murderous predator drones against Pakistan since 2004 (33), and it has been doing so from Pakistani bases thanks to one criminal administration after another (34). 90% of the people murdered by these CIA drones are civilians (35), and these attacks occur close to every single day (36). It was reported in 2008 (37), and in February of 2010 (38), that US Special Forces were engaging in terrorism on the ground in Pakistan. Wikileaks didn’t ‘reveal’ anything about a ‘secret war’ inside the Islamic Republic; it stated a fact that could’ve been reiterated by anyone with a slight interest in geopolitics. 
The real secret war against Pakistan is that which is being conducted by Israel and the Hindutva entity of India. Since the late 1980s, Zionism and Hindutva have signed military agreements and performed covert operations to destroy Pakistan’s nuclear program (39). In 2001, Mossad and RAW created four new agencies to target important personalities in the fields of law, defense, politics and religion, with the hopes of creating all out ‘sectarian’ chaos within Pakistan (40). Codenamed the ‘Dragon Policy,’ Mossad and RAW agents hired mercenaries, druglords and mafia figures to unleash the de-stabilization process (41). Indian and Israeli intelligence have coordinated a string of car bombings with Xe (Blackwater) cells across the Islamic Republic (42), including the massive blast that claimed more than 100 lives in Peshawar, a Mossad stronghold (43), in 2009 (44). 
Hezbollah Secretary General, his eminence, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, has never been bashful about exposing pro-Zionist politicians in Lebanon, with his most recent slashing of the collaborators taking place during a historic speech for Martyrs’ Day (45). While Elias al-Murr has denied the allegations set forth by the Wikileaks PSYOP (46), he is merely and pathetically attempting to save face; it is a well-known fact that the vile Fouad Siniora government (which al-Murr was a part of) tried to disarm Hezbollah and disconnect the Resistance’s telecommunications network on behalf of the Zionist regime and the US (47). Siniora and his goons failed miserably as Hezbollah persevered and triumphed. 
It is also a well known fact that the US conducts spying and military operations, primarily against occupied Iraq and the Islamic Republic of Iran (48), from Diego Garcia; the Indian Ocean territory turned into a military compound by British and American occupiers who have malevolently ethnically cleansed the entire indigenous population (49). On a side note, this evil of course isn’t mentioned by Wikileaks. The mentioning of a few previously known American spy missions in Lebanon is nothing more than a cover for the massive Zionist creature in the room: Israel is notorious for its spy missions in Lebanon, as it has violated Lebanese airspace well over 7,000 times since its crushing defeat at the hands of Hezbollah in the summer of 2006 (50). 
Failing to mention Zionist activity in Lebanon is the equivalent of failing to mention the stars in the sky at nightfall. The Lebanese Resistance and the Lebanese Army have arrested at least 141 Israeli spies since April of last year (51), in the telecommunications, security and military sectors. The Zionist entity infiltrated Alfa, one of Lebanon’s two telecom companies, and used the penetrated network against Hezbollah in the 2006 war (52). Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah exposed the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri as a Mossad operation (53), and in an unsuspected but typical display of arrogance, Israel admitted to benefitting greatly from the murder (54). Tel Aviv had distanced itself from the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL), which is backed by the US (55), as well as the UK (56), but the genocidal maniac Avigdor Lieberman finally confirmed what had been known in Lebanon since the Tribunal’s inception: Israel is heavily contributing to it (57). 
The STL is not only a plot to eliminate Hezbollah, but to completely fragment Lebanon; it should come as no surprise then, that it was designed by Zionist Congressman Howard Berman and the powerful Israeli Lobby group, AIPAC (58). Sayyed Nasrallah uncovered that all of the information collected by the STL ends up in the hands of the usurping Zionist regime (59); it is essentially another Israeli spying operation. The Sayyed also revealed that Israel had not only penetrated Alfa, but all of Lebanon’s telecommunications; the Zionist regime is capable of cloning SIM cards, planting phone numbers, duplicating billing data and making phone calls without the phone-owner’s knowledge (60). Just days ago, Hezbollah telecommunications experts unearthed Israeli spying devices near the southern city of Tyre; when the Zionist entity’s cover was blown, the devices were detonated (61). Not even an inkling of any of this information will be made readily available by treacherous Wikileaks because its purpose is to protect Israeli interests. And at the top of the list of those interests, is to colonize Lebanon, especially the south, as part of Greater Israel (62). 
On the surface, it would seem that the revelations about the influence of Israeli organized crime (OC) within the Zionist settler state are groundbreaking; frightening and shocking even. But further analysis of the cable in question displays more of the same: a repetition of previously known information crossbred with odious lies to form a highly effective damage control operation. It was reported across the Middle East, as well as in Zionist-owned Western media that Israeli mob boss Yaakov Alperon was assassinated in 2008 (63), as was the intransigence of Israeli mafia stalwart Zeev Rosenstein, who was arrested in 2004 for the distribution of unfathomable amounts of ecstasy (64). It was also already known that the new generation of Israeli gangsters were receiving training in the fields of assassination and ordnance during their service in IOF (65). These cases of obviousness however do not vindicate Wikileaks but condemn it in an even harsher manner due to the propaganda also contained within the cable. 
The cable states ‘It is not entirely clear to what extent OC elements have penetrated the Israeli establishment and corrupt public officials.’ What an obscene falsification; since the 1980s, the Israeli mafia has exerted a gargantuan amount of control over the occupying government in Tel Aviv, coordinating this corruption from New York City and the streets of occupied Palestine (66). The cable also portrays Zionist war criminal Ehud Olmert in a positive light, saying that Olmert called emergency meetings in response to the public safety concerns and promised to add 1,000 officers to the current efforts ‘combating’ organized crime. Another sham; Olmert is a criminal that is incessantly connected to the Israeli mafia (67). Olmert has been charged with corruption regarding Bank Leumi (68), whom notorious blood-diamond dealer Lev Leviev has a major stake in (69). Leviev is deeply connected to organized crime, due to his business ties with Russian-Israeli oligarch and mobster Roman Abramovich (70). 
Quite possibly the most laughable excerpt of all in the entire cable is this statement: ‘Little is known about the full extent of Russian criminal activity in Israel.’ The Israeli mafia IS the Russian-Jewish mafia. The two cannot be separated; like the illegitimate Israeli state and Zionism. The cable also says Arab criminals routinely collaborate with Russian-Israeli crime families. This is erroneous; an attempt to divide the blame equally amongst Arabs and Israelis. The Red Mafiya (Russian Mob) is intensely racist and territorial, collaborating with noone but other Russian factions in their quest for criminal dominance. The Russian criminals not only poured into Israel after the Soviet Union was dissolved, they were invited by the Zionist entity’s government to start their lives anew (71). 
The most powerful gangster in the world, and don of the Russian-Israeli mafia, Semion Mogilevich has his headquarters in Israel (72); his net worth is well over one billion dollars (73), wielding a criminal empire that involves human trafficking, drug dealing, arms peddling, nuclear materials smuggling and blood diamonds. Marat Balagula, another immensely powerful Russian-Jewish gangster made his home in the Zionist entity after leaving the Soviet Union. Balagula’s empire includes gas fraud, credit card fraud, and the usual elements of drugs, illegal weaponry and prostitution, along with ownership of diamond mines in Sierra Leone. Russian-Israeli organized crime, the Organizatsiya, cannot be talked about without mentioning these two prominent figures. It is no surprise that Wikileaks conveniently leaves their names out of the ‘leaks.’ Also left out of the cables is the most damning information about the Red Mafiya of all: unlike Italian-American mobsters, Russian-Jewish mobsters cannot be touched by US intelligence and local law enforcement, for fear of being hammered and character-assassinated by the Zionist lobby for exercising anti-Semitism (74). 
The power of the Red Mafiya was exposed by the late Robert Friedman, a journalist who began investigating the Russian-Jewish criminal gang in 1989 (75), and who wrote a monumental book about their exploits more than a decade ago. His work brought the nonstop heat of Russian-Jewish OC on top of his head, receiving several threats by high-ranking gangsters (76). Despite media reports of him dying of a rare disease he contracted while on an investigative mission in Bombay (Mumbai), all evidence points to the brave Mr. Friedman being poisoned by Mogilevich’s associates (77). Just like Assange, right? 
The destruction of the Wikileaks cables in this section provides clear proof of what Assange’s group actually is: a ‘Limited Hang Out’ operation. Limited Hang Out ops are used by intelligence agencies to deliver well-known information to the public about government corruption and certain political crimes, satisfying their salivation for an expose of misdeeds while withholding the more critical, more secretive information (78). Wikileaks doesn’t reveal; it rehashes. Former director of Mossad Efraim Halevy stated in an interview several years ago, ‘Not one big success of the Mossad has ever been made public (79).’ Wikileaks works diligently to keep it that way.

Cablegate is nothing but a promotion of Zionist propaganda.

Cablegate Fraud II: Disgusting Zionist Lies

In a previous piece on Wikileaks, this author commented, ‘The other accusations sound like concoctions dug up from the dungeons of Zionist think tanks and lobby organizations salivating for the destruction of the Islamic Republic, not the work of whistle-blowers attempting to expose corruption and disseminate truth (80).’ This observation turned out to be a prognostication come true. The cables aren’t really secret government documents. They are propaganda pieces written by Khazarian political officials and diplomats who have spent their lives serving the Israeli Lobby. Among them are US ambassadors to Turkey Eric Edelman and James Jeffrey, Deputy Secretary of State James B. Steinberg, US ambassador to Brazil Clifford Sobel, US charge d’affaires in Saudi Arabia Michael Gfoeller, Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs Philip H. Gordon, career diplomat and current Special Envoy Daniel Fried and US ambassador to Canada David Jacobson (81). This revelation explains why the newest docs from Wikileaks contain even more Zionist drivel than the last release.
The diplomatic cables claim that it was Hamas that broke the ceasefire that led to Operation Case Lead (82). They also brazenly claim that the Zionist entity has no assets in occupied Iraq (83). They insanely say that India has a huge stake in the facilitation of peace in occupied Kashmir (84). The cables belligerently claim that Syrians assassinated Lebanese Premier Saad Hariri’s father, former Premier Rafiq Hariri (85). There is more tiresome tripe about leader of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khamenei, having terminal cancer (86). There is another ridiculous claim that there is an Israeli weapons manufacturer in Haifa which is vital to US security interests (87). One cable disgustingly repeats the age-old Zionist propaganda about Israel attempting to minimize civilian casualties and Hamas using human shields (88). And arguably the most outlandish cable of all, Libyan leader Muammar al-Gaddafi intimidated the British government into freeing wrongfully accused Abdelbaset Mohmed Ali al-Megrahi (89). 
Claiming that the fighters of the Palestinian Resistance, whether it is Hamas or any other faction, use human shields, is a grotesque Zionist lie. There is no evidence on any level whatsoever; it is a nightmarish concoction of the hasbara squads that run the Zionist media. However, there is undeniable evidence that the Zionist entity’s occupation forces have used Palestinian human shields on numerous occasions; 15 times since 2005 began (90). Two IOF soldiers were ‘convicted’ in Israel’s kangaroo courts of using a 9-year boy as a human shield. The boy, Majid, will be scarred for the rest of his life for the horrific abuse he endured at the hands of IOF; the soldiers who abused him were demoted and given suspended sentences in an all too typical display of Zionist justice (91). 
It is another aberration of the historical record to state that Hamas broke the ceasefire, when Hamas did not fire a single rocket into the territory occupied by Zion in the four months since the calm between occupied and occupier began (92). Tel Aviv discarded the cease-fire when it calculatingly murdered 6 Hamas officials in a raid on November 5, 2008 (93). When Hamas returned fire to defend itself and the people of occupied Gaza, the murderous Zionist entity had the pretext it needed to launch Operation Cast Lead, which had been planned years in advance by the upper echelons of the Israeli government, Mossad, Shin Bet and Aman {Israeli military intelligence} (94). Is there an organization outside of the media itself that spews Zionist propaganda better than Wikileaks?
Obviously, Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khamenei isn’t dying of cancer; this absurd allegation has been repeated over and over through the years by several mainstream media outlets. It was reported in 2006 that the revolutionary leader was ‘dying of serious cancer and wouldn’t live much more than a year (95).’ In 2007, it was reported as fact that Sayyed Khamenei was dead from his ‘long battle’ with cancer (96). In 2009, foul Zionist Michael Ledeen wrote that the Ayatollah collapsed into a coma as a result of his cancer (97). It should be noted that Ledeen, who has close ties with AIPAC and Zionist war criminal Richard Perle (98), has been a driving force behind the idea that Iran is behind all of the chaos in occupied Iraq (99), which Wikileaks presented a strong case for in its propaganda-filled Iraq War Logs (100). Taking into account that the diplomatic cables are in fact written by Zionists, the connection between Ledeen and Wikileaks isn’t all that surprising. This petty and childish claim about the Ayatollah having cancer is part of a broader psychological warfare operation to discredit, disunite and utterly humiliate the Islamic Republic. The Ayatollah’s ‘cancer’ can be placed in the trash alongside other nonsense like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s Jewish roots and the Israeli star being engraved into several buildings in Tehran (101). 
Not only has Saad Hariri himself already rejected the claims of Syria being behind his father’s brutal assassination (102), as mentioned in a previous section, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah has provided hard evidence that the Zionist entity was the orchestrator of the former premier’s killing (103). All claims to the contrary are extensions of the Zionist campaign to destroy the Lebanese Resistance. 
The Hindutva entity of India has been criminally occupying Kashmir for 63 years, how can such a regime have a ‘huge stake in facilitating peace?’ Since 1989, more than 100,000 innocents have been murdered, over 100,000 children were orphaned, over 22,000 women have been widowed, nearly 10,000 women have been raped, nearly 120,000 Kashmiris have been illegally detained and over 105,000 architectural structures have been razed by the occupying military (104). Mass graves have been found all over the occupied Valley (105). Military torture is common place in occupied Kashmir; sexual abuse, sleep deprivation, electrocution, beatings and stripping prisoners naked are only some of the acts of brutality that have been forced upon the people of Kashmir (106). 
Not a single one of these ungodly crimes against humanity are mentioned by Wikileaks; the occupation itself isn’t even mentioned. Instead, Assange’s organization ‘vindicates’ the Hindutvadis by ‘revealing’ that the ISI coordinates terror attacks in occupied Afghanistan (107). More disgraceful Zionist propaganda. Indian officials have been almost as bold as the Zionist entity, stating that they are ‘not concerned’ about Wikileaks (108). Other officials have boasted that they are ‘not embarrassed’ by Cablegate (109). India is the Zionist entity’s closest ally in Asia; the two racist regimes have collaborated in the occupation of Kashmir and spreading mayhem across Pakistan (110), and the fact that Hindutva isn’t concerned or embarrassed by so-called leaks of secret documents is beyond suspicious; it is collusive.
The theory that Israel is vital to American security, or that it is a satellite of the American ‘empire,’ is typical leftist rubbish to downplay the crimes of Zionism and Zionist power in the US. It is also contradictory to the facts. America doesn’t have a base in occupied Palestine, nor does it have any troops. It only stores minimal weaponry inside the Zionist entity, and this weaponry can be used by IOF at any time, without American permission. Israeli bases cannot be used by the United States. No US puppet that borders the land that Zion stole from Palestine can conduct reconnaissance over Israel, let alone use Zionist bases for taking off. At times, especially after the war of 1973, Israel has undermined the relations between America and other Middle Eastern nations. And due to the chokehold that the Zionist Lobby has on the US government, whenever Israel is being attacked in the international community, America runs like a dog to defend its owner (111). There is no American ‘imperialism’ in Israel, although there is plenty of Zionism in America. Israel serves no interest but its own, manipulating any nation that it needs to, including the genocidal US, to accomplish the goals of international Zionism.
Apart from being another ugly Zionist falsehood, it is an insult to the intelligence of the people to postulate that Israel has no ‘assets’ in occupied Iraq. The sanctions against Iraq, the occupation and subsequent genocide were designed by a neoconservative cabal with dual loyalties to the illegitimate state of Israel (112). No official from this exclusive Zionist group has been harmed by the Wikileaks cables; not one. Mossad has agents stationed across Iraq from Mosul to Fallujah to Baghdad to Najaf to Karbala, wreaking havoc on the Iraqi people with Israeli-made IEDs and car bombs (113). In 2004, there were casualties everyday from made-in-Zion IEDs, and in 2005, three out of five Iraqis that were murdered met their end due to an IED (114). Mossad operations continue to this very moment in Iraq, with the Israeli agency’s masterpiece being the animalistic display of savagery at Sayedat al-Najat Cathedral in Karada, Baghdad, which claimed the lives of 58 Iraqi Christians (115). Wikileaks has done an excellent job at convincing the world that Israel has nothing to do with the annihilation of Iraq; but Assange’s malicious smokescreen is as weak as a spider’s web when challenged with the indestructible blade of the truth.
If it wasn’t being presented as unquestionable gospel, the abominable claim that Muammar al-Gaddafi intimidated the British government into releasing Abdelbaset Mohmed Ali al-Megrahi would be exceedingly funny. The idea that Gaddafi, who was terrorized by Mossad throughout the 1980s (116), somehow bullied the British government, whose intelligence agency MI5 orchestrated the 7/7 terror attacks with Mossad (117), is a slander against al-Megrahi, whose life was ruined by the Lockerbie incident, and a deflection of evidence regarding who was really behind the attack. In fact, it was the British government intimidating and threatening Gaddafi (118). Al-Megrahi wasn’t released due to Libyan intimidation, he was released because he was innocent; there wasn’t a drop of evidence against him (119), and the Western conspiratorial charade couldn’t last any longer. Lockerbie, like 7/7, 9/11, 26/11 and so many other recent ‘terrorist’ attacks blamed on Muslims, was a Mossad false flag intended to influence geopolitics to the detriment of Islamic nations (120). False flags, an Israeli speciality, haven’t just been ‘looked over’ by Wikileaks, they’ve been deliberately left out for the sole benefit of the repulsive Zionist entity. 
The cables dissected here are only a drop in the bucket of hundreds of documents ‘released’ during Cablegate. The Zionist propaganda speaks for itself. It is shameful that so many have accepted this proverbial waste as if it were a holy declaration spoken by a prophet. Simply shameful.

Both of these nations have been assaulted by Wikileaks.

Targeted by Zion: Turkey and Iran

Since Zionist commandoes barbarically executed 9 Turkish peace activists in international waters on May 31st of this year (121), the relationship between Turkey and Israel has become severely strained and entered into a realm of complication. On the positive side, amidst calls from its citizenry, Ankara has taken several steps to disconnect itself from Zionism. Turkish intelligence completely cut its ties with Mossad (122). Turkey also cancelled three extremely lucrative military exercises directly after the Freedom Flotilla massacre (123). Turkey has also continually voted against the illegal sanctions against Iran and signed joint energy agreements with the Islamic Republic and Brazil (124), much to the dispay and the ZOG in America and the Zionist entity itself. Prime Minister Erdogan also defended Hezbollah against the Zionist-designed STL in his recent visit to Lebanon (125).
On the negative side however, all of Prime Minister Erdogan’s harsh rhetoric against the Zionist regime (126), which he unleashed even while he was being threatened with Mossad assassination (127), has proven to be nothing more than just that: rhetoric. Throughout all of the condemning and slamming of Israel, Erdogan and other Turkish officials have continually called for an apology and compensation from the Zionist state, as recently as December 7th(128); as if an apology will undo the murder of 9 innocent peace activists. As if an apology will heal the pain of their families, or bring their killers to justice for crimes against humanity. Israel committed an act of war against Turkey, and Erdogan wants an apology? It extends beyond strangeness and becomes insanity. 
Just days after the massacre, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu simplified everything by saying if Israel lifted the blockade against Gaza, Turkish-Israeli ties will ‘normalize.’ This normalization must also include the illegal 62-year occupation of Palestine, as well as the illegal occupations of Lebanese and Syrian lands, which Turkey has traditionally ignored while making $2.5 billion in imports and exports since 2000 via a free trade agreement with Tel Aviv (129). He also declared, ‘The security of Israeli diplomats and Israeli tourists is our nation’s honor. We will be making sure they are safe (130).’ The citizens of Turkey were murdered by Israel, and Davutoglu is concerned about the safety of the defenders of murder and illegal occupation? Shouldn’t his concern be with making his citizens safe, along with all those oppressed by Zionism? This politically correct square dance for the sake of pleasing Israel is absolutely revolting. 
Disturbingly, while Erdogan showed solidarity with the Lebanese Resistance in his November trip to Lebanon, he also showed solidarity with Israel, unconscionably saying that when peace and security are restored in the region, Israel will ‘win from this peace (131).’ Odd would be an understatement for this remark. Israel is the reason for the lack of security and peace in the region. Israel is the oppressor, occupier, de-stabilizer, murderer, bomber, gangster, assassin, shooter and killer in the Middle East, from one end to the other. As long as this entity remains, peace will never be prospective. Zionism must end for peace to be a reality.
Furthermore, the most abhorrent part of Erdogan’s behavior is his atrocious denial of the Armenian Genocide (132), one of history’s greatest crimes in which the Young Turks movement systematically murdered 1.5 million innocent Armenians between 1915-1923. Erdogan made an even bigger fool out of himself when he preposterously claimed that Armenians ‘exterminated’ Turks (133). This continues the typical stance of all Turkish regimes, which have denied the Armenian Genocide for more than 90 years (134). The Armenian Genocide has always been an event attacked and denied by the Zionist media and Zionist lobby also, most notably the criminal ADL (135), due to the scarcely talked-about facts surrounding the perpetrators of it. 
The Young Turks weren’t Turkish Muslims as it is widely accepted, but Zionists of ‘Jewish’ origin with direct connections to B’nai B’rith, Zionist bankers and the founder of Irgun himself, mass murderer Vladimir Jabotinsky (136). The man who the Zionist Young Turks brought to power (and who also partook in their savage activities), and who is credited with the secularization of Turkey, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, was no more a Muslim than vile Zionist Hillary Clinton; he, like his brethren in the Young Turks, had ‘Jewish’ roots and was known for constantly reciting prayers from the racist, unholy Talmud and the xenophobic Kabbalah (137). Turkey denies this shocking truth as well, sticking to the Zionist lie which is promoted to cause division between Muslims and Christians.
The historical cover-up of the Zionist nature of Ataturk and the Young Turks is pertinent to the character of Erdogan, because he was once an opponent of Ataturk’s secular ideology, and spent time in a Turkish prison for ‘inciting religious hatred’ after reciting a poem with strong Islamic convictions (138). All of these anomalies, coupled with what comes after Wikileaks’ released cables, prove that Erdogan is nothing more than an opportunistic coward, and it is no wonder that Lebanon’s Armenian community courageously protested his visit to their country (139). 
With Turkey, and Erdogan in particular, teetering on the brink of a radical foreign policy shift, in what would be a global game-changer, in comes Julian Assange and Wikileaks with yet another startling revelation: Turkey aided and abetted Al-Qaeda in occupied Iraq (140). Though Erdogan subsequently blasted the cables (141), he mentioned nothing about the undeniable fact that Al-Qaeda is a work of fiction (142), or that Israel is behind Wikileaks; he just barked and barked with his usual fiery rhetoric, and then kowtowed to Zionism when the power brokers in Tel Aviv called. 
It is a direct result of the international embarrassment at the hands of Israel via Wikileaks’ Cablegate, that Erdogan sent Turkish helicopters to Israel and told Benjamin Netanyahu that Turkey will coordinate NATO relief efforts inside the Zionist entity when massive forest fires erupted (143). It is this Zionist smear campaign that is the reason why Turkey is now engaged in high-level talks with the Israeli regime to ‘mend’ its relations with Palestine’s occupier (144). And for what seemed impossible days after the Freedom Flotilla massacre, it is because of Cablegate that an official proposal has been drawn up for Israel to express regret for acting in self-defense and unintentionally killing the Turkish citizens aboard the Mavi Marmara, issue compensation to the families of the slain activists, while preventing prosecution of the IOF commandoes that carried out the murders (145). Justice, peace, solidarity and whatever little dignity Erdogan had, have gone out the window because of Wikileaks; proving that Turkey still is what it has been since the Zionist Young Turks obliterated the Ottoman Empire and exterminated 1.5 million innocent Armenians: an utter tool of Zionism. It is also evident that the calls of Huseyin Celik, a senior Turkish official who accused Israel of initiating the Cablegate ‘leak,’ have fallen upon deaf ears in Ankara (146). 
Senior Israeli intelligence correspondent for Haaretz, Yossi Melman, recently wrote that Cablegate was the work of Mossad, and it was connected with several other recent events in the ongoing international Western intelligence campaign assaulting Iran (147). Benjamin Netanyahu has stated that Wikileaks proves that the Zionist entity is ‘right’ on Iran, and that the entire Middle East is concerned about Iran’s ‘nuclear ambitions (148).’ This constant Israeli lordliness is a reflection of Cablegate eclipsing the Iraq War Logs in terms of the audacity of untruth about the Islamic Republic. Besides, what would a Wikileaks document dump be without Zionist propaganda against Iran? 
The most talked about leaks have most certainly been those mentioning the leaders of the Gulf States expressing not just mere concern about Iran’s nuclear capabilities, but fierce encouragement of an attack on the Islamic Republic (149). There are also cables regarding the 2009 Iranian elections, which Wikileaks calls a ‘coup d’etat,’ and that the revolutionary nation ‘engineered’ Ahmadinejad’s victory (150). Other cables say that Iran has secretly purchased long-range missiles from North Korea (151). There are cables that say Iran is smuggling weapons out of Turkmenistan, in a violation of its neighbor’s sovereignty (152). And of course, there is no shortage on the propaganda regarding Iran aggressively pursing nuclear weapons (153), with one cable even suggesting that Pakistan is a ‘regional competitor (154).’ 
First and foremost, the 2009 Iranian elections were anything but stolen; Mahmoud Ahmadinejad won by a landslide, attaining well over 60% of the votes submitted (155). There is not a single shred of evidence that Iran’s elections were ‘stolen,’ but there is overwhelming evidence that the US, inspired by the Israeli Lobby, spent hundreds of millions of dollars on programs that would de-stabilize Iran and facilitate regime change (156). The Zionist media sold the Western masses a cockamamie story about fraudulent elections based on unsubstantiated reports from Twitter (157), where Mossad agents have been conducting cyber warfare through hasbara since Operation Cast Lead (158). 
This subject however, with all of the facts, has been thoroughly documented by many activists, writers and scholars. The objective of Cablegate was to assault Iran diplomatically, fracturing its ties with the Arab region, as well as to foment ‘sectarian’ tension between Sunni and Shia, Arab and Persian. This miserly Zionist plot has failed however, because regardless of the feelings of the corrupt, US-owned leaders of the Gulf States, 88% of the Arab citizens view Israel as the predominant threat in the region, 77% view America as the threat, while a minute 10% view Iran as a threat; there is also overwhelming support for Iran’s peaceful nuclear program (159). Ethnicity and religion are irrelevant; in defiance of US-Zionist efforts, Resistance will support Resistance always.
The attempted scheme to disrupt and destroy Iran’s diplomatic relations with the Arab world, especially as Iran works with Syria and Saudi Arabia for peace in Lebanon, efforts which Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah has called ‘sincere (160),’ has also failed. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has slammed Wikileaks as psychological warfare; he further said that the information wasn’t leaked, but organized, and went on to say, ‘We are friends with the regional countries and mischievous acts will not affect relations (161).’ Iran’s Parliament Speaker, Ali Larijani said that the enemies of regional stability are behind Wikileaks and it is only an attempt to promote discord (162). Iran’s former Foreign Minister, Manouchehr Mottaki said the ‘questionable’ Wikileaks documents will not affect Iran’s brotherly and friendly relations with the Gulf States (163). 
Cablegate opened up the gates for two significant events: new, stronger illegal sanctions against the Islamic Republic by the United States (164), and another Mossad assassination of an Iranian scientist, Majid Shahriari (165). Jeffrey Goldberg, the Israeli-American journalist that spread horrific lies to promote the Zionist invasion of Iraq (166), used Cablegate to spread an even more ludicrous premise, that an Arab Lobby is supporting a war against Iran, and not a ‘Jewish’ Lobby (167). Zionist David Frum, Bush’s former speechwriter and loathsome war criminal, has also used Cablegate to justify an all-out military offensive against Iran (168). 
It is troubling, that many in the ‘anti-war’ movement have ignored the Zionist fingerprints all over Wikileaks, and have stated that an American war against Iran will never happen; they have outlandishly stated that there is no evidence of such a war, and even more outlandishly, that Wikileaks has exposed Iranian support of American ‘imperialism.’ It is troubling, that it will take another Zionist-designed genocide to awaken such persons from their media-induced slumber. The war against Iran isn’t happening in the future, nor is it a fabrication; the US-Zionist war against Iran is taking place right now. And it has been for quite some time.
The United States has surrounded the Islamic Republic with gunboats on numerous occasions, halted Iranian ships for arms shipments to the Resistance of Gaza, financed and educated Iranian ‘dissidents’ to bring about a pro-Western regime totally disconnected from the Islamic Revolution, kidnaped Iranian diplomats in occupied Iraq, kidnaped Iranian military personal on the Iranian border and then tortured them inside Iraq, continually spied on Iran and violated its sovereignty, attacked Iran’s currency and its international financial affairs, and funded ‘terrorist’ proxies to carry out murderous attacks on innocents within Iran (169). The organization Jundullah, has waged barbaric warfare against the Islamic Republic, claiming thousands of lives; Jundullah is fully backed by the CIA and receives nearly $400 million a year from the US State Department (170). Mossad is also linked to Jundullah, providing training for the front operation, and coordinating several strikes against Iranian mosques (171). Ardeshire Hassanpour, a 44-year old Iranian nuclear scientist, was assassinated by Mossad in 2007 (172). Just days before the Cablegate release, Israel skyjacked an Iranian plane for the 130th time since 1984 (173). The Stuxnet computer virus, which originated in Israel (174), was unleashed on Iran’s industrial sector, including its nuclear power plant, by the Zionist entity in September of this year (175). Will this suffice as enough evidence of acts of war against Iran? Everything aforesaid is only part of the American-Israeli onslaught against the Islamic Revolution; to weaken it before the long-planned invasion and occupation.
Wikileaks, with extensive help from the Zionist media, has broken Turkey and deepened international Zionism’s war against Iran. Wikileaks’ largest success however, has been its coopting of the worldwide activist network, totally blinding it from seeing its function as the archer for every target that the Zionist entity considers an enemy.

Wikileaks is an Israeli-American intelligence operation.

Wikileaks Exposed: The CIA, Google, PROMIS and More

Some authors and writers have suggested that an intelligence service may be behind Wikileaks, and others, like Pakistani Army General Mirza Aslam Beg have said outright that only CIA and Mossad could be behind such an operation (176). The General is spot on; Wikileaks has several connections to US intelligence, and these connections uncover several mysteries about Wikileaks, including who they are exactly and what exactly it is that they do.
Co-Founder of Wikileaks, John Young, whom Julian Assange calls Wikileaks’ spiritual godfather, left the organization in its early stages after labeling it a CIA operation for data-mining (177). Though Young has recently changed his position for one of support, the members of Wikileaks’ Advisory Board confirm Young’s original suspicions. One of these members is security expert (and Wikileaks security designer) Ben Laurie (178), who is currently working on several projects for Google (179). 
Google’s links to the intelligence community are vast; the internet giant has a security agreement with the NSA (180), the electronic surveillance organization responsible for spying on millions of Americans (181), a partnership with the CIA via its joint business venture with the agency’s investment wing, In-Q-Tel (182), in the purchase of an internet monitoring organization, Recorded Future (183), a working relationship with the Zionist Organization of America, profoundly linked to the Israeli military establishment (184), to fight anti-Semitism and ‘anti-Israel propaganda (185),’ and a disturbing research project in Tel Aviv, where Zionist founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page have major ties, to delve into the aspects of the human genome and genetic data-mining (186). The Google ties alone are enough to discredit and expose the entire Wikileaks operation.
Wikileaks is being heavily funded by Mossad and corrosive, criminal Zionist billionaire George Soros, and is also directly involved with a $20 million CIA operation involving Chinese ‘dissidents’ trained by the agency to hack into China’s computers and reroute the implanted viruses to American government computer systems, all for the purpose of increasing the cyber defense budget (187), a plan that began when dual-citizen of Israel and Mossad operative Amit Yoran was elected Cyber Security Czar by war criminal George W. Bush in 2003 (188). Amit Yoran and his family were a key part of the Mossad false attack on September 11th (189); just one more example of more than 60 years of Israeli espionage against the United States, including cyber warfare (190). Some of these ‘dissidents’ are Wang Dan, Xiao Qiang, and Wang Youcai, all members of Wikileaks’ Advisory Board. This operation is an extension of the CIA’s ‘Operation Yellowbird,’ an earlier scheme in which the CIA supported the subversive activities of ‘pro-democracy’ Chinese citizens and rescued them from prosecution at the hands of the Chinese government (191). 
Is there any mention of this CIA sabotage against China in any of the Cablegate documents? Obviously not. What about Zionist spying? Nowhere to be found. Instead, predictably, there are cables blaming China for espionage against the United States and Google (192); considering the security connections of Google with CIA, NSA and the Israeli military, this is beyond asinine. It is clear, that this is just more damage control to completely cover up the CIA-Wikileaks operation.

Another member of Wikileaks’ Advisory board is Tashi Namgyal Khamsitsang, former representative of the Dalai Lama and president of the Tibetan Association of Washington (193). George Soros is a major financial contributor to the Dalai Lama (194), the ‘spiritual’ leader of the Tibetan ‘struggle for independence.’ The Soros-founded International Crisis Group vociferously promotes the Tibetan cause, spreading falsehoods about Chinese ethnic cleansing and other concocted crimes against humanity (195). This is another Zionist-engineered farce to distract the masses from the real struggles of Palestine, Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Yemen and Pakistan. The Tibetan freedom movement has been funded by the CIA for decades through its National Endowment For Democracy (NED) to weaken China’s social fabric; NED was used by the agency to provide millions per year to its Asian clients, including $180,000.00 per year for the Dalai Lama himself (196). NED is an integral part of none other than the CIA’s Operation Yellowbird (197). Any mention in the Cablegate documents of the CIA’s subversive connections to Tibet? Absolutely not; but there is plenty of sewage about China oppressing Tibet and restricting the Dalai Lama’s movements (198).
The remaining members of Wikileaks’ Advisory Board are Phillip Adams and Francisco ‘Chico’ Whitaker Ferreira. Adams is a columnist for The Australian (199), a newspaper owned by News Corporation (200), the media conglomerate of infamous Zionist billionaire, Keith Rupert Murdoch, who recently accepted an award from the Zionist propaganda arm, the Anti-Defamation League (201). Ferreira worked as a researcher and consultant with UNESCO, and is currently a member of the World Future Council (202). The World Future Council is an organization dedicated to globalization via the strengthening of the UN, and it is a frequenter of the supranational organization’s conventions on environmental issues (203). The World Future Council has also worked extensively with the Zionist European Union, contributing several points to its Directive on renewable energy (204), an unabashed promotion of the ‘global warming’ agenda which has been thoroughly debunked as a scientific hoax (205). 
UNESCO is the criminal United Nations organization that has been complicit in the anarchic corruption that has destroyed Iraq’s once flourishing educational system (206), and the group that has overseen the looting of Iraq’s most precious artifacts, antiquities and ancient books, which it attributes to ‘professionals (207).’ These professionals are none other than the agents of Mossad, who have looted Iraq’s precious artifacts from Baghdad to Mosul to Najaf (208), and UNESCO has watched Israel’s intelligence apparatus steal Iraq’s priceless history without making a peep about Zion’s crimes. This isn’t surprising however, as UNESCO has a partnership with L’Oreal, in which the supranational wing and cosmetics giant issue 5 ‘For Women In Science’ awards every year (209). L’Oreal is a massive contributor to the illegitimate Zionist state, and has set up its commercial center of the Middle East in Israel, it has been praised by the American Jewish Committee and the ADL, it has accepted awards from mass murderer Benjamin Netanyahu and has given out scholarships worth $10,000.00 to Israeli students (210). It is utter Zionist collusion on the part of UNESCO, which of course, has never been acknowledged by Wikileaks.
The questions are just begging to be asked. What kind of whistleblower organization takes money from Mossad and CIA? And what kind of whistleblower organization’s advisory board is comprised of CIA agents, CIA assets, Zionist journalists and globalists? And if such an organization takes such blood money, and is comprised of such personalities, it really isn’t all that’s cracked up to be, now is it? And it actually is what it sounds like: an intelligence front.
The most devastating blow to Wikileaks’ whistleblower aura is the revelation that it is using PROMIS software to filter the information it attains before its world-renowned leaks (211). PROMIS was created by the INSLAW corporation, owned by former NSA agent, Bill Hamilton. Though Hamilton’s intention was to transfer the license of his revolutionary software to the United States government, PROMIS was stolen by officials from war criminal Ronald Reagan’s Justice Department and handed over to the CIA and the NSA, who re-formatted the technology to use it in global espionage operations (212). There is not an organization on planet earth with access to PROMIS software, that isn’t connected to the CIA or a proxy of the CIA. It is the final shot from the cannon, shattering every piece of Wikileaks’ armor.
Obama’s Regulation Czar, obnoxious Zionist Cass Sunstein, has called for government infiltration of all groups that propose historical revisionism and ‘conspiracy theories (213).’ With Wikileaks’ vast connections to the CIA, and its glamorous image in the anti-war movement, it is clear that Assange’s group is a reflection of Sunstein’s Orwellian vision. Wikileaks is COINTELPRO 2.0, cyber edition.

 

Julian Assange has been bought and paid for by Israel.

 

Assange: Darling of The Zionist Elite
One wonders how documents that were written by Zionist diplomats, filtered with CIA software and vigorously promoted by the Zionist media can be so adamantly accepted as unequivocal truth by those associated with anti-war sentiments and anti-Zionism. One wonders how such individuals can discard their logic, principles and dignity so easily. And one wonders what force is preventing them from regaining their senses. Every group needs a polarizing and charismatic leader to guide them and nurture them. In the case of the successfully coopted anti-war movement, that leader is 39-year old hacker and ‘whistle-blower’ extraordinaire, Julian Assange from Queensland, Australia. 
While Assange has been depicted by the Zionist media as a renegade on the run from Interpol in a high-octane Hollywood action thriller, a voice of the people and a hero to be worshiped by men and women alike, an examination of the record serves as a fan to blow the Zionist smokescreen right into the abyss and expose the man behind Zion’s mask. Though the mainstream press continues to say that Assange was arrested in the UK for ‘sex crimes’ committed in Sweden, this is a fallacy; Assange willingly met with UK police on his lawyer’s advice (214). Interpol’s infamous ‘red notice’ that it posted on Assange was never needed (215), because despite media reports of Assange living his life in hiding, the UK police knew exactly where he was for 30 days (216). As the circus of Assange’s rape/molestation charges chugs on with vigor, the Zionist media deliberately (and conveniently) left out the fact that Sweden’s rape charges against Assange were dropped already back in August (217). Interpol, an international police cooperation outfit, is known for apprehending criminals of all sorts from pole to pole across the earth; if the intent was to incarcerate and silence Assange, why wasn’t he picked up at the internationally covered press conference he gave in Geneva in November of this year (218)? 
The lawyer that instructed Julian Assange to turn himself in was Mark Stephens, of Finers Stephens Innocent, the London legal heavyweight. Mark Stephens is an ardent Zionist who defended Yoram Blachar, the former head of the Israeli Medical Association, an organization known for its doctors engaging in the horrific torture of Palestinians (219). On behalf of Blacher, Mark Stephens filed a libel suit against Dr. Derek Summerfield, a UK-based physician who repeatedly blasted Blachar and his complicity with the Zionist entity’s crimes against humanity (220). 
Stephens has also defended several Zionist media outlets (221), including CNN, headed by CEO Jeffrey Bewkes, a staunch Zionist who has been honored by notorious Zionist institutions the American Jewish Committee and the Simon Wiesenthal Center (222), ABC, headed by CEO Robert Iger, who has been honored by the extremist Zionist organization, Aish HaTorah (223), the New York Times, known for its disgustingly pro-Israel bias in all of its reporting on the Middle East (224), as well as the Wall Street Journal (225), owned by ultra-Zionist Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation. Finers Stephens Innocent serves as a legal advisor for Waddesdon Manor, owned by the godfathers of Israel, the Rothschild banking family, which explains why Mark Stephens is also a Freeman of the City of London (226), the financial district of London which governs all major financial happenings across the globe and is dominated by the Rothschild clan (227). 
Julian Assange has his own disturbing connections to the Zionist Rothschild dynasty. In 2008, Assange accepted the ‘Economist Index On Censorship Award’ from The Economist Magazine (228). The Economist is part of the Economist Group, a media corporation which is 50% owned by the Zionist Rothschilds (229). In addition, Assange is an ‘absolute’ proponent of Zionist-designed free market capitalism, declaring in a recent Forbes interview that he ‘loves markets,’ and that Wikileaks was designed for the benefit of capitalism (230). Free market capitalism is the repugnant capitalist ideology of Milton Friedman, whom many consider to be Adam Smith reborn (231). Milton Friedman was a dual-citizen of Israel, he issued many lectures at Zionist universities built on occupied Palestinian land, he atrociously considered the illegitimate Zionist state a ‘beautiful and diversified country, with enemies on all sides,’ he donated regularly to the Israel Center for Social and Economic Progress, a Zionist ‘charity,’ and was a friend to Israeli war criminals Menachem Begin, Shimon Peres and Ariel Sharon (232). 
During the transition of being ‘on the run from the law’ and turning himself in to the law, Julian Assange wrote an editorial for The Australian, the Zionist-owned newspaper where his fellow Wikileaks board member Phillip Adams is a stalwart. The very concept of writing an editorial for a Zionist-owned newspaper while supposedly on the run from international intelligence agents should have been a wake-up call for every activist who accepts Wikileaks as truth, that Assange and Wikileaks are nothing but a sideshow; unfortunately, this didn’t open their eyes to the ‘dancing bears’ either. In Assange’s editorial, he remarkably declared that he isn’t anti-war, and what is even more opprobrious, he glorified Zionist billionaire Rupert Murdoch, and his elitist father, Keith Murdoch, citing them as sources of journalistic integrity and truth, and then comparing Wikileaks’ efforts to those of the Murdoch family (233). Rupert Murdoch is anything but a source of truth; he has dedicated billions upon billions of dollars to spreading disinformation, sensationalism and outright lies with his Fox News Network to unabashedly condone the illegal Zionist wars in occupied Iraq and Afghanistan (234); his promotion of the genocidal invasion of Iraq was in such a great amount, that it was called ‘Mr. Murdoch’s war (235).’ In that case then, Assange’s comparison is quite accurate, since Wikileaks does nothing but promote Zionist distortion. 
The more despicable, and most certainly more collusive of Assange’s praises, is that of the originator of the ‘war on terror,’ Zionist war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu. In an interview with Bewkes-owned TIME Magazine, Assange called Netanyahu a ‘sophisticated politician,’ and used the butcher of Gaza as an example of a world leader who respects the leaks of his organization, and even went on to say that Netanyahu believes Wikileaks will lead to ‘an increase in the peace process in the Middle East and particularly in relation to Iran,’ and most damningly, admitting that Cablegate was in the interest of Israel (236). It is not coincidental at all, that the two Zionist objects of Julian Assange’s praise are quite good friends; Netanyahu stays at Rupert Murdoch’s estate when the war criminal is in London (237).
What kind of whistle-blower gives his leaks to Zionist-owned, corporate, elitist newspapers and then writes an editorial for one? What kind of hero of the oppressed people hires a Zionist lawyer that defends the torture of Palestinians and the institutions that cover it up? What kind of freedom fighter accepts an award from the Rothschild family, one of the greatest causes of the destruction of peace and justice throughout the world? What kind of revolutionary is inspired by Zionist liars like the Murdoch family and offers his praise to filthy war criminals like Benjamin Netanyahu? What kind of champion of the people subscribes to Zionist-created free market capitalism and admits that his organization was created to nonsensically make an anti-freedom and anti-ethics ideology more ‘free and ethical?’ What kind of defender of truth mentions Iran’s nuclear program as if it was a threat to ‘peace’ while totally ignoring hundreds of Israeli nukes? Julian Assange is none of these things; and to label him as such, is an insult to those righteous persons who are. Julian Assange is a Zionist shill, bought and paid for by the Israel-first elite, Mossad and the CIA, planted in the activism community as the front man for the new generation of COINTELPRO.

 

Resistance and Knowledge will trigger Revolution; not Wikileaks.

 

Conclusion: Real Heroes and Real Leaks
A final note needs to be made about some recent allegations in Arabic media regarding secret videos and recordings of Julian Assange taking money from Israeli officials and cutting a deal with the Zionist entity to protect it from Wikileaks’ document dumps (238). While it is indeed true that Assange has certainly taken money from Israeli intelligence, this theory implies that Wikileaks wasn’t always a corrupt organization; that the intentions of Wikileaks were once pure. This is a terribly false narrative that makes Assange and company look like victims bullied by the Zionist entity. Assange and his crew are assets of Israel, not enemies turned friends.
It is already an established fact that Assange has been taking money from Mossad, CIA and Zionist George Soros from the very beginning; before Wikileaks even became an internationally renowned ‘whistle-blower,’ the Zionist media was treating it as such, with Assange’s organization being touted by Zionist-owned TIME Magazine and the propaganda-spewing Washington Post (239). Wikileaks’ first official leak was a despicable pack of lies against the Somali Resistance (240), fighting vehemently against the Zionist-instigated, US-backed United Nations-African Union occupation of their country (241). Every leak thereafter didn’t harm Israel either; this shows solidarity with the illegitimate usurping regime from the jump, not a case of flip-flopping and turn-coating. In addition, Julian Assange has admitted to having connections to Australian intelligence (242), which has been reporting first to Mossad for decades, including, not so ironically, in the case of true whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu, tipping the Israeli intelligence agency off prior to his kidnaping (243). 
The very fact that Assange has given all of his documents to Zionist-owned elitist media outlets should have been enough to raise a red flag with anyone and everyone pursing truth, peace and justice. Instead, like sheep, Wikileaks’ followers are being led right to slaughter. Just like the sinking of the Lusitania was the false flag for World War One, Pearl Harbor was the false flag for World War Two, the Gulf of Tonkin was the false flag for Vietnam and 9/11 was the false flag for Zionism’s current hegemonic onslaught against the Middle East, Wikileaks is the Zionist-created false flag that is being used right now, at this very moment, to usher in an all-out assault on the internet, with Zionist war criminal Joseph Lieberman leading the way with the first shot: new legislation that is being called ‘Patriot Act for the internet (244).’
A real leak is one that doesn’t serve the Zionist agenda; a real hero is one that fights against Zionism and exposes it with reckless abandon, only concerned with the truth.
No mention in the Zionist media is the leak of the names, ranks, photos and addresses of 200 Israeli war criminals that participated in the genocide of Operation Cast Lead against occupied Gaza in 2008-09 (245). 
No mention in the Zionist media is the leak initiated by former IOF soldier Anat Kam, who delivered 2,000 classified military files that detailed war crimes (including targeted assassinations) committed in the occupied West Bank to Haaretz journalist Uri Blau (246). An Israeli gag order was put on the whole affair (247), and Anat Kam remains on house arrest, awaiting a life imprisonment sentence for ‘treason’ against the Israeli regime (248).
Unless it is part of a smear campaign, there is no mention in the Zionist media of the undeniably true statements of courageous former White House press core reporter Helen Thomas, who said that Zionists own Congress, the White House, Hollywood, Wall Street and American foreign policy (249). Instead of dissecting the evidence, there are only pathetic accusations of anti-Semitism. 
Never mentioned in the rotten Zionist media is Gary Webb, the brave investigative journalist that completely exposed the CIA drug trafficking operation to pump cocaine into African-American communities in Los Angeles (250). Contrary to ridiculous media reports of Gary Webb committing suicide by shooting himself in the head twice, he was assassinated by the CIA for bringing the agency’s racist criminality to light (251). 
Never mentioned by the Zionist-owned media machine is the tragic story of another noble investigative reporter, Danny Casolaro, who unearthed an international conspiracy centered around the theft of the aforementioned PROMIS software of the INSLAW corporation, with the butcher of Iraq, Zionist war criminal George H.W. Bush sitting at the head, shadowing the affair through his secretive criminal society known as the Black Rose; Casolaro was snuffed out in brutal fashion by the very same criminals he exposed (252).
No mention in the Zionist-controlled press is the meticulous and shocking research of Edward Hooper, who wrote a nearly-1,200-page investigative masterpiece undeniably destroying mainstream AIDS theory and uncovering that it was actually created by a Zionist scientist named Hillary Koprowski, who gave contaminated, mutated dosages of Oral Polio Vaccine to more than a quarter of a million Congolese youth after being commissioned by the United States government to do so (253).
Never in the Zionist media are the veracious efforts of Cathy O’Brien and Mark Phillips mentioned, who blew the whistle on the barbaric CIA mind control programs of Project Monarch and MKULTRA, which brought to light the unbearably twisted criminal behavior of the highest echelons of various governments (254).
Never mentioned by the Zionist media is Sibel Edmonds, the Turkish-American FBI translator turned whistle-blower that exposed varying degrees of spying within the US government, including significant revelations about collusion between the Turkish military, Israeli military intelligence, AIPAC and the neo-conservative Zionist Power Configuration governing America’s foreign policy (255). 
And never is it mentioned, nor will it ever be mentioned by the Zionist media the name of Milton William Cooper, better known as Bill Cooper, the writer, shortwave radio broadcaster, researcher and activist that exposed every degree of the international conspiracy dominating the world today (256), including a brilliant expose of the vile history of the Anti-Defamation League (257). On June 28th, 2001, during his nightly ‘Hour Of The Time’ broadcast, which can be heard on various outlets across the web, Bill Cooper predicted that a false flag attack was to be carried out in New York City in the coming months, and it would be blamed on Osama Bin Laden to initiate the next phase of globalization, or the ‘New World Order.’ In November of 2001, just months after his chilling prediction, Bill Cooper was murdered outside of his home.
These men and women, along with the previously discussed Mordechai Vanunu and Robert Friedman, are real whistle-blowers; real journalists; real activists; and in several cases, real heroes. Their sacrifice, along with the sacrifice and efforts of giants like Malcolm X, Patrice Lumumba, Salvador Allende, Fela Kuti, Omar Mukhtar, Mehdi Ben Barka, Che Guevara, General Abdul Karim Qasem, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, Fred Hampton and Ayatollah Sayyed Ruhollah Khomeini should be studied and drawn upon for light, strength, inspiration and guidance in the revolutionary struggle for peace, truth, freedom and justice for all oppressed people. The Zionist media can keep Julian Assange and the rest of its intelligence-connected, manufactured frauds.
It must never be forgotten (and constantly reiterated) that Assange despicably stated that he is annoyed by ‘false conspiracies such as 9/11 (258),’ although there is overwhelming evidence that there was a massive cover-up to hide the fact that the towers were demolished from the inside with explosives (259), and that there were Mossad agents and high-ranking sayanim of the Zionist entity at every post to carry out the intricacies of the famed false flag attack (260). Like Bin Laden, who was in a US hospital meeting with CIA officials only two months before the 9/11 attacks (261), Julian Assange was a guest at a cocktail party at a US embassy nearly a year ago (262). Revelations will continue to surface about Assange’s deception and his connections to the usurping, occupying Tel Aviv regime while the Zionist media simultaneously lies to the public about his heroism in the typical, perfect language of the Hegelian Dialectic. Do not fall for the trick. Wikileaks is Zionist poison. This is the deconstruction of the myth that says it is anything but.
~ The End~
Sources:
(1) Obama And The Jews by Pauline Dubkin Yearwood, Chicago Jewish News
(2) Obama Pledges ‘Unshakeable Commitment’ To Israel’s Security by Jonathan D. Salant, Bloomberg
(3) Obama’s Gaza Silence Condemned by Al-Jazeera
(4) A Day Of Terror: The Israelis; Spilled Blood Is Seen As Bond That Draws 2 Nations Closer by James Bennet, The New York Times
(5) Conflict With Iraq – An Israeli Perspective by Benjamin Netanyahu
(6) Netanyahu: 9/11 Attacks Good For Israel by Al-Manar; Report: Netanyahu Says 9/11 Terror Attacks Good For Israel by Haaretz and Reuters
(7) Netanyahu To US Jews: Direct Mideast Talks Will Begin Very Soon by Natasha Mozgovaya and Barak Ravid, Haaretz
(8) Netanyahu: Israel Won’t Be Center Of Wikileaks Release by Ma’an News Agency
(9) Israel ‘Satisfied’ As Wikileaks Shows Consistency On Iran by Ma’an News Agency
(10) Video: The Wiki (Israel) Leaks by Russia Today
(11) Israel Greets Wikileaks As Vindication Of Its Iran Policy by Joshua Mitnick, The Christian Science Monitor
(12) The World Thinks Like Us by Sever Plocker, Ynet News
(13) Wikileaks Expose: Israel Tried To Coordinate Gaza War With Abbas by Barak Ravid, Haaretz
(14) Yemen Cable Gives Al-Qaeda New ‘Recruiting’ Tool by Michael Isikoff, MSNBC
(15) The (Not So) Secret War U.S. War In Pakistan by Jeremy Scahill, CBS News
(16) Lebanon ‘Gave Israeli Army Tips’ by Al-Jazeera
(17) U.S. Flew Spy Missions Over Lebanon: Leaked Cable by Dominic Evans, Reuters
(18) Cable 09TELAVIV1098, Israel, A Promised Land For Organized Crime? by Wikileaks
(19) Israel, PA Deepen Security Cooperation by The Jerusalem Post
(20) Hamas Slams Abbas’s Confession To His Security Coordination With Israel by The Palestinian Information Center
(21) Israel Confirms Arms Shipment Sent To Aid Abbas by Steve Erlanger, The New York Times
(22) Israel Restores Financial Ties To Palestinian Authority by Steve Erlanger, The New York Times
(23) Background Note: Yemen by U.S. Department of State 
(24) Middle East: Yemen by USAID
(25) In Yemen, US Faces Leader Who Puts Family First by Steve Erlanger, The New York Times
(26) The Yemen Hidden Agenda: Behind The Al-Qaeda Scenarios, A Strategic Oil Transit Chokepoint by F. William Engdahl, Global Research
(27) US Bombs Yemen, Kills 120, Just Another Day In The Life Of An Empire by Robert Taylor, The San Francisco Examiner
(28) Lieberman: Yemen Will Be ‘Tomorrow’s War’ If Preemptive Action Not Taken by Jordan Fabian, The Hill
(29) The Yemen Brief: Expanding Scope Of US Military Engagement Exactly What Bin Laden Wants by Steve Clemons, Talking Points Memo
(30) President Saleh Denies US Military Presence In Yemen by Yemen News Agency 
(31) US To Boost Military Presence In Yemen by Press TV
(32) ‘US, Israel Behind Yemen Bombing’ by Press TV
(33) The CIA’s Silent War In Pakistan by Bobby Ghosh and Mark Thompson, TIME Magazine
(34) Pakistan Allowing CIA To Use Airbase For Drone Strikes by Amanda Hodge, The Australian
(35) Pakistan: Over 700 Civilians Killed In US Drone Strikes by Dawn News
(36) Unauthorized US Strike Kills 5 Pakistanis by Press TV
(37) U.S. Special Forces Strike In Pakistan by Farhan Bokhari, Sami Yousafzai and Tucker Reals, CBS News; US Forces ‘Violate’ Pakistan Territory With Attack On Taliban by The Telegraph 
(38) Soldier Deaths Draw Focus To US In Pakistan by Jane Perlez, The New York Times
(39) India And Israel: A Wrong Alliance Part One by Shahul Hameed, Ovi Magazine
(40) Mossad And India Spy Agency Team Up, Target Pakistan by Tariq Saeedi, Globe Intel
(41) Mossad-RAW Nexus by S.M. Hali, Pakistan Daily
(42) Blackwater/Xe Attacks In Pakistan by The Daily Mail
(43) Peshawar Police Chief Claims RAW, Mossad Behind The Killing Of Three Chinese by Andhra News
(44) Pakistan Car Bomb Toll Passes 100 by BBC News
(45) Local Reactions On Sayyed Nasrallah’s Speech In Martyrs Day by Al-Manar
(46) Murr Denies Wikileaks’ Allegations by Ahram Online
(47) Why Hezbollah’s Victory May Lead To Peace In The Middle East: Interview With Franklin Lamb by Mike Whitney, Global Research
(48) Iran Shoots Down U.S. Spy Drone Amid Growing Military Pressure by Liang Youchang, Xinhua English; Diego Garcia: Iran Attack Mystery Deepens by Rob Edwards, Herald Scotland
(49) Diego Garcia, Swept Clean And Sanitized by Deanna Spingnola, News With Views
(50) Hizbullah Secretary General: Lebanon, ALL Of Lebanon, Will Not Tolerate Any Violation Of Its Sacred Land by Nour Rida, Moqawama English
(51) Lebanon Submits UN Protest Over ‘Israeli Spies’ by The Telegraph
(52) ‘Israeli Spies Used Alfa In 33-Day War’ by Press TV
(53) The Hariri Assassination: Israel’s Fingerprints by Rannie Amiri, Global Research
(54) ‘Israel Benefitted Rafiq Hariri Murder’ by Press TV
(55) U.S. Pledges 10 Million For UN-Backed Lebanon Tribunal by Reuters
(56) Britain To Give A Further $1.6 Million To Lebanon Tribunal Investigating Hariri Murder by The Associated Press
(57) ‘Israel Aided US-Backed Hariri Tribunal’ by Press TV
(58) ‘Tribunal Is Israel’s 6th War On Lebanon:’ Interview With Franklin Lamb by Press TV
(59) Nasrallah: Boycott U.N. Tribunal by CBN News
(60) Sayyed Nasrallah: Days When You Could Threaten Us Are Over by Mohamad Shmaysani, Al-Manar
(61) Hezbollah Discovers Israeli Spy Devices by Press TV
(62) Instant Greater Israel – Just Add Water by Damian Lataan, The People’s Voice
(63) Israeli ‘Mafia’ Boss Assassinated by Paul Wood, BBC News
(64) Israeli Faces U.S. Drug Charges by The Orlando Sentinel
(65) Police In Israel Grapple With A Mafia Gang War by Ashraf Khalil, The Los Angeles Times
(66) Blood And Volume: Inside New York’s Israeli Mafia by Dave Copeland
(67) Olmert’s 9/11 Mafia by Barry Chamish
(68) PM To Face Criminal Investigation Over Bank Leumi Sale Affair by Yuval Yoaz, Haaretz
(69) US Groups Buys 9.99% of Bank Leumi by Yigal Grayeff, The Jerusalem Post
(70) What Do Susan Sarandon, Alan Dershowitz And The Russian Mob Have In Common? by Richard Silverstein, Tikun Olam
(71) Red Mafiya: How The Russian Mob Has Invaded America by Robert Friedman (rip)
(72) Mogilevich Indicted In Pennsylvania For Racketeering, Money Laundering by US-Russia Press Club 
(73) The Billion Dollar Don (documentary) by BBC News
(74) The Russian-Israeli Mafia: Off-Limits To FBI, US Intelligence by Wayne Madsen
(75) The Best Investigative Reporter You’ve Never Heard Of by Sherry Ricchiardi, American Journalism Review
(76) Inconvenient Truth: Robert Friedman, Investigate Journalist by Dan Bischoff, The Village Voice
(77) The Judeo-Russian Mafia: From The Gulag To Brooklyn To World Dominion by M. Raphael Johnson, PH.D.
(78) Limited Hang Out: Illusions Of Incompetence Theories And Intelligence Failures To Cover Up Scandals by Oil Empire
(79) Spy Chief: Simon Talks With Former Mossad Head by David Kohn, CBS News
(80) Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(81) Wikileaks: US Hits Back At Israel by Wayne Madsen
(82) At Least One Wikileak Is Just A Bold-Faced Lie – And It’s a Significant One by Scott Creighton
(83) Cable 05TELAVIV1580: Mossad Chief To Codel Corzine: Some Foreign by Wikileaks
(84) Kashmir Shows Up In Wikileaks by Greater Kashmir
(85) Cable 07TELAVIV2652, U/S Burns’ August 17th Meeting With Israeli Mossad by Wikileaks
(86) Wikileaks: Ayatollah Khamenei Has Terminal Cancer by Damien McElroy, The Telegraph
(87) Wikileaks: Israel Weapons Manufacturer Listed As Site Vital To US Interests by Barak Ravid, Haaretz
(88) Cable 09TELAVIV2482: Assistant Secretary Of Defense Vershbow Meets With by Wikileaks
(89) Wikileaks Cables: Lockerbie Bomber Freed After Gaddafi’s ‘Thuggish’ Threats by David Leigh, The Guardian
(90) IDC: IOF Used Palestinian Children As Human Shields On 15 Occasions by The Palestinian Information Center
(91) Israeli Soldiers Demoted Over Crimes by Press TV
(92) Israel’s Fabricated Rocket Crisis by Jim Holstun and Joanna Tinker, The Electronic Intifada
(93) Israel Broke Ceasfire by Killing Six by David Morrison, The Irish Times
(94) The Invasion Of Gaza: ‘Operation Cast Lead,’ Part Of A Broader Israeli Military-Intelligence Agenda by Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research
(95) Iran’s Belligerent Actions by Jaclyn Schiff, CBS News
(96) Report: Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei Dead by National Terror Alert Response Center News
(97) Khamenei Said To Be In A Coma by Michael Ledeen, Pajamas Media
(98) Veteran Neo-Con Advisor Moves On Iran by Jim Lobe, The Asia Times
(99) Iran Connects The Dots by Michael Ledeen, The National Review
(100) Ho Hum, More Wikileaks ‘Chickenfeed’ by Gordon Duff, Veterans Today
(101) Iran And The ‘Zionist Pranks’ by Rehmat’s World
(102) Lebanon PM: It Was Wrong To Accuse Syria Of Assassinating Rafiq al-Hariri by Ian Black, The Guardian 
(103) Sayyed Nasrallah: Israel Behind Hariri’s Assassination by Hussein Assi, Al-Manar
(104) The Bleeding Vale Of Kashmir by Brigadier General Asif Haroon Raja
(105) Mass Graves In Kashmir by Fatima Sultan Syed
(106) Shadows In Kashmir Torture Cells Longer Than Abu Ghraib by The Milli Gazette
(107) Wikileaks Vindicates India’s Terror Charge Of ISI Terror Network by The Economic Times
(108) India Is Not Concerned About Wikileaks: Krishna by Akbar Majid, MeriNews
(109) India Is Not Embarrassed By Any Wikileaks’ Revelations by Sulekha News
(110) Israel And India: Brothers In Occupation Of Kashmir by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(111) Freeman: Israel Is Useless To US Power Projection by Chas Freeman, Mondoweiss
(112) The High Priests Of War by Michael Collins Piper
(113) The Zionist Murderers Of Iraq by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(114) America’s S.O.S. To The IDF by Amir Oren, Haaretz
(115) The Baghdad Cathedral Massacre: Zionist Fingerprints All Over by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(116) The Other Side Of Deception: A Rogue Agent Exposes The Mossad’s Secret Agenda by Victor Ostrovsky
(117) 7/7 Ripple Effect (documentary) by John Hill
(118) Lockerbie Was Mossad ‘False Flag’ Operation by Rehmat’s World
(119) Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi by INNOCENT
(120) Deception Over Lockerbie by Maidhc O Cathail
(121) The Reality Of Zionism by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(122) Turkey’s Intel Severs Ties With Mossad by UPI
(123) Turkey Decides To Cancel Three Military Exercises With Israel by Xinhua English
(124) Ahmet Davutoglu: ‘We Are A Part Of The West’ by Newsweek
(125) Turkey Defends Hezbollah Against STL by Press TV
(126) Erdogan: Israel To Lose Closest Ally by The Jerusalem Post 
(127) Israeli Mossad Accused Of Attempting To Assassinate Erdogan by The European Union Times
(128) Turkish PM Reiterates Demand For Israel’s Apology, Compensation by Xinhua English
(129) Why We Need Turkey by Zvi Bar’el, Haaretz
(130) Turkey To Normalize Ties If Gaza Blockade Ends by Reuters
(131) Erdogan’s Visit To Lebanon And Calling On Israel To Apologize And Halt The Inflammatory by Mohamed Abd el Fattah, All Voices
(132) Erdogan Denies Genocide, Links Karabakh To Armenia Ties On Prime Time TV by Asbarez Armenian News
(133) Erdogan Accuses Armenians Of ‘Exterminating’ Turks by Asbarez Armenian News
(134) The Armenian Genocide: 90 Years Later Turkey Continues To Deny The Extermination Of A People by DemocracyNow!
(135) ADL’s Abe Foxman Disputes Criticism On Armenian Genocide Position by Armen Carapetian, Armenian National Committee
(136) Palmerston Launches Young Turks To Permanently Control Middle East by Joseph Brewda, The Schiller Institute
(137) When Kemal Ataturk Recited Shema Yisrael by Hillel Halkin, The Jewish Daily Forward
(138) Turkey’s Charismatic Pro-Islamic Leader by BBC News
(139) Armenians Protest Erdogan’s Visit: We Haven’t Forgotten Yet by Al-Manar
(140) Wikileaks Release To Show NATO Ally Turkey Helped Al Qaeda In Iraq by Reuters
(141) Turkey’s Erdogan Slams Wikileaks Cables As Slander by Ayla Jean Yackley, Reuters
(142) The Power Of Nightmares: The Rise Of The Politics Of Fear (documentary) by BBC News
(143) Facing Fires, Israel Appeals For Help by Ethan Bronner, The New York Times
(144) Official Says Israel, Turkey In Talks To Mend Ties by The Associated Press
(145) J’lem, Turkey May Find Resolution To Flotilla Legal Issues by Herb Keinon, The Jerusalem Post; Israel Likely To Offer Heavy ‘Humanitarian’ Compensation Over Turkey Flotilla Deaths by Barak Ravid, Haaretz
(146) Turkish Official: Israel Initiated Massive Leak by Ynet News
(147) Mossad, MI6, The CIA And The Case Of The Assassinated Scientist by Yossi Melman, The Independent
(148) Netanyahu: Wikileaks Cables Prove Israel Is Right On Iran by Barak Ravid, Haaretz
(149) Gulf States Discuss Iran Following Wikileaks Revelations by David Miller, The Jerusalem Post
(150) Cable 09ASHGABAT757: Iran Post-Election: [Source Removed] Calls by Wikileaks
(151) Wikileaks’ ‘Cablegate’ Dump: 10 Biggest Revelations by The Week
(152) Cable 09ASHGABAT218: Turkmenistan/Iran: Weapons Found Hidden In Iranian by Wikileaks
(153) Wikileaks ‘Cablegate’ Shows How Iran Troubles The World by Samyuktha Krishnappa, International Business Times; Wikileaks Reveals Nuclear Secrets Of Both NATO and Iran by The Associated Press
(154) Wikileaks Cablegate: Iran Saw Pakistan As A Nuclear-Weapons Competitor Says Lavrov by Frontier India
(155) Ahmadinejad Congratulated On His Landslide Victory by Al-Manar; Iranian Elections: The ‘Stolen Elections’ Hoax by Professor James Petras, Global Research
(156) Demonizing Iranian Democracy by Dr. Elias Akleh, The People’s Voice; US Likely Source Of Interference In Iran’s Election by John Chuckman
(157) You Provide The Tweets, We’ll Provide The Info War – The Iranian Protests And The Mainstream Media by Jack Z. Bratich 
(158) Facebook, Twitter, Israel’s New Battle Ground by Press TV
(159) The Myth Of A Shia/Sunni-Persian-Arab Confrontation by Arshin Adib-Moghaddam, Antiwar.com
(160) Sayyed Nasrallah’s Speech Gave Momentum To Saudi-Syrian Efforts by Ahlul Bayt News Agency
(161) Wikileaks Claims Are ‘Psychological Warfare’ Says Ahmadinejad by Ian Black, The Guardian
(162) Wikileaks Seek To Create Discord In The Region by Iran Review
(163) ‘Wikileaks Unable To Shake Iran Ties’ by Press TV
(164) U.S. Announces New Iran Sanctions by Borzou Daragahi, The Los Angeles Times
(165) Time: Mossad Behind Iran Hit? By Press TV
(166) Playing The Never Again Card, Again by Jeff Gates, Veterans Today
(167) The Impotence Of The Pan-Semitic Front by Jeffrey Goldberg, The Atlantic
(168) Wikileaks Builds Case Against Iran by David Frum, CNN
(169) Much Ado About Nothing? – The Anti-Empire Report by William Blum
(170) Jundullah’s Links To Al Qaeda And The CIA by Aangirfan
(171) Hezbollah Spices Up Israel-Iran Mix by Kaveh L. Afrasiabi, The Asia Times
(172) Iranian Nuclear Scientist ‘Assassinated By Mossad’ by Sarah Baxter, The Sunday Times
(173) ‘Iran Skyjacking Plot Launched In Israel’ by Press TV
(174) Security Experts Suggest That Stuxnet Originated In Israel by Zero Hedge
(175) US, Israel Behind Cyber Attack On Iran? by Press TV; Stuxnet Virus Traced To Israel: ‘Everything Before Was Kid’s Stuff’ by The World Tribune
(176) Former Pakistani General: CIA, Mossad Behind Wikileaks Reports by Fars News Agency
(177) Click And Dagger: Inside Wikileaks’ Leak Factory by David Kushner, Mother Jones
(178) Exposed: Wikileaks’ Secrets by Annabel Symington, Wired
(179) Ben Laurie, Google by Dave Birch, Digital Identity Blog
(180) Google To Enlist NSA To Help It Ward Off Cyber Attacks by Ellen Nakashima, The Washington Post
(181) The Shadow Factory: The Ultra-Secret NSA From 9/11 To The Eavesdropping On America by James Bamford
(182) About IQT: History by In-Q-Tel
(183) Exclusive: Google, CIA Invest In ‘Future’ Of Web Monitoring by Noah Shachtman, Wired
(184) Zionism’s ZOA Pushes To Make All Campus Criticism Of Israel Illegal by James M. Wall, Veterans Today
(185) ZOA Praises Google For Removing False Anti-Israel Propaganda From Google Earth’s Map Of Israel by Morton Klein, Zionist Organization of America
(186) Google – Zionist Engine Of Mind And Genetic Control by Philip Jones
(187) CIA, Mossad and Soros Behind Wikileaks by Wayne Madsen, Pakistan Daily
(188) Israelis Hold Keys To NSA/US Military Computer Networks by Christopher Bollyn
(189) The Israeli Moles Who Controlled US Defense Computers On 9/11 by Christopher Bollyn
(190) Israeli Spying: The Mother Of All Scandals by What Really Happened
(191) CIA Operations In China—Another CIA Domestic OP? by Ralph McGehee 
(192) Wikileaks: Chinese Contact Claimed Beijing Hacked Google As Part Of Coordinated Computer Sabotage Program by David Gardner, Daily Mail
(193) Local Demonstrators Turn Out For Tibetans by Haley Edwards, The Seattle Times
(194) The Dalai Lama, George Soros And You by James Boyce, Intent Blog; George Soros, Imperial Wizard by Heather Coffin, Covert Action Quarterly
(195) CrisisWatch Database: China by International Crisis Group
(196) Risky Geopolitical Game: Washington Plays ‘Tibet Roulette’ With China by F. William Engdahl, Online Journal
(197) CIA Operations In China Part III by Ralph McGehee
(198) Wikileaks Reveal China’s Attempts To Limit His Holiness’ Movements by James Dunn, The Tibet Post
(199) Columnists: Phillip Adams by The Australian
(200) Newspapers And Information Services by News Corporation
(201) Media Magnate Rupert Murdoch, Accepting ADL Award, Calls For An End Of Efforts To Isolate Israel by The Anti-Defamation League
(202) Councilor Biographies: Francisco Whitaker by The World Future Council; Chico Whitaker Ferreira (Brazil) by The Right Livelihood Award
(203) About Us: Around The Globe by The World Future Council
(204) About Us: What We Are Proud Of by The World Future Council
(205) Global Warming? Or Global Governance? (documentary) by Sovereignty International
(206) Iraq: Massive Fraud And Corruption In Higher Education by Dirk Adriaensens, Global Research; Rampant Corruption Cited In Iraq’s Education System – 2004-07-26 by Voice of America News
(207) UNESCO: Iraqi Treasures Plundered by Professionals by Pravda English
(208) Judaism Discovered by Professor Michael Hoffman; Resistance Bomb Kills Zionists Stealing Archaeological Artifacts by Al-Basrah, translated by Muhammad Abu Nasr; Israel Hopes To Colonize Parts Of Iraq As ‘Greater Israel’ by Wayne Madsen, Online Journal; Claiming Jewish Communal Property In Iraq by Michael R. Fischbach, Israel-Kurd
(209) Philanthropy: For Women In Science by L’Oreal
(210) Boycott Israel Campaign: L’Oreal by Innovative Minds
(211) Bombs, Terrorism and Manure by Gordon Duff, Veterans Today
(212) US Govt Spy Program: Main Core, PROMIS And The Shadow Government Part I by Ed Encho, Oped News
(213) Obama Staffer Wants Cognitive Infiltration Of 9/11 Conspiracy Groups by Daniel Tencer, Raw Story
(214) Assange ‘To Meet’ UK Police by Al-Jazeera English
(215) Interpol Issues ‘Red Notice’ For Arrest Of Wikileaks’ Julian Assange by Kevin Poulsen, Wired
(216) Scotland Yard ‘Will Arrest Wanted Wikileaks Boss Today’ by The Daily Mail
(217) Assange Rape Charges Dropped by Radio France Internationale; Julian Assange Rape Charges Dropped, Wikileaks Founder Cleared by The San Francisco Chronicle
(218) Julian Assange, Wikileaks, Press Conference, Geneva, Switzerland by Notepad TV
(219) Israel Medical Association Defends Torture Doctors And Cuts Ties With Israel’s Physicians For Human Rights by Tony Greenstein; Correspondence: Interferons In Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis by The Lancet
(220) Not So Innocent – Index On Censorship Trustee Seeks To Silence Campaigner Against Torture by Tony Greenstein; Two Sides Of The Argument by Index On Censorship
(221) Pop Stars To Pensioners: Everyone Needs A Lawyer by Nicola Laver, The Times
(222) Circuit: The Wizard Of Oz Honored by Michael Aushenker, Jewish Journal; Does Hollywood Give Jewish? by Brad A. Greenberg, Jewish Journal
(223) Board And Chairmen by Robert Melson, Cambridge Forecast
(224) US Media’s Pro-Israel Bias: Response To The Freedom Flotilla Slaughter by Stephen Lendman
(225) Finers Wins Landmark Libel Ruling For Wall Street Journal by Joanne Harris, The Lawyer
(226) Waddeson Trust by Charity Performance; Mark Stephens: Media Lawyer by The Times
(227) Secrets Of The Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins (rip)
(228) Julian Assange by The Centre For Investigative Journalism
(229) Let The Bad Times Roll by Stephen Brook, The Guardian
(230) An Interview With Wikileaks’ Julian Assange by Andy Greenberg, Forbes
(231) Milton Friedman, 94, Free Market Theorist, Dies by Holcomb B. Noble, The New York Times
(232) Milton Friedman And Israel by The Jerusalem Post
(233) Don’t Shoot Messenger For Revealing Uncomfortable Truths by Julian Assange, The Australian
(234) Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch’s War On Journalism (documentary) by Robert Greenwald
(235) Media: Mr. Murdoch’s War by David D. Kirkpatrick, The New York Times
(236) TIME’s Julian Assange Interview: Full Transcript/Audio by Richard Stengel, TIME Magainze
(237) Spook, Terrorist Or Criminal? America’s Mysterious Files On Netanyahu by Neve Gordon, Washington Report On Middle East Affairs
(238) Busted!! Wikileaks Struck A Deal With Israel Over Cable Leaks by Gordon Duff, Veterans Today
(239) If We Lose Our Internet Freedoms Because Of Wikileaks, You Should At Least Know Why by Scott Creighton, Global Research
(240) No Secrets: Julian Assange’s Mission For Total Transparency by Raffi Khatchadourian, The New Yorker
(241) UN/AU Continues Somali Slaughter by Thomas C. Mountain, Counter Currents
(242) FTR #724 Wiki Of The Damned by Dave Emory, Spitfire List
(243) Ex-Mossad Agent Speaks Out Tells Of The Mossad-Australia Connection by New Dawn Magazine
(244) Wikileaks: “Patriot Act” Laws For The Internet by Eric Blair, Activist Post
(245) Exposed: 200 Israeli Army Officers Suspected Of War Crimes In Gaza by Nureddin Sabir, Redress
(246) Stolen Docs Expose Israeli War Crimes by Press TV
(247) Israel’s Ongoing War Against The Press by Michael Corcoran, Truth Out
(248) Journalist Accused Of Leaking Secret IDF Documents by Ron Ben-Yishai and Vered Luvitch, Ynet News
(249) Helen Thomas Says Zionists Control U.S. Foreign Policy by The Detroit Free Press
(250) Dark Alliance: The CIA, The Contras, And The Crack Cocaine Explosion by Gary Webb (rip)
(251) Political Assassination In The US: Did The CIA Kill Gary Webb? by Kurt Nimmo, Global Research
(252) The Octopus: Secret Government And The Death Of Danny Casolaro by Kenn Thomas and Jim Keith
(253) The River: A Journey To The Source Of HIV And AIDS by Edward Hooper
(254) Trance Formation Of America by Cathy O’Brien and Mark Phillips; Access Denied: For Reasons Of National Security by Cathy O’Brien and Mark Phillips
(255) Phillip Giraldi On Sibel, Turkey, Israel, The Neocons And The MIC by Scott Horton
(256) The Hour Of Our Time: The Legacy Of William Cooper (documentary) by Ether Films
(257) Hour Of The Time Transcripts ADL Expose 1-7 by Hour of The Time
(258) Wanted By The CIA: The Man Who Keeps No Secrets by Matthew Bell, The Independent
(259) Video: New 9/11 Photos ‘Prove WTC Exploded From Inside’ by Russia Today
(260) 9/11: Israel’s Grand Deception by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion
(261) Report: Bin Laden Treated At US Hospital by Elizabeth Bryant, UPI
(262) Julian Assange Wined And Dined At US Embassy by Andrew Gilligan, The Telegraph

Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison I

October 28, 2010

Video

by Jonathan Azaziah

Source

Disinformation is defined as ‘misinformation that is deliberately disseminated in order to influence or confuse rivals.’ It is used by governments to mislead and brainwash their citizen populations, instigate wars, and blackmail foreign regimes. It is the ultimate instrument of the media. The most effective disinformation is that which is comprised of falsehood as well as facts. Wikileaks, founded by Julian Assange, fits this description perfectly, right down to the letter. Seemingly overnight, it has become one of the biggest ‘whistle-blowing’ agencies in modern history. In reality though, it is one of the biggest disinformation projects in modern history, and it may be the most dangerous because it is masquerading as an organization of truth. The information released by Wikileaks isn’t new; it isn’t groundbreaking; it doesn’t hurt the US as much as people think, it’s fractional really; and it is overloaded with as much as propaganda as the day-to-day Zionist media is. This propaganda is benefitting someone. And that someone is the illegal usurping entity of Israel. Even the Israeli government itself thinks so (1). 

Afghanistan Drivel

The first major ‘leak’ released earlier this year by Assange was about occupied Afghanistan in the form of more than 92,000 documents. These docs included ‘secret files’ about civilian killings by the US and NATO along with boogeyman stories about the long-dead Osama Bin Laden, garbage regarding the Taliban acquiring ground-to-air missiles, and plenty of lies about Pakistan’s intelligence agency, the ISI (2). There wasn’t a single document about the Israeli training of the Taliban (3), the massive drug profiteering by the Mossad (4), the CIA (5) and the US-puppet Hamid Karzai and his brother (6), Karzai’s connections to Unocal and Zionist war criminal Henry Kissinger (7), the clandestine Israeli business operations set up to take control of the oil fields in neighboring Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan (8), or the Russian-Jewish mafia, fully protected by the Zionist entity, selling guns to US-backed Afghan warlords (9). Why weren’t any of these massively important, critically damning events and operations mentioned? Because by doing so, it would incriminate the already internationally condemned Zionist regime. Journalists, bloggers and activists, from occupied Afghanistan and abroad, have been reporting on the vast civilian casualties in Afghanistan since US intervention began more than 30 years ago. Wikileaks revealed nothing that wasn’t already known; however, it did reinforce Zionist propaganda regarding the illegal ‘war on terror.’

Iraq Malarkey

The next major ‘leak’ by Assange’s organization, which has gained more notoriety than the previous ‘leak,’ was about occupied Iraq in the form of nearly 400,000 documents. Like the occupied Afghanistan disinformation, it included ‘secret files’ about mass civilian killings by US forces, torture by war criminal Nouri al-Maliki and his forces (which according to Wikileaks, US military officials attempted to halt) (10), US government failings in reprimanding Blackwater (XE) for committing murder (11), and brutal executions by the American and British occupiers mixed with more tripe about fictitious Al-Qaeda, nonsense about Iran training militant Iraqi militias and Iranian drones flying over Iraq (12), Iran smuggling guns, munitions, and explosives into Iraq (13), ridiculous accusations of the Lebanese Resistance movement Hezbollah training Iraqis in the art of kidnaping (14), slanderous attacks on Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, and other absurd assertions about the Islamic Republic involved in the murder of innocent Iraqis. The Wikileaks Iraq war logs also ‘reveal’ civilian casualties numbered at 66,081 (15). The logs also ‘reveal’ that Iraqi WMDs actually did exist, as US soldiers found chemical weapons labs, terrorist toxin specialists, and chemical weapons caches (16). 

There was nothing ‘secret’ about American and British forces murdering, torturing and raping innocents in occupied Iraq. Like Afghanistan, Iraqi and international journalists, bloggers, and activists have been reporting the murder of civilians in Iraq since the beginning of the illegal occupation, with much more effectiveness than Wikileaks. The US military didn’t attempt to halt the puppet al-Maliki’s torture of unlawfully imprisoned Iraqis, they partook in it. They led the way after they signed off on it. They were the primary perpetrators (17). Secret prisons are still operating at this very moment where US forces barbarously torture innocent Iraqis (18). The US hired Blackwater’s contractors to instill fear and execute terrorism against the people of Iraq, of course it didn’t reprimand them. Erik Prince’s private army of terror was only doing what it was told to by the US government.

The concept of Hezbollah training foreign militias to meddle in state affairs is absolute lunacy; Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah himself has stated on numerous occasions that if Hezbollah wanted to overthrow the Lebanese government, they would’ve done so already (19). Their objectives (as evidenced by their actions), are to protect the Lebanese people, provide them with security and uphold their dignity. Hezbollah hasn’t undermined its own government, it is asinine to think it would undermine the government of another nation. The propaganda targeting Iran is pathetic; there are enough guns in Iraq thanks to American support of Saddam Hussein to last lifetimes (20), there was no need for Iran to provide weapons to Iraqi militias through ‘smuggling.’ The only drones that were flying in Iraq’s skies belonged to the repulsive Zionist entity, not Iran (21). The other accusations sound like concoctions dug up from the dungeons of Zionist think tanks and lobby organizations salivating for the destruction of the Islamic Republic, not the work of whistle-blowers attempting to expose corruption and disseminate truth. These accusations further the Zionist case for striking Iran militarily. These accusations are promoting more war, not peace.

Wikileaks must not have gotten the memo about civilian casualties in occupied Iraq. They are nowhere near 66,081. They have eclipsed the 1.5 million mark. Anything less than this, especially a number as low as the one presented by Wikileaks, is classic misreporting aimed at protecting the United States government and its collaborators. That is an insult to the 5 million Iraqi orphans and the 5 million Iraqi refugees. It is a slap in the face to the dead Iraqis whose names will never be known because they were incinerated by US and Israeli weaponry. And the notion that US soldiers found WMDs in Iraq, after the ‘Iraq has WMDs’ myth has been debunked as Zionist-designed propaganda over and over again, is frankly, infuriating. The only WMDs that exist in Iraq are the mark-77, white phosphorus, and thousands of tons of depleted uranium used in Basra, Baghdad, and Fallujah by the terrorist army of the US and strategically placed Mossad agents of Israel (22).

Targeted On Behalf Of Israel

Where are the leaks on the 55 Zionist companies profiting from Iraqi blood being spilled (23)? Where are the leaks on Iraq’s artifacts being stolen by Zionist agents (24)? Where are the leaks on hundreds of Mossad agents operating in Mosul (25)? Where are the leaks on the Mossad bomb-making facility in Kirkuk (26)? Where are the leaks on the Mossad murderers stationed in several villages around the devastated area of Fallujah (27)? Where are the leaks on the depleted-uranium-tipped IEDs of Zionist-owned Zapata Engineering that have massacred thousands in Najaf, Karbala and Tal Afar, just to name a few (28)? Where are the leaks on the Israeli arms dealers supplying weapons to CIA-trained death squads (29)? Where are the leaks on Zionist war criminal Paul Wolfowitz importing Shin Bet torture experts to train the US military (30)? Where are the leaks on Mossad conducting interrogations and torture in Iraq jails, including Abu Ghraib (31)? Where are the leaks that will actually tie the illegal war, which was exclusively designed by Zionists, to Israel? They don’t exist because Wikileaks isn’t concerned with uncovering the truth regarding the real criminals; they’re concerned with leading the public away from the truth to keep them under control. It’s COINTELPRO all over again.

The target of Wikileaks’ first release was the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The objectives of the operation were to give credibility to war criminal Obama’s illegal drone strikes that have murdered over 1,000 civilians (32), raise the possibility of a future overt occupation, and cover up the meddling of Israel in occupied Afghanistan. It is vital to note that the de-stablization of Pakistan has been a Zionist objective since the declaration of al-Nakbah architect, David Ben-Gurion (33). The target of Wikileaks’ second release was the Islamic Republic of Iran. The objective of this operation was to slander two of the very few entities on earth resisting Israel, Hezbollah and Iran; as well as cover up the Zionist fingerprints all over the mutilation of Iraq. The IAEA has already inadvertently foiled the Zionist plan to attack Iran based on the nuclear premise, confirming that the Iranian nuclear program is peaceful in nature and has nothing to do with weaponization (34). The Zionist hasbara experts needed to try something new; through Wikileaks, the accusations of the Zionist Bush administration against Iran have resurfaced under the guise of ‘whistle-blowing.’ What a sham.

Conclusion

A final note needs to be made about Julian Assange, the man who has been praised as a freedom fighter, a revolutionary and a friend of the oppressed people. In a recent interview, he stated, “I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud (35).” It’s shameful that Assange is annoyed by those seeking truth regarding the reason 1.5 million innocents are dead in occupied Iraq, 1.2 million innocents are dead in occupied Afghanistan, and thousands of more innocent men, women and children are dead in occupied Palestine, Lebanon, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia. 9/11 is anything but a false conspiracy; there is overwhelming evidence that American and Israeli officials didn’t just have foreknowledge of the event, but planned the attack and carried it out. It was a Mossad-CIA false flag used to protect the Zionist entity from any future military threat and expand the parasitic hegemony of the US and the illegitimate Tel Aviv regime throughout the world via the Zionist-inspired ‘war on terror (36).’ Someone insulting the seekers of 9/11 truth, slandering the righteous movement of Hezbollah, spreading propaganda about Iran which adds to the demonization campaign levied against the Islamic Republic by the Zionist lobby and the Zionist media, and deliberately leaving out Israeli crimes in occupied Afghanistan and Iraq is no freedom fighter; such a person is a liar and a propagandist.

Wikileaks’ most recent ‘leak’ about occupied Iraq was delivered to several mainstream news outlets including Al-Jazeerah, the Zionist New York Times, Der Spiegel of Germany, which has smeared Hezbollah in the past by despicably accusing the Resistance of selling narcotics (37), Zionist-controlled Le Monde of France which has also smeared Hezbollah recently (38) and The Guardian of the UK, in packages, as if it was some sort of gift for a holiday. This isn’t a leak. This isn’t an expose. This is a press release. This is a media spectacle. This is a circus to cover up real crimes. Those interested in seeing a real leak, in addition to real courage, should read the story of Mordechai Vanunu, who blew the whistle on Israel’s nuclear program and has spent the last 26 years in and out of Israel’s inhumane prisons, including 18 years consecutively with 11 of those years in solitary confinement (39). 

Iraq was annihilated for the Zionist regime, as was Afghanistan. When discussing the destruction of these nations, and the murder of millions of their people, it is integral to the understanding of the crimes committed to discuss the Israeli role in these crimes. Any person or institution failing to do so is ignorant, a coward or a collaborationist. None of these persons have any place in the movement to restore the occupied lands to the indigenous people and bring their tormentors to justice. By supporting Wikileaks, you are not fighting the occupier. You are not honoring the martyrs. You are not combating imperialism. And you are not striking back at the oppressor. You are supporting Israel and the cover-up of the activities of its criminal network. Wikileaks is Zionist poison. Wake up.

~ The End ~

Sources:

(1) Wikileaks Reports Could Halt Iran’s Nuclear Drive by Yaakov Katz, Jerusalem Post

(2) Wikileaks, Afghanistan and Pakistan by Muhammad Abdullah Gul

(3) Framing Pakistan: How The Pro-Israel Media Enables India’s Surrogate Warfare by Maidhc O Cathhail

(4) Intel Expert Says 9/11 Looks Like A Hollywood Show by Christopher Bollyn

(5) The Spoils Of War: Afghanistan’s Multibillion Dollar Heroin Trade by Michel Chossudovsky

(6) Wikileaks Is Israel, Like We All Didn’t Know by Gordon Duff, Veterans Today 

(7) Profile: Unocal by History Commons

(8) The Great Game: The War For Caspian Oil And Gas by Christopher Bollyn

(9) Drugs For Guns: How The Afghan Heroin Trade Is Fueling The Taliban Insurgency by Jerome Starkey, The Independent; Red Mafiya: How The Russian Mob Has Invaded America by Robert Friedman (rip)

(10) Iraq War Documents Shed Light On Civilian Deaths, Prisoner Abuse by David Wood

(11) Iraq War Logs: Private Militarization Run Amok by Pratap Chatterjee, The Guardian

(12) US Shot Down Iranian Drone In Iraq, Wikileaks Confirms by Adam Weinstein

(13) Iraq War Logs Detail Iran’s Aid For Militias by Michael R. Gordon and Andrew W. Lehren, The New York Times

(14) Wikileaks Tip Iran’s Hand In Iraq by Samuel Segev, Winnipeg Free Press

(15) Iraq War Leaks: No US Investigation Of Many Abuses by Al-Masry Al-Youm

(16) Wikileaks Show WMD Hunt Continued In Iraq – With Surprising Results by Noah Shachtman

(17) Iraq Today: Afflicted By Violence, Devastation, Corruption And Desperation by Stephen Lendman

(18) Lawless Arrests, Detentions And Torture In Iraq by Stephen Lendman

(19) Sayyed Nasrallah: Bellemare, UN Protecting False Witnesses by Al-Manar 

(20) Ho Hum, More Wikileaks Chickenfeed by Gordon Duff, Veterans Today

(21) Israeli Drones Said Operating Over Iraq And Afghanistan by Yossi Melman, Haaretz

(22) The Zionist Murderers Of Iraq by Jonathan Azaziah

(23) 55 Zionist Companies Working In Iraq Under Assumed Names by Yaqen News Agency, translated by Muhammad Abu Nasr

(24) Israel Hopes To Colonize Parts of Iraq as ‘Greater Israel’ by Wayne Madsen

(25) Facts Vs. Beliefs –Today’s Ancient Warfare by Jeff Gates

(26) Resistance Kills Mossad Agents In Iraq by The Egyptian Gazette 

(27) Israel’s Battle In Fallujah by Rashid Khashana, Al-Hayat

(28) Iraq IEDs: Mossad/Zapata Engineering Conspiracy? by Cloak and Dagger; Israeli Made IEDs and US Zapata Engineering made IED Triggers Are Killing US, Canadian And NATO Soldiers by NB Gazette

(29) Israeli Officer Sells Weapons To Terrorists In Iraq by Press TV; CIA Death Squads Operating In Iraq by Henry Michaels

(30) Seymour Hersh And The Missing Zionist-Israeli Connection by James Petras

(31) Mossad Does Interrogations in Iraqi Jails: Human Rights Group by China Radio International English; What Were Mossad Agents With Fraudulent New Zealand Passports Doing In Iraq? by Jerry Mazza

(32) US Drone Strikes Kill 18 In Pakistan by Press TV

(33) Mossad And India Spy Agency Team Up, Target Pakistan by Tariq Saeedi

(34) IAEA Report: Zero Evidence Of Iran Nukes. US Orwellian Corporate Media: Iran Building Nukes? by Carl Herman, The Los Angeles Examiner

(35) Wanted By The CIA: The Man Who Keeps No Secrets by Matthew Bell, The Independent

(36) 9/11: Israel’s Grand Deception by Jonathan Azaziah

(37) Hezbollah Denies Der Spiegel’s ‘Cheap Fabrications’ by Al-Manar

(38) Le Monde: A Group Affiliated With Hezbollah Takes Photos Of The Hague by NOW Lebanon

(39) The Woman From Mossad: The Story Of Mordechai Vanunu And The Israeli Nuclear Program by Peter Hounam

Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison II: Deconstruction Of The Myth

45 comments:

  1. Wikileaks was a fraud the minute they discredited 9/11 truth. 9/11 and Israel, here:
    http://www.iuniverse.com/Bookstore/BookDetail.aspx?BookId=SKU-000190526

  2. great and well written. Kudos, keep up the good work.

  3. Anonymous
  4. Awesome, couldn’t have said it better myself !

  5. Spot on. Assange is an indicator of just how desperate the 9/11 psychos are getting.

  6. Anonymous
  7. its true, Assange is a shill. fails 911 test big time. its obvious with your eyes open once you’re on the lookout for disinfo. thanks for this article, well said.

  8. Thank you everyone for reading; all of your comments are sincerely appreciated.

  9. To Peter Wakefield Sault, Assange and his organization are anything but spot on. As discussed in the article, they are liars and propagandists, and as I will discuss in the follow-up to this piece, plants for the CIA and Mossad.

  10. Jonathan, came across your site via Northerntruthseeker. Just read this piece and it’s the best article I’ve read in a while. Thanks for the work you’re doing. Keep it up.

  11. What you are spreading here are very unsubstantiated allegations. See:

  12. 1. You claim, Julian Assange is a Zionist agent, because Zionist mouthpiece Jpost says he helped Israel. Funny. I wouldn’t believe Jpost a word. It’s just hasbara, like usual. The opposite is true. The War Logs make it harder for Israel to trick the US public into a new war for Israel, because fewer people in the US will buy the stories of clean.

  13. 2. Neither the Afghan War Logs blame PAK for much nor do the Iraq War Logs blame Iran. The opposite is true. These files add proof to allegations of gross US war crimes on a massive scale. They might even be used as evidence to prosecute high-ranking US officials, most of them very friendly with Israel. It will disturb Zionist plans, when those people get prosecuted. To cover up the facts, some Zionist influenced media outlets tried stiockpicking docs from the logs and spin a stories against PAK and Iran from it.

  14. 3. Julian Assange said he doesn’t believe in 9/11 conspiracy. About half the world does neither. That is no proof that they are all Zionist agents. And in the end, the official story, that the Bushists didn’t do anything to prevent 9/11, because they were just too busy with planning a war of aggression against Iraq on Israels behalf, isn’t so much different from the allegation, that they were actively involved in helping Mossad to carry out the 9/11-attacks. Both, the official story and the conspiracy allegation are a cry for a tough new investigation and serious prosecution.

  15. To Bandolero, there is nothing unsubstantiated about what was revealed in this article as there is a list of sources following the conclusion of the piece. All of the information is there for anyone to see.

  16. Nowhere was it written that I believed Assange was a Zionist agent due to the musings of Jpost; It was written that Assange fits the profile of a Zionist agent due to his organization saying absolutely nothing about the Zionist destruction of Iraq and the Zionist crimes committed in Afghanistan, some of which were mentioned in the article. A whole book could be written on the Zionist desecration of these nations.

Hi, I think you got ‘the wrong end of the stick’ with a comment up there, 

Peter Wakefield Sault said…

Spot on. Assange is an indicator of just how desperate the 9/11 psychos are getting

He is saying that YOU were spot on, that Assange is a sign that they are getting desperate, the 911 psychos being the zionist regime. 

I had to re read Peter’s comment a few times and i see nothing but praise and agreement from him, try reading it again yourself, I think an apology to Peter is in order !

Reply

  • Amazing critique, beautifully expressed. Thank You.

  • After reading Mr. Wakefield Sault’s comment again numerous times myself, I’ve arrived at the same conclusion as you; his ‘9/11 psychos’ comment was directed at the psychotic Zionist criminal network attempting to cover up its murderous misbehavior. You are right, an apology is in order.

  • I do apologize Peter for misinterpreting your comment; my initial response was totally unwarranted.

  • Reply
  • Julian Assange, man of mystery, sex outlaw, stratospheric genius, hacker extraordinaire and globe trotting Pimpernel…. Returns to the The Larry King Show tonight to answer some hard ball questions about his hair.

  • Reply
  • Anonymous
  • Great critique–the best I’ve read on the subject. Those were some of the same twists of the truth that set my “deceptacon” alarms to buzzing. Under reporting of the deaths-66,000 instead of the more than 1.5 million as discovered in research so respected that it made publication in the Lancet a few years ago. And statements made by Assange himself, “911 truthers annoy me” and the new war docs reveal that “the war is mitigated by Pakistan and possibly by Iran.” ??? That’s a load of crap and an obvious scripted comment.

  • Reply
  • I think WikiLeaks seeks the truth in theory .. in practice it can only “leak” what is given to it .. so the masters of disinformation such as Mossad, CIA etc can swamp it with 1000s of “leaked” documents the same way corporate lawyers swamp defendants with masses of documents knowing they haven’t got the man-power.

  • I’m holding judgement on WikiLeaks and Assange. When someone goes public saying they had anti-Zionist leaks against Israel and WikiLeaks didn’t help them then we’ll know for (nearly) sure.

  • Reply
  • Just to clarify my previous post, I think WikiLeaks is now being used by Zionists, CIA etc. as a tool to aid their disinformation tactics, but I don’t think WikiLeaks itself is Zionist (yet).

  • Reply
  • Anonymous
  • garbage

  • Reply
  • Anonymous
  • Thanks a lot!! Keep up the good work buddy.

  • Reply
  • Anonymous
  • The Israeli propaganda front Wikipedia (founders Jimmy Wales, Larry Sanger and senior editor David Miller, etc.) – had a preview of the new Wikileaks files on the US-Turkish relations before they were made public on Sunday.

  • Reply
  • AnonymousNovember 29, 2010 at 10:14 PM

    higher end officials operate under the belief/construct of al qaeda and imminent danger so of course the documents must reflect those myths to prevent deterioration from the top down. If the intent of the article is to suggest that Assange some how censored or contrieved the information as a zionist conspirator, well i dont believe thats substantiated. If youre trying to suggest that he didnt uncover the right documents, assuming they were available and or existed… well that still isnt his fault.

    Reply

  • well written, and please try to mention India in a better light. Most Indians are not even aware that israel and the jew-hijacked-US-Government is bad for the world. I am sure wikileaks is israeli misinformation. Can someone please enlighten me as to how the israeli zionists are usurping India’s good name? Apart from their claim over Kashmir i don’t think i have anything against Pakistan. In fact they are more like us than any other country, hell they were India till 1949. Plus i also am sure that the 26/11 attack on a 5-star hotel was carried out my Mossad and not Islamic terrorists.

  • I completely and totally agree; Wikileaks is Zionist garbage.

  • Reply
  • Anonymous
  • good post, I also sent a Rabbi Weiss video to red ice creations (another “underground” truth website) The video denounced Zionism as part of the Jewish faith, they initially posted it up, then removed it promptly. Red ice creations, shill site.

  • Reply
  • Anonymous
  • This article is what the free Internet is all about.

  • Reply
  • To Rehmat:

  • Peace and blessings brother,

  • Thank you for the information; I visit your blog often, and it’s one of the best on the web.

  • Reply
  • To scrxbandit:

  • The purpose of the article was to expose Wikileaks as the Zionist propaganda front that it is. Wikileaks hasn’t done anything but cover up the crimes of Zion in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, as well as slander the Lebanese Resistance and reinforce Zionist propaganda against Iran.

  • The idea that the info in the documents that were leaked ‘aren’t Assange’s fault’ is beyond pathetic, and exceedingly ridiculous. Assange’s organization released the documents to the Zionist media, of course it is his fault, of course he’s responsible for it.

  • And it doesn’t matter whether the documents were obtained from US officials or officials from Jupiter; if all of the info benefits the Zionist entity, how can anyone support it?

  • Reply
  • To KBX:

  • Reply
  • Peace and blessings to everyone.

  • I am currently gathering information for Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison II; it will deal with the current propaganda in the ‘cablegate’ leaks and some shocking revelations about Assange and his team. It should be ready by the end of next week God willing.

  • Thank you all again so much for your time, your input, your comments and your support.

  • Reply
  • Anonymous
  • Azaziah thanks again for another good article.

  • I want to notice the next point, maybe you could figure it out:
    Could wikileaks not be a virus source?
    In the summer (I believe end of July) the first time Wikileaks started publish documents about Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.
    In September the Iranian nuclear installation had been infected so the Iranians could not start their work.

  • Now Wikileaks writes about an insurance file (to prevent arresting Assange and demolish its organization, they say). That insurance file could be a bait for the targeted ones (Iran especially). Wikileaks says it contains more secret information than before, the targeted ones will surely download it in order to get the information inside.

  • I hope you can check this out.

  • Reply
  • That is very interesting indeed. I will definitely look into it. It seems like it could be connected to the recent Stuxnet virus that Israel implanted in Iran’s security apparatuses to tamper with the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program. If it warrants a mention, I’ll definitely include it in the second Wikileaks installment. Peace.

  • Reply
  • Anonymous
  • This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

  • Reply
  • RafaelDecember 8, 2010 at 7:47 PM
    Hey Jonathan,

    If I translate your excelent article into Spanish will you post it here?
    Reply


    Jonathan AzaziahDecember 10, 2010 at 12:32 AM
    Peace and blessings Rafael,

    It would be an honor if you translated my article, but I will not include the full text here, as this is an English blog. What I will do however, is include the link to Spanish on the article, right after the phrase, ‘The End.’ Thank you so very much for the gesture brother and let me know when the translation is complete.
    Reply


    ChicagosMonsterDecember 10, 2010 at 12:29 PM
    I am still finding this difficult to process and swallow – I definitely think Julian Assange consulted and “edited” the leaks for Israel (when he met with the “leadership” of that “country”) but that doesn’t necessarily discredit ALL of it. I think there may be valuable information in at least some of these documents, whether controlled opposition or not.

    All I’m saying is, let’s not burn bridges before they’re even used. Only 0.5% of the cables have been released, 99.5% to go. Let’s see what they’ve got in store before we relegate this to the realms of hasbara.
    Reply


    ByrdDecember 10, 2010 at 12:51 PM
    Ill tell ya.. reading your retorts to those few comments were just as enjoyable as reading the article itself. Youre an awesome writer. Even better rapper 😉

    Keep it up!
    Reply


    AnonymousDecember 14, 2010 at 10:37 PM
    From France, thank you very much for this great job !! In our country we must face to a very powerfull sionist propaganda and this is very helpfull for us to escape the mind control 😉

    Somebody translate your text here in french http://nemesisnom.fr/conspirations/wikileaks-une-intox-sioniste/

    so we are posting it anywhere the sionists try to influence the french people! Thank you again ! And sorry for my english…
    Reply


    Jonathan AzaziahDecember 15, 2010 at 10:45 AM
    To Bardamu:

    You don’t have to apologize at all brother, your English is good =)

    Thank you so much for the translation, and please keep fighting against the Zionist Power Configuration in France. Truth and dignity are our weapons, and we will prevail God willing.

    Peace and blessings.
    Reply


    AnonymousDecember 22, 2010 at 7:59 AM
    I am confused. Bradley Manning is the one who leaked the 250,000 diplomatic cables to Wikileaks, is he not? So how is Mossad involved in this? I know Israel paid Assange to keep information about Israel out so I am not talking about that. Could it be that the information leaked is just of mediocre value? I am talking about the diplomatic cables particularly. And that they seem to support the campaign to invade Iran because many of the reports we see in the media have been handpicked by the media which has an anti-Iran bias? Once again I am referring to the diplomatic cables.

    Has it been confirmed that Manning is the source of the diplomatic cables? If he was, how did he gain access to them from Afghanistan and Iraq? Wouldn’t he have had to have been in Washington DC to get access to them?

    My theory was that Mossad leaked the diplomatic cables to Assange but I have read in Wikipedia and other places that Manning confessed to the authorities that he leaked the diplomatic cables.

    I think this is crucial to determining the authenticity of the cables. If it was Manning who leaked them, I don’t see how the Zionists can be involved. I doubt there was an agent who led him to do this. Also, the videos are very damaging. If it wasn’t Manning who leaked the diplomatic cables, then that changes everything.

    BTW, I believe the Zionists did the 9/11 attacks.
    Reply


    Jonathan AzaziahDecember 26, 2010 at 12:35 AM
    Peace and blessings.

    Thank you for your comment and your insight brother.

    In reference to the diplomatic cables, it is important to note that the documents are digital, and therefore, they are impossible to verify. http://bit.ly/e7ewAf

    The Zionist media has widely reported that Manning is the source, but in reality, these entities do not know. Even Julian Assange himself has admitted that he doesn’t know who his sources are, or where the documents originated, and he further stated that he never heard Manning’s name until Zionism’s media machine began speaking about him. http://bit.ly/fYFSBD This is obviously to cover up who is really behind his organization.

    While Wikileaks’ official Twitter page displays an avatar that states ‘Free Bradley,’ Assange’s organization is doing nothing to provide for his legal defense, going back on a previous promise. http://bit.ly/fL9C4e

    ‘Alternative’ media is now reporting that Bradley Manning is being tortured, but would someone being maliciously tortured by the US military ask his ‘supporters’ to remember the military who are separated from their loved ones due to deployment? I.e. committing murderous war crimes in occupied Iraq and occupied Afghanistan. http://bit.ly/hqKodT

    Manning is a distraction to detract from where the leaks are really coming from: Mossad and the CIA, as you asserted, and as I laid out here in my sequel to this article. http://www.maskofzion.com/2010/12/wikileaks-is-zionist-poison-ii.html

    The rule of thumb is brother, if the Zionist media is telling you to believe something, do yourself a favor and do the exact opposite.

    Happy holidays to you.
    Reply


    AnonymousDecember 28, 2010 at 6:33 AM
    This is a perfect example of good logic based on some shaky assumptions, producing shaky conclusions.

    Just because the leaks were mostly self serving, does not necessarily imply that they were fabricated. It is possible that the diplomats and U.S. people who created the secret memos/files themselves were biased, misinformed, or simply were offering an opinion based on their own version of the truth.

    Also, it would be rather shocking if the leaks were negative towards Israel. Just as in public, privately American diplomats do not criticize Israel for known reasons.

    The leaked documents should be taken for what they are: secret memos, and internal diplomatic communication that contain some facts when they pertain to meetings or events, AND secret opinions when they pertain to viewpoints on certain political figures or political groups.
    Reply


    Jonathan AzaziahDecember 30, 2010 at 7:25 PM
    By admitting that the leaks were ‘mostly self serving,’ you have disqualified the remainder of your argument brother. Anything that serves the Zionist agenda cannot be trusted, period. In addition, your argument, which doesn’t have a firm foundation at all, has been demolished, demolished again and re-demolished for good measure here:

    http://www.maskofzion.com/2010/12/wikileaks-is-zionist-poison-ii.html

    Besides brother, ‘Wikileaks Is Zionist Posion’ is about the ridiculous Afghan and Iraq war logs, which made absolutely no mention of Zionist crimes against humanity in either occupied nation. Next time, you should read the article carefully before replying with irrelevance.

    The link that I posted is the sequel; it represents the deconstruction of Cablegate and it proves that the cables are in fact fabricated.

    Peace and blessings.
    Reply


    AnonymousApril 22, 2011 at 2:41 AM
    Thank you for this article. Keep up the good work and writing.
    Reply


    abu dhabi desert safariJuly 29, 2011 at 4:16 AM
    good article ,Thanks for sharing
    Reply


    AnonymousSeptember 11, 2011 at 9:43 PM
    Bravo!! Everything I’ve been thinking about him since he blew up. Now mind you I can collaborate further by saying he is a disinformation agent sent to lure in the disillusioned poor Americans I.e. Specifically the non-participatory youth who donot see a point in supporting one alitist agenda over another… And those are our options. I believe it was a project to see if they could motivate, or light fire under lazy American asses that no one wants to drag along through society, to put it bluntly and uncandid. And it worked. So once again I see this tactic utilized by the Republican campaign, one year after this article was written, and another article of similar nature states that part of the agenda is to create a campaign against Obama. Almost one year later, Ron Paul is capturing the hearts of “truthists” and sad, retired Obama supporters in this country. Let it be on record, I am suspect of that man…
    Reply

    Like this:

    A blueprint for Tyranny – Report from Iron Mountain


    © see below (fair use)

    Report report_from_iron_mountain.pdf

    Report from Iron Mountain; Using fear to make people subservient to government.

    ***************

    © 2002 by G. Edward Griffin

    Freedom Force International

    This is taken from Chapter 24 of The Creature from Jekyll Island

    (When added to The Freedom Manifesto, this material should be expanded to include the concept of deliberate waste. With that included, it will make an excellent chapter.)

    The substance of these stratagems [for the weakening of the United States so it can be more easily merged into a global government based on the model of collectivism] can be traced to a think-tank study released in 1966 called the Report from Iron Mountain. Although the origin of the report is highly debated, the document itself hints that it was commissioned by the Department of Defense under Defense Secretary, Robert McNamara and was produced by the Hudson Institute located at the base of Iron Mountain in Croton-on-Hudson, New York. The Hudson Institute was founded and directed by Herman Kahn, formerly of the Rand Corporation. Both McNamara and Kahn were members of the CFR.

    The self-proclaimed purpose of the study was to explore various ways to “stabilize society.” Praiseworthy as that may sound, a reading of the Report soon reveals that the word society is used synonymously with the word government. Furthermore, the word stabilize is used as meaning to preserve and to perpetuate. It is clear from the start that the nature of the study was to analyze the different ways a government can perpetuate itself in power, ways to control its citizens and prevent them from rebelling. It was stated at the beginning of the Report that morality was not an issue. The study did not address questions of right or wrong; nor did it deal with such concepts as freedom or human rights. Ideology was not an issue, nor patriotism, nor religious precepts. Its sole concern was how to perpetuate the existing government. The Report said: 

    Previous studies have taken the desirability of peace, the importance of human life, the superiority of democratic institutions, the greatest “good” for the greatest number, the “dignity” of the individual, the desirability of maximum health and longevity, and other such wishful premises as axiomatic values necessary for the justification of a study of peace issues. We have not found them so. We have attempted to apply the standards of physical science to our thinking, the principal characteristic of which is not quantification, as is popularly believed, but that, in Whitehead’s words, “…it ignores all judgments of value; for instance, all esthetic and moral judgments.” (1)

    The major conclusion of the report was that, in the past, war has been the only reliable means to achieve that goal. It contends that only during times of war or the threat of war are the masses compliant enough to carry the yoke of government without complaint. Fear of conquest and pillage by an enemy can make almost any burden seem acceptable by comparison. War can be used to arouse human passion and patriotic feelings of loyalty to the nation’s leaders. No amount of sacrifice in the name of victory will be rejected. Resistance is viewed as treason. But, in times of peace, people become resentful of high taxes, shortages, and bureaucratic intervention. When they become disrespectful of their leaders, they become dangerous. No government has long survived without enemies and armed conflict. War, therefore, has been an indispensable condition for “stabilizing society.” These are the report’s exact words:

    The war system not only has been essential to the existence of nations as independent political entities, but has been equally indispensable to their stable political structure. Without it, no government has ever been able to obtain acquiescence in its “legitimacy,” or right to rule its society. The possibility of war provides the sense of external necessity without which no government can long remain in power. The historical record reveals one instance after another where the failure of a regime to maintain the credibility of a war threat led to its dissolution, by the forces of private interest, of reactions to social injustice, or of other disintegrative elements. The organization of society for the possibility of war is its principal political stabilizer…. It has enabled societies to maintain necessary class distinctions, and it has insured the subordination of the citizens to the state by virtue of the residual war powers inherent in the concept of nationhood. (2)

    A NEW DEFINITION OF PEACE

    The report then explains that we are approaching a point in history where the old formulas may no longer work. Why? Because it may now be possible to create a world government in which all nations will be disarmed and disciplined by a world army, a condition which will be called peace. The report says: “The word peace, as we have used it in the following pages, … implies total and general disarmament.” (3)

    Under that scenario, independent nations will no longer exist and governments will not have the capability to wage war. There could be military action by the world army against renegade political subdivisions, but these would be called peace-keeping operations, and soldiers would be called peace keepers. No matter how much property is destroyed or how much blood is spilled, the bullets will be “peaceful” bullets and the bombs – even atomic bombs, if necessary – will be “peaceful” bombs.

    The report then raises the question of whether there can ever be a suitable substitute for war. What else could the regional governments use – and what could the world government itself use – to legitimize and perpetuate itself? To provide an answer to that question was the stated purpose of the study.

    The Report from Iron Mountain concludes that there can be no substitute for war unless it possesses three properties. It must (1) be economically wasteful, (2) represent a credible threat of great magnitude, and (3) provide a logical excuse for compulsory service to the government.

    A SOPHISTICATED FORM OF SLAVERY

    On the subject of compulsory service, the Report explains that one of the advantages of standing armies is that they provide a place for the government to put antisocial and dissident elements of society. In the absence of war, these forced-labor battalions would be told they are fighting poverty or cleaning up the planet or bolstering the economy or serving the common good in some other fashion. Every teenager would be required to serve – especially during those years in which young people are most rebellious against authority. Older people, too, would be drafted as a means of working off tax payments and fines. Dissidents would face heavy fines for “hate crimes” and politically incorrect attitudes so, eventually, they would all be in the forced-labor battalions. The Report says:

    We will examine … the time-honored use of military institutions to provide anti-social elements with an acceptable role in the social structure. … The current euphemistic clichés – “juvenile delinquency” and “alienation” – have had their counterparts in every age. In earlier days these conditions were dealt with directly by the military without the complications of due process, usually through press gangs or outright enslavement. …

    Most proposals that address themselves, explicitly or otherwise, to the postwar problem of controlling the socially alienated turn to some variant of the Peace Corps or the so-called Job Corps for a solution. The socially disaffected, the economically unprepared, the psychologically uncomfortable, the hard-core “delinquents,” the incorrigible “subversives,” and the rest of the unemployable are seen as somehow transformed by the disciplines of a service modeled on military precedent into more or less dedicated social service workers. …

    Another possible surrogate for the control of potential enemies of society is the reintroduction, in some form consistent with modern technology and political processes, of slavery. … It is entirely possible that the development of a sophisticated form of slavery may be an absolute prerequisite for socialcontrol in a world at peace. As a practical matter, conversion of the code of military discipline to a euphemized form of enslavement would entail surprisingly little revision; the logical first step would be the adoption of some form of “universal” military service. (4)

    BLOOD GAMES

    The Report considered ways in which the public could be preoccupied with non-important activities so that it would not have time to participate in political debate or resistance. Recreation, trivial game shows, pornography, and situation comedies could play an important role, but blood games were considered to be the most promising of all the options. Blood games are competitive events between individuals or teams that are sufficiently violent in nature to enable the spectators to vicariously work off their frustrations. As a minimum, these events must evoke a passionate team loyalty on the part of the fans and must include the expectation of pain and injury on the part of the players. Even better for their purpose is the spilling of blood and the possibility of death. The common man has a morbid fascination for violence and blood. Crowds gather to chant “Jump! Jump!” at the suicidal figure on a hotel roof. Cars slow to a near stop on the highway to gawk at broken bodies next to a collision.

    A schoolyard fight instantly draws a circle of spectators. Boxing matches and football games and hockey games and automobile races are telecast daily, attracting millions of cheering fans who give rapt attention to each moment of danger, each angry blow to the face, each broken bone, each knockout, each carrying away of the unconscious or possibly dying contestant. In this fashion, their anger at “society” is defused and focused, instead, on the opposing team. The emperors of Rome devised the Circuses and gladiator contests and public executions by wild beasts for precisely that purpose.

    Before jumping to the conclusion that such concepts are absurd in modern times, recall that during the 1985 European soccer championship in Belgium, the spectators became so emotionally involved in the contest that a bloody riot broke out in the bleachers leaving behind 38 dead and more that 400 injured. U.S. News & World Report gives this account:

    The root of the trouble: A tribal loyalty to home teams that surpasses an obsession and, say some experts, has become a substitute religion for many. The worst offenders include members of gangs such as Chelsea’s Anti-Personnel Firm, made up of ill-educated young males who find in soccer rivalry an escape from boredom.

    Still, the British do not have a patent on soccer violence. On May 26, eight people were killed and more than 50 injured in Mexico City,… a 1964 stadium riot in Lima, Peru, killed more than 300 – and a hotly disputed 1969 match between El Salvador and Honduras led to a week-long shooting war between the two countries, causing hundreds of casualties.

    The U.S. is criticized for the gridiron violence of its favorite sport, football, but outbursts in the bleachers are rare because loyalties are spread among many sports and national pride is not at stake. Said Thomas Tutko, professor of psychology at California’s San Jose State University: “In these other countries, it used to be their armies. Now it’s their competitive teams that stir passions.” (5)

    Having considered all the ramifications of blood games, The Report from Iron Mountain concluded that they were not an adequate substitute for war. It is true that violent sports are useful distracters and do, in fact, allow an outlet for boredom and fierce group loyalty, but their effect on the nation’s psyche could not match the intensity of war hysteria. Until a better alternative could be found, world government would have to be postponed so that nations could continue to wage war.

    FINDING A CREDIBLE GLOBAL THREAT

    In time of war, most citizens uncomplainingly accept their low quality of life and remain fiercely loyal to their leaders. If a suitable substitute for war is to be found, then it must also elicit that same reaction. Therefore, a new enemy must be found that threatens the entire world, and the prospects of being overcome by that enemy must be just as terrifying as war itself. The Report is emphatic on that point:

    Allegiance requires a cause; a cause requires an enemy. This much is obvious; the critical point is that the enemy that defines the cause must seem genuinely formidable. Roughly speaking, the presumed power of the “enemy” sufficient to warrant an individual sense of allegiance to a society must be proportionate to the size and complexity of the society. Today, of course, that power must be one of unprecedented magnitude and frightfulness. (6)

    The first consideration in finding a suitable threat to serve as a global enemy was that it did not have to be real. A real one would be better, of course, but an invented one would work just as well, provided the masses could be convinced it was real. The public will more readily believe some fictions than others. Credibility would be more important than truth.

    Poverty was examined as a potential global enemy but rejected as not fearful enough. Most of the world was already in poverty. Only those who had never experienced poverty would see it as a global threat. For the rest, it was simply a fact of everyday life.

    An invasion by aliens from outer space was given serious consideration. The report said that experiments along those lines already may have been tried. Public reaction, however, was not sufficiently predictable, because the threat was not “credible.” Here is what the report had to say:

    Credibility, in fact, lies at the heart of the problem of developing a political substitute for war. This is where the space-race proposals, in many ways so well suited as economic substitutes for war, fall short. The most ambitious and unrealistic space project cannot of itself generate a believable external menace. It has been hotly argued that such a menace would offer the “last best hope of peace,” etc., by uniting mankind against the danger of destruction by “creatures” from other planets or from outer space. Experiments have been proposed to test the credibility of an out-of-our-world invasion threat; it is possible that a few of the more difficult-to-explain “flying saucer” incidents of recent years were in fact early experiments of this kind. If so, they could hardly have been judged encouraging. (7)

    This report was released in 1966 when the idea of an alien presence seemed far fetched to the average person. In the ensuing years, however, that perception has changed. A growing segment of the population now believes that intelligent life forms may exist beyond our planet and could be monitoring our own civilization. Whether that belief is right or wrong is not the issue here. The point is that a dramatic encounter with aliens shown on network television – even if it were to be entirely fabricated by high-tech computer graphics or laser shows in the sky – could be used to stampede all nations into world government supposedly to defend the Earth from invasion. On the other hand, if the aliens were perceived to have peaceful intent, an alternative scenario would be to form world government to represent a unified human species speaking with a single voice in some kind of galactic federation. Either scenario would be far more credible today than in 1966.

    THE ENVIRONMENTAL-POLLUTION MODEL

    The final candidate for a useful global threat was pollution of the environment. This was viewed as the most likely to succeed because it could be related to observable conditions such as smog and water pollution– in other words, it would be based partly on fact and, therefore, be credible. Predictions could be made showing end-of-earth scenarios just as horrible as atomic warfare. Accuracy in these predictions would not be important. Their purpose would be to frighten, not to inform. It might even be necessary to deliberately poison the environment to make the predictions more convincing and to focus the public mind on fighting a new enemy, more fearful than any invader from another nation – or even from outer space. The masses would more willingly accept a falling standard of living, tax increases, and bureaucratic intervention in their lives as simply “the price we must pay to save Mother Earth.” A massive battle against death and destruction from global pollution possibly could replace war as justification for social control.

    Did The Report from Iron Mountain really say that? It certainly did – and much more. Here are just a few of the pertinent passages:

    When it comes to postulating a credible substitute for war … the “alternate enemy” must imply a more immediate, tangible, and directly felt threat of destruction. It must justify the need for taking and paying a “blood price” in wide areas of human concern. In this respect, the possible substitute enemies noted earlier would be insufficient. One exception might be the environmental-pollution model, if the danger to society it posed was genuinely imminent. The fictive models would have to carry the weight of extraordinary conviction, underscored with a not inconsiderable actual sacrifice of life. … It may be, for instance, that gross pollution of the environment can eventually replace the possibility of mass destruction by nuclear weapons as the principal apparent threat to the survival of the species. Poisoning of the air, and of the principal sources of food and water supply, is already well advanced, and at first glance would seem promising in this respect; it constitutes a threat that can be dealt with only through social organization and political power. …

    It is true that the rate of pollution could be increased selectively for this purpose. … But the pollution problem has been so widely publicized in recent years that it seems highly improbable that a program of deliberate environmental poisoning could be implemented in a politically acceptable manner.

    However unlikely some of the possible alternative enemies we have mentioned may seem, we must emphasize that one must be found of credible quality and magnitude, if a transition to peace is ever to come about without social disintegration. It is more probable, in our judgment, that such a threat will have to be invented. (8)

    AUTHENTICITY OF THE REPORT

    The Report from Iron Mountain states that it was produced by a Special Study Group of fifteen men whose identities were to remain secret and that it was not intended to be made public. One member of the group, however, felt the Report was too important to be kept under wraps. He was not in disagreement with its conclusions. He merely believed that more people should read it. He delivered his personal copy to Leonard Lewin, a well-known author and columnist who, in turn, negotiated its publication by Dial Press. It was then reprinted by Dell Publishing.

    This was during the Johnson Administration, and the President’s Special Assistant for National Security Affairs was CFR member Walt Rostow. Rostow was quick to announce that the report was a spurious work. Herman Kahn, CFR director of the Hudson Institute, said it was not authentic. The Washington Post – which was owned and run by CFR member Katharine Graham – called it “a delightful satire.” Time magazine, founded by CFR-member Henry Luce, said it was a skillful hoax.

    Then, on November 26, 1967, the Report was reviewed in the book section of the Washington Post by Herschel McLandress, which was the pen name for Harvard professor John Kenneth Galbraith. Galbraith, who also had been a member of the CFR, said that he knew firsthand of the Report’s authenticity because he had been invited to participate in it. Although he was unable to be part of the official group, he was consulted from time to time and had been asked to keep the project a secret. Furthermore, while he doubted the wisdom of letting the public know about the Report, he agreed totally with its conclusions. He wrote:

    As I would put my personal repute behind the authenticity of this document, so would I testify to the validity of its conclusions. My reservations relate only to the wisdom of releasing it to an obviously unconditioned public. (9)

    Six weeks later, in an Associated Press dispatch from London, Galbraith went even further and jokingly admitted that he was “a member of the conspiracy.”(10)

    That, however, did not settle the issue. The following day, Galbraith backed off. When asked about his “conspiracy” statement, he replied: “For the first time since Charles II The Times has been guilty of a misquotation. … Nothing shakes my conviction that it was written by either Dean Rusk or Mrs. Clare Booth Luce.” (11)

    The reporter who conducted the original interview was embarrassed by the allegation and did further research. Six days later, this is what he reported: Misquoting seems to be a hazard to which Professor Galbraith is prone. The latest edition of the Cambridge newspaper Varsity quotes the following (tape recorded) interchange:

    Interviewer: “Are you aware of the identity of the author of Report from Iron Mountain?”

    Galbraith: “I was in general a member of the conspiracy but I was not the author. I have always assumed that it was the man who wrote the foreword – Mr. Lewin.” (12)

    So, on at least three occasions, Galbraith publicly endorsed the authenticity of the Report but denied that he wrote it. Then who did? Was it Leonard Lewin, after all? In 1967 he said he did not. In 1972 he said that he did. Writing in The New York Times Book Review Lewin explained: “I wrote the ‘Report,” all of it. … What I intended was simply to pose the issues of war and peace in a provocative way.” (13)

    But wait! A few years before that, columnist William F. Buckley told the New York Times that he was the author. That statement was undoubtedly made tongue-in-cheek, but who and what are we to believe? Was it written by Herman Kahn, John Kenneth Galbraith, Dean Rusk, Clare Booth Luce, Leonard Lewin, or William F. Buckley?

    In the final analysis, it makes little difference. The important point is that The Report from Iron Mountain, whether written as a think-tank study or a political satire, explains the reality that surrounds us. Regardless of its origin, the concepts presented in it are now being implemented in almost every detail. All one has to do is hold the Report in one hand and the daily newspaper in the other to realize that every major trend in American life is conforming to the blueprint. So many things that otherwise are incomprehensible suddenly become clear: foreign aid, wasteful spending, the destruction of American industry, a job corps, gun control, a national police force, the apparent demise of Soviet power, a UN army, disarmament, a world bank, a world money, the surrender of national independence through treaties, and the ecology hysteria. The Report from Iron Mountain is an accurate summary of the plan that has already created our present. It is now shaping our future.

    ENVIRONMENTALISM A SUBSTITUTE FOR WAR

    It is beyond the scope of this study to prove that currently accepted predictions of environmental doom are based on exaggerated and fraudulent “scientific studies.” But such proof is easily found if one is willing to look at the raw data and the assumptions upon which the projections are based. More important, however, is the question of why end-of-world scenarios based on phony scientific studies – or no studies at all – are uncritically publicized by the CFR-controlled media; or why radical environmental groups advocating collectivist doctrine and anti-business programs are lavishly funded by CFR-dominated foundations, banks, and corporations, the very groups that would appear to have the most to lose. The Report from Iron Mountain answers those questions.

    As the Report pointed out, truth is not important in these matters. It’s what people can be made to believe that counts. “Credibility” is the key, not reality. There is just enough truth in the fact of environmental pollution to make predictions of planetary doom in the year two-thousand-something seem believable. All that is required is media cooperation and repetition. The plan has apparently worked. People of the industrialized nations have been subjected to a barrage of documentaries, dramas, feature films, ballads, poems, bumper stickers, posters, marches, speeches, seminars, conferences, and concerts. The result has been phenomenal. Politicians are now elected to office on platforms consisting of nothing more than an expressed concern for the environment and a promise to clamp down on those nasty industries. No one questions the damage done to the economy or the nation. It makes no difference when the very planet on which we live is sick and dying. Not one in a thousand will question that underlying premise. How could it be false? Look at all the movie celebrities and rock stars who have joined the movement.

    While the followers of the environmental movement are preoccupied with visions of planetary doom, let us see what the leaders are thinking. The first Earth Day was proclaimed on April 22, 1970, at a “Summit” meeting in Rio de Janeiro, attended by environmentalists and politicians from all over the world. A publication widely circulated at that meeting was entitled the Environmental Handbook. The main theme of the book was summarized by a quotation from Princeton Professor Richard A. Falk, a member of the CFR. Falk wrote that there are four interconnected threats to the planet – wars of mass destruction, overpopulation, pollution, and the depletion of resources. Then he said: “The basis of all four problems is the inadequacy of the sovereign states to manage the affairs of mankind in the twentieth century.” (14)

    The Handbook continued the CFR line by asking these rhetorical questions: “Are nation-states actually feasible, now that they have power to destroy each other in a single afternoon?… What price would most people be willing to pay for a more durable kind of human organization – more taxes, giving up national flags, perhaps the sacrifice of some of our hard-won liberties?” (15)

    In 1989, the CFR-owned Washington Post published an article written by CFR member George Kennan in which he said: “We must prepare instead for … an age where the great enemy is not the Soviet Union, but the rapid deterioration of our planet as a supporting structure for civilized life.” (16)

    On March 27, 1990, in the CFR-controlled New York Times, CFR member Michael Oppenheimer wrote: “Global warming, ozone depletion, deforestation and overpopulation are the four horsemen of a looming 21st century apocalypse. … as the cold war recedes, the environment is becoming the No. 1 international security concern.” (17)

    CFR member, Lester Brown, heads up another think tank called the Worldwatch Institute. In the Institute’s annual report, entitled State of the World 1991, Brown said that “the battle to save the planet will replace th